Cell motility is critical for tumor malignancy. Metabolism being an obligatory step in shaping cell behavior, we looked for metabolic weaknesses shared by motile cells across the diverse genetic contexts of patients’ glioblastoma. Computational analyses of single-cell transcriptomes from thirty patients’ tumors isolated cells with high motile potential and highlighted their metabolic specificities. These cells were characterized by enhanced mitochondrial load and oxidative stress coupled with mobilization of the cysteine metabolism enzyme 3-Mercaptopyruvate sulfurtransferase (MPST). Functional assays with patients’ tumor-derived cells and -tissue organoids, and genetic and pharmacological manipulations confirmed that the cells depend on enhanced ROS production and MPST activity for their motility. MPST action involved protection of protein cysteine residues from damaging hyperoxidation. Its knockdown translated in reduced tumor burden, and a robust increase in mice survival. Starting from cell-by-cell analyses of the patients’ tumors, our work unravels metabolic dependencies of cell malignancy maintained across heterogeneous genomic landscapes.
Tumor development is a complex process into which the ability of cancer cells to adapt their behavior to the constantly changing environment of a growing tumor and to therapies plays a crucial role. Metabolism is central in shaping cell behavior. Therefore, its appropriate reprogramming is expected to be mandatory for cancer cell plasticity. Metabolism appears moreover as a target of choice to overcome the heterogeneous genomic landscapes prevailing in complex tumors. The mapping of metabolic reprogramming in cancers progressed remarkably in recent years [1,2,3]. However, the nature and the role of metabolic activities specific to a given cancer cell behavior at the single-cell level and in the actual context of the patients’ tumors remain poorly explored. This is notably the case regarding cancer cell motility, a functional state essential for tumor malignancy.
In this study we explored the metabolic dependencies of cancer cell motility in glioblastoma (GB). GB is the most aggressive tumor of the adult human brain  and is a paradigm of intra-tumor heterogeneity. It is composed notably of a mixture of cancer cells bearing various mutational loads and genomic rearrangements, and differing ontogenic similarities with neurodevelopmental lineages, as shown by genome-wide DNA and RNA sequencing at the tissue and single-cell levels [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. GB is further characterized by the plasticity of its cancer cell populations that fuel tumor growth through reversible adaptations of their properties [9, 14, 15]. The highly infiltrative nature of GB cells makes complete surgical resection of the tumor impossible. Moreover, currently used irradiation and chemical therapies can promote GB cell invasiveness [16, 17]. Cell motility encompasses two processes: migration, i.e. the cell’s ability “to move around in a space that is freely available”, and invasion, a process involving microenvironment remodeling by the cells . Cell motility is a highly integrated process, motile cells having to develop protrusions in the direction of migration, disrupt adhesion sites at the cell rear, degrade and remodel the extracellular matrix (ECM) and ultimately make new connections at the cell front by remodeling their cytoskeleton so that they are pushed forward . Three major migration/invasion routes have been described in GB: the narrow and tortuous extracellular space of the brain parenchyma , the perivascular spaces surrounding blood vessels [20,21,22,–23] and the white matter tracts [20, 24]. Both single-cell and collective migration have been reported [25, 26]. However, it is still poorly known whether cell motility in the patient’s tumor depends on specific metabolic reprogramming. We therefore chose to harness single-cell transcriptomes of GB cells derived from surgical resections of the patients’ tumors, in order to identify metabolic enzymes playing key roles in the adoption and/or maintenance of cell motility.
To unravel the metabolic dependencies of motile cells within the heterogeneous context of the patients’ tumors, we started from single-cell transcriptome profiling of thirty tumors coming from four independent datasets. A signature-driven data reduction-based analysis resulted in highlighting cell subpopulations most likely to be in a motile state. Computational analyses integrating cell trajectory modeling characterized motile cells as endowed with higher energetic needs and oxidative stress than their more static counterparts. This modeling further identified an element of the cysteine metabolism, the 3-Mercaptopyruvate sulfurtransferase (MPST) enzyme, at the crossroad of the path from low to high motility. Experimental probing of the biological relevance of these findings using a variety of functional assays resulted in fine in demonstrating MPST as a previously unsuspected key metabolic player in the switch from low to high cell motility and maintenance of GB cell motility.
Grouping GB cells from distinct patients according to their motility potential
We first aimed at identifying cells in a motile state from single-cell transcriptomes coming from distinct patients’ tumors. For this purpose, we used four independent publicly-available single-cell transcriptome datasets generated from surgical resections of patients bearing IDH-wild-type GB. These datasets were obtained from 30 tumors with varying genomic and epigenetic anomalies, notably according to MGMT methylation, TP53 mutant or wild-type status, ATRX loss, Chr7 duplication or Chr10 deletion [9, 27] (Figs. S1A and S2A). Two datasets were obtained with the SMART-seq2 technology [9, 27] and two with the 10X Genomics technology [9, 28], hereafter designated as N-S, D-S, N-10X and PA-10X, respectively. The computational analyses were first performed using the N-S dataset, and the robustness of the results evaluated by repeating the analyses with each of the other three datasets.
For clustering cells in a motile state, we implemented a data reduction approach driven by a molecular signature (Fig. 1a). Cells were grouped based on the combined expression levels of each gene in a motility signature, using the HCPC algorithm (Hierarchical Clustering on Principal Components) modified to integrate also UMAP components (Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection; Fig. S3A). The motility signature genes were selected based on prior in vitro and in vivo experimental demonstrations of their requirement for GB cell motility using recent patient-derived GB cells (PDC) cultured in defined media. These inducers and effectors of GB cell motility are involved in pro-motile autocrine signaling (TGFB1, SMAD3, THBS1 [29,30,–31]), cell morphological rearrangements linking extracellular guidance signals with cytoskeleton remodeling (ACTN4 [32,33,–34], PTK2 [35, 36], PXN [36,37,–38], TLN1 , VCL ) and remodeling of the matri-cellular environment (TNC , SPARCL1 ). Expression of each signature gene is most often positively correlated with expression of the other signature genes across all cells (Fig. 1b, Table S1).
