Introduction

Apple fruit quality and yield are affected by cultivars and various environmental factors. Among the environmental factors, phytohormones greatly influence plant development and productivity and play vital roles in the chlorophyll content, alterations to nutrients and moisture, the accumulation of harmful substances, and insect pests. As central integrators, plant hormones are involved in complex developmental and stress-adaptive signaling cascades throughout plant responses involving signaling of the phytohormone abscisic acid (ABA). ABA plays a vital role in the activation of plant cellular responses to stress and is a central regulator of growth inhibition1,2,3. ABA also influences plant growth and development. At the ripening stage of ‘Orin’ apples, ABA promotes the biosynthesis of aromatic esters related to ethylene4. Studies have also shown that ABA plays an important role in sugar accumulation in fleshy fruits5.

ABA is involved in plant growth via a highly complex network; ABA is mainly a signaling pathway component. In the past few decades, the mechanism of the ABA signaling has been clearly revealed. ABA receptors, which perceive the initial activity, sense the ABA signal and elicit downstream signaling cascades to evoke physiological responses. ABA receptors include plasma membrane and intracellular receptors6,7,8. An unconventional G protein-coupled receptor (GCR2) and a novel class of G protein-coupled receptors (GTG1 and GTG2), which are plasma membrane ABA receptors, have been identified9,10,11. PYR/PYL/RCAR proteins, which are considered cytosolic ABA receptors, mediate downstream gene expression of the ABA signaling pathway by directly inhibiting type 2C protein phosphatases12,13,14. Because of the complex network of ABA signaling, the functions of additional proteins in the ABA signaling pathway remain unclear.

As one of the largest transcription factor families, the WRKY family of proteins is associated with many stress response defense pathways because of the highly conserved WRKY domain of these proteins that binds the W-box (T)(T)TGAC(C/T)15,16. WRKY transcription factors are involved in the ABA signaling pathway. AtWRKY40 is related to the ABA signal by negatively regulating the expression of ABI4 and ABI5, which encode APETALA2 domain-containing and basic leucine zipper (bZIP)-type transcription factors, respectively17,18. During seed germination and early seedling development, abi4 and abi5 mutants exhibit ABA-insensitive phenotypes17. AtWRKY18 and AtWRKY60, which belong to the same group as AtWRKY40, play negative roles in ABA signaling19. During seed germination and vegetative growth, AtWRKY63 and wrky2 mutants exhibit similar hypersensitive symptoms in response to exogenous ABA20,21. In seed dormancy, AtWRKY41 participates in ABA signaling by regulating the direct expression of ABI322. However, AtWRKY8 protects plants against TMV-cg by affecting ethylene and ABA signaling23.

Recently, AtWRKY6 was found to be a positive regulator of ABA signaling by directly regulating RAV1 expression during seed germination and early seedling development24. In Arabidopsis, AtWRKY6 is induced significantly by ABA24, which clusters into the same group as does AtWRKY3115. AtRAV1 overexpression slows rosette leaf and lateral root development, whereas suppressing AtRAV1 expression results in an early-flowering phenotype25. AtRAV1 negatively regulates plant development and positively regulates leaf senescence by causing a premature phenotype26. AtRAV1 thus plays a vital role in ABA signaling by repressing the expression of ABI3, ABI4, and ABI527.

Many WRKYs play crucial roles in response to ABA28; therefore, it is worthwhile to elucidate the functions and regulatory mechanisms of MdWRKYs in the ABA signaling pathway in apple. In this study, we found MdWRKY31 to be a positive regulator of ABA signaling. Ectopic expression of MdWRKY31 in Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana exhibited ABA-hypersensitive phenotypes during seed germination and early seedling development. When MdWRKY31 was overexpressed in apple seedlings and calli, the transgenic lines showed hypersensitive symptoms similar to those in response to ABA by elevating ABA-responsive genes. Correspondingly, repressing the expression of MdWRKY31 reduced sensitivity to ABA. By binding directly to its promoter, MdWRKY31 was able to repress the expression of MdRAV1. In addition, MdRAV1 could bind to the promoters of MdABI3 and MdABI4 to inhibit their expression directly. Our findings reveal the function and a novel molecular mechanism of MdWRKY31 in mediating the ABA signaling pathway in apple.

Results

Expression analysis of MdWRKY31

ABA is an important phytohormone that plays a crucial role in plant growth and development. To identify potential genes associated with ABA, we performed an RNA-seq analysis to examine the differentially expressed genes in ‘Royal Gala’ seedlings treated with 100 μM ABA or in seedlings under normal conditions. The data revealed that many genes were either upregulated or downregulated (Table S2). Among them, an apple WRKY transcription factor (MD05G1349800) was identified to be apparently induced by ABA treatment; this transcription factors was labeled MdWRKY31. To further verify the RNA-seq results, the expression of MdWRKY31 in ‘Royal Gala’ seedlings treated with 100 μM ABA for 0, 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 h was measured. The results indicated that the transcription of MdWRKY31 was induced by ABA, peaking after 3 h of treatment and then declining gradually (Fig. 1a). We also examined the transcript level of MdWRKY31 under abiotic stress, including polyethylene glycol (PEG), low temperature, and salt (NaCl) stress, and found that PEG4000 treatment also induced the expression of MdWRKY31 (Fig. 1b). However, MdWRKY31 expression was strongly suppressed by low temperature and salt treatment (Fig. 1c, d). These results suggest that MdWRKY31 responded to various stresses and might function during these processes.

