TO THE EDITOR:
Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (AHSCT) is at present the only treatment modality in myelofibrosis (MF) that holds the promise of cure or prolongation of life [1]. Non-transplant treatment options in MF are palliative in scope and include Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) inhibitors (JAKi) [2]; FDA-approved, in this regard, are ruxolitinib (November 16, 2011), fedratinib (August 16, 2019), pacritinib (February 18, 2022), and most recently momelotinib (September 15, 2023) [3]. All four FDA-approved JAKi have proven to be variably effective in reducing spleen size and alleviating symptoms. In addition, momelotinib has distinguished itself, from ruxolitinib and fedratinib, by displaying an erythropoietic effect that has been attributed to the drug’s inhibitory activity on activin A receptor type-1 (ACVR1) [3,4,5]. Mechanistically, targeting ACVR1 interferes with SMAD signaling and regulation of transcription of genes that contributes to hepcidin expression, ineffective erythropoiesis, and terminal erythroid differentiation [6, 7].
The activity of momelotinib on all three major complications of MF, including anemia, splenomegaly, and constitutional symptoms, was first described more than 13 years ago by Pardanani et al., in the first-in-human phase-1/2 study, serially published between 2013 and 2023 [3, 8,9,10,11,12]. In a more recent account of the particular clinical trial, among 72 JAKi-naive MF patients who were anemic (hemoglobin level below the sex-adjusted reference range) at the time of treatment initiation with momelotinib, the authors reported anemia response in 44% (48% in those with baseline hemoglobin <10 g/dL) of patients and clinically vetted spleen response in 45% [11]. The unexpectedly favorable effect of momelotinib on anemia was subsequently confirmed by phase-2 [13, 14] and phase-3 [15] studies. In addition, we have recently reported long-term survival data among 183 clinical trial patients with MF, receiving one of several JAKi between 2007 and 2013, including ruxolitinib (N = 50), momelotinib (N = 79), fedratinib (N = 23), or BMS-911543 JAKi (N = 31) [10]; median post-JAKi survival was 3.7 years with 5/10-year survival rates of 41%/16% and drug discontinuation rate of 97%. In the particular report [10], survival was similar between the JAKi treatment cohorts, but drug survival was significantly longer for momelotinib vs. ruxolitinib (3-year drug discontinuation rate of 68% vs. 88%) [10, 12]; furthermore, 22 patients received AHSCT after failing JAKi therapy and enjoyed 5/10-year survival rates of 91%/45% vs. 47%/19% in the absence of AHSCT. In the current study, we focused on the 79 momelotinib-treated patients included in the aforementioned study, in order to identify molecular predictors of drug survival (i.e., drug retention) and longevity without AHSCT (transplant-censored survival).
This study was conducted under an institutional review board-approved minimum risk protocol that allowed retrospective collection and analysis of data from Mayo Clinic patients who participated in the above-referenced phase-1/2 core study of momelotinib (NCT00935987). Study design, drug doses and schedule, and additional details on treatment effect and side effects have previously been published [9]. The current study is restricted to analysis of patients who were JAKi-naive prior to their treatment with momelotinib and is focused on drug survival (i.e., drug retention) and transplant-censored survival; the former was calculated from time of initiation of momelotinib to time of treatment discontinuation while the latter required censoring of patients at the time of AHSCT. Mutation information used in the current study, other than those involving MPN-specific driver mutations (i.e., JAK2, CALR, MPL), was restricted to those performed under a research protocol and did not include additional routine NGS-derived data, as was the case in some of our prior studies [10,11,12]. Anemia and spleen response criteria for the current study were according to the revised international working group for MPN research and treatment (IWG-MRT) criteria, with some modifications [16]; MRI/CT confirmation of clinically vetted spleen response was not required. Age cutoff levels used for survival analysis were determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Conventional statistical methods were applied using JMP Pro 16.0.0 software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).
A total of 79 JAKi-naive patients with MF were considered: median age 67 years; males 54%; MF variant PMF 65%, post-PV MF 20%, post-ET MF 15%; driver mutation distribution JAK2 71%, type-1/like CALR (CALR-1) 14%, type 2/like CALR (CALR-2) 3%, MPL 8%, triple-negative 5% (Table 1). Risk category according to the dynamic international prognostic scoring system (DIPSS) [17] was high/intermediate in 80% of the patients and unfavorable karyotype was documented in 29%. Information on other mutations performed under the research protocol was available in 45 cases and included ASXL1 22%, SRSF2 18%, and either ASXL1 or SRSF2 in 38% (Table 1). The median time from the initial diagnosis to the time of study entry was 25.2 months, and patients were enrolled between November 2009 and March 2011 with follow-up information updated through July 2023; during this period, 68 (86%) deaths, 13 (16%) leukemic transformations, and 7 (9%) AHSCTs were recorded; median follow-up for alive patients was 12.5 years (range 11.3–13.1; Table 1). As previously noted in our previously published report [11], the anemia response rate in patients with baseline hemoglobin level of <10 g/dL was 48%, and the spleen response rate 47%. The median duration of treatment with momelotinib was 25 months (range 0.1–157); the proportion of patients remaining on momelotinib treatment was 68% at 1 year, 30% at 3 years, 16% at 5 years, and 7% at 10 years (Fig. 1a). At the time of this writing, 5 (6.3%) of the original 79 patients were still receiving momelotinib therapy with treatment durations between 152+ to 157+ months; these 5 patients make up 45% of the 11 patients currently alive; among the remaining 6 alive patients, 5 had received AHSCT.
