Synergies of transcription factors, chromatin modifiers and their target genes are vital for cell fate determination in human cancer. Although the importance of numerous epigenetic machinery for regulating gliomagenesis has been previously recognized, how chromatin modifiers collaborate with specific transcription factors remains largely elusive. Herein we report that Pontin chromatin remodelling factor acts as a coactivator for LEF1 to activate TGFβ/SMAD signalling, thereby contributing to gliomagenesis. Pontin is highly expressed in gliomas, and its overexpression paralleled the grade elevation and poor prognosis of patients. Functional studies verified its oncogenic roles in GBM cells by facilitating cell proliferation, survival and invasion both in vitro and in vivo. RNA sequencing results revealed that Pontin regulated multiple target genes involved in TGFβ/SMAD signalling. Intriguingly, we found that Pontin amplified TGFβR2 gene transcription by recruiting LEF1, thereby activating TGFβ/SMAD signalling and facilitating gliomagenesis. Furthermore, higher TGFβR2 expression conferred worse patient outcomes in glioma. To conclude, our study revealed that the Pontin-LEF1 module plays a crucial role in driving TGFβR2 gene transcription, which could be exploited to target TGFβ/SMAD signalling for anti-glioma therapy.
With the highest incidence among primary brain tumours, gliomas are highly lethal and have become a serious health threat worldwide . The most frequent and malignant type of glioma, glioblastoma (GBM, WHO grade IV), is characterized by unlimited proliferation and persistent infiltration, which makes radical surgical resection almost impossible [2, 3]. Its easy relapse nature also causes a dismal prognosis for patients [2, 4]. Therefore, novel therapeutic strategies against malignant gliomas, especially GBM, are urgently needed.
Transforming growth factor-β (TGFβ) is an oncogenic factor in advanced cancers that regulates a vast majority of cellular processes, including proliferation, invasion, angiogenesis and immunosuppression [5,6,7,8]. Upon ligand binding, the TGFβ type II serine/threonine kinase receptor (TβRII) activates the type I receptor (TβRI), initiating an intracellular signalling cascade through phosphorylating specific receptor-regulated SMADs (R-SMADs) SMAD2 and SMAD3. Phosphorylation of SMAD2/3 facilitates their binding to SMAD4, and then the SMAD hetero-oligomer translocates into the nucleus, where it governs target gene transcription [6, 8, 9]. In the TGFβ/SMAD canonical signalling pathway, TβRII is the original receptor switch acting upstream of TβRI. Consequently, the content, stability and membrane distribution of TβRII are critical determinants of both the sensitivity and duration of the TGFβ response.
Pontin, officially named RUVBL1, is a chromatin modifier possessing both ATPase and DNA helicase activities [10,11,12,13]. It has been frequently found to be upregulated in multiple cancer types since its first discovery that its expression was upregulated in hepatocellular carcinoma [14, 15]. A key feature of Pontin is its participation in several conserved macromolecular protein complexes, which are involved in biological processes such as transcription regulation, chromatin remodelling, cell cycle/mitotic progression, DNA repair and cellular motility [16,17,18,19,20]. In transcriptional regulation, emerging evidence supports that Pontin functions as a coactivator for a variety of transcription factors, including androgen receptor (AR), T-cell factor (TCF) and hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α), in corresponding cellular contexts and signalling pathways [21,22,23]. Previously, we reported that Pontin exerted oncogenic roles in glioma by amplifying the E2F1 transcription response and promoting cell cycle progression . However, its implication in gliomagenesis and the possible underlying mechanisms remain unclear.
In this study, we identified the Pontin chromatin remodelling factor as a key regulator of TβRII gene (TGFβR2) transcription, thus controlling TGFβ/SMAD signalling activity and TGFβ–dependent oncogenesis in GBM. Our findings illustrate the oncogenic roles of Pontin in glioma and suggest the possibility of Pontin as a promising prognostic marker and therapeutic target in glioma.
Materials and methods
Specimens from patients
Human clinical samples, including astrocytic gliomas (n = 120) and non-tumoral brain tissues (control, n = 20), were obtained from Tianjin Medical University General Hospital (TMUGH) with written consent. Following surgical resection, samples were immediately formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded until continuous sections (5 μm thick) were prepared for IHC. Histopathological diagnoses of these specimens were completed by at least 2 neuropathologists according to the 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) criteria . The genetic status of IDH1/2 mutations was determined by Sanger sequencing. The clinicopathological characteristics of the 120 glioma patients enrolled in this study are provided in Supplementary Table 1.
Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining
IHC staining was performed with mouse anti-human Pontin (catalogue SAB4200194; Sigma‒Aldrich, USA) and mouse anti-human Ki-67 primary antibodies (sc-23900, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, USA) following previously described procedures [25, 26]. Photographs were taken under a DM6000B microscope (Leica). Pontin or Ki-67 labelling indices (LIs) were determined by calculating the percentage of total cell numbers that were positively stained with Leica Image-Pro Plus 5.0 software.
Cell culturing and reagents
The U87MG cell line was purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, USA). The SNB19, U251, LN229, LN308 and U343 cell lines were obtained from the Chinese Academia Sinica Cell Repository. Isolated from a Chinese patient, the TJ905 cell line was maintained in our lab. The human non-tumoral control cell line UC2 was established by immortalizing astrocytes. All these cells were authenticated and tested for mycoplasma contamination. They were maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium containing 10% foetal bovine serum (Gibco, USA) at 37 °C in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2. Recombinant human TGF-β1 was purchased from Invitrogen (USA), and LY2109761 (TGFβR2 inhibitor) was purchased from Selleck (China).
Lentivirus and stable sub-cell line construction
Knockdown recombinant lentiviruses (puromycin resistance) expressing sh-Pontin (Pontin-kd) or negative control sh-NC (Control-kd) were obtained from GeneChem (China). The overexpression recombinant lentiviruses (blasticidin resistance) expressing Pontin (Pontin-ox), TGFβR2 or empty vector (Control-ox) were purchased from Applied Biological Materials (Canada). U87MG and U251 stable sub-cell lines were constructed by treatment with the corresponding lentivirus and selection under antibiotic (puromycin or blasticidin) resistance.
Western blot and co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP)
Western blot was performed according to our previously described protocols . The primary antibodies were as follows: mouse anti-human Pontin (catalogue SAB4200194; Sigma‒Aldrich), mouse anti-human GAPDH (catalogue BM3876; Boster, China), goat anti-human TGFβRII (catalogue AF-241-NA; Biotechne, USA), rabbit anti-human CTGF (catalogue A11067; Abclonal, China), rabbit anti-human SMAD2/SMAD3 (catalogue 5678; Cell Signaling Technology, USA), rabbit anti-human phospho-SMAD2/SMAD3 (catalogue 8828; Cell Signaling Technology), and rabbit anti-human LEF1 (catalogue 2230; Cell Signaling Technology). Co-IP was conducted as previously described [24, 25]. Briefly, extracts from U87MG and U251 cells were immunoprecipitated with every 2 μg of mouse anti-flag tag antibody (catalogue F3165; Sigma‒Aldrich) for 4–6 h, followed by overnight incubation with protein A/G agarose beads (catalogue sc-2003; Santa Cruz Biotechnology). The conjunct complex was then washed, resuspended in protein sample buffer and subjected to SDS-PAGE. Then, target interacting proteins were revealed by immunoblot. Uncropped images for western blots are provided in the Supplementary Material.
RNA extraction and quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR)
Total RNA from clinical samples and various kinds of cells was isolated with TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, USA) according to standard procedures. A total of 2.0 μg of RNA from each sample was subjected to reverse transcription (RT) by applying the M-MLV RT System (Promega, USA). The abundance of the target mRNA was measured by qRT-PCR employing GoTaq quantitative PCR Master Mix (Promega), and ACTB, which encodes β-actin, was used as the housekeeping gene. Primer sequences are provided in Supplementary Table 2. The 2−ΔΔCt method was applied to calculate the relative mRNA expression (fold change).
Cellular assays for proliferation, survival, migration and invasion
CCK-8 and 5-ethynyl-2’-deoxyuridine (EdU) staining assays were performed to evaluate cell proliferation as described previously [25, 27]. A colony formation assay was performed to measure the anchorage-dependent cell growth ability, which reflected cell survival. Standard procedures were followed as described previously . Transwell assays were conducted to determine cell migration and invasion capacities as described previously [25, 26].
Tumour xenograft assay
Four-week-old female BALB/C athymic nude mice (National Laboratory Animal Center, Beijing, China) were anaesthetized and transplanted intracranially with the indicated U87MG stable sub-cell lines (3 × 105 cells per mouse, n = 5 for each group). Tumour growth was detected by bioluminescent imaging every week (Days 7, 14, 21 and 28). No randomization was used. No blinding was done. Tumour growth and survival situation of each mouse was recorded. Following sacrifice, brains were separated for haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and IHC staining.
Plasmids, transfection and luciferase reporter assay
The plasmid expressing full-length tagged human Pontin or LEF1 was constructed using the pcCMV-tag2b (Pontin) or pcDNA3.0-HA (LEF1) vector. TGFβ/SMAD signalling responsive CAGA12 reporter and TGFBR2 promoter (−2000 to 0) reporter plasmids were constructed and synthesized by Genscript (Nanjing, China). Lipofectamine 3000 (Invitrogen, USA) was used for plasmid transfection. A luciferase reporter assay was performed according to the protocol provided by the manufacturer. Values are expressed as the means ± SDs from three independent experiments.
Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay
Possible LEF1-binding sites in the TGFBR2 promoter (−2000 to 0) were predicted by using JASPAR (http://jaspar.genereg.net/). An EZ-Magna-ChIP™ Kit (Millipore, USA) was used to conduct ChIP assays following the instructions provided by the manufacturer. Briefly, U87MG cells (5 × 106) were first cross-linked with formaldehyde (1%), followed by chromatin digestion with micrococcal nuclease. The input reference of each experiment was saved as 2% aliquots of total lysates. Then, the other lysates were incubated with 8 μg of LEF1 antibody (catalogue ab137872; Abcam, USA) or control rabbit IgG (catalogue 12-370; Sigma‒Aldrich) at 4 °C overnight. NaCl plus proteinase K was used to reverse the cross-linked DNA. Finally, objective DNA was amplified from the recovered immunoprecipitated DNA at the previous step by qPCR. Sequences of the specific qPCR primers for the TGFBR2 gene are shown in Supplementary Table 3.
Immunofluorescence (IF) staining
Cells seeded on coverslips were fixed with paraformaldehyde (4%), permeabilized with Triton X-100 (0.2%), and stained as described previously . Mouse anti-human Pontin antibody (catalogue SAB4200194; Sigma‒Aldrich) and rabbit anti-human LEF1 antibody (catalogue 2230; Cell Signaling Technology) were used as the primary antibodies. The secondary antibodies, including the TRITC-labelled goat anti-mouse IgG antibody (catalogue A16071) and FITC-labelled goat anti-rabbit IgG antibody (catalogue F-2765), were both purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific. Cell nuclei were stained with DAPI. High-quality images were obtained under an FV-1000 laser-scanning confocal microscope (Olympus).
Paired-end RNA sequencing of total RNA extracted from control (sh-NC) and Pontin knockdown (sh-Pontin) groups of U87MG cells was conducted using the Illumina HiSeq 2000 system. Sample preparation, library building, read mapping, transcriptome reconstruction, and data analysis for differentially expressed coding genes were performed sequentially, as we previously described [24, 25, 28].
Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS 21.0 software (IBM, USA). Data are represented as the means ± SDs. Two-tailed Student’s t-test, one-way ANOVA, Pearson correlation analysis, Kaplan‒Meier analysis and log-rank test were applied to analyse the corresponding data. Statistical significance was assigned at P ≤ 0.05. All cellular experiments were performed at least three times with triplicate samples.
Pontin is upregulated in gliomas, and its higher expression predicts worse patient outcome
Previously we found that Pontin mRNA was obviously upregulated in a large proportion of cancers, including GBMs and lower-grade gliomas (LGGs) . To comprehensively evaluate its implication in gliomagenesis, a total of 20 non-tumoral brains and 120 gliomas with detailed patients’ clinical features were investigated in this study. IHC revealed that Pontin localized in the nucleus, and its higher expression paralleled the increase in glioma grade progression (Fig. 1a, b). In addition, a higher Pontin expression level was obviously associated with the proliferation index (Ki-67 LI; r = 0.7701, P < 0.0001; Fig. 1c), suggesting its importance in glioma cell proliferation. Kaplan‒Meier (KM) analyses revealed that higher Pontin expression predicted worse outcomes reflected by shorter disease-free survival (DFS; P < 0.0001) and overall survival (OS; P < 0.0001; Fig. 1d). When dividing these patients into cohorts according to age (age ≥ 50, age < 50), isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 (IDH1/2) genotype (IDH1/2 wild-type, IDH1 R132H) and Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS; <90, ≥90), we still observed an evident association between higher Pontin levels and worse patient prognosis (DFS: P < 0.01~0.0001; OS: P < 0.05~0.0001; Fig. 1e–h, Supplementary Fig. 1a, b). Moreover, Pontin upregulation was also significantly correlated with older age (P < 0.05), advanced grade (P < 0.0001), higher Ki-67 LI (P < 0.0001) and wild-type IDH1/2 status (P < 0.0001; Table 1). The following Cox regression analysis indicated that the Pontin LI, similar to the Ki-67 LI, was also an independent predictor of DFS and OS in glioma patients (Supplementary Tables 4, 5). Western blot of Pontin expression among GBM cell lines verified its upregulation in GBM cell lines compared with that in the control UC2 immortal astrocyte cell line (Supplementary Fig. 1c). Taken together, these results clearly demonstrated that Pontin upregulation is highly involved in glioma progression, and Pontin might serve as a promising prognostic factor for predicting worse patient outcome.
