Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review Article
  • Topical Collection - Digital Hypertension
  • Published:

Adopting artificial intelligence in cardiovascular medicine: a scoping review

Abstract

Recent years have witnessed significant transformations in cardiovascular medicine, driven by the rapid evolution of artificial intelligence (AI). This scoping review was conducted to capture the breadth of AI applications within cardiovascular science. Employing a structured approach, we sourced relevant articles from PubMed, with an emphasis on journals encompassing general cardiology and digital medicine. We applied filters to highlight cardiovascular articles published in journals focusing on general internal medicine, cardiology and digital medicine, thereby identifying the prevailing trends in the field. Following a comprehensive full-text screening, a total of 140 studies were identified. Over the preceding 5 years, cardiovascular medicine’s interplay with AI has seen an over tenfold augmentation. This expansive growth encompasses multiple cardiovascular subspecialties, including but not limited to, general cardiology, ischemic heart disease, heart failure, and arrhythmia. Deep learning emerged as the predominant methodology. The majority of AI endeavors in this domain have been channeled toward enhancing diagnostic and prognostic capabilities, utilizing resources such as hospital datasets, electrocardiograms, and echocardiography. A significant uptrend was observed in AI’s application for omics data analysis. However, a clear gap persists in AI’s full-scale integration into the clinical decision-making framework. AI, particularly deep learning, has demonstrated robust applications across cardiovascular subspecialties, indicating its transformative potential in this field. As we continue on this trajectory, ensuring the alignment of technological progress with medical ethics becomes crucial. The abundant digital health data today further accentuates the need for meticulous systematic reviews, tailoring them to each cardiovascular subspecialty.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. LeCun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G. Deep learning. Nature. 2015;521:436–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Silver D, Huang A, Maddison CJ, Guez A, Sifre L, van den Driessche G, et al. Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search. Nature. 2016;529:484–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Silver D, Hubert T, Schrittwieser J, Antonoglou I, Lai M, Guez A, et al. A general reinforcement learning algorithm that masters chess, shogi, and Go through self-play. Science. 2018;362:1140–4.