This clustering analysis resulted in six cell clusters (Fig. 1c) with distinct combinations of expression of the signature genes (Fig. 1d). Each cluster was composed of cells coming from distinct tumors, as indicated by the low Normalized Mutual Information value (NMI = 0.11; Fig. 1e). This demonstrates that cell clustering is driven by functional state rather than tumor of origin as we previously described . Of note, HCPC integrating UMAP components led to groups of cells with transcriptomic profiles more homogeneous than when using HCPC alone, as shown by increased Silhouette width (Fig. S3B). Using the geometric mean of the signature gene expression levels as a motility score, we retained the two cell clusters with the highest (MHIGH) and lowest (MLOW) motile potential, respectively (Fig. 1f). Differential expression analysis between MHIGH and MLOW cell groups (Mann–Whitney, BH-adjusted p-value < 0.01) highlighted the genes overexpressed in MHIGH cells (Table S2). Gene ontology (GO) enrichment analyses provided a first support to the suitability of our strategy for identifying motile cells by highlighting an enrichment of motility-related terms among the genes most overexpressed in MHIGH cells (Fig. 1g and Table S3).
We next repeated the same analytical strategy with the three other selected datasets (Figure S3C–E). Each of the analyses resulted in clusters composed of cells coming from different tumors (NMI = 0.058–0.15; Fig. S3C–E). Comparing the lists of genes overexpressed in MHIGH cell group between the datasets showed the highest overlaps between lists from datasets obtained with the same sequencing technology (69.2% (4852/7010) and 86.0% (6627/7707) between datasets obtained with SMART-seq2 and 10X Genomics technologies, respectively, Fig. S3F). Comparing the four lists of overexpressed genes showed that 43 to 53% of the genes overexpressed in MHIGH cells from one dataset were also overexpressed in the three other datasets (Fig. S3F and Table S2). Finally, GO enrichment analyses of the most overexpressed genes, again highlighted enrichment in motility-related terms in each dataset (Fig. S4 and Table S3). These results indicate that our analytical strategy captures cells with similar transcriptional profiles enriched in motility-related terms in all datasets studied.
To further probe the suitability of our analytical approach for identifying cells in a motile state, we selected three gene modules previously found to be associated with GB cell motility (Table S2), and determined their enrichment in MHIGH cells. Most motile cells, including GB cells, have been shown to undergo transcriptional reprogramming akin to the so-called epithelial-mesenchymal transformation (EMT) process. We therefore used an EMT gene module of 14 genes associated with mesenchymal transformation of neural cells and GB cell motility [19, 42]. We also sought for enrichments in two other gene modules. One consists of 36 genes with highly correlated expression in the outer radial glia (oRG)-like malignant cell population with increased invasive behavior in GB . The other consists of 32 genes involved in the regulation of GB cell motility and driven by TEAD transcription factors . Each of these gene modules was enriched in MHIGH cells in all analyzed datasets (Fig. 1h). We also observed a positive linear relationship between the motility score and the EMT, oRG, and TEAD scores (Figs. 1i and S5). As expected from these correlations, the EMT, oRG, and TEAD scores were significantly higher in MHIGH cells compared to MLOW cells (Figs. 1j and S5).
Altogether, these results support the relevance of the analytical strategy implemented for capturing cells with high motile potential from distinct datasets.
Metabolic reprogramming of cells with high motile potential
We went on to identify metabolic pathways deregulated in GB cells with high motile potential. The genes coding for enzymatic components of the metabolic pathways were identified among the genes overexpressed in MHIGH cells in each dataset using the 2019 KEGG list of 1586 metabolic elements  (Table S4). KEGG pathway enrichment analyses highlighted metabolic pathways related to ECM modeling (e.g. glycosaminoglycan synthesis/degradation) and membrane composition rearrangements (e.g. unsaturated fatty acids (FA), FA elongation, GPI-anchor biosynthesis; Fig. 2a and Table S4). In addition to these metabolic pathways expected to be active in motile cells, we also observed enrichment in pathways involved in energy production (Fig. 2a and Table S4). Overexpression of genes involved in glycolysis, amino acid catabolism, FA degradation, protein recycling (lysosome), TCA cycle, oxidative phosphorylation, suggests that MHIGH cells have higher energetic needs than MLOW cells. Enrichment in oxidative phosphorylation, a term gathering elements of the electron transport chain (ETC), associated with enrichment in TCA cycle components, suggests in addition a higher mitochondrial load in MHIGH cells. Finally, we observed enrichment in pathways involved in anti-oxidative processes, such as the pentose phosphate pathway, and the cysteine, sulfur, and glutathione metabolisms (Fig. 2a and Table S4). Enrichments in pathways or organelles involved in reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenging and/or production of anti-oxidants (porphyrin and selenocompound metabolisms, peroxisome), as well as enrichment in purine/pyrimidine metabolism required for DNA/RNA repair, are also compatible with enhanced responses to oxidative stress. Overall, the results of this analysis point to an enhanced mobilization of anti-oxidative pathways counteracting the deleterious actions of ROS derived from the over-mobilization of energy production pathways.
Trajectory modeling was used next to pinpoint metabolic components potentially crucial for acquiring a motile cell state. Trajectory reconstruction based on expression of the motility signature genes was achieved with the STREAM python package using the N-S dataset which has the highest sequencing depth. The inferred trajectory corresponded to a branched path, highlighting an intermediary branch (S3-S1 branch) linking cells with low motile potential to cells with high motile potential (Fig. 2b). Among the metabolic enzymes overexpressed in S3-S1 branch compared to each of the other branches, characterizing therefore the switch between low and high motile states, two were overexpressed in MHIGH cells of all datasets considered, NIT2 and MPST (Table S5). Their participation in the control of GB cell properties is unknown. We selected MPST for further studies owing to its potential anti-oxidative activity. MPST converts 3-mercaptopyruvate, derived from cysteine transamination, to pyruvate while transferring a sulfur to a thiophilic acceptor, thereby forming a persulfide . It is thus endowed with potential anti-oxidant activities through protein persulfidation (P-SSH, also known as S-sulfhydration), a post-translational modification of reactive cysteine residues preventing their irreversible hyperoxidation [45, 46]. Interestingly, we observed MPST overexpression in GB tissues compared to normal brain tissues (Fig. 2c). In addition, we identified the mitochondria-located GOT2, an aminotransferase ensuring the formation of the MPST substrate 3-mercaptopyruvate, among the genes overexpressed in GB cells with high motile potential (Table S2).
