Electromagnetic reprogrammable coding-metasurface holograms

Article metrics

Abstract

Metasurfaces have enabled a plethora of emerging functions within an ultrathin dimension, paving way towards flat and highly integrated photonic devices. Despite the rapid progress in this area, simultaneous realization of reconfigurability, high efficiency, and full control over the phase and amplitude of scattered light is posing a great challenge. Here, we try to tackle this challenge by introducing the concept of a reprogrammable hologram based on 1-bit coding metasurfaces. The state of each unit cell of the coding metasurface can be switched between ‘1’ and ‘0’ by electrically controlling the loaded diodes. Our proof-of-concept experiments show that multiple desired holographic images can be realized in real time with only a single coding metasurface. The proposed reprogrammable hologram may be a key in enabling future intelligent devices with reconfigurable and programmable functionalities that may lead to advances in a variety of applications such as microscopy, display, security, data storage, and information processing.

Introduction

Holography is one of the most promising imaging techniques for recording the amplitude and phase information of light to reconstruct the image of objects1. Computer-generated holograms2 are diffractive optical elements that encode the holographic information of object pattern calculated by computer. As a revolutionary three-dimensional imaging technique holography has attracted tremendous attention due to various applications in display, security, data storage, etc. However, most of the conventional holograms have either low resolutions or limited image quality. Their phase modulations rely on the light propagation over long distances inside the material in order to achieve the desired phase accumulation for wavefront shaping, resulting in large size of unit cells and large thickness of the phase holograms comparable to the wavelength.

Metasurfaces, ultrathin planar surfaces made of subwavelength metallic or dielectric elements, have shown the capability to arbitrarily manipulate the propagation and scattering of electromagnetic (EM) waves. Metasurfaces have emerged as promising alternatives for shaping wavefronts of light, and have recently been designed to realize versatile functionalities, including ultrathin planar lenses3,4,5,6, optical vortex beam generations7, 8, spin Hall effects of lights9, 10, and metasurface holograms.

Compared with the conventional holograms, metasurface holograms have featured two major advantages. First, they provide unprecedented spatial resolution, low noise, and high precision of the reconstructed images, since both phase and amplitude information of the wavefront can be recorded in ultrathin and ultra-small holograms. Second, the pixel size is in the subwavelength scale that results in much higher transmission or reflection efficiency (the fraction of the transmitted or reflected energy of the light that contributes to the holographic image) than the traditional holograms due to the suppression or elimination of undesired diffraction orders. A number of metasurface holograms have been proposed and experimentally demonstrated in the terahertz, infrared, and visible regimes11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,21, 36, 41, 42 to achieve holographic images of high efficiency, good image quality, and full colour. Although metasurface holograms offer extraordinary advantages, only static holographic images have been reported thus far because the phase/magnitude profiles are fixed once the metasurfaces are fabricated. Recently, dynamic/active metasurfaces or metamaterials by exploiting tunable or switchable materials have been proposed to realize various functionality, such as thermal-sensitive phase change materials Ge2Sb2Te5 22, 23 for super-oscillation focusing20 a vanadium dioxide24,25,26 for beam scanning21, applied-voltage sensitive graphene27,28,29 for beam scanning25, 26, mechanical actuation30, 31 to reorient/rearrange the meta-atoms, and coherent controls of the light–matter interaction for all-optical logical operation and image processing32. Additionally, active elements (e.g., varactors and diodes) have been utilized on metasurfaces to demonstrate dynamic EM wave controls in microwave frequencies, such as the beam forming33 and computational microwave imaging34. However, achieving dynamic hologram remains a challenging problem, and this holy grail is still far from being well addressed or solved so as to realize ultrathin, real-time pixel-level reconfigurable, and arbitrary holography. Metasurface-based holograms, with the judicious designs and pixel-level independent control of active components, may empower such ultimate dynamic capabilities for various applications that may revolutionarily advance the computational imager35, 36, the wireless communication, and reproducing the digital EM environments.

