Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review Article
  • Published:

Dutch pharmacogenetics working group (DPWG) guideline for the gene–drug interaction between UGT1A1 and irinotecan

European Journal of Human Genetics volume 31, pages 982–987 (2023)Cite this article

Subjects

A Correction to this article was published on 16 February 2023

This article has been updated

Abstract

The Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group (DPWG) aims to facilitate PGx implementation by developing evidence-based pharmacogenetics guidelines to optimize pharmacotherapy. This guideline describes the starting dose optimization of the anti-cancer drug irinotecan to decrease the risk of severe toxicity, such as (febrile) neutropenia or diarrhoea. Uridine diphosphate glucuronosyl transferase 1A1 (UGT1A1 encoded by the UGT1A1 gene) enzyme deficiency increases risk of irinotecan-induced toxicity. Gene variants leading to UGT1A1 enzyme deficiency (e.g. UGT1A1*6, *28 and *37) can be used to optimize an individual’s starting dose thereby preventing carriers from toxicity. Homozygous or compound heterozygous carriers of these allele variants are defined as UGT1A1 poor metabolisers (PM). DPWG recommends a 70% starting dose in PM patients and no dose reduction in IM patients who start treatment with irinotecan. Based on the DPWG clinical implication score, UGT1A1 genotyping is considered “essential”, indicating that UGT1A1 testing must be performed prior to initiating irinotecan treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Irinotecan metabolism. Irinotecan and its metabolites are presented in rectangles.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data and material are either included in the supplementary information or publicly available (i.e. the published articles, PubMed). The guidelines and background information are available on the website of the Royal Dutch Pharmacists Association (KNMP) (Pharmacogenetic Recommendation Text. Available from: https://www.knmp.nl/).

Change history

References

  1. Swen J, Wilting I, Goede A, de, Grandia L, Mulder H, Touw D, et al. Pharmacogenetics: From Bench to Byte. Clin Pharm Ther. 2008;83:781–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.clpt.6100507.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Guchelaar H-J. Pharmacogenomics, a novel section in the European Journal of Human Genetics. Eur J Hum Genet. 2018;26:1399–400. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-018-0205-4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Lunenburg CATC, van der Wouden CH, Nijenhuis M, Crommentuijn-van Rhenen MH, de Boer-Veger NJ, Buunk AM, et al. Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group (DPWG) guideline for the gene–drug interaction of DPYD and fluoropyrimidines. Eur J Hum Genet. 2020;28:508–17. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-019-0540-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Matic M, Nijenhuis M, Soree B, de Boer-Veger NJ, Buunk A-M, Houwink EJF, et al. Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group (DPWG) guideline for the gene-drug interaction between CYP2D6 and opioids (codeine, tramadol and oxycodone). Eur J Hum Genet. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-021-00920-y.

  5. Brouwer JMJL, Nijenhuis M, Soree B, Guchelaar H-J, Swen JJ, van Schaik RHN, et al. Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group (DPWG) guideline for the gene-drug interaction between CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 and SSRIs. Eur J Hum Genet. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-021-01004-7.

  6. Rougier P, Bugat R. CPT-11 in the treatment of colorectal cancer: clinical efficacy and safety profile. Semin Oncol. 1996;23:34–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rothenberg ML. Efficacy and toxicity of irinotecan in patients with colorectal cancer. Semin Oncol. 1998;25:39–46.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bosma PJ, Chowdhury JR, Bakker C, Gantla S, de Boer A, Oostra BA, et al. The genetic basis of the reduced expression of bilirubin UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1 in Gilbert’s Syndrome. N. Engl J Med. 1995;333:1171–5. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199511023331802.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. UGT1A1 allele nomenclature n.d. https://www.pharmacogenomics.pha.ulaval.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/UGT1A1-allele-nomenclature.html (accessed September 6, 2021).

  10. Karczewski KJ, Francioli LC, Tiao G, Cummings BB, Alföldi J, Wang Q, et al. Variation across 141,456 human exomes and genomes reveals the spectrum of loss-of-function intolerance across human protein-coding genes. BioRxiv. 2019:531210. https://doi.org/10.1101/531210.