Pontin promotes GBM cell proliferation and survival
To assess the effects of Pontin on gliomagenesis, we first performed cell proliferation assays (CCK-8 and EdU staining) and clonogenic survival assays (colony formation) in vitro. Two groups of Pontin knockdown sub-cell lines (kd1 and kd2) were constructed first by infecting U87MG and U251 cells with two independent shRNAs. Moreover, two groups of Pontin-overexpressing sub-cell lines (ox1, ox2) were obtained by infecting U87MG and U251 cells with 2 doses (MOI = 5, MOI = 10) of the Pontin overexpression lentivirus. Afterwards, we validated the efficient knockdown or overexpression of Pontin by qRT‒PCR and western blot (Supplementary Fig. 2a and Fig. 2a). Subsequent functional assays showed that, compared with the control or mock cells, Pontin knockdown inhibited GBM cell proliferation and survival, whereas Pontin overexpression facilitated GBM cell proliferation and survival (Supplementary Fig. 2b, Fig. 2b, c). These data confirm our previous conclusion that Pontin contributes to GBM cell growth in vitro.
Pontin increases the invasive ability and tumorigenic potential of GBM cells
As is known, the infiltrating nature of GBM generally results in dismal prognoses [2,3,4]. We, therefore, sought to investigate whether Pontin affected GBM cell migration and invasion properties in vitro. The results from the transwell assays showed that Pontin knockdown suppressed, while its overexpression promoted, the migration and invasion of GBM cells (Fig. 3a). In the animal experiments, equal amounts of the abovementioned four groups of U87MG sub-cell lines (control-kd, Pontin-kd2, Control-ox and Pontin-ox2) were orthotopically transplanted into nude mice. Bioluminescence imaging showed that mice transplanted with Pontin-kd cells bore smaller tumours, whereas Pontin-ox cells bore larger tumours (Fig. 3b, c, Supplementary Fig. 3a). IHC verified that Pontin-kd xenografts retained Pontin silencing, while Pontin-ox xenografts expressed the highest level of Pontin (Supplementary Fig. 3a, b). The Ki-67 proliferation index exhibited an alteration tendency similar to that of Pontin (Supplementary Fig. 3a, b), indicating that Pontin affected GBM cell proliferation in vivo. Prominently, HE staining showed that xenografts formed by Pontin-kd cells barely exhibited any invasion abilities, while obvious invasion occurred in the Pontin-ox group (Fig. 3d). The KM results indicated that Pontin knockdown prolonged the OS of the mice, while its overexpression shortened the OS (Fig. 3e). Collectively, these results illustrated that Pontin possesses oncogenic roles in gliomagenesis by promoting cell proliferation and invasion.
Pontin is associated with TGFβ signalling activation
Previously, we carried out RNA sequencing experiments using the control (Control-kd) and Pontin knockdown (Pontin-kd) U87MG sub-cell lines . In retrospect of the differential expression of the coding genes between the two groups, we observed that those downregulated genes upon Pontin knockdown were mainly associated with functions such as chromatin organization, cell cycle and TGFβ signalling (Fig. 4a, b). In addition to the association of Pontin with E2F targets as described previously , gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) also implied noteworthy correlations between Pontin and the G2/M checkpoint, TGFβ signalling, epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), etc (Fig. 4c). The following qRT‒PCR validation confirmed the results from the RNA-seq analysis: Pontin promoted the expression of genes implicated in chromatin organization, cell cycle/cell division, and TGFβ signalling, whereas it suppressed the expression of genes associated with MAPK inactivation (Fig. 4d). It is well known that the TGFβ signalling pathway commonly exerts oncogenic potential and serves as an ideal therapeutic target for advanced cancers, including GBM [5, 6, 8, 29]. Therefore, through our preliminary screening by RNA-seq, we considered that Pontin might contribute to gliomagenesis by activating TGFβ signalling.
