Abstract
Objectives
The present systematic review aimed to investigate how oral health related quality of life (OHQOL) associates with anxiety and depression. The study protocol was registered prospectively in the PROSPERO database (CRD42023389372).
Materials and methods
Studies investigating associations between OHQOL and depression and/or anxiety were included. Fisher’s Z scores were used to summarize associations between OHQOL and depression/anxiety. Funnel plots and Begg’s Tests were used to assess publication bias. Meta-regression was conducted to examine potential moderator effects in the associations. Academic databases including the ISI Web of Knowledge, Scopus, ProQuest and PubMed were systematically searched. The quality of included studies was checked with the Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS).
Results
All 15 included studies were cross-sectional (14,419 participants from nine countries; mean age=43.74 years). The pooled estimates showed weak associations between OHQOL and depression (Fisher’s z-score of 0.26 [95% CI = 0.17, 0.35; I2 = 96.2%; τ2 = 0.03]) and anxiety (Fisher’s z-score of 0.22 [95% CI = 0.001, 0.43; I2 = 97.9%; τ2 = 0.06]). No severe problems in methodology quality, publication biases, or moderator effects were observed.
Conclusion
Both depression and anxiety were weakly associated with individuals’ OHQOL. Although the synthesized associations were not strong, they were significant, indicating that depression and anxiety are potential factors influencing individuals’ OHQOL.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
As oral diseases represent health and economic burdens, promoting oral health (including oral health related quality of life (OHQOL)) is important [1, 2]. OHQOL may be impacted by oral conditions, diseases, and/or disorders [3]. Furthermore, OHQOL may impact general well-being [4]. Indeed, poor OHQOL has been with chronic health concerns, including but not limited to diabetes and cardiovascular diseases [5, 6].
Psychological health is important. However, current challenges to mental health are considerable. Prevalence estimates of anxiety and depression are considerable, especially after the COVID-19 pandemic, with depression prevalence estimated at 30.5% and anxiety at 25.0% [7]. OHQOL has been linked to depression and anxiety. Regarding potential etiologies, the individuals may not maintain good oral hygiene (e.g., tooth brushing) when depressed or anxious [8,9,10,11,12]. Depression may generate amotivation and interfere with performance of daily activities [13], including self-care behaviors and personal hygiene. Anxiety may generate worry that may disrupt daily routines [14, 15], leading to skipping of oral hygiene behaviors and resulting in poor or impaired oral health related quality of life. Alternatively, poor OHQOL may promote depression or anxiety [4, 16,17,18].
Although poor OHQOL may associate with depression and anxiety, empirical data are relatively limited and largely scattered, suggesting the need for integration of existing data. In this regard, how OHQOL relates to depression and anxiety may be synthesized using qualitative (i.e., a systematic review) and quantitative (i.e., meta-analysis) approaches. The synthesized qualitative and quantitative evidence could assist healthcare providers in designing appropriate programs to improve oral health related quality of life. Thus, we conducted a meta-analysis with a systematic review to provide insight into the presence and magnitudes of associations between OHQOL and depression and anxiety.
Study aim
The present systematic review primarily aimed to investigate how OHQOL relates to anxiety and depression. Secondary objectives were to identify possible heterogeneity sources, moderators, and biases in publication.
Materials and methods
Design and registration
Following the present practice on systematic review with meta-analysis, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were employed. Accordingly, the organization of the present findings followed the requirements proposed in the PRISMA guidelines [19]. Prospective registration of the study protocol was made in the PROSPERO (Decree code: CRD42023389372) [20].
Criteria for eligible studies
The Population, Exposure, Comparison, Outcome, and Study design (PECO-S) components were used to identify potential articles for inclusion [21]. Specifically, eligibility criteria for included studies were:
-
Populations included individuals at any age or of any gender/sex group;
-
Exposure was depression and anxiety (assessed using valid and reliable measures);
-
Comparison was not defined in the current study;
-
Outcomes were the associations between OHQOL and depression and anxiety;
-
Study design was defined as observational research using cross-sectional, cohort or case-control designs, published in English.
