Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review Article
  • Published:

Association of sugar-sweetened beverages with the risk of colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

The association between sugar-sweetened beverages intake and colorectal cancer (CRC) remains controversial. A metaanalysis was performed to clarify the correlation between sugar-sweetened beverages and CRC risk/mortality. A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Sinomed (CBM), Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform, and China Science and Technology Journal VIP database. Articles were restricted to be available in any language until March 31, 2022. The highest exposed categories were used to calculate the pooled relative risks (RR) values. Pooled relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to estimate the association of sugar-sweetened beverages with CRC risk and mortality. Heterogeneity was assessed with the Cochran Q statistic and quantified with the I2 statistic. A total of 17 studies (6 case–control and 11 cohort) involving 557,391 subjects were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled RRs for CRC incidence and mortality among people taking sugar-sweetened beverages were 1.17 (95% CI: 1.07–1.28) and 1.13 (95% CI: 0.99–1.29), respectively. In subgroup analysis, a correlation was found in the distal colon with a pooled RR of 1.41 (95% CI: 1.10–1.80). There was no correlation in the proximal colon with a pooled RR of 1.58 (95% CI: 0.79–3.17). We found statistically significant associations between CRC incidence and sugar-sweetened beverages intake in North America and Oceania, with pooled RRs of 1.16 (95% CI: 1.00–1.33) and 1.32 (95% CI: 1.13–1.55), respectively. In sensitivity analysis, after excluding each study and calculating heterogeneity and effect sizes, there was still a correlation between sugar-sweetened beverages intake and CRC risk. This meta-analysis suggests that sugar-sweetened beverages intake may increase CRC risk, independent of CRC mortality. Whether CRC risk increases with increased sugar-sweetened beverage intake needs further investigation in the future.

This meta-analysis aimed to indicate the relationship between sugar-sweetened beverages intake and the risk and mortality of colorectal cancer. A total of 17 studies involving 557,391 subjects were included. The results showed that sugar-sweetened beverages may increase the risk of colorectal cancer but may not be associated with colorectal cancer mortality.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Flow diagram of the study search and selection process.
Fig. 2: Forest plot for sugar-sweetened beverages intake and CRC incidence [20,21,22,23,24, 31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39].
Fig. 3: Forest plot for sugar-sweetened beverages intake and CRC mortality [40,41,42].
Fig. 4
Fig. 5: For the sensitivity analysis graph of 14 studies [20,21,22,23,24, 31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39].
Fig. 6: Funnel plot of 14 studies.
Fig. 7
Fig. 8: Funnel plot of three studies.
Fig. 9

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article (and its Supplementary Information files).

References

  1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:209–249. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bray F, Laversanne M, Weiderpass E, Soerjomataram I. The ever-increasing importance of cancer as a leading cause of premature death worldwide. Cancer. 2021;127:3029–3030. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.33587.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Vernia F, Longo S, Stefanelli G, Viscido A, Latella G. Dietary factors modulating colorectal carcinogenesis. Nutrients. 2021;13. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13010143.

  4. Tiffon C. The impact of nutrition and environmental epigenetics on human health and disease. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19113425.

  5. Thanikachalam K, Khan G. Colorectal cancer and nutrition. Nutrients. 2019;11. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11010164.

  6. Cai S, Li Y, Ding Y, Chen K, Jin M. Alcohol drinking and the risk of colorectal cancer death: a meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2014;23:532–539. https://doi.org/10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000076.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Li Y, Guo L, He K, Huang C, Tang S. Consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages and fruit juice and human cancer: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of observational studies. J Cancer. 2021;12:3077–88. https://doi.org/10.7150/jca.51322.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Marriott BP, Hunt KJ, Malek AM, Newman JC. Trends in intake of energy and total sugar from sugar-sweetened beverages in the United States among children and adults, NHANES 2003-2016. Nutrients. 2019;11. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11092004.

