Abstract
Hydrothermal plumes transport reduced chemical species and metals into the open ocean. Despite their considerable spatial scale and impact on biogeochemical cycles, niche differentiation of abundant microbial clades is poorly understood. Here, we analyzed the microbial ecology of two bathy- (Brothers volcano; BrV-cone and northwest caldera; NWC) and a mesopelagic (Macauley volcano; McV) plumes on the Kermadec intra-oceanic arc in the South Pacific Ocean. The microbial community structure, determined by a combination of 16S rRNA gene, fluorescence in situ hybridization and metagenome analysis, was similar to the communities observed in other sulfur-rich plumes. This includes a dominance of the vent characteristic SUP05 clade (up to 22% in McV and 51% in BrV). In each of the three plumes analyzed, the community was dominated by a different yet uncultivated chemoautotrophic SUP05 species, here, provisionally named, Candidatus Thioglobus vadi (McV), Candidatus Thioglobus vulcanius (BrV-cone) and Candidatus Thioglobus plumae (BrV-NWC). Statistical analyses, genomic potential and mRNA expression profiles suggested a SUP05 niche partitioning based on sulfide and iron concentration as well as water depth. A fourth SUP05 species was present at low frequency throughout investigated plume samples and may be capable of heterotrophic or mixotrophic growth. Taken together, we propose that small variations in environmental parameters and depth drive SUP05 niche partitioning in hydrothermal plumes.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Hydrothermal vents occur along oceanic spreading zones and volcanic arcs, in back-arc basins, and in intra-plate volcanoes. At these sites, high-temperature fluids enriched in reduced chemical compounds vent from the seafloor and mix with ambient seawater until they reach a depth of neutral buoyancy. These plumes spread over large spatial scales and thus, have a substantial impact on biogeochemical cycles [1,2,3,4]. As the vent-sourced catabolic energy input is considerable for the deep-sea [5], plumes offer a thriving habitat for microorganisms. Microbial communities inhabiting hydrothermal plumes are diverse, owing to the mixing of typical deep-sea bacteria, such as SAR11, SAR324 and MG-I Archaea [6] with chemolithoautotrophs indicative of the different physico-chemical plume signatures [7, 8].
A microbial clade well known to inhabit hydrothermal sulfur-rich plumes, is the SUP05 clade within the Gammaproteobacteria [9]. Members of this diverse clade have successfully adapted to various lifestyles such as free-living organisms in plumes [8], oxygen-minimum zones (OMZ) [10,11,12], pelagic redoxclines [13, 14] and as symbionts of clams, mussels and sponges [15,16,17]. In addition to dark carbon fixation fueled by reduced sulfur compounds and hydrogen oxidation [18], SUP05 clade bacteria have also been postulated to maintain a heterotrophic metabolism [19, 20]. Several representatives of this clade have already been cultivated and assigned to the genera Candidatus Thioglobus and Pseudothioglobus [21,22,23]. Despite the widespread occurrence and high diversity of this clade, the localization and niche partitioning of SUP05 in hydrothermal plumes has not yet been elucidated.
In this study, we address microbial diversity and niche partitioning of SUP05 in hydrothermal plumes derived from degassing volcanoes in the Kermadec intra-oceanic arc. The vent fluids in this hydrothermal system exhibit large compositional variability due to differences in the type of sub-seafloor magmatic-hydrothermal reactions and water depth [24, 25]. We investigated three plumes in the Kermadec Arc, one of which is sourced from Macauley volcano (McV, ~300 m depth) and the other two are sourced from two distinct hydrothermal sites hosted in the Brothers volcano (BrV, ~1600 m depth). Kleint et al. [26] have shown that the geochemical variability of these vent fluids in terms of acidity as well as metal and gas contents is extremely large. In our study, we combined an extensive geochemical dataset with 16S rRNA gene analysis, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), metagenomics and metatranscriptomics to distinguish different species within the SUP05 clade and develop a hypothesis on SUP05 niche separation.
Methods
Site description and sampling
The Kermadec Arc is one of the most hydrothermally active intra-oceanic arcs in the world [24, 25]. Two of its submarine volcanoes, McV and BrV were sampled during R/V Sonne expedition SO253 in December 2016–January 2017. McV rises to a depth of ~300 m below sea level (mbsl) and emits fluids influenced by SO2-rich magmatic vapors. Disproportionation of SO2 upon cooling results in high concentrations of H2S (10 mM) and sulfuric acid, the dissociation of which causes low pH and high contents of total dissolved iron (DFe) (1.7 mM) [26]. BrV, in contrast, exhibits vents with different fluid compositions: (1) NW Caldera (NWC) site (~1600 mbsl) is influenced by water-rock interaction and shows high DFe (12.4 mM) and low H2S (1.1 mM); (2) two resurgent volcanic edifices in the SE section of the caldera—the upper cone (1220 mbsl) and lower cone (1320 mbsl) hydrothermal sites—are of magmatic-hydrothermal origin with high H2S (5.0 mM) and low metal (DFe: 15 µM) concentrations [26].
Hydrothermal plumes were mapped and discrete water samples were collected using a conductivity-temperature-depth device (CTD) during vertical casts and tow-yo operations [27]. The Seabird 9plus CTD had integrated sensors for optical backscatter (Seapoint Turbidity Meter, 5X custom sensitivity) and oxidation-reduction potential (NOAA-PMEL ORP sensor; [28]) in a rosette with 22 10-L Niskin bottles.
Water samples were filtered through 0.22 μm pore size polycarbonate membrane filters directly after retrieval of the CTD on board. For FISH, cells were fixed with formaldehyde prior to filtration (details on sample collection: Supplementary Materials and Methods).
16S rRNA gene analysis and CARD-FISH
Genomic DNA was extracted using the PowerSoil DNA Isolation Kit (MoBio, Ca, USA). The V3-V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene was amplified using the primer combination Bakt_341F and Bakt_805R [29] with barcodes [30]. PCR products were sequenced on an Ion Torrent Personal Genome Machine (PGM) System (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA USA) using Ion PGM Hi-Q chemistry, partly on-board (details: Supplementary Materials and Methods).
Adapters were trimmed with cutadapt v1.9 [31]. Mothur v1.39.5 [32] was used for quality trimming (qthreshold = 10, minlength = 250 bp and maxhomop = 10). In total, 20,000 reads were subsampled using the reformat.sh script from BBTools v35.14 [33]. Subsampled reads were analyzed using the SilvaNGS v1.3 pipeline [34] with the SILVA SSU Ref taxonomy (release 132) and default parameters. Phylogenetic trees were constructed using the software package ARB [35] (details on phylogenetic tree reconstruction: Supplementary Materials and Methods).
Catalyzed reporter deposition-FISH (CARD-FISH) analysis was performed according to Pernthaler et al. [36]. CARD-FISH details, including probes used in this study and counting details are described in Supplementary Materials and Methods.
Metagenome sequence and analysis
Genomic DNA was sheered to a fragment size of ~400 bp using a S2 sonicator (Covaris, Woburn, MA USA) followed by the protocol “Ovation Ultralow System v2 1-16” (NuGEN, CA, USA). The fragments were sequenced in paired-end mode (2 × 250 bp) on a HiSeq 2500 (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) at the Max Planck Genome Centre (Cologne, Germany).
