Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Future possibilities for artificial intelligence in the practical management of hypertension

Hypertension Research volume 43, pages 1327–1337 (2020)Cite this article

Abstract

The use of artificial intelligence in numerous prediction and classification tasks, including clinical research and healthcare management, is becoming increasingly more common. This review describes the current status and a future possibility for artificial intelligence in blood pressure management, that is, the possibility of accurately predicting and estimating blood pressure using large-scale data, such as personal health records and electronic medical records. Individual blood pressure continuously changes because of lifestyle habits and the environment. This review focuses on two topics regarding controlling changing blood pressure: a novel blood pressure measurement system and blood pressure analysis using artificial intelligence. Regarding the novel blood pressure measurement system, we compare the conventional cuff-less method with the analysis of pulse waves using artificial intelligence for blood pressure estimation. Then, we describe the prediction of future blood pressure values using machine learning and deep learning. In addition, we summarize factor analysis using “explainable AI” to solve a black-box problem of artificial intelligence. Overall, we show that artificial intelligence is advantageous for hypertension management and can be used to establish clinical evidence for the practical management of hypertension.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Get just this article for as long as you need it

$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Lecun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G. Deep learning. Nature. 2015;521:436–444.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Karras T, Laine S, Aila T. A style-based generator architecture for generative adversarial networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2019;4396–4405. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2019.00453.

  3. Devlin J, Chang M-W, Lee K, Toutanova K. BERT: pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. arXiv:1810.04805 [cs.CL]. 2018.

  4. McKinney SM, Sieniek M, Godbole V, Godwin J, Antropova N, Ashrafian H, et al. International evaluation of an AI system for breast cancer screening. Nature. 2020;577:89–94.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hannun AY, Rajpurkar P, Haghpanahi M, Tison GH, Bourn C, Turakhia MP, et al. Cardiologist-level arrhythmia detection and classification in ambulatory electrocardiograms using a deep neural network. Nat Med. 2019;25:65–69. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-018-0268-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Attia ZI, Noseworthy PA, Lopez-Jimenez F, Asirvatham SJ, Deshmukh AJ, Gersh BJ, et al. An artificial intelligence-enabled ECG algorithm for the identification of patients with atrial fibrillation during sinus rhythm: a retrospective analysis of outcome prediction. Lancet. 2019;394:861–867.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hinton G. Deep learning-a technology with the potential to transform health care. JAMA. 2018;320:1101–1102. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.11100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Shortliffe EH, Sepúlveda MJ. Clinical decision support in the era of artificial intelligence. JAMA. 2018;320:2199–2200.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Beam AL, Kohane IS. Big data and machine learning in health care. JAMA. 2018;319:1317–1318.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Park SH, Han K. Methodologic guide for evaluating clinical performance and effect of artificial intelligence technology for medical diagnosis and prediction. Radiology. 2018;286:800–809.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jiang F, Jiang Y, Zhi H, Dong Y, Li H, Ma S, et al. Artificial intelligence in healthcare: past, present and future. Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2017;2:230–243.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Santhanam P, Ahima RS. Machine learning and blood pressure. J Clin Hypertens. 2019;21:1735–1737.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fujiyoshi A, Ohkubo T, Miura K, Murakami Y, Nagasawa SY, Okamura T, et al. Blood pressure categories and long-term risk of cardiovascular disease according to age group in Japanese men and women. Hypertens Res. 2012;35:947–953.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Yusuf S, Thom T, Abbott RD. Changes in hypertension treatment and in congestive heart failure mortality in the united states. Hypertension. 1989;13:I-74–I–79.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Umemura S, Arima H, Arima S, Asayama K, Dohi Y, Hirooka Y, et al. The Japanese Society of hypertension guidelines for the management of hypertension (JSH 2019). Hypertens Res. 2019;42:1235–1481.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS, Casey DE, Collins KJ, Dennison Himmelfarb C, et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71:e127–e248.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Williams B, Mancia G, Spiering W, Agabiti Rosei E, Azizi M, Burnier M, et al. 2018 ESC/ESH guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. Eur Heart J. 2018;39:3021–3104.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kikuya M, Ohkubo T, Metoki H, Asayama K, Hara A, Obara T, et al. Day-by-day variability of blood pressure and heart rate at home as a novel predictor of prognosis. Hypertension. 2008;52:1045–1050.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hanazawa T, Asayama K, Watabe D, Tanabe A, Satoh M, Inoue R, et al. Association between amplitude of seasonal variation in self-measured home blood pressure and cardiovascular outcomes: HOMED-BP (Hypertension Objective Treatment Based on Measurement by Electrical Devices of Blood Pressure) study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.008509.

