Abstract
Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is highly aggressive and its treatment remains challenging, understanding its pathogenesis is critical for future targeted therapy. SUMO specific proteases 1 (SENP1) is an important protein that regulates the balance between SUMOylation and deSUMOylation. We found that SENP1 was upregulated in MCL patient samples and cell lines. Knockdown of SENP1 could inhibit the proliferation and promote the apoptosis of MCL cells. We also found that SENP1 knockdown caused inhibition of the JAK-STAT5 pathway and upregulation of tumor suppressor cytokine signaling 2 (SOCS2). Moreover, MCL tumor growth in vivo was significantly suppressed after SENP1 knockdown in a xenograft nude mouse model. In summary, our results showed that SENP1 is involved in the pathogenesis of MCL and may be a potential therapeutic target.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Mantle-cell lymphoma (MCL) is a highly malignant and aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) which accounts for 5–10% of all NHL [1]. The disease is characterized by cyclin D1 overexpression caused by chromosomal translocation t (11;14) (q13; q32) [2, 3]. Although the treatment of MCL patients has achieved significant advances in chemotherapy, targeted therapy and immunotherapy, it remains challenging since most of MCL patients still experience early and frequent relapse and finally die from the disease. New therapeutic targets are urgently needed to be developed for these patients.
SUMOylation is a crucial post-translational modification characterized by covalent conjugation of small ubiquitin-like modifiers (SUMOs) to target proteins [4, 5], which exerts indispensable roles in various cellular processes, such as protein localization, gene transcription, and DNA replication [6,7,8]. The modification is a dynamic reversible process and the deconjugation of SUMOylation (deSUMOylation) is mediated by SUMO-specific proteases (SENPs) [9, 10]. Among the seven members of SENPs, SENP1 is wildly distributed in the nucleus and also expressed in cytoplasm with functions of deconjugating a great number of SUMOylated proteins and processing the precursor SUMO to generate mature SUMO, which plays the most potent regulatory role in maintaining the balance of SUMOylation and deSUMOylation [11,12,13]. The dysregulated expression of SENP1 has been implicated in the pathogenesis of various cancers, including colon cancer [14], prostate cancer [15, 16], etc. Moreover, SENP1 specific inhibitors have shown promising therapeutic effects in a variety of cancers, which suggested that SENP1 may be an effective potential therapeutic target in the treatment of cancers. However, little is known about the role of SENP1 in MCL.
In this study, we investigated the function and the underlying molecular mechanism of SENP1 in MCL pathogenesis. We found SENP1 was upregulated in MCL patient samples and cell lines; knockdown of SENP1 inhibited MCL cell proliferation and promoted cell apoptosis, and also inhibited MCL tumor growth in mice; mechanically, knockdown of SENP1 resulted in an increased expression of tumor suppressor cytokine signaling 2 (SOCS2) by inhibiting the JAK-STAT5 activity. These findings show that SENP1 is involved in the pathogenesis of MCL and may be a potential therapeutic target.
Materials and methods
Chemicals and reagents
Cell culture reagents (RPMI 1640 medium, DMEM medium and fetal bovine serum) were provided by Gibco Co. (Grand Island, NY). All primers were provided by Sangon Biotech, and viral constructs were provided by Genechem Co. (Shanghai, China). Trizol RNA extraction kit was provided by Invitrogen Co., PrimeScript RT reagent Kit and SYBR Green real time quantitative PCR kit were provided by TaKaRa. NE-PER™ Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Extraction Reagents were purchased from Thermo Fisher (Shanghai, China). Click-iT® EdU Imaging Kit (#C10425) was from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA). In-Situ Cell Death Detection Kit, TMR red (#12156792910) was from Roche (Basel, Switzerland). APC Annexin V Apoptosis Detection Kit with PI (#640932) was purchased from BioLegend (San Diego, CA, USA). The antibodies against SENP1 (#ab108981) and GAPDH (#ab20272) were purchased from Abcam (Cambridge, England). Antibodies for SOCS2 (#2779), Rb (#9313), p-Rb (#8180), cyclinD1 (#4874), β-actin (#2062), Bid (#8762 S), Caspase 9 (#9508 T), C-caspase 3 (#9661 S), PARP (#5625 T), p53 (#9282), STAT5 (#94205), p-STAT5 (#4322 and #9359), LaminB1 (#13435), Ki67 (#12202) and DAPI (#4083) were obtained from Cell Signaling Technology (Shanghai, China). Recombinant human erythropoietin (EPO) injection (EPIAO, #S19980073) was purchased from Shenyang Sansheng Pharmaceutical Co. (Shenyang, China).
