Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Clinical Studies

Circulating tumour DNA and its clinical utility in predicting treatment response or survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

British Journal of Cancer volume 127, pages 500–513 (2022)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Background

We investigate the current knowledge on circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) and its clinical utility in predicting outcomes in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

Methods

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched. Last search 16/12/2020. We included studies on patients with mCRC reporting the predictive or prognostic value of ctDNA. We performed separate random-effects meta-analyses to investigate if baseline ctDNA and early changes in ctDNA levels during treatment were associated with survival. The risk of bias was assessed according to the Quality in Prognosis Studies tool.

Results

Seventy-one studies were included with 6930 patients. Twenty-four studies were included in meta-analyses. High baseline ctDNA level was associated with short progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 2.2; 95% CI 1.8–2.8; n = 509) and overall survival (OS) (HR = 2.4; 95% CI 1.9–3.1; n = 1336). A small or no early decrease in ctDNA levels during treatment was associated with short PFS (HR = 3.0; 95% CI 2.2–4.2; n = 479) and OS (HR = 2.8; 95% CI 2.1–3.9; n = 583). Results on clonal evolution and lead-time were inconsistent. A majority of included studies (n = 50/71) had high risk of bias in at least one domain.

Conclusions

Plasma ctDNA is a strong prognostic biomarker in mCRC. However, true clinical utility is lacking.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Get just this article for as long as you need it

$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Schematic overview of clinical applications of liquid biopsies in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer during systemic anti-cancer treatment.
Fig. 2: PRISMA diagram and eligible studies by year of publication.
Fig. 3: Assessment of risk of bias using QUIPS (Quality in Prognosis Studies) tool.
Fig. 4: Forest plots of the association between ctDNA levels and survival.

