Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Post-market safety and efficacy profile of subcutaneous testosterone enanthate-autoinjector: a cohort analysis

Abstract

A subcutaneous testosterone enanthate-autoinjector (SCTE-AI) was recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration for patient-administered weekly testosterone replacement therapy (TRT). From January 2019 to October 2019, 110 hypogonadal men were treated with SCTE-AI at two institutions. Patients were assessed in a pretherapy visit prior to receiving SCTE-AI and re-assessed 6 weeks after treatment initiation. Patients with a history of prostate cancer were excluded. Trough serum total testosterone (TT), estradiol (E2), prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and hematocrit (HCT) levels were collected at clinic visits. Therapeutic phlebotomy was recommended for HCT > 54%, and treatment was discontinued for significant increases in PSA as well as for significant treatment-related adverse events. Values from each visit were compared with univariate analysis. 110 patients completed the 6 weeks of observation with a mean age of 40.3 (SD: 10.5). TT significantly rose from 246.6 ng/dL (SD:113.3) pretherapy to 538.4 ng/dL (SD: 209.3) at 6 weeks (p < 0.001). Post-therapy, 101/110 (91.8%) of patients had TT > 300 ng/dL. No patients had HCT > 54%. 74 patients (70.5%) had PSA increase with only 3 (2.9%) experiencing an increase >1.0 ng/dL. There was a significant increase in mean PSA from 1.07 ng/dL (SD: 0.8) pretherapy to 1.18 ng/dL (SD: 0.9) at 6 weeks (p = 0.01). One patient had immediate treatment cessation following diagnosis of prostate cancer. This is the largest non-industry sponsored safety and efficacy profile of SCTE-AI application in urology clinics. After 6 weeks of observation, TT levels increased significantly without any reports of adverse events. SCTE-AI is a safe and effective alternative delivery system of TRT.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zitzmann M, Nieschlag E. Hormone substitution in male hypogonadism. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2000;161:73–88.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kalyani RR, Gavini S, Dobs AS. Male Hypogonadism in Systemic Disease. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2007;36):333–48.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Muller M, Grobbee DE, den Tonkelaar I, Lamberts SWJ, van der Schouw YT. Endogenous sex hormones and metabolic syndrome in aging men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90:2618–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kupelian V, Page ST, Araujo AB, Travison TG, Bremner WJ, McKinlay JB. Low sex hormone-binding globulin, total testosterone, and symptomatic androgen deficiency are associated with development of the metabolic syndrome in nonobese men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91:843–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Mulhall JP, Trost LW, Brannigan RE, Kurtz EG, Redmon JB, Chiles KA, et al. Evaluation and management of testosterone deficiency: AUA guideline. J Urol. 2018;200:423–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dohle G, Arver S, Bettocchi C, Jones T, Kliesch S, Punab M. EAU guidelines on male hypogonadism. In Arnhem: The Netherlands: uropean Association of Urology; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sexual Medicine Society of North America (SMSNA). Consensus Statement and White Paper Executive Summary: Adult Onset Hypogonadism (AOH). 2015.

