Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Research
  • Published:

An analysis of the aesthetic proportions of anterior maxillary teeth in a UK population

British Dental Journal volume 228, pages 449–455 (2020)Cite this article

Abstract

Introduction Many aesthetic proportions have been proposed for use in dentistry: Golden Proportion, Preston's Proportion, Recurrent Esthetic Dental (RED) Proportion and Golden Percentage. Although there have been studies to consider these proportions in other countries, there have been no studies in the UK to evaluate their prevalence and value.

Methods The maxillary anterior teeth of 509 students from University of Birmingham's School of Dentistry were photographed in a standardised manner and the aesthetic proportions statistically analysed using an unpaired one-sample t-test.

Results Golden Proportion existed in a very limited number of the sample. RED did not exist in the sample. The sample's average ratio was similar to Preston's Proportion; however, there was too wide a distribution for the proportion to be of relevant use. The vast majority of the sample conformed to modified Golden Percentage values; 22.5% for central incisors, 15% for lateral incisors and 12.5% for canines.

Conclusion Golden Proportion, Preston's Proportion and RED Proportion have limited value in aesthetic dentistry as they do not accurately or broadly represent natural, aesthetic smiles. However, slightly modified Golden Percentage values are vastly more representative and are recommended as a more relevant geometric component to smile design principles in the UK.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Theobald A H, Wong B K J, Quick A N, Thomson W M. The impact of the popular media on cosmetic dentistry. N Z Dent J 2006; 102: 58-63.

  2. Lombardi R E. The principles of visual perception and their clinical application to denture esthetics. J Prosthet Dent 1973; 29: 358-382.

  3. Levin E I. Dental esthetics and the golden proportion. J Prosthet Dent 1978; 40: 244-252.

  4. Preston J D. The Golden Proportion Revisited. J Esthet Dent 1993; 5: 247-251.

  5. Snow S R. Esthetic smile analysis of maxillary anterior tooth width: the golden percentage. J Esthet Dent 1999; 11: 177-184.

  6. Rosenstiel S F, Ward D H, Rashid R G. Dentists' preferences of anterior tooth proportion - a web-based study. J Prosthodont 2000; 9: 123-136.

  7. Del Monte S, Afrashtehfar K I, Emami E, Nader S A, Tamimi F. Lay preferences for dentogingival esthetic parameters: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2017; 118: 717-724.

  8. Hasanresioglu U, Berksun S, Arus K, Aslan I. An analysis of maxillary anterior teeth: facial and dental proportion. J Prosthet Dent 2005; 94: 530-538.

  9. Al-Marzok M I, Majeed K R A, Ibrahim I K. Evaluation of maxillary anterior teeth and their relation to the golden proportion in Malaysian population. BMC Oral Health 2013; 13: 9.

  10. Parnia F, Hafezeqoran A, Mahboub F et al. Proportions of maxillary anterior teeth relative to each other and to the golden standard in Tabriz dental faculty students. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects 2010; 4: 83-86.

  11. Mahshid M, Khoshvagti A, Varshosaz M, Vallaei N. Evaluation of golden proportion in individuals with an esthetic smile. J Esthet Dent 2004; 16: 185-192.

  12. Condon M, Bready M, Quinn F et al. Maxillary anterior tooth dimensions and proportions in an Irish young adult population. J Oral Rehabil 2011; 38: 501-508.

  13. Ali Fayyad M, Jamani K D, Agrabawi J. Geometric and mathematical proportions and their relations to maxillary anterior teeth. J Contemp Dent Pract 2006; 7: 62-70.

  14. Aziz M, Hossain M Z. Validity of mathematical proportions in maxillary anterior teeth among Bangladeshi population. APOS Trends Orthodont 2017; 7: 41.

  15. Murthy B V S, Ramani N. Evaluation of natural smile: golden proportion, RED or golden percentage. J Conserv Dent 2008; 11: 16-21.

  16. Mackenzie L M. Tooth anatomy: A Practical Guide Part 2: Drawing Anterior Teeth. Dent Update 2017; 44: 821-832.

  17. Shetty S, Pitti V, Babu S C L, Kumar S G P, Jnanadev K R. To evaluate the validity of Recurring Esthetic Dental proportion in natural dentition. J Conserv Dent 2011; 14: 314-317.

  18. Ali Fayyad M, Jamani K D, Aqrabawi J. Geometric and mathematical proportions and their relations to maxillary anterior teeth. J Contemp Dent Pract 2006; 7: 62-70.

  19. Azam S, Shahnawaz A, Qureshi B. Validity of esthetic proportions in maxillary anterior teeth. Pakistan Orthodont J 2014; 6: 7-11.

  20. Sulaiman E, Yaakub M S, Zulkifli N A, Abdullah M, Gonzalez M A. Existence of golden proportion in maxillary anterior teeth of University of Malaya dental students. Ann Dent Univ Malaya 2010; 17: 9-14.

  21. Rickets R E. The divine proportion in facial aesthetics. Clin Plast Surg 1982; 9: 401-442.

  22. Shoemaker W A. How to take the guesswork out of dental esthetics and function part III. Florida Dent J 1987; 58: 35-39.

  23. Shillingburg H T, Hobo S, Whitest L D, Jacob R, Brackett S E. Fundamentals of fixed prosthodontics. 3rd ed. pp 422-423. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Company, 1997.

  24. Ward D H. Proportional smile design using the recurring esthetic dental (RED) proportion. Dent Clin North Am 2001; 45: 143-154.

  25. Radlinsky S V. Aesthetic Deviation. Br Dent J 2009; 206: 447.

  26. de Castro M V, de Meneses Santos N C, Ricardo L H. Assessment of the "golden proportion" in agreeable smiles. Quintessence Int 2006; 37: 597-604.

  27. Frush J P, Fisher R D. The dynesthetic interpretation of the dentogenic concept. J Prosthet Dent 1958; 8: 558-581.

  28. Rufenacht C R. Fundamentals of Esthetics. 2nd ed. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Company, 1990.

  29. Ahmad I. A clinical guide to anterior dental aesthetics. London: British Dental Journal Books, 2005.

  30. Kokich Jr V O, Kayak H A, Shaper P A. Comparing the perception of dentists and lay people to altered dental esthetics. J Esthet Dent 1999; 11: 311-324.

  31. Ker A J, Chan R, Fields H W, Beck M, Rosenstiel S. Esthetics and smile characteristics from the layperson's perspective. J Am Dent Assoc 2008; 139: 1318-1327.

  32. Pinho S, Ciriaco C, Faber J, Lenza M A. Impact of dental asymmetries on the perception of smile esthetics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007; 132: 748-753.

  33. Al-Johany S S, Alqahtani A S, Alqahtani F Y, Alzahrani A H. Evaluation of different esthetic smile criteria. Int J Prosthodont 2011; 24: 64-70.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank all participants and Mr Louis Mackenzie for taking and providing all photographs, as well as his continued support throughout the research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Ark-G Dental & Cosmetic Centre, 10–12 Crayford High Street, Crayford, DA1 4HG, UK

    Rahul Kalia

Authors
  1. Rahul Kalia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rahul Kalia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kalia, R. An analysis of the aesthetic proportions of anterior maxillary teeth in a UK population. Br Dent J 228, 449–455 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-020-1329-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-020-1329-9

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links