Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Expanding the speech and language phenotype in Koolen-de Vries syndrome: late onset and periodic stuttering a novel feature

Abstract

Speech and language impairment is core in Koolen-de Vries syndrome (KdVS), yet only one study has examined this empirically. Here we define speech, language, and functional/adaptive behaviour in KdVS; while deeply characterising the medical/neurodevelopmental phenotype in the largest cohort to date. Speech, language, literacy, and social skills were assessed using standardised measures, alongside an in-depth health and medical questionnaire. 81 individuals with KdVS were recruited (35 female, mean age 9y 10mo), 56 of whom harboured the typical 500–650 kb 17q21.31 deletion. The core medical phenotype was intellectual disability (largely moderate), eye anomalies/vision disturbances, structural brain anomalies, dental problems, sleep disturbance, musculoskeletal abnormalities, and cardiac defects. Most were verbal (62/81, 76.5%), while minimally-verbal communicators used alternative and augmentative communication (AAC) successfully in spite of speech production delays. Speech was characterised by apraxia (39/61, 63.9%) and dysarthria (28/61, 45.9%) in verbal participants. Stuttering was described in 36/47 (76.6%) verbal participants and followed a unique trajectory of late onset and fluctuating presence. Receptive and expressive language abilities were commensurate with one another, but literacy skills remained a relative weakness. Social competence, successful behavioural/emotional control, and coping skills were areas of relative strength, while communication difficulties impacted daily living skills as an area of comparative difficulty. Notably, KdVS individuals make communication gains beyond childhood and should continue to access targeted therapies throughout development, including early AAC implementation, motor speech therapy, language/literacy intervention, as well as strategies implemented to successfully navigate activities of daily living that rely on effective communication.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1
Fig. 2: Box and whisker plot of Vineland-3 adaptive behaviour domain standard scores according to genetic anomaly (i.e., comparing typical 17q21.31 deletions, larger 17q21.31 deletions, and KANSL1 variants) for individuals with KdVS in this cohort.
Fig. 3: Stuttering related characteristics in individuals with KdVS in this cohort.
Fig. 4: Prevalence of comorbidities.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Koolen DA, Vissers LE, Pfundt R, de Leeuw N, Knight SJ, Regan R, et al. A new chromosome 17q21.31 microdeletion syndrome associated with a common inversion polymorphism. Nat Genet. 2006;38:999–1001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Koolen DA, Sharp AJ, Hurst JA, Firth HV, Knight SJ, Goldenberg A, et al. Clinical and molecular delineation of the 17q21.31 microdeletion syndrome. J Med Genet. 2008;45:710–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Koolen DA, Kramer JM, Neveling K, Nillesen WM, Moore-Barton HL, Elmslie FV, et al. Mutations in the chromatin modifier gene KANSL1 cause the 17q21.31 microdeletion syndrome. Nat Genet. 2012;44:639–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Zollino M, Orteschi D, Murdolo M, Lattante S, Battaglia D, Stefanini C, et al. Mutations in KANSL1 cause the 17q21.31 microdeletion syndrome phenotype. Nat Genet. 2012;44:636–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Koolen DA, Pfundt R, Linda K, Beunders G, Veenstra-Knol HE, Conta JH, et al. The Koolen-de Vries syndrome: a phenotypic comparison of patients with a 17q21.31 microdeletion versus a KANSL1 sequence variant. Eur J Hum Genet. 2016;24:652–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Koolen DA, Morgan A, de Vries BBA. Koolen-de Vries syndrome. [Updated 2019 Jun 13]. In: Adam MP, Everman DB, Mirzaa GM, et al., editors. GeneReviews® [Internet]. Seattle (WA): University of Washington; 2010.

  7. Morgan AT, Haaften LV, van Hulst K, Edley C, Mei C, Tan TY, et al. Early speech development in Koolen de Vries syndrome limited by oral praxis and hypotonia. Eur J Hum Genet. 2018;26:75–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Egger JI, Wingbermühle E, Verhoeven WM, Dijkman M, Radke S, de Bruijn ER, et al. Hypersociability in the behavioral phenotype of 17q21.31 microdeletion syndrome. Am J Med Genet A 2013;161A:21–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.35652

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Morgan A, Braden R, Wong MMK, Colin E, Amor D, Liégeois F, et al. Speech and language deficits are central to SETBP1 haploinsufficiency disorder. Eur J Hum Genet. 2021;29:1216–25. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-021-00894-x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Morison LD, Braden RO, Amor DJ, Brignell A, van Bon BWM, Morgan AT. Social motivation a relative strength in DYRK1A syndrome on a background of significant speech and language impairments. Eur J Hum Genet. 2022; 30:800–81.

