In clinical trials and real-world data, eyes with worse baseline vision frequently demonstrate greater visual benefit [1,2,3]. This can be attributed to the “ceiling effect” of higher visual acuities (with less room for improvement). Sometimes, an observed decline in acuity in those with better baseline vision is taken to support earlier intervention. However, “regression to the mean” is also likely to contribute: in any measurement having variability (including measurement error or fluctuations in biological state), more extreme initial values are likely, on subsequent measurements, to be closer to the mean. We investigated this effect by analysing visual acuity measurements in untreated fellow eyes.
We explored visual acuity measurements in untreated eyes, comparing changes in the top and bottom quintile visual acuities at consecutive visits, both forwards and backwards in time. Measurements from patients undergoing unilateral antiVEGF treatment (for neovascular AMD or for retinal vein occlusion macular oedema) in the intravitreal injection services of the authors were included. The retrospective database search covered a 5.5 year period. For each patient, acuities at the first two consecutive time points (providing these were ≤90 days) were included, excluding those with visual acuities <10 ETDRS letters at either visit. Mean acuities for the top 20% and bottom 20% at Visit 1 were compared with those at Visit 2. The same was done for the top and bottom 20% at the second visit (comparing with Visit 1).
1375 patients met the inclusion criteria. Mean (SD) interval between visits was 31.0 (7.7) days (ranging from 3 to 89 days). Mean (SD) acuities overall were 74.3 (15.9) and 74.7 (16.1) letters at first and second visits respectively. For the top quintile (n = 275) at Visit 1, mean acuity was lower at Visit 2 (mean difference 1.0 letters, p < 0.0001); for the bottom quintile at Visit 1, mean visual acuity was higher at Visit 2 (mean difference 2.3 letters, p < 0.0001). For the top quintile at Visit 2, mean acuity was lower at Visit 1 (mean difference 1.5 letters, p < 0.0001). For the bottom quintile at Visit 2, mean acuity was higher at Visit 1 (mean difference 1.6 letters, p = 0.0039). Figure 1 shows mean acuities by quintile.
The phenomenon of regression to the mean was thus observed. In eyes undergoing no intervention, those in the top quintile appeared to lose vision, whilst those in the lowest quintile appeared to gain vision. This was regardless of whether one looked forwards or backwards in time, and the difference achieved strong apparent statistical significance. However, the effect was small (between 1 and 2.3 letters) in our cohort. Nevertheless, we recommend that the phenomenon should be considered whenever comparing outcomes in subgroups that have been stratified by baseline values of the same parameter. In eyes with active disease, where there is often greater variability or fluctuation in vision, the effect might be greater. The regression to the mean effect has also been reported in laser refractive surgery [4] and as an explanation for why a simulated switch between different antiVEGF agents could appear to bring about visual gains [5, 6].
Data availability
The data processed for the analysis in this manuscript are available on request.
References
Ying GS, Huang J, Maguire MG, Jaffe GJ, Grunwald JE, Toth C, et al. Baseline predictors for one-year visual outcomes with ranibizumab or bevacizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology. 2013;120:122–9.
Gale R, Pikoula M, Lee AY, Denaxas S, Egan C, Tufail A, et al. Real world evidence on 5661 patients treated for macular oedema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion with intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor, intravitreal dexamethasone or macular laser. Br J Ophthalmol. 2021;105:549–54.
Ciulla T, Pollack JS, Williams DF. Visual acuity outcomes and anti-VEGF therapy intensity in macular oedema due to retinal vein occlusion: a real-world analysis of 15 613 patient eyes. Br J Ophthalmol. 2021;105:1696–704.
Aaron MT, Applegate RA, Porter J, Thibos LN, Schallhorn SC, Brunstetter TJ, et al. Why preoperative acuity predicts postoperative acuity in wavefront-guided LASIK. Optom Vis Sci. 2010;87:861–6.
Ferris FL 3rd, Maguire MG, Glassman AR, Ying GS, Martin DF. Evaluating effects of switching anti-vascular endothelial growth factor drugs for age-related macular degeneration and diabetic macular Edema. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017;135:145–9.
Zarbin M, Tsuboi M, Hill LF, Stoilov I. Simulating an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor switch in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: A HARBOR Subanalysis. Ophthalmology. 2019;126:849–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.01.003.
Funding
OAM is funded by the Wellcome Trust (206619_Z_17_Z). The authors acknowledge support from the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Moorfields Eye Hospital and the UCL Institute of Ophthalmology. The views expressed in this work are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the funding bodies.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Study design and conception: OAM. Data collection, analysis and interpretation: all authors. Drafting manuscript: OAM. Revision: all authors. Approval of final version: all authors.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Preston, E., Hamilton, R.D. & Mahroo, O.A. Exploring regression to the mean in visual acuities by investigating measurements at two consecutive time points in untreated fellow eyes. Eye 37, 2356–2357 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-022-02349-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-022-02349-z
This article is cited by
-
A cross-sectional study to assess the clinical utility of modern visual function assessments in patients with inherited retinal disease: a mixed methods observational study protocol
BMC Ophthalmology (2023)
-
Systematic Review of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Disease Activity Criteria Use to Shorten, Maintain or Extend Treatment Intervals with Anti-VEGF in Clinical Trials: Implications for Clinical Practice
Ophthalmology and Therapy (2023)