Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

The effect of heart rate on blood pressure measurement in patients with atrial fibrillation: a cross-sectional study

Hypertension Research volume 45, pages 1183–1192 (2022)Cite this article

A Comment to this article was published on 10 May 2022

Abstract

This study explored the effect of heart rate (HR) on the stability and accuracy of blood pressure (BP) measurement and the optimal HR range for the most accurate blood pressure measurement in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. A total of 583 patients (383 and 200 with AF and sinus rhythm (SR), respectively) were included in this study. The noninvasive blood pressure (NIBP), invasive blood pressure (IBP), and HR were repeatedly measured ten times at 30-second intervals for every patient. Both the AF and SR groups were then subdivided into five groups depending on the HR (i.e., < 60, 60–80, 80–100, 100–120, and ≥120 bpm). The difference between the IBP and NIBP (i.e., △SBP) and the coefficient of variation (CV) were calculated, and the stability and accuracy of NIBP measurements were analyzed. CV and △SBP were significantly higher in the AF group. In the AF group, the CV of NIBP was highest when the HR was ≥ 100 bpm; and △SBP was significantly lower in the HR groups with 60–80 and 80–100 bpm (< 60 bpm, △SBP 11.62 ± 2.64 mmHg; 60–80 bpm, △SBP 7.10 ± 1.92 mmHg; 80–100 bpm, △SBP 7.10 ± 2.95 mmHg; 100–120 bpm, △SBP 10.52 ± 2.72 mmHg; ≥120 bpm, △SBP 14.15 ± 3.61 mmHg, P < 0.05). The stability and accuracy of the NIBP in the SR groups were not affected by the HR. In AF patients, the NIBP stability was low when the HR was high, and the NIBP was often underestimated when the HR was high or low. Sixty to 100 bpm is the best HR range for measuring blood pressure in AF patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shengshou H, runlin G, Lisheng L, manlu Z, Wen W, Yongjun W, et al. 2018 summary of cardiovascular disease in China. Chinese. Circulation J. 2019;34:209–20.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kirchhof P, Benussi S, Kotecha D, Ahlsson A, Atar D, Casadei B, et al. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS. Eur Heart J. 2016;37:2893–962.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wiesel JAS, Messineo FC. Screening for asymptomatic atrial fibrillation while monitoring the blood pressure at home: trial of regular versus irregular pulse for prevention of stroke (TRIPPS 2.0). Am J Cardiol. 2013;111:1598–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Walker M, Patel P, Kwon O, Koene RJ, Duprez DA, Kwon Y. Atrial Fibrillation and Hypertension: “Quo Vadis”. Curr hypertension Rev. 2019;15:1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Arima H, Anderson C, Omae T, Woodward M, MacMahon S, Mancia G, et al. Effects of blood pressure lowering on intracranial and extracranial bleeding in patients on antithrombotic therapy: the PROGRESS trial. Stroke. 2012;43:1675–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Joint Committee for Guideline R. 2018 Chinese Guidelines for Prevention and Treatment of Hypertension-A report of the Revision Committee of Chinese Guidelines for Prevention and Treatment of Hypertension. J Geriatr Cardiol. 2019;16:182–241.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Emrich IE, Bohm M, Mahfoud F. The 2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: A German point of view. Eur Heart J. 2019;40:1830–1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS, Casey DE Jr, Collins KJ, Dennison Himmelfarb C, et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Hypertension (Dallas, Tex: 1979). 2018;71:e13–e115.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Halfon M, Wuerzner G, Marques-Vidal P, Taffe P, Vaucher J, Waeber B, et al. Use of oscillometric devices in atrial fibrillation: a comparison of three devices and invasive blood pressure measurement. Blood Press. 2018;27:48–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Stergiou GS, Kyriakoulis KG, Stambolliu E, Destounis A, Karpettas N, Kalogeropoulos P, et al. Blood pressure measurement in atrial fibrillation: review and meta-analysis of evidence on accuracy and clinical relevance. J hypertension. 2019;37:2430–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Narkiewicz K, Kjeldsen SE, Burnier M, Oparil S. Challenges in oscillometric blood pressure measurement in atrial fibrillation: looking for practical solutions. Blood Press. 2018;27:1–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Stergiou GS, Kollias A, Destounis A, Tzamouranis D. Automated blood pressure measurement in atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J hypertension. 2013;31:215–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Clark CE, McDonagh STJ, McManus RJ. Accuracy of automated blood pressure measurements in the presence of atrial fibrillation: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hum hypertension. 2019;33:352–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Olbers J, Gille A, Ljungman P, Rosenqvist M, Ostergren J, Witt N. High beat-to-beat blood pressure variability in atrial fibrillation compared to sinus rhythm. Blood Press. 2018;27:249–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang XX, Shuai W, Hong K, Xu J, Li JX, Li P, et al. How to evaluate BP measurements using the oscillometric method in atrial fibrillation: the value of pulse rate variation. Hypertension Res. 2016;39:588–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Feenstra RK, Allaart CP, Berkelmans GFN, Westerhof BE, Smulders YM. Accuracy of oscillometric blood pressure measurement in atrial fibrillation. Blood Press Monit. 2018;23:59–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Xiao Y, Jin Y. Guidelines for clinical practice in ICU. Changsha, Hunan: Central South University Press; 2017.