    Article  MathSciNet  CAS  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lake BM, Ullman TD, Tenenbaum JB, Gershman SJ. Building machines that learn and think like people. Behav Brain Sci. 2017;40:e253.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hosny A, Parmar C, Quackenbush J, Schwartz LH, Aerts HJWL. Artificial intelligence in radiology. Nat Rev Cancer. 2018;18:500–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Cannesson M, Tanabe M, Suffoletto MS, McNamara DM, Madan S, Lacomis JM, et al. A novel two-dimensional echocardiographic image analysis system using artificial intelligence-learned pattern recognition for rapid automated ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:217–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Narula S, Shameer K, Salem Omar AM, Dudley JT, Sengupta PP. Machine-learning algorithms to automate morphological and functional assessments in 2D echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68:2287–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Blecker S, Katz SD, Horwitz LI, Kuperman G, Park H, Gold A, et al. Comparison of approaches for heart failure case identification from electronic health record data. JAMA Cardiol. 2016;1:1014–20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Ambale-Venkatesh B, Yang X, Wu CO, Liu K, Hundley WG, McClelland R, et al. Cardiovascular event prediction by machine learning: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. Circ Res. 2017;121:1092–101.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Ong MS, Mullen MP, Austin ED, Szolovits P, Natter MD, Geva A, et al. Learning a comorbidity-driven taxonomy of pediatric pulmonary hypertension. Circ Res. 2017;121:341–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. McConnell MV, Shcherbina A, Pavlovic A, Homburger JR, Goldfeder RL, Waggot D, et al. Feasibility of obtaining measures of lifestyle from a smartphone app: the Myheart Counts Cardiovascular Health Study. JAMA Cardiol. 2017;2:67–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Frizzell JD, Liang L, Schulte PJ, Yancy CW, Heidenreich PA, Hernandez AF, et al. Prediction of 30-day all-cause readmissions in patients hospitalized for heart failure: comparison of machine learning and other statistical approaches. JAMA Cardiol. 2017;2:204–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Motwani M, Dey D, Berman DS, Germano G, Achenbach S, Al-Mallah MH, et al. Machine learning for prediction of all-cause mortality in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: a 5-year multicentre prospective registry analysis. Eur Heart J. 2017;38:500–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang J, Gajjala S, Agrawal P, Tison GH, Hallock LA, Beussink-Nelson L, et al. Fully automated echocardiogram interpretation in clinical practice. Circulation. 2018;138:1623–35.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Poh MZ, Poh YC, Chan PH, Wong CK, Pun L, Leung WW, et al. Diagnostic assessment of a deep learning system for detecting atrial fibrillation in pulse waveforms. Heart. 2018;104:1921–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sengupta PP, Kulkarni H, Narula J. Prediction of abnormal myocardial relaxation from signal processed surface ECG. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71:1650–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Madani A, Ong JR, Tibrewal A, Mofrad MRK. Deep echocardiography: data-efficient supervised and semi-supervised deep learning towards automated diagnosis of cardiac disease. NPJ Digital Med. 2018;1:59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Williams SA, Kivimaki M, Langenberg C, Hingorani AD, Casas JP, Bouchard C, et al. Plasma protein patterns as comprehensive indicators of health. Nat Med. 2019;25:1851–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Attia ZI, Noseworthy PA, Lopez-Jimenez F, Asirvatham SJ, Deshmukh AJ, Gersh BJ, et al. An artificial intelligence-enabled ECG algorithm for the identification of patients with atrial fibrillation during sinus rhythm: a retrospective analysis of outcome prediction. Lancet. 2019;394:861–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Galloway CD, Valys AV, Shreibati JB, Treiman DL, Petterson FL, Gundotra VP, et al. Development and validation of a deep-learning model to screen for hyperkalemia from the electrocardiogram. JAMA Cardiol. 2019;4:428–36.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Hannun AY, Rajpurkar P, Haghpanahi M, Tison GH, Bourn C, Turakhia MP, et al. Cardiologist-level arrhythmia detection and classification in ambulatory electrocardiograms using a deep neural network. Nat Med. 2019;25:65–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Attia ZI, Kapa S, Lopez-Jimenez F, McKie PM, Ladewig DJ, Satam G, et al. Screening for cardiac contractile dysfunction using an artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiogram. Nat Med. 2019;25:70–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Green EM, van Mourik R, Wolfus C, Heitner SB, Dur O, Semigran MJ. Machine learning detection of obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy using a wearable biosensor. NPJ Digital Med. 2019;2:57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kagiyama N, Piccirilli M, Yanamala N, Shrestha S, Farjo PD, Casaclang-Verzosa G, et al. Machine learning assessment of left ventricular diastolic function based on electrocardiographic features. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76:930–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ko WY, Siontis KC, Attia ZI, Carter RE, Kapa S, Ommen SR, et al. Detection of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy using a convolutional neural network-enabled electrocardiogram. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;75:722–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Commandeur F, Slomka PJ, Goeller M, Chen X, Cadet S, Razipour A, et al. Machine learning to predict the long-term risk of myocardial infarction and cardiac death based on clinical risk, coronary calcium, and epicardial adipose tissue: a prospective study. Cardiovasc Res. 2020;116:2216–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Al’Aref SJ, Maliakal G, Singh G, van Rosendael AR, Ma X, Xu Z, et al. Machine learning of clinical variables and coronary artery calcium scoring for the prediction of obstructive coronary artery disease on coronary computed tomography angiography: analysis from the CONFIRM registry. Eur Heart J. 2020;41:359–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Al-Zaiti S, Besomi L, Bouzid Z, Faramand Z, Frisch S, Martin-Gill C, et al. Machine learning-based prediction of acute coronary syndrome using only the pre-hospital 12-lead electrocardiogram. Nat Commun. 2020;11:3966.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. Raghunath S, Ulloa Cerna AE, Jing L, vanMaanen DP, Stough J, Hartzel DN, et al. Prediction of mortality from 12-lead electrocardiogram voltage data using a deep neural network. Nat Med. 2020;26:886–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Chirinos JA, Orlenko A, Zhao L, Basso MD, Cvijic ME, Li Z, et al. Multiple plasma biomarkers for risk stratification in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;75:1281–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Olin JW, Di Narzo AF, d’Escamard V, Kadian-Dodov D, Cheng H, Georges A, et al. A plasma proteogenomic signature for fibromuscular dysplasia. Cardiovasc Res. 2020;116:63–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Farjo PD, Yanamala N, Kagiyama N, Patel HB, Casaclang-Verzosa G, Nezarat N, et al. Prediction of coronary artery calcium scoring from surface electrocardiogram in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: a pilot study. Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2020;1:51–61.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Ward A, Sarraju A, Chung S, Li J, Harrington R, Heidenreich P, et al. Machine learning and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk prediction in a multi-ethnic population. NPJ Digital Med. 2020;3:125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Torres-Soto J, Ashley EA. Multi-task deep learning for cardiac rhythm detection in wearable devices. NPJ Digital Med. 2020;3:116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Pickhardt PJ, Graffy PM, Zea R, Lee SJ, Liu J, Sandfort V, et al. Automated CT biomarkers for opportunistic prediction of future cardiovascular events and mortality in an asymptomatic screening population: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Digit Health. 2020;2:e192–200.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Huang SC, Kothari T, Banerjee I, Chute C, Ball RL, Borus N, et al. PENet-a scalable deep-learning model for automated diagnosis of pulmonary embolism using volumetric CT imaging. NPJ Digital Med. 2020;3:61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Ouyang D, He B, Ghorbani A, Yuan N, Ebinger J, Langlotz CP, et al. Video-based AI for beat-to-beat assessment of cardiac function. Nature. 2020;580:252–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  ADS  Google Scholar 