In this article, we propose reprogrammable holograms by using 1-bit coding metasurfaces that are confirmed by proof-of-concept experiments in the microwave frequencies. By incorporating an electric diode into the unit cell of the metasurface, the scattering state of each individual unit cell can be controlled by applying different biased voltages across the diode. Thus, a single metasurface can accomplish various functions dynamically via the field programmable gate array (FPGA). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reprogrammable hologram that can provide switchable phase modulations at microwave frequencies, with different high-resolution and low-noise holographic images generated by a single hologram. Our work addresses several critical issues typically associated with the current static metasurface holograms, featuring simplicity, being rewritable, high image quality, and high efficiency.

Results

Design of reprogrammable hologram

The conventional Gerchberg–Saxton (GS) algorithm36 has been modified for generating the binary phase profile of the reprogrammable hologram (see Methods). The effective induced current is first introduced to characterize the realistic EM response of the metasurface unit cells in order to address the accuracy issue arising from the point-like dipole model. The induced current can be obtained by applying the Huygens’s principle or the source inversion technique37. Each unit cell of the dynamic metasurface assumes one of the two switchable states: ‘0’ and ‘1’, while the induced effective current associated with each state solely determines the radiation property of the unit cell. Consequently, the design of the reprogrammable metasurface hologram is mathematically casted into a combinatorial optimization problem, as opposed to the continuous-valued optimization problem solved in the conventional GS algorithm. To solve this combinatorial optimization problem, the standard GS algorithm is reformulated, and more careful considerations have been given to the back/forward propagation operations, as illustrated in Methods.

Figure 1 illustrates a sketch of the proposed dynamic holograph imaging with a 1-bit reprogrammable metasurface. The meta-atom (unit cell) of the 1-bit reprogrammable metasurface is parametrically tailored for our purpose based on our previously developed metamaterial33. In each unit cell, two planar symmetrically patterned metallic structures are printed on the top surface of the F4B substrate with a dielectric constant of 2.65 and a loss tangent of 0.001, with a diode loaded between them. For each planar structure, four metallic via holes are drilled through the substrate to connect the top structure with four pieces of separated grounds on the bottom surface of the substrate that are used to apply the direct current (DC) bias voltage. Thus, each unit cell can be independently programmed to realize the required ‘0’ or ‘1’ state by controlling the applied voltage bias of the diode. The unit cell size is 6 × 6 × 2 mm3 that is 0.156 × 0.156 × 0.05 λ3 at the frequency of 7.8 GHz (see Supplementary Fig. 1a in Supplementary Note 1). From simulations it is found that the scattering of the metamaterial particle is dominated by the corners of the unit cell. Hence, the near-field coupling is substantially strong if the corners of the two nearby cells are close enough to each other. To suppress the corner-related scattering effect, 5 × 5 unit cells are grouped to form a half-wavelength supercell.

Fig. 1
figure1

A sketch of the proposed dynamic holographic imaging. The metasurface in the middle is formed by an array of meta-atoms, with each having a pin diode welded between the two metallic loops and independently controlled by a DC voltage through a via (see the unit cell in the upper left corner). A computer digitally controls the metasurface by dynamically changing the phase distribution (Hologram 1, 2, 3,…) computed from the modified GS algorithm. Under the illumination of a feeding antenna (on the bottom right side), the metasurface hologram can successively project the holographic images (Frame 1, 2, 3…) at the imaging plane (Z r), showing the letters ‘P’, ‘K’, ‘U’

The diode is at the state of ‘ON’ (or ‘OFF’) with a biased voltage of 3.3 V (or 0 V), and the corresponding equivalent circuit is illustrated in the upper (lower) part of Supplementary Fig. 1b. The numerical results obtained by inserting the circuit models into the CST Microwave Studio show that the metamaterial particle behaves as a ‘1’ (‘0’) element when the diode is ‘ON’ (‘OFF’). As shown in Fig. 2a, the transmission phase difference between the ‘1’ and ‘0’ states obtained by the CST S-parameter simulation is 180° around the frequency of 7.8 GHz. Figure 2b shows that the theoretical reflection efficiency can reach above 90%. Figure 2c–f compares the amplitude and phase distributions of the current induced on the half-wavelength supercell at the ‘0’ and ‘1’ states at 7.8 GHz, respectively. It can be seen that the induced current is almost homogeneously distributed across the supercell. One interesting observation is that when the state of the metasurface supercell is switched from ‘1’ to ‘0’ (or from ‘0’ to ‘1’), the amplitudes of the induced current remain almost unchanged, while the phases are flipped by 180°.

