Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Feasibility and measurement stability of smartwatch-based cuffless blood pressure monitoring: A real-world prospective observational study

A Comment to this article was published on 04 April 2023

Abstract

Cuffless wearable devices are currently being developed for long-term monitoring of blood pressure (BP) in patients with hypertension and in apparently healthy people. This study evaluated the feasibility and measurement stability of smartwatch-based cuffless BP monitoring in real-world conditions. Users of the first smartwatch-based cuffless BP monitor approved in Korea (Samsung Galaxy Watch) were invited to upload their data from using the device for 4 weeks post calibration. A total of 760 participants (mean age 43.7 ± 11.9, 80.3% men) provided 35,797 BP readings (average monitoring 22 ± 4 days [SD]; average readings 47 ± 42 per participant [median 36]). Each participant obtained 1.5 ± 1.3 readings/day and 19.7% of the participants obtained measurements every day. BP showed considerable variability, mainly depending on the day and time of the measurement. There was a trend towards higher BP levels on Mondays than on other days of the week and on workdays than in weekends. BP readings taken between 00:00 and 04:00 tended to be the lowest, whereas those between 12:00 and 16:00 the highest. The average pre-post calibration error for systolic BP (difference in 7-day BP before and after calibration), was 6.8 ± 5.6 mmHg, and was increased with higher systolic BP levels before calibration. Smartwatch-based cuffless BP monitoring is feasible for out-of-office monitoring in the real-world setting. The stability of BP measurement post calibration and the standardization and optimal time interval for recalibration need further investigation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lee HY, Oh GC, Sohn IS, Park S, Shin J, Beaney T, et al. May Measurement Month 2019: An analysis of blood pressure screening results from Korea. Eur Heart J Suppl. 2021;23:B89–B91.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Lee HY, Oh GC, Sohn IS, Park S, Shin J, Pyun WB, et al. Suboptimal management status of younger hypertensive population in Korea. Korean Circ J. 2021;51:598–606.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Mehlum MH, Liestol K, Kjeldsen SE, Julius S, Hua TA, Rothwell PM, et al. Blood pressure variability and risk of cardiovascular events and death in patients with hypertension and different baseline risks. Eur Heart J. 2018;39:2243–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Weber MA. Blood pressure variability and cardiovascular prognosis: Implications for clinical practice. Eur Heart J. 2017;38:2823–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Vidal-Petiot E, Stebbins A, Chiswell K, Ardissino D, Aylward PE, Cannon CP, et al. Visit-to-visit variability of blood pressure and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with stable coronary heart disease. Insights from the STABILITY trial. Eur Heart J. 2017;38:2813–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sega R, Cesana G, Bombelli M, Grassi G, Stella ML, Zanchetti A, et al. Seasonal variations in home and ambulatory blood pressure in the PAMELA population. Pressione Arteriose Monitorate E Loro Associazioni. J Hypertens. 1998;16:1585–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim KI, Nikzad N, Quer G, Wineinger NE, Vegreville M, Normand A, et al. Real World home blood pressure variability in over 56,000 individuals with nearly 17 million measurements. Am J Hypertens. 2018;31:566–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bell K, Doust J, McGeechan K, Horvath AR, Barratt A, Hayen A, et al. The potential for overdiagnosis and underdiagnosis because of blood pressure variability: A comparison of the 2017 ACC/AHA, 2018 ESC/ESH and 2019 NICE hypertension guidelines. J Hypertens. 2021;39:236–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Silver L. Smartphone ownership is growing rapidly around the world, but Not Always Equally. Washington, DC, USA: Pew Research Center; 2019. p. Report.