Patient specimens
Lymph node specimens were obtained from 4 patients with previously untreated MCL and 4 patients with reactive lymph node enlargement who underwent lymph node biopsy at the Southwest Hospital affiliated to Amy Medical University (Third Military Medical University). The specimens were fixed in 10% formalin and processed for paraffin embedding. Informed consent was received from each patient, and the ethics committee of the Southwest Hospital approved the study.
Immunohistochemical staining
Immunohistochemistry was performed to detect the expression of SENP1, Ki67, and p-STAT5. The detailed process has been described in our previous article [17]. In brief, the formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimens were sliced into 4 µm tissue sections, then depolished with xylene and rehydrated with an alcohol solution. After antigen retrieval, the tissue sections were incubated with anti-SENP1, anti-Ki67, or anti-p-STAT5 primary antibody for 24 hours (h) at 4 °C, and then washed with PBS and incubated with peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-human/mouse secondary antibody (1:200 dilution, #ab6858 and #ab150113, Abcam, USA) for 1 h at room temperature. Five fields were randomly selected from each section under a light microscope (100×, BX51, Olympus, Japan) fitted with a digital camera (DP72, Olympus, Japan). Image-Pro Plus 6.0 software was used to quantitively analyze the images. Quantification of SENP1, Ki67, and p-STAT5 was determined by mean of integrated optical density (IOD).
GEO datasets analysis
Normalized microarray data in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) under accession number GSE32018 was downloaded and analyzed, including 24 freshly frozen lymph nodes from MCL patients and 13 freshly frozen normal lymph node or tonsil tissues as controls. The probe-level data in CEL files were converted into expression profiles in R software (https://www.r-project.org/) and the robust multiarray average (RMA) algorithm with affy package was used to correct and normalize expression profiles data. Expression levels of SENP1 and SOCS2 were compared between MCL samples and control samples, and their correlation was analyzed in all samples.
Cell lines and cell culture
Human MCL cell lines (MAVER-1, REC-1, Mino, Jeko-1) were purchased from ATCC (Beijing, China) and human normal B cell line (Wil2-s) from Institute of Cell Resource Conservation of China National Institute for Food and Drug Administration (Beijing, China), respectively in 2018. They were authenticated by the suppliers and tested by PCR to be free of Mycoplasma contamination in November 2018 upon completion of the experiments. The cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium, supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 1% penicillin-streptomycin (Gibco) at 37 °C in 5% CO2 incubator.
RT-qPCR
Total RNA of cells was extracted with Trizol kit (TaKaRa, Shiga, Japan). A total of 1ug RNA was reverse-transcribed to synthesis complementary DNA (cDNA) using PrimeScript RT reagent Kit (TaKaRa). The cDNAs were quantified by quantitative PCR (qPCR) with SYBR Green real time quantitative PCR kit (TaKaRa). β-actin was used as an internal control. The primers used in the study were shown in Table S1. Each sample was analyzed in triplicate. Relative expression levels from three independent experiments were calculated with the 2-△△CT method.
Western blot
Cellular samples were lysed with RIPA buffer containing a protease inhibitor cocktail as previously described. Nuclear and cytoplasmic proteins were extracted using the NE-PER™ Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Extraction Reagents (Thermo Fisher, Shanghai, China) according to manufacturer’s protocol. The protein concentration was determined using Enhanced BCA Protein Assay Reagent (Beyotime, Jiangsu, China). Equal quantities of proteins from each sample were separated by 10% SDS-PAGE, and then transferred to PVDF membranes (Bio-Rad, 162–0177). After blocking with 5% fat-free dry milk, the membranes were incubated with specific primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C and corresponding HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies for 2 h at room temperature. Protein bands were visualized with an enhanced chemiluminescence system (Perkin-Elmer Life Sciences, Boston, USA). Band intensities were quantified using ImageJ software, and β-actin, LaminB1 or GAPDH was used as internal reference.