Fig. 2
figure2

Phase and amplitude of the metasurface supercell. a The phase responses of the metamaterial supercell as the biased diode is ‘OFF’ and ‘ON’ over a range of frequencies. b The reflection efficiency of the metaatom when the biased diode is at the state of ‘OFF’ and ‘ON’. cf The distributions of normalized amplitudes and phases of the equivalent currents on the half-wavelength supercell as the biased diode is at ‘OFF’ and ‘ON’ states. The equivalent current is retrieved at the frequency of 7.8 GHz by performing the source inversion technique

Experimental results

The reprogrammable hologram is validated by proof-of-concept experiments at microwave frequencies. To confirm the reconfigurable ability of the metasurface, a sequence of holographic images, namely a sentence of ‘LOVE PKU! SEU! NUS!’, are generated. The 1-bit coding metasurface is composed of 20 × 20 supercells, covering an area of 600 × 600 mm2. The dynamic metasurface hologram is fabricated by using the standard printed circuit board process on a FR4 substrate (\({\varepsilon _{\rm r}} \approx 2.65\)). By toggling different applied voltages to control the ‘ON’ and ‘OFF’ states of the diodes, the required distribution of ‘0’ and ‘1’ elements across the dynamic metasurface hologram can be achieved. In the experiment, a feeding antenna with working bandwidth from 6 to 14 GHz is employed to generate the x-polarized quasiplane waves for illuminating the coding metasurface, and a standard waveguide probe is used to scan the image plane with a resolution of 5 × 5 mm2 to obtain the holographic images(see more details in Methods).

The phase profiles of the holograms for the letters obtained by the modified GS algorithm are plotted in Fig. 3, in which the green and blue colours represent two different digital states with constant amplitude. The corresponding simulation results by commercial software, CST Microwave Studio, are plotted in Fig. 4. In the numerical simulations, the holograms are illuminated by an x-polarized plane wave, and the holographic image is detected at Z r = 400 mm that clearly shows the letters ‘LOVE PKU! SEU! NUS!’. The experimentally observed holographic images of ‘LOVE PKU! SEU! NUS!’ by setting the corresponding phase distribution across the coding metasurface is presented in Fig. 5, which is in very good agreement with the CST-based numerical simulations shown in Fig. 4. An overall efficiency of ~60% (defined as the fraction of the incident energy that contributes to the holographic image) is achieved in our metasurface hologram design that is lower than the simulated values (above ~90%) due to the phase-quantization loss38 (see Supplementary Fig. 5), the non-ideal plane-wave illumination, the imperfect quality of commercial PIN diode, etc., as discussed in Supplementary Note 5. We also achieved a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of ~10 in the metasurface hologram sample that is defined as the ratio of the peak intensity in the image to the standard deviation of the background noise19.

Fig. 3
figure3

The binary phase profiles of the coding metasurface for different holographic images. The binary holograms for a sequence of letters of ‘LOVE PKU! SEU! NUS!’ are generated by the modified GS algorithm that could be realized by switching the states of corresponding unit cells of the coding metasurface

Fig. 4
figure4

The simulation results of holographic images with the phase profiles in Fig. 3. The simulated holographic images (E x -field intensity) of ‘LOVE PKU! SEU! NUS!’ corresponding to the holograms shown in Fig. 3 are obtained at the image plane of Z r = 0.4 m with an x-polarized incidence

Fig. 5
figure5

The experimental results of holograph images with the phase profiles in Fig. 3. The experimentally observed holographic images (E x -field intensity) of ‘LOVE PKU! SEU! NUS!’ corresponding to the holograms shown in Fig. 3 are measured at the image plane of Z r = 0.4 m, that agree well with the simulation results illustrated in Fig. 4

