Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Body composition, energy expenditure, and physical activity

Validity of quantitative ultrasound and bioelectrical impedance analysis for measuring bone density and body composition in children

Abstract

Background/objectives

Using dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) to assess body composition in children has limitations including expense, lack of portability, and exposure to radiation. The aims of this study were to examine: (1) validity of quantitative ultrasound (QUS) against DXA for measuring bone density and (2) the validity of in-built algorithm of bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) for measuring body composition in children (8–13 years) living in New Zealand.

Subjects/methods

Total body less head (TBLH), bone mineral content (BMC), bone mineral density (BMD), and body composition were measured with DXA (QDR Discovery A, Hologic, USA); calcaneal BMD and stiffness index (SI) with QUS (Sahara QUS, Hologic, USA), and BIA on the InBody 230 (Biospace Ltd., Seoul, Korea). Relative validity was assessed using Pearson’s and Lin’s concordance correlation coefficients (CCC), and Bland–Altman plots.

Results

In 124 healthy children, positive correlations between QUS SI and DXA (BMC and BMD) were observed (range = 0.30–0.45, P < 0.01). Results from Lin’s CCC test showed almost perfect correlations between BIA and DXA fat free mass (0.96), fat mass (0.92), and substantial correlation for percentage of fat mass (0.75) (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Although BIA results were not as accurate as DXA and DXA remains the gold standard method for clinical assessment, BIA can be an alternative method for investigating body composition among children in large cohort field studies. Calcaneal QUS and DXA are not interchangeable methods for measuring bone density in children similar to our study population.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Bland–Altman plots demonstrating agreement between DXA and BIA FFM measurements (total population).

