Abstract
Objective
This study aimed to evaluate salivary pH changes after consuming three types of milk in children aged 3–5 years. The null hypothesis was that no statistically significant difference would be noted in the salivary pH between high-protein, full-fat, and sweetened milk groups at different time points.
Materials and methods
This was a double-blind, pilot randomized controlled crossover trial. 30 Children have undergone three experimental sessions with a 1-week washout period. Each child was given 250 mL of one of the following types of milk: high-protein, full-fat, or sweetened milk. The salivary pH was measured at the baseline (t0) after 5 (t1), 10 (t2), 15 (t3), 30 (t4), and 60 (t5) minutes of milk consumption, using a pH saliva indicator strip.
Results
There is a sharp drop in salivary pH after 5 min of sweetened (P < 0.05) and full-fat milk consumption (p < 0.05). However, the initial drop in the salivary pH was found to remain above the critical level. For the high-protein milk group, salivary pH decreased slightly after 5 min but was similar to that at the baseline (p = 0.573). In the high-protein milk group (p < 0.05), the salivary pH was slightly greater than the baseline value at t5.
Conclusions
The study shows an initial suggestion that milk is a non-cariogenic beverage, even when sugar is added. Furthermore, high-protein milk has a protective effect from dental caries.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Milk is a liquid produced by mammals to meet the nutritional needs of newborns, and it is considered the primary source of nourishment in proper proportions [1]. In addition, it is considered non-cariogenic due to the high levels of calcium and phosphorus that exhibit antimicrobial properties and increase the salivary pH [1, 2]. Although milk contains lactose, which is moderately cariogenic, lactose is the least cariogenic fermentable sugar [2]. About 18.1% of daily protein intake is provided by milk and dairy products [3]. High-protein milk contains 100% skimmed cow milk and 6 g of protein per 100 mL [4, 5]. Protein is the most abundant organic compound throughout the body, and it is responsible for the buffering properties of saliva [6]. Whole milk contains 3.5% of fat [7], and children that are younger than 2 years should be provided with full-fat milk and then move to reduced-fat milk [8]. For infants, breast milk and formula milk are the primary sources of dietary fat, while older children get fat from animal products and vegetable oils [9]. Whole milk contains 0.04 g of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (n-3 PUFAs) per 237 mL or in one cup [10]. Fat provides essential fatty acids, which have a functional and structural role in the body [11]. Flavored milk is a dairy drink that is usually sweetened and contains 9.1 g of sugar per 100 mL [12]. Flavored milk is widely acceptable among children since they consume flavored milk more than plain milk [13]. However, flavored milk is highly processed and contains additives with no nutritional value. In addition, it exhibits a cariogenic potential due to its high sugar content [14].
Human saliva consists of more than 99% water and less than 1% organic and inorganic substances. The flow rate of unstimulated saliva is about 0.3–0.4 ml/min [15], and the normal pH range of saliva is 6.2–7.6 [16]. The salivary flow and saliva pH increase during chewing [17]. However, the salivary pH decreases after consuming cariogenic food, reaching the critical pH (pH = 5.5) or less, at which enamel demineralization begins [18]. Salivary buffer capacity aims to protect teeth from dental caries through the neutralization of plaque acids and products of acidogenic microorganisms. The normal range of salivary buffer capacity is estimated to be 3–30 mg/100 mL [19]. Milk has remineralization potential due to the high content of calcium, phosphorous, and casein phosphopeptides [2, 3]. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate salivary pH changes after consuming high-protein, full-fat, and sweetened milk in children aged 3–5 years. The null hypothesis was that no statistically significant difference would be noted in the salivary pH between high-protein, full-fat, and sweetened milk groups at different time points.
Materials and methods
Study design and ethics
This was a double-blind, pilot randomized controlled crossover trial where each participant would be their comparator. It was conducted for 2 months at Damascus University. Ethical approval was provided by the Institutional Review Board at Damascus University (N7748), and it was conducted in full accordance with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration [20] and CONSORT statement [21]. Written informed consent was obtained from the participants’ legal guardians. The current trial was registered at Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12623000773639).
