Abstract
Abnormal angiogenesis occurs during the growth of solid tumors resulting in increased vascular permeability to fluids and metastatic cancer cells. Anti-angiogenesis therapy for solid tumors is effective in the treatment of cancer patients. However, the efficacy of anti-angiogenesis therapy is limited by drug resistance. The findings of the current study showed that HIF1α R282 is methylated by PRMT3, which is necessary for its stabilization and oncogene function. Analysis showed that PRMT3-mediated tumorigenesis is HIF1α methylation-dependent. A novel therapeutic molecule (MPG-peptide) was used to inhibit HIF1α expression. These findings provided information on PRMT3 signaling pathway and HIF1/VEGFA signaling pathway and offer a novel therapeutic strategy for colorectal cancer, mainly for treatment of anti-angiogenesis resistance patients.
Similar content being viewed by others
Background
Angiogenesis is one of the hallmarks of cancer, and is characterized by sprouting of new blood vessels from pre-existing blood vessels [1, 2]. Tumor growth is characterized by insufficient supply of nutrients and oxygen, and poor clearance of metabolic waste [1, 3]. Hypoxia promotes tumor angiogenesis, resulting in malignant phenotype and aggressive tumor behavior [4, 5]. Pathological angiogenesis is driven by abnormal expression of pro-angiogenic factors, and solid tumor vessels are tortuous, disorganized, and permeable [4, 6]. Abnormal angiogenesis of solid tumors increases vascular permeability, enhances high interstitial fluid pressure, and reduces blood perfusion and oxygenation [2, 7, 8].
Hypoxia-induced factor 1α (HIF1α) is a pro-angiogenic factor characterized by abnormal overexpression under low oxygenation levels (hypoxia) in tissues, promoting expression of several pro-angiogenic factors [5, 9, 10]. Under normoxia, HIF1α is hydrolyzed by prolyl hydroxylase domain protein 2 (PHD2). Hydrolyzed-HIF1α can be poly-ubiquitinated by Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) complex, and the poly-ubiquitinated-HIF1α is further degraded by proteasome [11,12,13]. However, under hypoxia, PHD2 loses its enzyme activity, and HIF1α escapes from degradation, binds to DNA with its co-activators and promotes transcription of genes, such as VEGFA, PDGF-B, erythropoietin (EPO), and GLUT-1 [14,15,16,17].
Protein arginine methyltransferases 3 (PRMT3) is a type-I PRMT family member, with a unique N-terminal C2H2 zinc finger motif and is localized in the cytoplasm [18, 19]. PRMT3 is related to ribosome small subunit and was first reported in fission yeast [20]. Although PRTM3 is widely distributed, only a few studies have explored its biological function in tumorigenesis.
HIF1α expression level is regulated by multiple posttranslational modifications, such as hydroxylation, acetylation, ubiquitination, phosphorylation, and lysine methylation [21,22,23,24]. The current study explored a novel HIF1α modification through arginine methylation. The findings indicate that PRMT3 is upregulated in colorectal cancer (CRC) tissues compared with adjacent normal tissue and its expression is negatively correlated with overall survival time of patients. Furthermore, analysis showed that R282 of HIF1α is asymmetrically di-methylated by PRMT3, and R282 asymmetric di-methylation of HIF1α decreases its HIF-1α poly-ubiquitination level, but not its hydroxylation level. Moreover, the findings showed that PRMT3-mediated tumorigenesis is HIF1α R282 methylation-dependent. Deletion of HIF1α R282 methylation significantly inhibits tumor progression and angiogenesis. These findings indicate that HIF1α is a novel target for colorectal tumor treatment.
Material and methods
Antibodies, cell lines, and reagents
RKO, LoVo, HEK293T, and HUVEC cell lines were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA). Antibodies against PRMT3 (Abcam; ab191562), GAPDH (Abcam; ab9485), H4R3me2a (Abcam; ab194683), histone 4 (Abclone; A1131), VEGFA (Abclone; A12303), HIF1α (cell signaling technology; #36169); HIF1β (cell signaling technology; #3718), flag-tag (cell signaling technology; #14793), stat3 (cell signaling technology; #9139), Y705-p-stat3 (cell signaling technology; #9145), β-actin (cell signaling technology; #3700) were used in the current study. SGC707 (HY-19715) was obtained from MedChemExpress company. All cell lines were authenticated by STR profiling and there was no mycoplasma contamination.
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA)
ELISA kit (RK00023) was purchased from Abclone company. ELISA assays were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Wound healing assay
Pre-treated cells were seeded in a 6-well plate and cultured to 95% confluency. A linear wound was made on the plate using a sterile pipette tip. The wound diameter was then determined at the indicated times.