Discussion

The hologram optimized by the modified GS algorithm strongly depends on the position of the image plane. To prove the robustness of the metasurface hologram against the observation distance, Supplementary Note 3 presents the evolution of the holographic images of ‘S’ with the increase of observation distance, i.e., 400, 440, 480, and 700 mm, where the optimal hologram is achieved at Z r = 400 mm. It is noticed that the quality of the holographic image is acceptable when the observation distance is <500 mm. Hence, the hologram requires adjustment to achieve clearer holographic images when the holographic plane is relocated. Consequently, the quality of holographic image can be dramatically improved by adaptively reprogramming the metasurface hologram for the observation distance of interest. Supplementary Movie1 shows the evolution of the holographic images with increasing observation distance for the metasurface hologram with and without being adaptively tuned, clearly demonstrating that high-quality image can be maintained for different image locations with adaptive tuning. Figure 6 presents a quantitative analysis in terms of SNR of the holographic images, from which we clearly see that the image quality is significantly improved by 4–5 dB when the hologram is adaptively tuned. Apparently, the reprogrammable metasurface hologram can provide a higher-quality image in a more flexible way. Although the reprogrammable metasurface hologram is designed at 7.8 GHz, it works well within an operating frequency bandwidth of 0.5 GHz (see Supplementary Figs 3 and 4 in Supplementary Note 4). Similarly, it is expected that the holographic image quality can be improved when the operational frequency changes if we adaptively adjust the hologram.

Fig. 6
figure6

The dependence of SNR for the holographic image as the function of observation distance. The red line represents SNR for the holographic image as a function of the observation distance with the adaptive adjustment of the metasurface hologram, while the blue dashed line denotes SNR for the holograph image with the observation distance fixed at Z r = 400 mm. These two lines are obtained by averaging the results of ‘LOVE PKU! SEU! NUS!’

Here are programmable 1-bit coding metasurface hologram has been proposed and experimentally realized that can, in principle, generate arbitrary holographic images by programming the input control voltages. A prototype of the reprogrammable metasurface hologram was fabricated to produce different images in the microwave frequencies. The proof-of-concept experimental results agree very well with thenumerical simulations, validating the programmable metasurface as a viable means for creating more sophisticated holograms. In the experiments, the switching speed of the PIN diode is 3 ns, and hence the total hologram reconfiguration time depends mainly on the configuration of the control circuit. When the PIN diodes are controlled in parallel by FPGA, the reconfiguration time is completely determined by the FPGA clock (CLK) rate. On the other hand, if the PIN diodes are controlled in the clustered way in case the number of FPGA Input/Output (I/O) is not enough, the reconfiguration time would be increased by a factor of the cluster number. In our experiments, we adopt the parallel way, in which the FPGA clock rate is 100 MHz, corresponding to the time of each operation cycle of 10 ns. To change the PIN diode status in parallel, three operation cycles are needed after compiling. Thus, the total hologram reconfiguration time is 33 ns. Although the proposed metasurface hologram works in the mode of 1-bit coding and phase-only modulation, the reprogrammable metasurface holograms can be readily extended to exhibit multiple bits and both phase and amplitude modulations that can lead to more advanced, efficient, and versatile devices with adaptive and rewritable functionalities.

We remark that the reconfigurable metasurface hologram may also be realized at higher frequencies using the proposed methodology by constructing 1-bit phase-modulated light spatial masks. Several well-established switchable diodes may facilitate the frequency scaling, for instance, the Schottky diode at the terahertz39, 40 and the thermal VO2 diode in the infrared-and-visible frequencies41, 42. Additionally, by incorporating other phase changing materials like Ge2Sb2Te5 22, 23 into appropriate nano-antenna design, it is possible to extend our concept of dynamic metasurface holography to higher frequencies through dynamically modifying the phase of scattering from each individual antennas, while maintaining the same scattering magnitude.