  9. Min JE, Green DB, Kim L. Calories and sugars in boba milk tea: implications for obesity risk in Asian Pacific Islanders. Food Sci Nutr. 2017;5:38–45. https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.362.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ong A, Prasetyo YT, Libiran M, Lontoc Y, Lunaria J, Manalo AM, et al. Consumer preference analysis on attributes of milk tea: a conjoint analysis approach. Foods. 2021;10. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10061382.

  11. Te ML, Mallard S, Mann J. Dietary sugars and body weight: systematic review and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials and cohort studies. BMJ. 2012;346:e7492. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e7492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Malik VS, Pan A, Willett WC, Hu FB. Sugar-sweetened beverages and weight gain in children and adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013;98:1084–102. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.113.058362.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Imamura F, O’Connor L, Ye Z, Mursu J, Hayashino Y, Bhupathiraju SN, et al. Consumption of sugar sweetened beverages, artificially sweetened beverages, and fruit juice and incidence of type 2 diabetes: systematic review, meta-analysis, and estimation of population attributable fraction. BMJ. 2015;351:h3576. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h3576.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Malik VS, Popkin BM, Bray GA, Després JP, Willett WC, Hu FB. Sugar-sweetened beverages and risk of metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis. Diabetes Care. 2010;33:2477–83. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc10-1079.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Bernabé E, Vehkalahti MM, Sheiham A, Aromaa A, Suominen AL. Sugar-sweetened beverages and dental caries in adults: a 4-year prospective study. J Dent. 2014;42:952–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2014.04.011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mozaffarian D. Dietary and policy priorities for cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and obesity: a comprehensive review. Circulation. 2016;133:187–225. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.018585.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Lauby-Secretan B, Scoccianti C, Loomis D, Grosse Y, Bianchini F, Straif K. Body fatness and cancer-viewpoint of the IARC working group. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:794–8. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsr1606602.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Murphy N, Jenab M, Gunter MJ. Adiposity and gastrointestinal cancers: epidemiology, mechanisms and future directions. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;15:659–70. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41575-018-0038-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Llaha F, Gil-Lespinard M, Unal P, de Villasante I, Castañeda J, Zamora-Ros R. Consumption of sweet beverages and cancer risk. A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Nutrients. 2021;13. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13020516.

  20. Hur J, Otegbeye E, Joh HK, Nimptsch K, Ng K, Ogino S, et al. Sugar-sweetened beverage intake in adulthood and adolescence and risk of early-onset colorectal cancer among women. Gut. 2021;70:2330–6. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2020-323450.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Leung CY, Abe SK, Sawada N, Ishihara J, Takachi R, Yamaji T, et al. Sugary drink consumption and subsequent colorectal cancer risk: the Japan Public Health Center-Based Prospective Cohort Study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2021;30:782–8. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-20-1364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Arthur RS, Kirsh VA, Mossavar-Rahmani Y, Xue X, Rohan TE. Sugar-containing beverages and their association with risk of breast, endometrial, ovarian and colorectal cancers among Canadian women. Cancer Epidemiol. 2021;70:101855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canep.2020.101855.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Chang VC, Cotterchio M, De P, Tinmouth J. Risk factors for early-onset colorectal cancer: a population-based case-control study in Ontario, Canada. Cancer Causes Control. 2021;32:1063–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-021-01456-8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Gavrilas LI, Ionescu C, Balacescu O, Revnic C, Ciobarca D, Filip L, et al. Foods and food groups associated with colorectal cancer: a case-control study. Farmacia. 2018;66:846–52. https://doi.org/10.31925/farmacia.2018.5.15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6:e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Stang A. Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol. 2010;25:603–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-010-9491-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Zeng XRENX. Meta-analysis of dose-response studies. Meta-analysis was performed using Stata (in Chinese). 2017:231–65.