Construction of stable SENP1 knockdown cell lines
Lentiviral vectors encoding three different short hairpin RNAs (shRNAs), targeting human SENP1 (named as shSENP1-1, shSENP1-2 and shSENP1-3 respectively, listed in Table S1), were purchased from Shanghai Genechem of China (Shanghai, China).
MCL cells (MAVER-1, REC-1, Mino, Jeko-1) were transfected with the shSENP1 lentivirus or empty lentiviral vector (named as shCon) with polybrene (8 μg/ml, Sigma-Aldrich, Missouri, USA). The transfected cells were then subjected to selection by puromycin (3.0 μg/ml) for 4–5 days. Knockdown of SENP1 in the stable cells was verified by RT-qPCR and western blot.
Cell proliferation assay
The cell proliferation was measured with Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) assay according to manufacturer’s direction (Beyotime, Shanghai, China). In detail, MCL cells were seeded in 96-well plates at a density of 5000 cells/well and cultured in RPMI 1640 with 10% FBS at 37 °C in 5% CO2 incubator for 5 days. The optical density (OD) was measured at 450 nm on each day. The cell viability of the Jeko-1 and Mino cells transfected with shSENP1 was normalized with the value from the cells transfected with shCon. Each experiment was repeated in triplicate.
Cell cycle analysis
MCL cells were seeded into 6-well plates (1×104 cells per well), 10 mM Edu (Invitrogen) was added to each well and incubated at 37 °C for 2 h. Edu staining were performed with the Click-iT Edu kit (Invitrogen) according to manufacturer’s protocol. Before being analyzed on FACScan flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA), the cells were stained with DAPI at room temperature for 5 minutes (min). The cell cycle distribution was calculated using the FlowJo software (Treestar, Ashland, OR, USA). Cells were divided into G1 or G2 phase according to the DNA content displayed by DAPI. Each experiment was repeated in triplicate.
Cell apoptosis assay
Cell apoptosis was evaluated by flow cytometric analysis with Annexin V-APC and propidium iodide (PI) double staining according to the manufacturer’s instructions (BD Biosciences). In brief, 1 × 106 cells were stained with 2 ul of Annexin V-APC and 5 μl of PI (50 μg/ml) in 1× binding buffer (10 mM of HEPES, pH 7.4, 140 mM of NaOH, and 2.5 mM of CaCl2) for 15 min in the dark at room temperature. Quantification of apoptotic cells was analyzed by FACScan flow cytometer and calculated using the FlowJo software. Cells stained positive for Annexin V-APC, PI, or both were considered apoptotic cells. Each experiment was repeated in triplicate.
Cells treated with EPO
Jeko-1 and Mino cells transfected with shSENP1-3 were treated with EPO at a concentration of 50 IU/ml and 40 IU/ml, respectively. After the cells treated with EPO for 1 days, SOCS2 mRNA level was detected by RT-qPCR, and protein levels of SOCS2, p-STAT5 and STAT5 were detected by western blot. Meanwhile, cell proliferation was measured with CCK-8 assay on day 0, 1, 2, and 3, cell apoptosis was evaluated by flow cytometric analysis with Annexin V-APC and PI double staining on day 2. Each experiment was repeated in triplicate.
mRNA sequencing and functional enrichment analysis
mRNA sequencing (mRNA-seq) was performed to analyze differentially-expressed genes (DEGs) between Jeko-1 cells with shCon and shSENP1, which was constructed by LC Science, Hangzhou, China. The DESeq2 R package (1.26.0) was used to obtain DEGs between groups. When adjusted P < 0.05, DEGs were considered as significantly different. Genes with an absolute value of log2 (fold change) (log2 FC) > 1 were identified as significantly differentially expressed genes. Heatmap was generate by heatmap version 1.0.10.
Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analyses were performed to reveal the significant pathways of DEGs using the clusterProfiler R (v3.13.0) package. KEGG terms with corrected P < 0.05 were considered significantly enriched by DEGs. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) was performed using the GSEA (v2.2.3, http://software.broadinstitute.org/gsea/downloads.jsp) with MSigDB-curated gene sets (c2.cp.kegg.v6.2.symbols.gmt).