Transwell assay
Transwell chambers (8 mm) were purchased from Costar, Cambridge, United Kingdom. 4 × 104 (for normoxia) or 10 × 104 (for hypoxia) cells in 250 µL serum-free medium were seeded in the upper chamber, and 400 µL conditional mediums were added to the lower chamber. After culturing for 12–16 h, cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and stained with 0.5% crystal violet. Cell number was determined using a microscope.
CCK8 assays
CCK8 kit (RM02823) was purchased from Abclone company. CCK8 assays were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Western blots analysis and Immunoprecipitation (IP)
Pre-treated cells were obtained and washed twice with cold PBS. The cells were then lysed using NP-40 lysis buffer for 30 min at 4 °C. Protein concentration was determined using bicinchoninic acid assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Proteins were separated by electrophoresis using a premade sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide minigel (Tris-HCL SDS-PAGE) and then transferred to PVDF membranes. The membranes were incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C and then further incubated with secondary antibodies. The signal was detected using the chemiluminescence method. For immunoprecipitation, extracted proteins were incubated with identified antibodies overnight at 4 °C and then centrifuged with protein A/G beads for 2–4 h at 4 °C. The beads were then washed thrice using NP-40 lysis buffer, and western blot assays were performed.
Cell cycle analysis
Cells were washed with cold PBS, and then fixed in 80% ethanol overnight at −20 °C. Cells were stained with PI at room temperature for 5–10 min. Cell cycle distribution was measured using BD Biosciences System.
Cell apoptosis analysis
Annexin V-FITC/PI staining kit were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Cell apoptosis assays were conducted according to the manufacturer’s instructions, followed by flow cytometry to examine apoptosis (BD Biosciences).
Quantitative Real-time PCR
Total RNA was isolated using TRIzol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to manufacturer’s protocol. The RNA was reverse transcribed using ABScript II kit (Abclone; RK20402) to obtain cDNA. Real-time PCR assays were conducted and RT-PCR kit (Abclone; RK21203) and analyzed using Multi-color Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Primers used are listed as followed: PRMT3 (forward: 5-GTACCCTTCTCATACCCCAATGG-3;backward:5-GACGAGCAGGTTCTGACATCT-3),HIF1α(5-GAACGTCGAAAAGAAAAGTCTCG-3;backward:5-CCTTATCAAGATGCGAACTCACA-3),VEGFA(5-AGGGCAGAATCATCACGAAGT-3;backward:5-AGGGTCTCGATTGGATGGCA-3),beta-actin(5-CATGTACGTTGCTATCCAGGC-3; backward: 5-CTCCTTAATGTCACGCACGAT-3).
Colorectal tumor clinic samples
Primary tumor and adjacent normal tissues were harvested from colorectal cancer patients who underwent surgical operation without preoperative chemoradiotherapy at Qilu Hospital of Shandong University and samples were stored at −80 °C. The inclusion and exclusion criteria are listed as followed:1). primary tumor is colorectal cancer. 2). no preoperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy. 3). patients are firstly diagnosed with colorectal cancer, without other malignancy. 4). the tumor of patients can be cut off. The informed consents were obtained from all patients. This study was approved by Shandong University Ethical Review Committee.
Construction of lentiviral-infected cell lines
pLKO-AS3w-encoding-identified gene, MD2-G, and PPAX three-pack system were used to generate a high-expression virus. In addition, PLKO.1, MD2-G, and PPAX three-pack system were used to silence gene expression in the virus. Sequences for shPRMT3 were as follows: shPRMT3#1: 5′-CCTTGTGGTATTAAGCATATA-3′; shPRMT3#2: 5′- CGTGACCCTCACGTTGAATAA -3′; shPRMT3#3: 5′-CCTTGGGAGAAAGAAGAGTA-3′. Sequences for SgRNAs for HIF1α knockout virus were as follows: 5′-CTCGAGATGCAGCCAGATCT-3′; 5′-CCATCAGCTATTTGCGTGTG-3′; 5′-TAACTCAGTTTGAACTAAC-3′. Cells were transfected with virus overexpressing or with silenced genes. Puromycin was used to select out infected cells after incubation for 48 h.
Immunohistochemistry (IHC)
Immunohistochemistry assays were conducted as described in previous studies [25]. Two independent professors assessed IHC staining, and IHC staining score was calculated using IRS system. Percentage of positively stained tumor cells was scored as follows: 1 (<10%), 2 (10–50%), 3 (50–75%), and 4 (>75%). Staining intensity was scored from 0 to 3 with 0 indicating no staining; 1 indicating weak staining (light yellow); 2 representing moderate staining (yellow-brown); 3 representing strong staining (brown). Staining score was calculated by multiplying the score of the percentage of positive tumor cells and the staining intensity and it ranged from 0 to 12.