In univariate analysis, molecular predictors of drug survival included CALR-1 (P = 0.006) but not ASXL1 (P = 0.6), SRSF2 (P = 0.3) or any other myeloid neoplasm-related gene mutation evaluated; unfavorable karyotype was of borderline significance (P = 0.08). Of note, among the 11 CALR-1 mutated patients, 8 had PMF and 3 post-ET MF; the impact of CALR-1 mutation on overall and drug survival was not differentially affected in PMF vs. post-ET MF, with the caveat that the number of informative cases in the latter instance was too small to be definitive (data not shown). The 3-, 5-, and 10-year drug survival rates in CALR-1-mutated patients were 64%, 40%, and 18%, respectively, vs. 25%, 11%, and 4%, in CALR-1 wild-type (P = 0.01, Fig. 1b). In multivariable analysis, CALR-1 (HR 0.4, 95% CI 0.2–0.87), age <63 years (HR 0.5, 95% CI 0.3–0.89), and absence of baseline transfusion dependency (HR 0.6, 95% CI 0.3–0.9) were associated with superior drug survival. In addition, spleen response (P < 0.01), but not anemia response (P = 0.23), was associated with longer drug survival; in multivariable analysis CALR-1, age, and spleen response retained their significance. These observations were also apparent when comparing patients on treatment for ≥5 vs. <5 years (Table 1).
Multivariable analysis of genetic variables for transplant-censored survival identified absence of CALR-1 (HR 3.5, 95% CI 1.2–10.5; P = 0.03) and presence of high-molecular-risk (HMR; ASXL1/SRSF2) mutations (HR 2.3, 95% CI 1.1–4.6; P = 02), but not unfavorable karyotype (P = 0.3) to be predictive of transplant-censored inferior survival. Among 11 patients with CALR-1 mutation, median transplant-censored survival was 125 months with 10-year survival rate of 60% (Fig. 1c); by contrast, the corresponding figures were 37 months and 12%, in the 68 patients not harboring CALR-1 mutation (Fig. 1c). Combination of CALR-1 and HMR mutational states enabled further risk stratification but the numbers of informative cases in each genetic subgroup were too small to warrant graphic depictions. Regardless, in multivariable analysis, absence of CALR-1 (HR 2.9, 95% CI 1.02–8.1), age ≥63 years (HR 3.0, 95% CI 1.5–6.0), and absence of spleen response (HR 2.6, 95% CI 1.5–4.5) were identified as being most significant in predicting inferior transplant-censored survival.
Survival in MF is currently determined by the presence or absence of several genetic and clinical risk factors that are assembled into contemporary risk models, including the mutation- and karyotype-enhanced international prognostic system, version 2.0 (MIPSSv2) [18]. MIPSSv2 risk factors include very high risk (VHR)/unfavorable karyotype, HMR mutations, absence of CALR-1 mutation, constitutional symptoms, anemia, and circulating blasts ≥2%; based on these factors, 10-year survival estimates range from 0 to 10% for very high/high to 50-86% for low/very low-risk disease [18]. Accordingly, it was not surprising that the current study found CALR-1 mutation to be the most important risk factor for both drug survival and longevity without AHSCT, in momelotinib-treated patients with MF. Such information might help select MF patients who might benefit from treatment with momelotinib and in whom AHSCT might be deferred. On the other hand, median survival in the absence of CALR-1 mutation and presence of HMR mutation (N = 19) was only 19 months with no patient surviving beyond 7 years and thus warranting upfront consideration of AHSCT in such patients. In the absence of both CALR-1 and HMR mutations, median survival was 33 months, and timing of AHSCT is best determined by the presence or absence of other risk factors, as outlined above [18]. The findings in the current study should not distract from the fact that the therapeutic value of momelotinib, as is the case with other JAKi, is limited to the palliation of symptoms and that our MF patients remain in dire need of disease-modifying drugs.
References
McLornan D, Eikema DJ, Czerw T, Kroger N, Koster L, Reinhardt HC, et al. Trends in allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation for myelofibrosis in Europe between 1995 and 2018: a CMWP of EBMT retrospective analysis. Bone Marrow Transpl. 2021;56:2160–72. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41409-021-01305-x.
Tefferi A. Primary myelofibrosis: 2023 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and management. Am J Hematol. 2023;98:801–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.26857.