Methods

The modified GS algorithm

As shown in Eq. 1, the hologram E is linearly related to the current J induced over the metasurface illuminated by a plane wave. However, the effective induced current J is dependent on the binary metasurface hologram S in a nonlinear manner. For the purpose of numerical computational implementation, Supplementary Eq. 1 is reformulated in the compact form, i.e., E = AJ, where the mapping matrix with entries of \({\int _\Delta} g({\bf{r}},{{\bf{r}}_{{n_x},{n_y}}} + \delta {\bf{r}}){{\bf{J}}^{({S_{{n_x},{n_y}}})}}(\delta {\bf{r}}){\rm d}\delta {\bf{r}}\) comes from Supplementary Eq. 1. Similar to the conventional GS algorithm, the modified GS algorithm works in the manner of alternating projections. It attempts to minimize the nonconvex objective function defined by \(\mathop {\sum }_{i = 1}^{{N_x}{N_y}} {\left( {{{{E}}^{{\rm{des}}}}\left( i \right) - |{{E}}\left( i \right)|} \right)^2}\), where E des(i) denotes the value of desired image at the ith pixel. The algorithm starts with a random initialization and iteratively imposing the hologram domain (support) and measured amplitude constraints using projections, as summarized in Table 1. The process converges after several iterations. Supplementary Movie 2 is provided to illustrate the behaviour of images with the progress of iterations. The source inversion technique is employed to calibrate the current distributions of J (1) and J (0). After that, the metasurface particle either at the state of ‘1’ or ‘0’ is illuminated by a plane wave, and the resultant copolarized electric field is collected at one wavelength away from the metasurface particle. The calibration measurements are organized into a column vector e. To characterize the inhomogeneous current induced within the metasurface particle, one metasurface particle is regarded as an array of 10 × 10 point-like dipoles, stacked in a 100-length column vector of p. Apparently, the calibration vector e is linearly related to the vector p as e = Gp, where the entries of G come from the three-dimensional Green’s function in free space. Then, the complex-valued amplitude of p can be readily retrieved by solving the least-square problem of e = Gp.

Table 1 The modified GS algorithm

Measurement system

To complete the measurement calibration and measure the normalized holographic image, an experimental setup is established in an anechoic chamber with the size of 2 × 2 × 2 m3 that includes a transmitting (Tx) horn antenna, a waveguide probe as a receiver, and a vector network analyzer (VNA, Agilent E5071C), as illuminated in Supplementary Fig. 4. In our imaging experiments, the VNA is used to acquire the response data by measuring the transmission coefficients (S 21). More specifically, the horn antenna and waveguide tip are connected to two ports of a VNA through two 4-m-long 50 Ω coaxial cables. To suppress the measurement noise level, the average number and filter bandwidth in the VNA are set to 10 and 10 kHz, respectively. Both the feeding antenna and sample were coaxially mounted on a board at a distance of 1.8 m that was chosen based on the consideration that the feeding antenna should be placed inside the Fraunhofer region of the coding metasurface. The Fraunhofer distance can be calculated by \(R = 2{L^2}/\lambda \), where L is the maximum electric length of the antenna and λ the working wavelength. This distance ensures that the optical path difference between the centre and the edge of the coding metasurface is less than λ/16, providing a quasiplane wave incidence as considered in the far-field numerical simulations. As R is proportional to L 2, the distance between the feeding antenna and coding metasurface becomes too large for our microwave chamber, and this is the reason why the size of the fabricated sample is reduced to half of the model in simulations. One may notice that the distance 1.8 m in the experiment is smaller than the minimum distance R calculated from the formula. We remark that the aforementioned distance of the far-field region was obtained from the assumption of point source excitation, whereas in the experimental case, the incident wavefront generated from the horn antenna is relatively flat, and the corresponding distance R could be reduced accordingly.

Data availability

The authors declare that all relevant data are available in the paper and its Supplementary Information Files, or from the corresponding author on request.

References

  1. 1.

    Gabor, D. A new microscopic principle. Nature 161, 777–778 (1948).

  2. 2.

    Poon, T.-C. & Liu, J.-P. Introduction to Modern Digital Holography: with Matlab (Cambridge University Press, 2014).

  3. 3.