Information sources
Information sources for the literature search included the ISI Web of Knowledge, Scopus, ProQuest and PubMed. The aforementioned databases were systematically searched from inception to April 2023. Additionally, manual searches of reference lists of the included studies were done to explore the gray literature.
Search strategy
Based on PECO-S components [21], main search terms regarding the two main components of exposure (depression and anxiety) and outcome (oral-health-related quality of life) were selected. The sample search syntax for PubMed database was (((“quality of life”[tiab] OR “Life Quality”[tiab] OR “Health Related Quality Of Life”[tiab] OR HRQOL[tiab]) AND oral[tiab] AND health[tiab]) OR “oral health related quality of life”[tiab] OR “Oral Health Impact Profile”[tiab] OR “OHIP”[tiab] OR OHRQoL[tiab]) AND (Depression* OR (Depressive AND Symptom*) OR (Emotional AND Depression) OR Anxiet*). The search syntax was adopted for other databases based on their search features.
Selection process
The selection process was conducted in two steps. First, titles and abstracts were checked and full texts of potentially relevant manuscripts were assessed based on the eligibility criteria. This process was conducted by two independent reviewers. In the event of disagreements during the selection process, the two reviewers convened to reach an agreed-upon decision.
Data collection process and items
After selecting eligible papers, data collection was done by two reviewers independently using a pre-designed Excel spreadsheet. Data items included names of the first authors, publication dates, study designs, countries for data collection, numbers of participants, ranges and means of age, measures on assessment for OHQOL and depression/anxiety, countries’ income levels and development status according to world bank reports, and numerical results regarding associations between OHQOL and depression/anxiety. Of note, OHQOL was assessed using measures for which higher scores indicated worse oral-health-related quality of life. Any disagreements through the data collection process were resolved through discussion between the independent reviewers.
Study risk of bias assessment
Methodological risk of bias in selection, comparability, and outcome assessment for included studies were examined using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS) for cross-sectional studies. Seven items rated the methodological quality. The maximum possible NOS score is nine. When overall scores are above five, studies are considered as having low risk of bias [22].
Effect measure
Pearson’s correlation coefficients (and later converted to standardized Fisher’s Z scores showing effect sizes; please see 2.9 Synthesis methods for details) were used as effect measures to present magnitudes of relationships between OHQOL and depression and anxiety. All forms of numerical findings (odds ratio, standardized mean differences) collected from included studies were transformed to Pearson’s correlation coefficients using approaches described on the psychometrica website (accessible at: https://www.psychometrica.de/effect_size.html).
Synthesis methods
The quantitative synthesis in the meta-analysis was performed using the STATA software version 14. All analyses were performed, and the variance from within- and between-study was handled using the random effects models to resolve the issues of different populations derived from the included studies. Standardized Fishers’ z scores were computed to address potential instability of variance for Pearson’s r-correlation coefficients. Specifically, the following formula was used for the conversion: z = 0.5 × ln[(1+r)/(1-r)]) [23, 24] with SEz (i.e., standard error of z) =1/√ (n-3) [25]. The interpretation of the Fisher’s z is weak at 0.1; weak to moderate at 0.1 to 0.3; moderate at 0.3; moderate to strong at 0.3 to 0.5; and strong at 0.5 or above. Same as the Pearson correlation coefficient, negative values indicate inverse associations between examined variables. I2 index was used to check severity of heterogeneity [26].
Reporting bias assessment
Publication bias was examined using Begg’s Tests and Funnel plots [27]. Publication bias was not assessed for the subgroup of studies investigating relationships between OHQOL and anxiety due to the low number of included studies (less than ten studies [28]). In order to rule out the probable single study effects on pooled effect sizes, sensitivity analysis was done, and the commonly used Jackknife method was applied [29].
