Abstract
Brownlee Reservoir is a mercury (Hg)-impaired hydroelectric reservoir that exhibits dynamic hydrological and geochemical conditions and is located within the Hells Canyon Complex in Idaho, USA. Methylmercury (MeHg) contamination in fish is a concern in the reservoir. While MeHg production has historically been attributed to sulfate-reducing bacteria and methanogenic archaea, microorganisms carrying the hgcA gene are taxonomically and metabolically diverse and the major biogeochemical cycles driving mercury (Hg) methylation are not well understood. In this study, Hg speciation and redox-active compounds were measured throughout Brownlee Reservoir across the stratified period in four consecutive years (2016–2019) to identify the location where and redox conditions under which MeHg is produced. Metagenomic sequencing was performed on a subset of samples to characterize the microbial community with hgcA and identify possible links between biogeochemical cycles and MeHg production. Biogeochemical profiles suggested in situ water column Hg methylation was the major source of MeHg. These profiles, combined with genome-resolved metagenomics focused on hgcA-carrying microbes, indicated that MeHg production occurs in this system under nitrate- or manganese-reducing conditions, which were previously thought to preclude Hg-methylation. Using this multidisciplinary approach, we identified the cascading effects of interannual variability in hydrology on the redox status, microbial metabolic strategies, abundance and metabolic diversity of Hg methylators, and ultimately MeHg concentrations throughout the reservoir. This work expands the known conditions conducive to producing MeHg and suggests that the Hg-methylation mitigation efforts by nitrate or manganese amendment may be unsuccessful in some locations.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Reservoirs provide critical drinking water supply, flood control, and renewable energy. However, they also have significant impacts on biogeochemical cycles, in part due to thermal and redox stratification facilitated by the riverine-to-lacustrine transition and abundance of terminal electron acceptors (TEAs) and labile organic carbon [1]. This makes reservoirs known hotspots for microbial methylation of inorganic mercury (Hg(II)i) to toxic methylmercury (MeHg) [2, 3]. MeHg can be incorporated into the food web [4, 5], partition to particles [6], or be exported downstream as the hypolimnion erodes and the reservoir mixes [7, 8], leading to Hg accumulation in downstream food webs [9]. Understanding where MeHg is produced in reservoirs and identifying the primary biogeochemical drivers of MeHg production is critical to predict Hg impacts on aquatic food webs and manage Hg-impaired reservoirs. Both sulfide and dissolved organic matter (DOM) composition and concentration control Hg(II)i geochemistry and bioavailability for methylation [10, 11]; however, the influence of major biogeochemical cycles on the ability of the resident microbial community to produce MeHg (termed “Hg methylation capacity”) is a key knowledge gap [12]. MeHg production has been historically associated with sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) [3, 13], iron-reducing bacteria [14], and/or methanogens [15, 16]. This has led to MeHg mitigation strategies aimed at increasing the redox status of impacted systems, either via oxygenation [17] or addition of other TEAs higher on the redox ladder such as nitrate [18, 19] or manganese (Mn) [20, 21]. MeHg production is linked to biogeochemical cycles by microbes carrying the hgcAB gene cluster [22]; the discovery of this genetic marker has greatly expanded our understanding of the diversity of hgcA-carrying microbes [16, 23,24,25,26,27], including some aerobic or microaerobic organisms [25, 28, 29]. MeHg production has been observed in oxic environments [30,31,32,33] and is independent of methanogenesis and sulfate reduction under anoxic conditions at some sites [14, 34]. Presently, the relevance of putative “high-redox” Hg-methylating organisms to environmental MeHg production is not well understood.
In this study, we evaluated the underlying microbial and geochemical processes modulating MeHg formation in Brownlee Reservoir, a Hg-impaired hydroelectric reservoir within the Hells Canyon Complex (HCC) on the Snake River in Idaho, USA [35]. Over four years with contrasting hydrologic conditions, samples were collected with high spatial and temporal coverage to determine redox conditions and Hg concentration and speciation under various stages of thermal and redox stratification. Genome-resolved metagenomic sequencing was used to identify the taxonomy and metabolic capacity of hgcA-carrying (hgcA+) microbes. Overall, this study provides insight into the location and extent of MeHg production and identifies possible biogeochemical drivers of MeHg production in a reservoir system with dynamic hydrology and biogeochemistry. The data provide key information on MeHg formation that aids a larger project to develop comprehensive conceptual and quantitative models of Hg cycling in the river-reservoir system to aid management decisions [6, 7, 35,36,37].
Materials and methods
Site description and sampling
Brownlee Reservoir is the most upstream reservoir within the HCC, spans from river mile (RM) 345 (inflow) to RM284 (outflow through Brownlee Dam) [7, 38], and has a maximum depth of 91 m. The “transition zone” between the riverine and lacustrine zones stretches from the Brownlee Reservoir inflow to approximately RM308, depending on Snake River streamflow and reservoir water surface elevation [39, 40]. Biogeochemical profiles were collected at least monthly from the water column over the stratified period from 2016 to 2019 using trace-metal clean methods with either a Teflon sampling line and a peristaltic pump or an acid-washed Go-Flo sampler (General Oceanics, Miami, FL). Multiparameter sonde profiles were collected concurrent to water sampling. Samples for filter-passing Hg species and metals were collected up to one meter above the sediment:water interface (SWI) as follows. First, a shallow (~30 cm) sediment core was collected using an HTH sediment corer with a 1.5 m core barrel; then, acid-washed Teflon tubing was inserted into the overlying water and water samples were removed in 2–3 intervals, representing distinct layers of water above the SWI. Porewater samples were collected from the top 5 cm of sediment cores [41]. Sample collection protocols, analytical methods, and all physical and geochemical data are available in U.S. Geological Survey data releases [37, 41] and summarized in the Supporting Information and Table S1.
DNA extraction and sequencing
DNA samples for metagenomic sequencing were collected using 0.22 µm Sterivex filters in 2017, 2018, and 2019. Filters were removed from the cartridges and cells were lysed using physical and chemical lysis methods; then, DNA was extracted using phenol:chloroform and purified using isopropanol precipitation [26, 42]. Library preparation was performed in the Functional Genomics Laboratory and sequencing performed in the Vincent J. Coates Genomics Sequencing Laboratory (QB3, Berkeley, CA). Inserts approximately 600 bp in length were used to generate sequencing libraries with a Kapa Biosystem Library Prep kit (Roche Sequencing and Life Science, Kapa Biosystems, Wilmington, MA). 150 bp paired-end reads were generated on a NovaSeq or HiSeq 4000 (Illumina, San Diego, CA).