Altogether, our computational analyses predict that enhanced oxidative stress coupled with MPST mobilization is instrumental in GB cell motility (Fig. 2d).
Enhanced ROS production and mitochondrial mass characterize motile cells
We next verified experimentally whether enhanced oxidative stress and MPST mobilization were indeed functionally involved in GB cell motility. We first determined whether ROS affect GB cell motility, using GB patient-derived cells (PDC) or -derived tissue organoids (GBO) cultured in serum-free media. PDC relative migratory and invasive properties, determined using spheroid-on-Matrigel migration assays, invasion-across-collagen assays and Matrigel-coated transwell assays, showed 5706**-PDC to be the most motile, followed by R633- and P3-PDC (Fig. S6A–C).
Intracellular ROS levels were evaluated with CellROX® Green or Deep red fluorogenic probes. Their suitability for detecting ROS in GB PDC was verified by FACS following PDC treatment with the anti-oxidant N-Acetyl Cysteine (NAC) or the ROS generator menadione (Fig. 3a). Microscopic observation of PDC-spheroids first seeded on Matrigel and then labeled with CellROX® probe showed a higher ROS signal in GB cells migrating out of the spheroids compared to their static counterparts (Fig. 3b).
Considering this result with our observation of enriched expression in genes involved in the TCA cycle and the ETC in MHIGH cells, we measured mitochondrial mass using the MitoTracker probe. An increased mitochondrial load was detected in cells migrating out from PDC-spheroids (Fig. 3c). FACS was then used to isolate PDC according to their CellROX or Mitrotracker signals. Cells with high ROS production exhibited a 2.1–2.6 times higher mitochondrial mass than cells with low ROS production (Fig. 3d). Conversely, cells with high mitochondrial mass exhibited a higher ROS production than cells with low mitochondrial mass (1.9–3.2 times more) (Fig. 3e). We next assessed the invasive potential of GB PDC with high ROS production. To do so, we FACS-sorted GB PDC according to their ROS production (Fig. 3f). We found a 1.4–7.7-fold increase in invasiveness of GB cells with high ROS levels compared to cells with low ROS levels, as determined with Matrigel-coated transwell invasion assays (Fig. 3f). In a coherent manner, decreasing ROS levels with NAC decreased GB cells’ invasiveness (Fig. 3g). These results indicate that motile GB cells exhibit enhanced ROS production, as predicted by the results of the computational analyses, and that ROS participate to GB cell motility.
MPST enzymatic activity is required for GB cell motility
To determine if MPST is necessary for GB cell motility, we first assessed MPST protein levels in motile GB cells by immunocytochemistry. As expected, the profile of the MPST-immunoreactive signal overlapped with those of the CellROS and MitoTracker signals (Fig. S6D). The highest MPST-immunoreactive signal was observed in cells located at the periphery of PDC-spheroids and of tissue organoids (GBO), and in cells that migrated out of the spheroids or of GBO (Fig. 4a). In coherence with the results of the bioinformatics analyses predicting enhanced MPST expression in migrating cells, quantification of MPST-immunoreactive cells confirmed that the proportion of cells expressing MPST was far greater in cells located away from the spheroids (97.6 ± 2.2%) and at its periphery (77.2 ± 6.2%) than within the spheroid cores (8.7 ± 5.7%) (Fig. 4a, graph). We next knocked down MPST expression using lentiviral transduction of a small hairpin (sh) RNA, which led to decreased MPST mRNA and protein levels with no major cytotoxic effect (Figs. S6E–G and S7). Similar results were obtained with another shMPST construct (Fig. S6I, J). Evaluation of the overall energetic metabolism using the Seahorse XFe24 Analyzer showed no major change in mitochondrial respiration upon MPST knockdown (Fig. S6H). Knocking down MPST expression resulted in a sharp decrease in cell migration (51-86%) as determined with spheroid-on-Matrigel assays (Figs. 4b and S6K). Effect of MPST knockdown on cell migration was also probed using microfluidic chips, which allow mimicking the constrained space through which the cells move within tissues (further described in supplemental methods). Monitoring cells’ ability to move across 4.5-µm-height curved micro-channels with periodic 3 µm mechanical constraints in a microfluidic chip further showed that MPST knockdown also impaired GB cells’ ability to change their shape so as to migrate through narrow and tortuous spaces (Fig. 4c). Cell invasion was also decreased by 44–95% upon MPST knockdown as observed using spheroid-in-collagen (Fig. 4d) and Matrigel-coated transwell invasion assays (Fig. 4e).
The observed decrease in cell motility can be due to an inhibition of MPST catalytic activity or to defects in other MPST functions. To distinguish between these two possibilities, we treated cells or GBOs with 200 µM I3-MT-3, a selective pharmacological inhibitor of MPST enzymatic activity . I3-MT-3 decreased PDC migration out from PDC-spheroids and GBO seeded on Matrigel (Fig. 4f). I3-MT-3 inhibited also PDC migration through constraining microfluidic chip channels (Fig. 4g). These results indicated that MPST catalytic activity was required for GB cell motility. Mechanistically, MPST catalyzes a persulfidation process through a two-step transfer of the SH group from its substrate 3-mercaptopyruvate, first to the enzyme itself, and then to protein cysteine residues and other molecules resulting in their persulfidation  (Fig. 5a). We therefore determined protein persulfidation levels in PDC with decreased MPST expression or activity using the recently published Dimedone-Switch method . NBF-Cl protein labeling showed similar protein patterns in control PDC and in PDC expressing shMPST or treated with I3-MT-3 (Figs. 5b, c and S8). In control PDC, persulfidated proteins were detected within both high and low molecular weight ranges, albeit at higher levels at low molecular weights. MPST knockdown, as well as MPST enzymatic inhibition, resulted in an overall decrease in protein persulfidation levels across all molecular weight ranges (Fig. 5b, c and S8). These results show that in GB cells, MPST mechanism of action implicates protein persulfidation.