Animal study
This study was approved by Shandong University Ethical Review Committee. Four-week-old female animals were purchased from Beijing Huafukang Bioscience Company. The mice were randomized into groups and there was five mice in every group. Pre-treated cells suspended in 100 µL of Matrigel were injected into the subcutaneous layer of nude mice. Tumor volume was determined every four days. Mice were sacrificed after one month and tumors collected and the tumor volume and weight determined.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 20.0 software. Before statistical analysis, the homogeneity of variance between groups was tested. Student’s t test was used to determine differences between two groups or ANOVA was used to determine differences among multiple groups. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Result
PRMT3 was upregulated and high-expression level was related with poor overall survival time in colorectal cancer
To explore the biological role of PRMT3 in tumorigenesis, data retrieved from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and GEO databases were analyzed. The findings showed that PRMT3 expression level in colorectal tumor tissue was significantly higher compared with that of normal colorectal tissues (Fig. 1a, b). In addition, analysis using GEPIA database indicated that PRMT3 was upregulated in various cancers (Supplementary Fig. 1a). A total of 69 pairs of colorectal tumor tissues and their adjacent normal tissues were thus obtained. IHC and RT-PCR assays were carried out to explore the expression level of PRMT3 in colorectal cancer. Results showed that PRMT3 was significantly upregulated in colorectal tumor tissues compared with the expression level in adjacent normal tissues (Fig. 1c–f). Notably, patients with high PRMT3 expression levels had worse overall survival times compared with those with lower PRMT3 expression levels (Fig. 1g). Analysis of data retrieved from human protein atlas showed that liver and pancreatic cancer patients with high PRMT3 expression levels presented with worse overall survival times compared with patients with low expression level (Supplementary Fig. 1b). Furthermore, multivariate analysis indicated that PRMT3 expression level was an independent risk factor of overall survival time of patients (Fig. 1h). These findings implied that PRMT3 plays a role as a pro-tumorigenesis factor in tumorigenesis.
PRMT3 induced cancer cell VEGFA expression
To further explore the detailed mechanism in PRMT3-mediated tumorigenesis, RNA sequencing was performed using LoVo cells expressing shnc or shPRMT3. The findings showed that angiogenesis signaling pathway was significantly activated in LoVo cells ectopic expressing shnc compared with shPRMT3 cells. In addition, analysis of GSE87211 dataset showed similar results (Fig. 2a, Supplementary Fig. 2a, and Supplementary Table 1). Analysis of several datasets indicated that PRMT3 expression level was positively correlated with VEGFA expression level (Supplementary Fig. 2b, c). Results from western blot and ELISA assays showed that PRMT3 overexpression promotes VEGFA expression of cancer cells (Fig. 2b, c). Moreover, silencing PRMT3 inhibited VEGFA expression of cancer cells (Fig. 2d, e). Results from CCK8 assays showed that HUVEC cultured in conditional medium obtained from PRMT3 cells, had higher proliferation ability compared with HUVEC cultured in negative control conditional medium (Supplementary Fig. 2d). Similar results were observed for shPRMT3 cells (Fig. 2f). Besides, PI analysis showed that medium from cells ectopic expressing PRMT3 decreased the G0-G1 phase ratio but increased S phase ratio of HUVECs compared to medium from cells ectopic expressing Vector (Supplementary Fig. 2e), which was consistent with results from cells ectopic expressing shnc and shPRMT3 (Fig. 2g and Supplementary Fig. 3a). However, cell apoptosis analysis showed that there was no difference of apoptosis ratio of HUVECs cultured with different conditional mediums (Supplementary Fig. 3b). Further, the findings from transwell assays indicated that medium from PRMT3 cells significantly increased HUVEC migration ability compared with vector cells, and medium from loss-of-PRMT3 cells significantly inhibited HUVEC migration ability compared with negative control cells (Fig. 2h and Supplementary Fig. 3c–e). Results from tube formation assays showed that medium from gain-of-PRMT3 cells significantly promoted tube formation ability of HUVEC compared with medium from negative control cells (Supplementary Fig. 3f, g). Notably, consistent results were observed with loss-of-PRMT3 cells (Fig. 2i and Supplementary Fig. 4a). Furthermore, SGC707 was used to pharmacologically inhibit PRMT3 activity of cancer cells, and similar results were obtained (Supplementary Fig. 4b–d) [26]. These findings imply that PRMT3 activates angiogenesis signaling pathway and induces VEGFA expression in cancer cells.