Metagenome assembly, binning, and annotation
Metagenomic metadata and read counts are in Table S2. Reads were trimmed and merged using fastp (v0.20.1) [43]. Metagenomes were clustered by kmer content and coassembled with metaSPADes (v3.14.1) [44]. Assembly statistics are shown in Table S3. Open reading frames (ORFs) were predicted using Prodigal (v2.6.3) [45] and bowtie2 (v2.6.3) was used for read mapping [46]. Gene and bin abundances were calculated as the average read coverage over each nucleotide, then normalized to the median read coverage of 16 ribosomal protein (rp16) genes in each metagenome [47]. Bins were generated with CONCOCT [48] and those containing an hgcA gene were manually curated in anvi’o (v6.2) [49]. Bins were grouped into metagenome operational taxonomic units (mOTUs) that shared 98% average nucleotide identity and 50% alignment. The mOTU taxonomies were estimated using GTDB-TK [50]. Metabolic genes were identified using Hidden Markov Models (HMMs) and confirmed phylogenetically (Table S4). Metabolic annotations of mOTUs were done using kofamscan [51], a custom HMM set with hmmer [52], METABOLIC [53], and FEET [54]. Major terminal electron-accepting process (TEAP) gene annotations were confirmed phylogenetically. Phylogenetic trees of mOTUs were based on rp16 gene alignments [47] and built with RAxML [55]. Raw metagenomes are available through NCBI (BioProject: PRJNA878929). HgcA sequences, hgcA sequences, and hgcA+ bins are available online at FigShare under project #158018.
hgcA identification and classification
HgcA amino acid sequences were identified in the assembly ORFs using a custom HMM [26], manually screened for the cap helix and transmembrane domains [22], and dereplicated using CD-HIT with a 97% identity cutoff [56]. HgcA sequences were aligned to references from Hg-MATE (v1.01142021) [57] with MUSCLE (v3.8.31) [58]. A maximum-likelihood tree was generated from this alignment using RAxML (v8.2.11) [55] and mid-point rooted with phangorn [59]. HgcA sequences were also classified using an established workflow [57, 60]. Using the autoclassification, HgcA phylogeny, and hgcA+ mOTU phylogeny, each hgcA gene was assigned a taxonomic classification. When possible, one of four predicted metabolic guilds was assigned to each hgcA gene: high-redox respiratory organism (HRRO), SRB, methanogen (MET) or fermentative (FERM). For details of metabolic assignment, see Table S5. Linear regression of MeHg to hgcA abundance was performed on log-log transformed data using the “lm” function in R (v4.1.3).
Results and discussion
Hydrologic and biogeochemical conditions
The hydrologic and biogeochemical conditions were evaluated at three sites spanning the lacustrine (RM286, RM300) and transition zone (RM310) of Brownlee Reservoir (Fig. 1a) [39, 40]. The lacustrine sites are divided by reservoir strata into the epilimnion, metalimnion, and hypolimnion based on temperature differences as done previously [39]. Parallel studies in Brownlee Reservoir documented processes influencing seasonal anoxia (defined here as oxygen <0.5 mg/L) [39], MeHg accumulation, Hg aqueous-particulate partitioning [6] and MeHg export [7, 36], which inform interpretations in this study. Brownlee Reservoir was thermally mixed and fully oxygenated during winter (Fig. 1b) prior to seasonal stratification from March/April to November/December. During spring, particulate material in the Snake River was mobilized by high flow conditions and transported downgradient towards Brownlee Reservoir. As flow velocities decreased in the transition zone of Brownlee Reservoir, the particulate material was deposited to the benthos [35, 61]. During the study period (2016–2019), interannual variability in the spring flow conditions of the Snake River entering Brownlee Reservoir (Fig. S1) influenced the location of the “deposition zone” of particulate material (Fig. 1b). Particulate deposition is interpreted to have driven heterotrophic microbial activity, which led to hypolimnetic anoxia (Fig. S2). Due to the variation in the location of the deposition zone, the initial site of anoxia varied year-to-year (Figs. S2, 1c). Over the summer stratified period, anoxia spread longitudinally up- and downgradient in Brownlee Reservoir (covering 30 river miles) and vertically in the water column (>40 m above the SWI; Fig. 1d). During fall, cooler inflowing water dove below warmer epilimnetic water; these interflow events eroded anoxic waters from the transition zone and metalimnion, resulting in sequential destratification (Fig. 1e) [6, 36]. During late fall and early winter, further cooling of the Snake River resulted in underflow and complete destratification and oxygenation of the hypolimnion of the reservoir [39].
Each year of the study, MeHg accumulated in the hypolimnion, metalimnion, and bottom waters of the transition zone (Fig. S3). MeHg concentrations in the epilimnion were rarely above 0.05 ng/L, despite previous evidence for MeHg production in oxic waters in Brownlee Reservoir [30]. There was notable interannual variation in the location of initial accumulation and maximum concentration of MeHg, which followed the initial onset of anoxia (Figs. S2, S3). However, in all sampling years, filter-passing MeHg accumulated in the hypolimnion at all sampled locations over the stratified period (Fig. S3). There was also consistent MeHg accumulation in the metalimnion, albeit to lower concentrations (Fig. S3). MeHg accumulation in the reservoir hypolimnion is interpreted to be heavily influenced by in-reservoir production for two reasons. First, MeHg concentrations entering Brownlee Reservoir and in the epilimnion during summer and fall were notably lower (Figs. S3, S4) than the reservoir hypolimnion. Second, particulate MeHg loading, which occurs in the spring before hypolimnetic MeHg accumulation [7], is expected to have little effect on filter-passing MeHg [62]. Conversely, unfiltered Hg(II)i at the inflow was relatively high, but filter-passing and particulate Hg(II)i within Brownlee Reservoir showed little change with depth (Figs. S5, S6), suggesting rapid Hg(II)i removal in the lacustrine zone, either through partitioning to particles and subsequent settling or conversion to MeHg [6]. Demethylation rates under dark conditions in Brownlee Reservoir are slow, further supporting methylation as the dominant control on MeHg concentrations [30]. Overall, we assert that in-reservoir production plays an important role in MeHg accumulation in the metalimnion and hypolimnion.
In-reservoir MeHg production could either occur in the water column, where the MeHg is observed, or in the sediments, which would require that the MeHg subsequently diffuses across the SWI into the hypolimnion. Sediment diffusion was evaluated as a potential in-reservoir source of MeHg by measuring MeHg depth profiles of the water immediately overlying (<1 m) the SWI and into the sediment porewater. Porewater MeHg levels were relatively high (1–4 ng/L), indicating that benthic MeHg production is likely. However, MeHg concentrations just above the SWI were comparable to or lower than hypolimnetic MeHg concentrations (Fig. 2, S7). If diffusion of MeHg across the SWI was responsible for elevated MeHg 40 m above the SWI, MeHg concentrations in the porewater and the water overlying the SWI should be far higher than the hypolimnetic water. While sediment diffusion is often cited as a source for hypolimnetic MeHg accumulation [63,64,65], studies that have investigated MeHg sources in lacustrine systems with an anoxic hypolimnion by looking in situ at water overlying the SWI all indicate that diffusion of sediment-derived MeHg is not a prominent source of MeHg to the hypolimnion [66,67,68,69]. Additionally, advective flux across the SWI has been shown in other systems to overwhelm diffusive flux of MeHg [70]; given the considerable hydraulic head in the lacustrine section of Brownlee Reservoir, it is likely that there is advective flux of water out of the bottom of the reservoir in the deep lacustrine parts of the reservoir, which could preclude sediment-derived MeHg from diffusing across the SWI. Taken together, our observations are inconsistent with a diffusive gradient of MeHg across the SWI and suggest a limited influence of benthic MeHg production on water column MeHg accumulation. Rather, we propose that in-reservoir water column Hg methylation is the dominant source of filter-passing MeHg, consistent with other freshwater lacustrine systems [26, 27, 66, 67, 71, 72].