  11. Sparrow SS, Cicchetti DV, Saulnier CA. Vineland adaptive behaviour scales. 3rd ed. Bloomington, IN: Pearson; 2016.

  12. Bishop DV. Children’s communication checklist (CCC-2). London: Pearson; 2003.

  13. Wetherby AM, Prizant BM. Communication and symbolic behavior scales: developmental profile. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes; 2002.

  14. Dodd BH, Hua Z, Crosbie S, Holm A, Ozanne A. Diagnostic evaluation of articulation and phonology. London: The Psychological Corporation; 2002.

  15. Duffy JR. Motor speech disorders: substrates, differential diagnosis and management. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 2013.

  16. Braden RO, Boyce JO, Stutterd CA, Pope K, Goel H, Leventer RJ, et al. Speech, language, and oromotor skills in patients with polymicrogyria. Neurology. 2021;96:e1898–e1912.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mei C, Fedorenko E, Amor DJ, Boys A, Hoeflin C, Carew P, et al. Deep phenotyping of speech and language skills in individuals with 16p11.2 deletion. EJHG. 2018;26:676–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Gozzard H, Baker E, McCabe P. Children’s productions of polysyllables. ACQuiring Knowledge in Speech, Language and Hearing. 2006;8:113–6.

  19. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA). Childhood Apraxia of Speech [Internet]. Rockville, MD: ASHA; 2021.

  20. Onslow M, Webber M, Harrison E, Arnott S, Bridgman K, Carey B, et al.The Lidcombe Program Treatment Guide. Lidcombe Program Trainers Consortium (2017).

  21. Van Borsel J, Tetnowski JA. Fluency disorders in genetic syndromes. J Fluen Disord. 2007;32:279–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yairi E, Ambrose N. Epidemiology of stuttering: 21st century advances. J Fluen Disord. 2013;38:66–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfludis.2012.11.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Boyce JO, Jackson VE, van Reyk O, Parker R, Vogel AP, Eising E, et al. Self-reported impact of developmental stuttering across the lifespan. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2022;64:1297–306.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kefalianos E, Onslow M, Packman A, Vogel A, Pezic A, Mensah F, et al. The history of stuttering by 7 years of age: follow-up of a prospective community cohort. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017;60:2828–39. https://doi.org/10.1044/2017_JSLHR-S-16-0205

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Howell P, Davis S, Williams R. Late childhood stuttering. JSLHR. 2008;51:669–87.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Tichenor SE, Yaruss JS. Variability of stuttering: behavior and impact. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2021;30:75–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Morgan A, Liégeois F, Vargha-Khadem F. Motor speech profile in relation to site of brain pathology: a developmental perspective. In Maassen B, van Lieshout P, editors. Speech motor control: new developments in basic and applied research. Oxford: Oxford Academic; 2010).

  28. Brignell A, Krahe M, Downes M, Kefalianos E, Reilly S, Morgan A. Interventions for children and adolescents who stutter: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and evidence map. J Fluen Disord. 2021;70:105843 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfludis.2021.105843

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Brignell A, Krahe M, Downes M, Kefalianos E, Reilly S, Morgan AT. A systematic review of interventions for adults who stutter. J Fluen Disord. 2020;64:105766 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfludis.2020.105766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Franken MC, de Sonneville-Koedoot C, Stolk E, Rietveld ACM, Bouwmans-Frijters C. Comparing a demands and capacities model approach and the Lidcombe program for pre-school stuttering children: the restart randomised trail. Procedia-Soc Behav Sci. 2015;193:287–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all individuals with Koolen-de Vries syndrome and their families who took part in this research study. Provided by National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Centre of Research Excellence in Speech and Language #1116976 (AM, DA).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MSJ: collected data, analysed data, interpreted data and wrote/edited manuscript. OvR, DAK and BBAdV: collected data, analysed data and edited manuscript. DJA and ATM: designed and conceptualised the study, interpreted data, directed the project and wrote/edited manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Angela T. Morgan.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

Ethical approval was obtained through the Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne, Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC #37353). Written informed consent was obtained from the participant or their parents/legal guardian in the case of minors or adults with intellectual disabilities.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

St John, M., van Reyk, O., Koolen, D.A. et al. Expanding the speech and language phenotype in Koolen-de Vries syndrome: late onset and periodic stuttering a novel feature. Eur J Hum Genet 31, 531–540 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-022-01230-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-022-01230-7

Search

Quick links