PRMT3 activated HIF1/VEGFA signaling pathway
Further, the detailed mechanism of PRMT3-mediated VEGFA expression was explored. Unlike other members of PRMT family, PRMT3 is mainly localized in the cytoplasm, implying that PRMT3-mediated VEGFA expression might be independent of PRMT3-mediated histone modification [27]. Previous studies report that HIF1 complex and IL-6/STAT3 signaling pathway plays a crucial role in tumor angiogenesis, and STAT3 Y705 phosphorylation modulates IL-6/STAT3 signal pathway activation [11, 32-34]. However, The findings from western blot showed that PRMT3 overexpression significantly promoted HIF1α expression in hypoxia and normoxia but had no significant effect on the expression of STAT3 or phosphorylation of STAT3 Y705 (Fig. 3a and Supplementary Figs. 5a, 6a). Moreover, we used the CRISPR-Cas9 system to knock out PRMT3 gene in lovo cells. We found that Loss of PRMT3 or pharmacological inhibition of PRMT3 activity significantly inhibited HIF1α expression under hypoxia or nomoxia conditions and had no significant effect on the expression of STAT3 or phosphorylation of STAT3 Y705 (Fig. 3b and Supplementary Figs. 5b–d, 6b). RT-PCT results indicated that PRMT3 overexpression or silencing of PRMT3 had no significant effect on mRNA expression of HIF1α under hypoxia (Fig. 3c and Supplementary Fig. 5e). These findings implied that PRMT3 regulates HIF1α expression through post-transcriptional modifications. Poly-ubiquitin modification of HIF1α modulates HIF1α stabilization and expression level [11]. Therefore, the role of PRMT3 in modulation of HIF1α poly-ubiquitination was explored. Notably, upregulation of PRMT3 significantly inhibited HIF1α poly-ubiquitination, and downregulation of PRMT3 significantly increased HIF1α poly-ubiquitination (Fig. 3d and Supplementary Fig. 5f). In addition, treatment of cells with protein synthesis inhibitor (cycloheximide) showed that PRMT3 overexpression significantly increased the half-life of endogenous HIF-1a (Fig. 3e).
HIF1α is hydroxylated by PHDs. In normoxia condition, the enzyme activity of PHDs is significantly upregulated and cells exhibit increased HIF1α hydroxylation and decreased HIF-1 stabilization [11]. Notably, PRMT3 overexpression did not decrease HIF-1α hydroxylation level in normoxia condition (Supplementary Fig. 5g). Similar results were obtained in cells expressing ectopic shnc or shPRMT3 (Supplementary Fig. 5h). Moreover, PRMT3 expression level of colorectal tumor tissues was positively correlated with HIF1α expression level of colorectal tumor tissues (Fig. 3f and Supplementary Fig. 5i). These findings indicated that PRMT3 modulates HIF1α/VEGFA signaling pathway.
PRMT3-mediated VEGFA expression depends on HIF1α
Four different kinds of LoVo and RKO cell lines expressing ectopic vector + shnc, PRMT3 + shnc, PRMT3 + shHIF1α#1, and PRMT3 + shHIF1α#2 were constructed. The finding from western blot and ELISA assays showed that increased expression of VEGFA induced by PRMT3 was reversed by silencing HIF1α expression in hypoxia and normoxia condition (Fig. 4a, b and Supplementary Fig. 6a). Three types of LoVo and RKO cell lines expressing ectopic vector + shnc, shPRMT3+vector, and shPRMT3 + HIF1α were constructed. The findings showed that a decrease in the expression level of VEGFA caused by silencing of PRMT3 was reversed by upregulation of HIF1α in hypoxia and normoxia condition (Fig. 4c, d and Supplementary Fig. 6b). Moreover, The results from CCK8 analysis, transwell assays, and tube formation assays showed that medium from cells expressing ectopic PRMT3 presenting high HUVECs pro-proliferation, pro-migration, and pro-tube formation ability was reversed by silencing HIF1α expression (Fig. 4e–h and Supplementary Fig. 6c, d). Consistently, HIF1α overexpression was abrogated by medium from cells expressing ectopic shPRMT3 with low HUVECs proliferation, migration, and tube formation ability (Supplementary Fig. 7a–e). These findings indicated that PRMT3 induced VEGFA expression by stabilizing HIF1α and activating HIF1/VEGFA signaling pathway and PRMT3-mediated VEGFA overexpression depends on HIF1α expression.
