Introduction

Viscoelastic liquids, including entangled polymer solutions, suspensions, and emulsions, exhibit intermediate properties between elasticity and viscosity, such as time-dependent mechanical characteristics. As the mechanical properties of these compounds and soft tissues are similar, these compounds are used for biomaterial applications within the human body, including mucous membrane protuberance agents, filler materials for cosmetic surgery, and surgical aids [1,2,3,4,5]. Natural polymer solutions are commercially manufactured for this purpose; one example is sodium hyaluronate, an entangled polymer solution. Inside the body, these biomaterials undergo chemical and biological degradation processes, including hydrolysis and enzymatic reactions. Therefore, it is necessary to examine how biomaterial degradation impacts viscoelasticity. However, this task remains challenging because degradation stochastically causes the scission of main chains, leading to a broader molecular weight distribution and disentanglement; as a result, qualitative predictions of viscoelastic properties are hindered [6,7,8,9,10].

To overcome the difficulties related to controlling viscoelasticity over time, we developed tetra-armed polyethylene glycol (Tetra-PEG) slime, a model viscoelastic liquid system with a regular network structure [11, 12]. Tetra-PEG slime is formed by coupling phenylboronic acid-terminated PEG (tetra-PEG–FPBA) with glucono-delta-lactone-terminated PEG (tetra-PEG–GDL) through reversible boronic ester bonds, which produce transient reconfigurable networks; these networks are generally characterized by static and dynamic heterogeneities. Static heterogeneities include structural defects, such as dangling chains, loop structures, and branch number distributions [13,14,15,16], whereas dynamic heterogeneities represent mixed components with slow and fast dynamics, such as micelles, unimers, and low-molecular-weight crosslinkers. The heterogeneities of transient networks increases the difficulty in elucidating molecular processes that occur during viscoelastic relaxation. In contrast, Tetra-PEG slimes synthesized from symmetric four-armed precursors with a narrow distribution minimize the number of structural heterogeneities.

These methods are advantageous because the network structure and viscoelastic properties are directly correlated, which enables highly controllable and predictable material characteristics. Tetra-PEG slime exhibits single relaxation modes with distinct relaxation times, and these times are uniquely determined by network parameters, such as the polymer concentration, network strand length, and network connectivity [17, 18].

The aim of this study was to construct a predictable model for describing the long-term viscoelastic properties of transient networks. For this purpose, Tetra-PEG slimes were modified to integrate specific cleavage sites within the glucoamide groups of tetra-PEG–GDL units, which undergo hydrolysis to gluconolactone in aqueous solution [18]. We accurately measured the degradation rates of glucoamide in the prepared Tetra-PEG slime and aqueous solution and investigated the degradation mechanism (Fig. 1). The findings of this work can facilitate the design of biomaterials that must maintain viscoelastic properties over long periods for internal body applications.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Schematic illustration showing the degradation of Tetra-PEG slime via the cleavage of specific units

Experimental

Tetra-PEG–FPBA and tetra-PEG–GDL (Mw = 4.0 × 104 g mol−1) were purchased from Xiamen Sinopeg Biotech Co., Ltd. (China). Tetra-PEG slimes were prepared by mixing equal amounts of tetra-PEG–FPBA and tetra-PEG–GDL, which were dissolved in a phosphate buffer solution (pH = 8.0, 200 mM). The polymer concentration (cPEG) was maintained at 20, 40, or 90 g L−1 over 24 h. For comparison, we also prepared a tetra-PEG–GDL solution in the aforementioned phosphate buffer. To ensure that the samples remained undisturbed at specific temperatures (T = 30, 40, and 50 °C), the thermal environment was precisely regulated through a thermostatic chamber (NCB 1210B; Eyela).

To measure the dynamic viscoelasticity of the fabricated slimes, a stress-controlled rheometer (MCR302; Anton Paar, Graz, Austria) equipped with a cone-plate fixture (diameter: 25 mm, cone angle: 4°) was utilized. The angular frequency dependences (0.1–100 rad s–1) of the storage (G′) and loss (G″) moduli were established at 25 °C. Before the measurements, the oscillatory shear strain amplitudes were confirmed to be within the linear viscoelasticity range.

