Recent genomic analyses have shown that, despite appearing histologically normal, many tissues bear somatic mutations. Somatic clones with genomic alterations can expand in such normal tissues due not only to aging but also to exposure to exogenous stresses or stimuli1. Benign disorders such as colitis can also stem from such genomic changes2. The uterus is the only organ experiencing menstruation, gestation and birth, and so the normal endometrium (NE) is exposed to unique stresses capable of inducing somatic genomic alterations. External physical/mechanical factors such as caesarean section can induce reactions that trigger genomic alterations in NE. Notably, recurrent mutations affecting KRAS and PIK3CA have been reported in NE3,4,5,6. Increased age, high body mass index and parity may be associated with a burden of mutations in NE4,5.
Adenomyosis is a common benign gynecological disorder in women of reproductive age that reduce the quality-of-life of affected women. Endometrium-like epithelial cells that ectopically proliferate in normal myometrium (NM). Mutation of KRAS and/or PIK3CA in NE is the earliest events in the molecular pathogenesis of adenomyosis3. It has been shown that parity, spontaneous abortion and smoking could be risk factors for adenomyosis7,8. In this study, we investigated whether particular clinical characteristics of individuals are associated with the presence of KRAS, PIK3CA and PPP2R1A alterations in NE.
In a previous study, we performed mutational analyses of NE from 56 individuals3. Here, we collected additional 42 uterine tissue samples, enabling us to examine KRAS, PIK3CA and PPP2R1A alterations in NE samples from a total of 98 women (Supplementary Tables S1 and S2). After enrichment of NE and NM by macro-dissection, genomic DNA from NE and NM (control) for each individual was subjected to targeted deep sequencings to assess mutations in the genomic hotspots KRAS p.G12/G13, PIK3CA p.H1047 and PPP2R1A p.P179/R182−R183 (Table 1, Supplementary Tables S3−S9), all of which have previously been reported as undergoing mutations in NE3. Consistent with recent publications3,4,5,6, we commonly observed mutations in KRAS p.G12/G13 (58/98 = 59.18%), PIK3CA p.H1047 (19/98 = 19.39%) and PPP2R1A p. P179/R182−R183 (15/98 = 15.31%) in the NE of individuals (Table 1, Supplementary Tables S10–S12). Most of clinical characteristics were not associated with any of these genetic alterations, and PIK3CA and PPP2R1A mutations were not linked to any specific clinical features (Table 1, Supplementary Tables S10–S12). However, mutations in KRAS p.G12/G13 were frequently detected in NE of individuals with vaginal delivery, gravidity and parity (Table 1, Supplelmentary Table S10). As KRAS p.G12/G13-mutated clones are known to be significantly expanded in NE of adenomyosis patients3, our observations raise the possibility that stresses during pregnancy and parity could induce mutations in KRAS in NE, providing a putative mechanism to explain why parity is a risk factor for adenomyosis. In contrast to vaginal delivery, no association between frequency of mutations in KRAS p.G12/G13 in NE and individuals with caesarean section were observed (Table 1, Supplementary Table S10), raising a possibility uterine contraction during vaginal delivery affect on the genomic alterations. Validation of our results in a larger patient cohort is obviously required, but if our findings are confirmed, they would support our hypothesis that gravidity and parity may drive adenomyosis pathogenesis, potentially explaining the increased frequency of KRAS-mutated clones in NE of these individuals.
Our work may have significant clinical implications. Identification of KRAS-mutated clones in NE of parous women may allow clinicians to choose an alternative protocol that might prevent or mitigate adenomyosis development, perhaps maintaining a better quality-of life for these women. In addition, our genomic analyses of NE have yielded novel biological insights that could lead to the identification of new therapeutic strategies to eliminate KRAS-mutated clones in NE and prevent gravidity/parity-associated adenomyosis.
Yokoyama, A. et al. Age-related remodelling of oesophageal epithelia by mutated cancer drivers. Nature 565, 312–317 (2019).
Kakiuchi, N. et al. Frequent mutations that converge on the NFKBIZ pathway in ulcerative colitis. Nature 577, 260–265 (2020).
Inoue, S. et al. Uterine adenomyosis is an oligoclonal disorder associated with KRAS mutations. Nat. Commun. 10, 5785 (2019).
Lac, V. et al. Oncogenic mutations in histologically normal endometrium: the new normal? J. Pathol. 249, 173–181 (2019).
Moore, L. et al. The mutational landscape of normal human endometrial epithelium. Nature 580, 640–646 (2020).
Suda, K. et al. Clonal expansion and diversification of cancer-associated mutations in endometriosis and normal endometrium. Cell Rep. 24, 1777–1789 (2018).
Parazzini, F. et al. Risk factors for adenomyosis. Hum. Reprod. 12, 1275–1279 (1997).
Templeman, C. et al. Adenomyosis and endometriosis in the California Teachers Study. Fertil. Steril. 90, 415–424 (2008).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Inoue, S., Yoshida, E., Fukui, Y. et al. KRAS mutations in uterine endometrium are associated with gravidity and parity. Cell Death Dis 11, 347 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-020-2559-0