Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Thermoenhanced osmotic power generator via lithium bromide and asymmetric sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone)/poly(ether sulfone) nanofluidic membrane

Abstract

Osmotic energy, existing between solutions with different concentrations, is a sustainable and ecofriendly resource for solving energy issues. However, current membrane-based osmotic energy conversion technologies focus on electricity generation from an “open” system by directly mixing salt (NaCl) solutions at room temperature. For the integrated utilization of thermal energy and higher power output performance, we demonstrate thermoenhanced osmotic energy conversion by employing highly soluble lithium bromide (LiBr) solutions, asymmetric sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone)/poly(ether sulfone) (SPEEK/PES) membranes, and LiMn2O4/carbon nanotube (LMO/CNT) electrodes. The thin top layer of this heat-resistant membrane contains hydrophilic groups (i.e., the sulfonated groups in SPEEK) that are beneficial for ion-selective transport. The thermal effect on each solution is investigated, and osmotic energy conversion can be improved by regulating the heat gradient. The power density is ~16.50 W/m2 by coupling with a temperature gradient (30 °C). This work is a step forward for promoting the performance of osmotic energy conversion with thermal energy assistance and provides the basis for a closed-loop system with regenerated osmotic energy from other energy forms. Moreover, the external field-osmotic hybrid energy conversion system shows powerful potential in the energy harvesting field.

Introduction

Salinity gradient energy is identified as a promising and abundant source of sustainable energy, which is obtained from the ionic gradient between sea water and fresh water1,2. Since Pattle’s pioneering research on salinity gradient energy in 19543, several techniques have been developed to maximize the conversion of salinity gradient energy into electricity. One of the most promising methods among these techniques is membrane-based reverse electrodialysis (RED), which utilizes an ion-selective membrane to directly generate electricity through ion migration without mechanical components4,5,6. The ions selectively transit through the membrane to induce a diffusive voltage between the membrane7, which is largely affected by the temperature distribution of the system8. In recent decades, synthetic polymeric membranes have become the core component in a wide variety of domains, including liquid and gas separation9, ultrafiltration10, and energy generation/storage11,12. Recently, nanofluidic membranes have been used in RED systems to achieve high power density13,14. In addition, solutions with different salinities are also natural reservoirs, which can be used as an intermediate for generating electricity from other energy conversion methods. By employing a nanofluidic RED membrane, the energy resources can be connected together with proper system designs.

Osmotic energy conversion using RED technology is largely affected by several factors, including the (1) salt solubility in water, (2) equivalent conductivity of the aqueous solution, (3) activity coefficient ratio, and (4) external field factors (e.g., thermal energy)15,16,17. In this respect, LiBr fits the requests as an RED working solution due to its excellent solubility (i.e., 13.13 M at 25 °C), which is much higher than that of NaCl (i.e., 5.50 M at 25 °C). Thus, the use of LiBr leads to a higher concentration gradient in the RED system, which results in a higher output power density. Moreover, some factors, such as the thermal field, can significantly affect the osmotic conversion performance. A temperature gradient is present between the high- and low-concentration solutions during the membrane distillation (MD) process, which utilizes low-grade heat (e.g., solar energy, geothermal energy, or waste heat) in the regeneration process of closed-loop RED. This is because MD utilizes a thermal field to promote the transport of vapor in the hydrophobic membrane. Thus, it is a sustainable method to regenerate high- and low-concentration LiBr solutions, which is similar to the regeneration of rivers from the evaporation of sea water. The temperatures of the two compartments are different, which means that the thermal-field effect exists across the membrane. However, the current research using RED technology to generate electricity from artificial NaCl–water solutions or natural rivers and sea water is typically near room temperature, which largely reduces its application field.