  10. Luo H, Yang D, Barszczyk A, Vempala N, Wei J, Wu SJ, et al. Smartphone-based blood pressure measurement using transdermal optical imaging technology. Circ Cardiovasc imaging. 2019;12:e008857.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Stergiou GS, Alpert B, Mieke S, Asmar R, Atkins N, Eckert S, et al. A Universal standard for the validation of blood pressure measuring devices: Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation/European Society of Hypertension/International Organization for Standardization (AAMI/ESH/ISO) collaboration statement. Hypertension. 2018;71:368–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Vybornova A, Polychronopoulou E, Wurzner-Ghajarzadeh A, Fallet S, Sola J, Wuerzner G. Blood pressure from the optical Aktiia Bracelet: A 1-month validation study using an extended ISO81060-2 protocol adapted for a cuffless wrist device. Blood Press Monit. 2021;26:305–11.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee HY, Lee DJ, Seo J, Ihm SH, Kim KI, Cho EJ, et al. Smartphone/smartwatch-based cuffless blood pressure measurement: A position paper from the Korean Society of Hypertension. Clin Hypertens. 2021;27:4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Kuwabara M, Harada K, Hishiki Y, Kario K. Validation of two watch-type wearable blood pressure monitors according to the ANSI/AAMI/ISO81060-2:2013 guidelines: Omron HEM-6410T-ZM and HEM-6410T-ZL. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2019;21:853–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kario K, Shimbo D, Tomitani N, Kanegae H, Schwartz JE, Williams B. The first study comparing a wearable watch-type blood pressure monitor with a conventional ambulatory blood pressure monitor on in-office and out-of-office settings. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2020;22:135–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Chandrasekaran V, Dantu R, Jonnada S, Thiyagaraja S, Subbu KP. Cuffless differential blood pressure estimation using smart phones. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2013;60:1080–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gaurav A, Maheedhar M, Tiwari VN, Narayanan R. Cuff-less PPG based continuous blood pressure monitoring: A smartphone based approach. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2016;2016:607–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Stergiou GS, Mukkamala R, Avolio A, Kyriakoulis KG, Mieke S, Murray A, et al. Cuffless blood pressure measuring devices: Review and statement by the European Society of hypertension working group on blood pressure monitoring and cardiovascular variability. J Hypertens. 2022;40:1449–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kim HC, Ihm SH, Kim GH, Kim JH, Kim KI, Lee HY, et al. 2018 Korean Society of Hypertension guidelines for the management of hypertension: Part I-epidemiology of hypertension. Clin Hypertens. 2019;25:16.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Verberk WJ, Kroon AA, Lenders JW, Kessels AG, van Montfrans GA, Smit AJ, et al. Self-measurement of blood pressure at home reduces the need for antihypertensive drugs: a randomized, controlled trial. Hypertension. 2007;50:1019–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Cappuccio FP, Kerry SM, Forbes L, Donald A. Blood pressure control by home monitoring: Meta-analysis of randomised trials. BMJ. 2004;329:145.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Little P, Barnett J, Barnsley L, Marjoram J, Fitzgerald-Barron A, Mant D. Comparison of acceptability of and preferences for different methods of measuring blood pressure in primary care. BMJ. 2002;325:258–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Kario K. Management of hypertension in the digital era: Small wearable monitoring devices for remote blood pressure monitoring. Hypertension. 2020;76:640–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

MH, YRL, and TP wrote the draft. SI and WBP, the present and the immediate-past presidents of KSH, supported this study on behalf of the KSH. All authors reviewed and edited the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. We thank Jongmin Choi and Sunok Jung (Samsung Electronics) for technical assistance in Galaxy Watch device instructions.

the Korean Society of Hypertension

Sang-Hyun Ihm5, Wook Bum Pyun6, Hae Young Lee1,2, Myeong-Chan Cho8

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Contributions

The authors indicated in parentheses made substantial contributions to the following tasks of research: initial conceptualization (WBP, HYL, JMS, TB); study design (HYL, JMS, TP); literature search and data collection (MH, SHI,HYL); data analysis (YRL, TP, JMS); data interpretation (MH, YRL, TP, JMS, HYL, TB, MCC, MC, EY, GSS); and writing (MH, YRL, TP). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. MH, YRL, and TP contributed equally to this work and share first authorship.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hae Young Lee.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

GSS has received honoraria for lectures at scientific symposia and for consulting services and research grants from several manufacturers of blood pressure monitoring technology including manufacturers of cuffless devices Aktiia SA, Maisense, and Samsung Research America, Inc. The other authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Han, M., Lee, YR., Park, T. et al. Feasibility and measurement stability of smartwatch-based cuffless blood pressure monitoring: A real-world prospective observational study. Hypertens Res 46, 922–931 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41440-023-01215-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41440-023-01215-z

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links