In vivo xenograft studies
Four-week-old male BALB/c nude mice were obtained from the Laboratory Animal Center of Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University). They were randomly assigned into two groups (shCon and shSENP1-3). To develop xenograft mouse model, 1.5 × 107 stably transfected Jeko-1 cells with shCon or shSENP1-3 suspended in 100 μl serum-free medium plus 100 μl Matrigel, were subcutaneously injected to the right flanks of nude mice at the age of 6 weeks. Tumor volumes were measured and recorded every 2 days. The tumor volume was calculated using the equation reported in a previous study: V = (lengthlculat2)/2 (ref. [18]). Mice were finally killed at the 21st day after cell injection to obtain the tumor tissues. The expression of SENP1 in the tumor tissue was detected both by immunohistochemistry and western blot. Ki67 and p-STAT5 were also detected in the tumor tissue by immunohistochemistry. Each group contained 5 mice. All mouse experiments were performed without blinding and conducted in accordance with the Public Health Service Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. The Experimental Animal Ethics Committee of Army Medical University approved the experiments.
TUNEL assay
The harvested mouse tumor tissues above were fixed in 10% formalin and embedded with paraffin. The number of apoptotic cells in the tissues was detected using TUNEL assay (In-Situ Cell Death Detection Kit, Roche) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. In brief, after deparaffinized and rehydrated, 5-μm tissue sections were incubated with proteinase K, and the endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked with hydrogen peroxide. The sections were then incubated with the terminal TdT/ nucleotide mixture at 37 °C for 1 h. Next, the reaction was stopped and the sections were rinsed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Nuclear labeling was developed with horseradish peroxidase and diaminobenzidine. Hematoxylin was used for counterstaining. Cells with brown nuclei were considered as apoptotic cells. The percentage of apoptotic cells was calculated by an investigator who was blinded to the group assignment.
Statistical analysis
Data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical significance of differences between groups was determined using two-sided Student’s t test. The correlation between SENP1 and SOCS2 expression was analyzed by Pearson correlation. Sample sizes were determined according to previous literature. A P < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 20.0 or GraphPad Prism 6.0 software.
Results
SENP1 is upregulated in mantle cell lymphoma
To test the expression of SENP1 in MCL, we firstly detected the expression of SENP1 in human MCL specimens and reactive lymph node enlargement specimens by immunohistochemistry, which showed that the SENP1 protein expression in the MCL specimens was significantly higher than that in the reactive lymph node enlargement specimens (Fig. 1A, B). SENP1 mRNA expression was also analyzed in 24 freshly frozen tumor lymph nodes from MCL patients and 13 freshly frozen normal lymph nodes or tonsil tissues by extracting data from GEO database, and was confirmed to be significantly upregulated in MCL specimens compared with that in normal specimens (Fig. 1C). Furthermore, we detected the protein and mRNA expressions of SENP1 in several human MCL cell lines (MAVER-1, REC-1, Mino, Jeko-1) and human normal B cell line Wil2-s, which demonstrated that SENP1 mRNA and protein expressions were upregulated in REC-1, Mino, and Jeko-1 cells compared with Wil2-s cells (Fig. 1D, E). In addition, by measuring nuclear and cytoplasmic protein expression levels of SENP1 after subcellular fractionation in Jeko-1 and Mino cells, we found that SENP1 was distributed in both nucleus and cytoplasm, and it was more concentrated in the nucleus (Fig. 1F). These results confirm that SENP1 is upregulated in human MCL tissues and cells.
SENP1 knockdown inhibits proliferation of MCL cells
To clarify the influence of SENP1 on proliferation and cell cycle progression of MCL cells, we constructed stable Jeko-1 and Mino cells with SENP1 knockdown using three different lentiviral shRNAs targeting SENP1 (named as shSENP1-1, shSENP1-2 and shSENP1-3 respectively). Stable Jeko-1 or Mino cells transfected with empty lentiviral vector (named as shCon) were used as the negative control. RT-qPCR and western blotting demonstrated that stable Jeko-1 cells with shSENP1-2 or shSENP1-3 and stable Mino cells with shSENP1-1 or shSENP1-3 had more significantly decreased SENP1 mRNA and protein expression (Fig. 2A, B). The proliferation of the above stable cells was significantly inhibited as compared with that of control cells confirmed by the CCK-8 array (Fig. 2C). We also explored whether SENP1 knockdown can affect the cell cycle of MCL cells by flow cytometric analysis, and the results showed there was no significant difference in cell cycle distribution between stable cells with SENP1 knockdown and control cells (Fig. 2D, E), which was further demonstrated by detecting the expression of cell cycle related proteins, including Rb, p-Rb and CyclinD1 (Fig. 2F, G). Collectively, these results show that SENP1 knockdown inhibits MCL cell proliferation but without significant effect on cell cycle distribution.
