Mutations in the B30.2 and the central helical scaffold domains of pyrin differentially affect inflammasome activation

Chirita, Daria; Bronnec, Pauline; Magnotti, Flora; Dalmon, Sarah; Martin, Amandine; Popoff, Michel; Gerfaud-Valentin, Mathieu; Sève, Pascal; Belot, Alexandre; Contis, Anne; Duquesne, Agnes; Nocturne, Gaetane; Lemelle, Irene; Georgin-Lavialle, Sophie; Boursier, Guilaine; Touitou, Isabelle; Jamilloux, Yvan; Henry, Thomas

doi:10.1038/s41419-023-05745-9

Download PDF

Article
Open access
Published: 25 March 2023

Mutations in the B30.2 and the central helical scaffold domains of pyrin differentially affect inflammasome activation

Daria Chirita¹,
Pauline Bronnec¹^na1,
Flora Magnotti¹^na1,
Sarah Dalmon¹,
Amandine Martin¹,
Michel Popoff ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-9305-8989²,
Mathieu Gerfaud-Valentin³,
Pascal Sève³,
Alexandre Belot^1,4,5,
Anne Contis⁶,
Agnes Duquesne⁵,
Gaetane Nocturne⁷,
Irene Lemelle⁸,
Sophie Georgin-Lavialle⁹,
Guilaine Boursier¹⁰,
Isabelle Touitou¹⁰,
Yvan Jamilloux^1,3,4 &
…
Thomas Henry ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-0687-8565¹

Cell Death & Disease volume 14, Article number: 213 (2023) Cite this article

1284 Accesses
6 Citations
1 Altmetric
Metrics details

Subjects

Abstract

Familial Mediterranean Fever (FMF) is the most common monogenic autoinflammatory disorder. FMF is caused by mutations in the MEFV gene, encoding pyrin, an inflammasome sensor. The best characterized pathogenic mutations associated with FMF cluster in exon 10. Yet, mutations have been described along the whole MEFV coding sequence. Exon 10 encodes the B30.2 domain of the pyrin protein, but the function of this human-specific domain remains unclear. Pyrin is an inflammasome sensor detecting RhoA GTPase inhibition following exposure to bacterial toxins such as TcdA. Here, we demonstrate that the B30.2 domain is dispensable for pyrin inflammasome activation in response to this toxin. Deletion of the B30.2 domain mimics the most typical FMF-associated mutation and confers spontaneous inflammasome activation in response to pyrin dephosphorylation. Our results indicate that the B30.2 domain is a negative regulator of the pyrin inflammasome that acts independently from and downstream of pyrin dephosphorylation. In addition, we identify the central helical scaffold (CHS) domain of pyrin, which lies immediately upstream of the B30.2 domain as a second regulatory domain. Mutations affecting the CHS domain mimic pathogenic mutations in the B30.2 domain and render the pyrin inflammasome activation under the sole control of the dephosphorylation. In addition, specific mutations in the CHS domain strongly increase the cell susceptibility to steroid catabolites, recently described to activate pyrin, in both a cell line model and in monocytes from genotype-selected FMF patients. Taken together, our work reveals the existence of two distinct regulatory regions at the C-terminus of the pyrin protein, that act in a distinct manner to regulate positively or negatively inflammasome activation. Furthermore, our results indicate that different mutations in pyrin regulatory domains have different functional impacts on the pyrin inflammasome which could contribute to the diversity of pyrin-associated autoinflammatory diseases.

FAAH served a key membrane-anchoring and stabilizing role for NLRP3 protein independently of the endocannabinoid system

Article 14 September 2022

Pathogenic NLRP3 mutants form constitutively active inflammasomes resulting in immune-metabolic limitation of IL-1β production

Article Open access 06 February 2024

NLRP3 licenses NLRP11 for inflammasome activation in human macrophages

Article Open access 27 May 2022

Introduction

Inflammasomes are multiprotein platforms assembled in the cytosol upon sensing of microbial infections, danger signals, or alteration of the cell homeostasis [1]. Inflammasome assembly leads to activation of the pro-inflammatory caspase-1, release of IL-1β and IL-18. In most cases, inflammasome activation leads to a fast cell death, termed pyroptosis which results from caspase-1-mediated cleavage of the pore-forming protein, gasdermin D. Inflammasomes participate in the innate immune defenses [2]. Inflammasomes are also involved in deleterious inflammatory processes. Particularly, mutations in genes encoding various inflammasome sensors are responsible for rare autoinflammatory diseases [3].

Pyrin is an inflammasome sensor acting as a guard of RhoA GTPases activity. Various bacterial toxins (such as Clostridioides difficile toxins A/B, TcdA/B) or effectors inhibit RhoA and trigger pyrin activation. The mechanisms linking RhoA inhibition to pyrin activation have been partly solved [4,5,6]. At steady state, RhoA activates its effectors including PKN1 and PKN2, two kinases that phosphorylate pyrin on two serine residues (S208 and S242). Phosphorylated pyrin interacts with 14-3-3 chaperone proteins that sequester pyrin away from the inflammasome adaptor, ASC [7,8,9]. Inhibition of RhoA and the ensuing deactivation of PKN1/2 leads to the PP2A-mediated dephosphorylation of pyrin [10]. Yet, this is not sufficient to trigger pyrin inflammasome activation. Another poorly understood mechanism controls pyrin inflammasome activation downstream of pyrin dephosphorylation in a microtubule-dependent manner [4, 7, 9]. In addition to RhoA inhibition, we and others recently identified steroid metabolites/analogues that can activate pyrin in a B30.2-dependent manner [11, 12].

Mutations in MEFV, the gene encoding pyrin, cause two autoinflammatory diseases, familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) and pyrin-associated autoinflammation with neutrophilic dermatosis (PAAND) [5, 13,14,15]. PAAND are caused by mutations affecting the phosphorylated serine or neighboring residues involved in the interaction with 14-3-3 proteins [5, 16]. The link between genotype and phenotype in FMF is more complex and less understood [17]. The prototypical FMF disease is a recessive disease due to bi-allelic mutations in MEFV exon 10, encoding pyrin B30.2 domain with the most frequent pathogenic mutation being p.M694V. FMF-associated MEFV mutations deregulate the pyrin inflammasome in monocytes by lifting the requirement for an intact microtubule network [9, 18], by invalidating pyrin regulatory mechanism 2 and leaving its activation under the sole control of its dephosphorylation [4]. These mutations result in pyrin inflammasome demonstrating a lower threshold of activation to specific pyrin agonists [19] and higher responses to LPS exposure [20]. Beside MEFV exon 10 mutations, a number of patients with a clinical diagnosis of FMF have MEFV mutations affecting other exons [17]. In addition, a number of these mutations results in FMF diseases with a dominant inheritance pattern [21, 22]. Most of these mutations are of unknown significance due to their rare frequency in the human population and due to lack of knowledge on the role of affected domain in pyrin regulation.