Pontin is required to sustain TGFβ/SMAD signalling and is critical for TGFβ-induced GBM cell proliferation and invasion
The results above suggested that Pontin might affect TGFβ/SMAD signalling at the level of TGFβR2, since both RNA-seq analysis and qRT‒PCR validation confirmed that Pontin knockdown caused TGFβR2 mRNA reduction (Fig. 4b, d). As the first signalling molecule engaged by the TGFβ ligand, cell surface TGFβR2 is thought to be required for all TGFβ signalling responses. Western blot analysis revealed that Pontin knockdown led to downregulation of TGFβR2, phosphorylated SMAD2/3 (p-SMAD2/3) and CTGF, a well-known target of the TGFβ/SMAD signalling pathway in U87MG and U251 cells (Fig. 5a). TGFβ treatment activated the downstream SMAD-dependent signalling in control cells, manifesting as elevated p-SMAD2/3 and CTGF levels, whereas Pontin-silenced cells did not respond to or responded only slightly to TGFβ treatment, manifesting as lower p-SMAD2/3 and CTGF levels than the control groups (Fig. 5a and Supplementary Fig. 4). In contrast, Pontin-overexpressing cells exhibited higher levels of p-SMAD2/3 and CTGF, and they exhibited more activated TGFβ/SMAD signalling in response to TGFβ treatment, although the TGFβR2 inhibitor LY2109761 abrogated this effect (Supplementary Fig. 4). Evaluation of the expression of well-characterized direct transcriptional gene targets of TGFβ/SMAD signalling, i.e. CTGF, CDK17, THBS1, ID3 and RIF1, by qRT‒PCR led to the same conclusion: Pontin knockdown led to TGFβ/SMAD signalling suppression (Fig. 5b). Consistently, Pontin knockdown decreased the luciferase activity of the TGFβ-induced SMAD3/4-driven CAGA12-luc transcriptional reporter . In contrast, overexpression of Pontin increased the CAGA12-luc reporter activity (Fig. 5c).
Acting via specific receptors (TGFβR1 and TGFβR2), TGFβ stimulates GBM cell growth and invasion by activating a range of pathways and commonly leads to SMAD2/3 phosphorylation, which ultimately cooperates with SMAD4 mediator [29, 31]. Accordingly, Pontin-silenced U87MG cells exhibited reduced proliferation and invasion capacities (Fig. 5d). Upon knockdown of Pontin, the TGFβ-induced proliferation and invasion promotion were attenuated, while LY2109761 abolished the differences in proliferation and invasion between the control and Pontin knockdown groups (Fig. 5d). Ectopic expression of Pontin had the reverse effect: Pontin promoted GBM cell proliferation and invasion in response to TGFβ (Fig. 5e). Therefore, our findings suggested that Pontin is required to sustain TGFβ/SMAD signalling and is critical for TGFβ-induced GBM cell proliferation and invasion.
Pontin acts as a coactivator for LEF1-dependent TGFβR2 gene transcription
Despite recent progress in elucidating the roles of TGFβ/SMAD signalling in cancers, the regulation of TGFβ type II receptor (TGFβR2) remains uncertain. From the above results, we observed that Pontin facilitated TGFβR2 expression at both the mRNA and protein levels (Figs. 4d and 5a). As Pontin could act as a coactivator for various transcription factors to control the transcription of target genes [15, 16, 21,22,23], we hypothesized that Pontin might regulate TGFβR2 gene transcription by recruiting one possible transcription factor. Conjoint predictions of possible Pontin interactors by BioGRID (https://thebiogrid.org/; n = 274) and transcription factors (TFs) that might govern TGFβR2 gene transcription by JASPAR (http://jaspar.genereg.net/; n = 61) implied that LEF1 might interact with Pontin to control TGFβR2 gene transcription (Fig. 6a). IF detection revealed that Pontin colocalized with LEF1 in the nucleus (Fig. 6b). Co-IP results also indicated that Pontin indeed interacted with LEF1 in GBM cells (Fig. 6c).
We then performed luciferase reporter assays with the reporter derived from the wild-type TGFβR2 promoter (−2000 to 0 from the transcription initiation site). Knockdown of Pontin attenuated the promoter activity. Consistent with this finding, overexpression of either Pontin or LEF1 increased the promoter activity, and co-overexpression of Pontin and LEF1 reinforced this increase by nearly twofold (Fig. 6d). TGFβ treatment obviously amplified the luciferase activities and still caused similar alterations among these groups (Fig. 6d).
Bioinformatics analysis of the TGFβR2 promoter (−2000 to 0) by JASPAR revealed 2 potential LEF1-binding sites in the TGFβR2 promoter (Fig. 6e, left; R1 and R2). ChIP‒qPCR verified that Pontin bound to both LEF1-binding sites in the TGFβR2 promoter. Upon Pontin knockdown, the enrichment at R1 and R2 was significantly decreased (Fig. 6e, middle). Specifically, Pontin overexpression increased the enrichment at R1 and R2; furthermore, co-overexpression of Pontin and LEF1 reinforced this increase (Fig. 6e, right). These results confirmed that Pontin can upregulate TGFβR2 gene transcription by recruiting LEF1 to the TGFβR2 promoter. In other words, Pontin acts as a coactivator for LEF1.