  38. Hughes JW, Olgin JE, Avram R, Abreau SA, Sittler T, Radia K, et al. Performance of a convolutional neural network and explainability technique for 12-lead electrocardiogram interpretation. JAMA Cardiol. 2021;6:1285–95.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Rusin CG, Acosta SI, Vu EL, Ahmed M, Brady KM, Penny DJ. Automated prediction of cardiorespiratory deterioration in patients with single ventricle. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021;77:3184–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Yao X, Rushlow DR, Inselman JW, McCoy RG, Thacher TD, Behnken EM, et al. Artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiograms for identification of patients with low ejection fraction: a pragmatic, randomized clinical trial. Nat Med. 2021;27:815–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Oikonomou EK, Van Dijk D, Parise H, Suchard MA, de Lemos J, Antoniades C, et al. A phenomapping-derived tool to personalize the selection of anatomical vs. functional testing in evaluating chest pain (ASSIST). Eur Heart J. 2021;42:2536–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Segar MW, Jaeger BC, Patel KV, Nambi V, Ndumele CE, Correa A, et al. Development and validation of machine learning-based race-specific models to predict 10-year risk of heart failure: a multicohort analysis. Circulation. 2021;143:2370–83.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Cohen-Shelly M, Attia ZI, Friedman PA, Ito S, Essayagh BA, Ko WY, et al. Electrocardiogram screening for aortic valve stenosis using artificial intelligence. Eur Heart J. 2021;42:2885–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Khera R, Haimovich J, Hurley NC, McNamara R, Spertus JA, Desai N, et al. Use of machine learning models to predict death after acute myocardial infarction. JAMA Cardiol. 2021;6:633–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Bos JM, Attia ZI, Albert DE, Noseworthy PA, Friedman PA, Ackerman MJ. Use of artificial intelligence and deep neural networks in evaluation of patients with electrocardiographically concealed long QT syndrome from the surface 12-lead electrocardiogram. JAMA Cardiol. 2021;6:532–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Giudicessi JR, Schram M, Bos JM, Galloway CD, Shreibati JB, Johnson PW, et al. Artificial intelligence-enabled assessment of the heart rate corrected QT interval using a mobile electrocardiogram device. Circulation. 2021;143:1274–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Wittenbecher C, Eichelmann F, Toledo E, Guasch-Ferré M, Ruiz-Canela M, Li J, et al. Lipid profiles and heart failure risk: results from two prospective studies. Circ Res. 2021;128:309–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Rogers AJ, Selvalingam A, Alhusseini MI, Krummen DE, Corrado C, Abuzaid F, et al. Machine learned cellular phenotypes in cardiomyopathy predict sudden death. Circ Res. 2021;128:172–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Shad R, Quach N, Fong R, Kasinpila P, Bowles C, Castro M, et al. Predicting post-operative right ventricular failure using video-based deep learning. Nat Commun. 2021;12:5192.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  ADS  Google Scholar 

  50. Goto S, Mahara K, Beussink-Nelson L, Ikura H, Katsumata Y, Endo J, et al. Artificial intelligence-enabled fully automated detection of cardiac amyloidosis using electrocardiograms and echocardiograms. Nat Commun. 2021;12:2726.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  ADS  Google Scholar 

  51. Zeleznik R, Foldyna B, Eslami P, Weiss J, Alexander I, Taron J, et al. Deep convolutional neural networks to predict cardiovascular risk from computed tomography. Nat Commun. 2021;12:715.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  ADS  Google Scholar 

  52. Chao H, Shan H, Homayounieh F, Singh R, Khera RD, Guo H, et al. Deep learning predicts cardiovascular disease risks from lung cancer screening low dose computed tomography. Nat Commun. 2021;12:2963.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  ADS  Google Scholar 

  53. Peyster EG, Arabyarmohammadi S, Janowczyk A, Azarianpour-Esfahani S, Sekulic M, Cassol C, et al. An automated computational image analysis pipeline for histological grading of cardiac allograft rejection. Eur Heart J. 2021;42:2356–69.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Huda A, Castaño A, Niyogi A, Schumacher J, Stewart M, Bruno M, et al. A machine learning model for identifying patients at risk for wild-type transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy. Nat Commun. 2021;12:2725.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  ADS  Google Scholar 