Results and discussion

The loss and storage moduli of Tetra-PEG slime (PEG concentration (cPEG) = 40 g·L−1) depended on the angular frequency, which underwent time-dependent changes, as shown in Fig. 2. With increasing incubation time, the absolute values of G′ and G″ decreased, and the terminal relaxation process accelerated. The observed decrease was more pronounced at higher temperatures. The dashed lines in the plots represent the fitting results obtained using the Maxwellian model, which is expressed as follows:

$${G}^{{\prime} }=\Delta G\frac{{\omega }^{2}{{\tau }_{{{{{{\rm{visco}}}}}}}}^{2}}{1+{\omega }^{2}{{\tau }_{{{{{{\rm{visco}}}}}}}}^{2}},$$
(1a)
$${G}^{{\prime} {\prime}}=\Delta G\frac{\omega {\tau }_{{{{{{\rm{visco}}}}}}}}{1+{\omega }^{2}{{\tau }_{{{{{{\rm{visco}}}}}}}}^{2}}.$$
(1b)
Fig. 2
figure 2

Angular frequency (ω) dependence of the storage (G′, top) and loss (G″, bottom) moduli of Tetra-PEG slime (cPEG = 40 g·L−1) incubated at various temperatures. The dashed lines represent the fitting results obtained using the Maxwellian model

Here, ΔG, ω, and τvisco are the plateau modulus, angular frequency, and viscoelastic relaxation time, respectively. The predictions of Eqs. (1a) and (1b) corresponded well with the experimental data, suggesting that the relaxation process, not the degree of degradation, was consistent. The experimental and theoretical values corresponded under all the experimental conditions, as shown in Section “Experimental” of the Supplementary Information. Notably, the deviation from the predicted value at higher frequencies was pronounced at longer degradation times, which was attributed to the Rouse modes of the dangling chains. The relaxation time is a “terminal relaxation time” and was estimated using the data at the low-frequency limit.

As the incubation time (t) increased, the terminal relaxation time (τvisco) decreased, indicating a reduction in network connectivity (p) [18]. According to our previous study [18], the relationship between τvisco and p follows a power law. To evaluate the change in p due to degradation, the relationship between τvisco and p was determined for Tetra-PEG slime with controlled network connectivity, which was produced by mixing two polymer solutions at various stoichiometric proportions (s). p can be estimated from the ratio of the FPBA concentration to the GDL concentration using the following equation:

$$p= \left\{1+\frac{1}{\left({\left[{{{{{\rm{FPBA}}}}}}\right]}_{\,0}+{\left[{{{{{\rm{GDL}}}}}}\right]}_{\,0}\right){K}_{{{{{\rm{eq}}}}}}}\right\} \\ -{\left[{\left(1+\frac{1}{\left({\left[{{{{{\rm{FPBA}}}}}}\right]}_{\,0}+{\left[{{{{{\rm{GDL}}}}}}\right]}_{\,0}\right){K}_{{{{{\rm{eq}}}}}}}\right)}^{2}-1\right]}^{1/2},$$
(2)

where [X]0 represents the initial molar concentration of Compound X (FPBA or GDL) and Keq is the equilibrium constant of boronic ester (Keq = 5.67 × 102 at pH = 8.0 and 25 °C and Keq = 6.08 × 102 at pH = 8.0 and 30 °C) [12]. Figure 3 shows the relationship between τvisco and p, which was determined for various polymer concentrations. The obtained relationships follow the power law τvisco = ApB. Using these curves, we experimentally determined p from the viscoelasticity.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Relationship between terminal relaxation time (τvisco) and p (cPEG = 20 (black), 40 (red), and 90 (blue) g L−1; Mw = 40 kg mol−1). The dashed lines represent the power law fitting results