Here, we studied the role of the two C-terminal domains of pyrin in inflammasome activation in response to diverse stimuli to increase our knowledge on the regulatory mechanisms controlling pyrin inflammasome activation and the impact of FMF-associated mutations.

Results

B30.2 domain is dispensable for pyrin activation in response to TcdA

Pyrin is a multidomain protein containing a PYD domain, a linker domain containing the two critical phosphorylation residues and encoded by exon 2 (phosphorylated linker domain-PLD), a B-box domain, a central helical scaffold and a B30.2 domain. The role of each domain in pyrin inflammasome activation is still unclear. To answer this question, we used the human monocytic cell line, U937 and generated cell lines stably expressing doxycycline-inducible pyrin variants that lack one of the domains (Fig. 1A). U937 cells stably expressing the classical FMF-associated MEFV variant p.M694V were included as a control. The obtained monocytes were first stimulated with C. difficile toxin A (TcdA) and IL-18 release was monitored as an inflammasome readout (Fig. 1B). Cells expressing the pyrin variant lacking the B30.2 domain (ΔB30.2) responded to TcdA and secreted similar or even slightly higher IL-18 levels than cells expressing WT pyrin. In contrast, all the other domain deletions strongly decreased (coiled-coil domain deletion) or abolished IL-18 secretion in response to TcdA. Cells expressing the p.M694V pyrin variant secreted higher level of IL-18 than cells expressing WT pyrin in agreement with the hyper-reactivity of primary monocytes from FMF patients to clostridial toxins [19, 23]. Undifferentiated U937 cells are deficient for IL-1β production. U937 cells were thus differentiated into macrophages using PMA, and LPS was used to induce proIL-1β expression. PMA-differentiated U937 macrophages expressing ΔB30.2 pyrin variant released high levels of IL-1β (Fig. 1C) while all the other cell lines expressing deletion mutants led to minimal IL-1β secretion. No major differences in IL-18 or IL-1β secretion were observed following treatment with the NLRP3-specific stimulus LPS + nigericin (Fig. 1D, E). In the absence of doxycycline (i.e., of pyrin variants induction), TcdA did not trigger IL-1β or IL-18 release (Supplemental Fig. S1). These results show that the pyrin PLD, the B-box and the coiled-coil domains are specifically required for inflammasome cytokines secretion in response to the pyrin-specific stimulus TcdA. Furthermore, these results indicated that the B30.2 domain is dispensable for pyrin activation in response to TcdA.

**Fig. 1: B30.2 is dispensable for TcdA-mediated pyrin activation.**

Deletion of the B30.2 domain suppresses pyrin regulatory step 2

We have previously demonstrated that FMF-associated p.M694V/I or p.M680I mutations lead to the loss of a regulatory mechanism and to the exclusive control of the pyrin inflammasome by phosphorylation/dephosphorylation [4]. This defect can be functionally evidenced by treating cells with a PKC superfamily inhibitor UCN-01, that inhibits PKN1 and PKN2, leading to pyrin dephosphorylation [4]. Interestingly, ΔB30.2 pyrin expressing cells released high levels of IL-18 in response to UCN-01. As expected, cells expressing WT pyrin did not release IL-18 in contrast to cells expressing p.M694V variant (Fig. 2A). Similarly, upon differentiation into macrophages and treatment with UCN-01, only cells expressing p.M694V or ΔB30.2 MEFV variants led to a greater secretion of IL-1β than WT pyrin-expressing cells (Fig. 2B). In the absence of doxycycline, UCN-01 did not trigger IL-1β or IL-18 release (Supplemental Fig. S2A, B). These results suggest that deletion of the B30.2 domain abolishes the second pyrin regulatory mechanism to leave pyrin activation under the sole control of pyrin dephosphorylation.

**Fig. 2: Deletion of the B30.2 domain suppresses pyrin regulation step 2.**

To confirm this phenotype genetically without relying on a chemical inhibitor, we generated a U937 cell line invalidated for step 1 inhibitory mechanism (p.S08C/S242R phospho-null mutations) on a ΔB30.2 background. The phospho-null mutations combined with the p.M694V mutation (p.S208C/S242R/M694V) yield to a constitutively activated pyrin inflammasome [4]. The corresponding cell line was thus used as a positive control. Importantly, doxycycline-mediated induction of p.S208C/S242R/ΔB30.2 pyrin variant was sufficient to trigger cell death (Fig. 2C, E) and to promote GSDMD cleavage as suggested by the pattern of GSDMD immunodetection in the cell supernatant (Fig. 2D). The cell death was significantly blocked by the caspase-1 inhibitor, VX-765 (Supplemental Fig. S2C, D). Altogether, these results demonstrate the p.S208C/S242R/ΔB30.2 pyrin variant is constitutively activated and triggers pyroptosis upon expression. Due to the high doxycycline-induced cell death, these cell lines barely responded to UCN-01 stimulation in contrast to p.M694V or ΔB30.2 single mutants (Fig. 2C, F). Similarly, induction of the p.S208C/S242R/ΔB30.2 pyrin protein led to potent IL-18 secretion in the absence of any additional stimulus (Fig. 2G). These results indicate that deletion of the B30.2 domain fully invalidated pyrin regulatory mechanism 2 and, when combined with mutations invalidating pyrin regulatory mechanism 1, led to constitutive activation of this pyrin variant and spontaneous pyroptosis. Taken together these results demonstrate that the B30.2 domain of pyrin acts as a negative regulator of pyrin activation following TcdA treatment, UCN-01-mediated dephosphorylation or genetic invalidation of phosphorylation sites.

The B30.2 domain-mediated regulation acts downstream of pyrin dephosphorylation, upstream of ASC speck formation and, independently from caspase-1

The above results suggest that pyrin B30.2 domain-mediated regulation acts on pyrin regulatory mechanism 2 or downstream and not on the first regulatory mechanism associated with pyrin phosphorylation/dephosphorylation. Since the impact of FMF-associated, B30.2-affecting point mutations on phosphorylation is unclear [4, 6, 7, 9, 24], we investigated the impact of B30.2 deletion on pyrin dephosphorylation. Although at steady state, the ΔB30.2 pyrin protein was expressed at higher level than WT or p.M694V protein variants (possibly reflecting a greater stability), we could not detect any impact of the B30.2 deletion on UCN-01-mediated pyrin dephosphorylation (Fig. 3A, B). The B30.2-mediated regulation thus likely occurs downstream of pyrin dephosphorylation.

**Fig. 3: The B30.2-mediated regulation acts downstream of dephosphorylation, and independently of Caspase-1.**

To further map the B30.2-mediated regulation along the pyrin inflammasome activation process, we monitored ASC speck formation following UCN-01 treatment. As expected, and in line with the results presented above, UCN-01-mediated pyrin dephosphorylation was sufficient to trigger ASC speck formation in cells expressing p.M694V or ΔB30.2 pyrin variants (Fig. 3C, D). Cells expressing WT pyrin did not display any increase in ASC speck formation in the presence of UCN-01 (i.e., upon pyrin dephosphorylation). These results thus indicate that the B30.2-mediated regulation takes place downstream of pyrin dephosphorylation but upstream of ASC speck formation.