Metagenomic reads were first quality checked with FastQC v0.11.7 [37]. BBDuk part of BBTools v35.14 [33] was used for read trimming with minimum quality Phred score of 20 and 100 bp minimum length. Additionally, Nonpareil was used to assess the level of coverage in our metagenomes [38].
Subsequently, metagenomes were assembled with MEGAHIT v1.0.2 [39] using k-mer steps of 10 and a maximum k-mer size of 127. In order to retrieve high completeness and low contamination MAGs, each metagenome was individually assembled and co-assembled with other metagenomes coming from the same hydrothermal system (BrV or McV).
Individual assemblies of five McV metagenomes were binned with Metawatt v3.5.3 [40] (default parameters, contig threshold = 1 kb, minimum seed bin size = 5 kb). Four single assemblies of BrV metagenomes were binned using CONCOCT [41] (default parameters) in anvi’o v6.1 [42]. Additionally, a co-assembly of the four metagenomes from BrV resulted in MAGs with higher completeness and less contamination compared to individual assemblies of the same metagenomes. Moreover, targeted re-assembly, as described in Meier et al. [43], was performed on Gammaproteobacteria MAGs using the SPAdes assembler v3.10.1 [44] (default parameters, careful mode). After the application of 2–3 re-assembly rounds, twelve more than 50% complete SUP05-related MAGs were retrieved. Completeness and contamination of the MAGs was analyzed by CheckM [45]. All MAGs were visualized and manually refined using anvi’o v6.1 [42]. For details on MAG analysis see Supplementary Materials and Methods.
Metatranscriptome sequence and analysis
Filter pieces were thawn on ice and RNAlater was removed carefully (exception: 54CTD_b12). Total RNA was extracted using a phenol/chloroform based extraction method with polyvinylpolypyrrolidone containing extraction buffer (for details see Supplementary Materials and Methods). DNA was removed by DNase treatment (Turbo DNase, Thermo Fisher Scientific) and total RNA was purified using RNA clean and concentrator (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA, USA). Capillary electrophoresis (Picochip, Agilent Bioanalyser; Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) was used for quality assessment. An Illumina-compatible library was generated with the NEBNext Ultra II Directional RNA Library Prep kit (NEB, Ipswich, MA, USA) followed by sequencing on a HiSeq 2500 platform (2 × 250 bp; Illumina).
Reads were quality trimmed using Trimmomatic v0.39 [46] with phred 33, minimum length of 70 bp and a sliding window every 4 bp for a required quality 15. After sorting of rRNA reads using SortMeRNA [47] 16S rRNA sequences were classified using the SilvaNGS pipeline [34] with SILVA SSU138 taxonomy. Metatranscriptomes were mapped onto annotated SUP05-related MAGs (minid = 97) using BBMap [33] and reads mapped were normalized using Geneious Prime 2019.2 (Biomatters, Auckland, New Zealand). Transcripts per million (TPMs) were calculated for normalization of transcripts. The expression of house-keeping genes was estimated by calculating the TPM of three reference genes (proC, recA, rpoD) [48] that were present in all MAGs. The heatmap was created with pheatmap [49] and the viridis [50] package in R [51]. Additionally, metagenome and metatranscriptome raw reads were mapped to SUP05-related MAGs using BBMap (minid = 99%) [33]. In order to account for ambiguity, metatranscriptomes and metagenomes were mapped to MAGs sharing an ANI > 98% using BBSplit of the BBTools package (minid = 99%) [33]. RPKM was calculated based on MAG length and number of reads mapped.
Thermodynamic calculations
Gibb’s free energy (∆rG) per mol of substrate was calculated using procedures detailed in Meier et al. [43]. We used Geochemist’s Workbench (Aqueous Solutions LLC, Champaign, IL) and a 250 bar thermodynamic database to compute reference state Gibb’s free energies (∆rGo) and activity coefficients. Measured DFe concentration in plume waters were used to compute ∆rG (details: Supplementary Materials and Methods section).
Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses were carried out in R [51] using the vegan [52], stats v3.6.2 and gvlma v1.0.0.3 [53] packages. Multivariate analyses (Redundancy, perMANOVA; ref. [54], and linear regression) were performed using a Bray–Curtis dissimilarity matrix with a 1% abundance threshold and standardized (log transformed), geochemical parameters (details: Supplementary Materials and Methods).
Data accession
Raw reads and Metagenome-Assembled Genomes (MAGs) were submitted to the European Nucleotide Archive under project number PRJEB42974. Metagenomes are found under the accession numbers SAMEA8000741–SAMEA8000749, metatranscriptomes are found under SAMEA8000750–SAMEA8000753. 16S rRNA gene amplicons can be found under project accession PRJNA721877.
Results
Microbial diversity
In order to explore the structure and function of McV and BrV plume microbial communities, 26 samples were collected with tow-yo and vertical CTD casts at different depths, chemical properties and plume intensities (Table S1). The dataset comprises two background samples from outside of the main hydrothermal fields at comparable depths, 11 plume samples taken at McV (depth between 195 mbsl and 351 mbsl) and 13 plume samples from BrV (depth between 1229 mbsl and 1750 mbsl) (Fig. 1).
Microbial communities were dominated by clades within the Alphaproteobacteria, Deltaproteobacteria (reclassified as Deltabacterota phy. nov.; ref. [55]) and Gammaproteobacteria. At a higher taxonomic resolution, the most prevalent taxa included different subclades of the SAR11 (Alphaproteobacteria) (up to 60% in McV and 25% in BrV), the SAR324 phylum (up to 13% in McV and 16% in BrV) and the gammaproteobacterial SUP05 clade (1–23% in McV and 5–51% in BrV) (Fig. 2). Within the SUP05, different subclades dominated at McV compared to BrV. Phylogenetic analysis (Fig. S1) classified these as Candidatus Thioglobus autotrophicus-related (CTA), Candidatus Thioglobus thermophilus-related (CTT) and Candidatus Pseudothioglobus singularis-related (CPS) bacteria. CTA sequences were present exclusively at McV (up to 17%). CPS sequences were less than 2% abundant across all samples at BrV and <1% at McV. CTT sequences ranged up to 8% in McV and dominated the BrV SUP05 community (up to 49%). Vent characteristic Sulfurimonas were present in all samples, constituting up to 4% read abundance.
Statistical analysis and thermodynamic considerations
Distance based redundancy analysis (dbRDA) indicated a correlation between microbial community composition and changes in geochemical parameters (Fig. S2). Firstly, dbRDA revealed that, at McV, CTA were shown to be positively impacted by DFe, temperature, DOC, PO4 and TDN. A PerMANOVA test confirmed that the parameters that could explain the community the most were O2 (53% p = 0.001) and DFe (13% p = 0.002). On the contrary, at BrV, CTT was negatively impacted by DOC, temperature and O2. At BrV, a PerMANOVA indicated that DFe (20% p = 0.08) was the only significant parameter.