Finally, we evaluated the consequences of MPST knockdown on overall tumor burden using brain xenografts of PDC stably expressing luciferase and either shControl or shMPST. Bioluminescence imaging showed tumor initiation from shControl and shMPST-expressing cells (Fig. 5d). We observed a reduced tumor burden in mice grafted with shMPST-PDC, compared to mice grafted with shControl-PDC up to the experiment end-points (Figs. 5e and S6L), and a 1.6-fold increase in the median survival expectancy of mice xenografted with shMPST-PDC (Fig. 5f).
The diversity of cancer cells populating GB is a major challenge in treating these brain cancers. Understanding the molecular basis of the varying functional cell states co-existing within GB at the time of patients’ diagnosis and commonly shared across tumors, opens a path to overcome this challenge. A way to access such information is coupling experimental validations with computational modeling of transcriptomes of single cells sorted from patient GB, which offer one of the closest possible maps of the patients’ tumors. Following this blueprint led to circumscribing the overall metabolic characteristics of motile cells across thirty patients’ GB, and to identifying MPST as a metabolic enzyme crucial for GB cell motility and tumor development.
GB cells with high motile potential were characterized by higher energetic production than cells with low motile potential, as shown by the enrichment in multiple energetic pathways. This is in agreement with motile cell needing to mobilize different energetic pathways to adapt to new microenvironments with unique nutrient and oxygen availability . The predicted convergence of this overall energetic mobilization towards the TCA and the ETC was verified by the experimental demonstration of enhanced ROS production and higher mitochondrial mass load in motile GB cells. These results are coherent with the reported stimulation of direct redox modification of protein components of pro-migratory signaling pathways [50, 51], and with increased mitochondrial superoxide production during epithelial cancer cell metastasis .
Intracellular ROS levels must however be tightly controlled since ROS overload can have severe deleterious consequences on cell properties and viability. Our results indicate that GB cells with high motile potential are enriched in anti-oxidant pathways capable of counteracting oxidative stress including the pentose phosphate pathway, which implicates enhanced NADPH production necessary for the function of several antioxidant proteins, and the glycine, glutamate and cysteine metabolisms together with glutathione metabolism that implicates enhanced availability of the major anti-oxidant compound GSH. Cysteine metabolism involvement in the anti-oxidative process extends beyond supporting GSH synthesis. The enzymes of the cysteine metabolism, Cystathionine Gamma-Lyase (CGL or CSE, encoded by CTH), Cystathionine Beta-Synthase (CBS) and MPST (also known as MST), participate to protein protection from detrimental hyperoxidation of their reactive cysteine residues .
MPST was the only metabolic enzyme participating in protection from oxidative stress predicted by trajectory modeling to be at the crossroad of the path leading GB cells from low to high motility. Our results demonstrate the biological validity of this prediction. MPST knockdown resulted in decreased ability of the cells to move around in a freely available space, as well as to move into their surroundings by remodeling the ECM. Interestingly, MPST has been linked to the migration of murine colon cancer cell line CT26 , raising the possibility of its involvement in the motility of cancer cells other than GB cells. Alteration of GB cell properties by MPST knockdown translates in vivo into reduced tumor burden, and a robust increase in mice survival, albeit the cells retain their tumor-initiating properties. MPST enzymatic activity is required for its pro-motile effects, the MPST pharmacological inhibitor I3-MT-3  having the same consequences as MPST knockdown on GB cell migration. Protein persulfidation is part of the mechanisms by which MPST affects GB cell motility. Reduced MPST expression or activity was accompanied with decreased persulfidated protein levels in GB cells.
A few surveys of persulfidated proteins have been performed in control conditions, without dihydrogene sulfide (H2S) supplementation [48, 54,55,56,57]. Interestingly, proteins pertaining to the migration machinery and associated signaling pathways were found to undergo persulfidation, such as the focal protein kinase encoded by PTKN2 and EGFR in EGF-treated HeLa cells , or actin in the mouse liver . The overall protection of proteins from hyperoxidative damage conferred by this post-translational modification can also be accompanied with more specific consequences. Persulfidation was reported to enhance actin polymerization and alter actin-dependent cytoskeletal rearrangements in HEK293 cells , and the persulfidated form of glycolytic enzymes such as GAPDH or LDHA were found to exhibit enhanced catalytic activity [55, 56, 58]. The protein persulfidations reported in these studies have been associated with CBS and/or CSE activities, as supported by studies implementing inactivation of these enzymes and/or by their conspicuous expression in the studied biological systems [48, 55,56,57,58,59]. In addition to producing low molecular weight persulfides [59,60,–61], MPST has also been found to mediate protein persulfidation of the sulfurtransferase Mocs3 and of thioredoxin (Trx). Through Mocs3, MPST is involved in a cascade leading to protein urmylation and tRNA thiolation, and through Trx in H2S generation . Our observation of an overall decrease in protein persulfidation levels upon MPST knockdown indicates that MPST can affect a wider range of proteins at least in GB cells. Identifying the specific targets of MPST in GB motile cells will require further studies combining selection of motile and static cells with immunoprecipitation methods coupled with proteomic profiling.
Whether our results pertain to a specific mode of cell motility and/or path of migration calls for further investigations. Enrichment of oRG-like gene modules in MHIGH cells suggests that the motile cells we captured move in a solitary rather than in a collective fashion, like oRGs in the developing cortex. The observation that cells expressing neutral shRNA or shMPST maintain their respective motile or non-motile properties when mixed in equal numbers in microfluidic chip assays also supports a cell-autonomous action of MPST. The cells analyzed in our study most likely come from dense tumor cell regions since removal of the surrounding parenchyma is undertaken with great caution by neurosurgeons in order to spare at the best motor and cognitive functions. Our findings are therefore likely to relate to cells moving along the blood vessel network that characterize these highly angiogenic tumors, or across the tumor parenchyma enriched in components favoring cell displacement.
Discovery of the participation of MPST in the control of GB cell motility was made possible by considering metabolism in the context of its cell-by-cell variability in the human tumor. Altogether, our results highlight a new face of oxidative stress mechanism of action in promoting malignancy by unraveling the essential role of the MPST enzyme in cell motility, and thereby a metabolic dependency shared by tumors with variable genomic landscapes. They thus provide an important step forward in our understanding of the metabolic elements critical for cancer cell motility.