Pontin induces GBM malignancy via TGFβR2, and higher TGFβR2 expression confers worse patient outcome
To confirm that Pontin promotes gliomagenesis by enhancing TGFβR2 gene transcription, we rescued TGFβR2 expression in the Pontin-silenced cells by stably transfecting empty vector (vec) or TGFβR2 plasmid into the control (Control-kd) or Pontin-silenced (Pontin-kd) cells (Fig. 7a). We found that TGFβR2 restoration also recovered TGFβ/SMAD signalling, as reflected by p-SMAD2/3, CTGF and TGFβ target gene expression (Fig. 7a, b). Cellular assays verified that restoration of TGFβR2 obviously rescued the inhibitory effects of Pontin silencing on GBM cell proliferation, survival and invasion (Fig. 7c), illustrating the significance of Pontin-regulated TGFβR2 transcription in glioma progression.
Subsequently, we verified whether TGFβR2 mediated the tumour-promoting effects of Pontin in vivo. The aforementioned three groups of U87MG sub-cell lines (Control-kd+vec, Pontin-kd+vec and Pontin-kd+TGFβR2) were transplanted into nude mice. In accordance with the above cellular results, TGFβR2 abrogated the suppressive effects of Pontin silencing on xenograft growth and invasion and prolonged the survival of the mice as the controls (Fig. 8a–c).
We then examined the expression of TGFβR2 in human gliomas by analysing the online GEPIA data. The results in Fig. 8d indicated that TGFβR2 mRNA was increased in both GBMs and LGGs in comparison to corresponding normal brains. KM analysis showed that patients possessing TGFβR2 overexpression had remarkably shorter OS (Fig. 8e). Collectively, these data concluded that Pontin increases GBM malignancy by upregulating TGFβR2, whose overexpression confers worse patient prognosis for glioma patients.
The present work is an extension of the Pontin chromatin modifier in GBM study and builds upon the first preliminary investigation by Wang et al. . In this study, we confirmed the upregulation of Pontin in glioma and further verified its correlation with glioma progression and patient prognosis. More convincing evidence proved that Pontin promoted gliomagenesis by facilitating cell proliferation and invasion. Mechanistically, Pontin amplified TGFβR2 gene transcription by recruiting LEF1, thereby activating TGFβ/SMAD signalling and contributing to GBM malignancy (Fig. 9).
Accumulating evidence supports Pontin upregulation in malignancies , but few studies have evaluated the clinical significance of Pontin in cancers. Using the public online resources, we previously found the overexpression of Pontin and its poor prognosis predicting significance for glioma patients . Herein, by conducting IHC of 20 non-tumoral brains and 120 gliomas with detailed clinical features, we confirmed the upregulation of Pontin in glioma and verified its positive correlation with advanced glioma grade, high proliferation index and short patient survival. Therefore, increased Pontin expression might serve as a promising prognostic biomarker in gliomas.
Implicated in a wide range of biological processes, Pontin is known to be crucial for oncogenesis by participating in transcription control, chromatin remodelling, cell cycle/mitotic progression, DNA repair and cellular motility [16,17,18,19,20]. In our previous study, we showed that Pontin facilitated glioma progression by accelerating cell cycle progression and cell growth. Nevertheless, in vivo experiments were lacking . Herein, we provide solid in vitro and in vivo evidence that Pontin exerts oncogenic roles in GBM by enhancing cell proliferation, survival and invasion.
Pontin is well recognized for its involvement in transcription regulation in numerous cellular contexts [16, 21,22,23]. As we have shown previously, Pontin interacted with E2F1, increased E2F1-dependent transcription and promoted the expression of E2F1 targets in GBM cells . We believe that the tight interaction of Pontin-E2F1 to activate downstream target transcription represents a vital pathway but not the only one account for the oncogenic roles of Pontin. Data mining of the RNA-seq results derived from Pontin-silenced cells and control cells raised another possibility, which is that Pontin might positively affect TGFβ/SMAD signalling. Functional studies revealed that Pontin was required to sustain TGFβ/SMAD signalling and was critical for TGFβ-induced GBM cell proliferation and invasion.
TGFβ signalling is hyperactivated in advanced cancers [7, 8, 31]. TGFβR2 is the first signalling molecule engaged by the TGFβ ligand, and its cell surface content determines the activating degree of all TGFβ signalling responses. Our careful exploration found that Pontin facilitated TGFβR2 mRNA and protein expression concurrently. More detailed experiments revealed that Pontin could induce TGFβR2 gene transcription by recruiting LEF1 to the TGFβR2 promoter. In brief, Pontin might be a coactivator for LEF1-dependent TGFβR2 gene transcription. Importantly, subsequent rescue experiments clearly proved that TGFβR2 was a key factor mediating the oncogenic roles of Pontin in GBM cells since its restoration effectively restored TGFβ/SMAD signalling, as well as GBM malignancy both in vitro and in vivo.