Furthermore, a linear regression was applied in order to model the relationship between the microbial community and the geochemical parameters (Table S2). At McV, the relative abundance of CTA was positively affected by decreasing H2S concentration (p = 0.02) and increasing DFe (p = 0.02), total dissolved oxygen (O2) (p = 0.003) and temperature (p = 0.05). Whereas, CTT present in all BrV samples, responded positively to higher PO4 (p = 0.01), depth (p = 0.07) and lower TDN (p = 0.01), CPS was significantly affected only by pH (p = 0.01).
Thermodynamic calculations indicated that aerobic oxidation of sulfide was the most energetically favorable process along all sites (maximum values: McV: −97.38 kj/mol e−; BrV: −96.37 kj/mol e−), releasing almost twice as much kJ per mol electron than iron oxidation (maximum values: McV: −58.85 kj/mol e−; BrV: −56.16 kj/mol e−) (Fig. S3).
Microbial abundance determined by CARD-FISH
CARD-FISH was conducted on representative samples to confirm the relative abundance patterns of Bacteria, Archaea, Gammaproteobacteria, and specifically, SUP05-clade bacteria (Fig. S4).
At McV total cell counts were in a range from 9.4 × 104 to 1.5 × 105 cells/ml. Bacteria accounted for 29% (04CTD_b6) – 52% (10CTD_b2) of all cells, dominating over Archaea with 20% (04CTD_b6) – 25% (04CTD_b4). CARD-FISH counts confirmed a high abundance of SUP05-clade bacteria at McV with up to 24% in the samples with a high turbidity (∆NTU). The total number of other Gammaproteobacteria, was overall in a range of 0.7% (10CTD_b10) to 6% (04CTD_b10).
At BrV, total cell counts ranged between 2.7 × 104 to 4.3 × 104 cells/ml. Also here, Bacteria dominated (52% 54CTD_b15 – 80% 54CTD_b8) over Archaea (8% 54CTD_b8 – 19% 54CTD_b15). As already suggested by 16S rRNA gene amplicon analysis, samples characterized by a high ∆NTU contained an increased abundance of SUP05-related bacteria (up to 67% 54CTD_b8). Other Gammaproteobacteria were present in low abundance in a range from 0.2% (54CTD-b4) to 5% (49CTD_b2).
Additionally, all samples were checked for the presence of grazers by DAPI staining, yet no evidence for eukaryotes with food vacuoles was found.
Metagenomes analysis
Nine representative samples were selected for metagenomic sequencing in order to elucidate the metabolic potential of abundant clades, these included five samples from McV (04CTD_b6, 10CTD_b2, 10CTD_b4, 10CTD_b10 and 10CTD_b12) and four from BrV (cone: 49CTD_b10, 49CTD_b16; NWC: 54CTD_b8 and 54CTD_b12) (Fig. 1 and Table S3).
According to Nonpareil [38], the sequencing depth of the metagenomes covered 41–72% of the community (Table S3). The taxonomic distribution of McV and BrV metagenomes was analyzed by sorting and classifying the 16S rRNA marker gene using SortMeRNA [47]. This largely supported the 16S rRNA gene amplicon analysis with a fluctuation of up to 7% for SUP05 subgroups (Fig. S5).
Community-wide functional analysis between plumes
In order to compare the functional capacities between McV and BrV as well as other plumes, a community-wide analysis was conducted based on functional genes. The other samples analyzed were Woody Crack (buoyant plume, Menez Gwen, Mid Atlantic Ridge) [43], Mariner and Kilo Moana (plume, Eastern Lau Spreading Centre (ELSC)) [56] and background South Pacific Ocean samples [57]. Based on a dissimilarity matrix of functional genes, a neighbor joining tree revealed five distinct groups: (1) McV, (2) BrV, (3) ELSC, (4) Woody Crack metagenomes and (5) background samples, reflecting their diverse geochemical properties and/or the geographical distances between them (Fig. S6). According to a bi-plot PCoA analysis, the variable contributing the most to the dissimilarities was the relative abundance of the cytochrome c oxidase and cytochrome b gene. This was supported by a high number of cytochrome c oxidase and cytochrome b genes in McV metagenomes (Fig. S7). SUP05-affiliated cytochrome genes reached up to 34% of all cytochromes at McV and up to 23% of all cytochromes at BrV (Fig. S8).
Metagenome-assembled genomes
A total of 17 MAGs were retrieved (Table S4), that past a completeness threshold of 50%, and were taxonomically affiliated with Sulfurimonas, uncultured Chloroflexi, uncultured Acidimicrobiales, SAR324, Erythrobacter (Fig. S9) and the SUP05 clade.
MAG-1 to -4 were obtained from McV and have completeness values of 70–78% (contamination 4–10%). Six SUP05 MAGs (MAG-5_1, MAG-6_1, MAG-6_2 and MAG-7_1 to MAG-7_3) from BrV had completeness values ranging from 53% (MAG-7_2) to 86% (MAG-5_1). Additionally, a cross-assembly of BrV metagenomes resulted in higher completeness SUP05 MAGs: MAG-5 (completeness 94%, contamination 0%) and MAG-6 (completeness 92%, contamination 0.8%). MAGs were subsequently de-replicated at a 95% ANI threshold (65% coverage threshold), generating three species clusters: SUP05–1–4 (MAG-1 to 4), SUP05–5 (MAG-5 and 5_1) and SUP05–6 (MAG-6, 6_1 and 6_2) (Table S5).
SUP05-1-4 had a high abundance in the plume of McV (04CTD_b6, 10CTD_b2, 10CTD_b4 and 10CTD_b12) and were almost absent from BrV plumes. In contrast, SUP05–5 and -6 prevailed in plumes at BrV and were rare in the McV plume. SUP05-5 was ~3.8 fold more abundant in the BrV-Cone plume compared to SUP05-6, but SUP05-6 was ~1.7 fold more abundant in the BrV-NWC than SUP05-5 (Table S4). Physico-chemical parameters influencing positively the abundance of SUP05-5 and -6 were shown to be depth, nutrients and Cd, whereas SUP05-1-4 was impacted positively mostly by DOC, H2S, O2, and DFe (Fig. S10).
GTDB phylogenetic analysis
Phylogenetic analysis, based on single copy marker genes, with additional SUP05 MAGs retrieved from a previous hydrothermal study [58] and available genomes from the GTDB database [59], revealed a branching of SUP05-5 together with CTA. SUP05-1-4 was placed on a branch distant to any Candidatus genome (Fig. 3), hence, conflicting with 16S rRNA gene based phylogeny (Fig S1). However, in this genus, a stable branching could not be resolved either for the genome, or the 16S rRNA gene based tree, leading to generally low bootstrap support.
Average nucleotide identity comparison
According to ANI values, SUP05-1-4 belong to a single, not previously described species. SUP05-5 shares 95% ANI value with MAG UWMA-0078 (GCA_012964705.1) [60] and SUP05-6 belongs to the same species (96.2% ANI) as MAG UBA2013 (GCA_002335045.1) [61] (Table S5).