The B30.2 domain has been shown to interact with caspase-1 leading to the hypothesis that the B30.2 domain could regulate pyrin inflammasome through caspase-1 inhibition [25,26,27]. Yet, the above results demonstrate that the B30.2 domain regulates pyrin activation upstream of ASC speck formation suggesting that it may act independently of caspase-1. To validate this finding, we transduced the various pyrin mutants in caspase-1-deficient cells (Supplemental Fig. S3) and quantified ASC speck formation in response to UCN-01 (Fig. 3C, D). ASC speck formation was slightly higher in these cells likely due to the lack of caspase-1-mediated pyroptosis. Yet, in the absence of caspase-1, UCN-01 increased ASC speck formation in ΔB30.2 pyrin-expressing cells but not in WT pyrin-expressing cells clearly indicating that B30.2 negatively regulates pyrin inflammasome activation downstream of the dephosphorylation, upstream of ASC speck formation and independently of caspase-1. Since p.M694V mimics B30.2 deletion for all the above assays, these results suggest that the p.M694V mutation fully abolishes the negative regulatory function of this domain. This exon 10-encoded mutation may thus be classified as a loss-of-function mutation with regard to the functionality of the B30.2 domain (loss of the negative regulation) and thus a as gain of function in term of the full protein.

Mutations in the central helical scaffold phenocopy B30.2 pathogenic mutations in terms of UCN-01-mediated responses

Structural data on the C-terminal part of the pyrin protein indicates that the B30.2 domain interacts with another domain, termed the central helical scaffold which is made of coiled-coil α helices. This 272 amino acid-long domain (from 414 to 586), encoded by MEFV exons 3–8, has a function largely unknown and mutations affecting this domain mostly result in MEFV variants of unknown significance [28].

We thus generated five distinct U937 cell lines expressing MEFV variants of unknown significance identified in patients [21, 28, 29]. These variants (p.Q426R; p.H478Y; p.F479L; p.E552D; p.L559F) present mutations in various section of the CHS domain (Fig. 4A). All these constructs were expressed under a doxycycline-inducible promoter. Addition of doxycycline induced all these variants (Supplemental Fig. S4A) but did not trigger substantial cell death indicating that the corresponding proteins are not constitutively activated. We then assessed the impact of each of this variant on TcdA-triggered responses. Cells expressing the dominant p.H478Y variant behaved like cells expressing p.M694V variant and underwent cell death significantly faster than WT MEFV-expressing cells (Fig. 4B, C). A similar trend, although not statistically different from WT was observed for cells expressing p.Q426R, p.F479L, or p.L559F variants. Cells expressing p.E552D MEFV variant had a milder and more variable phenotype than all the other cell lines. LPS + nigericin-mediated cell death was similar in all the cell lines (with some kinetics differences potentially linked to a cross-talk between pyrin and NLRP3 inflammasomes [20]) (Supplemental Fig. S4B–D). IL-1β quantification led to the same conclusions with TcdA-mediated responses being statistically greater in cells expressing p.H478Y and p.M694V MEFV variants (Fig. 4D). Thus, in agreement with Honda and colleagues [23], we observed that different mutations within MEFV, including p.M694V, lead to different level of enhancement of TcdA-triggered responses. This suggests that different CHS-targeting mutations may cause different level of deregulation of the pyrin inflammasome.

**Fig. 4: Mutations in the Central Helical Scaffold (CHS) domain phenocopy the classical FMF-associated B30.2 mutation - p.M694V - in terms of UCN-01 and TcdA-mediated responses.**

To confirm this, we switched to UCN-01, which better discriminates whether the variants behave like the prototypical p.M694V variant [4, 23, 30]. Three of these variants-expressing cell lines (p.Q426R, p.H478Y and p.F479L) responded to UCN-01 and underwent a rapid cell death, previously characterized as a pyroptotic cell death (Fig. 4E, F) and associated with the appearance of cleaved Caspase-1 and cleaved GSDMD in the cell supernatant (Fig. 5D). This inflammasome response was confirmed by quantifying IL-18 secretion (Fig. 4G). To genetically strengthen these findings, the 5 CHS mutations were combined to p.S208C/p.S242R mutations. These results (Fig. 4H–J) confirmed the major phenotype of p.Q426R, p.H478Y (and as expected p.M694V). p.F479L, also caused substantial deregulation of the pyrin inflammasome responses when combined to p.S208C/p.S242R mutations although the difference with WT pyrin was not statistically significant in all the assays.

**Fig. 5: Specific mutations in the CHS domain render pyrin highly sensitive to steroid catabolites.**

Overall, these results indicate that specific CHS-affecting mutations mimic pathogenic FMF mutations affecting the B30.2 domain (e.g., p.M694V) and activate the pyrin inflammasome following dephosphorylation. Based on these cellular phenotypes, they should thus be qualified as pathogenic mutations. Interestingly, these assays clearly indicate that the different mutations have different quantitative impact on the pyrin inflammasome mirroring the clinical FMF presentations that rank from mild to severe [17].

Distinct mutations in the CHS domain render pyrin highly susceptible to low doses of steroid catabolites

We recently identified that the pyrin inflammasome can be activated by pregnanolone and etiocholanolone, two catabolites from the steroid hormones, progesterone and testosterone. This response is dependent on the B30.2 and on the CHS domains [12]. We thus wondered whether the identified pathogenic mutations also affected the response to steroid catabolites. U937 cell lines expressing the different MEFV variants were thus treated with increasing concentrations of pregnanolone and the concentration required to trigger 50% cell death (EC50) was determined. Strikingly, two mutations, p.Q426R and p.F479L, decreased pregnanolone EC50 by >50-fold (Fig. 5A). Indeed, 2 μM of pregnanolone killed 50% of p.F479L or p.Q426R-expressing cells (EC50 = 1.9 ± 2.6 μM; n = 5 and EC50 = 2.1 ± 3.6 μM; n = 6, respectively), while EC50 for WT MEFV-expressing cells was 110 ± 27 μM; (n = 7) (Fig. 5B). Similar differences were observed in response to etiocholanolone (Supplemental Fig. S5A, B) although not as drastic potentially due to the lower ability of etiocholanolone to activate the pyrin inflammasome. Cell death in all the pyrin variant-expressing cell lines was blocked by the caspase-1 inhibitor VX-765 (Fig. 5C and Supplemental Fig. S5D, E). As previously described [12], cells expressing p.M694V did not demonstrate a substantial reduction in EC50. Surprisingly, cells expressing p.H478Y variant were largely resistant to etiocholanolone (Supplemental Fig. S5A, B) and to a lower extent to pregnanolone (Fig. 5A, B). Similarly, robust secretion of cleaved caspase-1 and of cleaved GSDMD were observed in the supernatant of cell lines expressing p.Q426R and p.F479L pyrin variants treated with a low concentration of pregnanolone (6 μM, Fig. 5D). In contrast, this pregnanolone dose did not elicit detectable maturation of caspase-1 or of GSDMD in p.H478Y pyrin-expressing cells. These results suggest that mutations affecting the CHS have divergent effect on the steroid catabolites response. The same conclusions were reached when investigating the ability of pregnanolone to trigger IL-1β secretion. Indeed, IL-1β secretion rapidly decreased with decreasing doses of pregnanolone in WT or p.H478Y MEFV-expressing U937 cells while it was maintained until 0.2 μM in cell lines expressing p.Q426R or p.F479L MEFV variants (Supplemental Fig. S5F).