PRMT3 methylated HIF1α at arginine 282 site
Analysis showed a physical interaction between HIF1α and PRMT3 in HEK 293 T and LoVo cells under normoxia conditions (Fig. 5a and Supplementary Fig. 8a). GST-pulldown analysis showed a direct binding between HIF1α and PRMT3 (Fig. 5b). Notably, hypoxia enhanced interaction between HIF1α and PRMT3 (Supplementary Fig. 8b). Moreover, methyltransferase-deficiency PRMT3 E335Q overexpression showed no significant effect on HIF1α expression (Supplementary Fig. 8c). Further analysis was conducted to explore whether PRMT3 methylates HIF1α arginine residues. Pan-asymmetric dimethylarginine antibody (pan-Rme2a) or pan- mono-methyl arginine antibody (pan-Rme) was used to detect asymmetric dimethyl /mono-methyl arginine level of HIF1α in cells. The findings showed that PRMT3 overexpression significantly increased asymmetric dimethylarginine level of HIF1α but not mono-methyl arginine level of HIF1α (Fig. 5c and Supplementary Fig. 8d). Notably, hypoxia increased HIF1α asymmetric dimethylarginine level but not mono-methyl arginine level (Supplementary Fig. 8e). Methyltransferase-deficiency PRMT3 E335Q had no significant effect on asymmetric dimethylarginine level of HIF1α (Supplementary Fig. 8f). Furthermore, silencing of PRMT3 or pharmacological inhibition of PRMT3 activity significantly reduced the asymmetric dimethylarginine level of HIF1α (Fig. 5d and Supplementary Fig. 8g). Moreover, loss of PRMT3 abrogated the upregulated asymmetric dimethylarginine level of hypoxia-mediated HIF1α (Fig. 5e). These findings implied that PRMT3 regulates HIF1α asymmetric dimethylarginine level, and these effects depend on enzymatic activity of PRMT3.
Further analysis was conducted to explore which arginine residues of HIF1α were methylated by PRMT3. Analysis was conducted to determine where PRMT3 binds on HIF1α protein. Four plasmids separately containing 1–200aa, 201–400aa, 401–600aa, and 601-terminal of HIF1α CDS sequences were constructed. The four HA-tag separate plasmids were transfected separately into HEK293T cells. Co-IP analysis showed that 201–400 aa of HIF1α CDS sequences were bound to PRMT3 (Supplementary Fig. 8h). In addition, deletion of 201–400 aa of HIF1α CDS sequences abrogated interaction between HIF1α and PRMT3 (Supplementary Fig. 8i). These findings imply that PRTM3 methylates HIF1α at its 201–400aa CDS sequence. Further analysis was performed to explore which arginine residues were methylated by PRMT3. The HIF1α 201–400 CDS sequence comprised seven arginine residues. Seven methylation-deficient variants of HIF1α (R202K, R204K, R269K, R282K, R297K, R330K, and R335K) were constructed. Seven HA-tag methylation-deficient variants of HIF1α and vector or Flag-tag PRMT3 were co-transfected into HEK293T cells. The findings showed that HIF1α R282K methylation-deficient variant abrogated PRMT3-mediated HIF1α asymmetric dimethylarginine methylation upregulation (Fig. 5f). To further validate PRMT3-mediated arginine methylation site of HIF1α, an R282 specific asymmetric dimethylarginine antibody (R282me2a) was generated (Supplementary Fig. 8j). Analysis using R282me2a antibody showed that HIF1α R282 asymmetric di-methylation was upregulated by ectopic expression of PRMT3, but not methyltransferase-deficiency PRMT3 E335Q (Supplementary Fig. 8k–m). Consistently, downregulation of PRMT3 or pharmacological inhibition of PRMT3 activity significantly inhibited HIF1α R282 asymmetric di-methylation (Fig. 5g, h and Supplementary Fig. 8n). In summary, these results indicated that PRMT3 asymmetrically di-methylates HIF1α at arginine 282.