Fig. 1: Expression pattern of MdWRKY31 in response to abiotic stresses.
figure 1

ad MdWRKY31 transcript levels in tissue cultures of ‘Royal Gala’ treated with 100 μM ABA, PEG4000, 4 °C, and 100 mM NaCl, respectively. H2O (a, b, d) treatment and 28 °C (c) were used as controls; MdACTIN was an internal reference. The data were replicated three times, and the bars indicate SEs. Mean differences are significant at the P0.05 level between the bars with different letters and not significant at the P0.05 level with the same letters. The same setup applies to the following figure

Isolation and analysis of MdWRKY31

To verify the function of MdWRKY31, RNA was extracted from tissue-cultured ‘Royal Gala’ seedlings. A cDNA template was obtained from RNA reverse transcription. The full-length sequence of 1821 bp of MdWRKY31 was amplified with upstream and downstream primers of MdWRKY31 (MdWRKY31F/R). MdWRKY31 encodes a protein of 607 amino acid residues with a complete ORF and an isoelectric point of 7.19. Sequence analysis between MdWRKY31 and 71 WRKYs in Arabidopsis showed that MdWRKY31 clustered in a group together with AtWRKY42, AtWRKY47, AtWRKY31, and AtWRKY6 (Fig. 2a). Multiple sequence alignment of WRKY31 from Arabidopsis, Pyrus bretschneideri, and Malus domestica indicated that the MdWRKY31 protein contained a conserved WRKY domain in its C-terminal region (Fig. 2b). An evolutionary tree was subsequently constructed to analyze MdWRKY31 and other WRKYs from different plant species, including Malus hupehensis, Pyrus bretschneideri, Prunus avium, Prunus mume, Prunus persica, Fragaria vesca subsp. Vesca, Ziziphus jujube, Morus notabilis, and Juglans regia. Two apple WRKY TFs from Malus domestica and Malus hupehensis demonstrated more than 99% sequence similarity. The apple MdWRKY31 protein exhibited the closest relationship to the pear WRKY31 protein and the farthest relationship with the walnut WRKY31 protein (Fig. 2c).

Fig. 2: Sequence analysis of the MdWRKY31 protein.
figure 2

a Multiple sequence alignment of MdWRKY31 and WRKYs from Arabidopsis. b Alignment of three WRKY proteins. WRKY domains are indicated by dotted lines. At: Arabidopsis thaliana, Md Malus domestica, Pb Pyrus bretschneideri. c Multiple sequence alignment of MdWRKY31 and WRKYs from other plant species

MdWRKY31 localizes to the nucleus

Protein function is closely related to cellular location. To examine the cellular localization of the MdWRKY31 protein, a MdWRKY31-mCherry fusion protein whose C-terminal expressed an enhanced red fluorescent protein (ERFP) was constructed. A plasmid containing RFP alone was used as a control. After transient injection into Nicotiana benthamiana, red fluorescence of MdWRKY31-mCherry was observed in the nucleus, whereas the fluorescence of the control RFP was uniformly distributed across a greater field of vision; thus, MdWRKY31 was localized to the nucleus (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3: Subcellular localization of the MdWRKY31 protein.
figure 3

Laser-scanning confocal microscopy images of Nicotiana benthamiana leaves expressing MdWRKY31-RFP. The micrographs show MdWRKY31-RFP localized to the nucleus. An empty RFP was used as a control. DAPI is a nuclear dye. The scale bar represents 20 μM

Ectopic expression of MdWRKY31 in Arabidopsis and tobacco increases sensitivity to ABA

To determine the function of MdWRKY31, transgenic Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana plants overexpressing MdWRKY31 were obtained (Fig. 4a; Fig. S1). Seven transgenic Arabidopsis plants and five transgenic tobacco plants overexpressing MdWRKY31 presented different MdWRKY31 expression levels. Three transgenic lines (OE-1, OE-2, and OE-3 in Arabidopsis; 35::MdWRKY31-1, 35::MdWRKY31-2 and 35::MdWRKY31-3, respectively) with different MdWRKY31 gene expression levels (low, moderate, and high, respectively) were selected to perform subsequent phenotypic experiments involving ABA responses. Both the Arabidopsis and tobacco transgenic lines had a lower seed germination rate than did the wild type in response to ABA (Figs. 4b–e and 5a, b). With higher ABA concentrations, seeds of Arabidopsis and tobacco germinated relatively later. Root growth in response to ABA was subsequently examined in WT and MdWRKY31-overexpressing Arabidopsis and tobacco. We found the primary root length to be much shorter in the transgenic lines compared to the wild-type lines in both Arabidopsis and tobacco (Figs. 4f, g and 5c, d). These findings suggested that MdWRKY31 increased sensitivity to ABA in Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana.