  55. Raghunath S, Pfeifer JM, Ulloa-Cerna AE, Nemani A, Carbonati T, Jing L, et al. Deep neural networks can predict new-onset atrial fibrillation from the 12-lead ECG and help identify those at risk of atrial fibrillation-related stroke. Circulation. 2021;143:1287–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Somani SS, Honarvar H, Narula S, Landi I, Lee S, Khachatoorian Y, et al. Development of a machine learning model using electrocardiogram signals to improve acute pulmonary embolism screening. Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2021;3:56–66.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Akbilgic O, Butler L, Karabayir I, Chang PP, Kitzman DW, Alonso A, et al. ECG-AI: electrocardiographic artificial intelligence model for prediction of heart failure. Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2021;2:626–34.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Adedinsewo DA, Johnson PW, Douglass EJ, Attia IZ, Phillips SD, Goswami RM, et al. Detecting cardiomyopathies in pregnancy and the postpartum period with an electrocardiogram-based deep learning model. Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2021;2:586–96.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Ahmad A, Shelly-Cohen M, Corban MT, Murphree DH Jr, Toya T, Sara JD, et al. Machine learning aids clinical decision-making in patients presenting with angina and non-obstructive coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2021;2:597–605.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Chen Z, Rigolli M, Vigneault DM, Kligerman S, Hahn L, Narezkina A, et al. Automated cardiac volume assessment and cardiac long- and short-axis imaging plane prediction from electrocardiogram-gated computed tomography volumes enabled by deep learning. Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2021;2:311–22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Eng D, Chute C, Khandwala N, Rajpurkar P, Long J, Shleifer S, et al. Automated coronary calcium scoring using deep learning with multicenter external validation. NPJ Digital Med. 2021;4:88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Forrest IS, Petrazzini BO, Duffy Á, Park JK, Marquez-Luna C, Jordan DM, et al. Machine learning-based marker for coronary artery disease: derivation and validation in two longitudinal cohorts. Lancet. 2023;401:215–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Attia ZI, Harmon DM, Dugan J, Manka L, Lopez-Jimenez F, Lerman A, et al. Prospective evaluation of smartwatch-enabled detection of left ventricular dysfunction. Nat Med. 2022;28:2497–503.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Inoue K, Seeman TE, Horwich T, Budoff MJ, Watson KE. Heterogeneity in the association between the presence of coronary artery calcium and cardiovascular events: a machine-learning approach in the MESA study. Circulation. 2023;147:132–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Noseworthy PA, Attia ZI, Behnken EM, Giblon RE, Bews KA, Liu S, et al. Artificial intelligence-guided screening for atrial fibrillation using electrocardiogram during sinus rhythm: a prospective non-randomised interventional trial. Lancet. 2022;400:1206–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Bhattacharyya S, Duan J, Vela RJ, Bhakta M, Bajona P, Mammen PPA, et al. Accurate classification of cardiomyopathy diagnosis by chromatin accessibility. Circulation. 2022;146:878–81.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Elias P, Poterucha TJ, Rajaram V, Moller LM, Rodriguez V, Bhave S, et al. Deep learning electrocardiographic analysis for detection of left-sided valvular heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022;80:613–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Nekoui M, Pirruccello JP, Di Achille P, Choi SH, Friedman SN, Nauffal V, et al. Spatially distinct genetic determinants of aortic dimensions influence risks of aneurysm and stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022;80:486–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Segar MW, Hall JL, Jhund PS, Powell-Wiley TM, Morris AA, Kao D, et al. Machine learning-based models incorporating social determinants of health vs traditional models for predicting in-hospital mortality in patients with heart failure. JAMA Cardiol. 2022;7:844–54.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Liang LW, Raita Y, Hasegawa K, Fifer MA, Maurer MS, Reilly MP, et al. Proteomics profiling reveals a distinct high-risk molecular subtype of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Heart. 2022;108:1807–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Lipkova J, Chen TY, Lu MY, Chen RJ, Shady M, Williams M, et al. Deep learning-enabled assessment of cardiac allograft rejection from endomyocardial biopsies. Nat Med. 2022;28:575–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Duffy G, Cheng PP, Yuan N, He B, Kwan AC, Shun-Shin MJ, et al. High-throughput precision phenotyping of left ventricular hypertrophy with cardiovascular deep learning. JAMA Cardiol. 2022;7:386–95.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Li C, Qu L, Matz AJ, Murphy PA, Liu Y, Manichaikul AW, et al. AtheroSpectrum reveals novel macrophage foam cell gene signatures associated with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk. Circulation. 2022;145:206–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Khurshid S, Friedman S, Reeder C, Di Achille P, Diamant N, Singh P, et al. ECG-based deep learning and clinical risk factors to predict atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2022;145:122–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Rios R, Miller RJH, Hu LH, Otaki Y, Singh A, Diniz M, et al. Determining a minimum set of variables for machine learning cardiovascular event prediction: results from REFINE SPECT registry. Cardiovasc Res. 2022;118:2152–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Sangha V, Mortazavi BJ, Haimovich AD, Ribeiro AH, Brandt CA, Jacoby DL, et al. Automated multilabel diagnosis on electrocardiographic images and signals. Nat Commun. 2022;13:1583.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  ADS  Google Scholar 

