Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

An evaluation of optometric advanced skills within a UK tertiary based setting

A Correction to this article was published on 13 February 2024

This article has been updated

Abstract

Introduction

Hospital-based optometrists are undertaking extended roles across ophthalmology that may require them to perform advanced skills (AS). Moorfields Eye Hospital (MEH) is the largest UK employer of hospital-based optometrists, it was sought to investigate which AS are being performed at this centre and how they align to the four pillars of advanced clinical practice (ACP).

Methods

An online survey was sent to MEH optometrists in May 2022 that asked about professional status, sub-specialties worked, qualifications, acquisition and validation of AS, research and leadership.

Results

Ninety-six optometrists with mean post-qualification experience was 16.2 years (SD 10.4) responded to the survey. There were 84 AS that covered clinical, leadership and research, with respondents achieving a mean of 11.8 (SD 10.3). Those with independent prescribing (IP) qualifications (n = 52) had a higher number of AS compared to non-IP optometrists (p = 0.03). There were 68 clinical AS across the sub-specialties (23 clinical AS were common in ≥2 sub-specialties), 49 out of 120 clinical AS could be performed by at least 60% of staff. Twenty-six optometrists identified with leadership, 56 had undertaken research/audit, 27 had published within a peer-reviewed journal and half of the time spent in active research was funded.

Conclusion

AS are being performed by optometrists within a tertiary eye hospital that supports ACP. IP optometrists had higher self-reported AS but current educational frameworks don’t accommodate for some AS. Targeted AS courses with competency-based sign-off may further support high-quality patient care. Further research is required on how advanced care practitioners can support workforce transformation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Number of optometrists and sessions worked per service.
Fig. 2: Number of optometrists that can perform each clinical skill.
Fig. 3: Percentage of staff that could perform advanced skills in Accident and Emergency and were signed off.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated from the current study are not publicly available due to data use agreements with MEH. Requests for data will require approval from MEH and the signing of data access agreements; requests can be submitted to the corresponding author.

Change history

References

  1. Fight for Sight. Time to focus. 2020. https://www.fightforsight.org.uk/media/3302/time-to-focus-report.pdf.

  2. Greenwood V, Stanford P, Beddow C, Bowen M, Hingorani M. Changing practice for the non-medical ophthalmic hospital workforce in the UK—a snapshot survey. Eye. 2021;35:1886–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Harper R, Creer R, Jackson J, Ehrlich D, Tompkin A, Bowen M, et al. Scope of practice of optometrists working in the UK Hospital eye service: a national survey. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2016;36:197–206.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gunn PJG, Creer RC, Bowen M, Tromans C, Jackson AJ, Tompkin AP, et al. Scope of practice of optometrists working in the UK Hospital Eye Service: second national survey. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2022;42:428–39.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Royal College of Ophthalmologists. The way forward. Glaucoma. 2017. https://www.rcophth.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/RCOphth-The-Way-Forward-Glaucoma-300117.pdf.

  6. Health Education England. The ophthalmic common clinical competency framework (OCCCF). 2019. https://www.hee.nhs.uk/our-work/advanced-clinical-practice/ophthalmology-common-clinical-competency-framework-curriculum.

  7. College of Optometrists. Higher qualifications. 2022. https://www.college-optometrists.org/professional-development/further-qualifications/higher-qualifications.

  8. Harper RA, Gunn PJG, Spry PGD, Fenerty CH, Crabb DP, Bowen M. Transforming glaucoma care pathways: current glaucoma accreditation in UK optometry. Eye. 2022;36:676–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Health Education England. 2022. https://www.hee.nhs.uk/our-work/advanced-clinical-practice/ophthalmology-common-clinical-competency-framework-curriculum.

  10. Royal College of Ophthalmologists. The way forward. Age-related macular degeneration and diabetic retinopathy. 2017. https://www.rcophth.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/RCOphth-The-Way-Forward-AMD-300117.pdf.

  11. NICE. Glaucoma: diagnosis and management: National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence. 2017. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng81/evidence/full-guideline-pdf-4660991389.

  12. AOP. Understanding the ophthalmology backlog. 2022. https://www.aop.org.uk/ot/professional-support/health-services/2022/06/11/understanding-the-ophthalmology-backlog.