Fig. 4: Sensitivity to ABA after MdWRKY31 ectopic expression in Arabidopsis.
figure 4

a Determination of the MdWRKY31 protein in transgenic Arabidopsis. WT represents wild-type Arabidopsis (Columbia), and OE represents MdWRKY31-overexpressing Arabidopsis. The numbers 1–7 represent different transgenic lines. b Phenotypes of different types of Arabidopsis treated with or without ABA in 1/2-strength MS medium. ce Seed germination rates in different types of Arabidopsis growing in 1/2-strength MS medium with or without ABA. f Phenotypes of different types of Arabidopsis growing in 1/2-strength MS medium with or without 10 μM ABA. g Length of primary roots treated with or without 10 μM ABA

Fig. 5: MdWRKY31 overexpression conferred increased ABA sensitivity to Nicotiana benthamiana.
figure 5

a Phenotypes of different types of Nicotiana benthamiana treated with or without ABA in 1/2-strength MS medium. WT represents wild-type tobacco (Ben). 35::MdWRKY31 represents an MdWRKY31-overexpressing tobacco. The numbers 1–3 represent different transgenic lines. b Seed germination rates in different types of Nicotiana benthamiana growing in 1/2-strength MS medium with or without ABA. c Phenotypes of different types of Nicotiana benthamiana growing in 1/2-strength MS medium with or without 10 μM ABA. d Length of primary roots treated with or without 10 μM ABA

MdWRKY31 positively regulates ABA sensitivity in apple

ABA perception and signaling are major factors limiting apple production. To test whether MdWRKY31 was involved in the response to ABA in apple, MdWRKY31 was first fused to the expression vector PRI-GFP along with the strong 35S promoter upstream. The 35S::MdWRKY31-GFP construct was then transformed into the roots of ‘Royal Gala’ seedlings using the Agrobacterium rhizogenes-mediated transformation method. Second, the specific fragment of MdWRKY31 fused into the expression vector pK7GWIWG2 along with an ERFP in its C-terminal region, after which the vector was transformed into the roots of ‘Royal Gala’ seedlings via the same transformation method. We then examined the fluorescence intensity and expression pattern of MdWRKY31. The results showed that the expression of MdWRKY31 was upregulated in MdWRKY31-overexpressing apple roots (Fig. 6a, b) but noticeably downregulated in MdWRKY31 RNAi-transformed roots (Fig. 6c, d). The wild type and three transgenic lines with different MdWRKY31 expression levels were subsequently treated with 100 μM ABA for 10 days. We evaluated the phenotypes of the WT and MdWRKY31 overexpressing/RNAi lines and found that the MdWRKY31 OE seedlings exhibited more sensitivity to ABA than did the wild type; by contrast, downregulating MdWRKY31 expression reduced plant ABA sensitivity (Figs. 7a and 8a). Tetranitroblue tetrazolium chloride (NBT) staining indicated that MdWRKY31 overexpression produced higher superoxide ion (O2−) than did the WT, and MdWRKY31 RNAi lines accumulated less O2− than did the WT (Figs. 7b and 8b). In addition, three MdWRKY31-overexpressing lines contained more MDA, lower RWC, and less chlorophyll than did the WT controls (Fig. 7c–e). These related physiological indicators of the ABA response were also detected in the leaves of MdWRKY31 RNAi lines; the MdWRKY31 RNAi seedlings accumulated less MDA and more chlorophyll and had a higher RWC than did the WT (Fig. 8c–e). MdWRKY31 transgenic apple roots exhibited great differences in ABA resistance; therefore, four ABA-responsive genes (MdAD29A, MdRAB18, MdEM1, and MdEM6) were measured. The results suggest that the expression of three of those genes (MdRAB18, MdEM1, and MdEM6) had varying degrees of increase in the MdWRKY31-overexpressing lines compared to the WT controls (Fig. 7f). Interestingly, compared to the WT controls, MdWRKY31-repressing lines (RNAi-6 and RNAi-9) also exhibited slightly higher expression of the abovementioned genes (MdRAB18, MdEM1, and MdEM6) (Fig. 8f). These results indicate that MdWRKY31 regulates ABA sensitivity in apple roots.