  77. Ulloa-Cerna AE, Jing L, Pfeifer JM, Raghunath S, Ruhl JA, Rocha DB, et al. rECHOmmend: an ECG-based machine learning approach for identifying patients at increased risk of undiagnosed structural heart disease detectable by echocardiography. Circulation. 2022;146:36–47.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. Peyster EG, Janowczyk A, Swamidoss A, Kethireddy S, Feldman MD, Margulies KB. Computational analysis of routine biopsies improves diagnosis and prediction of cardiac allograft vasculopathy. Circulation. 2022;145:1563–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. Petrazzini BO, Chaudhary K, Márquez-Luna C, Forrest IS, Rocheleau G, Cho J, et al. Coronary risk estimation based on clinical data in electronic health records. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022;79:1155–66.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. Tison GH, Siontis KC, Abreau S, Attia Z, Agarwal P, Balasubramanyam A, et al. Assessment of disease status and treatment response with artificial intelligence-enhanced electrocardiography in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022;79:1032–4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. Singh JP, Fontanarava J, de Massé G, Carbonati T, Li J, Henry C, et al. Short-term prediction of atrial fibrillation from ambulatory monitoring ECG using a deep neural network. Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2022;3:208–17.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Soto JT, Weston Hughes J, Sanchez PA, Perez M, Ouyang D, Ashley EA. Multimodal deep learning enhances diagnostic precision in left ventricular hypertrophy. Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2022;3:380–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. Attia ZI, Dugan J, Rideout A, Maidens JN, Venkatraman S, Guo L, et al. Automated detection of low ejection fraction from a one-lead electrocardiogram: application of an AI algorithm to an electrocardiogram-enabled Digital Stethoscope. Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2022;3:373–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. Yagi R, Goto S, Katsumata Y, MacRae CA, Deo RC. Importance of external validation and subgroup analysis of artificial intelligence in the detection of low ejection fraction from electrocardiograms. Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2022;3:654–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. Heindel P, Dey T, Feliz JD, Hentschel DM, Bhatt DL, Al-Omran M, et al. Predicting radiocephalic arteriovenous fistula success with machine learning. NPJ Digital Med. 2022;5:160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Lin A, Manral N, McElhinney P, Killekar A, Matsumoto H, Kwiecinski J, et al. Deep learning-enabled coronary CT angiography for plaque and stenosis quantification and cardiac risk prediction: an international multicentre study. Lancet Digit Health. 2022;4:e256–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  87. Kurz DJ, Bernstein A, Hunt K, Radovanovic D, Erne P, Siudak Z, et al. Simple point-of-care risk stratification in acute coronary syndromes: the AMIS model. Heart. 2009;95:662–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Ammirati E, Cannistraci CV, Cristell NA, Vecchio V, Palini AG, Tornvall P, et al. Identification and predictive value of interleukin-6+ interleukin-10+ and interleukin-6- interleukin-10+ cytokine patterns in ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction. Circ Res. 2012;111:1336–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Oikonomou EK, Williams MC, Kotanidis CP, Desai MY, Marwan M, Antonopoulos AS, et al. A novel machine learning-derived radiotranscriptomic signature of perivascular fat improves cardiac risk prediction using coronary CT angiography. Eur Heart J. 2019;40:3529–43.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  90. Diller GP, Kempny A, Babu-Narayan SV, Henrichs M, Brida M, Uebing A, et al. Machine learning algorithms estimating prognosis and guiding therapy in adult congenital heart disease: data from a single tertiary centre including 10 019 patients. Eur Heart J. 2019;40:1069–77.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  91. Chua W, Purmah Y, Cardoso VR, Gkoutos GV, Tull SP, Neculau G, et al. Data-driven discovery and validation of circulating blood-based biomarkers associated with prevalent atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J. 2019;40:1268–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  92. Rawshani A, Rawshani A, Sattar N, Franzén S, McGuire DK, Eliasson B, et al. Relative prognostic importance and optimal levels of risk factors for mortality and cardiovascular outcomes in type 1 diabetes mellitus. Circulation. 2019;139:1900–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Li Y, Sperrin M, Ashcroft DM, van Staa TP. Consistency of variety of machine learning and statistical models in predicting clinical risks of individual patients: longitudinal cohort study using cardiovascular disease as exemplar. BMJ. 2020;371:m3919.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  94. Sánchez-Cabo F, Rossello X, Fuster V, Benito F, Manzano JP, Silla JC, et al. Machine learning improves cardiovascular risk definition for young, asymptomatic individuals. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76:1674–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Hoogeveen RM, Pereira JPB, Nurmohamed NS, Zampoleri V, Bom MJ, Baragetti A, et al. Improved cardiovascular risk prediction using targeted plasma proteomics in primary prevention. Eur Heart J. 2020;41:3998–4007.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  96. Verhaar BJH, Collard D, Prodan A, Levels JHM, Zwinderman AH, Bäckhed F, et al. Associations between gut microbiota, faecal short-chain fatty acids, and blood pressure across ethnic groups: the HELIUS study. Eur Heart J. 2020;41:4259–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  97. Tokodi M, Schwertner WR, Kovács A, Tősér Z, Staub L, Sárkány A, et al. Machine learning-based mortality prediction of patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy: the SEMMELWEIS-CRT score. Eur Heart J. 2020;41:1747–56.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  98. Diller GP, Orwat S, Vahle J, Bauer UMM, Urban A, Sarikouch S, et al. Prediction of prognosis in patients with tetralogy of Fallot based on deep learning imaging analysis. Heart. 2020;106:1007–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Galli V, Loncaric F, Rocatello G, Astudillo P, Sanchis L, Regueiro A, et al. Towards patient-specific prediction of conduction abnormalities induced by transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a combined mechanistic modelling and machine learning approach. Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2021;2:606–15.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  100. Kainz B, Heinrich MP, Makropoulos A, Oppenheimer J, Mandegaran R, Sankar S, et al. Non-invasive diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis from ultrasound imaging with machine learning. NPJ Digital Med. 2021;4:137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Dolezalova N, Reed AB, Despotovic A, Obika BD, Morelli D, Aral M, et al. Development of an accessible 10-year Digital CArdioVAscular (DiCAVA) risk assessment: a UK Biobank study. Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2021;2:528–38.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  102. Augusto JB, Davies RH, Bhuva AN, Knott KD, Seraphim A, Alfarih M, et al. Diagnosis and risk stratification in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy using machine learning wall thickness measurement: a comparison with human test-retest performance. Lancet Digit Health. 2021;3:e20–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Giang KW, Helgadottir S, Dellborg M, Volpe G, Mandalenakis Z. Enhanced prediction of atrial fibrillation and mortality among patients with congenital heart disease using nationwide register-based medical hospital data and neural networks. Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2021;2:568–75.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  104. Verdonschot JAJ, Merlo M, Dominguez F, Wang P, Henkens MTHM, Adriaens ME, et al. Phenotypic clustering of dilated cardiomyopathy patients highlights important pathophysiological differences. Eur Heart J. 2021;42:162–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Overmars LM, van Es B, Groepenhoff F, De Groot MCH, Pasterkamp G, den Ruijter HM, et al. Preventing unnecessary imaging in patients suspect of coronary artery disease through machine learning of electronic health records. Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2021;3:11–19.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  106. Vranken JF, van de Leur RR, Gupta DK, Juarez Orozco LE, Hassink RJ, van der Harst P, et al. Uncertainty estimation for deep learning-based automated analysis of 12-lead electrocardiograms. Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2021;2:401–15.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  107. D’Ascenzo F, De Filippo O, Gallone G, Mittone G, Deriu MA, Iannaccone M, et al. Machine learning-based prediction of adverse events following an acute coronary syndrome (PRAISE): a modelling study of pooled datasets. Lancet. 2021;397:199–207.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. Unterhuber M, Kresoja KP, Rommel KP, Besler C, Baragetti A, Klöting N, et al. Proteomics-enabled deep learning machine algorithms can enhance prediction of mortality. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021;78:1621–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Schuwerk R, Freitag-Wolf S, Krupickova S, Gabbert DD, Uebing A, Langguth P, et al. Ventricular and atrial function and deformation is largely preserved after arterial switch operation. Heart. 2021;107:1644–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. Unterhuber M, Rommel KP, Kresoja KP, Lurz J, Kornej J, Hindricks G, et al. Deep learning detects heart failure with preserved ejection fraction using a baseline electrocardiogram. Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2021;2:699–703.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  111. Prifti E, Fall A, Davogustto G, Pulini A, Denjoy I, Funck-Brentano C, et al. Deep learning analysis of electrocardiogram for risk prediction of drug-induced arrhythmias and diagnosis of long QT syndrome. Eur Heart J. 2021;42:3948–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. Schrutka L, Anner P, Agibetov A, Seirer B, Dusik F, Rettl R, et al. Machine learning-derived electrocardiographic algorithm for the detection of cardiac amyloidosis. Heart. 2022;108:1137–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Tayal U, Verdonschot JAJ, Hazebroek MR, Howard J, Gregson J, Newsome S, et al. Precision phenotyping of dilated cardiomyopathy using multidimensional data. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022;79:2219–32.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  114. Alabed S, Uthoff J, Zhou S, Garg P, Dwivedi K, Alandejani F, et al. Machine learning cardiac-MRI features predict mortality in newly diagnosed pulmonary arterial hypertension. Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2022;3:265–75.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  115. Hill NR, Groves L, Dickerson C, Ochs A, Pang D, Lawton S, et al. Identification of undiagnosed atrial fibrillation using a machine learning risk-prediction algorithm and diagnostic testing (PULsE-AI) in primary care: a multi-centre randomized controlled trial in England. Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2022;3:195–204.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  116. Sau A, Ibrahim S, Ahmed A, Handa B, Kramer DB, Waks JW, et al. Artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiogram to distinguish cavotricuspid isthmus dependence from other atrial tachycardia mechanisms. Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2022;3:405–14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  117. Li Y, Salimi-Khorshidi G, Rao S, Canoy D, Hassaine A, Lukasiewicz T, et al. Validation of risk prediction models applied to longitudinal electronic health record data for the prediction of major cardiovascular events in the presence of data shifts. Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2022;3:535–47.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  118. Doudesis D, Lee KK, Yang J, Wereski R, Shah ASV, Tsanas A, et al. Validation of the myocardial-ischaemic-injury-index machine learning algorithm to guide the diagnosis of myocardial infarction in a heterogenous population: a prespecified exploratory analysis. Lancet Digit Health. 2022;4:e300–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  119. Bachtiger P, Petri CF, Scott FE, Ri Park S, Kelshiker MA, Sahemey HK, et al. Point-of-care screening for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction using artificial intelligence during ECG-enabled stethoscope examination in London, UK: a prospective, observational, multicentre study. Lancet Digit Health. 2022;4:e117–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  120. Wenzl FA, Kraler S, Ambler G, Weston C, Herzog SA, Räber L, et al. Sex-specific evaluation and redevelopment of the GRACE score in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes in populations from the UK and Switzerland: a multinational analysis with external cohort validation. Lancet. 2022;400:744–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  121. Laumer F, Di Vece D, Cammann VL, Würdinger M, Petkova V, Schönberger M, et al. Assessment of artificial intelligence in echocardiography diagnostics in differentiating Takotsubo syndrome from myocardial infarction. JAMA Cardiol. 2022;7:494–503.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  122. Nurmohamed NS, Belo Pereira JP, Hoogeveen RM, Kroon J, Kraaijenhof JM, Waissi F, et al. Targeted proteomics improves cardiovascular risk prediction in secondary prevention. Eur Heart J. 2022;43:1569–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  123. van de Leur RR, Bos MN, Taha K, Sammani A, Yeung MW, van Duijvenboden S, et al. Improving explainability of deep neural network-based electrocardiogram interpretation using variational auto-encoders. Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2022;3:390–404.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  124. Werfel S, Günthner R, Hapfelmeier A, Hanssen H, Kotliar K, Heemann U, et al. Identification of cardiovascular high-risk groups from dynamic retinal vessel signals using untargeted machine learning. Cardiovasc Res. 2022;118:612–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  125. König S, Pellissier V, Hohenstein S, Leiner J, Meier-Hellmann A, Kuhlen R, et al. From population- to patient-based prediction of in-hospital mortality in heart failure using machine learning. Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2022;3:307–10.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  126. Makimoto H, Shiraga T, Kohlmann B, Magnisali CE, Gerguri S, Motoyama N, et al. Efficient screening for severe aortic valve stenosis using understandable artificial intelligence: a prospective diagnostic accuracy study. Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2022;3:141–52.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  127. Kwon JM, Cho Y, Jeon KH, Cho S, Kim KH, Baek SD, et al. A deep learning algorithm to detect anaemia with ECGs: a retrospective, multicentre study. Lancet Digit Health. 2020;2:e358–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  128. Choi DJ, Park JJ, Ali T, Lee S. Artificial intelligence for the diagnosis of heart failure. NPJ Digital Med. 2020;3:54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  129. Toba S, Mitani Y, Yodoya N, Ohashi H, Sawada H, Hayakawa H, et al. Prediction of pulmonary to systemic flow ratio in patients with congenital heart disease using deep learning-based analysis of chest radiographs. JAMA Cardiol. 2020;5:449–57.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  130. Lin S, Li Z, Fu B, Chen S, Li X, Wang Y, et al. Feasibility of using deep learning to detect coronary artery disease based on facial photo. Eur Heart J. 2020;41:4400–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  131. Yan BP, Lai WHS, Chan CKY, Au ACK, Freedman B, Poh YC, et al. High-throughput, contact-free detection of atrial fibrillation from video with deep learning. JAMA Cardiol. 2020;5:105–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  132. Zhu H, Cheng C, Yin H, Li X, Zuo P, Ding J, et al. Automatic multilabel electrocardiogram diagnosis of heart rhythm or conduction abnormalities with deep learning: a cohort study. Lancet Digit Health. 2020;2:e348–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  133. Loh R, Yeo SY, Tan RS, Gao F, Koh AS. Explainable machine learning predictions to support personalized cardiology strategies. Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2021;3:49–55.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  134. Kwak S, Everett RJ, Treibel TA, Yang S, Hwang D, Ko T, et al. Markers of myocardial damage predict mortality in patients with aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021;78:545–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  135. Rim TH, Lee CJ, Tham YC, Cheung N, Yu M, Lee G, et al. Deep-learning-based cardiovascular risk stratification using coronary artery calcium scores predicted from retinal photographs. Lancet Digit Health. 2021;3:e306–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  136. Nakamura K, Kojima R, Uchino E, Ono K, Yanagita M, Murashita K, et al. Health improvement framework for actionable treatment planning using a surrogate Bayesian model. Nat Commun. 2021;12:3088.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  ADS  Google Scholar 

