Osteosarcoma is a malignant bone sarcoma characterized by extensive genomic disruption and a propensity for metastatic spread. Osteoid production suggests a close relationship with normal osteoblasts, and the latter are the presumptive cell of origin of this disease. The HACE1 gene, localized to human chromosome 6q21, encodes the HACE1 HECT E3 ligase, a tumor suppressor in diverse tumors that acts in part by targeting the activated form of RAC1 GTPase for proteasomal degradation. Disruption or loss of 6q21 is relatively common in osteosarcomas, and Hace1−/−/Tp53+/− mice frequently develop osteosarcomas, in contrast to Tp53+/− mice, which do not. This suggests an unexplored link between HACE1 loss and osteosarcoma. Here we compared HACE1 expression in normal osteoblasts and osteosarcoma cell lines in vitro by western blotting and quantitative RT-PCR, and in human osteosarcoma specimens by immunohistochemistry. Both HACE1 transcript and protein levels were reduced in osteosarcoma compared to osteoblasts in vitro. Reduced HACE1 expression in osteosarcoma tumors was observed in 76% of cases and associated with high-grade lesions. Further, clonally derived pairs of high and low metastatic osteosarcoma cell lines showed significant downregulation in the high compared to corresponding low metastatic cells. Ectopic expression of HACE1 markedly inhibited anchorage-independent growth and cell motility of HACE1 osteosarcoma cell lines, and was associated with reduced RAC1 activation and decreased reactive oxygen species (ROS). Finally, HACE1 overexpression blocked osteosarcoma xenograft growth and dramatically reduced pulmonary metastases. These findings point to a potential tumor suppressor function for HACE1 in osteosarcoma.
Osteosarcoma is a malignant bone tumor commonly arising in areas of rapid bone growth, such as the distal femur and proximal tibia1,2,3. It represents the most common bone sarcoma, comprising approximately 20% of all bone tumors and about 5% of pediatric tumors1. It is predominantly a disease of adolescence and young adulthood, with 60% of patients aged under 25 years at diagnosis; however, there is a second peak of incidence in later life, with 30% of patients being over 40 years of age4. Several sub-types of osteosarcoma are described, which have in common the production of osteoid by malignant cells, and a propensity for metastatic spread, particularly to lungs2,5.
Most cases of osteosarcoma are sporadic, but certain environmental and hereditary factors have been associated with elevated risk osteosarcoma6,7. The former include exposure to ionizing radiation and Paget disease, with dysregulated bone recycling, both of which well-recognized risk factors for the development of secondary osteosarcoma8,9. Hereditary conditions associated with osteosarcoma include familial retinoblastoma, Li–Fraumeni syndrome, and Rothmund–Thomson syndrome10. The tumor suppressor gene TP53 is the most well-characterized gene implicated in osteosarcoma6. Loss of p53 due to somatic mutation, or germline inactivation as in the autosomal dominant disorder Li–Fraumeni syndrome, predisposes to osteosarcoma11,12,13. TP53 is commonly inactivated in osteosarcoma either by allelic loss, point mutations, or gene rearrangements12,14,15. Up to 26.5% of non-hereditary osteosarcoma cases show somatic loss of p5316, and 30% of Li–Fraumeni syndrome patients develop osteosarcoma17. TP53 mutations are associated with unfavorable outcome18, and up to 60% of high-grade osteosarcomas show TP53 mutations, compared with 1% of low-grade osteosarcoma11,19,20.
Another well-characterized gene implicated in osteosarcoma is RB1, localized to chromosome 13q14 and encoding the 110 kDa pRB1 protein that negatively regulates cell cycle progression21. Loss of RB in osteosarcoma is associated with poor patient outcome22,23. Other genetic abnormalities are also associated with increased risk of osteosarcoma, such as mutations of RecQ helicases, germline RECQL4 inactivation resulting in Rothmund–Thomson syndrome24, BLM(RECQL3) inactivation resulting in Bloom syndrome, or WRN inactivation resulting in Werner syndrome11,25. MicroRNA and copy number variation (CNV) analyses have further identified hsa-miR-27a-3p, hsa-miR-9-5p, hsa-miR-182-5p, FRS2, CORO1C, FOXP1, and CPEB4 as potentially contributing to the pathogenesis of osteosarcoma26. Moreover, next-generation sequencing of patients with conventional high-grade osteosarcoma identified 15 genes with variations only in the treatment non-responder patients, including ERBB4, Thrombospondin I (THBS1), DIS3, and BCLAF27. Whole-genome sequencing of 20 osteosarcomas and matched normal tissue showed multiple tumor-associated structural variations and copy number alterations as well as kataegis (single-nucleotide variations with localized hypermutation)28. Of note, p53 pathway mutations were identified in all tumor samples. Somatic alterations affecting RB1, ATRX, and DLG2 genes were detected in 29–53% of the tumors. Recently, exome sequencing of 31 osteosarcomas showed that over 80% exhibited mutational signatures characteristic of BRCA1/2 deficiency29, further highlighting the role of altered DNA damage repair pathways in osteosarcoma.
HACE1 (HECT domain and ankyrin-repeat-containing E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase 1) was originally cloned from chromosome 6q21 translocation breakpoints in pediatric Wilms’ tumor30. HACE1 is a HECT family E3 ligase with an N-terminal ankyrin-repeat domain (ANK) that binds substrates for ubiquitylation, and a conserved C-terminal catalytic HECT domain that is responsible for HACE1 ligase activity30,31. It was further shown that conserved Cys-876 of the HACE1 HECT domain functions to bind ubiquitin for subsequent transfer to HACE1 substrates30. Hace1 targets the activated form of the RAC1 GTPase for ubiquitylation and subsequent proteosomal degradation32,33. By targeting RAC1 at membrane-associated RAC1-dependent NADPH oxidase complexes, HACE1 reduces ROS levels in vitro and in vivo by blocking NADPH oxidase-mediated superoxide generation34. Recently, it was shown that HACE1 is phosphorylated at serine 385 by PAK1 kinase, resulting in lower efficiency of RAC1 ubiquitination35. Further, HACE1 has been shown to play critical roles in TNFR1 signaling36. HACE1 is also reported to ubiquitylate the autophagy receptor Optineurin (OPTN), which in turn facilitates OPTN interactions with p62/SQSTM1 to activate autophagy to inhibit growth and tumorigenicity of lung cancer cells37. HACE1 also provides cytoprotective regulation of proteotoxic stress responses, such as in cardiac cells38. Moreover HACE1, via interactions with Rab proteins, is targeted to Golgi membranes, regulating Golgi biogenesis, Golgi traffic, and postmitotic Golgi membrane fusion39.