To get insights into the molecular mechanism, we investigated pyrin S242 phosphorylation at steady state and upon exposure to low (6 μM) or high (50 μM) doses of pregnanolone. In contrast to the high doses, low doses of pregnanolone do not promote WT pyrin dephosphorylation [12]. No major differences were seen in terms of steady state phosphorylation levels in the different cell lines (Fig. 5E). Yet, low doses of pregnanolone significantly triggered dephosphorylation of pyrin in cells expressing p.Q426R or p.F479L MEFV variants (Fig. 5E). In agreement with the high doses required to trigger pyrin activation in WT cells, pyrin dephosphorylation was only observed at 50 μM in the other cell lines. Similarly, UCN-01 triggered dephosphorylation in all the cell lines.

Altogether, these data indicate that distinct CHS mutations trigger distinct pyrin inflammasome deregulation. In particular, three mutations (p.Q426R, p.H478Y, p.F479L) behaved as the prototypical FMF exon 10 mutation p.M694V and rendered the pyrin inflammasome controlled only by dephosphorylation. Interestingly, only two of these (p.Q426R and p.F479L) had a further deregulation of pyrin inflammasome responses with an exquisite sensitivity to steroid catabolites.

Primary human monocytes from patients presenting the p.F479L mutation demonstrate pyrin inflammasome response to low doses of steroid catabolites

p.Q426R and p.F479L are rare to very rare mutations (Supplemental Fig. S6A). One FMF patient with p.Q426R heterozygous mutation was identified but we could not get neither her/his clinical information nor primary cells from this patient. Eight FMF patients with the p.F479L mutation were identified in six French clinical centers (Supplemental Table S1). The p.E167D mutation co-segregates with the p.F479L mutation in a complex allele (Supplemental Fig. S6B) and was identified in at least 7 out of 8 patients. All patients were compound heterozygous patients with the p.V726 A mutation. U937 cells expressing p.E167D MEFV variant showed similar phenotypes as WT MEFV-expressing cells (Supplemental Fig. S6C–P) suggesting that this variant is likely a benign polymorphism and does not affect in a substantial way WT or p.F479L pyrin responses. p.V726A variant is usually associated with incomplete penetrance or milder forms of the disease [17]. Yet, all the patients displayed typical FMF disease (Supplemental Table S1) strongly suggesting that, in agreement with the above results and with previous studies [23, 30], the p.F479L MEFV variant is pathogenic. Indeed, primary monocytes from patients presenting the p.F479L mutation responded to UCN-01 by secreting IL-1β (Fig. 6A). As expected, monocytes from healthy donors did not demonstrate substantial production of IL-1β in response to UCN-01 while their pyrin inflammasome could be triggered by TcdB (Fig. 6A). We then investigated whether primary monocytes from these patients responded to low doses of the steroid catabolites pregnanolone and etiocholanolone (6 μM and 12 μM, respectively). As observed with U937 cells, primary monocytes bearing the p.F479L mutation released IL-1β in response to low doses of pregnanolone and etiocholanolone (Fig. 6A) while monocytes from HD did not. A large difference in IL-1β secretion between monocytes from HD and patient bearing the p.F479L was also seen at higher doses of steroid catabolites (50 and 100 μM) although at these doses, inflammasome activation was observed in primary monocytes from HD (Fig. 6A). Similar results were observed when investigating primary monocytes cell death in real time (Fig. 6B–J). Indeed, primary monocytes from p.F479L-expressing patients died in response to low doses of pregnanolone and etiocholanolone (Fig. 6B, E, J) in contrast to monocytes from HD. At higher doses of steroid catabolites, cell death was more extensive in primary monocytes from p.F479L-expressing patients than in monocytes from HD (Fig. 6C, F, J). As observed with IL-1β secretion (Fig. 6A), these differences were largely ablated in the presence of both steroid catabolites and UCN-01 (Fig. 6D, G, J) suggesting that the p.F479L mutation may affect a coupling mechanism between low doses of steroid catabolites and dephosphorylation. As previously described [12], FMF patients with MEFV mutations in exon 10 did not respond to low doses of etiocholanolone or pregnanolone but presented a moderate increase response to high doses of steroid catabolites (Fig. 6A–J).

**Fig. 6: Primary human monocytes from patients presenting the p.F479L mutation demonstrated pyrin inflammasome activation in response to low doses of steroid catabolites.**

Altogether, these results validate, in primary patients bearing the p.F479L mutation, that specific FMF-associated MEFV mutations render pyrin inflammasome sensitive to low doses of steroid catabolites.

Discussion

In contrast to other inflammasome sensors such as NLRP3 [31,32,33], the regulation of pyrin remains unclear. Except for the phosphorylated linker domain, the roles of pyrin domains in the regulation of inflammasome activation are still largely unknown. The B30.2 domain has long been hypothesized to negatively regulate human pyrin. Yet, the proposed mechanisms are unclear and include interaction of the B30.2 with NLRP3 to mediate autophagy-mediated degradation [34], with PKN1 to modulate pyrin phosphorylation [6] or with caspase-1 [25, 26] or IL-1β [35, 36] to directly regulate these inflammasome mediators. Here, we clearly demonstrate that the B30.2 domain is dispensable for pyrin inflammasome response in response to TcdA. This result is fully in line with results obtained in mice in which pyrin is naturally devoid of the B30.2 domain [37] and with recent data obtained in U937 cells infected with Y. pestis [24]. Not only, the B30.2 domain is dispensable, but our data show that deletion of this domain renders the activation of the pyrin inflammasome under the sole regulation of the PKC superfamily kinases, PKN1/2. This observation thus suggests that the B30.2 domain negatively control pyrin inflammasome activation downstream of the dephosphorylation. Importantly, we observed the B30.2-mediated regulation by monitoring ASC speck formation in CASP1^KO cells. Altogether, these results demonstrate that the B30.2 regulate pyrin inflammasome activation downstream of the dephosphorylation and upstream of ASC speck formation hence regulating the step 2 of pyrin inflammasome cascade.

Surprisingly, in response to TcdA, we did not observe higher IL-1β or IL-18 responses in ΔB30.2-MEFV-expressing cells compared to WT MEFV-expressing cells while p.M694V MEFV-expressing cells showed higher responses. Thus, while the B30.2 deletion mimics p.M694V mutation in terms of loss of step 2 regulation, the B30.2 domain may also, at least when mutated in position p.M694V, positively regulate inflammasome activation.