Herein, the feasibility of electricity generation via a LiBr solution and heat gradient is validated experimentally in an RED system. An osmotic power generator for electricity generation is built, which converts the osmotic energy existing in LiBr solutions with different concentrations and temperatures (Fig. 1a, i). This RED system is composed of an asymmetric sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone)/poly(ether sulfone) (SPEEK/PES) blend membrane and a pair of LiMn2O4/carbon nanotube (LMO/CNT) electrodes. The high thermal stability and low cost of the membrane are important for practical applications. The SPEEK/PES blend membrane shows a typical asymmetric finger-like structure with an average thickness of ~37 μm (Fig. 1a, ii). The ion selective layer of the membrane is the thin top layer whose thickness is ~1.1 μm (Fig. 1a, iii). The thin top layer contains hydrophilic groups (i.e., the sulfonated groups in SPEEK) that are beneficial for ion selective transport in the membrane. Additionally, as a proof of concept, we combine the RED with a heat gradient, and the system can reach a very high power density of ~16.50 W/m2 with a 30 °C temperature gradient at a 50-fold concentration gradient (Fig. 1b). There is a heat gradient between the solutions in many practical applications, while reported RED systems rarely consider this issue. The current work offers a promising method for enhancing electricity conversion from the salinity gradient energy of LiBr solution with an applied heat gradient, indicating the prospect of the use of LiBr solution in RED.

Experimental section

Materials and chemicals

Poly(ether ether ketone) (PEEK, Sigma-Aldrich, Shanghai), polyether sulfone (PES, BASF, Shanghai) and N,N-dimethylacetamide (DMAc, Sigma-Aldrich, Shanghai) were utilized to fabricate membranes. Isopropanol (IPA, 99.7%) acquired from J&K Beijing was used for the posttreatment of the membranes. Lithium bromide (J&K Beijing) was used to determine the RED performance of the membranes. LiMn2O4 (LMO, Sigma-Aldrich, Shanghai), carbon nanotube (CNT, Aladdin, Shanghai), N-methyl pyrrolidone (NMP, Aladdin, Shanghai) and poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF, MTI, Shenzhen) were used to prepare the electrode composite material. Degassed Milli-Q water was produced by a Milli-Q ultrapure water system (Millipore, USA). All chemicals were used as received.

Synthesis of SPEEK

SPEEK was synthesized by sulfonating PEEK with concentrated sulfuric acid. Briefly, 5 g of PEEK and 75 mL of concentrated sulfuric acid (98 wt%) were added into a 250 mL three-necked flask and stirred for 3 h until the PEEK dissolved completely. Then, the homogeneous solution was heated with stirring at 60 °C for another 2.5 h. Finally, the solution was slowly dropped into a large amount of ice-cold Milli-Q water to precipitate the SPEEK. SPEEK was filtered and washed with Milli-Q water several times until the pH of the percolate was ~7.

Fabrication of asymmetric SPEEK/PES blend membranes

Asymmetric SPEEK/PES blend membranes were fabricated via nonsolvent-induced phase inversion assisted by a nonsolvent additive. First, a certain mass ratio of SPEEK and PES was mixed together and stirred in N,N-dimethylacetamide (DMAc) for 1.5 h at room temperature to form a homogeneous polymer solution. Then, 0.2 mL of Milli-Q water was added and stirred for 0.5 h at 70 °C. After removing the air bubbles, the polymer solution was cast onto a clean glass plate at room temperature and below 50% relative humidity. Afterward, the glass plate was immersed in Milli-Q water immediately to create a membrane with an asymmetric structure. These asymmetric membranes were peeled off from the glass plate and soaked in Milli-Q water. Finally, the asymmetric membrane was immersed in IPA for 36 h and then lifted and evaporated at room temperature for 24 h.

Fabrication of LMO/CNT electrodes

Typically, 50 mg of CNTs was dispersed in 25 mL of NMP with ultrasonic processing for 1 h. Then, 300 mg of LiMn2O4 was added into the mixed solution with further ultrasonic treatment for 0.5 h. The LMO/CNT composite material was obtained by vacuum filtration. In a typical electrode preparation, the LMO/CNT composite material and PVDF were mixed in a weight ratio of 9:1 in NMP to form a slurry, and then the slurry was uniformly pasted on Al foil. Finally, the electrodes were vacuum dried at 45 °C to remove the solvent.