    Aieta, F. et al. Aberration-free ultrathin flat lenses and Axicons at telecom wavelengths based on plasmonic metasurfaces. Nano. Lett. 12, 4932–4936 (2012).

  4. 4.

    Chen, X. et al. Dual-polarity plasmonic metalens for visible light. Nat. Commun. 3, 1198 (2012).

  5. 5.

    Pors, A., Nielsen, M. G., Eriksen, R. L. & Bozhevolnyi, S. I. Broadband focusing flat mirrors based on plasmonic gradient metasurfaces. Nano. Lett. 13, 829–834 (2013).

  6. 6.

    Wan, X., Jiang, W. X., Ma, H. F. & Cui, T. J. A broadband transformation-optics metasurface lens. Appl. Phys. Lett. 104, 151601 (2014).

  7. 7.

    Genevet, P., Lin, J., Kats, M. A. & Capasso, F. Holographic detection of the orbital angular momentum of light with plasmonic photodiodes. Nat. Commun. 3, 1278 (2012).

  8. 8.

    Huang, L. et al. Dispersionless phase discontinuities for controlling light propagation. Nano Lett. 12, 5750–5755 (2012).

  9. 9.

    Yin, X., Ye, Z., Rho, J., Wang, Y. & Zhang, X. Photonic spin Hall effect at metasurfaces. Science 339, 1405–1407 (2013).

  10. 10.

    Shitrit, N. et al. Spin-optical metamaterial route to spin-controlled photonics. Science 340, 724–726 (2013).

  11. 11.

    Ni, X., Kildishev, A. V. & Shalaev, V. M. Metasurface holograms for visible light. Nat. Commun. 4, 3807 (2013).

  12. 12.

    Zheng, G. et al. Metasurface holograms reaching 80% efficiency. Nat. Nanotechnol 10, 308–312 (2015).

  13. 13.

    Larouche, S., Tsai, Y.-J., Tyler, T., Jokerst, N. M. & Smith, D. R. Infrared metamaterial phase holograms. Nat. Mater. 11, 450–454 (2012).

  14. 14.

    Walther, B. et al. Spatial and spectral light shaping with metamaterials. Adv. Mater. 24, 6300–6304 (2012).

  15. 15.

    Huang, L. et al. Broadband hybrid holographic multiplexing with geometric metasurfaces. Adv. Mater. 27, 6444–6449 (2015).

  16. 16.

    Zhao, W. et al. Full-color hologram using spatial multiplexing of dielectric metasurface. Opt. Lett. 41, 147 (2016).

  17. 17.

    Wen, D. et al. Helicity multiplexed broadband metasurface holograms. Nat. Commun. 6, 8241 (2015).

  18. 18.

    Wang, B. et al. Visible-frequency dielectric metasurfaces for multiwavelength achromatic and highly dispersive holograms. Nano Lett. 16, 5235–5240 (2016).

  19. 19.

    Yu, N. et al. Light propagation with phase discontinuities: generalized laws of reflection and refraction. Science 334, 333–337 (2011).

  20. 20.

    Ni, X., Emani, N. K., Kildishev, A. V., Boltasseva, A. & Shalaev, V. M. Broadband light bending with plasmonic nanoantennas. Science 335, 427–427 (2012).

  21. 21.

    Wang, D. et al. Switchable ultrathin quarter-wave plate in terahertz using active phase-change metasurfaces. Sci. Rep. 5, 15020 (2015).

  22. 22.

    Gholipour, B., Zhang, J., MacDonald, K. F., Hewak, D. W. & Zheludev, N. I. An all-optical, non-volatile, bidirectional, phase-change meta-switch. Adv. Mater. 25, 3050–3054 (2013).

  23. 23.

    Wang, Q. et al. Optically reconfigurable metasurfaces and photonic devices based on phase change materials. Nat. Photonics 10, 60–65 (2015).

  24. 24.

    Kaplan, G., Aydin, K. & Scheuer, J. Dynamically controlled plasmonic nano-antenna phased array utilizing vanadium dioxide. Opt. Mater. Express 5, 2513 (2015).