SENP1 knockdown increases apoptosis of MCL cells
To test whether SENP1 knockdown can induce apoptosis in MCL cells, we detected the apoptosis of stable Jeko-1 cells with shSENP1-2 or shSENP1-3 and stable Mino cells with shSENP1-1 or shSENP1-3 by Annexin V-APC and PI double staining. The percentages of apoptotic cells were significantly higher in the Jeko-1 and Mino cells with SENP1 knockdown compared with the control cells (Fig. 3A–D). Correspondingly, SENP1 knockdown in Jeko-1 and Mino cells caused the activation of Caspase9 and C-caspase3, and the cleavage of Bid and PARP (Fig. 3E, F). These results indicate that SENP1 knockdown induces MCL cell apoptosis.
SENP1 knockdown promotes SOCS2 expression by inhibiting JAK-STAT5 pathway in MCL cells
To investigate the mechanism by which SENP1 exerted its effects on MCL cells, we performed mRNA-seq of stable Jeko-1 cells with shSENP1-3 or with shCon. As shown in Fig. 4A, multiple differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were found to be significantly differentially expressed genes between shSENP1 group and shCon group. KEGG enrichment analysis showed that the statistically significant DEGs were involved in various signaling pathways, including JAK-STAT pathway (Fig. 4B). GSEA further revealed that SENP1 expression was significantly associated with the JAK-STAT pathway (Fig. 4C). Among the significant DEGs, SOCS2 has been reported as a tumor suppressor and its expression is regulated by the JAK-STAT5 pathway. We found SOCS2 mRNA expression was significantly downregulated in MCL specimen compared with normal specimens by extracting data from GEO database (Fig. 4D). Pearson correlation analysis between SENP1 mRNA level and SOCS2 mRNA level in the same samples showed that there was a significantly negative correlation (r = −0.373, P = 0.035; Fig. 4E) between the two molecules. In Jeko-1 and Mino cells, both the mRNA and protein levels of SOCS2 were significantly upregulated by SENP1 knockdown (Fig. 4F, G). Moreover, knockdown of SENP1 in Jeko-1 and Mino cells deregulated p-STAT5 expression without significant influence of STAT5 expression (Fig. 4H). As previous studies demonstrated that EPO could activate the phosphorylation of Tyr694 of STAT5 (ref. [19, 20]), we treated Jeko-1-shSENP1 and Mino-shSENP1 cells with EPO, and tested the level of phosphorylation of STAT5, we found that EPO can activate the phosphorylation of STAT5 in Jeko-1 and Mino cells and inhibit expression of SOCS2 (Fig. 5A, B). We also tested proliferation and apoptosis of these cell lines, and found EPO could rescue the effect of SENP1 knockdown on MCL cell proliferation and apoptosis, at least partially (Fig. 5C–E). Together, the results suggest that SENP1 knockdown promotes SOCS2 expression through inhibiting JAK-STAT5 pathway.
SENP1 knockdown suppresses MCL growth in vivo
The in vivo effect of SENP1 on MCL growth was further evaluated in a xenograft nude mouse model. Stable Jeko-1 cells with shCon or shSENP1-3 were injected to nude mice to form subcutaneous tumors. The tumors formed by SENP1 knockdown Jeko-1 cells grew significantly slower than the tumors formed by Jeko-1 cells with shCon (Fig. 6A, B). Tumor growth rate was calculated by the equation of [tumor volume at day 21 - tumor volume at day 0]/21, and it was lower in the SENP1 knockdown group than in the control group (Fig. 6C). At day 21, tumors were isolated from the two group mice and then weighted. The tumors in the SENP1 knockdown group were significantly lighter (Fig. 6D). A significantly deregulated SENP1 expression was demonstrated in tumor specimens of the SENP1 knockdown group compared with control tumor specimens (Fig. 6E–G). Cell proliferation was significantly inhibited, cell apoptosis was significantly increased, and p-STAT5 protein expression was significantly down-regulated in the SENP1 knockdown group compared with the control group (Fig. 6H, I), which were consistent with the results in vitro.