Moderator analyses
Meta-regression was done to assess potential effects of moderators in the associations between OHQOL and depression and anxiety. Via meta-regression, tau-square values (τ2 or Tau2) and adjusted R-squared and I-squared residuals were explored. In random-effects models, tau-squared values estimate between-study variance [30]. I-squared residuals reflect effects of selected variables on observed heterogeneity, with lower values reflecting greater heterogeneity [31]. Adjusted R-squared values indicate the proportion of between-study variance explained by covariates. Higher adjusted R-squared values indicate greater variance related to selected variables [32]. In meta-regression, consideration of the number of included studies when interpreting the significance of a p-value is important: a threshold of 0.20 can be used with less than 10 studies; a threshold of 0.15 can be used for 10 and 20 included studies; and a threshold of 0.10 can be used when there is above 29 studies [33, 34].
Results
Study screening and selection
Overall, 5,178 papers were retrieved after the systematic search was conducted in the Web of Science (n = 1277), Scopus (n = 2394), PubMed (n = 817) and ProQuest (n = 690) databases. After removing duplicates (n = 1716), the titles and abstracts of the remaining papers were screened. Finally, 15 studies were included. The PRISMA flowchart (Fig. 1) shows the search, selection and analysis process.
Study description
Fifteen cross-sectional studies together having 14,419 participants from nine countries (Saudi Arabia, Romania, Korea, Japan, India, Germany, China, Brazil, and Australia) were included. The smallest sample size was 87 (from the Romania), and the largest sample size was 3615 (from Korea). The mean age of participants was 43.74 years with ages ranging between 15.9 and 77.9 years. Nearly half of the studies (7 out of 15) were conducted in high-income/developed countries. Overall, 54.92% of participants were female. Associations between OHQOL and depression were reported in 15 studies, while associations between OHQOL and anxiety were reported in five studies. Table 1 provides the summarized characteristics of included studies. Some studies reported crude data (5 out of 15), and some reported adjusted findings (10 out of 15). Due to the overall low number of included studies, we decided to include both crude and adjusted data and report them in Table 1. Also, one variable was defined as being adjusted or not which was included as a covariate in meta-regression, with results reported in Table 2.
Quality assessment
All but one study (14 out of 15) were identified as having low risk of bias. The methodological quality of these studies is reported in Table 1 using the total scores. According to the methodological quality assessment, the following results were obtained:
-
i.
Almost all studies (14 of 15) had selected participants which were representative or somewhat representative of the average in the target population.
-
ii.
Sample size was not justified in most studies (10 of 15).
-
iii.
None of the studies described the characteristics or the response rate among the non-responders and the responders.
-
iv.
All studies assessed the exposure (depression and anxiety) using validated measurement tools.
-
v.
Almost all studies (14 of 15) controlled for confounding factors based on the study design or analysis.
-
vi.
All studies assessed the outcomes using self-report measures.
-
vii.
Almost all studies (14 of 15) used clearly described statistical tests to analyze the data.
The two main methodological problems of the included studies were (i) not justifying the sample size and (ii) not providing a description regarding non-respondents.
Outcome measures
OHQOL and depression
A weak association between OHQOL and depression was suggested by the pooled estimation. Specifically, the Fisher’s z-score was 0.26 with a 95% confidence interval (CI) ranging between 0.17 and 0.35 (I2 = 96.2%; τ2 = 0.03). The forest plot related to the association between OHQOL and depression is shown in Fig. 2. Publication bias in associations between OHQOL and depression was assessed based on the funnel plot (Fig. 3) with the Egger’s test (p = 0.11). The funnel plot seemed asymmetric, so further assessment was conducted using the fill-and-trim method. Seven studies were imputed in the fill-and-trim method to correct for probable publication bias. The corrected association between OHQOL and depression was 0.14 using the value of Fisher’s z-score (95% CI: 0.05–0.23, τ2 = 0.04). Additionally, the sensitivity analysis indicated that no single study impacted the pooled effect size (Fig. 4). Via the findings from uni-variable meta-regression, heterogeneity in the association between OHQOL and depression was not impacted by any examined variables, including the OHQOL measures. The only potentially significant moderator in this association was the target population (explaining 15.25% of the variance, p = 0.12).