HACE1 expression is reduced in many tumor types compared to corresponding normal tissues, including Wilms’ tumor30,31, breast carcinoma40, lung adenocarcinoma, angiosarcoma, and lymphoma31. Moreover, loss of heterozygosity at chromosome 6q21 is described in multiple cancers31, including ovarian carcinoma, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, pancreatic carcinoma, prostate carcinoma, and osteosarcoma31,41. Previously, we reported that Hace1−/− mice develop late onset tumors across all three germ layers, including osteosarcomas31. Moreover, crossing Hace1−/− mice into a Tp53+/− background led to an increased rate of osteosarcoma compared to Hace1−/− mice, while osteosarcomas were not observed in Hace1+/+/Tp53+/− mice31. This suggests that HACE1 loss is associated with osteosarcoma development. However, studies directly addressing the link between HACE1 and osteosarcoma are currently lacking.
HACE1 expression is reduced in osteosarcoma cells compared to normal osteoblasts
To investigate potential links between HACE1 and osteosarcoma, we first analyzed publicly available databases for HACE1 mRNA expression in osteosarcoma samples (GSE33382) compared to mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) (GSE28974). HACE1 expression was significantly lower in osteosarcoma samples compared to MSCs (Fig. 1a). Next, to evaluate CNVs affecting chromosome 6, we analyzed publicly available data on 113 fresh-frozen osteosarcoma tissue samples from pretreated osteosarcoma biopsies (E-MTAB-4815; see Materials and methods42). This identified copy number losses of the entire long arm of chromosome 6, including the HACE1 locus, in ~36% of patients, further implicating HACE1 deficiency in osteosarcomagenesis (Fig. 1b). Next we assessed HACE1 protein expression in different cell lines using HACE1 antibodies generated in our laboratory that detect full-length HACE1 or HACE1 fragments lacking either the HECT domain or ankyrin repeats, compared with a control commercially available anti-HACE1 antibody (Abcam cat# ab133637), as shown in Fig. 1c–d. HACE1 was highly expressed in previously described osteoblast cell lines (OBB and OB1 (ref. 43)) compared to SJSA and SaOS-2 osteosarcoma cell lines (Fig. 1e), while HEK-293 cell line served as a positive control and Ewing sarcoma SK-NEP-1 cells as a negative control for HACE1 expression, as previously reported30,31. Moreover, immunofluorescence showed strong staining for HACE1 in normal osteoblasts compared to MG63 osteosarcoma cells, further supporting HACE1 downregulation in osteosarcoma cells (Fig. 1f). Similar results were obtained by immunostaining of cell pellets for HACE1 expression (data not shown). Next, we assessed HACE1 transcript levels in two other osteoblast cell lines, OBB and hFOB43, and different osteosarcoma cell lines using quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), revealing significantly higher HACE1 expression in osteoblasts compared to osteosarcoma cell lines (p < 0.001) (Fig. 1g). This suggests a transcriptional basis for reduced HACE1 expression in osteosarcoma compared to normal osteoblasts. Finally, we assessed HACE1 expression in previously described clonally derived pairs of high and low metastatic osteosarcoma cell lines, namely MG63.3/MG63 and MNNG/HOS cell line pairs44. This revealed significantly reduced HACE1 expression in highly metastatic cells of both pairs compared to corresponding low metastatic cells, as assessed by western blotting (Fig. 2a) and immunofluorescence (Fig. 2b; quantified in Fig. 2c). Together, these data reveal reduced HACE1 expression in osteosarcoma, and point to a potential role for HACE1 loss in more aggressive osteosarcoma cells.
HACE1 expression inhibits the anchorage-independent growth of osteosarcoma cells
To better understand the role of HACE1 in osteosarcomagenesis, we next assessed effects of ectopic expression of hemagluttinin (HA)-tagged wildtype (wt) HACE1 (HA-HACE1) or its ligase inactive mutant, HA-C876S30 (see Fig. 3a), on anchorage-independent growth of HOS cells in soft agar, compared to MSCV vector alone. Immunoblotting confirmed successful transfection of the indicated vectors (Fig. 3a). Notably, wt HACE1 transfection led to loss of spindle-shaped morphology and acquisition of a more flattened and less refractive cell morphology (Fig. 3b), in addition to enhanced apoptosis as shown by increased cleaved caspase-3 (Fig. 3c). Transfected cells were then plated in soft agar and assessed for colony formation after 14 days of incubation (Fig. 3d). HA-HACE1 expression resulted in marked inhibition of colony formation compared to that of MSCV empty vector or E3 ligase inactive HA-HACE1-C876S-transfected cells (Fig. 3d). In addition, HOS cells transfected with wt HACE1 showed significantly reduced soft agar colony formation compared to controls (Fig. 3e; p < 0.01). Therefore, ectopic HACE1 expression reduces phenotypic transformation in osteosarcoma cells in vitro.
HACE1 expression inhibits osteosarcoma cell motility in vitro
HACE1 loss or silencing is implicated in tumor invasion and metastasis34,40,45,46, and so we wondered whether HACE1 might influence osteosarcoma cell motility. We first compared ectopic expression of wt HACE1 vs HACE1-C876S on the motility of SK-NEP-1 cells, as a model of cells lacking HACE1 expression30, using time-lapse imaging of wound healing. Ectopic HA-HACE1 significantly inhibited SK-NEP-1 cell motility compared to MSCV or HA-HACE1-C876S transfected cells (Fig. 4a, b). Similarly, HA-HACE1 also significantly reduced HOS cell average distance of migration compared to MSCV or HA-HACE1-C876S-expressing cells in wound-healing assays (Fig. 4c). Moreover, serum-starved HOS cells expressing MSCV or HA-HACE1-C876S displayed marked migration towards serum, which was significantly inhibited by HA-HACE1 expression in the same cells (Fig. 4d). In vitro invasion assays revealed significantly reduced invasive capacity of HA-HACE1 expressing HOS cells compared to controls (Fig. 4e). Finally, growth of sarcoma cells in Matrigel three-dimensional cultures showed a clear branching phenotype of MSCV and HA-HACE1-C876S expressing cells, while there was virtually no branching of HA-HACE1-expressing cells (Fig. 4f; quantified in the left panel). Indeed, HA-HACE1 transfected cells survived poorly in Matrigel and formed very small, compact round colonies. Taken together, these data show that HACE1 inhibits osteosarcoma cell motility and invasion in vitro.