Material and methods
Table S6 lists all resources, materials, bio-informatics tools, corresponding websites and references. Cell imaging was achieved with a fluorescent microscope Axioplan 2 (Zeiss).
Of the publicly-available single-cell transcriptomic datasets from GB tumors collected from adult patients, we downloaded the only two obtained with the SMART-seq2 technique [9, 27], and two of the ones obtained with the 10X Genomics technique [9, 28] (Table S6). The latter were selected over others because of the raw UMI counts availability. Malignant and normal cells were distinguished either according to the cell annotations provided for both SMART-seq2 datasets, or when absent as for 10X Genomics datasets, based on inference of copy-number variations (CNVs), a hallmark of malignant cells (Supplemental methods, Figs. S1 and 2). Data pre-processing is further detailed in Supplemental methods. As a result, we retained for further analyses 4916 malignant cells from twenty GB in the N-S dataset, 1033 from four GB in the D-S dataset, 5797 from six GB in the N-10X dataset and 8666 from six GB in the PA-10X dataset. Log2-transformed Counts Per Million (log2(CPM + 1)) were used for D-S and the 10X datasets, and log2-transformed Transcripts Per Million (log2(TPM + 1) for N-S dataset, unless otherwise specified (Supplemental methods). To avoid potential analytical bias due to scarcely detected genes, genes detected in less than 1% cells were filtered out.
Cell grouping analyses based on a molecular signature of ten elements were achieved using the HCPC approach (FactoMineR package ) modified to implement also UMAP components (Supplemental methods, Fig. S3A). The cell grouping was visualized using UMAP, chord plots or heatmaps with optimized color palettes (Table S6). NMI values were calculated to determine the contribution of cells issued from distinct tumors to each cluster (Supplemental methods). Motility score was obtained by computing the geometric mean of the expression values per cell of each element of the molecular signature. When null, expression values were imputed with a value of 1.
Genes differentially expressed between cell groups with differing scores were identified using Mann–Whitney test (Benjamini–Hochberg (BH)-adjusted p-value < 0.01). Genes coding for metabolism enzymes were identified using the list from KEGG. Comparing lists of differentially expressed genes between distinct datasets was performed on genes detected in all datasets (eulerr package). Gene ontology analyses were carried out on the enrichR website. Significance level was set at BH-adjusted p-value < 0.05 (Fisher’s Exact test). Redundant terms were excluded. Significance level was set at BH-adjusted p-value < 0.05 (Fisher’s Exact test). Graphs were generated using ggplot2 R package.
The path taken by cells with low motile potential to reach a high motile potential was modeled using trajectory inference analysis (STREAM python package ). Briefly, the expression values of the ten elements of the motility signature were extracted, and dimensions reduced to four components using the spectral embedding algorithm. The components were then used for simultaneous tree structure learning and fitting using ElPiGraph. The resulting trajectory structure was represented in a 2D subway map plot, where straight lines represent branches and each dot represents a single cell. Genes differentially expressed between cell populations from two adjacent branches were identfied (Mann–Whitney U test, q-value < 0.05).
Supplemental methods describe further methodological details and datafiles S1 and S2 the R and Python scripts used.
Biological material, lentiviral transduction and pharmacological treatment
PDC-R633, -5706** and -P3 obtained in our and other laboratories from neurosurgical biopsy samples of distinct GB were cultured in defined medium containing bFGF and EGF or bFGF only (P3), as described [64,65,–66]. They stably express luciferase, and 5706**-PDC express GFP as well. Lentiviral vectors were used to transduce cells with a shRNA either neutral (shControl) or targeting MPST transcripts (shMPST; Table S6). The shMPST construct encoding GFP in addition to the shRNA allowed distinction between shControl and shMPST cells. Non-transduced cells were eliminated with puromycin (1–2 µg/mL). GBO were generated from a GB patient tumor (Table S6) as described . In relevant experiments, cells were treated with 200 µM I3-MT-3 (MedChemExpress) or 1 mM NAC (Sigma) or their vehicles (DMSO and culture media respectively).
Cell motility assays
Cell migration was assessed using spheroid-on-Matrigel assay, as described , and microfluidic chips. The chips were designed and fabricated, as described , and included successive mechanical constraints for assessing cells’ ability to change shape so as to move through narrow and tortuous spaces. Cell invasion was assessed using spheroid-in-collagen assay and Matrigel-coated transwells as described [68, 70]. Further details and quantification methods are given in Supplemental methods.
Detection of intracellular ROS levels
Cells or spheroids were incubated at 37 °C for 30 min with CellROX Green (5 µM/R633, 10 µM/P3) or Deep Red reagent (1.25 µM/P3, 2.5 µM/R633 and 5706**) (ThermoFisher). Fluorescence signal was then assessed by microscopy (CellROX Green, Zeiss microscope) or FACS (CellROX Deep Red, ARIA II, BD Biosciences). When indicated, cells were treated with NAC (1 h, 37 °C) and/or Menadione (30 min, 37 °C), prior FACS analysis of ROS levels as detailed in Supplemental methods.
Measure of mitochondrial mass
Cells, spheroids, or GBO were incubated with 1 µM MitoTracker Green reagent (Invitrogen) at 37 °C for 30 min and the fluorescence signal was assessed by microscopy or FACS (Supplemental methods).
Gene and protein expression analyses
Gene expression knockdown in response to shRNA expression was verified by RT-QPCR as previously described  using the LightCycler480 (Roche, France) and the SYBR Green PCR Core Reagents kit (Bimake.com; primer sequences in Table S6).
MPST protein levels were determined using immunobloting assays with anti-MPST (Sigma, 1:4000), and ImageJ software for densitometric analysis. MPST signals were normalized by the amount of protein load as assessed with Red Ponceau. For immunocytochemistry, harvested cells were PBS washed, smeared on SuperFrost slides (ThermoScientific, France), fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, PBS washed and incubated in Antibody blocker/diluent (Enzo, 1 hr, room temperature). MPST antibody (Sigma, 1:50, overnight, 4 °C) and next anti-rabbit A555 (Life Technologies, 1:500, 1 h, room temperature) were applied. Fluorescent signals were analyzed after nuclear DAPI staining (Sigma) with Zen software (Zeiss) using 2.5 µm optical sections.