Data availability

The full text of all included studies were retrieved from the online databases PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. The data of this systematic review and meta-analyses are all public and available from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Template data collection forms, data extracted from included studies, data used for analyses and analytic code used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2015;136:E359–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Naghavi M, Abajobir AA, Abbafati C, Abbas KM, Abd-Allah F, Abera SF, et al. Global, regional, and national age-sex specifc mortality for 264 causes of death, 1980-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet. 2017;390:1151–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mandel P, Metais P. Les acides nucléiques du plasma sanguin chez l’homme. C R Seances Soc Biol Fil. 1948;142:241–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Van Cutsem E, Cervantes A, Adam R, Sobrero A, Van Krieken JH, Aderka D, et al. ESMO consensus guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol. 2016;27:1386–422.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Yoshino T, Arnold D, Taniguchi H, Pentheroudakis G, Yamazaki K, Xu RH, et al. Pan-Asian adapted ESMO consensus guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a JSMO-ESMO initiative endorsed by CSCO, KACO, MOS, SSO and TOS. Ann Oncol. 2018;29:44–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sepulveda AR, Hamilton SR, Allegra CJ, Grody W, Cushman-Vokoun AM, Funkhouser WK, et al. Molecular biomarkers for the evaluation of colorectal cancer: Guideline from the American society for clinical pathology, college of American pathologists, association for molecular pathology, and American society of clinical oncology. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2017;141:625–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Hayden JA, Côté P, Bombardier C. Evaluation of the quality of prognosis studies in systematic reviews. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144:427–37. Mar 21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lefebure B, Charbonnier F, Di Fiore F, Tuech JJ, Le Pessot F, Michot F, et al. Prognostic value of circulating mutant DNA in unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Surg. 2010;251:275–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Spindler KLG, Pallisgaard N, Vogelius I, Jakobsen A. Quantitative cell-free DNA, KRAS, and BRAF mutations in plasma from patients with metastatic colorectal cancer during treatment with cetuximab and irinotecan. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18:1177–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Vidal J, Muinelo L, Dalmases A, Jones F, Edelstein D, Iglesias M, et al. Plasma ctDNA RAS mutation analysis for the diagnosis and treatment monitoring of metastatic colorectal cancer patients. Ann Oncol. 2017;28:1325–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Garlan F, Laurent-Puig P, Sefrioui D, Siauve N, Didelot A, Sarafan-Vasseur N, et al. Early evaluation of circulating tumor DNA as marker of therapeutic efficacy in metastatic colorectal cancer patients (PLACOL study). Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23:5416–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Yao J, Zang W, Ge Y, Weygant N, Yu P, Li L, et al. RAS/BRAF circulating tumor DNA mutations as a predictor of response to first-line chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer patients. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;2018:4248971.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Thomsen CB, Hansen TF, Andersen RF, Lindebjerg J, Jensen LH, Jakobsen A. Monitoring the effect of first line treatment in RAS/RAF mutated metastatic colorectal cancer by serial analysis of tumor specific DNA in plasma. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2018;37:55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Kim TW, Peeters M, Thomas A, Gibbs P, Hool K, Zhang J, et al. Impact of emergent circulating tumor DNA RAS mutation in panitumumab-treated chemoresistant metastatic colorectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2018;24:5602–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Khan KH, Cunningham D, Werner B, Vlachogiannis G, Spiteri I, Heide T, et al. Longitudinal liquid biopsy and mathematical modeling of clonal evolution forecast time to treatment failure in the PROSPECT-C phase II colorectal cancer clinical trial. Cancer Discov. 2018;8:1270–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Takayama Y, Suzuki K, Muto Y, Ichida K, Fukui T, Kakizawa N, et al. Monitoring circulating tumor DNA revealed dynamic changes in KRAS status in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Oncotarget. 2018;9:24398–413.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Maurel J, Alonso V, Escudero P, Fernández-Martos C, Salud A, Méndez M, et al. Clinical Impact of circulating tumor RAS and BRAF mutation dynamics in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with first-line chemotherapy plus anti–epidermal growth factor receptor therapy. JCO Precis Oncol. 2019;3:1–16.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cremolini C, Rossini D, Dell’Aquila E, Lonardi S, Conca E, Del Re M, et al. Rechallenge for patients with RAS and BRAF wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer with acquired resistance to first-line cetuximab and irinotecan: a phase 2 single-arm clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2019;5:343–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Elez E, Chianese C, Sanz-García E, Martinelli E, Noguerido A, Mancuso FM, et al. Impact of circulating tumor DNA mutant allele fraction on prognosis in RAS-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer. Mol Oncol. 