The B30.2 domain sits onto a flexible coiled-coil domain that has been termed the Central Helical Scaffold (CHS). In the butyrophilin BTN31A1 protein that displays a similar domain sequence, the coiled-coil domain is implicated in the signal transduction following binding of a small ligand in the BTN3A1 B30.2 cavity. We thus made the hypothesis that the pyrin CHS domain may act together with the B30.2 domain to regulate pyrin inflammasome activation. In agreement with this hypothesis, several mutations along the CHS domains mimic p.M694V mutations and renders the pyrin inflammasome activation under the sole control of the dephosphorylation. In WT pyrin, we hypothesize that the CHS domain may transduce a negative signal initiated by the B30.2 domain. In this model, pyrin activation would be negatively regulated by these two C-terminal domains acting together to control pyrin step 2. More molecular characterization of pyrin protein and its conformational changes remains to be performed to assess the validity of this model.

While most of the research on pyrin has focused on the B30.2 domain, our results indicate that the CHS domain is a central regulator of pyrin inflammasome. Furthermore, this study and others [21, 23] demonstrate that various mutations in the CHS are pathogenic and validate that MEFV mutations outside exon 10 (i.e., affecting other domains than the B30.2 domain) can cause FMF. These results thus highlight the need to sequence the whole MEFV gene to genetically validate (or not) a clinical diagnosis of FMF.

Of particular interest, different mutations within the CHS domain have different impact on the functionality of the pyrin inflammasome in response to steroid catabolites. Particularly, two mutations (p.Q426R and p.F479L) decrease by a ≈ 50-fold the sensitivity of cells expressing pyrin to pregnanolone. Interestingly, these two mutations maps to amino-acids at the interface between two to three distinct alpha helices from two different CHS molecules within the CHS-B30.2 dimer [38]. Modifications of the CHS conformation may allow to switch the B30.2 domain from a closed to an open state [38] and the two identified mutations may thus lock or facilitate this switch.

We were not able to obtain neither primary cells nor clinical information from the single patient bearing the p.Q426R mutation described so far [28]. In contrast, we recruited 8 patients from six independent families bearing the p.F479L mutation. 7 out of 8 of these patients were (i) presenting a complex p.E167D/p.F479L allele (2) compound heterozygotes with p.V726A as the second mutation. Of note the p.V726A mutation is usually associated with mild form of FMF [17]. Except for one patient describing recurrent inflammatory flares 7 days post-menstruations, the practitioners following these patients did not report any inflammatory flares related to life events potentially associated with an increase in steroid sex hormones catabolism (puberty, pregnancy…). Yet, for 6 out of 8 patients, arthralgia/ osteoarticular manifestations were mentioned, a clinical feature previously reported in 43% of pediatric patients with two high penetrance MEFV mutations (p.M680I, p. M694I, p.M694V) [39]. Whether a steroid catabolite may be responsible for this clinical manifestation is unclear.

Altogether, this study demonstrates that in the C-terminus of pyrin, the B30.2 and the CHS domains regulate pyrin activation in particular by negatively regulating the step 2. MEFV mutations affecting the serine residues or the B30.2 domain lead to two different diseases (PAAND and FMF). Here, we identified that different mutations affecting the CHS domain differentially affect the pyrin inflammasome response and potentially the clinical presentation of the patients. Thus, our study strengthens the concept of a spectrum of MEFV mutations, affecting differently the regulation mechanisms of the pyrin protein and leading to Pyrin-Associated Autoinflammatory Diseases [40] with varying degrees of severity.

Materials and methods

Mutagenesis and cell line generation

U937 cell lines expressing the different MEFV variants were generated as described in Magnotti et al, 2019 [4]. Briefly, MEFV variants were generated by site-directed mutagenesis using the QuickChange II Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit (Agilent) or the Q5 Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit (NEB) with primers listed in the Supplemental Table S2. The variants were cloned into the GFP-expressing lentiviral vector pINDUCER21 [41] under a doxycycline-inducible promoter through a 3×Flag derivative of pENTR1A vector (Invitrogen). The resulting plasmids were used to produce lentiviruses in HEK293 cells. The human myeloid cell line U937 (CelluloNet, Lyon, France) was transduced with the obtained lentiviruses. Transduced cells sorted based on GFP expression on an Aria cell sorter. U937 cells were maintained in RPMI 1640 medium with glutaMAX_I supplemented with 10% FCS, 1% Hepes, 1% Sodium Pyruvate, 2mM L-glutamate, 1% PSA. CASP1^KO cell lines were generated using the CRISPR/Cas9 method as previously described [42]. HEK293T and U937 cells were tested negative for mycoplasma contamination in April 2021. The cell lines have not been authenticated.

Cytokine detection and cell death assay

For real time cell death analysis, U937 cells were seeded at 5*10⁴ cells per well in a black 96-well plate (Costar, Corning) and treated with doxycycline (1 µg/mL) overnight. Then, the cells were stimulated with relevant compounds, propidium iodide (PI) (5 µg/mL final) was added and fluorescence measurement was immediately started and performed every 5 or 15 min for 3–16 h on a thermostatic fluorimeter (Tecan) with excitation wavelength of 535 nm (bandwidth 15 nm) and emission wavelength 635 nm (bandwidth 15 nm). The obtained results were normalized using PI incorporation values in cells treated with Triton-X100 1% v/v as 100% cell death.

To assess IL-18 secretion, U937 cells were seeded at 2*10⁵ cells per well of a 96-well plate and treated with doxycycline (1 µg/mL) overnight. The appropriate inflammasome stimuli were added and the cells were incubated at 37 °C with 5% CO₂ for 3 h. The supernatant was collected, and IL-18 concentration was determined by ELISA with anti-human IL-18 antibody (4 µg/ml, #D044-3, MBL, Woburn, MA, USA) as capture antibody and anti-human IL-18 antibody coupled with biotin (20 ng/mL, #D045-6, MBL) as detection antibody.

To assess IL-1β secretion U937 cells were seeded at 5*10⁴ cells per well of a 96-well plate and treated with 100 ng/mL of phorbol 12-myristate 12-acetate (PMA, Invitrogen) for 3 h, then washed and incubated with 1 µg/mL doxycycline overnight. The appropriate inflammasome stimuli were added and the cells were incubated at 37 °C with 5% CO₂ for 3 h. The supernatant was collected and the concentration in IL-1β was determined by ELISA (R&D Systems).

In each of these experiments three technical replicates were performed. The inflammasome stimuli used were: UCN-01 (12.5 µM, Sigma) without priming, TcdA at 1 µg/ml without priming and Nigericin (50 µg/mL, Invivogen) following 3 h priming with LPS (1 µg/mL, Invivogen). TcdA was purified from Clostridioides difficile VPI10463 strain, as previously described [43, 44].