Discussion
Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is an aggressive B-cell lymphoma which usually presents at a late stage and is associated with a poor prognosis [21]. While high response rates are observed with induction chemo-immunotherapy, relapse is unfortunately universal in daily clinical practice. So deep understanding of the pathogenesis of this disease will be helpful for designing proper targeted therapeutic regimen and thereafter improving the prognosis.
The results presented here provide several lines of evidence indicating that SENP1 is involved in the pathogenesis of MCL. First, we found that SENP1 was highly expressed in MCL through immunohistochemical staining of MCL samples and analysis of GEO database. Then, we found that knockdown of SENP1 can inhibit the proliferation and promote the apoptosis of MCL cell lines. We also found that SENP1 could regulate the activity of JAK-STAT5 pathway and then affect the expression of SOCS2. Finally, we demonstrated these findings in mouse xenograft model.
Protein function is tightly regulated by reversible posttranslational modifications to create an on/off state that is crucial for many biological processes. Many proteins are dynamically modified at multiple sites by different modifications. SUMOylation is a new protein post-translational modification discovered in recent years [22,23,24], which can directly regulate a number of cellular processes, including transcription, DNA repair, cell cycle, and signal transduction. The balance between SUMOylation and deSUMOylation is regulated by SENPs [25, 26]. The abnormality of SENPs is involved in the occurrence and progression of many tumors [10, 27, 28]. SENP1 is the most potent protease for regulating SUMOylation, which is a hot molecule in the studies on post-translational modifications. The abnormality of SENP1 has been proved to be closely related to the occurrence and development of a variety of tumors. On the basis of other researchers, our results demonstrated the role and potential mechanism of SENP1 in pathogenesis of MCL for the first time.
In our study, we demonstrated that SENP1 could regulate the phosphorylation of STAT5 by biochemical study in MCL cell lines. The interplay between phosphorylation and SUMOylation of neighboring sites has been shown to play an important role in regulating the transcriptional activity of several transcription factors [29, 30]. Previous reports also demonstrated that SENP1 can regulate the interplay between STAT5 SUMOylation and phosphorylation which participates in the early lymphoid development [11]. We postulated that in MCL, this might be also the molecular mechanism that SENP1 regulate phosphorylation of STAT5 since there are underling similarity between lymphoid progenitor cells and malignant lymphoma cells as reported in previous literatures.
Besides the potential direct regulation of SUMOylation and phosphorylation of STAT5, we also found that SENP1 could regulate the expression of SCOS2, and hypothesized an underlying signaling axis of SENP1/JAK-STAT5/SOCS2 in MCL cells. The molecular basis for the hypothesis of this signaling axis lies those previous studies have demonstrated that STAT5 could regulate the expression of SOCS2 in mRNA level and protein level. Sen et al. showed in their study that STAT5 inhibition could decrease SOCS2 expression in head and neck squamous carcinoma [31]. More important, Steven et al. directly demonstrated that STAT5 activation/inactivation could regulate expression of SOCS2 in lymphoma cells [32]. This mechanism was further verified by Hu et al. in dendritic cells. SOCS2 is usually being considered as a tumor suppressor in multiple cancers [33]. So, our results in combination with previous works demonstrated that highly expressed SENP1 could activate STAT5 through regulation the interplay between SUMOylation and phosphorylation in MCL cells, then, activated STAT5 could inhibit the expression of tumor suppressor SCOS2 (ref. [31, 33,34,35,36]). This signaling pathway could explain the mechanism of SENP1 in pathogenesis of MCL.
Taken together, we found SENP1 was upregulated in MCL patients and cell lines; knockdown of SENP1 inhibited MCL cell proliferation and promoted cell apoptosis, and also inhibited MCL tumor growth in mice; knockdown of SENP1 resulted in inhibition of JAK-STAT5 pathway and increased the expression of tumor suppressor SOCS2. These findings indicated SENP1 as a new player in the pathogenesis mechanism of MCL and also a potential therapeutic target for MCL patients. Specific inhibitors of SENP1 have also shown good in vitro therapeutic effects in a variety of tumors, which provides the possibility of clinical transformation for treatments targeting this molecule in MCL patients.
References
Maddocks K. Update on mantle cell lymphoma. Blood. 2018;132:1647–56.