Fig. 6: MdWRKY31 overexpression and repression in apple roots.
figure 6

a Relative fluorescence intensity of green fluorescent protein (GFP) in the roots. WT represents an empty vector containing a GFP tag; OE represents MdWRKY31-overexpressing transgenic apple roots. The numbers 1–9 represent different strains. b qRT-PCR determination of MdWRKY31-overexpressing roots. c Relative fluorescence intensity of red fluorescent protein (RFP) in the roots. WT represents an empty vector containing an RFP tag; RNAi represents MdWRKY31 repressing roots. The numbers 1–9 represent different strains. d qRT-PCR determination of MdWRKY31-suppressing roots

Fig. 7: ABA sensitivity of MdWRKY31-overexpressing apple roots.
figure 7

a Phenotypes of plants transformed with an empty vector that contains a GFP tag (WT) and of six overexpression lines (OE-1, 4, and 7 without ABA treatment and OE-2, 5, and 8 with ABA treatment). b NBT staining dye in the leaves of transgenic lines with or without ABA treatment. ce MDA content, relative water content, and chlorophyll content of transgenic lines with or without ABA treatment. f Expression of four ABA-responsive genes, MdRD29A, MdRAB18, MdEM1, and MdEM6, in transgenic lines with or without ABA treatment

Fig. 8: ABA sensitivity of MdWRKY31-repressing apple roots.
figure 8

a Phenotypes of plants transformed with an empty vector that contains an RFP tag (WT) and six overexpression lines (RNAi-1, 5, and 8 without ABA treatment and RNAi-2, 6, and 9 with ABA treatment). b NBT staining dye in the leaves of transgenic lines with or without ABA treatment. ce MDA content, relative water content, and chlorophyll content of transgenic lines with or without ABA treatment. f Expression of four ABA-responsive genes, MdRD29A, MdRAB18, MdEM1, and MdEM6, in transgenic lines with or without ABA treatment

To confirm the function of MdWRKY31 in apple, we transformed 35S::MdWRKY31 to apple calli and generated six MdWRKY31 transgenic lines that present different MdWRKY31 expression levels (Fig. S2a). MdWRKY31 protein levels in the six transgenic lines were examined using an anti-GFP antibody. We found detectable MdWRKY31 proteins in all six transgenic calli (Fig. S2b). Next, three independent lines (OE-1, OE-2, and OE-3) were selected for subsequent experiments. Apple calli were treated with 50, 100, and 150 μM ABA. Evaluation of the phenotypes and fresh weight revealed that ABA at different concentrations inhibited apple callus growth and that the degree of inhibition was more obvious in the transgenic calli than in the WT calli (Fig. S2c, d). These results further confirm that MdWRKY31 acts as a positive regulator in the ABA signaling pathway in apple.

MdWRKY31 represses the transcription of MdRAV1 by binding directly to its promoter in apple

To explore the mechanism of MdWRKY31-regulated ABA resistance, related genes associated with ABA signaling were monitored in WT and MdWRKY31-overexpressing apple roots (Fig. S3). Many genes were upregulated and downregulated to varying degrees in MdWRKY31 OE roots compared to WT roots. Interestingly, the expression of two MdRAV genes, MdRAV1 (MD16G1047700) and MdRAV2 (MD13G1046100), was clearly suppressed in the MdWRKY31 OE roots. The promoters of the MdRAV1 and MdRAV2 genes were analyzed, and one W-box motif, a WRKY binding motif, was identified in both promoter sequences (Table S3). Therefore, we deduced that MdWRKY31 binds to the promoters of MdRAVs. First, an electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA) was conducted to detect the binding of MdWRKY31 to the promoter regions of MdRAV1 or MdRAV2. The results indicated that MdWRKY31 binds directly to the promoter of MdRAV1 but not to the promoter of MdRAV2 (Fig. S4a) in vitro (Fig. 9a). When the TTGACC cis-element was replaced with the TACGTC element, the binding stopped (Fig. 9a), indicating specific binding. Yeast one-hybrid and chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) experiments then confirmed the interaction between MdWRKY31 and the MdRAV1 promoter (Fig. 9b–d).

Fig. 9: Direct repression of MdWRKY31 on the MdRAV1 promoter.
figure 9

a EMSA of MdWRKY31 binding to the MdRAV1 (MD16G1047700) promoter in vitro. Each biotin-labeled DNA probe was incubated with MdWRKY31-His protein. Mutation probes of P had the mutated W-box (TTGACA was replaced with TACGTC). b Interaction of MdWRKY31 with the promoter fragment of MdRAV1 in a yeast one-hybrid assay. The constructs were cotransformed into yeast Y187. The yeast was cultured on a culture medium devoid of tryptophan and histidine (SD/-T/-H) and then screened for lack of tryptophan, leucine, and histidine (SD/-T/-L/-H) with 20 and 80 mM 3-amino-1,2,4-triazole (3-AT). c Immunoblot analysis of the MdWRKY31-GFP protein. Wild-type and MdWRKY31-overexpressing transgenic calli with a GFP fusion tag were harvested and evaluated for immunoblot analysis using an anti-GFP antibody. The loading control was anti-ACTIN. d ChIP-qPCR assay of MdWRKY31 binding to the MdRAV1 promoter in vivo. ChIP-PCR revealed enriched DNA fragments of MdWRKY31-overexpressing calli (MdWRKY31-GFP) and calli transformed with an empty vector (GFP). The 18S served as the loading control. e GUS activity in transgenic calli as indicated. Quantitative statistics of GUS activity and GUS staining in pMdRAV1-GUS transgenic apple calli treated with or without MdWRKY31 and transiently transformed