HACE1 reduces oxidative stress in osteosarcoma cells and inhibits RAC1 activation
HACE1 targets NADPH oxidase-associated RAC1 for ubiquitylation and proteasomal degradation to limit cellular ROS generation32,34. To assess if HACE1 also alters RAC1 activity and ROS production in osteosarcoma cells, we first assessed total RAC1 expression in the above MNNG/HOS high/low metastatic cell line pair transfected with vector alone or HA-HACE1. As shown in Fig. 5a, there was no difference in levels of total RAC1, or total RAC (RAC1/2/3), using a pan-RAC antibody, consistent with previous results demonstrating that HACE1 targets activated RAC1, a minor fraction of total cellular RAC132. We next assessed levels of the activated form, RAC1-GTP, in the same cell line pair using G-LISA, a colorimetric-based assay. This showed significant downregulation of RAC1-GTP in HACE1- overexpressing cells, particularly in high metastatic MNNG cells (Fig. 5b). HACE1 overexpression was also associated with reduced ROS levels, as assessed by DCFDA staining (Fig. 5c), in cells treated with ROS-inducing agents, including 400 µM H2O2 or 80 µM Piperlongamine (PIP) for 1 h (Fig. 5d, e). Together, these support a model whereby HACE1 downregulation results in enhanced RAC1 activation and ROS accumulation, contributing to osteosarcoma progression.
HACE1 expression inhibits growth and metastatic dissemination of osteosarcoma cell tumor xenografts in immunocompromised mice
To confirm the above HACE1 effects in vivo, HOS osteosarcoma cells expressing MSCV vector alone, HA-HACE1, or HA-HACE1-C876S were injected into the flanks of Nu/Nu Cd-1 male 6-week-old mice (3 mice/group) (see Materials and methods). In vivo growth of osteoarcoma cell lines was monitored, confirming that each cell line readily formed detectable tumors at primary implantation sites (Fig. 6a). HA-HACE1 expressing HOS-derived tumors showed smaller primary implantation site tumor sizes compared to MSCV or HA-HACE1-C876S-derived tumors. Although not statistically significant due to high variability among mice, there was a notable reduction in tumor volumes generated with HA-HACE1 cell lines compared to the others, with a trend towards statistical significance (p = 0.05; Fig. 6b). Immunoblot analysis of tumor lysates with anti-HA antibodies confirmed equal HACE1 expression in HA-HACE1 and HA-HACE1-C876S-expressing tumors (Fig. 6c). Histological sections of implantation site tumors revealed extensive areas of necrosis in HA-HACE1 compared to MSCV or HA-HACE1-C876S-expressing tumors (Fig. 6d, upper panels), which was associated with enhanced caspase-3 activity as detected by immunohistochemisry (IHC) (Fig. 6d, lower panel and quantified in Fig. 6e), consistent with its role in enhancing apoptosis47. Next, we assessed the ability of HOS cells to metastasize to distant organs. As shown in Fig. 6f, upper panel, quantified in Fig. 6g, upper panel, mice with MSCV and HA-HACE1-C876S-expressing HOS tumors showed marked tumor replacement in spleens from 3/3 tumor-bearing mice, while we failed to detect any tumor spread to splenic tissues of mice bearing HA-HACE1-expressing tumors. We then screened lung sections morphologically for microscopic evidence of lung metastases from the same mice. While an average of four and two metastatic lung lesions were observed in MSCV and HA-HACE1-C876S tumor-bearing mice, respectively, we failed to detect any lung metastases in mice with HA-HACE1-expressing tumors, despite extensive morphologic investigation (Fig. 6f, lower panel quantified in Fig. 6g, lower panel). Therefore HA-HACE1 expression completely eliminated detectable metastases of HOS cells (Fig. 6f, g). Together, these findings provide compelling evidence that HACE1 inhibits growth as well as invasive and metastatic capacity of osteosarcoma cells in vivo.
Reduced HACE1 expression is associated with poor survival and advanced grade in osteosarcoma
Finally, we examined HACE1 expression in a publicly available osteosarcoma database linked to patient outcome (GSE21257), which revealed that lower HACE1 expression levels significantly correlates with poor overall survival (p-value = 4.2e−02) (Fig. 7a). Therefore, HACE1 may serve as a prognostic biomarker in osteosarcoma patients whereby low expression is predictive of poor overall survival. We next performed IHC to assess HACE1 expression in 25 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded osteosarcoma cases, selected for the presence of both malignant tissue and adjacent normal bone as an internal control. HACE1 immunoreactivity was estimated by counting the number of positive cells per 1000 tumor cells. Eleven cases (44%) were completely negative for HACE1 staining, while the remaining 14 cases showed variable degrees of HACE1 staining, ranging from positive staining in 5–90% of tumor cells, with a median value of 40%. We therefore performed statistical comparisons of clinicopathological data and HACE1 expression between the two groups (i.e. <40% vs ≥40% HACE1 staining positivity). Low HACE1 expression (i.e. <40% positivity) was observed in 76% of cases and was significantly correlated with high grade (p-value = 0.032) and reduced apoptotic counts (p-value = 0.01) (Table 1). Representative examples are shown in Fig. 7b, panels i–iv, in which normal bone osteoblasts demonstrated strong nucleo-cytoplasmic staining (i.e. +3; see Materials and methods), compared to weak (+1)-to-moderate (+2) cellular staining observed in Grade I–II osteosarcomas (Fig. 7b, panels v–viii). In contrast, grade III osteosarcomas either showed only very weak staining or were completely negative for HACE1 immunoreactivity (Fig. 7b, panels ix–xii). Collectively, as shown in Fig. 7c, HACE1 expression was dramatically reduced in grade III compared to grade I/II osteosarcoma, further implicating HACE1 loss in osteosarcoma progression and poor outcome.