Lymphoid enhancer-binding factor-1 (LEF1) belongs to the TCF/LEF1 family of high mobility transcription factors. It principally participates in the Wnt/β-catenin signalling pathway . A couple of studies have reported LEF1 overexpression in glioma, lung cancer and oral squamous cell carcinoma. Abnormal LEF1 overexpression was strongly linked to tumorigenesis and might predict poor patient prognosis [33,34,35]. Specifically, LEF1 promotes cancer cell proliferation, viability and EMT, a key characteristic of cancer cell migration and invasion [32, 36]. Our results clearly showed that Pontin cooperated with LEF1 to promote TGFβR2 gene transcription, thereby activating TGFβ/SMAD signalling and enhancing GBM malignancy. The linkage of LEF1 with TGFβ/SMAD signalling has also been observed in oesophagal squamous cell carcinoma by Zhao et al. .
In summary, our comprehensive findings on Pontin elucidate its functions and molecular mechanism in promoting gliomagenesis. Collaboration with LEF1 to activate TGFβR2 gene transcription is a vital mechanism underlying the tumour-promoting capacities of Pontin. Together, our results verify that Pontin acts as a crucial oncogene by recruiting LEF1 to amplify TGFβR2 transcription and activate TGFβ/SMAD signalling. Our investigation reveals the probability of targeting Pontin for anti-glioma therapy.
All data are available upon request of the corresponding author.
Brodbelt A, Greenberg D, Winters T, Williams M, Vernon S, Collins VP, et al. Glioblastoma in England: 2007-2011. Eur J Cancer. 2015;51:533–42.
Omuro A, DeAngelis LM. Glioblastoma and other malignant gliomas: a clinical review. JAMA. 2013;310:1842–50.
Louis DN, Perry A, Reifenberger G, von Deimling A, Figarella-Branger D, Cavenee WK, et al. The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary. Acta Neuropathol. 2016;131:803–20.
Lin L, Cai J, Jiang C. Recent advances in targeted therapy for glioma. Curr Med Chem. 2017;24:1365–81.
Derynck R, Turley SJ, Akhurst RJ. TGFbeta biology in cancer progression and immunotherapy. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2021;18:9–34.
Ikushima H, Miyazono K. TGFbeta signalling: a complex web in cancer progression. Nat Rev Cancer. 2010;10:415–24.
Massague J. TGFbeta in cancer. Cell. 2008;134:215–30.
Syed V. TGF-beta signaling in cancer. J Cell Biochem. 2016;117:1279–87.
Massague J, Seoane J, Wotton D. Smad transcription factors. Genes Dev. 2005;19:2783–810.
Choi J, Heo K, An W. Cooperative action of TIP48 and TIP49 in H2A.Z exchange catalyzed by acetylation of nucleosomal H2A. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37:5993–6007.
Puri T, Wendler P, Sigala B, Saibil H, Tsaneva IR. Dodecameric structure and ATPase activity of the human TIP48/TIP49 complex. J Mol Biol. 2007;366:179–92.
Gribun A, Cheung KL, Huen J, Ortega J, Houry WA. Yeast Rvb1 and Rvb2 are ATP-dependent DNA helicases that form a heterohexameric complex. J Mol Biol. 2008;376:1320–33.
Makino Y, Kanemaki M, Kurokawa Y, Koji T, Tamura T. A rat RuvB-like protein, TIP49a, is a germ cell-enriched novel DNA helicase. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:15329–35.
Grigoletto A, Lestienne P, Rosenbaum J. The multifaceted proteins Reptin and Pontin as major players in cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2011;1815:147–57.
Mao YQ, Houry WA. The role of Pontin and Reptin in cellular physiology and cancer etiology. Front Mol Biosci. 2017;4:58.
Gallant P. Control of transcription by Pontin and Reptin. Trends Cell Biol. 2007;17:187–92.
Jha S, Dutta A. RVB1/RVB2: running rings around molecular biology. Mol Cell. 2009;34:521–33.
Kakihara Y, Saeki M. The R2TP chaperone complex: its involvement in snoRNP assembly and tumorigenesis. Biomol Concepts. 2014;5:513–20.
Nano N, Houry WA. Chaperone-like activity of the AAA+ proteins Rvb1 and Rvb2 in the assembly of various complexes. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2013;368:20110399.
Rosenbaum J, Baek SH, Dutta A, Houry WA, Huber O, Hupp TR, et al. The emergence of the conserved AAA+ ATPases Pontin and Reptin on the signaling landscape. Sci Signal. 2013;6:mr1.
Feng Y, Lee N, Fearon ER. TIP49 regulates beta-catenin-mediated neoplastic transformation and T-cell factor target gene induction via effects on chromatin remodeling. Cancer Res. 2003;63:8726–34.
Kim JH, Lee JM, Nam HJ, Choi HJ, Yang JW, Lee JS, et al. SUMOylation of pontin chromatin-remodeling complex reveals a signal integration code in prostate cancer cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:20793–8.