Immunoprecipitation and immunoblot analysis

To examine pyrin phosphorylation, U937 cells were seeded 3*10⁶ per condition in a 6-well plate and incubated with doxycycline (1 µg/mL) overnight at 37 °C with 5% CO2. The cells were then either treated or not with Carfilizomib (100 ng/mL, Selleckchem) for 30 min, then UCN-01 (12.5 µM, Sigma) for 15 min.

Once collected, the cells were washed in cold PBS and lysed in Tris HCl pH 7.0 25 mM, NaCl 150 mM, EDTA 1 mM, Igepal CA-630 (NP40) 0.1% supplemented with Sodium fluoride (phosphatase inhibitor, Sigma, S7920) at 10 μmM and, cOmplete™ EDTA-free Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (Roche 05056489001). Flag-pyrin was immunoprecipitated with Anti-FLAG® M2 Magnetic Beads (Sigma, M8823) saturated with BSA (2 mg/mL, Serva) for 2 h at 4 °C, washed in lysis buffer and denatured at 95 °C for 5 min. For Caspase-1 and GSDMD immunodetection, cells were stimulated in OptiMEM without serum for 90 min (UCN-01) to 3 h (pregnanolone). Proteins in the supernatant were precipitated by methanol-chloroform precipitation. Per lane, the supernatant from 5.10⁵ cells or 20 μg of protein lysate was loaded. Proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE on precast 4–15% acrylamide gels (Bio-Rad) and then transferred to Transblot Turbo Midi-size PVDF membranes (Bio-Rad). For immunoblotting the following antibodies were used: mouse anti-Flag (Sigma Aldrich, clone M2, 1:1000), rabbit anti-Pyrin (Adipogen, AL196, 1:1,000), rabbit anti-phosphoS241 Pyrin (Abcam, ab200420, 1:1,000), mouse anti-V5 tag (Invitrogen, 37–7500, 1:1,000), rabbit anti-Caspase-1 (#3866 S, Cell signaling, 1:1,000), rabbit anti-GSDMD (#HPA044487, Sigma, 1:1,000), mouse anti-βActin (Sigma Aldrich, clone C4, MAB1501, 1:5,000) and anti-mouse IgG (Promega, W4021, 1:3,000) and anti-rabbit IgG (Sigma, A0545, 1:3,000).

Figure panel 2D was performed using an automated capillary-based Western blot system (Jess, Biotechne) using a 12–230 KDa separation module (SM-W004, Biotechne). 3 μL of cell lysate at 2 mg/mL was loaded in each well. For cell supernatant samples, the medium was changed at 3 h post-doxycycline addition to optiMEM. 6 h later (9 h post-doxycycline addition), supernatant was collected and precipitated by chloroform-methanol. 3 μL of cell supernatant -corresponding to 3.5 10⁴ cells- was loaded in each well. GSDMD antibody (#HPA044487, Sigma) was multiplexed with actin antibody (#MAB1501, Sigma), both used at 1:50 dilution and detected respectively in chemiluminescence and fluorescence using anti-rabbit HRP antibody (#DM-001, Biotechne) and anti-Mouse NIR antibody (#DM-009, Biotechne).

Uncropped Western blot images are available in the Supplemental material.

Immunofluorescence

To quantify ASC specks, U937 cells were seeded 2*10⁵ per condition in a 96-well V-bottom plate and incubated with or without doxycycline (1 µg/mL) overnight. Then the cells were additionally treated or not with UCN-01 12.5 µM for 25 min, washed with PBS, and fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde (15 min at 37 °C). The cells were washed once in PBS and transferred onto glass slides with cytospin, then permeabilized with Triton-X100 0.1%v/v in PBS. The samples were blocked in PBS, BSA (3%, Serva), Triton X-100 (1%, Sigma), stained with anti-ASC (Santa Cruz, sc22514R, 4 µg/mL in blocking buffer) for 1 h at room temperature, then with donkey anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor 594 (Life Technologies, A21207, 10 µg/mL), followed by DAPI (100 ng/ml). Coverslips were mounted using mowiol.

Quantification and statistical analysis

Normality was verified using D’Agostino & Person omnibus normality test, Shapiro–Wilk normality test or Kolmogorov–Smirnov test with Dallal-Wilkinson-Lille for P value if the number of values was too small for the former test. Gaussian distribution was assumed for technical triplicates. Normal unmatched values were analyzed with one-way ANOVA, with Dunnett’s correction for multiple comparisons. Unmatched values, for which normality could not be verified, were analyzed using Kruskal–Wallis analysis with Dunn’s correction. Equal variance was not assumed. Prism 7 (GraphPad) was used for statistical analyses. The statistical analyses and parameters for each experiment are listed in the corresponding figure legends.

Data availability

Further information and requests for resources and reagents should be directed to the lead contact, TH (thomas.henry@inserm.fr). All unique/sable reagents generated in this study are available from the lead contact without restriction. Raw data (full Western blot images and Raw data) have been deposited at Mendeley (doi: 10.17632/22m9h3243f.1). This paper does not report original code. Any additional information required to reanalyze the data reported in this paper is available from the lead contact upon request.