  25. 25.

    Dicken, M. J. et al. Frequency tunable near-infrared metamaterials based on VO2 phase transition. Opt. Express 17, 18330 (2009).

  26. 26.

    Tao, H. et al. Reconfigurable terahertz metamaterials. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 147401 (2009).

  27. 27.

    Ju, L. et al. Graphene plasmonics for tunable terahertz metamaterials. Nat. Nanotechnol. 6, 630–634 (2011).

  28. 28.

    Yao, Y. et al. Broad electrical tuning of graphene-loaded plasmonic antennas. Nano Lett. 13, 1257–1264 (2013).

  29. 29.

    Huang, Y.-W. et al. Gate-tunable conducting oxide metasurfaces. Nano Lett. 16, 5319–5325 (2016).

  30. 30.

    Ou, J. Y., Plum, E., Jiang, L. & Zheludev, N. I. Reconfigurable photonic metamaterials. Nano Lett. 11, 2142–2144 (2011).

  31. 31.

    Ou, J.-Y., Plum, E., Zhang, J. & Zheludev, N. I. An electromechanically reconfigurable plasmonic metamaterial operating in the near-infrared. Nat. Nanotechnol. 8, 252–255 (2013).

  32. 32.

    Papaioannou, M., Plum, E., Valente, J., Rogers, E. T. & Zheludev, N. I. Two-dimensional control of light with light on metasurfaces. Light Sci. Appl. 5, e16070 (2016).

  33. 33.

    Cui, T. J., Qi, M. Q., Wan, X., Zhao, J. & Cheng, Q. Coding metamaterials, digital metamaterials and programmable metamaterials. Light Sci. Appl. 3, e218 (2014).

  34. 34.

    Li, Y. B. et al. Transmission-type 2-bit programmable metasurface for single-sensor and single-frequency microwave imaging. Sci. Rep. 6, 23731 (2016).

  35. 35.

    Boominathan, V. et al. Lensless imaging: a computational renaissance. IEEE Sig. Proc. Mag. 16, 1053 (2016).

  36. 36.

    Gerchberg, R. W. & Saxton, W. O. A practical algorithm for the determination of the phase from image and diffraction plane pictures. Optik 35, 227–246 (1972).

  37. 37.

    Devaney, A. J. Mathematical Foundations of Imaging, Tomography and Wavefield Inversion (Cambridge University Press, 2012).

  38. 38.

    Yifat, Y. et al. Highly efficient and broadband wide-angle holography using patch-dipole nanoantenna reflectarrays. Nano Lett. 14, 2485–2490 (2014).

  39. 39.

    Website of Teratech Components Ltd, http://www.teratechcomponents.com/

  40. 40.

    Peatman, W. C. B. et al. Quarter-micrometer GaAs Schottky barrier diode with high video responsivity at 118μm. Appl. Phys. Lett. 63, 284–290 (1992).

  41. 41.

    Ghanekar, A. et al. High-rectification near-field thermal diode using phase change periodic nanostructure. Appl. Phys. Lett. 109, 123106 (2016).

  42. 42.

    Barker, A. S. et al. Infrared optical properties of vanadium dioxide above and below the transition temperature. Phys. Rev. Lett. 17, 1286–1289 (1966).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part from the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos. 61471006, 61631007, and 61571117, and in part from the 111 Project under Grant No. 111-2-05. C.-W.Q. acknowledges the support from the National Research Foundation, Prime Minister’s Office, Singapore, under its Competitive Research Programme (CRP Award No. NRF-CRP15-2015-03). S.Z. acknowledges financial support from ERC consolidator grant (TOPOLOGICAL), the Royal Society, the Wolfson Foundation, and Leverhulme (RPG-2012-674).

Author information

L.L., T.J.C., C.-W.Q., and S.Z. conceived the idea. L.L. conducted the numerical simulations and theoretical analysis. L.L., T.J.C., C.-W.Q., and S.Z. wrote the manuscript. All authors participated in the experiments and data analysis and read the manuscript.

Correspondence to Lianlin Li or Tie Jun Cui or Shuang Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.