Osteosarcoma is a genetically complex disease that most often affects children and young adults. The genomic instability observed in osteosarcoma has made efforts to better understand the underlying molecular pathology very challenging. Here we demonstrate reduced expression of the 6q21 HACE1 tumor suppressor gene in osteosarcoma. HACE1 inactivation was originally identified in Wilms’ tumor30, but is increasingly implicated in other tumor types. In addition to Wilms’ tumor, this includes breast, ovarian, and prostatic carcinomas, leukemias, sarcomas, lymphomas, and natural killer cell neoplasms30,31,40,41,46. For example, loss of HACE1 expression plays a critical role in mammary cell transformation and breast cancer progression40. In the current study, we hypothesized that HACE1 loss also contributes to osteosarcoma progression. Compared to normal osteoblasts, both HACE1 protein and transcript levels were significantly reduced in a panel of osteosarcoma cell lines, pointing to transcriptional deregulation of HACE1 in osteosarcoma. Moreover, HACE1 expression in clonally derived pairs of high/low metastatic osteosarcoma cells showed an even further reduction in high compared to low metastatic cells. Further studies are necessary to determine if HACE1 inactivation in osteosarcoma occurs through epigenetic silencing of HACE1, as we described for Wilms’ tumor30,31.
Previous studies have implicated the 6q21 region, including the HACE1 locus, in osteosarcoma41,48. Tarkannen et al.49 examined 31 high-grade osteosarcomas and found losses affecting 6q21–q22 in 32% of specimens. Fletcher et al.50 characterized chromosomal abnormalities in 17 high-grade osteosarcomas, and while they found many karyotypic abnormalities, they reported frequent non-random deletions involved 6q21 → qter. Using high-density cDNA microarrays, Squire et al.51 showed loss of 6q21 in 3/9 osteosarcoma cases. Further, Ohata et al.52 analyzed 12 osteosarcoma cases with comparative genomic hybridization, idenfying highly frequent alterations of chromosome 6q16–23.
Osteosarcoma cells engineered to express wt HACE1 showed markedly reduced soft agar colony formation and cell motility compared to those expressing ligase dead HACE1-C876S. Moreover, wt but not ligase dead HACE1 dramatically reduced branching and invasive morphology of osteosarcoma cells in Matrigel. Therefore, HACE1 tumor suppressor activity in osteosarcoma appears to require E3 ligase activity. HACE1 overexpression inhibited primary tumor growth of osteosarcoma xenografts in vivo, with significantly increased rates of necrosis and caspase-3 activation compared to tumors expressing vector alone or HACE1-C876S in vivo. Therefore, HACE1 loss may enhance tumor survival in vivo. Most dramatically, ectopic of expression of wt HACE1 but not the ligase dead mutant led to complete loss of metastatic dissemination of osteosarcoma cells to spleen or lungs. These data highlight the in vivo tumor suppressor activity of HACE1 in osteosarcoma.
Based on publicly available databases, HACE1 expression is significantly downregulated in 76% of osteosarcomas, and this is associated with poor survival. In osteosarcoma clinical specimens, HACE1 protein expression was reduced in malignant cells compared to adjacent normal osteoblasts by IHC. Moreover, we failed to detect HACE1 expression in 11 (44%) of 25 cases analyzed by IHC. In these cases, HACE1 is likely inactivated genetically or epigenetically. However, in the remaining cases, protein expression was observed in 5–90% of cells, and reduced HACE1 expression (i.e. immunostaining in <40% of cells) significantly correlated with higher tumor grade. In these cases, clonal loss of gene expression is unlikely, and other mechanisms to reduce protein expression, such as altered HACE1 mRNA translation or increased proteasomal degradation, may explain focal loss of expression. Of interest is the altered localization of the HACE1 protein when cases were grouped according to expression levels. Those cases with high expression showed diffuse staining throughout the cell, similar to that observed in normal osteoblasts, while in those cases with low expression, HACE1 protein was localized solely to the cytoplasm and excluded from the nucleus. Although more studies are necessary to elucidate the implications of this observation, one possibility is that in cases retaining low expression, HACE1 may functioning abnormally, either due to HACE1 genetic alterations or changes in other HACE1 pathway components. Therefore HACE1 downregulation was associated with high-grade osteosarcoma, further implicating HACE1 loss in osteosarcoma progression.
HACE1 mitigates ROS generation by targeting RAC1 at RAC1-dependent NADPH oxidases to inhibit superoxide production34. HACE1-deficient osteosarcoma cells had elevated levels of active RAC1, which was associated with increased ROS levels. HACE1 overexpression significantly downregulated both active RAC1 and ROS levels, pointing to a potential link between HACE1 loss and ROS regulation in osteosarcoma. For example, HACE1 loss may enhance ROS accumulation, thus contributing to genomic instability and tumor evolution in osteosarcoma. Alternatively, given that ectopic HACE1 expression only moderately reduced primary xenograft growth but dramatically inhibited dissemination to lungs, HACE1 loss may preferentially benefit tumor cell fitness for metastasis as opposed to primary tumor growth, such as by inactivating HACE1-mediated apoptosis under different stresses of the metastatic cascade.
In summary, these studies highlight HACE1 as a potential tumor suppressor in osteosarcoma. HACE1 inhibits growth, invasion, and metastasis of osteosarcoma cells in vitro and in vivo. Decreased HACE1 expression in osteosarcoma clinical samples is associated with high-grade sarcoma and poor survival. Therefore, HACE1 may serve as a useful prognostic biomarker in osteosarcoma. Future work investigating the potential roles of HACE1 in osteoblast development and sequencing of the HACE1 locus in osteosarcoma specimens will be necessary to obtain a better understanding of the functions of this important protein in osteosarcoma.