OHQOL and anxiety
A weak association between OHQOL and anxiety was suggested by the pooled estimation. Specifically, the Fisher’s z-score was 0.22 with a 95% CI ranging between 0.001 and 0.43 (I2 = 97.9%; τ2 = 0.06). The forest plot related to the association between OHQOL and anxiety is shown in Fig. 5. Potential publication bias relating to the association between OHQOL and anxiety was not assessed due to the low number of included studies (less than ten studies [28]). Additionally, the sensitivity analysis indicated that no single study impacted the pooled effect size (Fig. 6). According to findings from uni-variable meta-regression, heterogeneity in the association between OHQOL and anxiety was not impacted by any examined variables, including the OHQOL measures. The significant moderators in this association were the target population (explaining 35.68% of the variance, p = 0.18), percentage of female participants (explaining 58.07% of the variance, p = 0.09), NOS total score (explaining 40.12% of the variance, p = 0.16) and OHQOL measure (explaining 58.60% of the variance, p = 0.09). Due to the low number of included studies, further multivariable meta-regression analysis was not possible. The identified moderators should be considered in future investigations of associations between OHQOL and anxiety.
Discussion
With the use of rigorous methods, the present systematic review with meta-analysis obtained the following synthesized results. OHQOL was significant related to depression (Fisher’s z-score of 0.26) and anxiety (Fisher’s z-score of 0.22). The rigorous methodology included the (i) adherence to the PRISMA guidelines [19] with pre-registration [33]; (ii) use of two independent reviewers to screen 5,178 papers; (iii) data collection with a pre-designed Excel sheet to retrieve important information from the included studies; (iv) use of the NOS [22] to evaluate every included study; (v) effect size calculation with the consideration of different forms of numerical findings such as odds ratios and standardized mean differences [23, 24, 33]; (vi) evaluation of the potential heterogeneity severity [26]; (vii) use of Begg’s Tests, Funnel plots, and Jackknife methodologies to consider publication bias [27,28,29]; and (viii) use of meta-regression [30,31,32] to identify potential moderator effects in assessing the associations between depression or anxiety and OHQOL.
The association between depression and OHQOL identified in the synthesized data may reflect amotivation regarding oral hygiene behaviors. Individuals with depression often decrease their engagement in daily activities, including self-care and hygiene behaviors [8,9,10,11,12], and a prominent characteristic of depression is amotivation [13]. However, given that studies were cross-sectional in nature, the extent to which poor OHQOL may induce depression or features of depression may promote poor OHQOL warrants additional investigation.
The association between anxiety and OHQOL may also be explained by disrupted oral hygiene behaviors. Given worries, individuals with anxiety may not engage habitually in daily activities, including self-care and hygiene behaviors [8,9,10,11,12].
Given the present findings, several future directions in research and clinical practice may be recommended. First, almost all studies investigating associations between OHQOL and depression and anxiety were conducted in countries with upper intermediate or high-income levels. Therefore, more studies should be conducted in countries with lower intermediate or low-income levels. Second, most included studies in the present systematic review with meta-analysis used self-reported measures to assess OHQOL, depression, and anxiety. Although using self-reports with appropriate psychometric properties is acceptable, measurement biases (e.g., social desirability) exist. Therefore, future studies are needed to use other measures (e.g., measures assessed by healthcare providers) to minimize measurement biases. Third, the significant associations found between the two types of psychological distress (i.e., depression and anxiety) and OHQOL indicate the need for assessing and reducing possible depression or anxiety when healthcare providers design programs targeting oral health improvement.