These results demonstrate that MdWRKY31 binds to the promoter of MdRAV1. To further examine whether the transcriptional activity of MdRAV1 was induced or suppressed by MdWRKY31, a GUS reporter gene was fused downstream from the MdRAV1 promoter and labeled pMdRAV1::GUS. Additionally, we transformed pMdRAV1::GUS into apple calli and obtained pMdRAV1::GUS-overexpressing apple calli. MdWRKY31 was then transiently transformed into pMdRAV1:GUS and p1300-GN::GUS transgenic calli. We compared the GUS activity of the two transgenic calli and found that, compared with the GUS-overexpressing calli, the transgenic calli containing MdWRKY31 and pMdRAV1-GUS repressed the transcriptional activity of GUS (Fig. 9e). In general, the repression of MdRAV1 transcription in the MdWRKY31 transgenic calli and GUS staining results demonstrated that MdWRKY31 noticeably suppressed MdRAV1 expression (Fig. S3; Fig. 9e). Based on these findings, MdWRKY31 binds directly to the promoter regions of MdRAV1 to repress its expression.

MdRAV1 directly binds to promoters of MdABIs to repress their expression

As a transcription factor, AtRAV1 can bind to the promoters of AtABI3, AtABI4, and AtABI527. On the basis of the expression levels of MdABIs, the expression of MdABI3, MdABI4, and MdABI5 obviously increased in the MdWRKY31 OE lines compared to the WT (Fig. S3). We analyzed the promoter regions of the three MdABI genes and found several conserved cis-acting elements (CAACA) in promoters of all three MdABI genes (Fig. S5). An EMSA assay was then carried out to detect interactions between MdRAV1 and the promoters of the MdABI genes. The results indicate that MdRAV1 could bind to CAACA at the P1 location of the promoters of MdABI3 and MdABI4 (Fig. 10a, b) but not MdABI5 in vitro (Fig. S4b). CAACA was subsequently mutated to TGGGG; binding was not detected (Fig. 10a, b), indicating specific binding. Yeast one-hybrid and ChIP assays then demonstrated the interaction between MdRAV1 and the MdABI3 and MdABI4 promoters (Fig. 10c).

Fig. 10: Direct repression of MdRAV1 on MdABI promoters.
figure 10

a EMSA of MdRAV1 binding to the MdABI3 (MD10G1169900) promoter in vitro. Each biotin-labeled DNA probe was incubated with MdRAV1-His protein. Mutation probes of P1 had a mutated W-box (CAACA was replaced with TGGGG). b EMSA of MdRAV1 binding to the MdABI4 (MD07G1224400) promoter in vitro. Each biotin-labeled DNA probe was incubated with MdRAV1-His protein. Mutation probes of P1 had a mutated element (CAACA was replaced with TGGGG). c Interaction of MdRAV1 with the promoter fragment of MdABI3 and MdABI4 in the yeast one-hybrid assay. The constructs were cotransformed into yeast Y187. The yeast was cultured on a culture medium devoid of tryptophan and histidine (SD/-T/-H) and then screened for lack of tryptophan, leucine, and histidine (SD/-T/-L/-H) with 20 and 80 mM of 3-amino-1,2,4-triazole (3-AT). d, e GUS activity in transgenic calli as indicated

To verify the suppression or activation of MdRAV1 on MdABI3 and MdABI4, the MdABI3 and MdABI4 promoters were fused to the GUS reporter gene downstream. We transformed pMdABI3::GUS and pMdABI4::GUS into apple calli and obtained pMdABI3::GUS and pMdABI4::GUS transgenic calli. MdRAV1 was then transiently transformed into the pMdABI3::GUS and pMdABI4::GUS transgenic calli. GUS activities in different types of apple calli were detected, and the results show that MdRAV1 repressed the transcription activity of pMdABI3::GUS and pMdABI4::GUS (Fig. 10d). Therefore, MdRAV1 bound directly to the promoter regions of MdABI3 and MdABI4 to repress their expression.

Discussion

MdWRKY31 can be induced by ABA

ABA is one of the most common factors affecting apple quality and yield. In ABA signaling, the rapid accumulation of ABA in response to drought protects plants against damage29. Many studies have shown that WRKYs play vital roles in ABA signaling and drought4,24,30. Transcriptome analysis has been indicated to be an effective method in biological research in recent years31,32,33. We used RNA-seq analysis to identify possible MdWRKYs that function in the ABA signaling pathway. Fortunately, one apple WRKY TF, MdWRKY31, was screened and found to be induced by ABA (Table S2). Further quantitative analysis revealed that ABA and PEG4000 (for simulating drought) significantly induced the expression of MdWRKY31, suggesting that MdWRKY31 may be related to ABA signaling and drought. We also found that treatment with NaCl and 4 °C repressed MdWRKY31 expression, implying that MdWRKY31 is involved in various abiotic stresses.

