Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Research
  • Published:

Outcome assessment of non-surgical root canal treatment by patients: what factors can influence their evaluation?

British Dental Journal volume 228, pages 762–766 (2020)Cite this article

Abstract

Aims This study aims to identify factors considered by patients in assessing their treatment outcome after receiving non-surgical root canal treatments.

Methods Participants (n = 225) were requested to complete a questionnaire that asked about the treatment outcome; whether successful, acceptable or failure. Participants were asked about factors related to the procedure, the dentist and the dental practice. Procedure-related factors included: disappearance of pain and/or swelling, gaining biting and chewing ability, absence of complications, post-operative appearance, and influence by practitioner's opinion. Dentist-related factors included: gender, age, appearance, qualifications, reputation, relationship with the patient, clinical handling skills, and social skills. Practice-related factors included: location, tidiness and organisation, equipment and furnishing, and cleanliness and hygiene. Simple cross tabulations of patients' responses and potential associated factors were performed using chi-squared (χ2) tests to analyse the data.

Results Disappearance of pain and/or swelling, gaining chewing ability, absence of complications, post-operative appearance, and tidiness and organisation of the clinic were found to be significantly associated with patients' assessment. None of the factors related to the treating dentist were significant.

Conclusions Patients may share the same perception about their treatment outcome as their dentists. Absence of symptoms, and gaining normal appearance and function are the main factors that patients consider in their evaluation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dugas N N, Lawrence H P, Teplitsky P, Friedman S. Quality of life and satisfaction outcomes of endodontic treatment. J Endod 2002; 28: 819-827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Strindberg L Z. The dependence of the results of pulp therapy on certain factors. Acta Odontol Scand 1956; 14: 1-175.

  3. Chugal N, Mallya S M, Kahler B. Criteria for Outcome Assessment of Nonsurgical Endodontic Treatment. In Chugal N, Lin L M (eds) Endodontic Prognosis. pp 211-228. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Zeithaml V A, Parasuraman A, Berry L L. Delivering Quality Service: Balancing Customer Perceptions and Expectations. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1990.

  5. Corah N, O'Shea R. Development of a patient measure of satisfaction with the dentist: The dental visit satisfaction scale. Behavioural Med 1984; 7: 367-373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chapko M, Bergner M, Green K, Beach B, Milgrom P, Skalabrin N. Development and validation of a measure of dental patient satisfaction. Med Care 1985; 23: 39-49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Andrus D, Buchheister J. Major factors affecting dental consumer satisfaction. Health Mark Q 1985; 3: 57-68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lahti S, Tuutti H, Hausen H, Kääriäinen R. Dentist and patient opinions about the ideal dentist and patient - developing a compact questionnaire. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1992; 20: 229-234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Thompson A G, Suñol R. Expectations as determinants of patient satisfaction: Concepts, theory and evidence. Int J Qual Health Care 1995; 7: 127-141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Brennan D S, Spencer A J. The role of dentist, practice and patient factors in the provision of dental services. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2005; 33: 181-195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Calnan M W. The patient's perspective. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1998; 14: 24-34.

  12. Wismeijer D, Van Waas M A, Vermeeren J I, Muldel J, Kalk W. Patient satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures: a comparison of three treatment strategies with ITI-dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1997; 26: 263-267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Frank R P, Milgrom P, Leroux B G, Hawkins N R. Treatment outcomes with mandibular removable partial dentures: a population-based study of patient satisfaction. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 80: 36-45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Awad M A, Feine J S. Measuring patient satisfaction with mandibular prostheses. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1998-26: 400-405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zlataric D K, Celebic A. Treatment outcomes with removable partial dentures: a comparison between patient and prosthodontist assessments. Int J Prosthodont 2001; 14: 423-426.

  16. Al-Omiri M K, Abu Alhaija E S. Factors affecting patient satisfaction after orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod 2006; 76: 422-431.

  17. Mollov N D, Lindauer S J, Best A M, Shroff B, Tufekci E. Patient attitudes toward retention and perceptions of treatment success. Angle Orthod 2010; 80: 656-661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hamasha A A, Hatiwsh A. Quality of life and satisfaction of patients after nonsurgical primary root canal treatment provided by undergraduate students, graduate students and endodontic specialists. Int Endod J 2013; 46: 1131-1139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hamedy R, Shakiba B, Fayazi S, Pak J G, White S N. Patient-centered endodontic outcomes: a narrative review. Iran Endod J 2013; 8: 197-204.

  20. Liu P, McGrath C, Cheung G. What are the key endodontic factors associated with oral health-related quality of life? Int Endod J 2014; 47: 238-245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Montero J, Lorenzo B, Barrios R, Albaladejo A, Canelo J A M, López-Valverde A. Patient-centered Outcomes of Root Canal Treatment: A Cohort Follow-up Study. J Endod 2015; 41: 1456-1461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. He J, White R K, White C A, Schweitzer J L Woodmansey K F. Clinical and Patient-centered Outcomes of Nonsurgical Root Canal Retreatment in First Molars Using Contemporary Techniques. J Endod 2017; 43: 231-237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ha J F, Longnecker N. Doctor-patient communication: a review. Ochsner J 2010; 10: 38-43.

  24. Newsome P, Wright G. A review of patient satisfaction: 1. Concepts of satisfaction. Br Dent J 1999; 186: 161-165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Stege P, Handelman S, Baric J, Espeland M. Satisfaction of the older patient with dental care. Gerodontics 1986; 2: 171-174.

  26. Lahti S, Hausen H, Kääriäinen R. Patients' expectations of an ideal dentist and their views concerning the dentist they visited: Do the views conform to the expectations and what determines how well they conform? Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1996; 24: 240-244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gopalakrishna P, Mummalaneni V. Influencing satisfaction for dental services. J Health Care Mark 1993; 13: 16-22.

  28. Clow K E, Fischer A K, Bryan D O. Patient expectations of dental services. Mark Health Serv 1995; 15: 23-31.

  29. Brosky M E, Keefer O A, Hodges J S, Pesu I J, Cook G. Patient perceptions of professionalism in dentistry. J Dent Educ 2003; 67: 909-915.

  30. Burke L, Croucher R. Criteria of good dental practice generated by general dental practitioners and patients. Int Dent J 1996; 46: 3-9.

  31. Newsome P, Wright G. Dental patient satisfaction: an appraisal of recent literature. Br Dent J 1999; 186: 166-170.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, P.O. Box 1982, Dammam, 31441, Saudi Arabia

    Amre Atmeh

  2. Department of Preventive Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, 22110, Jordan

    Abed Al-Hadi Hamasha

Authors
  1. Amre Atmeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Abed Al-Hadi Hamasha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

The authors deny any conflicts of interest related to this study.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amre Atmeh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Atmeh, A., Al-Hadi Hamasha, A. Outcome assessment of non-surgical root canal treatment by patients: what factors can influence their evaluation?. Br Dent J 228, 762–766 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-020-1528-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-020-1528-4

Search

Advanced search

Quick links