Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

IJIR publishes special/guest-edited issues and topical collections. The peer review process for articles included in topical collections/special issues is the same as the peer review process of the journal in general. Additionally, if the Guest Editors author an article in their topical collection/special issue, they will not handle the peer review process.​

The associations of sexual desire, daily stress, and intimacy in gay men in long-term relationships

International Journal of Impotence Research (2023)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

We investigated the associations between daily stress, sexual desire and intimacy in gay men in long-term relationships. A daily diary method of data collection was used. Twenty-two adult participants completed brief questionnaires ten times per day during seven consecutive days. Multilevel regression analyses revealed significant negative associations of daily stress with sexual desire (p = 0.003); higher stress came with lower levels of sexual desire, and vice versa. The hypothesized moderation effect of the associations of stress with sexual desire by intimacy was found significant (p = 0.003). However, the effect was not as predicted: at higher levels of intimacy the negative effect of stress on sexual desire was shown to be stronger than at lower levels. Most temporal associations of stress and intimacy with sexual desire were not significant. Nevertheless, the present findings implicate that daily stress and intimacy are important factors in sexual functioning of gay men in long-term relationships.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Get just this article for as long as you need it

$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Moderation of the effect of stress on sexual desire by intimacy.
Fig. 2: Moderation of the effect of lagged sexual desire on stress by lagged intimacy.

Data availability

The data and SPSS syntax to analyze it are available at: https://osf.io/3yfbx/.

References

  1. Buczak-Stec E, König H-H, Hajek A. The link between sexual satisfaction and subjective well-being: A longitudinal perspective based on the german ageing survey. Qual Life Res. 2019;28:3025–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Stephenson KR, Meston CM. The conditional importance of sex: Exploring the association between sexual well-being and life satisfaction. J Sex Marital Ther. 2015;41:25–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gil S. Body-image, well-being and sexual satisfaction: A comparison between heterosexual and gay men. Sex Relat Ther. 2007;22:237–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Holmberg D, Blair KL, Phillips M. Women’s sexual satisfaction as a predictor of well-being in same-sex versus mixed-sex relationships. J Sex Res. 2010;47:1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Park Y, MacDonald G. Single and partnered individuals’ sexual satisfaction as a function of sexual desire and activities: Results using a sexual satisfaction scale demonstrating measurement invariance across partnership status. Arch Sex Behav. 2022;51:547–64.

  6. Peixoto MM. Sexual satisfaction, solitary, and dyadic sexual desire in men according to sexual orientation. J Homosex. 2019;66:769–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Critcher CR, Siegel M. Cross-sectional analyses can evaluate the plausibility of, but not validate, causal accounts. Am J Prev Med. 2022;62:e141–e3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. McDonagh LK, Bishop C, Brockman M, Morrison TG. A systematic review of sexual dysfunction measures for gay men: How do current measures measure up? J Homosex. 2014;61:781–816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mitchell KR, Wellings KA, Graham C. How do men and women define sexual desire and sexual arousal? J Sex Marital Ther. 2014;40:17–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bancroft J. The endocrinology of sexual arousal. J Endocrinol. 2005;186:411–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Janssen E. Sexual arousal in men: A review and conceptual analysis. Horm Behav. 2011;59:708–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Folkman S, Lazarus RS, Dunkel-Schetter C, DeLongis A, Gruen RJ. Dynamics of a stressful encounter: Cognitive appraisal, coping, and encounter outcomes. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986;50:992–1003.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wheaton B. Stress, personal coping resources, and psychiatric symptoms: An investigation of interactive models. J Health Soc Behav. 1983;24:208–29.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Randall AK, Bodenmann G. The role of stress on close relationships and marital satisfaction. Clin Psychol Rev. 2009;29:105–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bodenmann G, Ledermann T, Bradbury TN. Stress, sex, and satisfaction in marriage. Pers Relatsh. 2007;14:551–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ledermann T, Bodenmann G, Rudaz M, Bradbury TN. Stress, communication, and marital quality in couples. Fam Relat. 2010;59:195–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bodenmann G, Randall AK, Falconier MK. Coping in couples: The systemic transactional model (STM). In: Falconier MK, Randall AK, Bodenmann G, editors. Couples coping with stress: A cross-cultural perspective. New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group; 2016. p. 5–22.

  18. Bodenmann G, Falconier MK, Randall AK. Dyadic coping. Front Psychol. 2019;10:1498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bodenmann G. Dyadic coping: A systemic-transactional view of stress and coping among couples: Theory and empirical findings. Eur Rev Appl Psychol. 1997;47:137–41.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bodenmann G. Dyadic coping and its significance for marital functioning. In: Revenson TA, Kayser K, Bodenmann G, editors. Couples coping with stress: Emerging perspectives on dyadic coping. Decade of behavior. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2005. p. 33–49.