  20. Wang J, Shi X, Ma C, Zheng H, Xiao J, Bian H, et al. Visit-to-visit blood pressure variability is a risk factor for all-cause mortality and cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hypertens. 2017;35:10–17.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Appel LJ, Moore TJ, Obarzanek E, Vollmer WM, Svetkey LP, Sacks FM, et al. A clinical trial of the effects of dietary patterns on blood pressure. N. Engl J Med. 1997;336:1117–1124.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Whelton PK, Appel LJ, Espeland MA, Applegate WB, Ettinger WH, Kostis JB, et al. Sodium reduction and weight loss in the treatment of hypertension in older persons: a randomized controlled trial of nonpharmacologic interventions in the elderly (TONE). J Am Med Assoc. 1998;279:839–846.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Pescatello LS, Franklin BA, Fagard R, Farquhar WB, Kelley GA, Ray CA. Exercise and hypertension. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36:533–553. https://doi.org/10.1249/01.MSS.0000115224.88514.3A.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Barnett AG, Sans S, Salomaa V, Kuulasmaa K, Dobson AJ. The effect of temperature on systolic blood pressure. Blood Press Monit. 2007;12:195–203.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Nagele E, Jeitler K, Horvath K, Semlitsch T, Posch N, Herrmann KH, et al. Clinical effectiveness of stress-reduction techniques in patients with hypertension: systematic reviewand meta-analysis. J Hypertens. 2014;32:1936–1944.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Xu Y, Zhang W, Wang D, Ping P. A calibration method for cuffless continue blood pressure measurement using Gaussian normalized pulse transit time. In: I2MTC 2018—2018 IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference: Discovering New Horizons in Instrumentation and Measurement, Proceedings. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2018;1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/I2MTC.2018.8409817.

  27. Bhattacharya T, Gupta A, Singh ST, Roy S, Prasad A. Robust motion artefact resistant circuit for calculation of Mean Arterial Pressure from pulse transit time. In: Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBS. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2017, 3553–3556. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC.2017.8037624.

  28. Van Velzen MHN, Loeve AJ, Niehof SP, Mik EG. Increasing accuracy of pulse transit time measurements by automated elimination of distorted photoplethysmography waves. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2017;55:1989–2000.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Rosenberger ME, Buman MP, Haskell WL, McConnell MV, Carstensen LL. Twenty-four Hours of Sleep, Sedentary Behavior, and Physical Activity with Nine Wearable Devices. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016;48:457–465.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Moon EW, Tan NC, Allen JC, Jafar TH. The use of wireless, smartphone app–assisted home blood pressure monitoring among hypertensive patients in Singapore: pilot randomized controlled trial. JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2019;7:2366–2370.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Werbos PJ. Backpropagation through time: what it does and how to do it. Proc IEEE. 1990;78:1550–1560.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hochreiter S, Schmidhuber J. Long short-term memory. Neural Comput. 1997;9:1735–1780.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Wang Z, Yan W, Oates T. Time series classification from scratch with deep neural networks: A strong baseline. In: Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2017, 1578–1585. https://doi.org/10.1109/IJCNN.2017.7966039.

  34. Perez MV, Mahaffey KW, Hedlin H, Rumsfeld JS, Garcia A, Ferris T, et al. Large-scale assessment of a smartwatch to identify atrial fibrillation. N. Engl J Med. 2019;381:1909–1917.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Ólafsdóttir AF, Attvall S, Sandgren U, Dahlqvist S, Pivodic A, Skrtic S, et al. A clinical trial of the accuracy and treatment experience of the flash glucose monitor freestyle libre in adults with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2017;19:164–172.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Kario K. Evidence and perspectives on the 24-hour management of hypertension: hemodynamic biomarker-initiated ‘anticipation medicine’ for zero cardiovascular event. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2016;59:262–281.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kuwabara M, Harada K, Hishiki Y, Kario K. Validation of a wrist-type home nocturnal blood pressure monitor in the sitting and supine position according to the ANSI/AAMI/ISO81060-2:2013 guidelines: Omron HEM-9600T. J Clin Hypertens. 2019;21:463–469.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Kuwabara M, Harada K, Hishiki Y, Kario K. Validation of two watch-type wearable blood pressure monitors according to the ANSI/AAMI/ISO81060-2:2013 guidelines: Omron HEM-6410T-ZM and HEM-6410T-ZL. J Clin Hypertens. 2019;21:853–858.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation American National Standard. ANSI/AAMI/ISO 81060-2:2013 non-invasive sphygmomanometers—part 2: clinical investigation of automated measurement type. 2013. www.aami.org. Accessed 10 Mar 2020.