  11. Akiyama Y, Fujita K, Nagashima F, Yamamoto W, Endo H, Sunakawa Y, et al. Genetic testing for UGT1A1*28 and *6 in Japanese patients who receive irinotecan chemotherapy. Ann Oncol. 2008;19:2089–90. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdn645.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Teh LK, Hashim H, Zakaria ZA, Salleh MZ. Polymorphisms of UGT1A1*6, UGT1A1*27 & UGT1A1*28 in three major ethnic groups from Malaysia. Indian J Med Res. 2012;136:249–59.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Sung C, Lee PL, Tan LL, Toh DSL. Pharmacogenetic risk for adverse reactions to irinotecan in the major ethnic populations of Singapore. Drug Saf. 2011;34:1167–75. https://doi.org/10.2165/11594440-000000000-00000.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Akaba K, Kimura T, Sasaki A, Tanabe S, Ikegami T, Hashimoto M, et al. Neonatal hyperbilirubinemia and mutation of the bilirubin uridine diphosphate-glucuronosyltransferase gene: a common missense mutation among Japanese, Koreans and Chinese. Biochem Mol Biol Int. 1998;46:21–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/15216549800203512.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. de Man FM, Goey AKL, van Schaik RHN, Mathijssen RHJ, Bins S. Individualization of irinotecan treatment: a review of pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacogenetics. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2018;57:1229–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40262-018-0644-7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Goetz MP, McKean HA, Reid JM, Mandrekar SJ, Tan AD, Kuffel MA, et al. UGT1A1 genotype-guided phase i study of irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and capecitabine. Invest N. Drugs. 2013;31:1559–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-013-0034-9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Denlinger CS, Blanchard R, Xu L, Bernaards C, Litwin S, Spittle C, et al. Pharmacokinetic analysis of irinotecan plus bevacizumab in patients with advanced solid tumors. Cancer Chemother Pharm. 2009;65:97–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-009-1008-7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Iyer L, Das S, Janisch L, Wen M, Ramírez J, Karrison T, et al. UGT1A1*28 polymorphism as a determinant of irinotecan disposition and toxicity. Pharmacogenomics J. 2002;2:43–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.tpj.6500072.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. de Jong FA, Kehrer DFS, Mathijssen RHJ, Creemers G, de Bruijn P, van Schaik RHN, et al. Prophylaxis of irinotecan‐induced diarrhea with neomycin and potential role for UGT1A1*28 genotype screening: a double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled study. Oncologist. 2006;11:944–54. https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.11-8-944.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Paoluzzi L, Singh AS, Price DK, Danesi R, Mathijssen RHJ, Verweij J, et al. Influence of genetic variants in UGT1A1 and UGT1A9 on the in vivo glucuronidation of SN-38. J Clin Pharm. 2004;44:854–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091270004267159.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Innocenti F, Undevia SD, Iyer L, Chen PX, Das S, Kocherginsky M, et al. Genetic variants in the UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 gene predict the risk of severe neutropenia of irinotecan. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:1382–8. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2004.07.173.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hulshof EC, de With M, de Man FM, Creemers GJ, Deiman BALM, Swen JJ, et al. UGT1A1 genotype-guided dosing of irinotecan: a prospective safety and cost analysis in poor metaboliser patients. Eur J Cancer. 2022;162:148–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EJCA.2021.12.009.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hu ZY, Yu Q, Pei Q, Guo C. Dose-dependent association between UGT1A1*28 genotype and irinotecan-induced neutropenia: Low doses also increase risk. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16:3832–42. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-1122.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Liu X, Cheng D, Kuang Q, Liu G, Xu W. Association of UGT1A1*28 polymorphisms with irinotecan-induced toxicities in colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis in Caucasians. Pharmacogenomics J. 2014;14:120–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/tpj.2013.10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lu CY, Huang CW, Wu IC, Tsai HL, Ma CJ, Yeh YS, et al. Clinical implication of UGT1A1 promoter polymorphism for irinotecan dose escalation in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with bevacizumab combined with FOLFIRI in the first-line setting. Transl Oncol. 2015;8:474–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranon.2015.11.002.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Minami H, Sai K, Saeki M, Saito Y, Ozawa S, Suzuki K, et al. Irinotecan pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics and UGT1A genetic polymorphisms in Japanese: roles of UGT1A1*6 and *28. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2007;17:497–504. https://doi.org/10.1097/FPC.0b013e328014341f.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Pirmohamed M, Hughes DA. Pharmacogenetic tests: the need for a level playing field. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2013;12:3–4. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd3921.