The present systematic review with meta-analysis has the following limitations. First, all included studies used cross-sectional designs. Therefore, the findings regarding how OHQOL associates with depression and anxiety and OHQOL could not provide insight into causal relationships. In this regard, future longitudinal studies should examine relationships between depression/anxiety and oral health related quality of life. Second, measures of OHQOL in all studies were based on self-reports. Therefore, social desirability biases and recall biases may have influenced findings. Third, no data regarding response rates were described. Thus, the representativeness of the entire sample used for the present systematic review with meta-analysis could be non-representative based on response rates. Fourth, the present systematic review with meta-analysis only included five studies examining associations between OHQOL and anxiety. Therefore, publication bias was not examined for this relationship. Fifth, there were different OHQOL measures used in the synthesized studies. Although the present meta-analysis had used meta-regression model to confirm no/modest/limited impacts of different OHQOL measures on the synthesized findings, future meta-analyses are needed to reevaluate the role of different OHQOL measures when sufficient empirical evidence is reported. Lastly, the present systematic review and meta-analysis included papers with different populations (e.g., older adults, people with diabetes, and the general population). Therefore, the associations between OHQOL and depression/anxiety are likely to be diluted by the features of different populations. For example, the association between OHQOL and depression/anxiety in older adults might not be similar to the association in people with diabetes. In this regard, the associations found in the present study should be interpreted with caution. However, given that the available studies are not sufficient for us to conduct meta-analysis for a specific population, future meta-analyses may need to be conducted when empirical evidence is sufficient for specific populations.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the synthesized findings from the present systematic review with meta-analysis indicated that both depression and anxiety were weakly associated with individuals’ OHQOL. Although the synthesized associations were not strong, they were significant, indicating that depression and anxiety might also be considered when one wants to improve individuals’ OHQOL. Therefore, when designing programs to improve OHQOL, healthcare providers should consider depression and anxiety. However, given that the present findings were derived from cross-sectional studies, causal relationships cannot be concluded. Additional research is thus needed.
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, upon reasonable request.
References
Hajek A, Lieske B, König H-H, Zwar L, Kretzler B, Moszka N, et al. Oral health, anxiety symptoms and depressive symptoms: findings from the survey of health, ageing and retirement in Europe. Psychogeriatrics. 2023;23:571–7.
Cho S. Socioeconomic disparities in adolescents' caries prevalence: do oral health-related behaviors play intermediary roles? Asian J Soc Health Behav. 2023;6:56–63.
Baiju RM, Peter E, Varghese NO, Sivaram R. Oral health and quality of life: current concepts. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11:Ze21–ze26.
Pakpour AH, Lin CY, Kumar S, Fridlund B, Jansson H. Predictors of oral health‐related quality of life in Iranian adolescents: a prospective study. J Investig Clin Dent. 2018;9:e12264.
Lockhart PB, Bolger AF, Papapanou PN, Osinbowale O, Trevisan M, Levison ME, et al. Periodontal disease and atherosclerotic vascular disease: does the evidence support an independent association? A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2012;125:2520–44.
Federation FWD. FDI policy statement on oral infection/inflammation as a risk factor for systemic diseases. Int Dent J. 2013;63:289–90.
Mahmud S, Mohsin M, Dewan MN, Muyeed A. The global prevalence of depression, anxiety, stress, and insomnia among general population during COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Trends Psychol. 2023;31:143–70.
Shrestha M, Ng A, Al-Ghareeb A, Alenazi F, Gray R. Association between subthreshold depression and self-care behaviors in people with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review of observational studies. Syst Rev. 2020;9:1–9.
Gianfredi V, Ferrara P, Pennisi F, Casu G, Amerio A, Odone A, et al. Association between daily pattern of physical activity and depression: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19:6505.
Elhai JD, Rozgonjuk D, Alghraibeh AM, Yang H. Disrupted daily activities from interruptive smartphone notifications: Relations with depression and anxiety severity and the mediating role of boredom proneness. Soc Sci Comput Rev. 2021;39:20–37.
Islam MS, Tasnim R, Sujan MSH, Ferdous M, Sikder MT, Masud JHB, et al. Depressive symptoms associated with COVID-19 preventive practice measures, daily activities in home quarantine and suicidal behaviors: Findings from a large-scale online survey in Bangladesh. BMC Psychiatry. 2021;21:1–12.