WRKY31 is conserved in different plant species

WRKY proteins are often classified into groups according to the number of WRKY domains and the features of their zinc-finger-like motif15. MdWRKY31 belongs to Group II and is homologous to AtWRKY42, AtWRKY47, AtWRKY31, and AtWRKY6 in Arabidopsis. In soybean, GmWRKY31 is involved in SA-mediated immune responses by binding the cis-acting W-box element of the GmSAGT1 gene34. In rice, WRKY55/WRKY31 positively regulates resistance to Magnaporthe oryzae35. The WRKY domain and phylogenetic tree analysis of WRKY31s implied that the function of WRKY31 could be conserved among different plant species.

MdWRKY31 localizes to the cell nucleus

Most transcription factors are located in the nucleus to perform their functions. OsWRKY67 positively regulates resistance against blast and bacterial blight and is ubiquitously expressed and sublocalized in the nucleus36. In grapevine, VaWRKY14 (involved in drought resistance) is localized to the nucleus37. A cucumber WRKY transcription factor, CsWRKY46, found exclusively in the nucleus, increases resistance to cold38. The location of MdWRKY31 indicates that it also is present in the cell nucleus, suggesting that MdWRKY31 potentially performs its function there.

MdWRKY31 positively regulates ABA signaling

Many reports have found that WRKYs are involved in ABA signaling. In Arabidopsis, WRKY41 controls seed dormancy by directly regulating ABI3 expression; WRKY40 directly represses the expression of the ABI5 ABA-responsive gene19,22. WRKY6 positively regulates ABA signaling by directly inhibiting the expression of RAV124. FvWRKY42 increases ABA sensitivity and improves osmotic stress resistance in strawberry30. In cotton, GhWRKY6-like improves salt tolerance by activating the ABA signaling pathway39. We found that ectopic expression of MdWRKY31 in Arabidopsis and tobacco and its homologous expression in apple calli and roots can increase sensitivity to ABA; thus, MdWRKY31 may positively mediate ABA signaling in plants.

It is difficult to obtain transgenic apple lines with stable expression because of the immaturity of the apple transformation system and its characteristics as a perennial woody plant. However, Agrobacterium rhizogenes-mediated transformation into apple roots renders gene function identification possible40. In this study, the function of MdWRKY31 was confirmed in apple roots. Phenotypes of apple roots overexpressing and repressing MdWRKY31 indicated that MdWRKY31 functions as a positive regulator in the ABA signaling pathway. The ABA-responsive genes RAB18 and RD29B in Arabidopsis have always been used as indicators of the ABA signaling pathway41,42. EM1, EM6, and RAB18 are three representative ABA-responsive genes. Analysis of the changes in the expression of these genes in transgenic MdWRKY31 overexpression or suppression apple roots indicated that relevant research from Arabidopsis is applicable to other species, such as apple. The phenotypes of different MdWRKY31 transgenic materials (Arabidopsis, tobacco, apple calli, and apple roots) suggested that the function of MdWRKY31 in the ABA signaling pathway is conserved beyond plant species.

O2−, a form of ROS (reactive oxygen), is a toxic molecule that can cause oxidative damage to proteins, DNA, and lipids43. ABA induces the production of ROS44. In this study, MdWRKY31 overexpression in transgenic apple plants promoted the accumulation of O2− in response to ABA. The release of reactive oxygen species can cause chlorophyll degradation, programmed cell death, and MDA accumulation45,46. MdWRKY31 overexpression in transgenic plants subsequently produced a higher MDA content and less chlorophyll and RWC in those plants than in the WT controls in response to ABA treatment.

MdWRKY31 can bind to the promoters of MdRAV1, which interact with the promoters of MdABI3 and MdABI4

Many protein kinases and transcription factors are involved in ABA signaling. ABI3, ABI4, and ABI5 mediate seed dormancy and seedling development47,48,49,50,51,52,53, and ABF2, ABF3, and ABF4 promote chlorophyll degradation and leaf senescence through ABA signaling54. SnRK2 kinases (SRK2D/SnRK2.2, SRK2E/SnRK2.6 and SRK2I/SnRK2.3 in Arabidopsis) play vital positive roles in ABA signaling downstream of the pyrabactin resistance1/PYR1-like/regulatory components of ABA receptor (PYR/PYL/RCAR) proteins12,13,55,56. The Arabidopsis RAV1 transcription factor provides plant insensitivity to ABA27. MdWRKY31 overexpression alters the expression of these genes involved in ABA signaling. The repression of MdRAV1 and increased expression of ABFs, ABIs, and SnRKs indicated that MdWRKY31 may be a positive regulator in ABA signaling. Studies have shown that AtWRKY42, which clustered in a group together with MdWRKY31, often functions as a transcriptional repressor57. Therefore, we proposed that MdWRKY31 also acted as a repressor of downstream genes; the MdRAV genes, whose expression was downregulated in the MdWRKY31-overexpressing plants, were selected for further investigation of their interaction. Direct binding of MdWRKY31 to the promoter regions of MdRAV1 and the binding of MdRAV1 to the promoters of MdABI3 and MdABI4 subsequently revealed that MdWRKY31 participated in ABA signaling by interacting directly with ABA-related genes to repress their transcription.

