Correction to: Refractory full thickness macular hole: current surgical management

Correction to: Eye

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-020-01330-y

The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake. Figures 3 and 5 were incomplete. The corrected figures are given below. The original article has been corrected.

Fig. 3: Forest plot from meta-analysis of weighted closure rate of refractory full thickness macular hole (FTMH) for all articles.

No significant difference in refractory FTMH closure rate among the 36 articles was detected.

Fig. 5: Forest plot from meta-analysis of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) gain among the 32 analysed articles.

Significant difference in BCVA gain among the surgical technique subgroups was demonstrated.