  21. Cohan CL, Bradbury TN. Negative life events, marital interaction, and the longitudinal course of newlywed marriage. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1997;73:114–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Dohrenwend BS, Dohrenwend BP. Stressful life events: Their nature and effects. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons; 1974.

  23. Garcia MA, Umberson D. Marital strain and psychological distress in same‐sex and different‐sex couples. J Marriage Fam. 2019;81:1253–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lewis RJ, Derlega VJ, Griffin JL, Krowinski AC. Stressors for gay men and lesbians: Life stress, gay-related stress, stigma consciousness, and depressive symptoms. J Soc Clin Psychol. 2003;22:716–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lattanner MR, Pachankis JE, Hatzenbuehler ML. Mechanisms linking distal minority stress and depressive symptoms in a longitudinal, population-based study of gay and bisexual men: A test and extension of the psychological mediation framework. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2022;90:638–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bodenmann G, Ledermann T, Blattner D, Galluzzo C. Associations among everyday stress, critical life events, and sexual problems. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2006;194:494–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ein-Dor T, Hirschberger G. Sexual healing: Daily diary evidence that sex relieves stress for men and women in satisfying relationships. J Soc Pers Relat. 2012;29:126–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hamilton LD, Julian AM. The relationship between daily hassles and sexual function in men and women. J Sex Marital Ther. 2014;40:379–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Bodenmann G, Atkins DC, Schar M, Poffet V. The association between daily stress and sexual activity. J Fam Psychol. 2010;24:271–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Bancroft J. The medicalization of female sexual dysfunction: The need for caution. Arch Sex Behav. 2002;31:451–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Bancroft J, Janssen E, Strong D, Carnes L, Vukadinovic Z, Long JS. The relation between mood and sexuality in heterosexual men. Arch Sex Behav. 2003;32:217–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Bancroft J, Janssen E, Strong D, Vukadinovic Z. The relation between mood and sexuality in gay men. Arch Sex Behav. 2003;32:231–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Abedi P, Afrazeh M, Javadifar N, Saki A. The relation between stress and sexual function and satisfaction in reproductive-age women in iran: A cross-sectional study. J Sex Marital Ther. 2015;41:384–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Morokoff PJ, Gillilland R. Stress, sexual functioning, and marital satisfaction. J Sex Res. 1993;30:43–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Donnelly R, Umberson D, Kroeger RA. Childhood adversity, daily stress, and marital strain in same-sex and different-sex marriages. J Fam Issues. 2018;39:2085–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Reczek C, Umberson D. Gender, health behavior, and intimate relationships: Lesbian, gay, and straight contexts. Soc Sci Med. 2012;74:1783–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Impett EA, Gable SL, Peplau LA. Giving up and giving in: The costs and benefits of daily sacrifice in intimate relationships. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005;89:327–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Rubin H, Campbell L. Day-to-day changes in intimacy predict heightened relationship passion, sexual occurrence, and sexual satisfaction: A dyadic diary analysis. Soc Psychol Pers Sci. 2012;3:224–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Coleman E. Masturbation as a means of achieving sexual health. J Psychol Hum Sex. 2002;14:5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Birnbaum GE, Cohen O, Wertheimer V. Is it all about intimacy? Age, menopausal status, and women’s sexuality. Pers Relatsh. 2007;14:167–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Baumeister RF, Bratslavsky E. Passion, intimacy, and time: Passionate love as a function of change in intimacy. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 1999;3:49–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Harper JM, Schaalje BG, Sandberg JG. Daily hassles, intimacy, and marital quality in later life marriages. Am J Fam Ther. 2000;28:1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Totenhagen CJ, Butler EA, Ridley CA. Daily stress, closeness, and satisfaction in gay and lesbian couples. Pers Relatsh. 2012;19:219–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Yoo H, Bartle-Haring S, Day RD, Gangamma R. Couple communication, emotional and sexual intimacy, and relationship satisfaction. J Sex Marital Ther. 2014;40:275–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. van Tuijl P, Verboon P, van Lankveld JJ. Associations between fluctuating shame, self-esteem, and sexual desire: Comparing frequent porn users and a general population sample. Sexes. 2021;3:1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. van Lankveld J, Jacobs N, Thewissen V, Dewitte M, Verboon P. The associations of intimacy and sexuality in daily life: Temporal dynamics and gender effects within romantic relationships. J Soc Pers Relat. 2018;35:557–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Sternberg RJ. A triangular theory of love. Psychol Rev. 1986;93:119–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Myin-Germeys I, Oorschot M, Collip D, Lataster J, Delespaul P, van Os J. Experience sampling research in psychopathology: Opening the black box of daily life. Psychol Med. 2009;39:1533–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Hektner JM, Schmidt JA, Csikszentmihalyi M. Experience sampling method: Measuring the quality of everyday life. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2007.