Characterization

Electrical characterization

Electrical measurements were obtained with a Keithley 6487 semiconductor picoammeter (Keithley Instruments, Cleveland, OH). The asymmetric SPEEK/PES blend membranes were clamped between two compartments. For the ionic transport measurement, identical KCl solutions from 0.1 μM to 1 M were used to fill the two chambers containing a pair of Ag/AgCl electrodes as voltage application terminals. The CV measurements were carried out with an electrochemical workstation (CHI-660E, Chenhua, Shanghai) utilizing a three-electrode system. The membrane was placed between two compartments of the two-cell system. Briefly, 20 mM anionic [Fe(CN)6]3- and cationic [Ru(NH3)6]3+ probes (the supporting electrolyte was 0.1 M KCl (pH≈4.3)) were selected and added into one compartment, while the other compartment was added into Milli-Q water. After 1 h, exudation was used in the CV measurements. Platinum wires served as the working electrode and counter electrode, while a Ag/AgCl electrode was used as the reference electrode. The scan rate was set at 10 mV/s, and the measurements were conducted at ~22 °C. For the energy conversion tests, a pair of LMO/CNT electrodes was utilized to apply a transmembrane potential. The feed and permeate chambers were filled with a high-concentration LiBr solution and a low-concentration LiBr solution, respectively. The testing area of the membrane was 0.20 mm2.

Permeation experiments

Permeation experiments were performed using a two-cell system separated by an asymmetric SPEEK/PES blend membrane. The permeability rate was tested separately to avoid interference because the fluorescence emission of rhodamine 6 G is much stronger than that of sulforhodamine. Either 0.1 mM rhodamine 6 G or 0.1 mM sulforhodamine solution was added into the feed cell facing the bottom side of the membrane. The exudations in the receptor chamber were tested using a spectrofluorophotometer every 5 min.

Membrane structure characterization

1H NMR (nuclear magnetic resonance)measurements were obtained with a Bruker AVNANCE 400 spectrometer. Field-emission SEM (scanning electron microscope, Hitachi S-4800) at an accelerating voltage of 10 kV was used to observe the membranes. Cross-sectional membrane samples were cryogenically fractured through the use of liquid nitrogen. The membrane samples were sputter-coated with gold before the SEM test. Contact angle measurements were obtained through the use of photographs, an OCA25 contact angle measuring instrument (Dataphysics, Germany) and ImageJ software. Each membrane was measured five times, and the average was calculated. XPS (X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy) spectra were obtained on a PHI Quantera scanning X-ray microprobe with a monochromated Al Kα radiation source at 1486.7 eV. Surface zeta potentials were determined on a zeta potential analyzer (SurPASS 3, Anton Paar, Austria). The permeability tests of fluorophores were monitored by a spectrofluorophotometer (RF-5301PC, SHIMADZU, Japan).

Results and discussion

Membrane characterization and ionic transport properties

Asymmetric SPEEK/PES blend membranes were fabricated by utilizing nonsolvent-induced phase inversion with the assistance of trace water as the nonsolvent additive (Supplementary Fig. S1). SPEEK was prepared by sulfonating PEEK with concentrated sulfuric acid, and the degree of sulfonation (DS) of SPEEK was 94.6% according to the 1H NMR technique (Supplementary Fig. S2). To obtain an asymmetric finger-like membrane, trace Milli-Q water was added to the SPEEK/PES casting solution as a nonsolvent additive. Usually, some additives increase the viscosity of a casting solution, inhibiting the mutual diffusion process of the solvent and nonsolvent owing to the reduced fluidity of a mixed solution18. The nonsolvent water induced gelation of the casting solution by forming a three-dimensional network due to hydrogen bonding interactions between the trace H2O and sulfonated groups in SPEEK, which slowed down the movement of the polymer chains and the coalescence of the polymer-poor phase19,20. The polymer solution was cast onto a glass plate, and the solution thickness was controlled by the casting knife21. Then, the glass plate was immediately transferred into a Milli-Q water bath at ~20 °C to form a membrane. Afterward, the membrane reorganization process was conducted. The membrane was first immersed in IPA for 36 h and then dried at room temperature. The reorganization of polymer chains (hydrophilic) occurs during both the IPA immersion and evaporation processes, forming a more hydrophilic channel surface with more sulfonated groups in the asymmetric SPEEK/PES blend membrane.