RMT3 regulated HIF1/VEGA signaling pathway, and tumor angiogenesis is modulated by HIF1α arginine methylation
To explore PRMT3-mediated HIF1α methylation, endogenous HIF1α expression was knocked out in LoVo cells using lentivirus (Supplementary Fig. 9a). Two LoVo cell lines stably expressing ectopic HIF1α WT or HIF1α R282K mutant were then constructed. Western blot results showed an equal protein expression level of HIF1α in the two cell lines (Supplementary Fig. 9b). PRMT3 plasmid was transfected into LoVo cells. The results indicated that PRMT3 upregulated HIF1α and VEGFA expression, and decreased HIF1α poly-ubiquitin level in cells expressing HIF1α WT, but not in cells expressing HIF1α R282K mutant. In addition, expression level of HIF1α and VEGFA in cells expressing HIF1α R282K mutant was significantly lower compared with the levels in cells expressing HIF1α WT. HIF1α R282K mutant significantly promoted poly-ubiquitin level of HIF1α compared with that of HIF1α WT (Fig. 6a, b). Consistently, knockdown of PRMT3 or pharmacological inhibition of PRMT3 activity significantly decreased HIF1α and VEGFA expression level in cells expressing HIF1α WT, but not in cells expressing HIF1α R282K mutant (Fig. 6c). ELISA analysis showed that PRMT3 overexpression promoted VEGFA expression in cells expressing ectopic HIF1α WT, but not in cells expressing HIF1α R282K (Fig. 6d and Supplementary Fig. 9c). Furthermore, HUVEC was cultured using conditional media from vector+HIF1α WT, PRMT3 + HIF1α WT, vector+ HIF1α R282K, and PRMT3 + HIF1α R282K cells. CCK8, transwell, and tube formation analysis showed that conditional mediums from HIF1α WT cells, but not HIF1α R282K cells ectopic expressing PRMT3 promoted proliferation, migration, and tube formation of HUVEC compared with that from HIF1α WT cells ectopic expressing vector(Fig. 6e, f and Supplementary Fig. 9d–f). Moreover, PI analysis showed that conditional mediums from HIF1α WT cells ectopic expressing PRMT3 decreased the G0-G1 phase ratio but increased S phase ratio of HUVECs (Fig. 6g and Supplementary Fig. 9g). The four cell lines were subcutaneously administered into the back of 4-week-old male nude mice. All mice were sacrificed after 24 days. The results revealed that HIF1α WT cells grew faster and exhibited higher volume compared with HIF1α R282K. In addition, PRMT3 overexpression significantly promoted tumor growth in cells expressing HIF1α WT, but not in cells expressing HIF1α R282K (Fig. 6h–j). Moreover, The findings from IHC assays indicated that upregulation of PRMT3 significantly increased tumor angiogenesis in tumors induced by cells expressing HIF1α WT, but not cells expressing HIF1α R282K (Fig. 6k and Supplementary Fig. 9h). These findings indicated that PRMT3-mediated HIF1α R282 methylation played an important role in PRMT3-mediated tumor angiogenesis.
Targeting HIF1α R282 methylation was a potential therapeutic strategy for HIF1α-driven colorectal cancer treatment
Based on upon findings, targeting HIF1α R282 methylation was a potential and effective treatment strategy. Therefore, three LoVo cell lines (shnc, shPRMT3#1, and shPRMT3#2) were subcutaneously injected into the back of 4-week-old male nude mice. Analysis showed that silencing of PRMT3 significantly inhibited tumor growth and tumor angiogenesis (Fig. 7a–d and Supplementary Fig. 10a). Moreover, western blot analysis showed that loss of PRMT3 significantly inhibited the expression of HIF1α and VEGFA (Fig. 7e).
Peptide drugs are potential therapeutic agents for cancer treatment [28]. A corresponding peptide with arginine asymmetrically demethylated was generated. A cell-penetrating peptide (MPG) was placed in the N terminal of the two peptides (Supplementary Fig. 10b) [28]. To explore whether MPG-non-methylation peptide inhibits HIF1α R282 methylation, cells were treated with MPG-non-methylation peptide or MPG-methylation peptide. The MPG-non-methylation peptide, depressed HIF1α R282 methylation and inhibited HIF1α and VEGFA expression in hypoxia whereas MPG-methylation peptide showed no significant effects (Supplementary Fig. 10c–e). HUVECs were cultured with medium from cells treated with MPG-non-methylation peptide or MPG-methylation peptide. CCK8 analysis showed that HUVECs cultured with medium from cells treated with MPG-non-methylation peptide had lower proliferation ability compared with HUVECs cultured with medium from cells treated with MPG-methylation peptide (Supplementary Fig. 10f). LoVo cells were subcutaneously injected into the back of 4-week-old male nude mice. Two days after injection, mice were treated with MPG loaded with methylated-peptide or non-methylated-peptide every three days. The results indicated that MPG-non-methylation peptide significantly inhibited tumor growth and tumor angiogenesis (Fig. 7f–i and Supplementary Fig. 10g). Moreover, western blot analysis showed that MPG-non-methylation peptide significantly inhibited the expression of HIF1α and VEGFA (Fig. 7j). In summary, these findings indicated that PRMT3 inhibition is a novel and potential therapeutic strategy for treatment of cancer patients.
Discussion
Tumor-associated abnormal vascular vessel development increases vascular permeability to fluids and metastatic cancer cells [29]. Pharmacological inhibition of tumor angiogenesis promotes tumor starvation, induces cell death, restrains tumor progress, improves therapeutic effect, and increases overall survival time of patients [10]. HIF1α is induced by hypoxia and its expression is significantly upregulated after anti-angiogenic therapy, resulting in drug resistance [10].