  50. Jacobs N, Nicolson NA, Derom C, Delespaul P, van Os J, Myin-Germeys I. Electronic monitoring of salivary cortisol sampling compliance in daily life. Life Sci. 2005;76:2431–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Bolger N, Davis A, Rafaeli E. Diary methods: Capturing life as it is lived. Annu Rev Psychol. 2003;54:579–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Thewissen V, Bentall RP, Oorschot M, A Campo J, van Lierop T, van Os J, et al. Emotions, self-esteem, and paranoid episodes: An experience sampling study. Br J Clin Psychol. 2011;50:178–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Delespaul PAEG. Assessing schizophrenia in daily life: The experience sampling method. Maastricht, The Netherlands: Universitaire Pers Maastricht; 1995.

  54. Myin-Germeys I, van Os J, Schwartz JE, Stone AA, Delespaul PA. Emotional reactivity to daily life stress in psychosis. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2001;58:1137–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Schneider M, Vaessen T, van Duin ED, Kasanova Z, Viechtbauer W, Reininghaus U, et al. Affective and psychotic reactivity to daily-life stress in adults with 22q11ds: A study using the experience sampling method. J Neurodev Disord. 2020;12:1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. McDonald RP. Test theory: A unified approach. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1999.

  57. Spector IP, Carey MP, Steinberg L. The sexual desire inventory: Development, factor structure, and evidence of reliability. J Sex Marital Ther. 1996;22:175–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Basson R. Women’s sexual desire - disordered or misunderstood? J Sex Marital Ther. 2002;28:17–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Rosseel Y. Lavaan: An r package for structural equation modeling. J Stat Softw. 2012;48:1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. R_Core_Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2022.

  61. Hox JJ. Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications, 2nd ed. New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group; 2010.

  62. Enders CK, Tofighi D. Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue. Psychol Methods. 2007;12:121–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Lafit G, Adolf JK, Dejonckheere E, Myin-Germeys I, Viechtbauer W, Ceulemans E. Selection of the number of participants in intensive longitudinal studies: A user-friendly shiny app and tutorial for performing power analysis in multilevel regression models that account for temporal dependencies. Adv Methods Pract Psychol Sci. 2021;4:1–24.

  64. van Lankveld J, van den Hout MA. Increasing neutral distraction inhibits genital but not subjective sexual arousal of sexually functional and dysfunctional men. Arch Sex Behav. 2004;33:549–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Cao H, Zhou N, Fine M, Liang Y, Li J, Mills‐Koonce WR. Sexual minority stress and same‐sex relationship well‐being: A meta‐analysis of research prior to the us nationwide legalization of same‐sex marriage. J Marriage Fam. 2017;79:1258–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Basson R. Using a different model for female sexual response to address women’s problematic low sexual desire. J Sex Marital Ther. 2001;27:395–403.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Giraldi A, Kristensen E, Sand M. Endorsement of models describing sexual response of men and women with a sexual partner: An online survey in a population sample of danish adults ages 20–65 years. J Sex Med. 2015;12:116–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Myin-Germeys I, Delespaul P, van Os J. The experience sampling method in psychosis research. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2003;16:S33–S8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Wiederman MW. Volunteer bias in sexuality research using college student participants. J Sex Res. 1999;36:59–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Meyer IH. Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: Conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychol Bull. 2003;129:674–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Leertouwer I, Cramer AOJ, Vermunt JK, Schuurman NK. A review of explicit and implicit assumptions when providing personalized feedback based on self-report ema data. Front Psychol. 2021;12:764526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Trajectum Boschoord, Boschoord, The Netherlands

    Jolanda Hiemstra

  2. Department of Psychology, Open University, Heerlen, The Netherlands

    Piet van Tuijl & Jacques van Lankveld

Authors
  1. Jolanda Hiemstra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Piet van Tuijl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jacques van Lankveld
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization: JH, JvL. Data Collection: JH. Formal analysis: PvT. Methodology: JH, JvL. Funding acquisition: N/A. Writing–original draft: JH, JvL. Writing–review & editing: JH, PvT, JvL.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jacques van Lankveld.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hiemstra, J., van Tuijl, P. & van Lankveld, J. The associations of sexual desire, daily stress, and intimacy in gay men in long-term relationships. Int J Impot Res (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-023-00664-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-023-00664-x

Search

Advanced search

Quick links