MeHg accumulated throughout the reservoir under relatively high redox conditions (Figs. 2, S7). Biogeochemical TEAs are described below step-wise from high- to low-redox couple. In each year of the study, hypolimnetic nitrate concentrations progressively decreased over the reservoir stratification period (Fig. S8) concurrent with oxygen consumption (Fig. S2) and MeHg accumulation (Fig. S3). Of the 161 anoxic samples, only 15 exhibited nitrate <0.05 mgN/L. Samples where dissolved oxygen was <0.5 mg/L and nitrate >0.05 mgN/L are henceforth referred to as “oxygen-depleted”, while samples where nitrate <0.05 mgN/L will be referred to as “nitrate-depleted”. In 2016, nitrate depletion was not observed; in all other study years, nitrate depletion was only observed at the bottom of the hypolimnion in late summer, well after MeHg had started to accumulate (Figs. S8, S3). Each year, filter-passing Mn accumulated in the hypolimnion over the reservoir stratification period (maximum = 1.6 mg/L; Fig. S9). However, particulate Mn in the water column was low, rarely above 0.2 mg/L (Fig. S10), which suggests that filter-passing Mn originated from rapid reductive dissolution of Mn(III/IV)-oxides on settling particles [68]. There was no evidence of Fe(III) reduction to Fe(II) in the water column, as filter-passing Fe below the epilimnion was once up to 0.061 mg/L, but otherwise remained under 0.025 mg/L (Figs. S11, S12). Sulfate concentrations were relatively high in the reservoir (~20–60 mg/L), but depth profiles showed no sign of significant sulfate consumption (Fig. S13). Inorganic sulfide, the product of dissimilatory sulfate reduction, was only detected in four samples across the four years of this study, twice at RM286 in 2017 and once each at RM300 and RM310 in 2018 (Table S1). Sulfide was not detected in any samples where nitrate >0.05 mgN/L. Further, thiosulfate, produced by incomplete dissimilatory sulfate reduction or inorganic sulfide oxidation [73], was at or less than the daily detection limit (0.008–0.05 mg/L) in all 135 samples where it was measured except for two samples where sulfide was present and/or nitrate was completely depleted (Table S1). Taken together, the geochemical data suggest that denitrification is the dominant TEAP in the oxygen-depleted regions of Brownlee Reservoir during stratification and MeHg accumulation.
Each sample location was assigned a redox status based on the water chemistry of the redox-active constituents (Table S1); MeHg concentrations were then grouped by redox status (Fig. 3). MeHg was consistently low when dissolved oxygen was >0.5 mg/L (maximum = 0.21 ng/L; mean = 0.05 ± 0.03; n = 215). Although MeHg concentrations were highest under nitrate depletion/sulfide accumulation conditions (n = 11 in total), samples with detectable nitrate still showed appreciable MeHg accumulation (maximum = 1.95 ng/L; mean = 0.47 ± 0.47 ng/L; n = 107). We then investigated potential factors controlling MeHg production in Brownlee Reservoir. MeHg did not correlate with either DOC concentration (p = 0.156; Fig. S14a) or DOM SUVA254 (p = 0.264; Fig. S14b), and sulfide was not detected in most samples. As DOM character and concentration and sulfide concentration are the primary determinants of Hg(II)i bioavailability [10, 11, 74, 75], we interpret these observations to indicate that Hg(II)i bioavailability does not change significantly across the reservoir, and is thus unlikely to explain the trends in MeHg we observed. Overall, MeHg concentrations were correlated to the number of days since dissolved oxygen dropped below 0.5 mg/L (“days of anoxia”) in individual water samples (adjusted R2 = 0.32; p < 0.001), a correlation that improved by including year of sampling as a blocking factor (adjusted R2 = 0.43; p < 0.001; Fig. S15). Together, this suggests that MeHg concentrations are governed by on-going microbial Hg methylation activity in anoxic water.
Microbial metabolic potential
Assembled shotgun metagenomes (Tables S2, S3) from the water column of Brownlee Reservoir were searched for metabolic genes to confirm the presence of TEAPs suggested by the geochemical data. Gene abundance was normalized to the median abundance of 16 universally conserved single-copy genes [47]; thus, the normalized gene abundance is presented as a percentage of the total microbial community. The abundance of other identified genes is provided in Table S4. Nitrate reductase genes (narGHI) were present at low levels (~ 10% of the microbial community) in oxygenated waters (Fig. S16; only narG is shown). Under oxygen-depleted conditions, narG increased in abundance, up to 50–60% at some depths, coincident with decreasing nitrate levels and increases in MeHg concentrations (Figs. S16, 2). Under sulfidic conditions at the bottom of RM286 in 2017, the abundance of narG decreased again. The genes enabling Mn-reduction via external electron transfer (EET) are highly diverse and poorly constrained [54, 76], making it difficult to use metagenomics to identify potential Mn reduction hotspots. However, homologs of extE, which is involved in Mn-reduction [77], were most abundant at 50 m at RM300 in 2019, coincident with a peak in filter-passing Mn (Table S4). These and other EET genes found in Geobacter were not present in the metagenomes from fall 2017 and 2018, but this does not rule out the presence of other Mn-reducing genes. We also searched for reductive dsrA and dsrD genes as markers for sulfate reduction (dsrA is shown in Fig. S16). In 2017, dsrA was present up to 4% in the deep hypolimnion at RM286, coincident with the detection of sulfide, but only to 0.5% at RM300, where nitrate was depleted but sulfide had not yet accumulated (Figs. S16, 2). In 2018, dsrA was most abundant (0.6%) under sulfidic conditions (RM300 at 47 m), but also present under nitrate-depleted conditions (0.2%). When nitrate was above detection, dsrA was low abundance (< 0.1%) except once (RM300 at 47 m in 2017), when nitrate was only 0.18 mgN/L and dsrA had an abundance of 0.27%. Thus, agreement was observed between dsrA abundance and geochemical indicators of dissimilatory sulfate reduction (sulfide, thiosulfate). Methanogenic-associated mcrA genes were only detected in 2017 and mostly found under sulfidic conditions (e.g., up to 2% abundance at the bottom of RM286) (Fig. S16). Overall, methanogenesis does not appear to be a prominent process occurring in the water column. These functional gene analyses (1) confirm that nitrate reduction was likely the dominant TEAP under anoxic conditions throughout Brownlee Reservoir across all study years and (2) provide modest evidence of dissimilatory sulfate reduction under nitrate-depleted conditions, when geochemical indicators of sulfate reduction were not yet detected.
hgcA abundance
Assembled metagenomes were then searched for the hgcA gene and 26 unique hgcA genes were identified (Table S5). Total hgcA abundance was low in oxic waters (maximum = 0.09%; mean = 0.03 ± 0.02%; n = 7) and higher under oxygen-depleted conditions (maximum = 0.80%; mean = 0.23 ± 0.26%; n = 17; Fig. 4a). Total hgcA abundance was notably higher under sulfidic conditions (maximum = 9.4%; mean = 4.6 ± 4.3%; n = 3) than nitrate-depleted/non-sulfidic conditions (maximum = 1.1%; mean = 0.7 ± 0.6%; n = 3; Fig. 4a), despite comparable MeHg levels (Fig. 3). While direct comparisons of gene abundances across studies can be difficult due to different normalization methods, the relative abundance of hgcA under sulfidic conditions is comparable to that observed elsewhere in sulfidic lakes [26, 27] or highly reduced peat sediments [75], while hgcA abundance under nitrate-reducing conditions in Brownlee Reservoir is more comparable to that observed in marine waters [29, 78]. Across all years, there was a significant linear correlation (p < 0.001, R2 = 0.43) between hgcA abundance and filter-passing MeHg concentrations (Fig. 4b). While such a correlation seems intuitive, this relationship has not been observed in many environments, possibly due to factors such as changes in Hg(II)i bioavailability, MeHg sinks (e.g., biotic or abiotic demethylation), or differences in transcription, translation, or protein activity of hgcA [78,79,80,81,82,83,84]. The outliers highlighted in Fig. 4b likely represent locations where these other factors substantially influence MeHg accumulation. Samples with more MeHg than expected based on hgcA abundance (above the regression line) may have had additional sources of MeHg (e.g., interflow transport of MeHg), while those with less MeHg than expected (below the regression line) may have been strongly influenced by a MeHg sink (e.g., demethylation) or located at a redox transition where MeHg concentrations are expected to lag behind hgcA abundance. Generally, the nitrate-depleted/sulfidic samples were above the regression line, possibly indicating that hgcA-containing organisms at this site were more efficient MeHg-producers, which is consistent with the observation in cultures that SRBs are particularly effective methylators [23]. Overall, the correlation between MeHg concentration and hgcA abundance in Brownlee Reservoir is consistent with geochemical profiles in suggesting water column Hg methylation as the primary source of MeHg. While this study used gene abundance rather than gene transcripts or protein abundance, the results are consistent with other studies that have shown a direct correlation between hgcA gene abundance and microbial Hg methylation by accounting for [85, 86] or controlling [75] the effects of Hg(II)i bioavailability. In this river-reservoir system, the absence of strong geochemical gradients controlling Hg(II)i bioavailability across the system (e.g., DOM chemistry, sulfide) suggest that MeHg production is primarily controlled by microbial Hg methylation capacity, here represented by the abundance of the hgcA gene.