2019;13:1827–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Spindler KG, Appelt AL, Pallisgaard N, Andersen RF, Jakobsen A. KRAS-mutated plasma DNA as predictor of outcome from irinotecan monotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer. 2013;109:3067–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Amatu A, Schirripa M, Tosi F, Lonardi S, Bencardino K, Bonazzina E, et al. High circulating methylated DNA is a negative predictive and prognostic marker in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with regorafenib. Front Oncol. 2019;9:622.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Jensen LH, Olesen R, Petersen LN, Boysen AK, Andersen RF, Lindebjerg J, et al. NPY Gene methylation as a universal, longitudinal plasma marker for evaluating the clinical benefit from last-line treatment with regorafenib in metastatic colorectal cancer. Cancers (Basel). 2019;11:1649.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Siravegna G, Sartore-Bianchi A, Nagy RJ, Raghav K, Odegaard JI, Lanman RB, et al. Plasma HER2 (ERBB2) copy number predicts response to HER2-targeted therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res J Am Assoc Cancer Res. 2019;25:3046–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Holm M, Andersson E, Osterlund E, Ovissi A, Soveri L-MM, Anttonen A-KK, et al. Detection of KRAS mutations in liquid biopsies from metastatic colorectal cancer patients using droplet digital PCR, Idylla, and next generation sequencing. PLoS ONE. 2020;15:e0239819.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Thomsen CB, Hansen TF, Andersen RF, Lindebjerg J, Jensen LH, Jakobsen A. Early identification of treatment benefit by methylated circulating tumor DNA in metastatic colorectal cancer. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2020;12:1758835920918472.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Max Ma X, Bendell JC, Hurwitz HI, Ju C, Lee JJ, Lovejoy A, et al. Disease monitoring using post-induction circulating tumor DNA analysis following first-line therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Clin cancer Res. 2020;26:4010–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lueong SS, Herbst A, Liffers S-T, Bielefeld N, Horn PA, Tannapfel A, et al. Serial Circulating tumor DNA mutational status in patients with KRAS-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer from the phase 3 AIO KRK0207 trial. Clin Chem. 2020;66:1510–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bouchahda M, Saffroy R, Karaboue A, Hamelin J, Innominato P, Saliba F, et al. Undetectable RAS-mutant clones in plasma: possible implication for anti-EGFR therapy and prognosis in patients with RAS-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer. JCO Precis Oncol. 2020;4:1070–1079.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Yamada T, Matsuda A, Takahashi G, Iwai T, Takeda K, Ueda K, et al. Emerging RAS, BRAF, and EGFR mutations in cell-free DNA of metastatic colorectal patients are associated with both primary and secondary resistance to first-line anti-EGFR therapy. Int J Clin Oncol. 2020;25:1523–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Yu S, Nakamura M, Ishizaki M, Kataoka M, Satake H, Kitazono M, et al. RAS Mutations in circulating tumor DNA and clinical outcomes of rechallenge treatment with anti-EGFR antibodies in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. JCO Precis Oncol. 2020;4:898–911.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Sefrioui D, Sarafan-Vasseur N, Beaussire L, Baretti M, Gangloff A, Blanchard F, et al. Clinical value of chip-based digital-PCR platform for the detection of circulating DNA in metastatic colorectal cancer. Dig Liver Dis. 2015;47:884–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Jacobs SA, Lee JJ, George TJ, Wade JL, Stella PJ, Wang D, et al. Neratinib plus Cetuximab in quadruple WT (KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA) metastatic colorectal cancer resistant to cetuximab or panitumumab: NSABP FC-7, A Phase Ib Study. Clin Cancer Res. 2020;27:1612–22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Unseld M, Belic J, Pierer K, Zhou Q, Moser T, Bauer R, et al. A higher ctDNA fraction decreases survival in regorafenib-treated metastatic colorectal cancer patients. Results from the regorafenib’s liquid biopsy translational biomarker phase II pilot study. Int J Cancer. 2020;148:1452–61.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Kang J-K, Heo S, Kim H-P, Song S-H, Yun H, Han S-W, et al. Liquid biopsy-based tumor profiling for metastatic colorectal cancer patients with ultra-deep targeted sequencing. PLoS ONE. 2020;15:e0232754.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Lyskjær I, Kronborg CS, Rasmussen MH, Sørensen BS, Demuth C, Rosenkilde M, et al. Correlation between early dynamics in circulating tumour DNA and outcome from FOLFIRI treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer. Sci Rep. 2019;9:11542.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Wong AL, Lim JS, Sinha A, Gopinathan A, Lim R, Tan CS, et al. Tumour pharmacodynamics and circulating cell free DNA in patients with refractory colorectal carcinoma treated with regorafenib. J Transl Med. 2015;13:57. 2015/04/19