Persulfidated protein levels were assessed following the Dimedone-Switch protocol, as described by Zivanovic and colleagues  (Supplemental methods). Briefly, this method relies on the indiscriminate labeling of persulfides, thiols, sulfenic acids, and amino groups with the fluorogenic 4-chloro-7-nitrobenzofurazan (NBF-Cl, Em = 488 nm). Subsequent incubation with a Cy7.5-tagged dimedone derivative that reacts selectively with the persulfides, enables persulfide identification by Cy7.5-labeling. The NBF-Cl (Em = 488 nm) and Cy7.5 (Em = 800 nm) signals are recorded in gel after protein separation (Chemidoc Imager, BioRad, France). The Cy7.5 persulfidation signals were normalized by the A488 (NBF-adducts) signals.
Animal experimentation was approved by Comité d’éthique en expérimentation animale Charles Darwin No. 5 (Protocol #5379). In all, 1.5 × 105 cells were injected stereotaxically into the striatum of anesthetized 8-10 weeks-old Nude female mice (Janvier Laboratories, France), and tumor formation and development monitored by bioluminescence imaging (Biospace Lab, M3 Vision software, France) as described .
R or Prism 7.0 (GraphPad) softwares were used to generate plots and for statistical analyses. Significance level was set at p < 0.05, unless otherwise indicated. Each statistical test used is provided in the figure legends. All experiments were performed using independent biological samples. Mean ± SD are shown.
All data generated during this study has been included in this manuscript and its supplemental files.
Viale A, Corti D, Draetta GF. Tumors and mitochondrial respiration: a neglected connection. Cancer Res. 2015;75:3685–6.
Badr CE, Silver DJ, Siebzehnrubl FA, Deleyrolle LP. Metabolic heterogeneity and adaptability in brain tumors. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2020;77:5101–19.
Pavlova NN, Zhu J, Thompson CB. The hallmarks of cancer metabolism: still emerging. Cell Metab. 2022;34:355–77.
Stupp R, Taillibert S, Kanner A, Read W, Steinberg D, Lhermitte B, et al. Effect of tumor-treating fields plus maintenance temozolomide vs maintenance temozolomide alone on survival in patients with glioblastoma: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2017;318:2306–16.
Snuderl M, Fazlollahi L, Le LP, Nitta M, Zhelyazkova BH, Davidson CJ, et al. Mosaic amplification of multiple receptor tyrosine kinase genes in glioblastoma. Cancer Cell. 2011;20:810–7.
Sottoriva A, Spiteri I, Piccirillo SGM, Touloumis A, Collins VP, Marioni JC, et al. Intratumor heterogeneity in human glioblastoma reflects cancer evolutionary dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:4009–14.
Lee JK, Wang J, Sa JK, Ladewig E, Lee HO, Lee IH, et al. Spatiotemporal genomic architecture informs precision oncology in glioblastoma. Nat Genet. 2017;49:594–9.
Puchalski RB, Shah N, Miller J, Dalley R, Nomura SR, Yoon JG, et al. An anatomic transcriptional atlas of human glioblastoma. Science 2018;360:660–3.
Neftel C, Laffy J, Filbin MG, Hara T, Shore ME, Rahme GJ, et al. An integrative model of cellular states, plasticity, and genetics for glioblastoma. Cell 2019;178:835–849.e21.
Bhaduri A, Di Lullo E, Jung D, Müller S, Crouch EE, Espinosa CS, et al. Outer radial glia-like cancer stem cells contribute to heterogeneity of glioblastoma. Cell Stem Cell. 2020;26:48–63.e6.
Couturier CP, Ayyadhury S, Le PU, Nadaf J, Monlong J, Riva G, et al. Single-cell RNA-seq reveals that glioblastoma recapitulates a normal neurodevelopmental hierarchy. Nat Commun. 2020;11:3406.
Wang R, Sharma R, Shen X, Laughney AM, Funato K, Clark PJ, et al. Adult human glioblastomas harbor radial glia-like cells. Stem Cell Rep. 2020;14:338–50.
Richards LM, Whitley OKN, MacLeod G, Cavalli FMG, Coutinho FJ, Jaramillo JE, et al. Gradient of Developmental and Injury Response transcriptional states defines functional vulnerabilities underpinning glioblastoma heterogeneity. Nat Cancer. 2021;2:157–73.
Dirkse A, Golebiewska A, Buder T, Nazarov PV, Muller A, Poovathingal S, et al. Stem cell-associated heterogeneity in Glioblastoma results from intrinsic tumor plasticity shaped by the microenvironment. Nat Commun. 2019;10:1787.
Yabo YA, Niclou SP, Golebiewska A. Cancer cell heterogeneity and plasticity: a paradigm shift in glioblastoma. Neuro Oncol. 2022;24:669–82.
Huber SM, Butz L, Stegen B, Klumpp D, Braun N, Ruth P, et al. Ionizing radiation, ion transports, and radioresistance of cancer cells. Front Physiol. 2013;4:212.
Lu KV, Chang JP, Parachoniak CA, Pandika MM, Aghi MK, Meyronet D, et al. VEGF inhibits tumor cell invasion and mesenchymal transition through a MET/VEGFR2 complex. Cancer Cell. 2012;22:21–35.
de Gooijer MC, Guillén Navarro M, Bernards R, Wurdinger T, van Tellingen O. An experimenter’s guide to glioblastoma invasion pathways. Trends Mol Med. 2018;24:763–80.
Armento A, Ehlers J, Schötterl S, Naumann U. Molecular Mechanisms of Glioma Cell Motility. In: De Vleeschouwer S, editor. Glioblastoma [Internet]. Brisbane (AU): Codon Publications; 2017; Chapter 5.
Scherer HJ. Structural development in gliomas. Cancer Res.1938;333‑51:34.
Montana V, Sontheimer H. Bradykinin promotes the chemotactic invasion of primary brain tumors. J Neurosci. 2011;31:4858–67.
Watkins S, Robel S, Kimbrough IF, Robert SM, Ellis-Davies G, Sontheimer H. Disruption of astrocyte-vascular coupling and the blood-brain barrier by invading glioma cells. Nat Commun. 2014;5:4196.
Cuddapah VA, Robel S, Watkins S, Sontheimer H. A neurocentric perspective on glioma invasion. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2014;15:455–65.