Metabolic capacity of Hg-methylating organisms
We generated metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) carrying hgcA (hgcA+) and predicted their metabolic capacity based on their gene content. We grouped these MAGs into ten unique, medium-quality (completeness>50%, redundancy<10% [87]) bacterial mOTUs. We assigned each mOTU to one of three functional guilds: obligately fermentative bacteria (FERM), high-redox respiratory organism (HRRO), or SRB. A brief description of each group follows and complete analyses of each mOTU are in the Supporting Information and Table S6.
Fermentative bacteria
The most common hgcA+ mOTUs across all redox conditions were designated as FERM, as indicated by the lack of terminal oxidases, electron transport chains, or other genes indicative of respiration. Five FERM mOTUs were phylum Verrucomicrobiota, four from class Kiritimatiellae and one from class Lentisphaeria (Fig. 5a, S17; Table S6). The Kiritimatiellae mOTUs from different years are phylogenetically distinct, but both cluster with hgcA+ mOTUs from the anoxic hypolimnion of a eutrophic freshwater lake [26] (Fig. 5a). Three of them were adapted to degrading polysaccharides, containing between 85 and 240 glycoside hydrolases (GHs; Table S6). They were most abundant in sulfidic waters (Fig. 5b, c). Eight additional Kiritimatiellae mOTUs without hgcA were closely related to the hgcA+ mOTUs (Fig. 5a) and showed similar abundance patterns (Fig. 5b, c). The Lentisphaeria mOTU with hgcA was most abundant in the upper hypolimnion at RM286 when nitrate levels were ~0.6 mg/L (Fig. 5d). This mOTU encoded an anaerobic sulfite reductase homolog and a cydAB terminal oxidase that could detoxify oxidants such as nitrite, sulfite, or oxygen [88], without gaining energy through respiration. Kiritimatiellae and Lentisphaeria organisms carrying hgcA are not confirmed Hg-methylators, but have now been shown to be abundant in several different aquatic ecosystems [26, 27, 86, 89]. An mOTU representing an obligately fermentative, polysaccharide-degrading Firmicutes organism was also retrieved from 2017 (Table S6).
High-redox respiratory organisms
Two bacterial mOTUs were recovered that were predicted to be high-redox respiratory organisms (HRROs), capable of respiration using nitrate, Mn, or other unknown TEAs. One was classified into the Prolixibacteraceae family within the Bacteroidales order and designated HCC_PROLIX_006 (Fig. 6a). Six closely related medium-quality mOTUs without the hgcA gene were recovered (Fig. 6a). Of the 134 genomes and mOTUs in NCBI’s GenBank and RefSeq databases annotated as Prolixibacteraceae, only seven contained hgcA, none of which have been cultured (Figs. S18, 6b). The Prolixibacteraceae hgcAB gene pairs were co-located with several arsenic cycling genes, as observed in other hgcA+ organisms [25, 90, 91], which suggests a possible link between the biogeochemical cycling of these two elements. HCC_PROLIX_006 was recovered from the 2018 metagenomes and was most abundant in the metalimnion where MeHg was at a local maximum and nitrate was at a local minimum (Fig. 6c), suggesting that the organism was adapted to oxygen-depleted conditions. Correspondingly, HCC_PROLIX_006 contained a membrane-bound nitrate reductase and a full electron transport chain but lacked the genes for complete denitrification, instead carrying a narK gene encoding a nitrate importer/nitrite exporter (Fig. 6d). HCC_PROLIX_006 also encoded several possible pathways for EET, which could support Mn reduction. The mOTU also contained 248 glucoside hydrolyzes and complete central carbon metabolism pathways, suggesting that the organism can hydrolyze large polymeric carbohydrates and completely oxidize the resulting monomers. Bacteroidetes mOTUs carrying hgcA, closely related to HCC_PROLIX_006 but lacking narG, were present throughout the anoxic hypolimnion of a eutrophic lake [26]. Nitrate reduction genes have been identified in hgcA+ mOTUs [26, 29] but have not been directly implicated in MeHg production.
The second HRRO mOTU (designated HCC_PELOB_005) was classified as Pelobacteraceae, which is closely related to Geobacteraceae (Fig. S19a). HCC_PELOB_005 contained several genes encoding pathways for EET, including extE [77] and both imcH and cbcL, which facilitate EET to high- and low-redox TEAPs, respectively (Fig. S19b) [92]. HCC_PELOB_005 was most abundant at 50 m at RM300 in 2019 (Table S6). While particulate Mn was low at that site, filter-passing Mn was present. Mn oxides can cycle quickly at steep oxic gradients [68, 93], suggesting a possible cryptic Mn cycle linked to MeHg production. An hgcA+ Pelobacteraceae mOTU metabolically and phylogenetically similar to HCC_PELOB_005 was identified in a freshwater lake at the oxic-anoxic interface where Mn reduction was suspected (GEO_0030 in Fig. S19) [26]. While Mn respiration has not been shown to drive MeHg production, Fe-reducing Geobacter, closely related to Pelobacteraceae, are also capable of reducing Mn [92]; are known to be efficient Hg-methylators [23, 94]; and have been implicated in MeHg production in rice paddies [82] and lake sediments [95].
Sulfate-reducing Hg-methylators
We also recovered four mOTUs representing SRB. Three were classified in the Desulfobacterales order. These mOTUs each had at least partial reductive dsr operons and an electron transport chain. In 2017, these mOTUs were only present when sulfide was detected in the water column (Fig. S20). The fourth potential SRB mOTU was associated with the Smithellaceae family and recovered from 2019 metagenomes. While this mOTU contained dsrABD, it lacked other key genes for sulfate reduction and was detected at 50 and 56 m at RM300, despite concentrations of 1.4 mgN/L nitrate present, suggesting the mOTU may not be a true SRB. This lack of a complete sulfate-reducing pathway has been previously reported [96] and is consistent with previous work suggesting that Smithellaceae are primarily fermentative and occasionally syntrophic [97].