Sample size calculation
Sample size was calculated using G*Power software 3.1.9.4 (Heinrich- Hein-Universitat-Dusseldorf, Germany; http://www.gpower. hhu.de/). Effect size f = 0.5996822/α err prob = 0.05/ Power (1-β err prob) = 0.80/ Number of groups = 3/ Total sample size = 30. Effect size was estimated according to the results of a pilot study of five participants, and a sample size of 30 children was sufficient to obtain an effect size of 0.59.
Recruitment and eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
-
1.
Healthy children that are free of systemic diseases.
-
2.
Children with good oral hygiene, according to Oral Hygiene Index (OHI) [22].
-
3.
Children aged 3–5 years.
-
4.
Children who are definitely positive, or positive according to Frankl’s behavior rating scale.
-
5.
Children with full primary dentition.
Exclusion criteria
-
1.
Taking medications that affect the salivary flow rate.
-
2.
Intolerance to milk protein.
-
3.
Children undergoing orthodontic treatment.
33 patients were assessed for eligibility, and 3 were excluded due to not meeting the inclusion criteria. The modified CONSORT flowchart is presented in Fig. 1.
Intervention
Children have undergone three experimental sessions with a 1-week washout period [23]. The sequence of the milk types for the three interval sessions was randomized using a computer algorithm. Children were instructed not to brush their teeth, eat, and drink for 2 h before this study [24]. Salivary pH was recorded at the baseline (t0) then each child was given 250 mL of one of the following types of milk:
-
1.
High-protein milk (High Protein Milk, Hawa Al Sham Dairies & Cheese Co., Damascus, Syria).
-
2.
Full-fat milk (Long Life Milk, Hawa Al Sham Dairies & Cheese Co., Damascus, Syria).
-
3.
Sweetened milk (Chocolate Flavored Milk, Hawa Al Sham Dairies & Cheese Co., Damascus, Syria).
The salivary pH was measured after 5 (t1), 10 (t2), 15 (t3), 30 (t4), and 60 (t5) minutes of milk consumption. Salivary pH was measured using a pH saliva indicator strip (Duotest pH 3.5–6.8, Macherey-Nagel® GmbH & Co. KG, Düren, Germany), which is to Alkarad et al. [25] study. Children were instructed to allow saliva to flow passively in the mouth for 5 min at the six-time points then they were asked to split 2 mL of saliva into a graduated tube. The pH saliva indicator strip was immersed in saliva for 1 min then the color change was recorded and evaluated according to the reference color chart [25]. Both the data assessor and the statistician were blinded to group allocations.
The composition of the milk samples according to the manufacturing industry were as follows:
-
1.
High-protein milk (protein: 25 g/100 mL, fat: 3 g/100 mL, and carbohydrate: 5.1 g/100 mL).
-
2.
Full-fat milk (protein: 3.1 g/100 mL, fat: 3 g/100 mL, and carbohydrate: 5.1 g/100 mL).
-
3.
Sweetened milk (protein: 3.1 g/100 mL, fat: 0.5 g/100 mL, and carbohydrate: 11 g/100 mL).
The starting pH of the milk samples was tested using pH meter (WTW pH/Ion 340i meter, Xylem Analytics Germany Sales GmbH & Co. KG, WTW., Weilheim, Germany). The starting pH was as follows:
-
1.
High-protein milk (pH = 5.84).
-
2.
Full-fat milk (pH = 5.82).
-
3.
Sweetened milk (pH = 5.51).
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS software version 24 (IBM Corp., Armonk, USA). Descriptive statistics were calculated and provided as mean, standard deviation, standard error, minimum, and maximum. Kurskal–Wallis test was performed to compare non-paired data, and Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare paired data. Statistical significance was adjusted at 0.05 (p < 0.05).
Results
A total of 33 patients were assessed for eligibility, and 3 were excluded due to not meeting the inclusion criteria. The sample obtained was 30 children, and more than half of them, were male (n = 20; 67%). The mean age was 4 years (SD 0.81; range 3–5 years). The mean of the dmft score was 4.8 ± 3.9. The salivary pH values were listed as mean, standard deviation (SD), standard error (SE), minimum (Min), and maximum (Max) for each group at different time points (Table 1).