Pedersen PH, Edvardsen K, Garcia-Cabrera I, Mahesparan R, Thorsen J, Mathisen B, et al. Migratory patterns of lac-z transfected human glioma cells in the rat brain. Int J Cancer. 1995;62:767–71.
Vollmann-Zwerenz A, Leidgens V, Feliciello G, Klein CA, Hau P. Tumor cell invasion in glioblastoma. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21:E1932.
Volovetz J, Berezovsky AD, Alban T, Chen Y, Lauko A, Aranjuez GF, et al. Identifying conserved molecular targets required for cell migration of glioblastoma cancer stem cells. Cell Death Dis. 2020;11:152.
Darmanis S, Sloan SA, Croote D, Mignardi M, Chernikova S, Samghababi P, et al. Single-cell RNA-seq analysis of infiltrating neoplastic cells at the migrating front of human glioblastoma. Cell Rep. 2017;21:1399–410.
Pombo Antunes AR, Scheyltjens I, Lodi F, Messiaen J, Antoranz A, Duerinck J, et al. Single-cell profiling of myeloid cells in glioblastoma across species and disease stage reveals macrophage competition and specialization. Nat Neurosci. 2021;24:595–610.
Joseph JV, Conroy S, Tomar T, Eggens-Meijer E, Bhat K, Copray S, et al. TGF-β is an inducer of ZEB1-dependent mesenchymal transdifferentiation in glioblastoma that is associated with tumor invasion. Cell Death Dis. 2014;5:e1443.
Daubon T, Léon C, Clarke K, Andrique L, Salabert L, Darbo E, et al. Deciphering the complex role of thrombospondin-1 in glioblastoma development. Nat Commun. 2019;10:1146.
Joseph JV, Magaut CR, Storevik S, Geraldo LH, Mathivet T, Latif MA, et al. TGF-β promotes microtube formation in glioblastoma through thrombospondin 1. Neuro Oncol. 2022;24:541–53.
Sen S, Dong M, Kumar S. Isoform-specific contributions of alpha-actinin to glioma cell mechanobiology. PLoS ONE. 2009;4:e8427.
Ji J, Xu R, Ding K, Bao G, Zhang X, Huang B, et al. Long noncoding RNA SChLAP1 forms a growth-promoting complex with HNRNPL in human glioblastoma through stabilization of ACTN4 and activation of NF-κB signaling. Clin Cancer Res. 2019;25:6868–81.
Tentler D, Lomert E, Novitskaya K, Barlev NA. Role of ACTN4 in tumorigenesis, metastasis, and EMT. Cells 2019;8:E1427.
Xia S, Lal B, Tung B, Wang S, Goodwin CR, Laterra J. Tumor microenvironment tenascin-C promotes glioblastoma invasion and negatively regulates tumor proliferation. Neuro Oncol. 2016;18:507–17.
Frolov A, Evans IM, Li N, Sidlauskas K, Paliashvili K, Lockwood N, et al. Imatinib and Nilotinib increase glioblastoma cell invasion via Abl-independent stimulation of p130Cas and FAK signalling. Sci Rep. 2016;6:27378.
López-Colomé AM, Lee-Rivera I, Benavides-Hidalgo R, López E. Paxillin: a crossroad in pathological cell migration. J Hematol Oncol. 2017;10:50.
Sun LH, Yang FQ, Zhang CB, Wu YP, Liang JS, Jin S, et al. Overexpression of paxillin correlates with tumor progression and predicts poor survival in glioblastoma. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2017;23:69–75.
Kang W, Kim SH, Cho HJ, Jin J, Lee J, Joo KM, et al. Talin1 targeting potentiates anti-angiogenic therapy by attenuating invasion and stem-like features of glioblastoma multiforme. Oncotarget 2015;6:27239–51.
Gagliardi F, Narayanan A, Mortini P. SPARCL1 a novel player in cancer biology. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2017;109:63–8.
Saurty-Seerunghen MS, Bellenger L, El-Habr EA, Delaunay V, Garnier D, Chneiweiss H, et al. Capture at the single cell level of metabolic modules distinguishing aggressive and indolent glioblastoma cells. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2019;7:155.
Carro MS, Lim WK, Alvarez MJ, Bollo RJ, Zhao X, Snyder EY, et al. The transcriptional network for mesenchymal transformation of brain tumours. Nature 2010;463:318–25.
Tome-Garcia J, Erfani P, Nudelman G, Tsankov AM, Katsyv I, Tejero R, et al. Analysis of chromatin accessibility uncovers TEAD1 as a regulator of migration in human glioblastoma. Nat Commun. 2018;9:4020.
Kanehisa M, Furumichi M, Tanabe M, Sato Y, Morishima K. KEGG: new perspectives on genomes, pathways, diseases and drugs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45:D353–61.
Pedre B, Dick TP. 3-Mercaptopyruvate sulfurtransferase: an enzyme at the crossroads of sulfane sulfur trafficking. Biol Chem. 2021;402:223–37.
Filipovic MR, Zivanovic J, Alvarez B, Banerjee R. Chemical biology of H2S signaling through persulfidation. Chem Rev. 2018;118:1253–337.
Hanaoka K, Sasakura K, Suwanai Y, Toma-Fukai S, Shimamoto K, Takano Y, et al. Discovery and mechanistic characterization of selective inhibitors of H2S-producing enzyme: 3-mercaptopyruvate sulfurtransferase (3MST) targeting active-site cysteine persulfide. Sci Rep. 2017;7:40227.
Zivanovic J, Kouroussis E, Kohl JB, Adhikari B, Bursac B, Schott-Roux S, et al. Selective persulfide detection reveals evolutionarily conserved antiaging effects of S-sulfhydration. Cell Metab. 2019;30:1152–1170.e13.
Garcia JH, Jain S, Aghi MK. Metabolic drivers of invasion in glioblastoma. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9:683276.
Weng MS, Chang JH, Hung WY, Yang YC, Chien MH. The interplay of reactive oxygen species and the epidermal growth factor receptor in tumor progression and drug resistance. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2018;37:61.
Dustin CM, Heppner DE, Lin MCJ, van der Vliet A. Redox regulation of tyrosine kinase signalling: more than meets the eye. J Biochem. 2020;167:151–63.