The microstructure of the membrane top surface displays a dense structure (Supplementary Fig. S3a), while the bottom surface morphology of the membrane shows large pores (Supplementary Fig. S3b, c, d). The pores in the dense layer of the SPEEK/PES membrane have a diameter of ~11 nm. Membranes with different thicknesses were obtained by adjusting the height of the casting knife (Supplementary Fig. S4). The structure of the membranes prepared by the phase inversion method is mainly determined by the solvent/nonsolvent exchange rate, SPEEK/PES polymer interaction, and viscosity of the casting solution22,23. With increasing casting solution concentration, the macrovoid size decreases and the sponge-like region increases (Supplementary Figs. S5S8). These changes occur because the higher viscosity of the casting solution slows down the coagulation process and reduces the solvent/nonsolvent exchange rate24. The major mass loss occurred in the temperature range of 500 − 650 °C, corresponding to polymer combustion (Supplementary Fig. S9). A high-temperature LiBr solution can be utilized due to the heat resistance of the membrane. In addition, the cost of the SPEEK/PES membrane, approximately 8.7 USD($)/m2 (Table S1), is much lower than the international cost target (11 USD($)/m2) for ion-selective membrane-based RED technology. Collectively, this asymmetric structure is related to the solvent/nonsolvent exchange and polymer solidification processes during the phase inversion process.

The ionic transport properties of the asymmetric SPEEK/PES blend membranes with and without IPA treatment were examined by obtaining current−voltage (I − V) measurements. After IPA-induced membrane reorganization, the ionic current increases from approximately 0.10 μA to 0.35 μA (Fig. 2a). The zeta potential measurements confirm that the surface charge density of the membrane increases after reorganization, which means that the groups containing oxygen (–O–, –SO3, > C = O), especially the polar sulfonated groups, migrate to the channel surface through the IPA treatment (Fig. 2a, inset). This migration can also be confirmed by the X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) results, which show that the atomic content of sulfur and oxygen on the top layer of the membrane increases after IPA treatment (Tables S2,3). The transmembrane conductance deviates from bulk behavior at 0.01 M and gradually approaches plateaus at lower concentrations, which means that ionic transport through the asymmetric SPEEK/PES blend membrane is governed by the surface charge (Fig. 2b). Additionally, the reorganized membrane with more charged groups in the channels demonstrate higher transmembrane conductance.

To investigate the ion transport behavior of the membrane under a concentration gradient, Idiff and Vdiff were measured. Vdiff originates from the ion selectivity of the membrane, which can result in the difference in the diffusive fluxes of anions and cations. The diffusion potential can be calculated by Vdiff = VappEredox (Supplementary Note 1). Along with the increase in the concentration gradient, Idiff and Vdiff both increase (Fig. 2c). Vdiff originates from the ion selectivity of the membrane, the main diffusive flux of cations (i.e., Li+). Due to the sulfonated groups in SPEEK, the membrane exhibits excellent cation selectivity. The cation selectivity was first investigated by electroactive redox probes (i.e., [Ru(NH3)6]3+ and [Fe(CN)6]3−) in cyclic voltammetry (CV) (Fig. 2d). The diffusion coefficients of [Ru(NH3)6]3+ and [Fe(CN)6]3− are 7.4 × 10−6 cm2/s and 7.6 × 10−6 cm2/s, respectively25. The reduction/oxidation peaks of [Ru(NH3)6]2+/3+ are observed at −0.27 and −0.18 V, respectively. Additionally, the reduction/oxidation peaks of [Fe(CN)6]3−/4− are observed at 0.094 and 0.17 V, respectively. These curves show strong electrochemical peaks for the transport of the cationic probe [Ru(NH3)6]3+ (red trace) and weak anionic peaks for the [Fe(CN)6]3− (blue trace) probe, and the peak currents of [Ru(NH3)6]2+/3+ and [Fe(CN)6]3−/4− are approximately 228 μA and 55 μA, respectively. Due to the negatively charged character of the membrane, the different diffusion abilities of the specific probe result in a distinct voltammetric response. To further confirm the ion selectivity of the asymmetric SPEEK/PES blend membrane, rhodamine (Rh) 6 G and sulforhodamine with opposite charges (Fig. 2e) were chosen as fluorophores due to their high quantum yields for transmembrane transport measurements. Permeation experiments were conducted with a two-cell system, which was separated by an asymmetric membrane. The feed chamber was filled with fluorophore solutions (1.0 × 10−4 M), and the permeability of both fluorophores was monitored by taking the fluorescence spectra of the solution in the receptor chamber every 5 min. The permeability rate of Rh (+) is much larger than that of Rh (−), which corresponds to the CV test results. The ion selectivity was quantified by calculating the transference number of cations. With the increase in the concentration gradient, the transference number reaches a peak value at a 50-fold salinity gradient of LiBr solution (Fig. 2f). The decrease in transference number under a higher salinity gradient could be due to the increase in concentration polarization26,27.