  137. Chang KC, Hsieh PH, Wu MY, Wang YC, Wei JT, Shih ESC, et al. Usefulness of multi-labelling artificial intelligence in detecting rhythm disorders and acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction on 12-lead electrocardiogram. Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2021;2:299–310.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  138. Tromp J, Seekings PJ, Hung CL, Iversen MB, Frost MJ, Ouwerkerk W, et al. Automated interpretation of systolic and diastolic function on the echocardiogram: a multicohort study. Lancet Digit Health. 2022;4:e46–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  139. Shih LC, Wang YC, Hung MH, Cheng H, Shiao YC, Tseng YH, et al. Prediction of white-coat hypertension and white-coat uncontrolled hypertension using machine learning algorithm. Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2022;3:559–69.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  140. Lin C, Chau T, Lin CS, Shang HS, Fang WH, Lee DJ, et al. Point-of-care artificial intelligence-enabled ECG for dyskalemia: a retrospective cohort analysis for accuracy and outcome prediction. NPJ Digital Med. 2022;5:8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  141. Choi B, Jang JH, Son M, Lee MS, Jo YY, Jeon JY, et al. Electrocardiographic biomarker based on machine learning for detecting overt hyperthyroidism. Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2022;3:255–64.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  142. Than MP, Pickering JW, Sandoval Y, Shah ASV, Tsanas A, Apple FS, et al. Machine learning to predict the likelihood of acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2019;140:899–909.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  143. Ribeiro AH, Ribeiro MH, Paixão GMM, Oliveira DM, Gomes PR, Canazart JA, et al. Automatic diagnosis of the 12-lead ECG using a deep neural network. Nat Commun. 2020;11:1760.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  ADS  Google Scholar 