Biogeochemical drivers of microbial Hg methylation
To understand the relative contribution of different microbial guilds to the total hgcA population, each of the 26 metagenomic hgcA sequences was assigned a functional guild, either one that was used for the mOTUs (FERM, HRRO, or SRB) or methanogens (MET), which forms a distinct phylogenetic group with Chloroflexi within the HgcA phylogeny [25] (Table S5; Fig. S21). Sequences that could not be assigned a functional guild were designated unknown (UNK). In anoxic water with nitrate >0.05 mg/L, FERM were the dominant hgcA-containing microbes (> 60% of the total hgcA abundance) (Fig. 7a). HRROs with hgcA were low in abundance in most oxygen-depleted samples; however, at three such sites, hgcA+ HRROs were highly abundant, mostly represented by the two HRRO mOTUs described above (Fig. 7a). Nitrate-depleted conditions, regardless of sulfide presence, were dominated by FERM and SRB-associated hgcA sequences (Fig. 7b, c). MET-associated hgcA sequences were rare throughout the reservoir. A nonmetric multidimensional scaling ordination based on Bray-Curtis dissimilarity confirmed that the hgcA+ microbial communities under nitrate-depleted but non-sulfidic conditions were similar to those under sulfidic conditions, while the hgcA+ microbial community from oxygen-depleted samples was distinct (Fig. 7d).
The wide range of metabolic functions associated with hgcA+ microbes in Brownlee Reservoir points to a conceptual model in which multiple biogeochemical cycles influence microbial MeHg production capacity rather than just one or two (Fig. 8). The relative contribution of hgcA+ organisms from different metabolic guilds to overall MeHg production is unknown. Environmental metatranscriptomic studies show different hgcA expression levels from different microbial guilds [25, 98] and laboratory studies show variable MeHg production rates between hgcA+ microorganisms [16, 23, 99]. This reinforces the need to pair hgcA gene abundance data with relevant geochemical analysis to identify potential biogeochemical drivers and to interpret that data carefully. Here, paired water chemistry and metagenomic data support that microbial nitrate reduction is far more likely than sulfate reduction to fuel most MeHg production (Fig. 8). This is of particular concern in Brownlee Reservoir, where long-term monitoring identified a nearly two-fold increase in inflowing nitrate concentrations from 1995 to 2021 [39]. However, the predominance of fermentative hgcA+ organisms (Fig. 7) and the correlation between MeHg and days of anoxia (Fig. S15) also points to overall carbon metabolism under anoxic conditions as a major driver of microbial MeHg production, a link previously documented in lacustrine water columns [67] and wetland periphyton [100]. Most of the organic carbon in this system is autochthonous cyanobacterial or algal biomass produced within the Snake River and/or Brownlee Reservoir [6], driven by large nitrogen and phosphorus inputs from agricultural runoff [101] (Fig. 8). Under the nitrate-replete conditions common throughout Brownlee Reservoir, particulate organic matter can be hydrolyzed and fermented by obligately fermentative organisms that provide simplified organic acids to HRROs for oxidation through nitrate- or Mn/Fe-reduction; alternatively, it can be hydrolyzed and oxidized solely by HRROs with complete central carbon metabolism pathways. In the small pockets of sulfidic water, SRBs rely on fermentative organisms to provide them with small organic acids or monomeric compounds [102]. Microbial community metabolism is often limited by the initial hydrolysis of complex organic carbon molecules [103], so regardless of the functional guild producing MeHg, the supply and catabolism of labile carbon is likely the limiting factor for microbial Hg-methylation activity. This suggests that more than any given TEAP, overall carbon metabolism and polymeric hydrolysis under anoxic conditions is the primary biogeochemical process linked to microbial Hg-methylation activity. If so, the Snake River-Hells Canyon Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) aimed at reducing algae levels and improving DO conditions, if successful, has the potential to reduce internal MeHg loading in Brownlee Reservoir [39, 104]. While the tools to directly quantify the contribution of various functional groups to MeHg production do not exist at this time, the functional diversity of hgcA+ organisms and the possible link to overall metabolism suggest that quantifying the relationship between microbial Hg-methylation activity and metabolic processes and confirming the rate-limiting steps of microbial metabolism (i.e., polymer hydrolysis vs. TEAP rates) will provide insight into the dominant biogeochemical factors driving MeHg production.
Environmental implications
Reservoirs are dynamic systems that can have significant impacts on Hg accumulation in aquatic food webs within and downstream of impounded waters [5, 9]. In Brownlee Reservoir, hydrologic conditions determined the location of the deposition zone and subsequent progression of anoxia and redox changes. Interannual differences in river-reservoir hydrology had cascading effects on the water chemistry, progression of TEAPs, and abundance and metabolic potential of Hg-methylating organisms, all of which ultimately modulated differences in MeHg concentrations in Brownlee Reservoir. The observed variation in location of MeHg production is likely to translate to spatial differences in MeHg bioaccumulation in the food web and temporal differences in MeHg mixing into the interflow and subsequent export through the dam [8, 36]. Understanding the coupled hydrologic and biogeochemical drivers of Hg methylation is important to developing management strategies to limit MeHg formation and bioaccumulation. The assumption that MeHg production is primarily mediated by SRB and methanogens has led to efforts to reduce MeHg contamination of aquatic food webs by hypolimnetic nitrate amendment [18] or Mn oxides [20, 21] as a cost-effective alternative to hypolimnetic oxygenation [17]. However, the results presented here suggest that MeHg production can occur under denitrifying or Mn-reducing conditions by HRROs or their fermentative partners. Thus, while hypolimnetic amendments have been effective in some systems [18, 20, 21], caution should be used in deploying these strategies. Comprehensive studies and/or trial experiments identifying potential microbial factors linking organic carbon metabolism and TEA concentrations to MeHg production are critical to verify the efficacy of chemical amendments on MeHg production [20]. The deployment of robust experimental designs and new ecophysiology methods will permit the investigation of diverse microbial functional guilds and their contribution to MeHg production as a function of major biogeochemical cycles and net productivity of waterbodies; this will subsequently permit targeted management strategies to mitigate MeHg uptake in aquatic food webs and the risk of Hg to humans.
Data availability
The water chemistry data analyzed in the current study are available as a U.S. Geological Survey data release (https://doi.org/10.5066/P9DT2B6J). Raw metagenomic sequencing data are stored in the NCBI database under BioProject PRJNA878929. Processed sequencing data, including HgcA amino acid sequences, hgcA gene sequences, and genomic bins containing the hgcA gene are available online at FigShare under project #158018. Code used to generate figures and analyze data is available on Github (https://github.com/petersonben50/HellsCanyon).
References
Friedl G, Wüest A. Disrupting biogeochemical cycles – consequences of damming. Aquat Sci. 2002;64:55–65.
Brigham ME, Krabbenhoft DP, Olson ML, DeWild JF. Methylmercury in flood-control impoundments and natural waters of northwestern Minnesota, 1997–99. Water, Air, Soil Pollut. 2002;138:61–78.
Compeau GC, Bartha R. Sulfate-reducing bacteria: principal methylators of mercury in anoxic estuarine sediment. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1985;50:498–502.
Bodaly RA, St. Louis VL, Paterson MJ, Fudge RJP, Hall BD, Rosenberg DM, et al. Bioaccumulation of mercury in the aquatic food chain in newly flooded areas. Metal ions in biological systems: Volume 34: Mercury and its effects on environment and biology. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker; 1997. pp 259-88.
Willacker JJ, Eagles-Smith CA, Lutz MA, Tate MT, Lepak JM, Ackerman JT. Reservoirs and water management influence fish mercury concentrations in the western United States and Canada. Sci Total Environ. 2016;568:739–48.
Poulin BA, Tate MT, Ogorek J, Breitmeyer SE, Baldwin AK, Yoder AM, et al. Biogeochemical and hydrologic synergy control mercury fate in an arid land river-reservoir system. Environ Sci: Process Impacts. 2023;25:912–28.
Baldwin AK, Poulin BA, Naymik J, Hoovestol C, Clark GM, Krabbenhoft DP. Seasonal dynamics and interannual variability in mercury concentrations and loads through a three-reservoir complex. Environ Sci Technol. 2020;54:9305–14.
