Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Advice
  • Published:

Innocent banter or workplace discrimination?

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. GQ Littler. UK employment tribunal cases relating to 'banter' up 45% in a year. Available online at: www.gqlittler.com/resources/news-and-views/uk-employment-tribunal-cases-relating-to-banter-up-45-in-a-year.htm (accessed October 2023).

  2. GQ Littler. 66 claims related to 'banter' were heard by the Employment Tribunals last year. Available online at: www.gqlittler.com/resources/news-and-views/66-claims-related-to-banter-were-heard-by-the-employment-tribunals-last-year.htm (accessed October 2023).

  3. Pitters K. Banter is no laughing matter in the dental setting. BDJ In Pract 2022; 35: 34.

  4. Fleming v McGill Facilities Management Ltd. 4101494/2022.

  5. Equality Act 2010.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ezra Moffatt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moffatt, E. Innocent banter or workplace discrimination?. BDJ In Pract 36, 35 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41404-023-2192-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41404-023-2192-6

Search

Quick links