References

Martinon F, Burns K, Tschopp J. The inflammasome: a molecular platform triggering activation of inflammatory caspases and processing of proIL-beta. Mol Cell. 2002;10:417–26.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Broz P, Monack DM. Molecular mechanisms of inflammasome activation during microbial infections. Immunol Rev. 2011;243:174–90.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Manthiram K, Zhou Q, Aksentijevich I, Kastner DL. The monogenic autoinflammatory diseases define new pathways in human innate immunity and inflammation. Nat Immunol. 2017;18:832–42.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Magnotti F, Lefeuvre L, Benezech S, Malsot T, Waeckel L, Martin A, et al. Pyrin dephosphorylation is sufficient to trigger inflammasome activation in familial Mediterranean fever patients. EMBO Mol Med. 2019;11:e10547.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Masters SL, Lagou V, Jeru I, Baker PJ, Van Eyck L, Parry DA, et al. Familial autoinflammation with neutrophilic dermatosis reveals a regulatory mechanism of pyrin activation. Sci Transl Med. 2016;8:332ra45.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Park YH, Wood G, Kastner DL, Chae JJ. Pyrin inflammasome activation and RhoA signaling in the autoinflammatory diseases FMF and HIDS. Nat Immunol. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1038/ni.3457
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Gao W, Yang J, Liu W, Wang Y, Shao F. Site-specific phosphorylation and microtubule dynamics control Pyrin inflammasome activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016;113:E4857–4866.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Jeru I, Papin S, L’hoste S, Duquesnoy P, Cazeneuve C, Camonis J, et al. Interaction of pyrin with 14.3.3 in an isoform-specific and phosphorylation-dependent manner regulates its translocation to the nucleus. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52:1848–57.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Van Gorp H, Saavedra PHV, de Vasconcelos NM, Van Opdenbosch N, Vande Walle L, Matusiak M, et al. Familial Mediterranean fever mutations lift the obligatory requirement for microtubules in Pyrin inflammasome activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1613156113
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Malik HS, Loeven NA, Delgado JM, Kettenbach AN, Bliska JB. Phosphoprotein Phosphatase Activity Positively Regulates Oligomeric Pyrin to Trigger Inflammasome Assembly in Response to Bacterial Effectors and Toxins that Inactivate RhoA in Macrophages. bioRxiv. 2022: 2022.03.23.485108.
Alimov I, Menon S, Cochran N, Maher R, Wang Q, Alford J, et al. Bile acid analogues are activators of pyrin inflammasome. J Biol Chem. 2019;294:3359–66.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Magnotti F, Chirita D, Dalmon S, Martin A, Bronnec P, Sousa J, et al. Steroid hormone catabolites activate the pyrin inflammasome through a non-canonical mechanism. Cell Rep. 2022;41:111472.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Jamilloux Y, Magnotti F, Belot A, Henry T. The pyrin inflammasome: from sensing RhoA GTPases-inhibiting toxins to triggering autoinflammatory syndromes. Pathog Dis. 2018; 76. https://doi.org/10.1093/femspd/fty020
The International FMF Consortium. Ancient Missense Mutations in a New Member of the RoRet Gene Family Are Likely to Cause Familial Mediterranean Fever. Cell. 1997;90:797–807.
Article Google Scholar
A candidate gene for familial Mediterranean fever. The French FMF Consortium. Nat Genet. 1997;17:25–31.
Google Scholar
Moghaddas F, Llamas R, De Nardo D, Martinez-Banaclocha H, Martinez-Garcia JJ, Mesa-del-Castillo P, et al. A novel Pyrin-Associated Autoinflammation with Neutrophilic Dermatosis mutation further defines 14-3-3 binding of pyrin and distinction to Familial Mediterranean Fever. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-211473
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Touitou I. The spectrum of Familial Mediterranean Fever (FMF) mutations. Eur J Hum Genet. 2001;9:473–83.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Shiba T, Tanaka T, Ida H, Watanabe M, Nakaseko H, Osawa M, et al. Functional evaluation of the pathological significance of MEFV variants using induced pluripotent stem cell-derived macrophages. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019;144:1438–41.e12.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Jamilloux Y, Lefeuvre L, Magnotti F, Martin A, Benezech S, Allatif O, et al. Familial Mediterranean fever mutations are hypermorphic mutations that specifically decrease the activation threshold of the Pyrin inflammasome. Rheumatol (Oxf). 2018;57:100–11.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Omenetti A, Carta S, Delfino L, Martini A, Gattorno M, Rubartelli A. Increased NLRP3-dependent interleukin 1beta secretion in patients with familial Mediterranean fever: correlation with MEFV genotype. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73:462–9.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Aldea A, Campistol JM, Arostegui JI, Rius J, Maso M, Vives J, et al. A severe autosomal-dominant periodic inflammatory disorder with renal AA amyloidosis and colchicine resistance associated to the MEFV H478Y variant in a Spanish kindred: an unusual familial Mediterranean fever phenotype or another MEFV-associated periodic inflammatory disorder? Am J Med Genet A. 2004;124A:67–73.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Rowczenio DM, Youngstein T, Trojer H, Omoyinmi E, Baginska A, Brogan P, et al. British kindred with dominant FMF associated with high incidence of AA amyloidosis caused by novel MEFV variant, and a review of the literature. Rheumatol (Oxf). 2020;59:554–8.
CAS Google Scholar
Honda Y, Maeda Y, Izawa K, Shiba T, Tanaka T, Nakaseko H, et al. Rapid Flow Cytometry-Based Assay for the Functional Classification of MEFV Variants. J Clin Immunol. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10875-021-01021-7
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Park YH, Remmers EF, Lee W, Ombrello AK, Chung LK, Shilei Z, et al. Ancient familial Mediterranean fever mutations in human pyrin and resistance to Yersinia pestis. Nat Immunol. 2020;21:857–67.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Arakelov G, Arakelov V, Nazaryan K. Complex formation dynamics of native and mutated pyrin’s B30.2 domain with caspase-1. Proteins. 2018;86:676–83.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Chae JJ, Wood G, Masters SL, Richard K, Park G, Smith BJ, et al. The B30.2 domain of pyrin, the familial Mediterranean fever protein, interacts directly with caspase-1 to modulate IL-1β production. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:9982.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Fayez AG, Eldeen GN, Zarouk WA, Hamed K, Ramadan A, Foda BM, et al. Dynamic disequilibrium-based pathogenicity model in mutated pyrin’s B30.2 domain-Casp1/p20 complex. J Genet Eng Biotechnol. 2022;20:31.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Milhavet F, Cuisset L, Hoffman HM, Slim R, El-Shanti H, Aksentijevich I, et al. The infevers autoinflammatory mutation online registry: update with new genes and functions. Hum Mutat. 2008;29:803–8.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Bernot A, da Silva C, Petit JL, Cruaud C, Caloustian C, Castet V, et al. Non-founder mutations in the MEFV gene establish this gene as the cause of familial Mediterranean fever (FMF). Hum Mol Genet. 1998;7:1317–25.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Magnotti F, Malsot T, Georgin-Lavialle S, Abbas F, Martin A, Belot A, et al. Fast diagnostic test for familial Mediterranean fever based on a kinase inhibitor. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-218366
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Bauernfeind FG, Horvath G, Stutz A, Alnemri ES, MacDonald K, Speert D, et al. Cutting edge: NF-kappaB activating pattern recognition and cytokine receptors license NLRP3 inflammasome activation by regulating NLRP3 expression. J Immunol. 2009;183:787–91.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Py BF, Kim M-S, Vakifahmetoglu-Norberg H, Yuan J. Deubiquitination of NLRP3 by BRCC3 critically regulates inflammasome activity. Mol Cell. 2013;49:331–8.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Stutz A, Kolbe C-C, Stahl R, Horvath GL, Franklin BS, van Ray O, et al. NLRP3 inflammasome assembly is regulated by phosphorylation of the pyrin domain. J Exp Med. 2017;214:1725–36.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kimura T, Jain A, Choi SW, Mandell MA, Schroder K, Johansen T, et al. TRIM-mediated precision autophagy targets cytoplasmic regulators of innate immunity. J Cell Biol. 2015;210:973–89.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Papin S, Cuenin S, Agostini L, Martinon F, Werner S, Beer HD, et al. The SPRY domain of Pyrin, mutated in familial Mediterranean fever patients, interacts with inflammasome components and inhibits proIL-1beta processing. Cell Death Differ. 2007;14:1457–66.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Weinert C, Grutter C, Roschitzki-Voser H, Mittl PRE, Grutter MG. The crystal structure of human pyrin b30.2 domain: implications for mutations associated with familial Mediterranean fever. J Mol Biol. 2009;394:226–36.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Xu H, Yang J, Gao W, Li L, Li P, Zhang L, et al. Innate immune sensing of bacterial modifications of Rho GTPases by the Pyrin inflammasome. Nature. 2014;513:237–41.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Weinert C, Morger D, Djekic A, Grutter MG, Mittl PRE. Crystal structure of TRIM20 C-terminal coiled-coil/B30.2 fragment: implications for the recognition of higher order oligomers. Sci Rep. 2015;5:10819.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Federici S, Calcagno G, Finetti M, Gallizzi R, Meini A, Vitale A, et al. Clinical impact of MEFV mutations in children with periodic fever in a prevalent western European Caucasian population. Ann Rheum Dis. 2012;71:1961–5.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Boursier G, Hentgen V, Sarrabay G, Kone-Paut I, Touitou I. The Changing Concepts Regarding the Mediterranean Fever Gene: Toward a Spectrum of Pyrin-Associated Autoinflammatory Diseases with Variable Heredity. J Pediatr. 2019;209:12–16.e1.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Meerbrey KL, Hu G, Kessler JD, Roarty K, Li MZ, Fang JE, et al. The pINDUCER lentiviral toolkit for inducible RNA interference in vitro and in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:3665–70.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
B L, S B, P W, F M, A P, F M et al. Human caspase-4 detects tetra-acylated LPS and cytosolic Francisella and functions differently from murine caspase-11. Nat Commun. 2018; 9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-02682-y
Popoff MR. Purification and characterization of Clostridium sordellii lethal toxin and cross-reactivity with Clostridium difficile cytotoxin. Infect Immun. 1987;55:35–43.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
von Eichel-Streiber C, Harperath U, Bosse D, Hadding U. Purification of two high molecular weight toxins of Clostridium difficile which are antigenically related. Micro Pathog. 1987;2:307–18.
Article Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