MAG-7_1, -7_2 and -7_3 were affiliated with CPS (Fig. 3) and were not significantly impacted by any of the recorded chemical parameters (Fig S10). They seemed to be characterized by a constantly low abundance across all samples (Table S4). Nevertheless, they seemed to be 10-fold more abundant at BrV than McV.
Metagenome-assembled genomes’ metabolic capabilities
We analyzed in detail the metabolic capabilities of three SUP05 clusters (SUP05-1-4, SUP05-5 and SUP05-6) and MAG_7-1 to MAG_7-3 (Fig. 4). Three clusters of MAGs contained genes for the sulfur oxidation complex (SOX), such as soxYZ, soxAX and soxB. Genes for the reverse acting dissimilatory sulfite reductase (rDSR; dsrMNKJOP) were also present in those SUP05 clusters, but not detected in MAG-7_1 to -7_3. Nitrite reductase genes were encoded in SUP05-5 and SUP05-6. Furthermore, all SUP05 MAGs harbor genes encoding the RubisCO enzyme, a marker gene for the Calvin Benson Bassham cycle. SUP05-1-4 was the only cluster in which methyl-accepting chemotaxis genes could be detected. All MAGs harbored genes for amino acid and long-chain fatty acid transportation. However, SUP05-1-4 and MAG-7_1, -7_2 and -7_3 harbored the most diverse transport genes, including di-tricarboxylate, dipeptide and oligopeptide transporters. All SUP05-related MAGs contained GH23, GH73 and GH103 genes, known to degrade peptidoglycan [62, 63]. SUP05 clusters contained genes for iron transport, siderophore transport and iron gene regulation [64, 65]. Lastly, all SUP05-related MAGs had inconclusive viral genes, belonging to Category 3 (possible prediction) [66].
Metatranscriptome analysis
In order to elucidate the set of expressed metabolic pathways, four metatranscriptomes were sequenced: two samples from McV (04CTD_b6 and 10CTD_b4) and two from BrV-NWC (54CTD_b8 and 54CTD_b12). According to 16S rRNA gene expression, SUP05 is the most active bacterial clade in the plume samples, composing 72% of the total bacterial transcripts in 10CTD_b4, 56% in 04CTD_b6, 80% in 54CTD_b8 and 60% in 54CTD_b12. Among the most expressed genes were house-keeping genes like polymerases and ribosomal proteins, and the genes involved in chemolithoautotrophy such as: sulfur oxidation genes (SOX) and RubisCO (Fig. S11).
Moreover, the total mRNA reads were mapped unambiguously against each SUP05 MAG to investigate their expression profile. Transcripts of 04CTD_b6 and 10CTD_b4 mapped in a higher number to genes of MAG-1 to -4, reaching up to 1.7 % of total mRNA (Table S4). Whereas, 54CTD_b8 and 54CTD_b12 transcripts recruited on MAG-5 and MAG-6 genes reached up to 3.3%. As high numbers of cytochrome genes were identified in the McV metagenomes, the expression of these genes in SUP05 MAGs was inspected. For MAG-1 to -4, genes for cytochrome polypeptide I-III were highly expressed in relation to house-keeping genes (Fig. 5). According to house-keeping genes’ expression, MAG-1 to MAG-4 were not active in the BrV plumes. Simultaneously, MAG-5 and MAG-6 were not active in McV plume, but similarly active in both BrV plume samples. The expression ratio between cytochrome and house-keeping genes in MAG-1 to MAG-4 was higher compared to MAG-5 and MAG-6 (Fig. S12). SoxZ expression ratio in MAG-1 to MAG-4 was lower than in MAG-5 and MAG-6, indicating the pertinence of cytochrome genes in the McV plume.
Global distribution of proposed new Candidatus Thioglobus species
The global distribution of SUP05 MAGs revealed a widespread occurrence of MAG-1-4 in the surface of the open ocean (up to 0.6 RPKM) and deep chlorophyll maximum (DCM; up to 0.5 RPKM) with increased abundance values in the coastal area (Figs. 6, S13 and S14). MAG-1 to 4 showed the highest read abundance (2.6 RPKM) in the Woody Crack mesopelagic buoyant plume sampled at 828 m depth (Figs. 6 and S13). Conversely, MAG-5 and 6 had 100-fold less reads mapped to surface and DCM metagenomes (Figs. 6, S13 and S14). Nevertheless, MAG-6 prevailed in the bathypelagic plumes of Lau Basin (10.6 RPKM), whereas MAG-5 had its highest abundance in Mariner Lau Basin (8.4 RPKM) (Fig. S13). In contrast, read recruitment of the mesopelagic TARA Oceans metagenomes, and TARA Oceans metagenomes from OMZ resulted in less read recruitment for MAG-1-4 (up to 0.18 RPKM) and almost none for MAG-5 and 6 (<0.001 RPKM). Recruitment of bathypelagic Malaspina 2010 [67] metagenomes revealed only a few mapped reads for all MAGs (< 0.006 RPKM), indicating an absence from the deep-sea (Fig. 6 and Table S6).
Discussion
Sulfur-rich plumes act as oases for chemolithoautotrophic SUP05 [56, 58, 68]. In order to better understand their diversity and ecology, we investigated the microbial communities of three plumes expelled by two submarine volcanoes with a multidisciplinary approach. Thereby, we were able to characterize and describe three new, yet uncultivated SUP05 species, Candidatus Thioglobus vadi (corresponding to SUP05-1-4), Candidatus Thioglobus vulcanius (corresponding to SUP05-5) and Candidatus Thioglobus plumae (corresponding to SUP05-6; Table S7). Each of these three species dominated a different plume which suggests that they partition into different environmental niches.
SUP05 niche differentiation
As the sulfur-oxidizing SUP05 were the prominent primary producers in McV and BrV, we compared the SUP05 populations of three plumes. This comparison revealed a distinct presence of SUP05 species in bathy- and mesopelagic plumes.
The BrV was composed of two bathypelagic plumes, which were dominated by different SUP05 clusters, SUP05-5 in the BrV-cone (~1300 mbsl) and SUP05-6 in the BrV-NWC (~1600 mbsl), suggesting a niche differentiation between the two plumes. Since these MAGs fulfill the standards given in Konstantinidis et al. [69] and Murray et al. [70] for a genome-based taxonomy, we propose SUP05-5 as Candidatus Thioglobus vulcanius and SUP05-6 as Candidatus Thioglobus plumae (Table S7). Both species were more abundant in bathypelagic plumes (Abe, Mariner, Tahi Moana, Kilo Moana and Tui Manilla) compared to SUP05-1-4 but exhibited extremely low abundance in other analyzed locations (DCM, surface and deep open ocean), establishing their niche in the bathypelagic sulfur-rich plumes. Regarding the factors that drive the niche differentiation between these two species in BrV-cone and BrV-NWC, Ca. T. vulcanius seemed to be better equipped to endure the toxicity of heavy-metals present in the plume (Fig. S15). However, different properties such as substrate affinity and sulfide toxicity still need to be investigated [23].