  40. Mukkamala R, Hahn JO, Inan OT, Mestha LK, Kim CS, Toreyin H, et al. Toward ubiquitous blood pressure monitoring via pulse transit time: theory and practice. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2015;62:1879–1901.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Sharma M, Barbosa K, Ho V, Griggs D, Ghirmai T, Krishnan S, et al. Cuff-less and continuous blood pressure monitoring: a methodological review. Technologies. 2017;5:21.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Monte-Moreno E. Non-invasive estimate of blood glucose and blood pressure from a photoplethysmograph by means of machine learning techniques. Artif Intell Med. 2011;53:127–138.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. O’Brien E, Waeber B, Parati G, Staessen J, Myers MG. Blood pressure measuring devices: Recommendations of the European Society of Hypertension. Br Med J. 2001;322:531–536.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Ruiz-Rodríguez JC, Ruiz-Sanmartín A, Ribas V, Caballero J, García-Roche A, Riera J, et al. Innovative continuous non-invasive cuffless blood pressure monitoring based on photoplethysmography technology. Intensive Care Med. 2013;39:1618–1625.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Sideris C, Kalantarian H, Nemati E, Sarrafzadeh M. Building Continuous Arterial Blood Pressure Prediction Models Using Recurrent Networks. In: 2016 IEEE International Conference on Smart Computing, SMARTCOMP 2016. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2016. https://doi.org/10.1109/SMARTCOMP.2016.7501681.

  46. Su P, Ding XR, Zhang YT, Liu J, Miao F, Zhao N. Long-term blood pressure prediction with deep recurrent neural networks. In: 2018 IEEE EMBS International Conference on Biomedical and Health Informatics, BHI 2018. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2018, 323–328. https://doi.org/10.1109/BHI.2018.8333434.

  47. Moody GB, Mark RG. A database to support development and evaluation of intelligent intensive care monitoring. In: Computers in Cardiology. IEEE, 1996, 657–660. https://doi.org/10.1109/cic.1996.542622.

  48. Shimazaki S, Bhuiyan S, Kawanaka H, Oguri K. Features Extraction for Cuffless Blood Pressure Estimation by Autoencoder from Photoplethysmography. In: Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBS. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2018, 2857–2860. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC.2018.8512829.

  49. Hinton GE, Salakhutdinov RR. Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks. Science. 2006;313:504–507.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Yan C, Li Z, Zhao W, Hu J, Jia D, Wang H, et al. Novel Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Cuff-less Blood Pressure Measurement Using ECG and PPG Signals. In: Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBS. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2019, 1917–1920. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC.2019.8857108p.

  51. Goldberger AL, Amaral LA, Glass L, Hausdorff JM, Ivanov PC, Mark RG, et al. PhysioBank, PhysioToolkit, and PhysioNet: components of a new research resource for complex physiologic signals. Circulation 2000;101. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.101.23.e215.

  52. Mohebbian MR, Dinh A, Wahid K, Alam MS. Blind, cuff-less, calibration-free and continuous blood pressure estimation using optimized inductive group method of data handling. Biomed Signal Process Control. 2020;57:101682.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Schmidhuber J. Deep learning in neural networks: an overview. Neural Netw 2015;61:85–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2014.09.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Kario K, Shimbo D, Tomitani N, Kanegae H, Schwartz JE, Williams B. The first study comparing a wearable watch-type blood pressure monitor with a conventional ambulatory blood pressure monitor on in-office and out-of-office settings. J Clin Hypertens. 2020;22:135–141.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Watanabe N, Bando YK, Kawachi T, Yamakita H, Futatsuyama K, Honda Y, et al. Development and validation of a novel cuff-less blood pressure monitoring device. JACC Basic Transl Sci. 2017;2:631–642.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Coravos A, Khozin S, Mandl KD. Developing and adopting safe and effective digital biomarkers to improve patient outcomes. npj Digit Med. 2019;2:1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Hirata T, Nakamura T, Kogure M, Tsuchiya N, Narita A, Miyagawa K, et al. Reduced sleep efficiency, measured using an objective device, was related to an increased prevalence of home hypertension in Japanese adults. Hypertens Res. 2020;43:23–29.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Iwahori T, Miura K, Ueshima H. Time to consider use of the sodium-to-potassium ratio for practical sodium reduction and potassium increase. Nutrients. 2017;9. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu9070700.