Jain P, Wang M. Mantle cell lymphoma: 2019 update on the diagnosis, pathogenesis, prognostication, and management. Am J Hematol. 2019;94:710–25.
MartÃn-Garcia D, Navarro A, Valdés-Mas R, Clot G, Gutiérrez-Abril J, Prieto M, et al. CCND2 and CCND3 hijack immunoglobulin light-chain enhancers in cyclin D1(-) mantle cell lymphoma. Blood. 2019;133:940–51.
Kunz K, Piller T, Müller S. SUMO-specific proteases and isopeptidases of the SENP family at a glance. J Cell Sci. 2018;131:jcs211904.
Psakhye I, Castellucci F, Branzei D. SUMO-chain-regulated proteasomal degradation timing exemplified in DNA replication initiation. Mol Cell. 2019;76:632–45.
Seeler JS, Dejean A. SUMO and the robustness of cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2017;17:184–97.
Wilson VG. Introduction to sumoylation. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2017;963:1–12.
Yang Y, He Y, Wang X, Liang Z, He G, Zhang P, et al. Protein SUMOylation modification and its associations with disease. Open Biol. 2017;7:170167.
Chen CH, Chang CC, Lee TH, Luo M, Huang P, Liao PH, et al. SENP1 deSUMOylates and regulates Pin1 protein activity and cellular function. Cancer Res. 2017;77:2731.
Wan XQ, Cai JY, Zhu Y, Wang QX, Zhu HT, Ju HM, et al. SENP1 has an important role in lung development and influences the differentiation of alveolar type 2 cells. Int J Mol Med. 2019;43:371–81.
Van Nguyen T, Angkasekwinai P, Dou H, Lin FM, Lu LS, Cheng J, et al. SUMO-specific protease 1 is critical for early lymphoid development through regulation of STAT5 activation. Mol Cell. 2012;45:210–21.
Vishwamitra D, Curry CV, Shi P, Alkan S, Amin HM. SUMOylation confers posttranslational stability on NPM-ALK oncogenic protein. Neoplasia. 2015;17:742–54.
Xu Z, Chan HY, Lam WL, Lam KH, Lam LS, Ng TB, et al. SUMO proteases: redox regulation and biological consequences. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2009;11:1453–84.
Zhao Y, Wang Z, Zhang J, Zhou H. Identification of SENP1 inhibitors through in silico screening and rational drug design. Eur J Med Chem. 2016;122:178–184.
Sarangi P, Zhao X. SUMO-mediated regulation of DNA damage repair and responses. Trends Biochemical Sci. 2015;40:233–42.
Bawa-Khalfe T, Yang FM, Ritho J, Lin HK, Cheng J, Yeh ET. SENP1 regulates PTEN stability to dictate prostate cancer development. Oncotarget. 2017;8:17651–64.
Tian F, Li D, Chen J, Liu W, Cai L, Li J, et al. Aberrant expression of GATA binding protein 6 correlates with poor prognosis and promotes metastasis in cholangiocarcinoma. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49:1771–80.
Ma HY, Li Y, Yin HZ, Yin H, Qu YY, Xu QY. TNFAIP8 promotes cisplatin chemoresistance in triple-negative breast cancer by repressing p53-mediated miR-205-5p expression. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2020;22:640–56.
Damen JE, Wakao H, Miyajima A, Krosl J, Humphries RK, Cutler RL, et al. Tyrosine 343 in the erythropoietin receptor positively regulates erythropoietin-induced cell proliferation and Stat5 activation. EMBO J. 1995;15:5557–68.
Damen JE, Liu L, Rosten P, Humphries RK, Jefferson AB, Majerus PW, et al. The 145-kDa protein induced to associate with Shc by multiple cytokines is an inositol tetraphosphate and phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-triphosphate 5-phosphatase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93:1689–93.
Maddocks K. Building on BTK inhibition in MCL. Blood. 2021;137:861–2.
Zhang H, Huang D, Zhou J, Yue Y, Wang X. SUMOylation participates in induction of ischemic tolerance in mice. Brain Res Bull. 2019;147:159–64.
Talamillo A, Barroso-Gomila O, Giordano I, Ajuria L, Grillo M, Mayor U, et al. The role of SUMOylation during development. Biochem Soc Trans. 2020;48:463–78.