Kim S, Choe K, Lee K. Depression, loneliness, social support, activities of daily living, and life satisfaction in older adults at high-risk of dementia. Int J Environ Res. Public Health. 2020;17:9448.
APA: Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). In.: American Psychiatric Association; (2013).
Pengpid S, Peltzer K. Anxiety-induced sleep disturbances among in-school adolescents in the United Arab Emirates: prevalence and associated factors. Asian J Soc Health Behav. 2022;5:18.
Nayan MIH, Uddin MSG, Hossain MI, Alam MM, Zinnia MA, Haq I, et al. Comparison of the performance of machine learning-based algorithms for predicting depression and anxiety among University Students in Bangladesh: A result of the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Asian J Soc Health Behav. 2022;5:75.
Hackley DM, Jain S, Pagni SE, Finkelman M, Ntaganira J, Morgan JP. Oral health conditions and correlates: a National Oral Health Survey of Rwanda. Glob Health Action. 2021;14:1904628.
Manohar PS, Subramaniam P. Oral health-related quality of life and oral hygiene of children and adolescents with hearing impairment. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2022;15:311.
Pakpour AH, Kumar S, Scheerman JF, Lin C-Y, Fridlund B, Jansson H. Oral health-related quality of life in Iranian patients with spinal cord injury: a case–control study. Injury. 2016;47:1345–52.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group* P. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:264–9.
Oral health related quality of life and mental health: a systematic review [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023389372]
Morgan RL, Whaley P, Thayer KA, Schünemann HJ. Identifying the PECO: a framework for formulating good questions to explore the association of environmental and other exposures with health outcomes. Environ Int. 2018;121:1027.
Luchini C, Stubbs B, Solmi M, Veronese N. Assessing the quality of studies in meta-analyses: advantages and limitations of the Newcastle Ottawa Scale. World J Meta-Anal. 2017;5:80–84.
Lipsey MW, Wilson DB: Practical meta-analysis: SAGE publications, Inc; (2001).
Alimoradi Z, Golboni F, Griffiths MD, Broström A, Lin C-Y, Pakpour AH. Weight-related stigma and psychological distress: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Nutr. 2019;39:2001–13.
Borenstein M, Hedges L, Higgins J, Rothstein H: Complex data structures. Introduction to Meta-Analysis John Wiley & Sons Ltd, West Sussex, UK:215-45 (2009).
Huedo-Medina TB, Sánchez-Meca J, Marín-Martínez F, Botella J. Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I² index? Psychol Methods. 2006;11:193.
Rothstein HR, Sutton AJ, Borenstein M: Publication bias in meta-analysis. Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments. 1-7 (2005).
Borenstein M: Common mistakes in meta-analysis and how to avoid them. (No Title) (2019).
Hedges LV, Olkin I: Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Elsevier Inc.: Academic press; (1985).
Deeks J, Higgins J, Altmann D: Incorporating heterogeneity into random-effects models. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions (2013).
Panityakul T, Bumrungsup C, Knapp G. On estimating residual heterogeneity in random-effects meta-regression: a comparative study. J Stat Theory Appl. 2013;12:253–65.
Harbord RM, Higgins JP. Meta-regression in Stata. Stata J. 2008;8:493–519.
Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JP, Rothstein HR: Introduction to meta-analysis: John Wiley & Sons; (2021).
Baker WL, Michael White C, Cappelleri JC, Kluger J, Coleman CI, From the Health Outcomes P, Group EC. Understanding heterogeneity in meta-analysis: the role of meta-regression. Int J Clin Pract. 2009;63:1426–34.
Kumar N, Thippeswamy H, KN RS. Relationship between depression and oral health related quality of life among institutionalized elderly population of Mysore City, India–a cross sectional study. EXECUTIVE EDITOR. 2018;9:137.
Park KE, Lee H, Kwon YD, Kim S. Association between changes in oral health-related quality of life and depressive symptoms in the korean elderly population. Int J Public Health. 2023;68:1605403.