We warmly thank the patients and their family for their involvement in this project. This work was performed in the framework of the Centre National de Reférence RAISE. We acknowledge the contribution of SFR Biosciences (UMS3444/CNRS, US8/Inserm, ENS de Lyon, UCBL) Platim, PSF (especially Virginie Gueguen-Chaignon) and cytometry facilities. We acknowledge the contribution of the Etablissement Français du Sang Auvergne - Rhône-Alpes. We thank Emmanuel Lemichez (Pasteur institute, Paris), TH team and ImmunAID members for materials, advice and stimulating discussions.

Funding

This work is supported by an ANR grant (SolvingMEFVariants). This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement No 779295. TH team is supported by The Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale (FRM EQU202103012640). DC is supported by a fellowship from The Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale (FDT202106012874).

Author information

These authors contributed equally: Pauline Bronnec, Flora Magnotti.

Authors and Affiliations

CIRI, Centre International de Recherche en Infectiologie, Univ Lyon, Inserm U1111, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, UMR5308, ENS de Lyon, F-69007, LYON, France
Daria Chirita, Pauline Bronnec, Flora Magnotti, Sarah Dalmon, Amandine Martin, Alexandre Belot, Yvan Jamilloux & Thomas Henry
Bacterial Toxins, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France
Michel Popoff
Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Croix-Rousse, Lyon 1 University, Lyon, France
Mathieu Gerfaud-Valentin, Pascal Sève & Yvan Jamilloux
LIFE, Lyon Immunopathology FEderation, Lyon, France
Alexandre Belot & Yvan Jamilloux
Department of Pediatric Nephrology, Rheumatology, Dermatology, Reference centre for Rheumatic, AutoImmune and Systemic diseases in children (RAISE), Hôpital Femme Mère Enfant, CHU Lyon, Bron, France
Alexandre Belot & Agnes Duquesne
Department of Internal Medicine, Saint André Hospital, CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
Anne Contis
Department of Rheumatology, Université Paris-Saclay, INSERM UMR1184: Center for immunology of viral infections and autoimmune diseases, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital Bicêtre, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France
Gaetane Nocturne
Paediatric onco-haematology, University Hospital of Nancy – Children’s hospital, Vandoeuvre-Lès-Nancy, France
Irene Lemelle
Sorbonne University, department of internal medicine, Tenon hospital, DMU 3ID, AP-HP, National reference center for autoinflammatory diseases and inflammatory Amyloidosis (CeRéMAIA), INSERM U938, Paris, France
Sophie Georgin-Lavialle
Department of Molecular genetics and Cytogenomics, CHU Montpellier, Univ Montpellier, Reference Center for Autoinflammatory Diseases and Amyloidosis (CeRéMAIA), Montpellier, France
Guilaine Boursier & Isabelle Touitou

Authors

Daria Chirita
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Pauline Bronnec
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Flora Magnotti
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Sarah Dalmon
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Amandine Martin
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Michel Popoff
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Mathieu Gerfaud-Valentin
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Pascal Sève
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Alexandre Belot
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Anne Contis
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Agnes Duquesne
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Gaetane Nocturne
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Irene Lemelle
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Sophie Georgin-Lavialle
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Guilaine Boursier
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Isabelle Touitou
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Yvan Jamilloux
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Thomas Henry
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization: DC, FM, YJ, TH. Investigation: DC, FM, SD, PB, AM. Resources: MP. GB, IT identified patients with specific mutations and contacted MDs. MGV, PS, AB, AC, AD, GN, IL, SGL, YJ enrolled specific patients and provided clinical information. Supervision: FM, YJ, TH. Funding Acquisition: YJ, TH. Project administration: YJ, TH. Writing-original draft: DC, TH. Writing -review and editing: all authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Henry.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval

The study was approved by the French Comité de Protection des Personnes SUD-EST IV (CPP,#L16–189), Ile de France IV (CPP, #2018/95) and by the French Comité Consultatif sur le Traitement de l’Information en matière de Recherche dans le domaine de la Santé (CCTIRS, #16.864). The authors observed a strict accordance to the Helsinki Declaration guidelines. HD blood was provided by the Etablissement Français du Sang in the framework of the convention #14–1820. Informed consent was obtained from all healthy donors and patients. All FMF patients fulfilled the Tel Hashomer criteria for FMF. The potential carriage of MEFV mutations in HD was not assessed. Blood samples from HD were drawn on the same day as patients. The number of patients in each experiment is reported in the corresponding figure panels.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Edited by Professor Sudan He

Supplementary information

Supplemental Table S1

Supplemental Table S2

Supplemental figures legend

Supplementary Figures S1-S6

Uncropped Western Blots

Manuscript

Cdd author contribution form

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chirita, D., Bronnec, P., Magnotti, F. et al. Mutations in the B30.2 and the central helical scaffold domains of pyrin differentially affect inflammasome activation. Cell Death Dis 14, 213 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-023-05745-9

Download citation

Received: 08 November 2022
Revised: 11 March 2023
Accepted: 15 March 2023
Published: 25 March 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-023-05745-9

This article is cited by

Phagocytic cell death leads to enhanced release of pro-inflammatory S100A12 in familial Mediterranean fever
- G. Varga
- S. Schleifenbaum
- H. Wittkowski
Molecular and Cellular Pediatrics (2023)