Secondly, SUP05-1-4 represented the dominant SUP05 species in the mesopelagic plume of McV (~300 mbsl), and were present at higher abundances in the open ocean and specifically the coastal areas. In line with our observation in McV, SUP05-1-4 also prevail in a mesopelagic buoyant plume sampled at Woody Crack in a depth of 828 m. According to ANI values, SUP05-1-4 MAGs are evidently strains of the same species. Although the completeness of these MAGs does not exceed 85%, likely reflecting the challenges arising from high strain heterogeneity, MAG-1 to 4 fulfill the standards given in Konstantinidis et al. [69] and Murray et al. [70] to be characterized as a new Candidatus species. Here, we propose the name Candidatus Thioglobus vadi, meaning bacterium “of a shallow place”. Statistical analysis suggests that this species prefers oxygenated sites with lower sulfide (highest abundance in 10CTD_b4–202.3 µM H2S) and higher iron concentration (10CTD_b4–22.2 nM; Fig. 2). Global distribution of Ca. T. vadi indicates that also depth may have a niche determining effect (Figs. 7A and S13).
SUP05 MAG-7_1, 7_2 and 7_3 affiliated to Ca. Pseudothioglobus singularis, a representative of the recently classified Pseudothioglobus genus [23]. They were characterized by high expression of oligopeptide, branched-chain amino acid and nucleoside transporters (Fig. S11c), and a missing sulfur-oxidizing (SOX) pathway. Growth experiments done by Spietz et al. [20], using the closely-related species CPS PS1, reported that carbon fixation is not critical for their growth and suggested the capacity for heterotrophy. Nevertheless, due to the low completeness of the MAGs, it is challenging to identify the lifestyle of these closely-related species.
In conclusion, niche differentiation of SUP05 within hydrothermal plumes, seems to predominantly affect chemoautotrophic subclades, whereas supposedly heterotrophic SUP05, like MAG-7_1 to MAG-7_3 are more omnipresent (Figs. 2 and 7C).
Considering the role of iron
It was previously shown that SUP05 bacteria use energy gained from the oxidation of reduced sulfur species to fuel dark carbon fixation [71]. Particularly, the SUP05 clade is distinguished by the formation of sulfur globules and the oxidation of sulfur via the reverse dissimilatory sulfate reduction pathway (rDSR) [72]. The ability to hoard sulfur is an advantageous trait that could support a cosmopolitan and opportunistic lifestyle. In order to understand the potential preference of Ca. T. vadi for iron-rich niches, we conducted an in-depth investigation of its genetic potential and expression profiles.
Similar to Ca. T. autotrophicus, our data support the oxidation of reduced sulfur compounds with oxygen as electron acceptor. Typically, genes coding for proteins involved in sulfur oxidation are the most expressed in hydrothermal vent plumes [56] due to the thermodynamic favourability of oxidizing sulfur compounds. The total dissimilatory energy available is eight times greater for sulfide oxidation. Indeed, in Ca. T. vadi, sulfur oxidation related genes were among the most expressed. Also, the high mRNA expression level of cytochrome genes was noteworthy. This expression coincided with an exceptionally high number of cytochrome genes in the McV metagenomes compared to those from background seawater and other sites. Since cytochromes participate in energy conversion processes in the respiratory chain and during iron oxidation, the high expression of them in Ca. T. vadi could either mean that these cells were highly active, or that they were engaged in iron oxidation [64]. The first explanation is not supported by a relatively low expression of Ca. T. vadi house-keeping genes (Fig. S4a). Iron oxidation by Ca. T. vadi is also hard to verify, yet the following two considerations might make it at least plausible. Firstly, although under neutral pH, the spontaneous chemical oxidation of iron outcompetes the biological oxidation [73], in situ measurements indicate that the excess sulfide keeps Fe reduced due to a catalytic cycle. Slowly oxidizing nanoparticulate pyrite might therefore likely persist in the plume [74, 75]. Secondly, the exceptionally high expression of cytochrome oxidases genes might be linked to iron oxidation. However, the diversity of iron oxidation (FeOx) pathways and the divergence of the genes involved in iron oxidation [64, 76, 77] pose major challenges when assessing MAGs [78].
Nevertheless, we compared the SUP05 MAGs to the basic model of neutrophilic iron oxidation in Zetaproteobacteria [79]. SUP05 MAGs possess genes encoding for modules of the FeOx model, including cbb3 cytochrome c oxidase, bc1 cytochrome c oxidase, NADH dehydrogenase and ATP synthase. Although, cytochromes reported to be involved in FeOx extracellular electron exchange such as Cyc2, Pio or MtrCAB [73] were missing in Ca. T. vadi MAGs, other cytochromes with multiple heme-binding motifs (-CXXCH-) [65] were expressed. Here, the function of porin-cytochromes for electron transport could be substituted by multiheme cytochromes with Fe, potentially in a pyrite form, being oxidized by a different cellular mechanism other than the one known from neutrophilic iron-oxidizing bacteria [80]. Therefore, in our case, the iron oxidation hypothesis on Ca. T. vadi was supported by: (1) a high number of cytochrome genes being expressed; (2) cytochromes containing heme-binding motifs, which could substitute known modules in the neutrophilic FeOx pathway; (3) positive influence of DFe concentration on Ca. T. vadi abundance. We conclude that, although, there are good hints for iron oxidation by Ca. T. vadi, these are not yet conclusive.
Plume ecology
The ability of SUP05 to constitute up to 50% of the microbial community in an ephemeral plume remains enigmatic considering their immotility. Since SUP05 are absent in the early stages of the plume, due to suboptimal conditions, Sheik et al. [68] and Lesniewski et al. [81] suggested that vent-adapted microorganisms (SUP05) are entrained from surrounding water. This hypothesis is in line with our findings (Fig. 6) and other studies which have shown the influence of the background microbial community on the plume [4, 82]. As the background seawater contains a low number of SUP05 cells (5.94 × 102 cell/ml—04CTD_b4; Fig. S4), only a low number of cells entrains the plume. In the plume, SUP05 reaches up to 1.56 × 104 cell/ml (04CTD_b6), suggesting that they can react swiftly to reduced chemical species and are capable of rapid growth in their preferable spot in the hydrothermal plume (Fig. 7B). We observed that the absolute cell concentration of SUP05 in plumes was independent of depth (BrV—054CTD_b8: 2.68 × 104 cell/ml; McV—10CTD_b4: 3.49 × 104 cells/ml), although, due to the low number of cells in the deep-sea, the 16S rRNA analysis gives the impression that the bathypelagic plumes have a higher abundance of SUP05 (Fig. 2). On the contrary, the SUP05 “preferable spot” is an ephemeral site, which is characterized by low temperature, high oxygen concentration and low concentration of reduced sulfur species [58]. Shah et al. [71] showed that concentrations as low as 10 nM of reduced sulfur could support sulfur oxidation in oxygenated seawater. Therefore, owing to their ability to use miniscule amounts of reduced chemical species and to store sulfur [71, 83], SUP05 persevere in the background water (Fig. 6) as the cold water mixes with the hot reduced fluid (Fig. 7). Nevertheless, the dilution of the plume and the depletion of reduced chemical species, is followed by a reduction in SUP05 abundance. This could be observed in the 54CTD samples, where the vertical profile of SUP05 abundance closely resembles the vertical profile of the plume indicators (Table S8).
