Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review Article
  • Published:

Medical approach to children who may have been sexually abused—a narrative review

Abstract

The medical approach to children who may have been sexually abused involves several issues and aspects that need to be considered. The medical examination of children with suspected sexual abuse is important, but a detailed medical history from the child and the parents or caretakers is always part of every thorough examination. It can take a long time until victims disclose their abuse and physical signs of abuse may no longer be visible at the time of examination. If the physical examination is performed non-acutely, only 2.2% of sexually abused girls show diagnostic signs of injury. An experienced examiner should ideally perform the examination in suspected sexual abuse of children. Knowledge of the current literature is of importance, as the interpretation of findings has changed over the past decades and it can be difficult to differentiate between normal variants, symptoms of other medical problems, and signs of sexual assault. Furthermore, sexual abuse of children presents in various form, not necessarily leading to physical injuries. Since 1992, Adams et al. publish a regularly updated system for the classification of anogenital findings in children with suspected sexual abuse, including a detailed list of physical findings and infections related to sexual abuse. The purpose of this article is to summarize important aspects of the medical approach to children with suspected sexual abuse according to the current literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Matkins PP, Jordan KS. Pediatric sexual abuse. Emergency department evaluation and management. Adv Emerg Nurs J. 2009;31(No. 2):140–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gallion HR, Milam LJ, Littrel LL. Genital findings in cases of child sexual abuse: genital vs. vaginal penetration. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2016;29:604.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kogan SM. Disclosing unwanted sexual experiences: results from a national sample of adolescent women. Child Abus Negl. 2004;28:147–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Smith DW, Letourneau EJ, Saunders BE, Kilpatrick DG, Resnick HS, Best CL. Delay in disclosure of childhood rape: results from a national survey. Child Abus Negl. 2000;24:273–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Jenny C, Crawford-Jakubiak JE. Committee on Child Abuse and Neglect, American Academy of Pediatrics: the evaluation of children in the primary care setting when sexual abuse is suspected. Pediatrics. 2013;132:e558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Finkel MA, Alexander RA. Conducting the medical history. J Child Sex Abus. 2011;20:486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Melville JD, Kellogg ND, Perez N, Lukegahr JLL. Assessment for self-blame and trauma symptoms during the medical evaluation of suspected sexual abuse. Child Abus Negl. 2014;38:851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Adams JA. Medical evaluation of suspected child sexual abuse: 2011 update. J Child Sex Abus. 2011;20:588–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. DeLago C, Deblinger E, Schroeder C, Finkel M. Girls who disclose sexual abuse: urogenital symptoms and signs after genital contact. Pediatrics. 2008;122:281–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. World Health Organisation. WHO | Guidelines for medico-legal care for victims of sexual violence [https://www.who.int/violence_injury_prevention/publications/violence/med_leg_guidelines/en/t]

  11. Berkoff MC, Zolotor AJ, Makoroff KL, Thackeray JD, Shapiro RA, Runyan DK. Has this prepubertal girl been sexually abused? JAMA. 2008;300:2779–92

  12. Adams JA, Harper K, Knudson S. A proposed system for the classification of anogenital findings in children with suspected sexual abuse. Adolesc Pediatr Gynecol. 1992;5:73–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Adams JA, Farst KJ, Kellog ND. Interpretation of medical findings in suspected child sexual abuse: an update for 2018. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2018;31:225e231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Killough E, Spector L, Moffatt M, Wiebe J, Nielsen-Parker L, Anderst J. Diagnostic agreement when comparing still and video imaging for the evaluation of child sexual abuse. Child Abus Negl. 2016;52:102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kellogg N. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Child Abuse and Neglect: the evaluation of sexual abuse in children. Pediatrics. 2005;116:506–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. The Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health, Faculty of Forensic and Legal Medicine. Guidelines on paediatricforensic examinations in relation to possible child sexual abuse. October 2012, Review Date October 2015. https://fflm.ac.uk.

  17. Thackeray JD, Hornor G, Benzinger EA, Scribano PV. Forensic evidence collection and DNA identification in acute child sexual assault. Pediatrics. 2011;128:227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Girardet R, Bolton K, Lahoti S, Mowbray H, Giardino A, Isaac R, et al. Collection of forensic evidence from pediatric victims of sexual assault. Pediatrics. 2011;128:233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Christian CW. Timing of the medical examination. J Child. Sex Abus. 2011;20:505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. US Department of Justice. A national protocol for sexual assault medical forensic examinations adults/adolescents. Washington, DC: Office on Violence Against Women; 2013.

  21. Adams JA, Kellogg ND, Farst KJ, Harper NS, Palusci VJ, Frasier LD, et al. Updated guidelines for the medical assessment and care of children who may have been sexually abused. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2016;29:81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Danaher F, Vandeven A, Blanchard A, Newton AW. Recognizing, diagnosing, and preventing child maltreatment: an update for pediatric clinics. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2018;30:582–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Black CM, Driebe EM, Howard LA, Fajman NN, Sawyer MK, Girardet RG, et al. Multicenter study of nucleic acid amplification tests for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in children being evaluated for sexual abuse. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2009;28:608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Leder MR, Leber AL, Marcon MJ, Scribano PV. Use of Aptima Combo 2: the experience of a child advocacy center. J Child Sex Abus. 2013;22:297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Centers for Disease Control. Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines. https://www.cdc.gov/std/tg2015/default.htm; 2015

  26. Kellogg ND, Melville JD, Lukefahr JL, Nienow SM, Russel EL. Genital and extragenital gonorrhea and chlamydia in children and adolescents evaluated for sexual abuse. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2018;34:761–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hobbs MM, Sena AC. Modern diagnosis of Trichomonas vaginalis infection. Sex Transm Infect. 2013;89:434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Van Der Pol B. Clinical and laboratory testing for Trichomonas vaginalis infection. J Clin Microbiol. 2016;54:7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zichichi L, Maniascalco M. The challenges of a neglected STI: Molluscum contagiosum. G Ital Dermatol Venerol. 2012;147:447.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Bacopoulou F, Karakitsos P, Kottaridi C, Stefanaki C, Deligeoroglou E, Theodoridou K, et al. Genital HPV in children and adolescents: does sexual activity make a difference? J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2016;29:22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Practice Bulletin Summary No. 152: Emergency Contraception. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;126:685–6

  32. Havens PL. Committee on Pediatric AIDS: postexposure prophylaxis in children and adolescents for nonoccupational exposure to human immunodeficiency virus. Pediatrics. 2003;111:1475–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manuela Hiess.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hiess, M. Medical approach to children who may have been sexually abused—a narrative review. Int J Impot Res 33, 210–216 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-020-00353-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-020-00353-z

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links