Hajek A, König H-H. Oral health-related quality of life, probable depression and probable anxiety: evidence from a representative survey in Germany. BMC Oral Health. 2022;22:1–6.
Sebastiani AM, Dos Santos KM, Cavalcante RC, Pivetta Petinati MF, Signorini L, Antunes LAA, et al. Depression, temporomandibular disorders, and genetic polymorphisms in IL6 impact on oral health-related quality of life in patients requiring orthognathic surgery. Qual Life Res. 2020;29:3315–23.
Baldiotti ALP, Amaral-Freitas G, Barbosa MCF, Moreira PR, Machado RA, Coletta RD, et al. Associations between anxiety, depression, chronic pain and oral health-related quality of life, happiness, and polymorphisms in adolescents’ genes. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20:3321.
Thirunavukkarasu A, Alharbi MS, Salahuddin M, Al-Hazmi AH, ALruwaili BF, Alsaidan AA, et al. Evaluation of oral health-related quality of life and its association with mental health status of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in the post-COVID-19 pandemic era: A study from Central Saudi Arabia. Front. Public Health. 2023;11:1158979.
Abdelsalam S, Van Den Boom W, Higgs P, Dietze P, Erbas B. The association between depression and oral health related quality of life in people who inject drugs. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021;229:109121.
Zhang Z, Tian Y, Zhong F, Li C-F, Dong S-M, Huang Y, et al. Association between oral health-related quality of life and depressive symptoms in Chinese college students: Fitness Improvement Tactics in Youths (FITYou) project. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2019;17:1–8.
Li H, Kong F. Effect of morbidities, depression, anxiety, and stress on oral health-related quality of life among migrant elderly following children in Weifang, China. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19:4677.
Oancea R, Timar B, Papava I, Cristina BA, Ilie AC, Dehelean L. Influence of depression and self-esteem on oral health-related quality of life in students. J Int Med Res. 2020;48:0300060520902615.
Noguchi S, Makino M, Haresaku S, Shimada K, Naito T. Insomnia and depression impair oral health‐related quality of life in the old‐old. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2017;17:893–7.
Satishkumar CC, Nair SJ, Joseph AM, Suresh S, Muthupandian I, Kumaresan S, et al. Relationship between perceived chewing ability, oral health related quality of life and depressive symptoms among completely edentulous individuals. Indian J Dent Res. 2021;32:211.
Ohi T, Murakami T, Komiyama T, Miyoshi Y, Endo K, Hiratsuka T, et al. Oral health‐related quality of life is associated with the prevalence and development of depressive symptoms in older Japanese individuals: the Ohasama study. Gerodontology. 2022;39:204–12.
Yap AU, Zhang MJ, Cao Y, Lei J, Fu KY. Comparison of psychological states and oral health–related quality of life of patients with differing severity of temporomandibular disorders. J Oral Rehab. 2022;49:177–85.
Funding
This research was supported by Qazvin University of Medical Sciences. Open access funding provided by Jönköping University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Zainab Alimoradi: Conceptualization, Validation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Resources, Writing—original draft, Writing—review & editing, Visualization. Elahe jafari: Validation, Investigation, Writing—review & editing. Zahra Roshandel: Validation, Investigation, Writing—review & editing. Marc N Potenza: Writing—review & editing, Visualization. Chung-Ying Lin: Validation, Investigation, Resources, Writing—original draft, Writing—review & editing, Visualization. Amir H Pakpour: Conceptualization, Validation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Resources, Writing—original draft, Writing—review & editing, Visualization, Supervision, Project administration.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethics declarations
Based on the Institutional Review Boards for ethical conduct of research, the ethics approval was not required for this study, as it was conducted using a systematic review approach using publicly accessible evidence.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Alimoradi, Z., jafari, E., Roshandel, Z. et al. Meta-analysis with systematic review to synthesize associations between oral health related quality of life and anxiety and depression. BDJ Open 10, 9 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41405-024-00191-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41405-024-00191-x