  144. Lima EM, Ribeiro AH, Paixão GMM, Ribeiro MH, Pinto-Filho MM, Gomes PR, et al. Deep neural network-estimated electrocardiographic age as a mortality predictor. Nat Commun. 2021;12:5117.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  ADS  Google Scholar 

  145. Biton S, Gendelman S, Ribeiro AH, Miana G, Moreira C, Ribeiro ALP, et al. Atrial fibrillation risk prediction from the 12-lead electrocardiogram using digital biomarkers and deep representation learning. Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2021;2:576–85.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  146. Fabritz L, Connolly DL, Czarnecki E, Dudek D, Guasch E, Haase D, et al. Smartphone and wearable detected atrial arrhythmias in older adults: results of a fully digital European case finding study. Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2022;3:610–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  147. Perez MV, Mahaffey KW, Hedlin H, Rumsfeld JS, Garcia A, Ferris T, et al. Large-scale assessment of a smartwatch to identify atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:1909–17.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  148. Lubitz SA, Faranesh AZ, Selvaggi C, Atlas SJ, McManus DD, Singer DE, et al. Detection of atrial fibrillation in a large population using wearable devices: the Fitbit Heart Study. Circulation. 2022;146:1415–24.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  149. Oikonomou EK, Spatz ES, Suchard MA, Khera R. Individualising intensive systolic blood pressure reduction in hypertension using computational trial phenomaps and machine learning: a post-hoc analysis of randomised clinical trials. Lancet Digit Health. 2022;4:e796–805.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  150. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration. Clinical Decision Support Software—Guidance for industry and food and drug administration staff. 2023. https://www.fda.gov/media/109618/download.

  151. Kung TH, Cheatham M, Medenilla A, Sillos C, De Leon L, Elepaño C, et al. Performance of ChatGPT on USMLE: potential for AI-assisted medical education using large language models. PLoS Digit Health. 2023;2:e0000198.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  152. Ayers JW, Poliak A, Dredze M, Leas EC, Zhu Z, Kelley JB, et al. Comparing physician and artificial intelligence chatbot responses to patient questions posted to a public social media forum. JAMA Intern Med. 2023;183:589–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  153. Makimoto H, Höckmann M, Lin T, Glöckner D, Gerguri S, Clasen L, et al. Performance of a convolutional neural network derived from an ECG database in recognizing myocardial infarction. Sci Rep. 2020;10:8445.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  ADS  Google Scholar 

  154. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Health Canada, and the United Kingdom’s Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA). Good machine learning practice for medical device development: guiding principles. 2023. https://www.fda.gov/media/153486/download.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hisaki Makimoto.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Makimoto, H., Kohro, T. Adopting artificial intelligence in cardiovascular medicine: a scoping review. Hypertens Res 47, 685–699 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41440-023-01469-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41440-023-01469-7

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links