The top panel of Fig. 4 shows the time evolution of τvisco for Tetra-PEG slime incubated with different PEG concentrations at 30 °C. With the p value estimated from τvisco, the fraction of remaining glucoamide in slime (Rslime), which is the ratio of the molar concentration of glucoamide groups to that in the initial state, can be quantitatively estimated via the following formula:

$${R}_{{{{{\rm{slime}}}}}}=\frac{4{K}_{{{{{\rm{eq}}}}}}-2p+\sqrt{{\left(4{K}_{{{{{\rm{eq}}}}}}{N}_{{{{{\rm{end}}}}}}-2p\right)}^{2}+16{{K}^{2}}_{{{{{\rm{eq}}}}}}{{N}^{2}}_{{{{{\rm{end}}}}}}\left({p}^{2}-2p\right)}}{2{K}_{{{{{\rm{eq}}}}}}{N}_{{{{{\rm{end}}}}}}\left({p}^{2}-2p\right)}-1$$
(3)

where Nend represents the molar concentration of all end groups of tetra-PEG–FPBA and tetra-PEG–GDL and Keq denotes the equilibrium constant for the reaction involving boronic ester bonds. The bottom panel of Fig. 4 shows that Rslime consistently decreased during incubation, while the degradation rate increased with decreasing polymer concentration. On a semilogarithmic plot, the linear relationships became more evident, particularly over shorter time spans. Assuming that the degradation reaction involved pseudo-first-order kinetics, the apparent degradation rate constant for the glucoamide cleavage reaction (kdeg,app) was estimated at each temperature using the following fitting function:

$${R}_{{{{{\rm{slime}}}}}}=\exp \left(-{k}_{{{{{\rm{deg,app}}}}}}\;\;t\right).$$
(4)
Fig. 4
figure 4

Terminal relaxation time (τvisco) and Rslime plotted as functions of the incubation time (t) at various polymer concentrations and 30 °C. The dashed lines represent the fitting curves assuming a first-order reaction

Figure 5 shows the estimated kdeg, app plotted as a function of the inverse absolute temperature (T−1). The degradation data generated for the tetra-PEG–GDL precursor solution obtained via high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) are also presented; details are provided in Section “Introduction” of the Supplementary Information. As T−1 increased, kdeg,app linearly decreased according to the semilogarithmic plot, indicating that the reaction followed an Arrhenius-type activation process described by the following equation:

$${k}_{{{{{\rm{deg }}}}},{{\mbox{app}}}}=A\,\exp \left(-\frac{{E}_{{{\mbox{a}}}}}{{RT}}\right),$$
(5)

where A and Ea represent the frequency and activation energy of the degradation reaction, respectively. R is the gas constant, and T is the temperature. The dashed lines in Fig. 5 are the fitting lines obtained using Eq. (5). The slopes of these lines are consistent across the solution and network states at different polymer concentrations, suggesting that the hydrolysis of amide bonds in Tetra-PEG slime changes the viscoelasticity of the material. Moreover, the absolute values were more than ten times lower in the network state than in the solution state, and their difference increased with increasing PEG concentration. These results indicate that the formation of boronic ester bonds reduces the frequency of glucoamide cleavage.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Apparent degradation rate constant of the cleavage reaction plotted as a function of the inverse temperature (T−1). The circles and squares represent the data obtained for the tetra-PEG–GDL solution and Tetra-PEG slime, respectively. The dashed lines represent the fitting lines obtained using the Arrhenius equation

To elucidate the mechanism by which boronic ester bonds inhibit glucoamide degradation, a process that combines the reversible reaction between tetra-PEG–FPBA and tetra–PEG–GDL and hydrolysis of tetra-PEG–GDL should be considered. In the equilibrium state, glucoamide, which contains amide bonds at its termini, exhibits two different conformations, one with minor cyclic structures and one with major linear structures. According to a previous study [19], the cyclic conformation is preferentially hydrolyzed, leading to its cleavage. FPBA binding primarily involves the linear structure, which inhibits the formation of the cyclic conformation; as a result, the overall degradation rate decrease. Considering the reversible reaction of boronic ester bonds and hydrolysis of cyclic tetra-PEG–GDL, the kinetic equations for each reaction can be written as follows.

$$\frac{{{{{{\rm{d}}}}}}{N}_{{{{{\rm{GDL}}}}}}}{{{{{\rm{d}}}}}t}={k}_{{{{{\rm{a}}}}}}{N}_{{{{{\rm{FPBA}}}}}-{{{{\rm{GDL}}}}}}-{k}_{{{{{\rm{d}}}}}}{N}_{{{{{\rm{GDL}}}}}}{N}_{{{{{\rm{FPBA}}}}}}-{k}_{{{{{\rm{hyd}}}}}}{N}_{{{{{\rm{GDL}}}}}}.$$
(6)
$$\frac{{{{{{\rm{d}}}}}}{N}_{{{{{\rm{FPBA}}}}}-{{{{\rm{GDL}}}}}}}{{{{{\rm{d}}}}}t}=-{k}_{{{{{\rm{a}}}}}}{N}_{{{{{\rm{FPBA}}}}}-{{{{\rm{GDL}}}}}}+{k}_{{{{{\rm{d}}}}}}{N}_{{{{{\rm{GDL}}}}}}{N}_{{{{{\rm{FPBA}}}}}}.$$
(7)

