Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Prevalence and prognosis of refractory hypertension diagnosed using ambulatory blood pressure measurements

Hypertension Research volume 45, pages 1353–1362 (2022)Cite this article

Abstract

The prognosis of refractory hypertension is largely unknown due to its low prevalence. This study aimed to investigate the prognosis of refractory hypertension and compare it with those of resistant and nonresistant hypertension. We retrospectively analyzed the data of 16,284 participants with hypertension who underwent ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring between 2012 and 2019 at a tertiary center. Uncontrolled BP was defined as a 24-h BP ≥ 130/80 mmHg as assessed by ambulatory BP monitoring. Resistant hypertension was defined as uncontrolled BP despite the use of three antihypertensive medications, including a diuretic or the use of ≥4 drugs regardless of BP control. Refractory hypertension was defined as uncontrolled BP despite the use of ≥5 antihypertensive medications. Among 16,284 patients with hypertension (mean age 59.2 ± 15.5 years, 52.7% men), 1501 (9.2%) and 150 (0.9%) patients had resistant and refractory hypertension, respectively. The prevalence of chronic kidney disease, end-stage renal disease, heart failure, previous stroke, left ventricular hypertrophy, and the riser/nondipper patterns of circadian BP rhythm progressively increased from patients with nonresistant hypertension to patients with resistant hypertension to patients with refractory hypertension. During a median follow-up of 3.9 years, the risk of cardiovascular mortality progressively increased from patients with nonresistant hypertension to patients with resistant hypertension (hazard ratio 1.62, 95% confidence interval 1.16–2.26) to patients with refractory hypertension (hazard ratio 5.22, 95% confidence interval 3.04–8.96). In conclusion, refractory hypertension, defined as uncontrolled ambulatory BP levels, was associated with a higher risk of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality than nonresistant or resistant hypertension.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rapsomaniki E, Timmis A, George J, Pujades-Rodriguez M, Shah AD, Denaxas S, et al. Blood pressure and incidence of twelve cardiovascular diseases: lifetime risks, healthy life-years lost, and age-specific associations in 1.25 million people. Lancet. 2014;383:1899–911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ettehad D, Emdin CA, Kiran A, Anderson SG, Callender T, Emberson J, et al. Blood pressure lowering for prevention of cardiovascular disease and death: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2016;387:957–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Carey RM, Calhoun DA, Bakris GL, Brook RD, Daugherty SL, Dennison-Himmelfarb CR. American Heart Association Professional/Public E, Publications Committee of the Council on H, Council on C, Stroke N, Council on Clinical C, Council on G, Precision M, Council on Peripheral Vascular D, Council on Quality of C, Outcomes R, Stroke et al. Resistant Hypertension: Detection, Evaluation, and Management: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Hypertension. 2018;72:e53–e90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Persell SD. Prevalence of resistant hypertension in the United States, 2003-2008. Hypertension. 2011;57:1076–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. de la Sierra A, Segura J, Banegas JR, Gorostidi M, de la Cruz JJ, Armario P, et al. Clinical features of 8295 patients with resistant hypertension classified on the basis of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Hypertension. 2011;57:898–902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Carey RM, Sakhuja S, Calhoun DA, Whelton PK, Muntner P. Prevalence of Apparent Treatment-Resistant Hypertension in the United States. Hypertension. 2019;73:424–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sim JJ, Bhandari SK, Shi J, Reynolds K, Calhoun DA, Kalantar-Zadeh K, et al. Comparative risk of renal, cardiovascular, and mortality outcomes in controlled, uncontrolled resistant, and nonresistant hypertension. Kidney Int. 2015;88:622–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Daugherty SL, Powers JD, Magid DJ, Tavel HM, Masoudi FA, Margolis KL, et al. Incidence and prognosis of resistant hypertension in hypertensive patients. Circulation. 2012;125:1635–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Buhnerkempe MG, Botchway A, Prakash V, Al-Akchar M, Nolasco Morales CE, Calhoun DA, et al. Prevalence of refractory hypertension in the United States from 1999 to 2014. J Hypertens. 2019;37:1797–804.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Acelajado MC, Hughes ZH, Oparil S, Calhoun DA. Treatment of resistant and refractory hypertension. Circ Res. 2019;124:1061–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Dudenbostel T, Siddiqui M, Oparil S, Calhoun DA. Refractory hypertension: a novel phenotype of antihypertensive treatment failure. Hypertension. 2016;67:1085–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Dudenbostel T, Acelajado MC, Pisoni R, Li P, Oparil S, Calhoun DA. Refractory hypertension: evidence of heightened sympathetic activity as a cause of antihypertensive treatment failure. Hypertension. 2015;66:126–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Armario P, Calhoun DA, Oliveras A, Blanch P, Vinyoles E, Banegas JR, et al. Prevalence and clinical characteristics of refractory hypertension. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017;6:e007365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Calhoun DA, Boothlll JN, Oparil S, Irvin MR, Shimbo D, Lackland DT, et al. Refractory hypertension: determination of prevalence, risk factors, and comorbidities in a large, population-based cohort. Hypertension. 2014;63:451–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee CJ, Ha JH, Kim JY, Kim IC, Ryu SK, Rhee MY, et al. Office blood pressure threshold of 130/80 mmHg better predicts uncontrolled out-of-office blood pressure in apparent treatment-resistant hypertension. J Clin Hypertens. 2021;23:595–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jhee JH, Seo J, Lee CJ, Park JT, Han SH, Kang SW, et al. Ambulatory blood pressure variability and risk of cardiovascular events, all-cause mortality, and progression of kidney disease. J Hypertens. 2020;38:1712–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. O’Brien E, Asmar R, Beilin L, Imai Y, Mallion JM, Mancia G.European Society of Hypertension Working Group on Blood Pressure M. et al. European Society of Hypertension recommendations for conventional, ambulatory and home blood pressure measurement. J Hypertens. 2003;21:821–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim HC, Ihm SH, Kim GH, Kim JH, Kim KI, Lee HY, et al. Korean Society of Hypertension guidelines for the management of hypertension: part I-epidemiology of hypertension. Clin Hypertens. 2019;25:16. 2018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. O’Brien E, Parati G, Stergiou G, Asmar R, Beilin L, Bilo G.European Society of Hypertension Working Group on Blood Pressure M. et al. European Society of Hypertension position paper on ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. J Hypertens. 2013;31:1731–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Parati G, Stergiou G, O’Brien E, Asmar R, Beilin L, Bilo G.European Society of Hypertension Working Group on Blood Pressure M, Cardiovascular V. et al. European Society of Hypertension practice guidelines for ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. J Hypertens. 2014;32:1359–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Levey AS, Stevens LA, Schmid CH, Zhang Y, Castro AF III, Feldman HI, et al. A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150:604–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, Afilalo J, Armstrong A, Ernande L, et al. Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. Eur Heart J-Cardiovascular Imaging. 2015;16:233–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Baek J, Lee H, Lee HH, Heo JE, Cho SMJ, Kim HC. Thirty-six Year Trends in Mortality from Diseases of Circulatory System in Korea. Korean Circ J. 2021;51:320–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lee E, Choi EK, Han KD, Lee H, Choe WS, Lee SR, et al. Mortality and causes of death in patients with atrial fibrillation: a nationwide population-based study. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0209687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lee CJ, Oh J, Lee SH, Kang SM, Choi D, Kim HC, et al. Efficacy of aspirin and statins in primary prevention of cardiovascular mortality in uncomplicated hypertensive participants: a Korean national cohort study. J Hypertens. 2017;35:S33–S40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Williams B, Mancia G, Spiering W, Agabiti Rosei E, Azizi M, Burnier M, et al. 2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: The Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Society of Hypertension (ESH). Eur Heart J. 2018;39:3021–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Cardoso CRL, Salles GF. Refractory Hypertension and Risks of Adverse Cardiovascular Events and Mortality in Patients With Resistant Hypertension: A Prospective Cohort Study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020;9:e017634.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Salles GF, Cardoso CR, Muxfeldt ES. Prognostic influence of office and ambulatory blood pressures in resistant hypertension. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168:2340–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Williams B, MacDonald TM, Morant S, Webb DJ, Sever P, McInnes G. British Hypertension Society’s PSG. et al. Spironolactone versus placebo, bisoprolol, and doxazosin to determine the optimal treatment for drug-resistant hypertension (PATHWAY-2): a randomised, double-blind, crossover trial. Lancet. 2015;386:2059–68.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by a Research Program (2021-ER0903-00) funded by the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Cardiology, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea

    Minjae Yoon, Jaewon Oh, Chan Joo Lee, Sang-Hak Lee, Seok-Min Kang & Sungha Park

  2. Department of Preventive Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea

    Seng Chan You

Authors
  1. Minjae Yoon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Seng Chan You
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jaewon Oh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Chan Joo Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Sang-Hak Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Seok-Min Kang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Sungha Park
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sungha Park.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yoon, M., You, S.C., Oh, J. et al. Prevalence and prognosis of refractory hypertension diagnosed using ambulatory blood pressure measurements. Hypertens Res 45, 1353–1362 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41440-021-00845-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41440-021-00845-5

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links