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Shitara K, Yonesaka K, Denda T, Yamazaki K, Moriwaki T, Tsuda M, et al. Randomized study of FOLFIRI plus either panitumumab or bevacizumab for wild-type KRAS colorectal cancer-WJOG 6210G. Cancer Sci. 2016;107:1843–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Yamada T, Iwai T, Takahashi G, Kan H, Koizumi M, Matsuda A, et al. Utility of KRAS mutation detection using circulating cell-free DNA from patients with colorectal cancer. Cancer Sci. 2016;107:936–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. El Messaoudi S, Mouliere F, Du Manoir S, Bascoul-Mollevi C, Gillet B, Nouaille M, et al. Circulating DNA as a strong multimarker prognostic tool for metastatic colorectal cancer patient management care. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22:3067–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Herbst A, Vdovin N, Gacesa S, Ofner A, Philipp A, Nagel D, et al. Methylated free-circulating HPP1 DNA is an early response marker in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Int J Cancer. 2017;140:2134–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Toledo RA, Cubillo A, Vega E, Garralda E, Alvarez R, de la Varga LU, et al. Clinical validation of prospective liquid biopsy monitoring in patients with wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer treated with FOLFIRI-cetuximab. Oncotarget. 2017;8:35289–300.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. McShane LM, Altman DG, Sauerbrei W, Taube SE, Gion M, Clark GM. REporting recommendations for tumour MARKer prognostic studies (REMARK). Eur J Cancer. 2005;41:1690–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Khan K, Rata M, Cunningham D, Koh DM, Tunariu N, Hahne JC, et al. Functional imaging and circulating biomarkers of response to regorafenib in treatment-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer patients in a prospective phase II study. Gut. 2018;67:1484–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Boeckx N, Op de Beeck K, Beyens M, Deschoolmeester V, Hermans C, De Clercq P, et al. Mutation and methylation analysis of circulating tumor DNA can be used for follow-up of metastatic colorectal cancer patients. Clin Color Cancer. 2018;17:e369–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Hsu HC, Lapke N, Wang CW, Lin PY, You JF, Yeh CY, et al. Targeted sequencing of circulating tumor DNA to monitor genetic variants and therapeutic response in metastatic colorectal cancer. Mol Cancer Ther. 2018;17:2238–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Vandeputte C, Kehagias P, El Housni H, Ameye L, Laes JF, Desmedt C, et al. Circulating tumor DNA in early response assessment and monitoring of advanced colorectal cancer treated with a multi-kinase inhibitor. Oncotarget. 2018;9:17756–69.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Corcoran RB, Andre T, Atreya CE, Schellens JHM, Yoshino T, Bendell JC, et al. Combined BRAF, EGFR, and MEK inhibition in patients with BRAF(V600E)-mutant colorectal cancer. Cancer Discov. 2018;8:428–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Barault L, Amatu A, Siravegna G, Ponzetti A, Moran S, Cassingena A, et al. Discovery of methylated circulating DNA biomarkers for comprehensive non-invasive monitoring of treatment response in metastatic colorectal cancer. Gut. 2018;67:1995–2005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Jia N, Sun Z, Gao X, Cheng Y, Zhou Y, Shen C, et al. Serial monitoring of circulating tumor DNA in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer to predict the therapeutic response. Front Genet. 2019;10:470.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Osumi H, Shinozaki E, Yamaguchi K, Zembutsu H. Early change in circulating tumor DNA as a potential predictor of response to chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Sci Rep. 2019;9:17358.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Moser T, Waldispuehl-Geigl J, Belic J, Weber S, Zhou Q, Hasenleithner SO, et al. On-treatment measurements of circulating tumor DNA during FOLFOX therapy in patients with colorectal cancer. npj Precis Oncol. 2020;4:30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Klein-Scory S, Wahner I, Maslova M, Al-Sewaidi Y, Pohl M, Mika T, et al. Evolution of RAS mutational status in liquid biopsies during first-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. Front Oncol. 2020;10:1115.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Parikh AR, Mojtahed A, Schneider JL, Kanter K, Van Seventer EE, Fetter IJ, et al. Serial ctDNA monitoring to predict response to systemic therapy in metastatic gastrointestinal cancers. Clin Cancer Res. 2020;26:1877–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Wang C, Chevalier D, Saluja J, Sandhu J, Lau C, Fakih M. Regorafenib and nivolumab or pembrolizumab combination and circulating tumor dna response assessment in refractory microsatellite stable colorectal cancer. Oncologist. 2020;25:e1188–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Tie J, Kinde I, Wang Y, Wong HL, Roebert J, Christie M, et al. Circulating tumor DNA as an early marker of therapeutic response in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol. 2015;26:1715–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Hong DS, Morris VK, El Osta B, Sorokin AV, Janku F, Fu S, et al. Phase IB study of vemurafenib in combination with irinotecan and cetuximab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer with BRAFV600E mutation. Cancer Discov. 2016;6:1352–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Yamauchi M, Urabe Y, Ono A, Miki D, Ochi H, Chayama K. Serial profiling of circulating tumor DNA for optimization of anti-VEGF chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer patients. Int J Cancer. 2018;142:1418–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Zou D, Day R, Cocadiz JA, Parackal S, Mitchell W, Black MA, et al. Circulating tumor DNA is a sensitive marker for routine monitoring of treatment response in advanced colorectal cancer. Carcinogenesis. 2020;41:1507–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Xu JM, Wang YLYL, Liu T, Ni M, Li MS, Lin L, et al. PIK3CA mutations contribute to acquired cetuximab resistance in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23:4602–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Liu R, Zhao X, Guo W, Huang M, Qiu L, Zhang W, et al. Dynamic monitoring of HER2 amplification in circulating DNA of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab. Clin Transl Oncol. 2020;22:928–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Siena S, Sartore-Bianchi A, Garcia-Carbonero R, Karthaus M, Smith D, Tabernero J, et al. Dynamic molecular analysis and clinical correlates of tumor evolution within a phase II trial of panitumumab-based therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol. 2018;29:119–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Choi IS, Kato S, Fanta PT, Leichman L, Okamura R, Raymond VM, et al. Genomic profiling of blood-derived circulating tumor DNA from patients with colorectal cancer: Implications for response and resistance to targeted therapeutics. Mol Cancer Ther. 2019;18:1852–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Siravegna G, Mussolin B, Buscarino M, Corti G, Cassingena A, Crisafulli G, et al. Clonal evolution and resistance to EGFR blockade in the blood of colorectal cancer patients. Nat Med. 2015;21:795–801.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Zhang H, Liu R, Yan C, Liu L, Tong Z, Jiang W, et al. Advantage of next-generation sequencing in dynamic monitoring of circulating tumor DNA over droplet digital PCR in cetuximab treated colorectal cancer patients. Transl Oncol. 2019;12:426–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Thierry AR, Pastor B, Jiang ZQ, Katsiampoura AD, Parseghian C, Loree JM, et al. Circulating DNA demonstrates convergent evolution and common resistance mechanisms during treatment of colorectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23:4578–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Thomsen CB, Andersen RF, Lindebjerg J, Hansen TF, Jensen LH, Jakobsen A. Plasma dynamics of RAS/RAF mutations in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving chemotherapy and anti-EGFR treatment. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2019;18:28–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. van Helden EJ, Angus L, Menke-van der Houven van Oordt CW, Heideman DAMM, Boon E, van Es SC, et al. RAS and BRAF mutations in cell-free DNA are predictive for outcome of cetuximab monotherapy in patients with tissue-tested RAS wild-type advanced colorectal cancer. Mol Oncol. 2019;13:2361–74.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Shitara K, Yamanaka T, Denda T, Tsuji Y, Shinozaki K, Komatsu Y, et al. REVERCE: a randomized phase II study of regorafenib followed by cetuximab versus the reverse sequence for previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer patients. Ann Oncol J Eur Soc Med Oncol. 2019;30:259–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Van Emburgh BO, Arena S, Siravegna G, Lazzari L, Crisafulli G, Corti G, et al. Acquired RAS or EGFR mutations and duration of response to EGFR blockade in colorectal cancer. Nat Commun. 2016;7:13665.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Ballman KV. Biomarker: predictive or prognostic? J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:3968–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. International Organization for Standardization—ISO 20186-3:2019.—Molecular in vitro diagnostic examinations—Specifications for pre-examination processes for venous whole blood—Part 3: Isolated circulating cell free DNA from plasma [Internet]. 2022. https://www.iso.org/standard/69800.html.