Canavan CM, Caldwell CA, Bloom NS. Discharge of methylmercury-enriched hypolimnetic water from a stratified reservoir. Sci Total Environ. 2000;260:159–70.
Kasper D, Fernandes E, Palermo A, Branco CWC, Malm O. Evidence of elevated mercury levels in carnivorous and omnivorous fishes downstream from an amazon reservoir. Hydrobiologia. 2012;694:87–98.
Graham AM, Aiken GR, Gilmour CC. Effect of dissolved organic matter source and character on microbial Hg methylation in Hg–S–DOM solutions. Environ Sci Technol. 2013;47:5746–54.
Poulin BA, Gerbig CA, Kim CS, Stegemeier JP, Ryan JN, Aiken GR. Effects of sulfide concentration and dissolved organic matter characteristics on the structure of nanocolloidal metacinnabar. Environ Sci Technol. 2017;51:13133–42.
Bravo AG, Cosio C. Biotic formation of methylmercury: a bio–physico–chemical conundrum. Limnol Oceanogr. 2020;65:1010–27.
Gilmour CC, Henry EA, Mitchell R. Sulfate stimulation of mercury methylation in freshwater sediments. Environ Sci Technol. 1992;26:2281–7.
Fleming EJ, Mack EE, Green PG, Nelson DC. Mercury methylation from unexpected sources: molybdate-inhibited freshwater sediments and an iron-reducing bacterium. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006;72:457–64.
Hamelin S, Amyot M, Barkay T, Wang Y, Planas D. Methanogens: principal methylators of mercury in lake periphyton. Environ Sci Technol. 2011;45:7693–7700.
Gilmour CC, Bullock AL, McBurney A, Podar M, Elias DA. Robust mercury methylation across diverse methanogenic Archaea. MBio. 2018;9:e02403–17.
Dent SR, Beutel MW, Gantzer P, Moore BC. Response of methylmercury, total mercury, iron and manganese to oxygenation of an anoxic hypolimnion in North Twin Lake, Washington. Lake Reserv Manag. 2014;30:119–30.
Matthews DA, Babcock DB, Nolan JG, Prestigiacomo AR, Effler SW, Driscoll CT, et al. Whole-lake nitrate addition for control of methylmercury in mercury-contaminated Onondaga Lake, NY. Environ Res. 2013;125:52–60.
Todorova SG, Driscoll CT, Matthews DA, Effler SW, Hines ME, Henry EA. Evidence for regulation of monomethyl mercury by nitrate in a seasonally stratified, eutrophic lake. Environ Sci Technol. 2009;43:6572–8.
Seelos M, Meraz ER, Beutel M, Traina SJ, Furhmann B, Burmistrova J, et al. Evaluation of manganese oxide amendments for mercury remediation in contaminated aquatic sediments. ACS EST Eng. 2021;1:1688–97.
Vlassopoulos D, Kanematsu M, Henry EA, Goin J, Leven A, Glaser D, et al. Manganese(IV) oxide amendments reduce methylmercury concentrations in sediment porewater. Environ Sci: Process Impacts. 2018;20:1746–60.
Parks JM, Johs A, Podar M, Bridou R, Hurt RA, Smith SD, et al. The genetic basis for bacterial mercury methylation. Science. 2013;339:1332–5.
Gilmour CC, Podar M, Bullock AL, Graham AM, Brown SD, Somenahally AC, et al. Mercury methylation by novel microorganisms from new environments. Environ Sci Technol. 2013;47:11810–20.
Podar M, Gilmour CC, Brandt CC, Soren A, Brown SD, Crable BR, et al. Global prevalence and distribution of genes and microorganisms involved in mercury methylation. Sci Adv. 2015;1:e1500675.
McDaniel EA, Peterson BD, Stevens SLR, Tran PQ, Anantharaman K, McMahon KD. Expanded phylogenetic diversity and metabolic flexibility of mercury-methylating microorganisms. MSystems. 2020;5:e00299–20.
Peterson BD, McDaniel EA, Schmidt AG, Lepak RF, Janssen SE, Tran PQ, et al. Mercury methylation genes identified across diverse anaerobic microbial guilds in a eutrophic sulfate-enriched lake. Environ Sci Technol. 2020;54:15840–51.
Jones DS, Walker GM, Johnson NW, Mitchell CPJ, Coleman Wasik JK, Bailey JV. Molecular evidence for novel mercury methylating microorganisms in sulfate-impacted lakes. ISME J. 2019;13:1659–75.
Gionfriddo CM, Tate MT, Wick RR, Schultz MB, Zemla A, Thelen MP, et al. Microbial mercury methylation in Antarctic sea ice. Nat Microbiol. 2016;1:16127.
Lin H, Ascher DB, Myung Y, Lamborg CH, Hallam SJ, Gionfriddo CM, et al. Mercury methylation by metabolically versatile and cosmopolitan marine bacteria. ISME J. 2021;15:1810–25.
Eckley CS, Luxton TP, Knightes CD, Shah V. Methylmercury production and degradation under light and dark conditions in the water column of the Hells Canyon Reservoirs, USA. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2021;40:1827–37.
Gallorini A, Loizeau J-L. Mercury methylation in oxic aquatic macro-environments: a review. J Limnol. 2021;80:2007.
Gallorini A, Loizeau J-L. Lake snow as a mercury methylation micro-environment in the oxic water column of a deep peri-alpine lake. Chemosphere. 2022;299:134306.
Gascón Díez E, Loizeau J-L, Cosio C, Bouchet S, Adatte T, Amouroux D, et al. Role of settling particles on mercury methylation in the oxic water column of freshwater systems. Environ Sci Technol. 2016;50:11672–9.
Schaefer JK, Kronberg R, Björn E, Skyllberg U. Anaerobic guilds responsible for mercury methylation in boreal wetlands of varied trophic status serving as either a methylmercury source or sink. Environ Microbiol. 2020;22:3685–99.
Clark GM, Naymik J, Krabbenhoft DP, Eagles-Smith CA, Aiken GR, Marvin-DiPasquale MC, et al. Mercury cycling in the Hells Canyon Complex of the Snake River, Idaho and Oregon. Boise, ID: U.S. Geological Survey Fact Sheet; 2016. 2016–3051.
Baldwin AK, Eagles-Smith CA, Willacker JJ, Poulin BA, Krabbenhoft DP, Naymik J, et al. In-reservoir physical processes modulate aqueous and biological methylmercury export from a seasonally anoxic reservoir. Environ Sci Technol. 2022;56:13751–60.
Poulin BA, Breitmeyer SE, Krabbenhoft DP, Tate MT, DeWild JF, Ogorek JM, et al. Chemical characterization of water and suspended sediment of the Snake River and Hells Canyon Complex (Idaho, Oregon) (ver. 2.0, November 2022). Boulder, CO: U.S. Geological Survey Data Release; 2022.
Myers R, Harrison J, Parkinson SK, Hoelscher B, Naymik J, Parkinson SE Pollutant transport and processing in the Hells Canyon Complex. 2003. Technical appendices for new license application: Hells Canyon Hydroelectric Project: Technical Report Appendix E.2.2-2.
Naymik J, Larsen CA, Myers R, Hoovestol C, Gastelecutto N, Bates D. Long-term trends in inflowing chlorophyll a and nutrients and their relation to dissolved oxygen in a large western reservoir. Lake Reserv Manag. 2023;39:53–71.
Thornton KW. Perspectives on reservoir limnology. Reservoir Limnology: Ecological Perspectives. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 1990. pp 1–13.