A previous clinical study reported that HIF1α was significantly upregulated in bevacizumab resistant metastatic colorectal cancer, thus it is a potential biomarker of anti-angiogenesis resistance [25]. Posttranslational regulation of HIF1α is an important step for HIF1α expression and may provide a therapeutic target for modulating anti-angiogenesis resistance. Previous studies report that HIF1α expression is regulated by its hydroxylation, acetylation, ubiquitination, phosphorylation, and lysine methylation. The findings of the current study showed a novel modification of HIF1α, arginine methylation. The finding indicated that HIF1α R282 methylation promotes HIF1α stability. Notably, HIF1 R282 methylation inhibited its poly-ubiquitination, but not its hydroxylation level. Analysis using xenograft tumor assays showed that deletion of R282 methylation inhibited tumor progression.
PRMT3 is a member of PRMT family mainly localized in the cytoplasm under physiological conditions [27]. Previous studies report that PRMT3 enhances chemoresistance by upregulating ABCG2 expression and by inducing metabolic reprogramming in pancreatic cancer. The findings of the current study showed that PRMT3 was upregulated in CRC patients, was associated with poor overall survival of patients, and was an independent risk factor for overall survival of patients (Fig. 1). Analysis showed that PRMT3 regulates HIF1/VEGFA signaling pathway and tumor angiogenesis by methylating HIF1α R282 and promoting stability of HIF1α. In addition, xenograft tumor assays showed that PRMT3-mediated tumorigenesis was dependent on HIF1α R282 methylation, and cross-talks between PRMT3-mediated tumorigenesis and HIF1 signaling pathways are implicated in tumor angiogenesis.
Several studies have been conducted on pharmaceutical amino acid polypeptides for tumor treatment [28]. In the current study, MPG-unmethylated-peptide significantly inhibited HIF1/VEGFA signaling pathway activity in vitro. Xenograft tumor assays further showed that MPG-unmethylated-peptide therapeutically inhibited tumor progression (Fig. 7f), thus indicating a novel therapeutic strategy for colorectal tumor treatment.
Conclusion
In summary, the findings of the current study show that PRMT3 was high expressed in colorectal cancer and the expression level was correlated with overall survival of patients. Further analysis showed that PRTM3 modulates HIF1/VEGFA signaling pathway by stabilizing HIF1α. In addition, PRMT3-mediated HIF1α R282 methylation played an important role in HIF1α stabilization. Analysis using xenograft tumor assays showed that HIF1α R282 methylation was important for its oncogene function (Fig. 7k). Moreover, analysis of the relationship between PRMT3 and HIF1/VEGFA signaling pathways showed that PRMT3 pro-tumorigenesis was HIF1α R282 methylation-dependent. These findings provide a novel pharmacological strategy (MPG-peptide) for inhibiting HIF1α expression, and which may be an effective therapeutic method for colorectal cancer treatment, mainly for anti-angiogenesis resistance patients.
Data availability
All data and materials used in the study are available in the manuscript.
References
Jain RK. Molecular regulation of vessel maturation. Nat Med. 2003;9:685–93.
Viallard C, Larrivee B. Tumor angiogenesis and vascular normalization: alternative therapeutic targets. Angiogenesis. 2017;20:409–26.
Bartels K, Grenz A, Eltzschig HK. Hypoxia and inflammation are two sides of the same coin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:18351–2.
Hanahan D, Folkman J. Patterns and emerging mechanisms of the angiogenic switch during tumorigenesis. Cell. 1996;86:353–64.
Tang CM, Yu J. Hypoxia-inducible factor-1 as a therapeutic target in cancer. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;28:401–5.
Jain RK. Normalizing tumor vasculature with anti-angiogenic therapy: a new paradigm for combination therapy. Nat Med. 2001;7:987–9.
Maeda H, Wu J, Sawa T, Matsumura Y, Hori K. Tumor vascular permeability and the EPR effect in macromolecular therapeutics: a review. J Control Release. 2000;65:271–84.
Dvorak HF. Vascular permeability factor/vascular endothelial growth factor: a critical cytokine in tumor angiogenesis and a potential target for diagnosis and therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:4368–80.
Masoud GN, Li W. HIF-1alpha pathway: role, regulation and intervention for cancer therapy. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2015;5:378–89.
Giaccia A, Siim BG, Johnson RS. HIF-1 as a target for drug development. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2003;2:803–11.
Tarade D, Ohh M. The HIF and other quandaries in VHL disease. Oncogene. 2018;37:139–47.
Semenza GL. Hydroxylation of HIF-1: oxygen sensing at the molecular level. Physiol (Bethesda). 2004;19:176–82.