Materials and methods
Cell lines and culture conditions
The immortalized human fibroblast cell line (HF1) was kindly provided by Dr. Peter Lansdorp, University of British Columbia (UBC). The OBB osteoblast line was kindly provided by Dr. Marianne Sadar of UBC. The human osteoblast cell lines OB1 and OB3 were established in our laboratory as previously described43. Cells were grown in modified Eagle’s medium (MEM; Gibco) surpplemented with 20% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco) and 1% antibiotic–antimycotic (Invitrogen). Osteogenesis was induced using BMP2/BMP7 heterodimer (R & D Systems, catalog number 3229-BM), and osteoblastic phenotypes were confirmed using Alizarin Red staining, Von Kossa staining and RT-PCR for alkaline phosphatase, collagen type 1A1, bone-specific protein, and osteocalcin as previously described43. Osteosarcoma cell lines MNNG, HOS, MG63, and SaOS-2 were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC CRL-1547, CRL-1543, CRL-1427, and HTB-85, respectively). OST and SJSA osteosarcoma cell lines were kindly provided by Dr. Tim Triche of Childrens Hospital Los Angeles. The MG63.3 osteosarcoma cell line was kindly provided by Dr. Chand Khanna, and previously described and characterized53. Osteosarcoma cell lines were grown in MEM supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% antibiotic–antimycotic. HEK-293 and SK-NEP-1 (ATCC CRL-1573, and ATCC HTB-48, respectively) were used as controls and grown in RPMI supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% antibiotic/antimycotic.
Generation of HACE1 antibodies
Mouse anti-human HACE1 monoclonal antibody was developed using full-length HACE1 protein as antigen to immunize mice. Mouse serum was then collected and screened with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Splenocytes were isolated from the mice with the best immune response and fused with myeloid cells using polyethylene glycol. Fused cells were divided into 96-well plates and cultured with hypoxanthine–aminopterin–thymidine (HAT) medium for at least 5 days. Wells with a single clone growing were identified and the culture supernatants were screened with ELISA. Positive hybridomas were expanded to 24-well plates and then into T-flasks to establish cell lines. Antibody was purified from culture supernatant of hybridoma and confirmed by western blot analysis. Three antibodies were generated, namely 8D3, 3D8, and IES.
Protein extraction, western blot analysis, and antibodies
Protein extraction and western blotting were carried out using standard protocols54,55. β-Actin detection using a rabbit mAb (Cat# 8457 (D7A8); Cell Signaling), GRB2 (Cat# 610111; BD Transduction Laboratories), GAPDH (Cat# 2118; Cell Signaling), or Akt (Cat# 4691; Cell Signaling) were used as loading control. Hemagglutinin (HA) epitope tag monoclonal antibody (anti-HA antibody, Cat# MMS-101P-1000 (1.0 ml), Covance (Cedarlane)) recognizing an HA-epitope tagged HACE1 protein and anti-HACE1 antibody (Cat# ab133637; Abcam), that detect different HACE1 fragments, were used at 1:1000 dilution. Western blotting for total RAC1 was conducted using an anti-RAC1 antibody (Cat# 610650; BD Biosciences), and RAC1/2/3 was assessed using an anti-pan-Rac antibody (Cat# 2465; Cell Signaling). All antibodies were used at a dilution of 1:1000 unless otherwise stated.
RNA isolation and qRT-PCR
RNA isolation was performed as previously described56. Quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) was performed to assess HACE1 mRNA levels. The HACE1 primer/probe set (forward: TCTTA CAGTT TGTTA CGGGC AGTT, probe: [6FAM]CAAAC CCACCATGTG GGACC CTG[TAMRA], reverse: CAATC CACTT CCACC CATGAT) was multiplexed with the VIC-MGB labeled ACTB endogenous control primer/probe kit (Applied Biosystems). Both probe/primer sets were designed to cross exon boundaries, obviating the need for DNAase treatment of the source RNA. Reactions were performed in quadruplicate, and each experiment repeated twice. The reactions were run in an ABI 7000 sequence detection system (Applied Biosystems). The relative expression level of HACE1 was determined using the 2−ΔΔCT analysis method57.
HA-HACE1 transfection of osteosarcoma cells
Stable HACE1 re-expression in osteosarcoma cell lines was conducted using a retroviral system. HACE1 was tagged with haemagglutinin (HA) and transferred into an MSCV vector carrying resistance to hygromycin. The HECT domain cysteine residue, C876, critical for HACE1 E3 ligase activity30, was subjected to site-directed mutagenesis, converting cysteine-876 to serine (C876S) to create a non-functional control. Thus, three vectors were used, firstly a control MSCV empty vector, secondly an MSCV vector containing functional HA-HACE1 (HA-HACE1 vector), and thirdly an MSCV vector containing the putatively non-functional HA-C876S (HA-C876S vector). All vectors used in the current study were generated as previously described38.
Anchorage-independent growth assays
Anchorage-independent cell growth using soft agar colony assays was performed as previously described58. Briefly, the bottom layer was constructed using 0.4% agar in DMEM/FBS. Then, cells suspended in 0.25% agar in DMEM/FBS were plated at a concentration of 8000 cells/well and incubated at 37 °C. Single cells and colonies per high-power field were counted and results formulated as the percentage of macroscopic (>0.1 mm) colonies formed/total number of cells plated. The experiment was conducted two times in triplicate for each cell line.
Matrigel three-dimensional growth assays
Matrigel growth assays were conducted in a six-well plate as previously described59. In brief, a 500 µl layer of growth factor reduced Matrigel (BD Biosciences, cat# 354230) was applied to wells and allowed to solidify at 37 °C, generating a bottom layer. Cells were prepared and added slowly on the top of the bottom layer in a final concentration of 20,000 cells/ml. Cultures were assessed to ensure single suspensions and to exclude clump formation. Cells were then fed with 3–4 drops of assay medium containing 2% Matrigel every 3–5 days. The cultures were examined with phase contrast microscopy every 2 days and imaged for phenotypic changes. The experiment was conducted two times in triplicate for each cell line.
In vitro invasion assays
Assays for cell invasion through the basement membrane using Culturex Coated® 24-Well BME-Coated Cell Invasion platform (Cat# 3480-024-k, Cedarlane) were carried out as previously described60.
Twenty-five formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded osteosarcoma cases were identified and stained for HACE1 using 8D3 antibodies, at a dilution of 1:100. For IHC evaluation, the percentages (%) of cells positively staining for HACE1 as well as staining intensity were evaluated in at least 1000 tumor cells. For percentages of positive cells, staining patterns of tumor cells were divided into two categories: (1) positive (whether cytoplasmic, nuclear, or nucleo-cytoplasmic) and (2) negative (with no detectable staining). For staining intensity, we used a 4-point scale (0–3+) as previously described61. Tumors with <40% positive cells showed weak (+1) staining intensity or no staining at all, while tumors with ≥40% positive cells showed weak (+1)-to-moderate (+2) staining intensity. All cases were scored by PHS and AME, board-certified pathologists, in a blinded fashion.