Marvin-DiPasquale M, Agee JL, Kakouros E, Kieu LH, Arias MR, Baesman SM, et al. Biogeochemical data for mercury and other constituents in surface sediment and deep cores from the Hells Canyon Reservoir Complex, Idaho and Oregon 2014-2018. Menlo Park, CA: U.S. Geological Survey Data Release; 2020.
Lever MA, Torti A, Eickenbusch P, Michaud AB, Šantl-Temkiv T, Jørgensen BB. A modular method for the extraction of DNA and RNA, and the separation of DNA pools from diverse environmental sample types. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:476.
Chen S, Zhou Y, Chen Y, Gu J. fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics. 2018;34:i884–i890.
Nurk S, Meleshko D, Korobeynikov A, Pevzner PA. metaSPAdes: a new versatile metagenomic assembler. Genome Res. 2017;27:824–34.
Hyatt D, Chen G-L, LoCascio PF, Land ML, Larimer FW, Hauser LJ. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinforma. 2010;11:119.
Langmead B, Salzberg SL. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods. 2012;9:357–9.
Sorek R, Zhu Y, Creevey CJ, Francino MP, Bork P, Rubin EM. Genome-wide experimental determination of barriers to horizontal gene transfer. Science. 2007;318:1449–52.
Alneberg J, Bjarnason BS, de Bruijn I, Schirmer M, Quick J, Ijaz UZ, et al. Binning metagenomic contigs by coverage and composition. Nat Methods. 2014;11:1144–6.
Eren AM, Esen ÖC, Quince C, Vineis JH, Morrison HG, Sogin ML, et al. Anvi’o: an advanced analysis and visualization platform for ‘omics data. PeerJ. 2015;3:e1319.
Chaumeil P-A, Mussig AJ, Hugenholtz P, Parks DH. GTDB-Tk: a toolkit to classify genomes with the genome taxonomy database. Bioinformatics. 2019;36:1925–7.
Aramaki T, Blanc-Mathieu R, Endo H, Ohkubo K, Kanehisa M, Goto S, et al. KofamKOALA: KEGG Ortholog assignment based on profile HMM and adaptive score threshold. Bioinformatics. 2020;36:2251–2.
Eddy SR. Accelerated profile HMM searches. PLoS Comput Biol. 2011;7:e1002195.
Zhou Z, Tran PQ, Breister AM, Liu Y, Kieft K, Cowley ES, et al. METABOLIC: high-throughput profiling of microbial genomes for functional traits, metabolism, biogeochemistry, and community-scale functional networks. Microbiome. 2022;10:33.
Olmsted CN, Ort R, Tran PQ, McDaniel EA, Roden EE, Bond DR, et al. Environmental predictors of electroactive bacterioplankton in small boreal lakes. Environ Microbiol. 2022;25:705–20.
Stamatakis A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:1312–3.
Fu L, Niu B, Zhu Z, Wu S, Li W. CD-HIT: accelerated for clustering the next-generation sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2012;28:3150–2.
Gionfriddo CM, Capo E, Peterson BD, Heyu L, Jones DS, Bravo AG, et al. Hg-MATE-Db.v1.01142021. 2021.
Edgar RC. MUSCLE: a multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity. BMC Bioinforma. 2004;5:113.
Schliep KP. phangorn: phylogenetic analysis in R. Bioinformatics. 2011;27:592–3.
Gionfriddo CM, Wymore AM, Jones DS, Wilpiszeski RL, Lynes MM, Christensen GA, et al. An improved hgcAB primer set and direct high-throughput sequencing expand Hg-methylator diversity in nature. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:541554.
Ebel WJ, Koski CH. Physical and chemical limnology of Brownlee reservoir, 1962-64. Fish Bull. 1968;67:295–335.
Heyes A, Miller C, Mason RP. Mercury and methylmercury in Hudson river sediment: impact of tidal resuspension on partitioning and methylation. Mar Chem. 2004;90:75–89.
Beck BF, Johnson NW. Geochemical factors influencing the production and transport of methylmercury in St. Louis River Estuary sediment. Appl Geochem. 2014;51:44–54.
Choe K-Y, Gill GA, Lehman RD, Han S, Heim WA, Coale KH. Sediment-water exchange of total mercury and monomethyl mercury in the San Francisco Bay-Delta. Limnol Oceanogr. 2004;49:1512–27.
Gill GA, Bloom NS, Cappellino S, Driscoll CT, Dobbs C, McShea L, et al. Sediment−water fluxes of mercury in Lavaca Bay, Texas. Environ Sci Technol. 1999;33:663–9.
Eckley CS, Watras CJ, Hintelmann H, Morrison K, Kent AD, Regnell O. Mercury methylation in the hypolimnetic waters of lakes with and without connection to wetlands in northern Wisconsin. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 2005;62:400–11.
Watras CJ, Bloom NS, Claas SA, Morrison KA, Gilmour CC, Craig SR. Methylmercury production in the anoxic hypolimnion of a dimictic seepage lake. Water, Air, Soil Pollut. 1995;80:735–45.
Chadwick SP, Babiarz CL, Hurley JP, Armstrong DE. Influences of iron, manganese, and dissolved organic carbon on the hypolimnetic cycling of amended mercury. Sci Total Environ. 2006;368:177–88.
Watras CJ, Bloom, NS .The vertical distribution of mercury species in Wisconsin lakes: Accumulation in plankton layers. Mercury pollution: integration and synthesis. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 1994. pp 137–51.
Krabbenhoft DP, Gilmour CC, Benoit JM, Babiarz CL, Andren AW, Hurley JP. Methyl mercury dynamics in littoral sediments of a temperate seepage lake. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 1998;55:835–44.
Lepak RF, Janssen SE, Yin R, Krabbenhoft DP, Ogorek JM, DeWild JF, et al. Factors affecting mercury stable isotopic distribution in piscivorous fish of the Laurentian Great Lakes. Environ Sci Technol. 2018;52:2768–76.
Eckley CS, Hintelmann H. Determination of mercury methylation potentials in the water column of lakes across Canada. Sci Total Environ. 2006;368:111–25.
Zopfi J, Ferdelman TG, Fossing H. Sulfur biogeochemistry - past and present. Distribution and fate of sulfur intermediates - sulfite, tetrathionate, thiosulfate, and elemental sulfur - in marine sediments. Geological Society of America, Boulder, Colorado, pp 97–116.
Graham AM, Aiken GR, Gilmour CC. Dissolved organic matter enhances microbial mercury methylation under sulfidic conditions. Environ Sci Technol. 2012;46:2715–23.
Peterson BD, Krabbenhoft DP, McMahon KD, Ogorek JM, Tate MT, Orem WH, et al. Environmental formation of methylmercury is controlled by synergy of inorganic mercury bioavailability and microbial mercury‐methylation capacity. Environ Microbiol. 2023;1462–2912.
Lovley DR, Holmes DE. Electromicrobiology: the ecophysiology of phylogenetically diverse electroactive microorganisms. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2022;20:5–19.
Jiménez Otero F, Chan CH, Bond DR. Identification of different putative outer membrane electron conduits necessary for Fe(III) citrate, Fe(III) oxide, Mn(IV) oxide, or electrode reduction by Geobacter sulfurreducens. J Bacteriol. 2018;200:e00347–18.
Tada Y, Marumoto K, Takeuchi A. Nitrospina-like bacteria are potential mercury methylators in the mesopelagic zone in the East China Sea. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:1369.
Bae H-S, Dierberg FE, Ogram A. Periphyton and flocculent materials are important ecological compartments supporting abundant and diverse mercury methylator assemblages in the Florida Everglades. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2019;85:e00156–19.