Tefferi A, Pardanani A, Gangat N. Momelotinib (JAK1/JAK2/ACVR1 inhibitor): mechanism of action, clinical trial reports, and therapeutic prospects beyond myelofibrosis. Haematologica. 2023; https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2022.282612
Pardanani A, Lasho T, Smith G, Burns CJ, Fantino E, Tefferi A. CYT387, a selective JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor: in vitro assessment of kinase selectivity and preclinical studies using cell lines and primary cells from polycythemia vera patients. Leukemia. 2009;23:1441–5. https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2009.50.
Tyner JW, Bumm TG, Deininger J, Wood L, Aichberger KJ, Loriaux MM, et al. CYT387, a novel JAK2 inhibitor, induces hematologic responses and normalizes inflammatory cytokines in murine myeloproliferative neoplasms. Blood. 2010;115:5232–40. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2009-05-223727.
Valer JA, Sanchez-de-Diego C, Pimenta-Lopes C, Rosa JL, Ventura F. ACVR1 function in health and disease. Cells 2019;8; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells8111366
Asshoff M, Petzer V, Warr MR, Haschka D, Tymoszuk P, Demetz E, et al. Momelotinib inhibits ACVR1/ALK2, decreases hepcidin production, and ameliorates anemia of chronic disease in rodents. Blood. 2017;129:1823–30. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2016-09-740092.
Pardanani A, Laborde RR, Lasho TL, Finke C, Begna K, Al-Kali A, et al. Safety and efficacy of CYT387, a JAK1 and JAK2 inhibitor, in myelofibrosis. Leukemia. 2013;27:1322–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2013.71.
Pardanani A, Gotlib J, Roberts AW, Wadleigh M, Sirhan S, Kawashima J, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of momelotinib, a JAK1 and JAK2 inhibitor, for the treatment of myelofibrosis. Leukemia. 2018;32:1035–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2017.330.
Gangat N, Begna KH, Al-Kali A, Hogan W, Litzow M, Pardanani A, et al. Determinants of survival and retrospective comparisons of 183 clinical trial patients with myelofibrosis treated with momelotinib, ruxolitinib, fedratinib or BMS- 911543 JAK2 inhibitor. Blood Cancer J. 2023;13:3. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-022-00780-9.
Gangat N, Begna KH, Al-Kali A, Hogan W, Litzow M, Pardanani A, et al. Predictors of anemia response to momelotinib therapy in myelofibrosis and impact on survival. Am J Hematol. 2023;98:282–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.26778.
Tefferi A, Pardanani A, Begna KH, Al-Kali A, Hogan WJ, Litzow MR, et al. Momelotinib for myelofibrosis: 12-year survival data and retrospective comparison to ruxolitinib. Am J Hematol. 2022;97:E433–E435. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.26714.
Oh ST, Talpaz M, Gerds AT, Gupta V, Verstovsek S, Mesa R, et al. ACVR1/JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor momelotinib reverses transfusion dependency and suppresses hepcidin in myelofibrosis phase 2 trial. Blood Adv. 2020;4:4282–91. https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2020002662.
Gupta V, Mesa RA, Deininger MW, Rivera CE, Sirhan S, Brachmann CB, et al. A phase 1/2, open-label study evaluating twice-daily administration of momelotinib in myelofibrosis. Haematologica. 2017;102:94–102. https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2016.148924.
Mesa RA, Kiladjian JJ, Catalano JV, Devos T, Egyed M, Hellmann A, et al. SIMPLIFY-1: a phase III randomized trial of momelotinib versus ruxolitinib in Janus kinase inhibitor-naive patients with myelofibrosis. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35:3844–50. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2017.73.4418.
Tefferi A, Cervantes F, Mesa R, Passamonti F, Verstovsek S, Vannucchi AM, et al. Revised response criteria for myelofibrosis: International Working Group-Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment (IWG-MRT) and European LeukemiaNet (ELN) consensus report. Blood. 2013;122:1395–8. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2013-03-488098.
Passamonti F, Cervantes F, Vannucchi AM, Morra E, Rumi E, Pereira A, et al. A dynamic prognostic model to predict survival in primary myelofibrosis: a study by the IWG-MRT (International Working Group for Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment). Blood. 2010;115:1703–8. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2009-09-245837.
Tefferi A, Guglielmelli P, Lasho TL, Gangat N, Ketterling RP, Pardanani A, et al. MIPSS70+ version 2.0: mutation and karyotype-enhanced international prognostic scoring system for primary myelofibrosis. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:1769–70. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2018.78.9867
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
AT wrote the paper. AT, AP, and NG were involved with the concept, execution of the clinical trial, and data analysis. AT, AP, KHB, AAK, WJH, MRL, and NG participated in patient care. KKR provided pathology and RPK cytogenetic expertise.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Tefferi, A., Pardanani, A., Begna, K.H. et al. Calr type 1/like mutation in myelofibrosis is the most prominent predictor of momelotinib drug survival and longevity without transplant. Blood Cancer J. 14, 51 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-024-01028-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-024-01028-4