Considering the law of mass conservation for each functional group, the following equation is obtained:

$${N}_{{{{{\rm{FPBA}}}}}-{{{{\rm{GDL}}}}}} +{N}_{{{{{\rm{GDL}}}}}}+{N}_{{{{{\rm{degraded}}}}}-{{{{\rm{GDL}}}}}}= \, {N}_{{{{{\rm{FPBA}}}}}-{{{{\rm{GDL}}}}}} \\ +{N}_{{{{{\rm{FPBA}}}}}}={C}_{0},$$
(8)

where NFPBA, NGDL, Ndegraded-GDL, and NFPBA-GDL are the end group concentrations of tetra-PEG–FPBA and tetra-PEG–GDL and the molar concentrations of the degraded gluconolactone and boronic ester bonds, respectively. ka (=3.5 × 105 d−1 mol−1 L at 30 °C) and kd (=5.8 × 102 d−1 at 30 °C) are the rate constants of the binding and dissociation processes measured via surface plasmon resonance in our previous study [12]. khyd (=0.129 d−1 at 30 °C) is the rate of glucosamine hydrolysis in tetra-PEG–GDL measured via HPLC.

According to Eqs. (6)–(8), NGDL and Rslime can be numerically derived as functions of t. By fitting the time dependence of the simulated Rslime via Eq. (4), a relationship between the theoretical kdeg,app and cPEG was obtained (see the solid line in Fig. 6; details of the fitting procedure are described in Section “Experimental” of the Supplementary Information). The predicted kdeg,app value decreased with increasing cPEG values and asymptotically approached the experimental curve at the low cPEG limit. Thus, the concentration dependence of kdeg,app qualitatively agreed with the experimental data represented by the squares. Compared to the experimental values, the theoretical values were approximately five times larger. Therefore, the numerical solution obtained at khyd = 0.3·khyd,HPLC is plotted as a dashed line in Fig. 6, which more accurately predicts the experimental results.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Comparison of the theoretical and experimental kdeg,app values. The solid line represents the numerical solution of Eqs. (6)–(8), and the rectangular symbols denote the experimental data obtained at 30 °C. The dashed line represents the numerical solution obtained at khyd = 0.3khyd,HPLC

The apparent delay of the hydrolysis process indicates that the binding between boronic acid and “cyclic” glucoamide suppresses the hydrolysis reaction, as shown in Fig. 7. Although the corresponding constant is lower than that of binding reactions between boronic acid and linear glucoamide, boronic acid in the tetravalent state easily binds to sugars, such as glucose and ribose, which are widely utilized in glucose sensors [20,21,22,23,24,25]. The reaction between the hydroxyl group of cyclic glucoamide and boronic acid prevents an amino group from forming, further delaying the cleavage reaction.

Fig. 7
figure 7

A schematic of the equilibrium reactions between tetra-PEG–FPBA and tetra-PEG–GDL

Conclusion

In summary, we explored the time-dependent nature of the viscoelastic properties of Tetra-PEG slime as a model transient network. We found that the viscoelastic behavior of Tetra-PEG slime corresponds with a Maxwellian model that is characterized by a single relaxation mode independent from the degree of degradation. As the incubation time increased, the terminal relaxation time decreased, which was primarily attributed to the hydrolysis of glucoamide groups. However, compared to that in aqueous solution, the degradation rate of these groups in Tetra-PEG slime was more than ten times lower, which was influenced by the concentration of reactive groups. The obtained results imply the hydrolysis of glucoamide groups is inhibited when the groups bind to phenylboronic acid in linear and cyclic states. This study suggested that Tetra-PEG slimes can be used as biomaterials to control viscoelasticity in the long-term by tuning the degradation of associative points.