Asymmetric SPEEK/PES blend membranes for osmotic power generation at room temperature

Thereafter, screening of the casting solution thickness was conducted, as well as the polymer concentration in the casting solution and SPEEK/(SPEEK + PES) weight ratio. The output power density can be calculated by Pmax = I2 × RL, and a maximum value can be obtained when the load resistance is equal to the total resistance of the membrane, electrodes, and salt solutions. The maximum power density first increases from ~4.76 W/m2 to the peak value of ~9.26 W/m2 and then decreases to ~6.38 W/m2 when the thickness of the casting solution increases from 25 μm to 100 μm and then to 150 μm, respectively (Fig. 3c); these thicknesses correspond to the increasing thickness of the top layer from approximately 0.63 to 1.10 μm and further to ~1.29 μm (Supplementary Fig. S4). The increase in the top layer thickness can simultaneously increase the ion selectivity and membrane resistance, and the power density reaches a peak value with an ~1.10 μm top layer to balance the two opposite effects. Similarly, the optimum polymer concentration of casting solution is screened to be 10% (Fig. 3d), corresponding to the maximum power density (i.e., ~9.26 W/m2). For the low concentration of casting solution (i.e., 8%), the membrane showing large pores in the top layer (Supplementary Fig. S5) induces relatively poor ion selectivity along with low output current density (Supplementary Fig. S15a) and power density. Additionally, the continual increase in casting solution concentration generally increases the compactness of membranes, which reduces the Li+-ion flux through the membrane. In addition, with increasing power density from ~1.52 W/m2 to ~9.26 W/m2, the SPEEK/(SPEEK + PES) weight ratio in the mixed solution gradually increases from 0 to 25 wt% (Fig. 3e); moreover, the current density increases (Supplementary Fig. S15b) due to the increasing number of sulfated groups in the membrane. As the sulfur atomic content in SPEEK is lower than that in PES, the corresponding sulfur atomic content decreases almost linearly as the SPEEK/(SPEEK + PES) weight ratio increases (Supplementary Fig. S16a, b). For a membrane used in aqueous solution, the wettability of the membrane is a very important factor in determining the permeate flux behavior24. The hydrophilic sulfated groups in SPEEK largely affect the wettability of the SPEEK/PES membrane. Thus, with the increase in the SPEEK/(SPEEK + PES) weight ratio in the casting solution, the contact angle of the membrane decreases from approximately 94.3° to 34.8° (Supplementary Fig. S16c), showing a more hydrophilic membrane22. The contact angle decreases in two different trends before and after 10% SPEEK/(SPEEK + PES), which might stem from the hydrophilic part of SPEEK interacting with IPA during the reorganization process30. Thus, when the SPEEK/(SPEEK + PES) weight ratio is <10%, IPA can effectively interact with the “few” sulfated groups in the membrane; when the SPEEK/(SPEEK + PES) weight ratio is >10%, the ability of IPA to bring sulfated groups to the channel surface is relatively insufficient due to the “excessive” content of sulfated groups and a flat contact angle decrease. This mechanism is also supported by the sulfur atomic variation tendency (Supplementary Fig. S16b)31.

As the concentration of LiBr can reach ~13 M due to its very high solubility, the current system can work under extended concentration gradient conditions. The c(LiBr, low) was set at 0.01 M. As shown in Fig. 3f, the peak power density values are approximately 1.32 W/m2, 1.78 W/m2, 9.26 W/m2, 13.03 W/m2, 17.41 W/m2, and 33.00 W/m2 for the 5-fold, 10-fold, 50-fold, 100-fold, 500-fold, and 1000-fold salinity gradients, respectively. The current densities increase gradually with increasing concentration gradient (Supplementary Fig. S17). Furthermore, for the above salinity gradients, the corresponding efficiencies are approximately 27.4%, 29.6%, 31.5%, 29.8%, 27.8%, and 24.8% (Supplementary Note 4, Table S4). The high solubility of LiBr in water is surely beneficial for osmotic energy harvesting.