Zhang Y, Wang Y, Zhu C, Robertson ES, Cai Q. Role of SUMOylation in human oncogenic herpesvirus infection. Virus Res. 2020;283:197962.
Bialik P, Woźniak K. SUMO proteases as potential targets for cancer therapy. Postepy Hig Med Dosw. 2017;71:997–1004.
Andrade D, Velinder M, Singer J, Maese L, Bareyan D, Nguyen H, et al. SUMOylation regulates growth factor independence 1 in transcriptional control and hematopoiesis. Mol Cell Biol. 2016;36:1438–50.
Xu J, Sun HY, Xiao FJ, Wang H, Yang Y, Wang L, et al. SENP1 inhibition induces apoptosis and growth arrest of multiple myeloma cells through modulation of NF-kappaB signaling. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2015;460:409–15.
Yu T, Zuo Y, Cai R, Huang X, Wu S, Zhang C, et al. SENP1 regulates IFN-gamma-STAT1 signaling through STAT3-SOCS3 negative feedback loop. J Mol Cell Biol. 2017;9:144–53.
Liu H, Weng W, Guo R, Zhou J, Xue J, Zhong S, et al. Olig2 SUMOylation protects against genotoxic damage response by antagonizing p53 gene targeting. Cell Death Differ. 2020;27:3146–61.
Czuba LC, Hillgren KM, Swaan PW. Post-translational modifications of transporters. Pharm Ther. 2018;192:88–99.
Sen B, Peng S, Woods DM, Wistuba I, Bell D, El-Naggar AK, et al. STAT5A-mediated SOCS2 expression regulates Jak2 and STAT3 activity following c-Src inhibition in head and neck squamous carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18:127–39.
Ehrentraut S, Nagel S, Scherr ME, Schneider B, Quentmeier H, Geffers R, et al. t (8;9) (p22; p24)/PCM1-JAK2 activates SOCS2 and SOCS3 via STAT5. PLoS One. 2013;8:e53767.
Slattery ML, Lundgreen A, Kadlubar SA, Bondurant KL, Wolff RK. JAK/STAT/SOCS-signaling pathway and colon and rectal cancer. Mol Carcinog. 2013;52:155–66.
Greenhalgh CJ, Rico-Bautista E, Lorentzon M, Thaus AL, Morgan PO, Willson TA, et al. SOCS2 negatively regulates growth hormone action in vitro and in vivo. J Clin Investig. 2005;115:397–406.
Vitali C, Bassani C, Chiodoni C, Fellini E, Guarnotta C, Miotti S, et al. SOCS2 controls proliferation and stemness of hematopoietic cells under stress conditions and its deregulation marks unfavorable acute leukemias. Cancer Res. 2015;75:2387–99.
Wang F, Wang X, Li J, Lv P, Han M, Li L, et al. CircNOL10 suppresses breast cancer progression by sponging miR-767-5p to regulate SOCS2/JAK/STAT signaling. J Biomed Sci. 2021;28:4.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant number 81700185 and 81800172), the Nursery Talent Training Plan of Third Military Medical University (2017MPRC-01), and the Youth Talent Training Plan of Southwest Hospital of Third Military Medical University (SWH2018QNLC-01).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
XL and JC conceived and designed the experiments. YZ, YM, GW, and MX performed the experiments. CL, XH, and FT analyzed the data. XL and JC drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Edited by: Carlo Ganini
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, Y., Ma, Y., Wu, G. et al. SENP1 promotes MCL pathogenesis through regulating JAK-STAT5 pathway and SOCS2 expression. Cell Death Discov. 7, 192 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41420-021-00578-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41420-021-00578-x
This article is cited by
-
B-cell receptor signaling activity identifies patients with mantle cell lymphoma at higher risk of progression
Scientific Reports (2024)
-
Programmable protein expression using a genetically encoded m6A sensor
Nature Biotechnology (2024)
-
SENP3 Promotes Mantle Cell Lymphoma Development through Regulating Wnt10a Expression
Current Medical Science (2024)
-
Chicken pituitary transcriptomic responses to acute heat stress
Molecular Biology Reports (2023)
-
Dysregulated miR-29a-3p/PMP22 Modulates Schwann Cell Proliferation and Migration During Peripheral Nerve Regeneration
Molecular Neurobiology (2022)