  73. Johansson G, Andersson D, Filges S, Li J, Muth A, Godfrey TE, et al. Considerations and quality controls when analyzing cell-free tumor DNA. Biomol Detect Quantif. 2019;17:100078.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Demuth C, Spindler KLG, Johansen JS, Pallisgaard N, Nielsen D, Hogdall E, et al. Measuring KRAS mutations in circulating tumor DNA by droplet digital PCR and next-generation sequencing. Transl Oncol. 2018;11:1220–4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Peeters M, Price T, Boedigheimer M, Kim TW, Ruff P, Gibbs P, et al. Evaluation of emergent mutations in circulating cell-free DNA and clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with panitumumab in the ASPECCT study. Clin Cancer Res J Am Assoc Cancer Res. 2019;25:1216–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Marie Susanna Isachsen, Senior Librarian, University of Oslo for help in developing the search string. Additionally, we would like to thank Lene Kristine Juvet, Scientific Director, Norwegian Institute of Public Health and Kjell M. Tveit, Professor Emeritus, University of Oslo for valuable scientific discussions.

Funding

LC was supported by DCCC ctDNA Research Center—The Danish Research Center for Circulating Tumor DNA Guided Cancer Management, Danish Cancer Society (grant no. R257-A14700) and Danish Comprehensive Cancer Centers. KLS was supported by Health Research Foundation of Central Denmark Region (grant no. A1602). Funding has been provided by Danish Cancer Society, Health Research Foundation of Central Denmark Region. Registered PROSPERO(CRD42019125630). The remaining authors received no specific funding for this work.

Author information

Author notes

  1. These authors contributed equally: Louise B. Callesen, Julian Hamfjord.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark

    Louise B. Callesen, Anders K. Boysen & Karen-Lise G. Spindler

  2. Institute of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark

    Louise B. Callesen & Karen-Lise G. Spindler

  3. Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway

    Julian Hamfjord & Tormod K. Guren

  4. Department of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway

    Julian Hamfjord & Elin H. Kure

  5. Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway

    Julian Hamfjord

  6. Department of Pathology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark

    Niels Pallisgaard

  7. Department of Natural Sciences and Environmental Health, Faculty of Technology, Natural Sciences and Maritime Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway, Campus Bø, Bø, Norway

    Elin H. Kure

Authors
  1. Louise B. Callesen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Julian Hamfjord
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Anders K. Boysen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Niels Pallisgaard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Tormod K. Guren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Elin H. Kure
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Karen-Lise G. Spindler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Study concept and design: JH, AB, KLS, LC, data collection and collation: JH, AB, LC, statistical analysis: JH, LC, writing—original draft: JH, LC, writing—review and editing: JH, AB, NP, TKG, EHK, KLS, LC, Interpretation of the data, critical revision of the paper for important intellectual content and approval of the final paper for submission: JH, AB, NP, TKG, EHK, KLS, LC. The corresponding author proves that all listed authors meet the authorship criteria, and that no other eligible authors have been omitted.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Louise B. Callesen.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Callesen, L.B., Hamfjord, J., Boysen, A.K. et al. Circulating tumour DNA and its clinical utility in predicting treatment response or survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Cancer 127, 500–513 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-022-01816-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-022-01816-4

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links