Indirect immunofluorescence of cultured cells and immunostaining of cell pellets
For indirect immunofluorescence, cells were grown on glass slides, and then fixed with 4% formaldehyde and permeated with 0.1% Triton X-100 for 15 min. Subsequent stains and imaging for detection of HACE1 were conducted as previously described62. For immunostaining of cell pellets, cells were grown in regular media, and then collected, pelleted, and fixed overnight in 4% buffered formalin with subsequent dehydration in ethanol, and treated with xylene. Cell pellets were then embedded in paraffin and processed for immunostaining as previously described62. Image acquisition was conducted using either an Axioplan2 fluorescence microscope (Zeiss) or a Zeiss LSM 780 confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss, Thornwood, NY).
Intracellular ROS was determined using the ROS-sensitive probe CM-H2DCFDA (Cat# C6827; Invitrogen). HOS and MNNG cells, transfected with empty vector (MSCV) or full-length HACE1 (HA. HACE1), were seeded in 96-well microplates at a final concentration of 1 × 105 cells per well. Then, cells were treated with vehicle control or ROS-inducing agents, including 400 µM H2O2 or 80 µM Piperlongamine (PIP) for 1 h. Cells were then incubated with 20 μM DCFDA for 30 min, at 37 °C in the dark. Fluorescent DCFDA signals detected using a mircoplate reader (SpectraMax) at Ex/Em = 495/529 nm.
RAC1 G-LISA activation assay
The G-LISA RAC1 activation luminescence-based kit (Cat# BK126; Cytoskeleton), previously described63, was used to determine active (GTP bound) RAC1 levels in HOS and MNNG cells transfected with empty vector (MSCV) or full-length HACE1 (HA-HACE1), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. In brief, 25 μg total of protein was added to each corresponding well pre-coated with RAC-GTP-binding protein. This was incubated at 4 °C for 30 min followed by successive incubation with 50 μl of anti-RAC1 (1/50 in Antibody Dilution Buffer) for 45 min at RT. Then, secondary antibody conjugated with HRP (1/100 in Antibody Dilution Buffer) was added and incubated for 45 min. Subsequently, 50 μl of HRP detection reagent was added to each well, followed by incubation for another 20 min. The reaction was stopped by the addition of 50 μl HRP stop solution and the absorbance was recorded at 490 nm.
Mouse tumor xenograft studies
HOS osteosarcoma cell lines stably transfected with empty MSCV vector or vectors encoding HA-HACE1 or HA-C876S were grown to 80% confluence in T-75 flasks and then harvested with trypsin, washed, and suspended at 106 cells/ml. Nu/Nu Cd-1 male 6-week-old mice (3 mice/group) were anaesthetized with isoflurane and injected with 100 μl of cell suspension into each flank, at four sites per mouse. Three mice were used for each of the cell lines, with 12 injections per cell line. Tumors were measured in three orthogonal planes and volumes estimated assuming roughly spherical growth by the formula 0.5236 × length × width × height ((4/3) π) (length/2)(width/2) (height/2)), as described by Bogden64. On day 27 the mice were euthanized using a CO2 chamber and the tumors dissected and weighed. After sacrificing the animals, the primary tumors as well as different organs were collected, and fixed in formalin. Sectioning of the tissues were performed and subsequently processed into paraffin blocks. Histological slides obtained from the paraffin blocks were stained with hematoxylin & eosin; stains were obtained for microscopic evaluation using an Axioplan2 fluorescence microscope (Zeiss). Tumor dissemination to the lung was a sure sign of metastatic spread. Immunohistochemical expression of active caspase-3 was conducted using Abcam antibody, Cat# ab2302 and images were analyzed using ImageJ software.
All statistical analyses were conducted using a Student’s two-tailed T-test, unless otherwise indicated, with p-values < 0.05 being considered as being statistically significant.
Microarray data and survival data analyses
Gene expression microarray data for HACE1 expression was retrieved from the GSE28974 publicly available database for MSCs, and GSE33382 for osteosarcoma samples. Data were processed as described in Kuijjer et al.65, and median centered. For Kaplan Meyer survival curves, gene expression microarray data were obtained from GSE21257, and processed as described in Buddingh et al.66 and sequentially median centered. All samples with HACE1 expression lower than or equal to the median were labeled “Low”, and the remainder as “High”. For chromosomal aberrations we re-analyzed publicly available Cytoscan High-Density array data on 113 primary ostoeosarcomas (E-MTAB-4815; https://www.ebi.ac.uk/arrayexpress/experiments/E-MTAB-4815/)42. CEL files were processed using the rawcopy R package67, and copy number loss/gain thresholds were set as first and third quartiles of the whole-genome segment mean distribution.
Tang, N., Song, W. X., Luo, J., Haydon, R. C. & He, T. C. Osteosarcoma development and stem cell differentiation. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 466, 2114–2130 (2008).
Marina, N., Gebhardt, M., Teot, L. & Gorlick, R. Biology and therapeutic advances for pediatric osteosarcoma. Oncologist 9, 422–441 (2004).
Sandberg, A. A. & Bridge, J. A. Updates on the cytogenetics and molecular genetics of bone and soft tissue tumors: osteosarcoma and related tumors. Cancer Genet. Cytogenet. 145, 1–30 (2003).
Dorfman, H. D. & Czerniak, B. Bone cancers. Cancer 75(Suppl), 203–210 (1995).
Gorlick, R. et al. Biology of childhood osteogenic sarcoma and potential targets for therapeutic development: meeting summary. Clin. Cancer Res. 9, 5442–5453 (2003).
Durfee, R. A., Mohammed, M. & Luu, H. H. Review of osteosarcoma and current management. Rheumatol. Ther. 3, 221–243 (2016).
Geller, D. S. & Gorlick, R. Osteosarcoma: a review of diagnosis, management, and treatment strategies. Clin. Adv. Hematol. Oncol. 8, 705–718 (2010).
Garwicz, S. et al. Second malignant neoplasms after cancer in childhood and adolescence: a population-based case-control study in the 5 Nordic countries. The Nordic Society for Pediatric Hematology and Oncology. The Association of the Nordic Cancer Registries. Int. J. Cancer 88, 672–678 (2000).