No statistically significant difference was found between the mean salivary pH values at t0 (p = 0.306), suggesting that the baseline data are well-balanced. However, the Kruskal–Wallis test indicated a significant difference between the study groups at t1, t2, t3, and t4 (p < 0.05) (Table 2). The pairwise comparison test indicated a significant difference between high-protein milk and full-fat milk groups at t1 (p < 0.05) and a significant difference between high-protein milk and sweetened milk groups at t1, t2, t3, and t4 (p < 0.05). In addition, there was a statistically significant difference between full-fat milk and sweetened milk groups at t1, t2, and t3 (p < 0.05) (Table 3).
In the high-protein milk group, a significant difference was found in the salivary pH at t4 and t5 compared to t0 (p < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference in the salivary pH at t1 (p = 0.573), t2 (p = 0.876), and t3 (p = 0.222) compared to t0. In the full-fat milk group, a significant difference was noted in the salivary pH at t1, t2, and t3 (p < 0.05), but no significant difference was observed at t4 (p = 1.000) and t5 (p = 0.058) compared to t0. In the sweetened milk group, there was a significant difference at the five-time points compared to t0 (p < 0.05) (Table 4).
The Kinetics of salivary pH were presented in Fig. 2. There is a sharp drop in salivary pH after 5 min of sweetened and full-fat milk consumption. Subsequently, a gradual recovery was noted within 60 min. However, the initial drop in the salivary pH was found to remain above the critical level. For the high-protein milk group, salivary pH decreased slightly after 5 min but was similar to that at the baseline. In high-protein and full-fat milk groups, the salivary pH was slightly greater than the baseline value at t5.
Discussion
Dental caries is the most common chronic disease in both children and adults. The frequent consumption of dietary free sugars between mealtimes increases the risk of dental caries, especially in schoolchildren [26]. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, no study has ever evaluated the cariogenic potential of various types of milk among children. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate salivary pH changes after consuming high-protein, full-fat, and sweetened milk in children aged 3–5 years.
Salivary pH is a biomarker for many oral and systemic diseases, such as hypertension, insulin resistance, chronic kidney disease, depression, periodontal diseases, and dental caries. [27, 28] In addition, salivary pH is used to evaluate the cariogenic potential of certain foods and beverages [29]. In the current study, litmus paper was used for measuring salivary pH due to its high reliability and quick documentation [30], which is to Alkarad et al. [25] study. In this study, the milk intake was 250 mL, which is equivalent to one carton of milk [31]. In addition, the washout period was 1 week, which is to Barajas-Torres et al. [23] study.
In the high-protein milk group, salivary pH decreased slightly after 5 min but was similar to that at the baseline, and there was no significant difference in the salivary pH at t1, t2, and t3 compared to t0. In addition, the salivary pH was slightly greater than the baseline value at t5, and there was a significant difference in the salivary pH at t4 and t5 compared to t0. This result could be explained by the high protein content, which has a high buffering capacity. High protein concentration increases the salivary pH since it increases the flow rate of saliva [32, 33]. As a result, high-protein milk has a non-cariogenic potential and a protective effect from dental caries. This finding is in agreement with the one reported by Sulastri et al. [34], suggesting that high-protein milk has a high buffering capacity., and the salivary pH was measured using pH strip. In addition, according to Savira et al. [35], salivary pH value increase after consumption of Ultra high-temperature milk because of its high protein content.
For the full-fat milk group, there is an initial drop in salivary pH after 5 min of consumption, and a significant difference was noted in the salivary pH at t1, t2, and t3 compared to t0. Subsequently, a gradual recovery was noted within 60 min, and no significant difference was observed at t4 and t5 compared to t0. This could be explained by the fact that milk fat adsorbs to the surface of the enamel and may play a protective effect [32]. However, unlike this finding, Azrak et al. [36] suggested that, despite the caries-protective components, since of the lactose substance, milk can only be prescribed for constrained consumption. In addition, Junge et al. [37] found that plain milk can reduce Streptococcus mutans counts only when it is supplemented with probiotic.