As the plume gets diluted, background seawater could feedback into the plume and re-introduce microorganisms [68], especially since the age of the plume is shown to be up to ~30 days [84]. Due to this cycle of entrainment and dilution of the vent-adapted microorganisms such as SUP05, the plume acts as growth chambers for SUP05, from which they are released into the surrounding water and could re-inoculate plumes.
Conclusion
By applying several complimentary culture-independent techniques, supported by an extensive set of geochemical measurements, we could shed light into the ecology of three novel candidate species of the clade SUP05. As expected, reduced chemical compounds present in the plume seem to have a significant influence on niche differentiation. Water depth seems to be another important factor. We show that the bathypelagic plumes are dominated by two different, yet uncultivated SUP05 species, Candidatus Thioglobus vulcanius, and Candidatus Thioglobus plumae, whereas the mesopelagic plume is dominated by the also yet uncultivated species Candidatus Thioglobus vadi. Knowing the physico-chemical characteristics of the environment, it is possible to predict the dominant SUP05 species in plumes of different hydrothermal systems, and vice versa certain SUP05 species might be indicators for the prevailing plume characteristics.
References
Gartman A, Findlay AJ. Impacts of hydrothermal plume processes on oceanic metal cycles and transport. Nat Geosci. 2020;13:396–402.
Sander SG, Koschinsky A. Metal flux from hydrothermal vents increased by organic complexation. Nat Geosci. 2011;4:145–50.
German CR, Casciotti KA, Dutay JC, Heimbürger LE, Jenkins WJ, Measures CI, et al. Hydrothermal impacts on trace element and isotope ocean biogeochemistry. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2016;374:20160035.
Ardyna M, Lacour L, Sergi S, d’Ovidio F, Sallée JB, Rembauville M, et al. Hydrothermal vents trigger massive phytoplankton blooms in the Southern Ocean. Nat Commun. 2019;10:1–8.
McCollom TM. Geochemical constraints on primary productivity in submarine hydrothermal vent plumes. Deep Res Part I Oceanogr Res Pap. 2000;47:85–101.
Dick GJ, Tebo BM. Microbial diversity and biogeochemistry of the Guaymas Basin deep-sea hydrothermal plume. Environ Microbiol. 2010;12:1334–47.
Nakamura K, Takai K. Theoretical constraints of physical and chemical properties of hydrothermal fluids on variations in chemolithotrophic microbial communities in seafloor hydrothermal systems. Prog Earth Planet Sci. 2014;1:1–24.
Dick GJ. The microbiomes of deep-sea hydrothermal vents: distributed globally, shaped locally. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2019;17:271–83.
Sunamura M, Higashi Y, Miyako C, Ishibashi JI, Maruyama A. Two bacteria phylotypes are predominant in the Suiyo Seamount hydrothermal plume. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004;70:1190–8.
Lavik G, Stührmann T, Brüchert V, Van Der Plas A, Mohrholz V, Lam P, et al. Detoxification of sulphidic African shelf waters by blooming chemolithotrophs. Nature. 2009;457:581–4.
Canfield DE, Stewart FJ, Thamdrup B, De Brabandere L, Dalsgaard T, Delong EF, et al. A cryptic sulfur cycle in oxygen-minimum-zone waters off the Chilean coast. Science. 2010;330:1375–8.
Callbeck CM, Lavik G, Ferdelman TG, Fuchs B, Gruber-Vodicka HR, Hach PF, et al. Oxygen minimum zone cryptic sulfur cycling sustained by offshore transport of key sulfur oxidizing bacteria. Nat Commun. 2018;9:1.
Glaubitz S, Kießlich K, Meeske C, Labrenz M, Jürgens K. SUP05 Dominates the gammaproteobacterial sulfur oxidizer assemblages in pelagic redoxclines of the central baltic and black seas. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013;79:2767–76.
Pjevac P, Korlević M, Berg JS, Bura-Nakić E, Ciglenečki I, Amann R, et al. Community shift from phototrophic to chemotrophic sulfide oxidation following anoxic holomixis in a stratified seawater lake. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015;81:298–308.
Zhou K, Zhang R, Sun J, Zhang W, Tian RM, Chen C, et al. Potential interactions between clade SUP05 sulfur-oxidizing bacteria and phages in hydrothermal vent sponges. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2019;85:1–20.
Duperron S, Nadalig T, Caprais JC, Sibuet M, Fiala-Médioni A, Amann R, et al. Dual symbiosis in a Bathymodiolus sp. mussel from a methane seep on the Gabon Continental Margin (Southeast Atlantic): 16S rRNA phylogeny and distribution of the symbionts in gills. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005;71:1694–700.
Ansorge R, Romano S, Sayavedra L, Porras MÁG, Kupczok A, Tegetmeyer HE, et al. Functional diversity enables multiple symbiont strains to coexist in deep-sea mussels. Nat Microbiol. 2019;4:2487–97.
Anantharaman K, Breier JA, Sheik CS, Dick GJ. Evidence for hydrogen oxidation and metabolic plasticity in widespread deep-sea sulfur-oxidizing bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:330–5.
Wang W, Li Z, Zeng L, Dong C, Shao Z. The oxidation of hydrocarbons by diverse heterotrophic and mixotrophic bacteria that inhabit deep-sea hydrothermal ecosystems. ISME J. 2020;14:1994–2006.
Spietz RL, Lundeen RA, Zhao X, Nicastro D, Ingalls AE, Morris RM. Heterotrophic carbon metabolism and energy acquisition in Candidatus Thioglobus singularis strain PS1, a member of the SUP05 clade of marine Gammaproteobacteria. Environ Microbiol. 2019;21:2391–401.
Marshall KT, Morris RM. Isolation of an aerobic sulfur oxidizer from the SUP05/Arctic96BD-19 clade. ISME J. 2013;7:452–5.
Shah V, Morris RM. Genome sequence of “Candidatus Thioglobus autotrophica” strain EF1, a chemoautotroph from the SUP05 clade of marine Gammaproteobacteria. Genome Announc. 2015;3:e01156–15.
van Vliet DM, von Meijenfeldt FAB, Dutilh BE, Villanueva L, Sinninghe Damsté JS, Stams AJM, et al. The bacterial sulfur cycle in expanding dysoxic and euxinic marine waters. Environ Microbiol. 2021;23:2834–57.
De Ronde CEJ, Baker ET, Massoth GJ, Lupton JE, Wright IC, Feely RA, et al. Intra-oceanic subduction-related hydrothermal venting, Kermadec volcanic arc, New Zealand. Earth Planet Sci Lett. 2001;193:359–69.
De Ronde CEJ, Baker ET, Massoth GJ, Lupton JE, Wright IC, Sparks RJ, et al. Submarine hydrothermal activity along the mid-Kermadec Arc, New Zealand: large-scale effects on venting. Geochem Geophys Geosyst. 2007;8:Q07007.