Lee JS, Kim Y, Bhin J, Shin HJ, Nam HJ, Lee SH, et al. Hypoxia-induced methylation of a pontin chromatin remodeling factor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:13510–5.
Wang R, Li X, Sun C, Yu L, Hua D, Shi C, et al. The ATPase Pontin is a key cell cycle regulator by amplifying E2F1 transcription response in glioma. Cell Death Dis. 2021;12:141.
Zhou X, Wang R, Li X, Yu L, Hua D, Sun C, et al. Splicing factor SRSF1 promotes gliomagenesis via oncogenic splice-switching of MYO1B. J Clin Invest. 2019;129:676–93.
Li H, Yu L, Liu J, Bian X, Shi C, Sun C, et al. miR-320a functions as a suppressor for gliomas by targeting SND1 and beta-catenin, and predicts the prognosis of patients. Oncotarget. 2017;8:19723–37.
Zhou X, Li X, Yu L, Wang R, Hua D, Shi C, et al. The RNA-binding protein SRSF1 is a key cell cycle regulator via stabilizing NEAT1 in glioma. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2019;113:75–86.
Zhou X, Li X, Cheng Y, Wu W, Xie Z, Xi Q, et al. BCLAF1 and its splicing regulator SRSF10 regulate the tumorigenic potential of colon cancer cells. Nat Commun. 2014;5:4581.
Birch JL, Coull BJ, Spender LC, Watt C, Willison A, Syed N, et al. Multifaceted transforming growth factor-beta (TGFbeta) signalling in glioblastoma. Cell Signal. 2020;72:109638.
Zhang L, Zhou F, Garcia de Vinuesa A, de Kruijf EM, Mesker WE, Hui L, et al. TRAF4 promotes TGF-beta receptor signaling and drives breast cancer metastasis. Mol Cell. 2013;51:559–72.
Joseph JV, Balasubramaniyan V, Walenkamp A, Kruyt FA. TGF-beta as a therapeutic target in high grade gliomas—promises and challenges. Biochem Pharmacol. 2013;85:478–85.
Santiago L, Daniels G, Wang D, Deng FM, Lee P. Wnt signaling pathway protein LEF1 in cancer, as a biomarker for prognosis and a target for treatment. Am J Cancer Res. 2017;7:1389–406.
Gao X, Mi Y, Ma Y, Jin W. LEF1 regulates glioblastoma cell proliferation, migration, invasion, and cancer stem-like cell self-renewal. Tumour Biol. 2014;35:11505–11.
Bleckmann A, Siam L, Klemm F, Rietkotter E, Wegner C, Kramer F, et al. Nuclear LEF1/TCF4 correlate with poor prognosis but not with nuclear beta-catenin in cerebral metastasis of lung adenocarcinomas. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2013;30:471–82.
Su MC, Chen CT, Huang FI, Chen YL, Jeng YM, Lin CY. Expression of LEF1 is an independent prognostic factor for patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma. J Formos Med Assoc. 2014;113:934–9.
Liang J, Li X, Li Y, Wei J, Daniels G, Zhong X, et al. LEF1 targeting EMT in prostate cancer invasion is mediated by miR-181a. Am J Cancer Res. 2015;5:1124–32.
Zhao Y, Zhu J, Shi B, Wang X, Lu Q, Li C, et al. The transcription factor LEF1 promotes tumorigenicity and activates the TGF-beta signaling pathway in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2019;38:304.
This study was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81672592, 81872061, 81972354, 82072772, 82172901, 82172903 and 82273019), the Programs of Science and Technology Bureau Foundation of Tianjin Municipality (No. 18JCYBJC92100, 19JCZDJC64900 (Z) and 21JCQNJC01440), the Program of Tianjin Municipal Health Bureau (No. 15KG147), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. 3332021084), the Program of Cancer Foundation of China (No. CFC2020kyxm003) and the Tianjin Key Medical Discipline (Specialty) Construction Project (No. TJYXZDXK-061B)—General Project of Tianjin Lung Cancer Institute (No. TJLCMS2021-03).
The authors declare no competing interests.
Human surgical specimens were collected from TMUGH with written consent. IHC on human samples were carried out in accordance with the principles of the Helsinki Declaration and approved by the Ethics Committee of TMUGH. All animal experiments were performed according to protocols approved by the Ethics Committee of TMUGH.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Edited by Professor Anastasis Stephanou
About this article
Cite this article
Zhou, X., Li, X., Wang, R. et al. Recruitment of LEF1 by Pontin chromatin modifier amplifies TGFBR2 transcription and activates TGFβ/SMAD signalling during gliomagenesis. Cell Death Dis 13, 818 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-022-05265-y