Mirabello, L., Troisi, R. J. & Savage, S. A. International osteosarcoma incidence patterns in children and adolescents, middle ages and elderly persons. Int. J. Cancer 125, 229–234 (2009).
Ottaviani, G. & Jaffe, N. The etiology of osteosarcoma. Cancer Treat. Res. 152, 15–32 (2009).
Martin, J. W., Squire, J. A. & Zielenska, M. The genetics of osteosarcoma. Sarcoma 2012, 627254 (2012).
Overholtzer, M. et al. The presence of p53 mutations in human osteosarcomas correlates with high levels of genomic instability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 11547–11552 (2003).
Levine, A. J. & Oren, M. The first 30 years ofp53: growing ever more complex. Nat. Rev. Cancer 9, 749–758 (2009).
Siddiqui, R. et al. The TP53 mutational spectrum and frequency of CHEK2*1100delC in Li-Fraumeni-like kindreds. Fam. Cancer 4, 177–181 (2005).
Castresana, J. S. et al. Detection of TP53 gene mutations in human sarcomas. Eur. J. Cancer 31A, 735–738 (1995).
Lonardo, F., Ueda, T., Huvos, A. G., Healey, J. & Ladanyi, M. p53 and MDM2 alterations in osteosarcomas: correlation with clinicopathologic features and proliferative rate. Cancer 79, 1541–1547 (1997).
Bougeard, G. et al. Revisiting Li-Fraumeni syndrome from TP53 mutation carriers. J. Clin. Oncol. 33, 2345–2352 (2015).
Chen, Z., Guo, J., Zhang, K. & Guo, Y. TP53 mutations and survival in osteosarcoma patients: a meta-analysis of published data. Dis. Markers 2016, 4639575 (2016).
Gokgoz, N. et al. Comparison of p53 mutations in patients with localized osteosarcoma and metastatic osteosarcoma. Cancer 92, 2181–2189 (2001).
Tsuchiya, T. et al. Analysis of the p16INK4, p14ARF, p15, TP53, and MDM2 genes and their prognostic implications in osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma. Cancer Genet. Cytogenet. 120, 91–98 (2000).
Dimaras, H. et al. Retinoblastoma. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 1, 15021 (2015).
Scott, M. C. et al. Aberrant retinoblastoma (RB)-E2F transcriptional regulation defines molecular phenotypes of osteosarcoma. J. Biol. Chem. 290, 28070–28083 (2015).
Feugeas, O. et al. Loss of heterozygosity of the RB gene is a poor prognostic factor in patients with osteosarcoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 14, 467–472 (1996).
Wang, L. L. et al. Association between osteosarcoma and deleterious mutations in the RECQL4 gene in Rothmund-Thomson syndrome. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 95, 669–674 (2003).
Mohaghegh, P. & Hickson, I. D. DNA helicase deficiencies associated with cancer predisposition and premature ageing disorders. Hum. Mol. Genet. 10, 741–746 (2001).
Luo, T., Yi, X. & Si, W. Identification of miRNA and genes involving in osteosarcoma by comprehensive analysis of microRNA and copy number variation data. Oncol. Lett. 14, 5427–5433 (2017).
Chiappetta, C. et al. Whole-exome analysis in osteosarcoma to identify a personalized therapy. Oncotarget 8, 80416–80428 (2017).
Chen, X. et al. Recurrent somatic structural variations contribute to tumorigenesis in pediatric osteosarcoma. Cell Rep. 7, 104–112 (2014).
Kovac, M. et al. Exome sequencing of osteosarcoma reveals mutation signatures reminiscent of BRCA deficiency. Nat. Commun. 6, 8940 (2015).
Anglesio, M. S. et al. Differential expression of a novel ankyrin containing E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase, Hace1, in sporadic Wilms’ tumor versus normal kidney. Hum. Mol. Genet. 13, 2061–2074 (2004).
Zhang, L. et al. The E3 ligase HACE1 is a critical chromosome 6q21 tumor suppressor involved in multiple cancers. Nat. Med. 13, 1060–1069 (2007).
Torrino, S. et al. The E3 ubiquitin-ligase HACE1 catalyzes the ubiquitylation of active Rac1. Dev. Cell 21, 959–965 (2011).
Castillo-Lluva, S., Tan, C. T., Daugaard, M., Sorensen, P. H. & Malliri, A. The tumour suppressor HACE1 controls cell migration by regulating Rac1 degradation. Oncogene 32, 1735–1742 (2013).
Daugaard, M. et al. Hace1 controls ROS generation of vertebrate Rac1-dependent NADPH oxidase complexes. Nat. Commun. 4, 2180 (2013).
Acosta, M. I. et al. Group-I PAKs-mediated phosphorylation of HACE1 at serine 385 regulates its oligomerization state and Rac1 ubiquitination. Sci. Rep. 8, 1410 (2018).
Tortola, L. et al. The tumor suppressor Hace1 is a critical regulator of TNFR1-mediated cell fate. Cell Rep. 16, 3414 (2016).
Liu, Z. et al. Ubiquitylation of autophagy receptor Optineurin by HACE1 activates selective autophagy for tumor suppression. Cancer Cell. 26, 106–120 (2014).
Zhang, L. et al. HACE1-dependent protein degradation provides cardiac protection in response to haemodynamic stress. Nat. Commun. 5, 3430 (2014).
Tang, D. et al. The ubiquitin ligase HACE1 regulates Golgi membrane dynamics during the cell cycle. Nat. Commun. 2, 501 (2011).
Goka, E. T. & Lippman, M. E. Loss of the E3 ubiquitin ligase HACE1 results in enhanced Rac1 signaling contributing to breast cancer progression. Oncogene 34, 5395–5405 (2015).
Hoogerwerf, W. A., Hawkins, A. L., Perlman, E. J. & Griffin, C. A. Chromosome analysis of nine osteosarcomas. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 9, 88–92 (1994).
Smida, J. et al. Genome-wide analysis of somatic copy number alterations and chromosomal breakages in osteosarcoma. Int. J. Cancer 141, 816–828 (2017).
El Naggar, A. et al. Expression and stability of hypoxia inducible factor 1alpha in osteosarcoma. Pediatr. Blood Cancer 59, 1215–1222 (2012).