  28. Swen JJ, Huizinga TW, Gelderblom H, de Vries EGE, Assendelft WJJ, Kirchheiner J, et al. Translating pharmacogenomics: challenges on the road to the clinic. PLoS Med. 2007;4:e209. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0040209.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Swen JJ, Nijenhuis M, van Rhenen M, de Boer-Veger NJ, Buunk AM, Houwink EJF, et al. Pharmacogenetic information in clinical guidelines: The European perspective. Clin Pharm Ther. 2018;103:795–801. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.1049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Etienne-Grimaldi MC, Boyer JC, Thomas F, Quaranta S, Picard N, Loriot MA, et al. UGT1A1 genotype and irinotecan therapy: general review and implementation in routine practice. Fundam Clin Pharm. 2015;29:219–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/fcp.12117.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. AIOM - SIF. Raccomandazioni par analisi farmacogenetiche n.d. https://www.aiom.it/raccomandazioni-2019-per-analisi-farmacogenetiche/ (accessed November 15, 2021).

  32. Stanford University & St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital. Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium. PharmGKB PGRN 2020. https://cpicpgx.org/ (accessed May 8, 2020).

Download references

Funding

The U-PGx consortium received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 668353. The DPWG received funding from the Royal Dutch Pharmacists Association.

Author information

Author notes

  1. These authors contributed equally: Emma C. Hulshof, Maarten J. Deenen.

  2. These authors jointly supervised this work: Henk-Jan Guchelaar, Jesse J. Swen.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands

    Emma C. Hulshof & Maarten J. Deenen

  2. Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands

    Emma C. Hulshof, Maarten J. Deenen, Henk-Jan Guchelaar & Jesse J. Swen

  3. Royal Dutch Pharmacists Association (KNMP), The Hague, The Netherlands

    Marga Nijenhuis & Bianca Soree

  4. Pharmacy Boterdiep, Groningen, The Netherlands

    Nienke J. de Boer-Veger

  5. Pharmacy De Katwijkse Apotheek, Katwijk, The Netherlands

    Anne-Marie Buunk

  6. Department of Public Health and Primary Care (PHEG), Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands

    Elisa J. F. Houwink

  7. National eHealth Living Lab (NELL), Leiden, The Netherlands

    Elisa J. F. Houwink

  8. Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Wilhelmina Hospital, Assen, The Netherlands

    Arne Risselada

  9. Department of Internal Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

    Gerard A. P. J. M. Rongen

  10. Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

    Gerard A. P. J. M. Rongen

  11. Department of Clinical Chemistry, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

    Ron H. N. van Schaik

  12. Department of Clinical Pharmacy & Pharmacology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

    Daan J. Touw

  13. Department of PharmacoTherapy, -Epidemiology & -Economics, Groningen Research Institute of Pharmacy, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

    Daan J. Touw

  14. Department of Clinical Chemistry, St. Jansdal Hospital, Harderwijk, The Netherlands

    Jan van der Weide

  15. Department of Psychiatry, Parnassia Group, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Roos van Westrhenen

  16. Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands

    Roos van Westrhenen

  17. Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience (IoPPN), King’s College London, London, UK

    Roos van Westrhenen

  18. Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Division Laboratories, Pharmacy and Biomedical Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands

    Vera H. M. Deneer

  19. Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS), Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands

    Vera H. M. Deneer

Authors
  1. Emma C. Hulshof
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Maarten J. Deenen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Marga Nijenhuis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Bianca Soree
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Nienke J. de Boer-Veger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Anne-Marie Buunk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Elisa J. F. Houwink
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Arne Risselada
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Gerard A. P. J. M. Rongen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Ron H. N. van Schaik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Daan J. Touw
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Jan van der Weide
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Roos van Westrhenen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Vera H. M. Deneer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Henk-Jan Guchelaar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Jesse J. Swen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

ECH and MJD drafted the manuscript. JJS and HJG supervised drafting of the manuscript and contributed to conceiving the work and interpretation of the results. MN performed most of the literature searches and article summaries, and suggested clinical decision support texts. BS had the clinical decision support texts translated in English and published them. NBV, AB, EJHF, AR, GAR, RHNS, DT, JW, and RW contributed to conceiving the work and interpretation of the results. VHMD led the meetings in which the DPWG decided about the article summaries and clinical decision supports texts and contributed to conceiving the work and interpretation of the results. In addition, all authors revised the manuscript and approved the final version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marga Nijenhuis.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original online version of this article was revised: Supplementary table 3 has been corrected.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hulshof, E.C., Deenen, M.J., Nijenhuis, M. et al. Dutch pharmacogenetics working group (DPWG) guideline for the gene–drug interaction between UGT1A1 and irinotecan. Eur J Hum Genet 31, 982–987 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-022-01243-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-022-01243-2

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links