Abstract
Predation by heterotrophic protists drives the emergence of adaptive traits in bacteria, and often these traits lead to altered interactions with hosts and persistence in the environment. Here we studied adaptation of the cholera pathogen, Vibrio cholerae during long-term co-incubation with the protist host, Acanthamoeba castellanii. We determined phenotypic and genotypic changes associated with long-term intra-amoebal host adaptation and how this impacts pathogen survival and fitness. We showed that adaptation to the amoeba host leads to temporal changes in multiple phenotypic traits in V. cholerae that facilitate increased survival and competitive fitness in amoeba. Genome sequencing and mutational analysis revealed that these altered lifestyles were linked to non-synonymous mutations in conserved regions of the flagellar transcriptional regulator, flrA. Additionally, the mutations resulted in enhanced colonisation in zebrafish, establishing a link between adaptation of V. cholerae to amoeba predation and enhanced environmental persistence. Our results show that pressure imposed by amoeba on V. cholerae selects for flrA mutations that serves as a key driver for adaptation. Importantly, this study provides evidence that adaptive traits that evolve in pathogens in response to environmental predatory pressure impact the colonisation of eukaryotic organisms by these pathogens.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Predation by heterotrophic protists and bacteriophages represent a major driving force shaping bacterial population structure and composition [1, 2]. In response to predation pressure, bacteria have developed sophisticated mechanisms and adaptive traits which enhance their survival and persistence in the environment [3, 4]. Antipredator strategies are hypothesised to have evolved from predation pressure and play crucial roles in predation resistance and virulence, which supports the ‘coincidental evolution’ hypothesis [5,6,7,8]. The hypothesis states that, virulence arises as an accidental consequence of antipredator mechanisms in distinct niches rather than for virulence per se. In contrast, predation driven attenuation of virulence has also been observed and this results in increased commensalism between bacteria and hosts/predators [9,10,11]. Such commensal relationships enhance pathogen persistence and transmission in the environment.
Patho-adaptations to protist hosts are now widely recognised to function as training grounds for bacterial pathogens including Vibrio cholerae, the waterborne bacterium that causes the acute diarrhoeal disease, cholera [12]. Cholera follows a distinct pattern with recurring episodes of seasonal epidemics suggesting potential involvement of environmental factors in the survival of the organism in the environment [13], including interactions with heterotrophic protists [14]. It has been reported that the free-living amoeba, Acanthamoeba castellanii, and the ciliate, Tetrahymena pyriformis, serve as environmental hosts for V. cholerae [15, 16]. In fact, T. pyriformis and other ciliates expel a hyper-infectious form of V. cholerae packaged in released food vacuoles [5], suggesting that protists play an important role in the infection cycle of V. cholerae by increasing environmental resistance and persistence. A growing number of reports have described the roles of different phenotypic traits and their mechanisms of grazing resistance in V. cholerae. For example, changes in biofilm formation, secondary metabolite production (e.g. pyomelanin), extracellular proteases (e.g. HapA, PrtV) and quorum-sensing mediated production of anti-protozoal factors are involved in grazing resistance and association with diverse protist hosts [17,18,19,20]. Swimming motility controls the frequency of contact depending on the type of protist hosts. Increased swimming speed enhances grazing avoidance when encountering some flagellated protists [21], while enhancing the frequency of contact with raptorial feeding protists [22, 23]. Grazing resistance of biofilms largely depends on the type of protozoan grazers. Surface-feeding protozoa, such as amoeba preferentially feed on biofilm cells whereas suspension-feeding protozoa (i.e. ciliates and flagellates) feed mainly on planktonic cells [24]. Anti-protozoal activities of V. cholerae biofilms have been shown to provide grazing resistance to different protozoan hosts [20]. Extracellular proteases have also been shown to confer grazing resistance to flagellated and ciliated protozoa [17]. Other secreted factors, such as the hemolysin also play important roles in the intracellular survival of V. cholerae in protozoa [19]. However, many aspects of the interactions between protozoa and V. cholerae are yet to be explored, in particular the selective pressure exerted by long-term exposure to predation and the emergence of adaptive traits which allow the pathogen to persist in the environment.