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Specker BL, Schoenau E. Quantitative bone analysis in children: current methods and recommendations. J Pediatr. 2005;146:726–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Binkley TL, Berry R, Specker BL. Methods for measurement of pediatric bone. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2008;9:95–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ellis KJ, Shypailo RJ, Pratt JA, Pond WG. Accuracy of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for body-composition measurements in children. Am J Clin Nutr. 1994;60:660–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Binkovitz LA, Henwood MJ. Pediatric DXA: technique and interpretation. Pediatr Radiol. 2007;37:21–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Genant HK, Engelke K, Fuerst T, Gluer CC, Grampp S, Harris ST, et al. Noninvasive assessment of bone mineral and structure: state of the art. J Bone Min Res. 1996;11:707–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kaufman JJ, Einhorn TA. Ultrasound assessment of bone. J Bone Min Res. 1993;8:517–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Baroncelli GI. Quantitative ultrasound methods to assess bone mineral status in children: technical characteristics, performance, and clinical application. Pediatr Res. 2008;63:220–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Houtkooper LB, Lohman TG, Going SB, Hall MC. Validity of bioelectric impedance for body composition assessment in children. J Appl Physiol. 1989;66:814–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. von Hurst PR, Walsh DCI, Conlon CA, Ingram M, Kruger R, Stonehouse W. Validity and reliability of bioelectrical impedance analysis to estimate body fat percentage against air displacement plethysmography and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Nutr Diet. 2015;73:197–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Huang AC, Chen YY, Chuang CL, Chiang LM, Lu HK, Lin HC, et al. Cross-mode bioelectrical impedance analysis in a standing position for estimating fat-free mass validated against dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Nutr Res. 2015;35:982–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Okasora K, Takaya R, Tokuda M, Fukunaga Y, Oguni T, Tanaka H, et al. Comparison of bioelectrical impedance analysis and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry for assessment of body composition in children. Pediatr Int. 1999;41:121–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Fors H, Gelander L, Bjarnason R, Albertsson-Wikland K, Bosaeus I. Body composition, as assessed by bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, in a healthy paediatric population. Acta Paediatr. 2002;91:755–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gutin B, Litaker M, Islam S, Manos T, Smith C, Treiber F. Body-composition measurement in 9-11-y-old children by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, skinfold-thickness measurements, and bioimpedance analysis. Am J Clin Nutr. 1996;63:287–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Noradilah MJ, Ang YN, Kamaruddin NA, Deurenberg P, Ismail MN, Poh BK. Assessing body fat of children by skinfold thickness, bioelectrical impedance analysis, and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: a validation study among Malay children aged 7 to 11 years. Asia Pac J Public Health 2016;28(Suppl 5):74S–84S.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Eisenmann JC, Heelan KA, Welk GJ. Assessing body composition among 3- to 8-year-old children: anthropometry, BIA, and DXA. Obes Res. 2004;12:1633–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Elberg J, McDuffie JR, Sebring NG, Salaita C, Keil M, Robotham D, et al. Comparison of methods to assess change in children’s body composition. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004;80:64–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee LW, Liao YS, Lu HK, Hsiao PL, Chen YY, Chi CC, et al. Validation of two portable bioelectrical impedance analyses for the assessment of body composition in school age children. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0171568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kriemler S, Puder J, Zahner L, Roth R, Braun-Fahrlander C, Bedogni G. Cross-validation of bioelectrical impedance analysis for the assessment of body composition in a representative sample of 6- to 13-year-old children. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2009;63:619–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang AG. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2009;41:1149–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cole TJ, Flegal KM, Nicholls D, Jackson AA. Body mass index cut offs to define thinness in children and adolescents: international survey. BMJ. 2007;335:194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Cole TJ, Bellizzi MC, Flegal KM, Dietz WH. Establishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: international survey. BMJ. 2000;320:1240–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Crabtree NJ, Arabi A, Bachrach LK, Fewtrell M, El-Hajj Fuleihan G, Kecskemethy HH, et al. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry interpretation and reporting in children and adolescents: the revised 2013 ISCD Pediatric Official Positions. J Clin Densitom. 2014;17:225–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Krieg MA, Barkmann R, Gonnelli S, Stewart A, Bauer DC, Del Rio Barquero L, et al. Quantitative ultrasound in the management of osteoporosis: the 2007 ISCD official positions. J Clin Densitom. 2008;11:163–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lin LI. A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics. 1989;45:255–68.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Lin LI. A note on the concordance correlation coefficient. Biometrics. 2000;56:324–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Waern RV, Cumming R, Travison T, Blyth F, Naganathan V, Allman-Farinelli M, et al. Relative validity of a diet history questionnaire against a four-day weighed food record among older men in Australia: the concord health and ageing in men project (CHAMP). J Nutr Health Aging. 2015;19:603–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Chong KH, Poh BK, Jamil NA, Kamaruddin NA, Deurenberg P. Radial quantitative ultrasound and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: intermethod agreement for bone status assessment in children. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:232876.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Srichan W, Thasanasuwan W, Kijboonchoo K, Rojroongwasinkul N, Wimonpeerapattana W, Khouw I, et al. Bone status measured by quantitative ultrasound: a comparison with DXA in Thai children. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2016;70:894–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Lum CK, Wang MC, Moore E, Wilson DM, Marcus R, Bachrach LK. A comparison of calcaneus ultrasound and dual X-ray absorptiometry in healthy North American youths and young adults. J Clin Densitom. 1999;2:403–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Mughal MZ, Langton CM, Utretch G, Morrison J, Specker BL. Comparison between broad-band ultrasound attenuation of the calcaneum and total body bone mineral density in children. Acta Paediatr. 1996;85:663–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Sioen I, Goemare S, Ahrens W, De Henauw S, De Vriendt T, Kaufman JM, et al. The relationship between paediatric calcaneal quantitative ultrasound measurements and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and DXA with laser (DXL) as well as body composition. Int J Obes. 2011;35(Suppl 1):125S–30S.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Xu Y, Guo B, Gong J, Xu H, Bai Z. The correlation between calcaneus stiffness index calculated by QUS and total body BMD assessed by DXA in Chinese children and adolescents. J Bone Min Metab. 2014;32:159–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Weeks BK, Hirsch R, Nogueira RC, Beck BR. Is calcaneal broadband ultrasound attenuation a valid index of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry-derived bone mass in children? Bone Jt Res. 2016;5:538–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Sundberg M, Gardsell P, Johnell O, Ornstein E, Sernbo I. Comparison of quantitative ultrasound measurements in calcaneus with DXA and SXA at other skeletal sites: a population-based study on 280 children aged 11-16 years. Osteoporos Int. 1998;8:410–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Wang KC, Wang KC, Amirabadi A, Cheung E, Uleryk E, Moineddin R, et al. Evidence-based outcomes on diagnostic accuracy of quantitative ultrasound for assessment of pediatric osteoporosis—a systematic review. Pediatr Radiol. 2014;44:1573–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Thomsen K, Jepsen DB, Matzen L, Hermann AP, Masud T, Ryg J. Is calcaneal quantitative ultrasound useful as a prescreen stratification tool for osteoporosis? Osteoporos Int. 2015;26:1459–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Houtkooper LB, Lohman TG, Going SB, Howell WH. Why bioelectrical impedance analysis should be used for estimating adiposity. Am J Clin Nutr. 1996;64(3 Suppl):436S–448S.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Sakata S, Kushida K, Yamazaki K, Inoue T. Ultrasound bone densitometry of os calcis in elderly Japanese women with hip fracture. Calcif Tissue Int. 1997;60:2–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to sincerely thank all participants in this study for their time and commitment to the research.

Funding

The study was funded by the Massey University Research Fund.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to data collection. MD was responsible for checking, entering, and analysing the data and drafted the paper. PRvH was responsible for study design, acquisition of funding and obtaining ethical approval. CAC, KLB, and MCK advised on the statistical analysis. All authors were involved in data interpretation, critical revisions of the paper and read and approved the final paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pamela R. von Hurst.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Delshad, M., Beck, K.L., Conlon, C.A. et al. Validity of quantitative ultrasound and bioelectrical impedance analysis for measuring bone density and body composition in children. Eur J Clin Nutr 75, 66–72 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41430-020-00711-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41430-020-00711-6

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links