The result of the current study suggested that there is a significant difference between high-protein milk and full-fat milk groups at t1. This finding is consistent with one reported by Seralurin et al. [38] suggesting that there is a decrease in the salivary pH value after consuming powdered cow milk, which has higher fat content compared to pure cow milk.
In the sweetened milk group, there is a sharp drop in salivary pH after 5 min of consumption. Subsequently, a gradual recovery was noted within 60 min and there was a significant difference at the five-time points compared to t0. This result is similarly reported by Hirani et al. [39]. However, according to Bhat et al. [40] study, the salivary pH reached the baseline level at 30 min after sweetened milk consumption. A possible explanation for this finding is that the mean dmft score was higher in the current study. However, the initial drop in the salivary pH was found above the critical level, which causes enamel demineralization [18]. As a result, the sweetened milk in this study is a non-cariogenic beverage. This finding is similar with Bhat et al. [40] study, suggesting that the salivary pH value returns to the baseline after 120 min of sweetened milk consumption. Navit et al. [41] found that adding flavors to milk does not cause a significant change in the salivary pH after their intake, but the significant drop was noted immediately after their consumption. Furthermore, Khodadadi et al. [42] reported that because of the antioxidant properties of certain additives, flavored milk could be recommended for children. Shah et al. [43] suggested that when sugar is added to milk, the salivary pH does not fall below the critical level. This result could be explained by the fact that milk has an anti-caries activity due to its content of casein phosphopeptides, phosphate, and calcium ions, which hinder demineralization. In addition, milk enzymes inhibit the proliferation of acidogenic bacteria [44]. Hence, milk has a protective effect from dental caries even when sugar is added. However, this finding is in contrast with the one reported by Bhure et al. [45] result suggesting that milk has a cariogenic potential when sugary additives are added to it. This could be attributed to the high carbohydrate content of Bourn Vita (17 g/100 mL), and Horlicks (14 g/100 mL) sugary additives, when compared with the carbohydrate content reported in the current study (11 g/100 mL).
This study has limitations. Cross-over trial designs are subjected to carryover effects, and it is hard to accurately estimate the washout period required. In addition, the effect of each type of milk was only tested once. As milk is not consumed only once by each child. Furthermore, litmus paper is not as accurate as pH meter [46].
Conclusions
Within the limitations of this study, it shows an initial suggestion that milk is a non-cariogenic beverage, even when sugar is added. Furthermore, high-protein milk has a non-cariogenic potential and high buffering capacity. Hence, it has a protective effect from dental caries. Further trials with larger sample sizes are recommended to ascertain results. In addition, it would be appropriate to conduct an experiment where milk is consumed 3 times per day during a period of at least 7 days. Furthermore, it is recommended to use a microelectrode technology, which is more precise to evaluate the salivary pH changes. However, this method was not used due to its unavailability.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Davoodi SH, Shahbazi R, Esmaeili S, Sohrabvandi S, Mortazavian A, Jazayeri S, et al. Health-related aspects of milk proteins. Iran J Pharm Res IJPR. 2016;15:573.
Shkembi B, Huppertz T. Impact of dairy products and plant-based alternatives on dental health: food matrix effects. Nutrients. 2023;15:1469.
Górska-Warsewicz H, Rejman K, Laskowski W, Czeczotko M. Milk and dairy products and their nutritional contribution to the average polish diet. Nutrients. 2019;11:1771.
Antunes IC, Bexiga R, Pinto C, Roseiro LC, Quaresma MA. Cow’s milk in human nutrition and the emergence of plant-based milk alternatives. Foods. 2022;12:99.
Huschtscha Z, Parr A, Porter J, Costa RJ. The effects of a high-protein dairy milk beverage with or without progressive resistance training on fat-free mass, skeletal muscle strength and power, and functional performance in healthy active older adults: a 12-week randomized controlled trial. Front Nutr. 2021;8:644865.
Jayasinghe TN, Harrass S, Erdrich S, King S, Eberhard J. Protein intake and oral health in older adults—a narrative review. Nutrients. 2022;14:4478.
Engel S, Elhauge M, Tholstrup T. Effect of whole milk compared with skimmed milk on fasting blood lipids in healthy adults: a 3-week randomized crossover study. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2018;72:249–54.