Porporato PE, Payen VL, Pérez-Escuredo J, De Saedeleer CJ, Danhier P, Copetti T, et al. A mitochondrial switch promotes tumor metastasis. Cell Rep. 2014;8:754–66.
Augsburger F, Randi EB, Jendly M, Ascencao K, Dilek N, Szabo C. Role of 3-mercaptopyruvate sulfurtransferase in the regulation of proliferation, migration, and bioenergetics in murine colon cancer cells. Biomolecules 2020;10:E447.
Ida T, Sawa T, Ihara H, Tsuchiya Y, Watanabe Y, Kumagai Y, et al. Reactive cysteine persulfides and S-polythiolation regulate oxidative stress and redox signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111:7606–11.
Gao XH, Krokowski D, Guan BJ, Bederman I, Majumder M, Parisien M, et al. Quantitative H2S-mediated protein sulfhydration reveals metabolic reprogramming during the integrated stress response. Elife 2015;4:e10067.
Mustafa AK, Gadalla MM, Sen N, Kim S, Mu W, Gazi SK, et al. H2S signals through protein S-sulfhydration. Sci Signal. 2009;2:ra72.
Silver DJ, Roversi GA, Bithi N, Wang SZ, Troike KM, Neumann CK, et al. Severe consequences of a high-lipid diet include hydrogen sulfide dysfunction and enhanced aggression in glioblastoma. J Clin Invest. 2021;131:138276.
Untereiner AA, Oláh G, Módis K, Hellmich MR, Szabo C. H2S-induced S-sulfhydration of lactate dehydrogenase a (LDHA) stimulates cellular bioenergetics in HCT116 colon cancer cells. Biochem Pharmacol. 2017;136:86–98.
Zuhra K, Tomé CS, Forte E, Vicente JB, Giuffrè A. The multifaceted roles of sulfane sulfur species in cancer-associated processes. Biochim Biophys Acta Bioenerg. 2021;1862:148338.
Yadav PK, Yamada K, Chiku T, Koutmos M, Banerjee R. Structure and kinetic analysis of H2S production by human mercaptopyruvate sulfurtransferase. J Biol Chem. 2013;288:20002–13.
Kimura Y, Koike S, Shibuya N, Lefer D, Ogasawara Y, Kimura H. 3-Mercaptopyruvate sulfurtransferase produces potential redox regulators cysteine- and glutathione-persulfide (Cys-SSH and GSSH) together with signaling molecules H2S2, H2S3 and H2S. Sci Rep. 2017;7:10459.
Josse J. Principal component methods - hierarchical clustering - partitional clustering: why would we need to choose for visualizing data? 2010.
Chen H, Albergante L, Hsu JY, Lareau CA, Lo Bosco G, Guan J, et al. Single-cell trajectories reconstruction, exploration and mapping of omics data with STREAM. Nat Commun. 2019;10:1903.
El-Habr EA, Dubois LG, Burel-Vandenbos F, Bogeas A, Lipecka J, Turchi L, et al. A driver role for GABA metabolism in controlling stem and proliferative cell state through GHB production in glioma. Acta Neuropathol. 2017;133:645–60.
Eskilsson E, Rosland GV, Talasila KM, Knappskog S, Keunen O, Sottoriva A, et al. EGFRvIII mutations can emerge as late and heterogenous events in glioblastoma development and promote angiogenesis through Src activation. Neuro Oncol. 2016;18:1644–55.
Rosenberg S, Verreault M, Schmitt C, Guegan J, Guehennec J, Levasseur C, et al. Multi-omics analysis of primary glioblastoma cell lines shows recapitulation of pivotal molecular features of parental tumors. Neuro Oncol. 2017;19:219–28.
Jacob F, Salinas RD, Zhang DY, Nguyen PTT, Schnoll JG, Wong SZH, et al. A patient-derived glioblastoma organoid model and biobank recapitulates inter- and intra-tumoral heterogeneity. Cell 2020;180:188–204.e22.
Guyon J, Andrique L, Pujol N, Røsland GV, Recher G, Bikfalvi A, et al. A 3D spheroid model for glioblastoma. J Vis Exp. 2020;158.
Courte J, Renault R, Jan A, Viovy JL, Peyrin JM, Villard C. Reconstruction of directed neuronal networks in a microfluidic device with asymmetric microchannels. Methods Cell Biol. 2018;148:71–95.
Renault-Mihara F, Beuvon F, Iturrioz X, Canton B, De Bouard S, Léonard N, et al. Phosphoprotein enriched in astrocytes-15 kDa expression inhibits astrocyte migration by a protein kinase C delta-dependent mechanism. Mol Biol Cell. 2006;17:5141–52.
We are sincerely grateful to Dr M Filipovic and T Vignane (SULFAGING group, ISAS, Dortmund, Germany) for their reagent gift and protocol sharing for protein persulfidation assay. All our thanks to Dr FX Lejeune (ICM, Salpétrière Hospital, Paris) for his advice on statistical analyses, and to V. Junier for creating palettes of distinguishable colors. We acknowledge the contribution of AniRA lentivectors production facility from the CELPHEDIA Infrastructure and SFR Biosciences (UAR 3444/CNRS, US8/Inserm, ENS de Lyon, UCBL, G Froment, D Nègre, and C Costa). We are highly grateful to Dr. A. L’Honoré for access to the Seahorse platform. This work was supported by grants from Région Ile-de-France (MSS fellowship), INCADGOS-Inserm_12560: SiRIC CURAMUS (financially supported by the French National Cancer Institute, the French Ministry of Solidarity and Health and Inserm), and La Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale - Equipe FRM (EQ202003010293).
The authors declare no competing interests.
All the procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments and to the French laws. All samples were obtained with informed consent of patients. Animal experimentation was approved by Comité d’éthique en expérimentation animale Charles Darwin No 5 (Protocol #5379).
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Edited by Dr Pier Giorgio Mastroberardino
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Saurty-Seerunghen, M.S., Daubon, T., Bellenger, L. et al. Glioblastoma cell motility depends on enhanced oxidative stress coupled with mobilization of a sulfurtransferase. Cell Death Dis 13, 913 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-022-05358-8