  59. Huang S, Xu Y, Yue L, Wei S, Liu L, Gan X, et al. Evaluating the risk of hypertension using an artificial neural network method in rural residents over the age of 35 years in a Chinese area. Hypertens Res. 2010;33:722–726.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Völzke H, Fung G, Ittermann T, Yu S, Baumeister SE, Dörr M, et al. A new, accurate predictive model for incident hypertension. J Hypertens. 2013;31:2142–2150.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Parikh NI, Pencina MJ, Wang TJ, Benjamin EJ, Lanier KJ, Levy D, et al. A risk score for predicting near-term incidence of hypertension: The Framingham Heart Study. Ann Intern Med. 2008;148:102–110.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Golino HF, de Amaral LSB, Duarte SFP, Gomes CMA, de Soares TJ, Dos Reis LA, et al. Predicting Increased Blood Pressure Using Machine Learning. J Obes. 2014;2014:1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Li X, Wu S, Wang L. Blood Pressure Prediction via Recurrent Models with Contextual Layer. In: Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web - WWW ’17. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press, 2017, 685–693. https://doi.org/10.1145/3038912.3052604.

  64. Kwong EWY, Wu H, Pang GK-H. A prediction model of blood pressure for telemedicine. Health Inform J. 2018;24:227–244.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Koshimizu H, Kojima R, Kario K, Okuno Y. Prediction of blood pressure variability using deep neural networks. Int J Med Inf. 2020;136:104067.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Ribeiro MT, Singh S, Guestrin C. ‘Why should i trust you?’ Explaining the predictions of any classifier. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. New York, New York, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2016, 1135–1144. https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939778.

  67. Sundararajan M, Taly A, Yan Q. Axiomatic attribution for deep networks. Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning. 2017;7:5109–5118.

  68. Lundberg SM, Lee SI. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 2017, 4766–4775. https://github.com/slundberg/shap. Accessed 14 Mar 2020.

  69. Chiang P-H, Dey S. Personalized Effect of Health Behavior on Blood Pressure: Machine Learning Based Prediction and Recommendation. In 2018 IEEE 20th International Conference on e-Health Networking, Applications and Services (Healthcom). IEEE, 2018, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/HealthCom.2018.8531109.

  70. Elshawi R, Al-Mallah MH, Sakr S. On the interpretability of machine learning-based model for predicting hypertension. BMC Med Inf Decis Mak. 2019;19:146.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Guthrie NL, Carpenter J, Edwards KL, Appelbaum KJ, Dey S, Eisenberg DM, et al. Emergence of digital biomarkers to predict and modify treatment efficacy: machine learning study. BMJ Open. 2019;9:e030710.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Lundberg SM, Nair B, Vavilala MS, Horibe M, Eisses MJ, Adams T, et al. Explainable machine-learning predictions for the prevention of hypoxaemia during surgery. Nat Biomed Eng. 2018;2:749–760.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Hiroshi Koshimizu would like to express my gratitude to Omron Healthcare Co., Ltd. for giving me the time to complete this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biomedical Data Intelligence, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan

    Hiroshi Koshimizu, Ryosuke Kojima & Yasushi Okuno

  2. Development Center, Omron Healthcare Co., Ltd., Kyoto, 617-0002, Japan

    Hiroshi Koshimizu

Authors
  1. Hiroshi Koshimizu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ryosuke Kojima
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yasushi Okuno
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yasushi Okuno.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Employment: HK (Omron Healthcare Co., Ltd.), None: RK, YO.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Koshimizu, H., Kojima, R. & Okuno, Y. Future possibilities for artificial intelligence in the practical management of hypertension. Hypertens Res 43, 1327–1337 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41440-020-0498-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41440-020-0498-x

Keywords

  • Artificial intelligence
  • Machine learning
  • Blood pressure management
  • Blood pressure measurement
  • Blood pressure prediction

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links