Vanderhout SM, Aglipay M, Torabi N, Jüni P, da Costa BR, Birken CS, et al. Whole milk compared with reduced-fat milk and childhood overweight: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr. 2020;111:266–79.
Martin CR, Ling PR, Blackburn GL. Review of infant feeding: key features of breast milk and infant formula. Nutrients. 2016;8:279.
Buse K. Characterization of protein and fat in dairy feeds and implications on digestibility and milk composition. Theses and Dissertations in Animal Science. 2020:1–140.
Rafeeq H, Ahmad S, Tareen MB, Shahzad KA, Bashir A, Jabeen R, et al. Biochemistry of fat soluble vitamins, sources, biochemical functions and toxicity. Haya Saudi J Life Sci. 2020;5:188–96.
Coyle DH, Ndanuko R, Singh S, Huang P, Wu JH. Variations in sugar content of flavored milks and yogurts: a cross-sectional study across 3 countries. Curr Dev Nutr. 2019;3:nzz060.
Fayet-Moore F. Effect of flavored milk vs plain milk on total milk intake and nutrient provision in children. Nutr Rev. 2016;74:1–7.
Al-Jobair A, Khounganian R. Evaluating the cariogenic potential of flavored milk: an experimental study using rat model. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2015;16:42–7.
Pedersen AM, Belstrøm D. The role of natural salivary defences in maintaining a healthy oral microbiota. J Dent. 2019;80:S3–12.
Iorgulescu G. Saliva between normal and pathological. Important factors in determining systemic and oral health. J Med Life. 2009;2:303.
Baliga S, Muglikar S, Kale R. Salivary pH: a diagnostic biomarker. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2013;17:461.
Örtengren U, Lehrkinder A, Safarloo A, Axelsson J, Lingström P. Opportunities for caries prevention using an ion-releasing coating material: a randomised clinical study. Odontology. 2021;109:358–67.
Pandey P, Reddy NV, Rao VA, Saxena A, Chaudhary CP. Estimation of salivary flow rate, pH, buffer capacity, calcium, total protein content and total antioxidant capacity in relation to dental caries severity, age and gender. Contemp Clin Dent. 2015;6:S65.
PP R. Human experimentation. Code of ethics of the world medical association. Declaration of Helsinki. Br Med J. 1964;2:177.
Cuschieri S. The CONSORT statement. Saudi J Anaesth. 2019;13:S27.
Okoceva-Ivanovska OR, Sarakinova O, Zabokova-Bilbilova E, Mijoska AN, Stav-reva N. Oral hygiene index in early childhood caries, before and after topicalfluoride treatment. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2018;6:378–83.
Barajas-Torres GC, Klünder-Klünder M, Garduño-Espinosa J, Parra-Ortega I, Franco-Hernández MI, Miranda-Lora AL. Effects of carbonated beverage consumption on oral pH and bacterial proliferation in adolescents: a randomized crossover clinical trial. Life. 2022;12:1776.
Quritum SM, Ali AM, Raouf MM, Omar TE, Dowidar KM. Evaluation of salivary parameters and Streptococcus’ Mutans count in children with cerebral palsy in Egypt: a case control study. BMC Oral Health. 2022;22:411.
Alkarad L, Alkhouli M, Dashash M. Remineralization of teeth with casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate: analysis of salivary pH and the rate of salivary flow. BDJ Open. 2023;9:16.
Moynihan P. Sugars and dental caries: evidence for setting a recommended threshold for intake. Adv Nutr. 2016;7:149–56.
Dongiovanni P, Meroni M, Casati S, Goldoni R, Thomaz DV, Kehr NS, et al. Salivary biomarkers: novel noninvasive tools to diagnose chronic inflammation. Int J Oral Sci. 2023;15:27.
Seethalakshmi C, Reddy RJ, Asifa N, Prabhu S. Correlation of salivary pH, incidence of dental caries and periodontal status in diabetes mellitus patients: a cross-sectional study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10:ZC12.