Bravo AG, Loizeau J-L, Dranguet P, Makri S, Björn E, Ungureanu VGH, et al. Persistent Hg contamination and occurrence of Hg-methylating transcript (hgcA) downstream of a chlor-alkali plant in the Olt River (Romania). Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2016;23:10529–41.
Christensen GA, Gionfriddo CM, King AJ, Moberly JG, Miller CL, Somenahally AC, et al. Determining the reliability of measuring mercury cycling gene abundance with correlations with mercury and methylmercury concentrations. Environ Sci Technol. 2019;53:8649–63.
Liu Y-R, Johs A, Bi L, Lu X, Hu H-W, Sun D, et al. Unraveling microbial communities associated with methylmercury production in paddy soils. Environ Sci Technol. 2018;52:13110–8.
Millera Ferriz L, Ponton DE, Storck V, Leclerc M, Bilodeau F, Walsh DA. et al. Role of organic matter and microbial communities in mercury retention and methylation in sediments near run-of-river hydroelectric dams. Sci Total Environ. 2021;774:145686
Roth S, Poulin BA, Baumann Z, Liu X, Zhang L, Krabbenhoft DP, et al. Nutrient inputs stimulate mercury methylation by syntrophs in a subarctic peatland. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:741523.
Jones DS, Johnson NW, Mitchell CPJ, Walker GM, Bailey JV, Pastor J, et al. Diverse communities of hgcAB+ microorganisms methylate mercury in freshwater sediments subjected to experimental sulfate loading. Environ Sci Technol. 2020;54:14265–14274.
Capo E, Feng C, Bravo AG, Bertilsson S, Soerensen AL, Pinhassi J, et al. Expression levels of hgcAB genes and mercury availability jointly explain methylmercury formation in stratified brackish waters. Environ Sci Technol. 2022;56:13119–30.
Bowers RM, Stepanauskas R, Harmon-Smith M, Doud D, Reddy TBK, Schulz F, et al. Minimum information about a single amplified genome (MISAG) and a metagenome-assembled genome (MIMAG) of bacteria and archaea. Nat Biotechnol. 2017;35:725–31.
Simon J, Kern M, Hermann B, Einsle O, Butt JN. Physiological function and catalytic versatility of bacterial multihaem cytochromes c involved in nitrogen and sulfur cycling. Biochem Soc Trans. 2011;39:1864–70.
Capo E, Bravo AG, Soerensen AL, Bertilsson S, Pinhassi J, Feng C, et al. Deltaproteobacteria and Spirochaetes-like bacteria are abundant putative mercury methylators in oxygen-deficient water and marine particles in the Baltic Sea. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:574080.
Gionfriddo CM, Stott MB, Power JF, Ogorek JM, Krabbenhoft DP, Wick R, et al. Genome-resolved metagenomics and detailed geochemical speciation analyses yield new insights into microbial mercury cycling in geothermal springs. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2020;86:e00176–20.
Goñi-Urriza M, Klopp C, Ranchou-Peyruse M, Ranchou-Peyruse A, Monperrus M, Khalfaoui-Hassani B, et al. Genome insights of mercury methylation among Desulfovibrio and Pseudodesulfovibrio strains. Res Microbiol. 2020;171:3–12.
Levar CE, Hoffman CL, Dunshee AJ, Toner BM, Bond DR. Redox potential as a master variable controlling pathways of metal reduction by Geobacter sulfurreducens. ISME J. 2017;11:741–52.
Berg JS, Michellod D, Pjevac P, Martinez-Perez C, Buckner CRT, Hach PF, et al. Intensive cryptic microbial iron cycling in the low iron water column of the meromictic Lake Cadagno: a cryptic microbial iron cycle. Environ Microbiol. 2016;18:5288–302.
Schaefer JK, Morel FMM. High methylation rates of mercury bound to cysteine by Geobacter sulfurreducens. Nat Geosci. 2009;2:123–6.
Bravo AG, Zopfi J, Buck M, Xu J, Bertilsson S, Schaefer JK, et al. Geobacteraceae are important members of mercury-methylating microbial communities of sediments impacted by waste water releases. ISME J. 2018;12:802–12.
Langwig MV, De Anda V, Dombrowski N, Seitz KW, Rambo IM, Greening C, et al. Large-scale protein level comparison of Deltaproteobacteria reveals cohesive metabolic groups. ISME J. 2021;16:307–20.
Galushko A, Kuever J. Smithellaceae. Bergey’s Manual of Systematics of Archaea and Bacteria. In: Trujillo ME, Dedysh S, DeVos P, Hedlund B, Kämpfer P, Rainey FA, et al. (eds). 1st ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2021.
Capo E, Broman E, Bonaglia S, Bravo AG, Bertilsson S, Soerensen AL, et al. Oxygen‐deficient water zones in the Baltic Sea promote uncharacterized Hg methylating microorganisms in underlying sediments. Limnol Oceanogr. 2022;67:135–46.
King JK, Kostka JE, Frischer ME, Saunders FM. Sulfate-reducing bacteria methylate mercury at variable rates in pure culture and in marine sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000;66:2430–7.
Guimarães JRD, Mauro JBN, Meili M, Sundbom M, Haglund AL, Coelho-Souza SA, et al. Simultaneous radioassays of bacterial production and mercury methylation in the periphyton of a tropical and a temperate wetland. J Environ Manag. 2006;81:95–100.
Worth DF. Gradient changes in water quality during low flows in run-of-the-river and reservoir impoundments, lower Snake River, Idaho. Lake Reserv Manag. 1995;11:217–24.
Muyzer G, Stams AJM. The ecology and biotechnology of sulphate-reducing bacteria. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2008;6:441–54.
Beulig F, Røy H, Glombitza C, Jørgensen BB. Control on rate and pathway of anaerobic organic carbon degradation in the seabed. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2018;115:367–72.
Idaho Department of Environmental Quality, Oregon Department of Environmental Quality. Snake River - Hells Canyon: Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL). 2004.
Acknowledgements
Funding was provided by Idaho Power Company, the Idaho Department of Environmental Quality, the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Cooperative Matching Funds, Toxics Substances Hydrology, and Contaminant Biology programs (Environmental Health Mission Area). Graduate student support was provided through the University of Wisconsin Water Resources Institute Program through support from the USGS under Grant/Cooperative Agreement No. G20AP00001 (Project ID 2019WI001G) and through the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program. Computational analyses were performed on the Wisconsin Energy Institute computing cluster, funded by the Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center through the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science. Chuck Hoovestol and Chris Larsen provided extensive sampling support. Analytical support was provided by John DeWild, Sarah Janssen, Jake Ogorek, Christopher Babiarz, and Ron Antweiler (USGS). Collin Eagles-Smith, James Willacker, and Mark Marvin-DiPasquale (USGS) provided helpful feedback on data analyses. Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. All authors declare no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
BDP, BAP, DPK, and KDM conceived and designed the presented study; BAP, DPK, AKB, JN, and NG designed the parent study; BDP, BAP, DPK, MTT, AKB, JN, NG, and KDM collected samples; BAP analyzed water chemistry samples; BDP prepared DNA for sequencing, conducted metagenomic analyses, and generated figures; BDP, BAP, DPK, MTT, AKB, JN, NG, and KDM interpreted data. BDP wrote the manuscript with BAP, and DPK, MTT, AKB, JN, NG, and KDM provided critical feedback on the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Peterson, B.D., Poulin, B.A., Krabbenhoft, D.P. et al. Metabolically diverse microorganisms mediate methylmercury formation under nitrate-reducing conditions in a dynamic hydroelectric reservoir. ISME J 17, 1705–1718 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-023-01482-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-023-01482-1