  18. Watson T, Lip GY. Blood pressure measurement in atrial fibrillation: goodbye mercury? J Hum hypertension. 2006;20:638–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Danian Z, Tinghuai W. Physiology. Beijing: People’s Medical Publishing House; 2013.

  20. Taylor J. 2013 ESH/ESC guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. Eur Heart J. 2013;34:2108–9.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Xie F, Xu J, Xia LL, Luo X, Jiang Z, Wu Y, et al. The impact of atrial fibrillation on accuracy of oscillometric blood pressure measurement: effect of ventricular rate. Hypertension Res: Off J Jpn Soc Hypertension. 2020;43:518–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Picone DS, Schultz MG, Otahal P, Aakhus S, Al-Jumaily AM, Black JA, et al. Accuracy of cuff-measured blood pressure: systematic reviews and meta-analyses. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70:572–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sharman JE, Marwick TH, Gilroy D, Otahal P, Abhayaratna WP, Stowasser M, et al. Randomized trial of guiding hypertension management using central aortic blood pressure compared with best-practice care: principal findings of the BP GUIDE study. Hypertension (Dallas, Tex: 1979). 2013;62:1138–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Park SH, Choi YK. Measurement reliability of automated oscillometric blood pressure monitor in the elderly with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Blood Press Monit. 2020;25:2–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Pagonas N, Schmidt S, Eysel J, Compton F, Hoffmann C, Seibert F, et al. Impact of atrial fibrillation on the accuracy of oscillometric blood pressure monitoring. Hypertension (Dallas, Tex: 1979). 2013;62:579–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Lakhal K, Ehrmann S, Martin M, Faiz S, Reminiac F, Cinotti R, et al. Blood pressure monitoring during arrhythmia: agreement between automated brachial cuff and intra-arterial measurements. Br J Anaesth. 2015;115:540–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kollias A, Kyriakoulis KG, Stambolliu E, Stergiou GS. Prognostic value of office blood pressure measurement in patients with atrial fibrillation on anticoagulation therapy: systematic review and meta-analysis. J hypertension. 2020;38:13–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Xiao L, Jinsong X. Stability of Modified Korotkoff Sound Method in Measuring Blood Pressure for Atrial Fibrillation Patients with Rapid Ventricular Rate. Chin Gen Pract. 2017;20:4275–7.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Xiao L, Jinsong X, Xiantao H, Jiawei X, Qingxia H, Shenghua X, et al. The study of re-modified Korotkoff sound method in atrial fibrillation patients’ blood pressure measurement. J Clin Cardiol. 2018;34:81–85.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Chu G, Zhang Z, Xu M, Huang D, Dai Q. Validation of a smartphone auscultatory blood pressure kit Accutension XYZ-110 in adults according to the ANSI/AAMI/ISO 81060-2: 2013 standard. Blood Press Monit. 2017;22:290–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kyriakoulis KG, Kollias A, Anagnostopoulos I, Gravvani A, Kalogeropoulos P, Destounis A, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of a novel cuffless self-blood pressure monitor for atrial fibrillation screening in the elderly. J Clin hypertension (Greenwich, Conn). 2019;21:1797–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ishizawa M, Noma T, Izumi T, Tani R, Inoue T, Nasu E, et al. Development of a novel algorithm to detect atrial fibrillation using an automated blood pressure monitor with an irregular heartbeat detector. Circ J. 2019;83:2428–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge manuscript-preparation input from Joel Swai (ORCID: 0000-0001-5363-3977).

Funding information

The study was supported by the Key Research and Development Program of Hunan Province (No. 2022SK2029) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China Projects (No. 81800271).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China

    Xiexiong Zhao, Jingle Li, Miao Huang, Nana You, Jiaying Li, Ruixuan Li, Shunsong Chen, Tao Liu, Jianwei Zeng, Xiaogang Li & Weihong Jiang

Authors
  1. Xiexiong Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jingle Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Miao Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Nana You
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jiaying Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ruixuan Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Shunsong Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Tao Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Jianwei Zeng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Xiaogang Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Weihong Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xiaogang Li or Weihong Jiang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, X., Li, J., Huang, M. et al. The effect of heart rate on blood pressure measurement in patients with atrial fibrillation: a cross-sectional study. Hypertens Res 45, 1183–1192 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41440-022-00897-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41440-022-00897-1

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links