Ren, L. et al. Characterization of the metastatic phenotype of a panel of established osteosarcoma cells. Oncotarget 6, 29469–29481 (2015).
Gao, Z. F. et al. Tumor-suppressive role of HACE1 in hepatocellular carcinoma and its clinical significance. Oncol. Rep. 36, 3427–3435 (2016).
Kucuk, C. et al. HACE1 is a tumor suppressor gene candidate in natural killer cell neoplasms. Am. J. Pathol. 182, 49–55 (2013).
Tortola, L. et al. The tumor suppressor Hace1 is a critical regulator of TNFR1-mediated cell fate. Cell Rep. 16, 3414 (2016).
Bridge, J. A. et al. Cytogenetic findings in 73 osteosarcoma specimens and a review of the literature. Cancer Genet. Cytogenet. 95, 74–87 (1997).
Tarkkanen, M. et al. DNA sequence copy number increase at 8q: a potential new prognostic marker in high-grade osteosarcoma. Int. J. Cancer 84, 114–121 (1999).
Fletcher, J. A., Gebhardt, M. C. & Kozakewich, H. P. Cytogenetic aberrations in osteosarcomas. Nonrandom deletions, rings, and double-minute chromosomes. Cancer Genet. Cytogenet. 77, 81–88 (1994).
Squire, J. A. et al. High-resolution mapping of amplifications and deletions in pediatric osteosarcoma by use of CGH analysis of cDNA microarrays. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 38, 215–225 (2003).
Ohata, N. et al. Highly frequent allelic loss of chromosome 6q16-23 in osteosarcoma: involvement of cyclin C in osteosarcoma. Int. J. Mol. Med. 18, 1153–1158 (2006).
Khanna, C. et al. An orthotopic model of murine osteosarcoma with clonally related variants differing in pulmonary metastatic potential. Clin. Exp. Metastasis 18, 261–271 (2000).
Sorokin, A. V. et al. Proteasome-mediated cleavage of the Y-box-binding protein 1 is linked to DNA-damage stress response. EMBO J. 24, 3602–3612 (2005).
El-Naggar, A. M. et al. Translational activation of HIF1alpha by YB-1 promotes sarcoma metastasis. Cancer Cell. 27, 682–697 (2015).
Clegg, N. J. et al. MYC cooperates with AKT in prostate tumorigenesis and alters sensitivity to mTOR inhibitors. PLoS ONE 6, e17449 (2011).
Livak, K. J. & Schmittgen, T. D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods 25, 402–408 (2001).
Poczobutt, J. M., Tentler, J., Lu, X., Schedin, P. J. & Gutierrez-Hartmann, A. Benign mammary epithelial cells enhance the transformed phenotype of human breast cancer cells. BMC Cancer 10, 373 (2010).
Debnath, J., Muthuswamy, S. K. & Brugge, J. S. Morphogenesis and oncogenesis of MCF-10A mammary epithelial acini grown in three-dimensional basement membrane cultures. Methods 30, 256–268 (2003).
Liu, X. et al. MicroRNA-222 regulates cell invasion by targeting matrix metalloproteinase 1 (MMP1) and manganese superoxide dismutase 2 (SOD2) in tongue squamous cell carcinoma cell lines. Cancer Genomics Proteomics 6, 131–139 (2009).
Koo, C. L. et al. Scoring mechanisms of p16INK4a immunohistochemistry based on either independent nucleic stain or mixed cytoplasmic with nucleic expression can significantly signal to distinguish between endocervical and endometrial adenocarcinomas in a tissue microarray study. J. Transl. Med. 7, 25 (2009).
Ioannou, M. et al. Validated analysis of HIF-1alpha expression in cancer cells using a controlled and comparative immunoassay. Oncol. Rep. 24, 161–169 (2010).
Hayashida, T., Jones, J. C., Lee, C. K. & Schnaper, H. W. Loss of beta1-integrin enhances TGF-beta1-induced collagen expression in epithelial cells via increased alphavbeta3-integrin and Rac1 activity. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 30741–30751 (2010).
Bogden, A. E., Kelton, D. E., Cobb, W. R., Gulkin, T. A. & Johnson, R. K. Effect of serial passage in nude athymic mice on the growth characteristics and chemotherapy responsiveness of 13762 and R3230AC mammary tumor xenografts. Cancer Res. 38, 59–64 (1978).
Kuijjer, M. L. et al. Identification of osteosarcoma driver genes by integrative analysis of copy number and gene expression data. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 51, 696–706 (2012).
Buddingh, E. P. et al. Tumor-infiltrating macrophages are associated with metastasis suppression in high-grade osteosarcoma: a rationale for treatment with macrophage activating agents. Clin. Cancer Res. 17, 2110–2119 (2011).
Mayrhofer, M., Viklund, B. & Isaksson, A. Rawcopy: improved copy number analysis with Affymetrix arrays. Sci. Rep. 6, 36158 (2016).
The authors thank Dr. Torsten Nielsen (UBC) for providing osteosarcoma tissue paraffin blocks; Dr. Peter Lansdorp (UBC) for providing HF1 cells; Dr. Marianne Sadar (UBC) for providing OBB cells; Dr. Tim Triche (Childrens Hospital Los Angeles) for providing OST and SJSA cells; Joan Mathers (University of British Columbia) for technical support; and Dr. Mike Lizardo, Dr. Alberto Delaideli, and Xue Qi Wang for helpful discussions and support. This work was supported by funds to PHS from Terry Fox Research Institute Team Grant 1021 CIHR Foundation grant FDN-143280. AME is funded through a Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research (MSFHR) trainee award (Grant ID # 17159).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Edited by M Daugaard
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
El-Naggar, A.M., Clarkson, P.W., Negri, G.L. et al. HACE1 is a potential tumor suppressor in osteosarcoma. Cell Death Dis 10, 21 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-018-1276-4
This article is cited by
A novel tumor doubling time-related immune gene signature for prognosis prediction in hepatocellular carcinoma
Cancer Cell International (2021)
Rho-GEF Trio regulates osteosarcoma progression and osteogenic differentiation through Rac1 and RhoA
Cell Death & Disease (2021)
HACE1 blocks HIF1α accumulation under hypoxia in a RAC1 dependent manner
WTAP promotes osteosarcoma tumorigenesis by repressing HMBOX1 expression in an m6A-dependent manner
Cell Death & Disease (2020)