Kleint C, Bach W, Diehl A, Fröhberg N, Garbe-Schönberg D, Hartmann JF, et al. Geochemical characterization of highly diverse hydrothermal fluids from volcanic vent systems of the Kermadec intraoceanic arc. Chem Geol. 2019;528:119289.
Baker ET, Resing JA, Haymon RM, Tunnicliffe V, Martinez F, Ferrini V, et al. How many vent fields? New estimates of vent field populations on ocean ridges from precise mapping of hydrothermal discharge locations. Prog Earth Planet Sci. 2016;449:186–96.
Walker SL, Baker ET, Resing JA, Nakamura K, McLain PD. A new tool for detecting hydrothermal plumes: an ORP sensor for the PMEL MAPR. AGU Fall Meet Abstr. 2007;2007:V21D–0753.
Herlemann DPR, Labrenz M, Jürgens K, Bertilsson S, Waniek JJ, Andersson AF. Transitions in bacterial communities along the 2000 km salinity gradient of the Baltic Sea. ISME J. 2011;5:1571–9.
Reintjes G, Tegetmeyer HE, Bürgisser M, Orlić S, Tews I, Zubkov M, et al. On-site analysis of bacterial communities of the ultraoligotrophic South Pacific Gyre. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2019;85:e00184–19.
Martin M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet J. 2011;17:10–2.
Schloss PD, Westcott SL, Ryabin T, Hall JR, Hartmann M, Hollister EB, et al. Introducing mothur: Open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009;75:7537–41.
Bushnell B. BBMap (version 35.14) [Software]. 2015. https://sourceforge.net/projects/bbmap/.
Quast C, Pruesse E, Yilmaz P, Gerken J, Schweer T, Yarza P, et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: Improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:D590–6.
Ludwig W, Strunk O, Westram R, Richter L, Meier H, Yadhukumar A, et al. ARB: a software environment for sequence data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:1363–71.
Pernthaler A, Pernthaler J, Amann R. Fluorescence in situ hybridization and catalyzed reporter deposition for the identification of marine bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002;68:3094–101.
Andrews S. FastQC: a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. Babraham Bioinformatics; 2010.
Rodriguez-R LM, Gunturu S, Tiedje JM, Cole JR, Konstantinidis KT. Nonpareil 3: fast estimation of metagenomic coverage and sequence diversity. mSystems. 2018;3:e00039–18.
Li D, Luo R, Liu CM, Leung CM, Ting HF, Sadakane K, et al. MEGAHIT v1.0: a fast and scalable metagenome assembler driven by advanced methodologies and community practices. Methods. 2016;102:3–11.
Strous M, Kraft B, Bisdorf R, Tegetmeyer HE. The binning of metagenomic contigs for microbial physiology of mixed cultures. Front Microbiol. 2012;3:410.
Alneberg J, Bjarnason BS, De Bruijn I, Schirmer M, Quick J, Ijaz UZ, et al. Binning metagenomic contigs by coverage and composition. Nat Methods. 2014;11:1144–6.
Eren AM, Kiefl E, Shaiber A, Veseli I, Miller SE, Schechter MS, et al. Community-led, integrated, reproducible multi-omics with anvi’o. Nat Microbiol. 2021;6:3–6.
Meier DV, Bach W, Girguis PR, Gruber-Vodicka HR, Reeves EP, Richter M, et al. Heterotrophic proteobacteria in the vicinity of diffuse hydrothermal venting. Environ Microbiol. 2016;18:4348–68.
Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, et al. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol. 2012;19:455–77.
Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 2015;25:1043–55.
Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:2114–20.
Kopylova E, Noé L, Touzet H. SortMeRNA: fast and accurate filtering of ribosomal RNAs in metatranscriptomic data. Bioinformatics. 2012;28:3211–7.
Gomes AÉ, Stuchi LP, Siqueira NM, Henrique JB, Vicentini R, Ribeiro ML, et al. Selection and validation of reference genes for gene expression studies in Klebsiella pneumoniae using Reverse Transcription Quantitative real-time PCR. Sci Rep. 2018;8:1–4.
Kolde R. pheatmap: Pretty heatmaps. 2015. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=pheatmap.
Garnier S. viridis: Default Color Maps from’matplotlib’. 2017. https://CRAN.R-project.org/.
R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2013.
Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Friendly M, Kindt R, Legendre P, McGlinn D, et al. Vegan: Community ecology package. 2020.
Pena EA, Slate EH. gvlma: Global validation of linear models assumptions. R package version 1.0.0.3. 2019. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=gvlma.
Anderson MJ. A new method for non parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecol. 2001;26:32–46.
Waite DW, Chuvochina M, Pelikan C, Parks DH, Yilmaz P, Wagner M, et al. Proposal to reclassify the proteobacterial classes Deltaproteobacteria and Oligoflexia, and the phylum Thermodesulfobacteria into four phyla reflecting major functional capabilities. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2020;70:5972–6016.
Anantharaman K, Breier JA, Dick GJ. Metagenomic resolution of microbial functions in deep-sea hydrothermal plumes across the Eastern Lau Spreading Center. ISME J. 2016;10:225–39.
Biller SJ, Berube PM, Dooley K, Williams M, Satinsky BM, Hackl T, et al. Data descriptor: marine microbial metagenomes sampled across space and time. Sci Data. 2018;5:1–7.
Meier DV, Pjevac P, Bach W, Hourdez S, Girguis PR, Vidoudez C, et al. Niche partitioning of diverse sulfur-oxidizing bacteria at hydrothermal vents. ISME J. 2017;11:1545–58.
Chaumeil P-A, Mussig AJ, Hugenholtz P, Parks DH. GTDB-Tk: a toolkit to classify genomes with the Genome Taxonomy Database. Bioinformatics. 2019;36:1925–7.
Zhou Z, Tran PQ, Kieft K, Anantharaman K. Genome diversification in globally distributed novel marine Proteobacteria is linked to environmental adaptation. ISME J. 2020;14:2060–77.
Parks DH, Rinke C, Chuvochina M, Chaumeil PA, Woodcroft BJ, Evans PN, et al. Recovery of nearly 8,000 metagenome-assembled genomes substantially expands the tree of life. Nat Microbiol. 2017;2:1533–42.
Blackburn NT, Clarke AJ. Identification of four families of peptidoglycan lytic transglycosylases. J Mol Evol. 2001;52:78–84.
Hashimoto W, Ochiai A, Momma K, Itoh T, Mikami B, Maruyama Y, et al. Crystal structure of the glycosidase family 73 peptidoglycan hydrolase FlgJ. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2009;381:16–21.
Ilbert M, Bonnefoy V. Insight into the evolution of the iron oxidation pathways. Biochim Biophys Acta Bioenerg. 2013;1827:161–75.
Barco RA, Emerson D, Sylvan JB, Orcutt BN, Jacobson Meyers ME, Ramírez GA, et al. New insight into microbial iron oxidation as revealed by the proteomic profile of an obligate iron-oxidizing chemolithoautotroph. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015;81:5927–37.