  8. Bhasin S, Brito JP, Cunningham GR, Hayes FJ, Hodis HN, Matsumoto AM, et al. Testosterone therapy in men with hypogonadism: an endocrine Society* clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2018;103:1715–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Feldman HA, Longcope C, Derby CA, Johannes CB, Araujo AB, Coviello AD, et al. Age trends in the level of serum testosterone and other hormones in middle-aged men: longitudinal results from the massachusetts male aging study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87:589–98.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Araujo AB, O’Donnell AB, Brambilla DJ, Simpson WB, Longcope C, Matsumoto AM, et al. Prevalence and incidence of androgen deficiency in middle-aged and older men: estimates from the massachusetts male aging study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89:5920–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kaminetsky J, Jaffe JS, Swerdloff RS. Pharmacokinetic profile of subcutaneous testosterone enanthate delivered via a novel, prefilled single‐use autoinjector: a phase II study. Sex Med. 2015;3:269–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mackey MA, Conway AJ, Handelsman DJ. Tolerability of intramuscular injections of testosterone ester in oil vehicle. Hum Reprod Oxf Engl. 1995;10:862–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. de Ronde W. Hyperandrogenism after transfer of topical testosterone gel: case report and review of published and unpublished studies. Hum Reprod Oxf Engl. 2009;24:425–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Xu P, Choi E, El-Khatib FM, Yafi FA. Post-market single center experience with a subcutaneous auto-injector of testosterone enanthate (Xyosted). Eur Urol Open Sci. 2020;19:e129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kaminetsky JC, McCullough A, Hwang K, Jaffe JS, Wang C, Swerdloff RS. A 52-week study of dose adjusted subcutaneous testosterone enanthate in oil self-administered via disposable auto-injector. J Urol. 2019;201:587–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gittelman M, Jaffe JS, Kaminetsky JC. Safety of a new subcutaneous testosterone enanthate auto-injector: results of a 26-week study. J Sex Med. 2019;16(Nov):1741–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee H-K, Lee JK, Cho B. The role of androgen in the adipose tissue of males. World J Mens Health. 2013;31(Aug):136–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tan RS, Cook KR, Reilly WG. High estrogen in men after injectable testosterone therapy: the low T experience. Am J Mens Health. 2015;9:229–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Shahani S, Braga-Basaria M, Maggio M, Basaria S. Androgens and erythropoiesis: past and present. J Endocrinol Invest. 2009;32:704–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Jones SD, Dukovac T, Sangkum P, Yafi FA, Hellstrom WJG. Erythrocytosis and polycythemia secondary to testosterone replacement therapy in the aging male. Sex Med Rev. 2015;3:101–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kavoussi PK, Machen GL, Wenzel JL, Ellis AM, Kavoussi M, Kavoussi KM, et al. Medical treatments for hypogonadism do not significantly increase the risk of deep vein thrombosis over general population risk. Urology 2019;124:127–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bhasin S, Cunningham GR, Hayes FJ, Matsumoto AM, Snyder PJ, Swerdloff RS, et al. Testosterone therapy in men with androgen deficiency syndromes: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95:2536–59.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Cooper CS, MacIndoe JH, Perry PJ, Yates WR, Williams RD. The effect of exogenous testosterone on total and free prostate specific antigen levels in healthy young men. J Urol. 1996;156:438–41. discussion 441–2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Guay AT, Perez JB, Fitaihi WA, Vereb M. Testosterone treatment in hypogonadal men: prostate-specific antigen level and risk of prostate cancer. Endocr Pr J Am Coll Endocrinol Am Assoc Clin Endocrinol. 2000;6:132–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Gerstenbluth RE, Maniam PN, Corty EW, Seftel AD. Prostate-specific antigen changes in hypogonadal men treated with testosterone replacement. J Androl. 2002;23:922–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Boyle P, Koechlin A, Bota M, d’Onofrio A, Zaridze DG, Perrin P, et al. Endogenous and exogenous testosterone and the risk of prostate cancer and increased prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level: a meta-analysis. BJU Int. 2016;118:731–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Loeb S, Folkvaljon Y, Damber J-E, Alukal J, Lambe M, Stattin P. Testosterone replacement therapy and risk of favorable and aggressive prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2017;35:1430–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. ClinicalTrials.gov. A study to evaluate the effect of testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) on the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and efficacy measures in hypogonadal men (TRAVERSE). 2020. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03518034.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Faysal A. Yafi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

FAY: Antares Pharmaceuticals, Clarus Therapeutics, Coloplast, Promescent, Viome; PKK: Antares Pharmaceuticals, Acerus Pharmaceuticals, Clarus Therapeutics. The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Choi, E.J., Xu, P., El-Khatib, F.M. et al. Post-market safety and efficacy profile of subcutaneous testosterone enanthate-autoinjector: a cohort analysis. Int J Impot Res 34, 467–470 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-021-00435-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-021-00435-6

Search

Quick links