Wang GL, Jiang BH, Rue EA, Semenza GL. Hypoxia-inducible factor 1 is a basic-helix-loop-helix-PAS heterodimer regulated by cellular O2 tension. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995;92:5510–4.
Wu H-T, Kuo Y-C, Hung J-J, Huang C-H, Chen W-Y, Chou T-Y, et al. K63-polyubiquitinated HAUSP deubiquitinates HIF-1α and dictates H3K56 acetylation promoting hypoxia-induced tumour progression. Nat Commun. 2016;7:13644.
Semenza GL. Hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF-1) pathway. Sci STKE. 2007;407:cm8.
Denko NC. Hypoxia, HIF1 and glucose__metabolism in the solid tumour. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008;8:705–13.
Cassim S, Raymond VA, Lacoste B, Lapierre P, Bilodeau M. Metabolite profiling identifies a signature of tumorigenicity in hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncotarget. 2018;9:26868–83.
Tang J, Gary JD, Clarke S, Herschman HR. PRMT 3, a type I protein arginine N-methyltransferase that differs from PRMT1 in its oligomerization, subcellular localization, substrate specificity, and regulation. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:16935–45.
Bachand F, Silver PA. PRMT3 is a ribosomal protein methyltransferase that affects the cellular levels of ribosomal subunits. EMBO J. 2004;23:2641–50.
Wang YC, Li C. Evolutionarily conserved protein arginine methyltransferases in non-mammalian animal systems. FEBS J. 2012;279:932–45.
Geng H, Liu Q, Xue C, David LL, Beer TM, Thomas GV, et al. HIF1alpha protein stability is increased by acetylation at lysine 709. J Biol Chem. 2012;287:35496–505.
Jeong J-W, Ahn M-Y, Bae M-H, Lee K-J, Bae M-K, Kim S-H, et al. Regulation and destabilization of HIF-1␣ by ARD1-mediated acetylation. Cell 2002;111:709–20.
Lim JH, Lee YM, Chun YS, Chen J, Kim JE, Park JW. Sirtuin 1 modulates cellular responses to hypoxia by deacetylating hypoxia-inducible factor 1alpha. Mol Cell. 2010;38:864–78.
Kim Y, Nam HJ, Lee J, Park DY, Kim C, Yu YS, et al. Methylation-dependent regulation of HIF-1alpha stability restricts retinal and tumour angiogenesis. Nat Commun. 2016;7:10347.
Chen C, Cai S, Wang G, Cao X, Yang X, Luo X, et al. c-Myc enhances colon cancer cell-mediated angiogenesis through the regulation of HIF-1alpha. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2013;430:505–11.
Kaniskan HU, Szewczyk MM, Yu Z, Eram MS, Yang X, Schmidt K, et al. A potent, selective and cell-active allosteric inhibitor of protein arginine methyltransferase 3 (PRMT3). Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2015;54:5166–70.
Frankel A, Clarke S. PRMT3 is a distinct member of the protein arginine N-methyltransferase family - Conferral of substrate specificity by a zinc-finger domain. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:32974–82.
Simeoni F, Morris MC, Heitz F, Divita G. Insight into the mechanism of the peptide-based gene delivery system MPG: implications for delivery of siRNA into mammalian cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003;31:2717–24.
Ramjiawan RR, Griffioen AW, Duda DG. Anti-angiogenesis for cancer revisited: is there a role for combinations with immunotherapy? Angiogenesis. 2017;20:185–204.
Acknowledgements
The study was funded by the Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 81600441).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Z.X. and W.K.X. mainly conducted the experiment, F.X.B., W.J., C.Y.L., J.C.M., and H.Q.S. conducted with cell culture, bought reagents, and conducted vivo experiments. C.C. provided comments and opinions for this study. All authors contributed to collecting clinic samples.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The current study was approved by the Ethical Review Committee of Shandong University. All patients who participated in the current study provided signed informed consent.
Ethical approval and consent to participate
The current study was approved by the Ethical Review Committee of Shandong University. All patients who participated in the current study provided signed informed consent.
Consent for publication
The authors declare no competing interests. All authors approved the final manuscript draft for publication.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Edited by Ivano Amelio
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, X., Wang, K., Feng, X. et al. PRMT3 promotes tumorigenesis by methylating and stabilizing HIF1α in colorectal cancer. Cell Death Dis 12, 1066 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-021-04352-w
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-021-04352-w
This article is cited by
-
PRMT3 methylates HIF-1α to enhance the vascular calcification induced by chronic kidney disease
Molecular Medicine (2024)
-
PRMT3 drives glioblastoma progression by enhancing HIF1A and glycolytic metabolism
Cell Death & Disease (2022)