Conclusions

In conclusion, we identified the WRKY TF MdWRKY31 in apple, which was significantly induced by ABA. Compared with control plants, MdWRKY31 transgenic plant materials, including Arabidopsis, tobacco, and apple, exhibited greater ABA sensitivity, indicating that MdWRKY31 is a positive regulator in the ABA signaling pathway. Furthermore, we found that MdWRKY31 repressed the transcription of the MdRAV1 gene by binding directly to promoter region of MdRAV1. The results further revealed that MdRAV1 bound to the promoters of MdABI3 and MdABI4 and inhibited their expression. Our findings identified the function of MdWRKY31 in plants and the regulatory mechanism of MdWRKY31 to ABA sensitivity, which is useful in comprehending the complex TF-regulated network, and provide a potential gene for apple cultivar improvement. Rootstock improvement is also practical for apple, which is a grafted crop species. Apple root transformation may be a possible way to alter rootstock characteristics.

Materials and methods

Plant materials and experimental treatments

The ‘Orin’ callus cultivar was cultured on MS medium containing 0.5 mg/L 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) and 1.5 mg/L 6-benzylaminopurine (6-BA) at 26 °C in the dark. Tissue cultures of the ‘Royal Gala’ cultivar in vitro were grown on MS medium supplemented with 1.5 mg/L 6-BA and 0.2 mg/L IAA at 26 °C under a 16-h light/8-h dark photoperiod. The roots of ‘Royal Gala’ tissue-cultured seedlings were treated with water (control), 100 μmol/L ABA, 4 °C temperature (low temperature), 100 μmol/L NaCl, or PEG4000 for 0, 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 h. The samples were then quickly frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored in a refrigerator at −80 °C.

Nicotiana benthamiana (Ben), wild-type Arabidopsis (COL), and transgenic Nicotiana benthamiana and Arabidopsis were screened by MS media with 60 mg/L kanamycin. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) detected positive transgenic plants. After continuous screening for three generations, T3 homozygous plants were obtained and used for phenotypic experiments. Arabidopsis seeds were sown on MS medium with or without ABA for the germination experiments. Images were taken after 8 days of growth, after which the germination rate was analyzed. Four days after being sown, seedlings without ABA treatment were transferred to 1/2-strength MS media or 1/2-strength MS media with 10 μM ABA. These culture dishes were placed in a growth chamber at 25 °C under a 16-h photoperiod. The root length of the seedlings was evaluated after 7 days, and the average value of 40 plants was counted. Transgenic apple lines were transferred to a nutrient-rich potting medium that mixed with vermiculite (1:1) and treated with 100 μM ABA or no ABA for 10 days. Plant leaves were then used to analyze ABA-related indices, including the NBT dyeing, MDA content, relative water content, chlorophyll content, and relevant ABA-responsive genes.

Subcellular localization analysis

To explore the subcellular localization of MdWRKY31, the open reading frame (ORF) of MdWRKY31 was amplified from ‘Royal Gala’ apple tissue culture seedlings using PCR in conjunction with MdWRKY31-F and MdWRKY31-R as primers (Table S1). Based on MdWRKY31 sequences, the Gateway system was used to insert the MdWRKY31 ORF into the pENTRTM Directional TOPO vector with MdWRKY31-TOPO upstream and downstream primers. The recombination reaction (LR) was used to insert the MdWRKY31 gene into the PAL1107 vector to construct a MdWRKY31-RFP vector for subcellular localization.

Bacterial solutions of MdWRKY31-RFP and P19 were cultured for 12 h. After centrifugation, the Agrobacterium liquid was suspended in an MMA liquid medium and mixed in a 1:1 proportion of MdWRKY31-RFP:P19 for 4–5 h. A 500 μl suspension liquid was injected into the leaves of Nicotiana benthamiana. Images were taken with a two-photon laser confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss;German) at 3–4 days after the plants were transferred to a growth chamber with a temperature of 25 °C and a 16-h photoperiod.