Thermal-field effect on energy conversion

The thermal-field effect on energy conversion under a certain concentration gradient was evaluated. Figure 4a is a schematic illustration of the energy conversion process under a series of temperature gradients. The high and low concentrations of LiBr solutions were set at 0.5 M and 0.01 M, respectively; the temperature of the low salinity chamber (Tlc) was set at 25 °C, and the temperature of the high salinity chamber (Thc) was gradually increased from −5 °C to 10 °C, 25 °C, 40 °C, and 55 °C. The ΔT of the two chambers is defined as ΔT = Thc − Tlc. The corresponding JSC and VOC values under different temperature gradients are shown in Fig. 4b. Both the JSC and VOC values increase gradually as ΔT increases and reach maximum values of approximately 107 A/m2 and 203 mV, respectively. Under the 50-fold salinity gradient, the corresponding power densities increase from approximately 2.29 W/m2 to 16.50 W/m2 when ΔT increases from −30 to 30 °C (Fig. 4c and Supplementary Figs. S18, 19). When both cells are set at 55 °C, the output power density reaches ~18.8 W/m2 (Supplementary Fig. S20). According to the previous theoretical calculation, the LiBr-water solution offers a higher power density than the NaCl-water solution15, and the comparison among existing technologies and this work are shown in Table S5. The osmotic energy conversion using LiBr solution generates a higher output power density than that of NaCl solution. The counterion flux density is almost zero under open-circuit conditions, and the concentration gradient inside the membrane is also almost negligible. Therefore, the physical explanation of the generation of a potential drop in the membrane caused by the thermal-field effect can be explained by the equation below32:

$$Q_i^md\ln T + z_iFd\phi ^m = 0$$

where $$Q_i^m$$ is the heat of transport of ionic species i (i = 1, 2), T is the thermodynamic temperature, zi is the charge number of ionic species i, F is the Faraday constant, and ϕm is the electrostatic potential inside the membrane.

If $$Q_i^m$$ > 0, the ions tend to move toward chambers of lower temperature. Thus, an electric field is generated inside the membrane, and current occurs under closed-circuit conditions. Moreover, the corresponding conversion efficiencies increase from approximately 15.2% to 46.8% (Table S6), indicating that the elevated temperature in the high salinity cell can largely promote energy conversion. Additionally, the current density and corresponding peak power density increase as ΔT increases (Fig. 4d and Supplementary Fig. S21). The increase in current density along with the temperature elevation can be described by the equation J = 75.1+1.88ΔT. Interestingly, the resistance changes with temperature, which can be described as RL = 3.80−0.00267ΔT+0.000361ΔT2−0.0000108ΔT3, and shows similar behavior with the reported resistance changing of a lithium-ion battery33. The resistance decreases rapidly when T increases from −5 to 10 °C, while it decreases slowly when T increases from 10 to 55 °C. The slow decrease in resistance might be because the low salinity solution resistance is the main part of the total resistance. A higher peak power density value is obtained when the temperature in the high salinity chamber increases, which may be due to the increasing transmembrane migration of Li+-ion flux driven by the temperature gradient34,35,36. The traditional processes for converting low-grade energy to power are normally based on the production of mechanical energy. The energy is converted to electricity through a turbine, such as steam Rankine cycles and organic Rankine cycles. Several other technologies, including closed-loop RED technology, can also realize thermal-electric conversion, and we list all these technologies in Table S7 for comparison. Traditional techniques have demonstrated that the conversion of heat at low temperatures (<100 °C) to electricity have low efficiencies, high costs, and short lifetimes. The closed-loop reverse electrodialysis (RED) system generates electricity from low-grade heat at low temperature (<100 °C)37. In this regard, closed-loop RED is proposed as a suitable alternative to convert low-grade heat (<100 °C) to electricity.

Conclusions

In this study, we demonstrate the feasibility of designing a high-performance osmotic power generator using LiBr solutions. The osmotic power generator is composed of an asymmetric SPEEK/PES blend membrane and a pair of LMO/CNT electrodes. An asymmetric membrane with a finger-like structure is prepared via nonsolvent-induced phase inversion assisted by trace nonsolvent additives and followed by IPA reorganization treatment. More negatively charged groups are brought to the channel surface during the reorganization process, inducing excellent cation selectivity. The robust membrane can be used to harvest the Gibbs free energy of LiBr solutions with different concentrations and temperatures. The generator presents high-performance osmotic energy conversion using LiBr solutions with a power density of ~9.26 W/m2 under a 50-fold concentration gradient, and it can even achieve ~33.00 W/m2 under a 1000-fold concentration gradient. In addition, the energy conversion of the system can be further promoted by thermal field regulation and reach a power density up to ~16.50 W/m2 under a temperature gradient (ΔT = 30 °C) at a 50-fold concentration gradient. The current work shows the great potential of applying a LiBr solution-based RED system for high-performance osmotic energy conversion and further demonstrates the great potential of RED-based hybrid systems for harvesting other energy sources. In this regard, with a properly designed RED system, different energy sources, such as low-grade heat, light, sound, wind energy, and pressure, could be effectively extracted and converted into electricity, providing new viewpoints for combined energy harvesting.