  13. College of Optometrists. Scheme for Registration. 2023. https://www.college-optometrists.org/qualifying/scheme-for-registration.

  14. Cottrell P, North R, Sheen N, Ryan B. Optometry independent prescribing during COVID lockdown in Wales. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2022;42:1289–303.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Ansari E, Patel M, Harle D. Acute community ophthalmology services provided by independent prescribing optometrists supporting hospital eye services during the COVID-19 outbreak. J Optom. 2022;15:175–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Todd D, Bartlett H, Thampy R, Dhawahir-Scala F, Wilson H, Tromans C. Agreement in clinical decision-making between independent prescribing optometrists and consultant ophthalmologists in an emergency eye department. Eye. 2020;34:2284–94.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Harper RA, Gunn PJG, Spry PGD, Fenerty CH, Lawrenson JG. Care pathways for glaucoma detection and monitoring in the UK. Eye. 2020;34:89–102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Royal College of Ophthalmologists. Joint RCOphth and UKEGS glaucoma risk stratification Tool. 2020. https://glaucoma.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Glaucoma-Risk-Stratification-Tool-1.pdf.

  19. Konstantakopoulou E, Edgar DF, Harper RA, Baker H, Sutton M, Janikoun S, et al. Evaluation of a minor eye conditions scheme delivered by community optometrists. BMJ Open. 2016;6:e011832.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Department of Health and Social Care. The future of UK clinical research delivery: 2022 to 2025 implementation plan. 2022. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-future-of-uk-clinical-research-delivery-2022-to-2025-implementation-plan.

  21. Taylor LJ, Hobby A, Bowen M, Jolly JK, MacLaren RE. Harnessing the potential of practice-based clinical optometry research in the United Kingdom. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2023;43:239–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Marufu TC, Collins A, Vargas L, Gillespie L, Almghairbi D. Factors influencing retention among hospital nurses: systematic review. Br J Nurs. 2021;30:302–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lumbers M. Approaches to leadership and managing change in the NHS. Br J Nurs. 2018;27:554–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. NHS. NHS Leadership Academy. 2023. https://www.leadershipacademy.nhs.uk/programmes/.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank service leads for their help in devising and disseminating the questionnaire amongst staff. This work was supported in part by the National Institute for Health & Care Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre at Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology (PJM). The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AJ: Conceptualization, planning; data acquisition; data analysis; transcripts. SA: survey development, PJM, VA and DS; critical appraisal.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anish Jindal.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Due to a typesetting error, references 17 and 18 were added by mistake. They have now both been removed. Consequently, the following sentence should not have had any in-text citations: “The findings of our current work supports the hypothesis that the IP qualification encourages clinicians to undertake further professional development”.

Supplementary information

Supplementary 1.

Advanced Skills Questionnaire

Supplementary Figure 1.

Number of clinical advanced skills and number of clinical advanced skills where 60% or more of staff (optometrists) can perform per service. LVA, Low Vision;, Paeds, Paediatrics; CL, Contact Lenses; MR, Medical Retina; UCC, Urgent Care Clinics, A&E, Accident and Emergency.

Supplementary Figure 2.

Percentage of staff that could perform advanced skills in Cataract and were signed off. YAG, Yttrium aluminium garnet

Supplementary Figure 3.

Percentage of staff that could perform advanced skills in Glaucoma and were signed off. SLT, Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty; YAG, Yttrium aluminium garnet

Supplementary Figure 4.

Percentage of staff that could perform advanced skills in Paediatrics and were signed off. OCT, Optical Coherence Tomography

Supplementary Figure 5.

Percentage of staff that could perform advanced skills in Low Vision and were signed off.

Supplementary Figure 6.

Percentage of staff that could perform advanced skills in External Disease and were signed off. OCT, Optical Coherence Tomography

Supplementary Figure 7.

Percentage of staff that could perform advanced skills in Urgent Care Clinics and were signed off. OCT, Optical Coherence Tomography

Supplementary Figure 8.

Percentage of staff that could perform advanced skills in Medical Retina and were signed off.

Supplementary Figure 9.

Percentage of staff that could perform advanced skills in Contact Lenses.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jindal, A., Abdulrasid, S., Mulholland, P.J. et al. An evaluation of optometric advanced skills within a UK tertiary based setting. Eye 38, 1276–1282 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-023-02880-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-023-02880-7

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links