Construction of vectors and obtained transgenic lines

To construct MdWRKY31 overexpression vectors, the ORF of MdWRKY31 was digested with SalI/KpnI and cloned into GFP plant transformation vectors downstream of the CaMV 35S promoter. The MdWRKY31-GFP vector was then transformed into Agrobacterium rhizogenes pRi2659 (Weidi Biotechnology, Shanghai, China). According to the Agrobacterium conversion method, the MdWRKY31-GFP vector was successfully genetically introduced into the roots of apple plants.

A specific sequence of MdWRKY31 via primers MdWRKY31-FR-F and MdWRKY31-FR-R was inserted into the pENTRTM Directional TOPO vector. The LR was used to insert the specific fragment of MdWRKY31 into the pK7GWIWG2 vector to construct a MdWRKY31-RFP vector. The resulting MdWRKY31-RFP vector was genetically introduced into apple plant roots according to Agrobacterium rhizogenes MSU44-mediated transformation as described by Ma et al.40. The primers used in this paper are detailed in Table S1.

Analysis of gene expression

TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) was used to extract the total RNA from ‘Royal Gala’ tissues (calli and seedlings), Arabidopsis, and Nicotiana benthamiana. cDNA synthesis was executed with a PrimeScriptTM RT reagent kit (TaKaRa, Dalian, China). Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was used to test the MdWRKY31 expression level in response to ABA, NaCl, 4 °C, and PEG4000. In different transgenic Arabidopsis, Nicotiana benthamiana, and apple tissues, MdActin (GenBank accession number CN938024) was used as the reference gene.

For qRT-PCR, mixed solutions were executed with iQ SYBR Green Supermix in an iCycler iQ5 system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Analyses of specific mRNA levels were performed using relative quantification via the cycle threshold (Ct) 2-ΔΔCt method. Each assay was carried out for three biological replicates. PCR profiles were determined on the basis of the following protocol: preincubation at 95 °C for 5 min; 30 cycles of 95 °C (30 s), 58 °C (30 s), and 72 °C (30 s); and a 72 °C (5 min) final extension. The corresponding primers used are listed in Table S1.

Determination of the relative water content and chlorophyll content

The relative water content (RWC) was determined based on the method described by Ma et al.40 as follows: RWC = (fresh weight – dry weight)/(rehydrated weight – dry weight).

Similarly, the chlorophyll content was measured according to the method described by An et al.58 as follows:

Ca = 13.95D665 − 6.88D649

Cb = 24.96D649 − 6.88D665

Chlorophyll content = Ca + Cb

MDA content and NBT staining

As described by Ma et al.40, the absorbance at 450, 532, and 600 nm was measured with an UV/vis spectrophotometer (UV‐2450). MDA levels were calculated as follows: MDA content (mmol/g FW) ¼[6.542*(OD532−OD600)−0.559*OD450] (mmol/L)*V (ml)/fresh weight (g FW).

Leaves soaked in NBT staining buffer (0.5 mg/ml) were vacuum treated for 20 min for better dyeing. The samples were then stained for 8 h in darkness at 28 °C and then boiled for 5 min with ethanol:lactic acid:glycerin (3:1:1) in a fixative solution until the chlorophyll was removed and the samples cooled. Anhydrous alcohol was then added prior to observations.

GUS analysis

Apple calli were used for transient expression assays. Wild-type promoters of MdRAV1, MdABI3, and MdABI4 were cloned into p1300-GN, which was fused to the GUS reporter gene. The constructed pMdRAV1::GUS plasmids (the pMdABI3::GUS plasmid and pMdABI4::GUS plasmid) were transformed into apple calli via the Agrobacterium-mediated method. 35S::MdWRKY31 (35S::MdRAV1) was then cotransformed into the pMdRAV1::GUS (pMdABI3::GUS and pMdABI4::GUS) and p1300-GN::GUS transgenic calli. Finally, histochemical staining was conducted to measure the GUS activity in the treated calli using the method described by Zhao et al. (2016)59.

Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) qPCR analysis

The 35::MdWRKY31::GFP and 35::GFP transgenic calli were used for a ChIP assay. An anti-GFP antibody (Beyotime, Haimen, China) was applied to ChIP-qPCR as described by Hu et al.60. Immunoprecipitated samples were used as templates for the qPCR assay with primers listed in Table S1.

Electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSAs)

An EMSA was performed as described by Xie et al.61. MdWRKY31 and MdRAV1 were cloned into the expression vector pET-32a(+). The MdWRKY31-HIS and MdRAV1-HIS recombinant proteins were expressed in Escherichia coli strain BL21 and purified using a His Microspin Purification kit (Tiangen, Beijing, China). The oligonucleotide probes of the MdRAV1, MdABI3, and MdABI4 promoters were labeled by a company (Sangon Biotech, Beijing, China). The binding specificity was determined by measuring its competition with excess unlabeled oligonucleotides. The primers used are listed in Table S1.

Statistical analysis

Appropriate methods using R (3.0.2) with the R Commander package were employed to analyze three parallel experiments statistically. Mean differences between the bars are significant at the P0.05 level for different letters but not significant at the P0.05 level for the same letters.