References

1. 1.

Logan, B. E. & Elimelech, M. Membrane-based processes for sustainable power generation using water. Nature 488, 313–319 (2012).

2. 2.

Yip, N. Y. & Elimelech, M. Thermodynamic and energy efficiency analysis of power generation from natural salinity gradients by pressure retarded osmosis. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46, 5230–5239 (2012).

3. 3.

Pattle, R. E. Production of electric power by mixing fresh and salt water in the hydroelectric pile. Nature 174, 660 (1954).

4. 4.

Mei, Y. & Tang, C. Y. Y. Recent developments and future perspectives of reverse electrodialysis technology: a review. Desalination 425, 156–174 (2018).

5. 5.

Xin, W. et al. Biomimetic nacre-like silk-crosslinked membranes for osmotic energy harvesting. ACS Nano 14, 9701–9710 (2020).

6. 6.

Chen, J. et al. Ultrathin and robust silk fibroin membrane for high-performance osmotic energy conversion. ACS Energy Lett. 5, 742–748 (2020).

7. 7.

Huang, X. et al. Engineered PES/SPES nanochannel membrane for salinity gradient power generation. Nano Energy 59, 354–362 (2019).

8. 8.

Rui, L., Zhengfei, K., Zhichun, L. & Wei, L. Temperature regulated reverse electrodialysis in charged nanopores. J. Membr. Sci. 561, 1–9 (2018).

9. 9.

Hou, L. et al. Separation of organic liquid mixture by flexible nanofibrous membranes with precisely tunable wettability. NPG Asia Mater. 8, e334 (2016).

10. 10.

An, X., Hu, Y., Wang, N., Wang, T. & Liu, Z. Breaking the permeability–selectivity trade-off in thin-film composite polyamide membranes with a PEG-b-PSF-b-PEG block copolymer ultrafiltration membrane support through post-annealing treatment. NPG Asia Mater. 11, 13 (2019).

11. 11.

Kim, D. W., Lee, J. H., Kim, J. K. & Jeong, U. Material aspects of triboelectric energy generation and sensors. NPG Asia Mater. 12, 6 (2020).

12. 12.

Park, S., Lee, H., Kim, Y.-J. & Lee, P. S. Fully laser-patterned stretchable microsupercapacitors integrated with soft electronic circuit components. NPG Asia Mater. 10, 959–969 (2018).

13. 13.

Zhang, Z. et al. Ultrathin and ion-selective janus membranes for high-performance osmotic energy conversion. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 8905–8914 (2017).

14. 14.

Zhang, Z. et al. Improved osmotic energy conversion in heterogeneous membrane boosted by three-dimensional hydrogel interface. Nat. Commun. 11, 875 (2020).

15. 15.

Tamburini, A. et al. Reverse electrodialysis heat engine for sustainable power production. Appl. Energy 206, 1334–1353 (2017).

16. 16.

Veerman, J., Saakes, M., Metz, S. J. & Harmsen, G. J. Reverse electrodialysis: performance of a stack with 50 cells on the mixing of sea and river water. J. Membr. Sci. 327, 136–144 (2009).

17. 17.

Long, R., Kuang, Z., Liu, Z. & Liu, W. Temperature regulated reverse electrodialysis in charged nanopores. J. Membr. Sci. 561, 1–9 (2018).

18. 18.

Wang, Z.-G., Xu, Z.-K. & Wan, L.-S. Modulation the morphologies and performance of polyacrylonitrile-based asymmetric membranes containing reactive groups: effect of non-solvents in the dope solution. J. Membr. Sci. 278, 447–456 (2006).

19. 19.

Zhang, L. et al. Preparation of PES/SPSf blend ultrafiltration membranes with high performance via H2O-induced gelation phase separation. J. Membr. Sci. 540, 136–145 (2017).

20. 20.