Pachori A, Kambalimath H, Maran S, Niranjan B, Bhambhani G, Malhotra G. Evaluation of changes in salivary pH after intake of different eatables and beverages in children at different time intervals. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2018;11:177.
Song CW, Kim HK, Kim ME. Clinical usefulness of pH papers in the measurement of salivary pH. J Oral Med Pain. 2015;40:124–9.
Henry C, Whiting SJ, Phillips T, Finch SL, Zello GA, Vatanparast H. Impact of the removal of chocolate milk from school milk programs for children in Saskatoon, Canada. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2015;40:245–50.
Timimi RJ, Jassim HS, Abd ST. The adsorption of skimmed milk and full-fat milk solution on the surface of natural teeth. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng. 2018;454:012133.
Shaila M, Pai GP, Shetty P. Salivary protein concentration, flow rate, buffer capacity and pH estimation: a comparative study among young and elderly subjects, both normal and with gingivitis and periodontitis. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2013;17:42.
Sulastri S, Sulistyani H. Differences in saliva pH before and after drinking packed cow’s milk in children aged 6–12 years. J Drug Deliv Ther. 2022;12:27–30.
Savira CN, Hakim RF, Sungkar S. Perbedaan pH saliva sebelum dan sesudah mengkonsumsi susu formula dengan susu UHT (studi pada anak di Panti Asuhan Nirmala Banda Aceh). J Caninus Dent 2017;2:150–6.
Azrak B, Willershausen B, Meyer N, Callaway A. Course of changes in salivary pH-values after intake of different beverages in young children. Oral Health Prev Dent. 2008;6:159–64.
Juneja A, Kakade A. Evaluating the effect of probiotic containing milk on salivary mutans streptococci levels. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2012;37:9–14.
Seralurin IT, Wowor VN, Ticoalu SH. Perbedaan pH Saliva Setelah Mengonsumsi Susu Sapi Murni dan Susu Sapi Bubuk. e-GiGi. 2018;6:1.
Hirani H, Iqbal N, Bijarani AN, Hashmi UP, Khurram S, Baig NJ. Effects of different beverages on salivary ph and time taken by saliva to regain normal pH among teenagers. J Pharm Res Int. 2021;33:140–4.
Bhat SS, Hegde SK, Bhat VS, Ramya KM, Jodalli PS. Acidogenic potential of plain milk, milk with sugar, milk with cornflakes and milk cornflakes with sugar: a comparative study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2016;9:218.
Navit S, Agarwal S, Khan SA, Sharma A, Jaebeen S, Grover N. Little color, little flavor of different kinds of commercially available flavored milk and their consumption effect on salivary pH value in children: an in vivo study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2020;13:S87.
Khodadadi E, Ghasemi N, Pouramir M, Bijani A. Total antioxidant property and pH change of dental plaque and saliva in 6-11-year-old children after consumption of flavored milk. Casp J Dent Res. 2013;2:15–22.
Shah AF. Comparison of changes in salivary pH levels after consumption of plain milk and milk mixed with Sugar. Int Arch Integr Med. 2016;3:174–8.
Levine RS. Milk, flavoured milk products and caries. Br Dent J. 2001;191:20.
Bhure S, Musani I, Survashe P. Effect on salivary pH value after consumption of commercially marketed” Health Drinks”: an in vivo study. Univers Res J Dent. 2016;6:34.
Vishalini L, VMRF-DU S, Ramesh M. Comparison of efficacy of salivary ph strips with ph meter using saliva of smokers and non-smokers-a single instituitional study. Journal of Critical Reviews. 2020;7:1522–31.
Funding
This research is funded by Damascus University—funder No. 501100020595.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
RZ collected data, extracted the data and performed the statistical analysis, writing-original draft; MK wrote the manuscript; NB research concept and design, performed critical revision of the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethical approval
Ethical approval was provided by the ethics board at Damascus University (N7748).
Informed consent
Written informed consent was obtained from patients’ legal guardians.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Zamzam, R., Karkoutly, M. & Bshara, N. Effect of various types of milk on salivary pH among children: a pilot randomized controlled crossover trial. BDJ Open 9, 44 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41405-023-00170-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41405-023-00170-8