Guo J, Bolduc B, Zayed AA, Varsani A, Dominguez-Huerta G, Delmont TO, et al. VirSorter2: a multi-classifier, expert-guided approach to detect diverse DNA and RNA viruses. Microbiome. 2021;9:1–13.
Duarte CM. Seafaring in the 21st century: the Malaspina 2010 circumnavigation expedition. Limnol Oceanogr Bull. 2015;24:11–14.
Sheik CS, Anantharaman K, Breier JA, Sylvan JB, Edwards KJ, Dick GJ. Spatially resolved sampling reveals dynamic microbial communities in rising hydrothermal plumes across a back-arc basin. ISME J. 2015;9:1434–45.
Konstantinidis KT, Rosselló-Móra R, Amann R. Uncultivated microbes in need of their own taxonomy. ISME J. 2017;11:2399–406.
Murray AE, Freudenstein J, Gribaldo S, Hatzenpichler R, Hugenholtz P, Kämpfer P, et al. Roadmap for naming uncultivated Archaea and Bacteria. Nat Microbiol. 2020;5:987–94.
Shah V, Zhao X, Lundeen RA, Ingalls AE, Nicastro D, Morris RM. Morphological plasticity in a sulfur-oxidizing marine bacterium from the SUP05 clade enhances dark carbon fixation. MBio. 2019;10:e00216–19.
Yamamoto M, Takai K. Sulfur metabolisms in Epsilon- and Gammaproteobacteria in deep-sea hydrothermal fields. Front Microbiol. 2011;2:192.
White GF, Edwards MJ, Gomez-Perez L, Richardson DJ, Butt JN, Clarke TA. Mechanisms of bacterial extracellular electron exchange. Adv Micro Physiol. 2016;68:87–138.
Findlay AJ, Estes ER, Gartman A, Yücel M, Kamyshny A, Luther GW. Iron and sulfide nanoparticle formation and transport in nascent hydrothermal vent plumes. Nat Commun. 2019;10:1–7.
Gartman A, Luther GW. Oxidation of synthesized sub-micron pyrite (FeS2) in seawater. Geochim Cosmochim Acta. 2014;144:96–108.
Bonnefoy V, Holmes DS. Genomic insights into microbial iron oxidation and iron uptake strategies in extremely acidic environments. Environ Microbiol. 2012;14:1597–611.
Singh VK, Singh AL, Singh R, Kumar A. Iron oxidizing bacteria: insights on diversity, mechanism of iron oxidation and role in management of metal pollution. Environ Sustain. 2018;1:221–31.
He S, Barco RA, Emerson D, Roden EE. Comparative genomic analysis of neutrophilic iron(II) oxidizer genomes for candidate genes in extracellular electron transfer. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:1584.
McAllister SM, Polson SW, Butterfield DA, Glazer BT, Sylvan JB, Chan CS. Validating the Cyc2 neutrophilic iron oxidation pathway using meta-omics of Zetaproteobacteria iron mats at marine hydrothermal vents. mSystems. 2020;5:e00553–19.
Barco RA, Hoffman CL, Ramírez GA, Toner BM, Edwards KJ, Sylvan JB. In-situ incubation of iron-sulfur mineral reveals a diverse chemolithoautotrophic community and a new biogeochemical role for Thiomicrospira. Environ Microbiol. 2017;19:1322–37.
Lesniewski RA, Jain S, Anantharaman K, Schloss PD, Dick GJ. The metatranscriptome of a deep-sea hydrothermal plume is dominated by water column methanotrophs and lithotrophs. ISME J. 2012;6:2257–68.
Reed DC, Breier JA, Jiang H, Anantharaman K, Klausmeier CA, Toner BM, et al. Predicting the response of the deep-ocean microbiome to geochemical perturbations by hydrothermal vents. ISME J. 2015;9:1857–69.
Maki JS. Bacterial intracellular sulfur globules: structure and function. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013;23:270–80.
Neuholz R, Kleint C, Schnetger B, Koschinsky A, Laan P, Middag R, et al. Submarine hydrothermal discharge and fluxes of dissolved Fe and Mn, and He isotopes at Brothers Volcano based on radium isotopes. Minerals. 2020;10:969.
Waite DW, Vanwonterghem I, Rinke C, Parks DH, Zhang Y, Takai K, et al. Comparative genomic analysis of the class Epsilonproteobacteria and proposed reclassification to Epsilonbacteraeota (phyl. nov.). Front Microbiol. 2017;8:682.
Waite DW, Vanwonterghem I, Rinke C, Parks DH, Zhang Y, Takai K, et al. Addendum: comparative genomic analysis of the class Epsilonproteobacteria and proposed reclassification to Epsilonbacteraeota (phyl. nov.). Front Microbiol. 2018;9:772.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank officers, crew, shipboard scientific party and the technical team on R/V Sonne cruise SO253, for their invaluable assistance. The cruise SO253 with R/V Sonne was an integral part of the Cluster of Excellence of the MARUM “The Ocean in the Earth System, Research Area GB: Geosphere-Biosphere Interactions” funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG). Funding of this project (03G0253) was provided by the BMBF (German Federal Ministry of Education and Research) and is gratefully acknowledged. We thank Cornel de Ronde for the scientific support. We thank Bruno Huettel and the team of the Max Planck Genome Centre in Cologne for sequencing. Further, we would like to thank Kathrin Büttner for excellent technical assistance in the Molecular Ecology department and Taylor Priest for all the help and support. We further acknowledge the help of Carola Lehners of the Microbiogeochemistry group at the ICBM for nutrient analysis, Patrick Laan and Rob Middag from NIOZ for iron analysis and Ina Ulber for DOC/TDN analysis at the ICBM/University of Oldenburg. We thank Aharon Oren for sharing his knowledge on the field of etymology and Andrea Koschinsky for the support and great discussion. PMEL contribution of this study is 5274. This work was supported by the Max Planck Society.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
BD performed molecular and bioinformatic analyses. CTH, RN, BS, and CK were responsible for chemical analyses. SW conducted modeling of the plume distribution. WB provided expertise on thermodynamic calculations and geology. AM carried out shipboard sampling and molecular analyses. AM and RA conceived the study. BD, RA, and AM wrote the manuscript with the input from all coauthors. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Dede, B., Hansen, C.T., Neuholz, R. et al. Niche differentiation of sulfur-oxidizing bacteria (SUP05) in submarine hydrothermal plumes. ISME J 16, 1479–1490 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-022-01195-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-022-01195-x
This article is cited by
-
Thiothrix and Sulfurovum genera dominate bacterial mats in Slovak cold sulfur springs
Environmental Microbiome (2023)
-
Metabolic handoffs between multiple symbionts may benefit the deep-sea bathymodioline mussels
ISME Communications (2023)
-
High abundance of hydrocarbon-degrading Alcanivorax in plumes of hydrothermally active volcanoes in the South Pacific Ocean
The ISME Journal (2023)
-
A hydrogenotrophic Sulfurimonas is globally abundant in deep-sea oxygen-saturated hydrothermal plumes
Nature Microbiology (2023)
-
Seasonal bacterial niche structures and chemolithoautotrophic ecotypes in a North Atlantic fjord
Scientific Reports (2022)