Zhao, Y. et al. Robust sulfonated poly (ether ether ketone) nanochannels for high-performance osmotic energy conversion. Natl. Sci. Rev. 7, 1349–1359 (2020).

21. 21.

Sun, Y. et al. Tailoring a poly(ether sulfone) bipolar membrane: osmotic-energy generator with high power density. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59, 17423–17428 (2020).

22. 22.

Rahimpour, A. & Madaeni, S. S. Polyethersulfone (PES)/cellulose acetate phthalate (CAP) blend ultrafiltration membranes: preparation, morphology, performance and antifouling properties. J. Membr. Sci. 305, 299–312 (2007).

23. 23.

Liu, Y., Koops, G. H. & Strathmann, H. Characterization of morphology controlled polyethersulfone hollow fiber membranes by the addition of polyethylene glycol to the dope and bore liquid solution. J. Membr. Sci. 223, 187–199 (2003).

24. 24.

Wang, W. Y. et al. Preparation and characterization of SLS-CNT/PES ultrafiltration membrane with antifouling and antibacterial properties. J. Membr. Sci. 548, 459–469 (2018).

25. 25.

Kim, J. & Bard, A. J. Electrodeposition of single nanometer-size Pt nanoparticles at a tunneling ultramicroelectrode and determination of fast heterogeneous kinetics for Ru(NH3)63+ reduction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 975–979 (2016).

26. 26.

Kim, S. J., Ko, S. H., Kang, K. H. & Han, J. Direct seawater desalination by ion concentration polarization. Nat. Nanotechnol. 5, 297–301 (2010).

27. 27.

Dlugolecki, P., Gambier, A., Nijmeijer, K. & Wessling, M. Practical potential of reverse electrodialysis as process for sustainable energy generation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43, 6888–6894 (2009).

28. 28.

Okubo, M. et al. Fast Li-ion insertion into nanosized LiMn2O4 without domain boundaries. ACS Nano 4, 741–752 (2010).

29. 29.

Zampardi, G., Batchelor-McAuley, C., Katelhon, E. & Compton, R. G. Lithium-ion-transfer kinetics of single LiMn2O4 particles. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56, 641–644 (2017).

30. 30.

Lu, W. et al. Solvent-induced rearrangement of ion-transport channels: a way to create advanced porous membranes for vanadium flow batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 27, 1604587 (2017).

31. 31.

Wang, T., Wang, Y.-Q., Su, Y.-L. & Jiang, Z.-Y. Antifouling ultrafiltration membrane composed of polyethersulfone and sulfobetaine copolymer. J. Membr. Sci. 280, 343–350 (2006).

32. 32.

Jokinen, M., Manzanares, J. A., Kontturi, K. & Murtomäki, L. Thermal potential of ion-exchange membranes and its application to thermoelectric power generation. J. Membr. Sci. 499, 234–244 (2016).

33. 33.

Ahmed, S. H., Kang, X. S. & Shrestha, S. O. B. Effects of temperature on internal resistances of lithium-ion batteries. J. Energy Resour. Technol. 137, 031901 (2015).

34. 34.

Benneker, A. M., Klomp, J., Lammertink, R. G. H. & Wood, J. A. Influence of temperature gradients on mono- and divalent ion transport in electrodialysis at limiting currents. Desalination 443, 62–69 (2018).

35. 35.

Suo, L. et al. Advanced high-voltage aqueous lithium-ion battery enabled by “water-in-bisalt” electrolyte. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55, 7136–7141 (2016).

36. 36.

Zhang, C. et al. Anion-sorbent composite separators for high-rate lithium-ion batteries. Adv. Mater. 31, 1808338 (2019).

37. 37.

Ortega-Delgado, B. et al. Boosting the performance of a Reverse Electrodialysis–Multi-Effect Distillation Heat Engine by novel solutions and operating conditions. Appl. Energy 253, 113489 (2019).

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21625303, 21905287, 21988102), the National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFA0206904, 2017YFA0206900, 2020YFA0710401), and the Key Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (QYZDY-SSW-SLH014).

Author information

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xiang-Yu Kong or Liping Wen.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Sun, Y., Wu, Y., Hu, Y. et al. Thermoenhanced osmotic power generator via lithium bromide and asymmetric sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone)/poly(ether sulfone) nanofluidic membrane. NPG Asia Mater 13, 50 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41427-021-00317-9