  28. Zhang J, Yu KF. What’s the relative risk? A method of correcting the odds ratio in cohort studies of common outcomes. JAMA. 1998;280:1690–1. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.280.19.1690.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327:557–60. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Haidich AB. Meta-analysis in medical research. Hippokratia. 2010;14:29–37.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Chazelas E, Srour B, Desmetz E, Kesse-Guyot E, Julia C, Deschamps V, et al. Sugary drink consumption and risk of cancer: results from NutriNet-Santé prospective cohort. BMJ. 2019;366:l2408. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l2408.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Pacheco LS, Anderson C, Lacey JJ, Giovannucci EL, Lemus H, Araneta M, et al. Sugar-sweetened beverages and colorectal cancer risk in the California Teachers Study. PLoS ONE. 2019;14:e223638. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223638.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Makarem N, Bandera EV, Lin Y, Jacques PF, Hayes RB, Parekh N. Consumption of sugars, sugary foods, and sugary beverages in relation to adiposity-related cancer risk in the Framingham Offspring Cohort (1991-2013). Cancer Prev Res. 2018;11:347–58. https://doi.org/10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-17-0218.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Hodge AM, Bassett JK, Milne RL, English DR, Giles GG. Consumption of sugar-sweetened and artificially sweetened soft drinks and risk of obesity-related cancers. Public Health Nutr. 2018;21:1618–26. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980017002555.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Theodoratou E, Farrington SM, Tenesa A, Mcneill G, Cetnarskyj R, Korakakis E, et al. Associations between dietary and lifestyle risk factors and colorectal cancer in the Scottish population. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2014;23:8–17. https://doi.org/10.1097/CEJ.0b013e3283639fb8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Mahfouz EM, Sadek RR, Abdel-Latief WM, Mosallem FA, Hassan EE. The role of dietary and lifestyle factors in the development of colorectal cancer: case control study in Minia, Egypt. Cent Eur J Public Health. 2014;22:215–22. https://doi.org/10.21101/cejph.a3919.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Annema N, Heyworth JS, Mcnaughton SA, Iacopetta B, Fritschi L. Fruit and vegetable consumption and the risk of proximal colon, distal colon, and rectal cancers in a case-control study in Western Australia. J Am Diet Assoc. 2011;111:1479–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jada.2011.07.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Fung TT, Hu FB, Wu K, Chiuve SE, Fuchs CS, Giovannucci E. The Mediterranean and Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diets and colorectal cancer. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010;92:1429–35. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.2010.29242.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Bener A, Moore MA, Ali R, El AH. Impacts of family history and lifestyle habits on colorectal cancer risk: a case-control study in Qatar. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2010;11:963–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Fung TT, Kashambwa R, Sato K, Chiuve SE, Fuchs CS, Wu K, et al. Post diagnosis diet quality and colorectal cancer survival in women. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e115377. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115377.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Khan MM, Goto R, Kobayashi K, Suzumura S, Nagata Y, Sonoda T, et al. Dietary habits and cancer mortality among middle aged and older Japanese living in hokkaido, Japan by cancer site and sex. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2004;5:58–65.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Mullee A, Romaguera D, Pearson-Stuttard J, Viallon V, Stepien M, Freisling H, et al. Association between soft drink consumption and mortality in 10 European countries. JAMA Intern Med. 2019;179:1479–90. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.2478.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Schwingshackl L, Schwedhelm C, Hoffmann G, Knüppel S, Laure PA, Iqbal K, et al. Food groups and risk of colorectal cancer. Int J Cancer. 2018;142:1748–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.31198.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Zhang X, Albanes D, Beeson WL, van den Brandt PA, Buring JE, Flood A, et al. Risk of colon cancer and coffee, tea, and sugar-sweetened soft drink intake: pooled analysis of prospective cohort studies. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010;102:771–83. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djq107.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Augustin L, Kendall C, Jenkins D, Willett WC, Astrup A, Barclay AW, et al. Glycemic index, glycemic load and glycemic response: an International Scientific Consensus Summit from the International Carbohydrate Quality Consortium (ICQC). Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2015;25:795–815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.numecd.2015.05.005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Avgerinos KI, Spyrou N, Mantzoros CS, Dalamaga M. Obesity and cancer risk: emerging biological mechanisms and perspectives. Metabolism. 2019;92:121–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metabol.2018.11.001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Roberts DL, Dive C, Renehan AG. Biological mechanisms linking obesity and cancer risk: new perspectives. Annu Rev Med. 2010;61:301–16. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.med.080708.082713.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Nardin T, Barnaba C, Abballe F, Trenti G, Malacarne M, Larcher R. Fast analysis of quaternary ammonium pesticides in food and beverages using cation-exchange chromatography coupled with isotope-dilution high-resolution mass spectrometry. J Sep Sci. 2017;40:3928–37. https://doi.org/10.1002/jssc.201700579.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Tasevska N, Park Y, Jiao L, Hollenbeck A, Subar AF, Potischman N. Sugars and risk of mortality in the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2014;99:1077–88. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.113.069369.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Stanhope KL. Role of fructose-containing sugars in the epidemics of obesity and metabolic syndrome. Annu Rev Med. 2012;63:329–43. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-med-042010-113026.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Jang C, Hui S, Lu W, Cowan AJ, Morscher RJ, Lee G, et al. The small intestine converts dietary fructose into glucose and organic acids. Cell Metab. 2018;27:351–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2017.12.016.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Zhao S, Jang C, Liu J, Uehara K, Gilbert M, Izzo L, et al. Dietary fructose feeds hepatic lipogenesis via microbiota-derived acetate. Nature. 2020;579:586–91. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2101-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Goncalves MD, Lu C, Tutnauer J, Hartman TE, Hwang SK, Murphy CJ, et al. High-fructose corn syrup enhances intestinal tumor growth in mice. Science. 2019;363:1345–9. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat8515.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Popkin BM, Hawkes C. Sweetening of the global diet, particularly beverages: patterns, trends, and policy responses. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016;4:174–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(15)00419-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Flood DM, Weiss NS, Cook LS, Emerson JC, Schwartz SM, Potter JD. Colorectal cancer incidence in Asian migrants to the United States and their descendants. Cancer Causes Control. 2000;11:403–11. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1008955722425.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Donaldson GP, Lee SM, Mazmanian SK. Gut biogeography of the bacterial microbiota. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2016;14:20–32. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro3552.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Wong SH, Yu J. Gut microbiota in colorectal cancer: mechanisms of action and clinical applications. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;16:690–704. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41575-019-0209-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. le Clercq CMC, Bouwens MWE, Rondagh EJA, Bakker CM, Keulen ETP, de Ridder RJ, et al. Postcolonoscopy colorectal cancers are preventable: a population-based study. Gut. 2014;63:957–63. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2013-304880.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Yuan C, Spiegelman D, Rimm EB, Rosner BA, Stampfer MJ, Barnett JB, et al. Relative validity of nutrient intakes assessed by questionnaire, 24-hour recalls, and diet records as compared with urinary recovery and plasma concentration biomarkers: findings for women. Am J Epidemiol. 2018;187:1051–63. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwx328.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

LF, JG, and WX: study conceptualization, study design, methodology, investigation, data acquisition, data curation, writing—original draft, writing—reviewing and editing, visualization. YL and VY: investigation, writing—reviewing and editing. SM: visualization, advising, revisions. SL, RB, ZZ, PD, CC, YW, and QZ: advising, writing—review and editing. KW, HL, BW, and PX: writing—review and editing. CS: study conceptualization, study design, validation, supervision, investigation, writing—review and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chenyu Sun.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethical approval

All human and animal studies have been approved by the appropriate ethics committee.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Feng, L., Gao, J., Xia, W. et al. Association of sugar-sweetened beverages with the risk of colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Clin Nutr 77, 941–952 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41430-023-01302-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41430-023-01302-x

Search

Quick links