This study aimed to identify adaptive traits that arise as a result of long-term co-adaptation of V. cholerae with A. castellanii. Changes in genotypic and phenotypic characteristics of V. cholerae in the presence and absence of amoeba for 90 days were investigated in populations as well as in individual isolates. The late-stage amoeba-adapted isolates showed increased survival and competitive fitness in amoeba. There was a decrease in motility, biofilm formation and haemolytic activity and an increase in protease activity in amoeba-adapted isolates compared to non-adapted isolates. We found that the altered phenotypic behaviours and improved fitness in late-stage amoeba-adapted V. cholerae was associated with mutations in the flagellar transcriptional master regulator, flrA (VC2137). Finally, we show that mutations in flrA increase the competitive fitness and colonisation potential of V. cholerae in zebrafish. Taken together, these results show that adaptation of V. cholerae in a natural host can drive the evolution of host–pathogen interactions.
Materials and methods
Organisms and growth conditions
V. cholerae O1 El Tor strain A1552 and its derivatives were routinely grown on Luria Bertani (LB) agar plates or in liquid LB medium with shaking. A. castellanii was routinely maintained axenically in peptone yeast glucose (PYG) medium supplemented with salts (ATCC medium 712) at room temperature in 25 cm2 tissue culture flasks with ventilated caps (Sarstedt Inc., Nümbrecht, Germany). A. castellanii was passaged 3 days prior to harvesting for experiments and enumerated microscopically using a hemocytometer. The long-term co-incubation was performed in (2M) marine minimal medium (1 M MOPS, pH 8.2; 132 mM K2HPO4; 952 mM NH4Cl; 0.4 M Tricine and 1 mM FeSO4.7H2O, pH 7.8 in artificial seawater) supplemented with 0.08% glucose [25]. The artificial seawater, or nine salts solution (0.5 X NSS) was composed of 17.6 g NaCl, 1.47 g Na2SO4, 0.08 g NaHCO3, 0.25 g KCl, 0.04 g KBr, 1.87 g MgCl2•6H2O, 0.45 g CaCl2•2H2O, 0.01 g SrCl2•6H2O and 0.01 g H3BO3 in one liter of distilled water [26]. All organisms, oligonucleotide primers and plasmids used in this study are listed in Supplementary Table 1.
Experimental co-adaptation of V. cholerae with A. castellanii
Three biological replicates of V. cholerae A1552 were grown overnight and washed with 2M medium [25], adjusted to 109 cells ml−1 (OD600 = 1.0) and 100 µL of diluted cells (~107 cells ml−1) were used to inoculate three independent cultures (P1, P2 and P3) of A. castellanii (1 × 105 cells ml−1) in 1 mL of 2M medium in 24-well plates. The plates were incubated at room temperature with shaking at 60 rpm. Every three days, the amoeba in three replicate wells were lysed with 1% Triton X-100 and the released V. cholerae passaged to a fresh plate of amoeba. One half of the V. cholerae cells were placed at −80 °C for selection of individual isolates while the remainder was used for isolation of population genomic DNA for sequencing. In parallel as controls, three biological replicates of V. cholerae maintained in 2M medium in triplicate in the absence of amoeba were sub-cultured every three days in fresh 2 M medium after treating with 1% Triton X-100. The V. cholerae grown in presence or absence of A. castellanii were defined as adapted and non-adapted populations, respectively. The individual clones derived from the populations were defined as adapted and non-adapted isolates, respectively.
Intracellular survival assays
A. castellanii was seeded at a concentration of 1 × 105 cells ml−1 in 2M medium into 24-well plates 1 h prior to the addition of bacterial cells to allow them to adhere. Overnight amoeba-adapted and non-adapted isolates of V. cholerae were washed and diluted to OD600 1.0 in 2M medium. Diluted cells (107 cells) were used to inoculate triplicate wells of previously seeded A. castellanii at a final amoeba-bacteria ratio of 1:100. The plates were incubated statically at room temperature and intracellular bacteria were recovered at different time points by lysis with 1% Triton-X. Thirty minutes before lysis, 300 µg ml−1 of gentamicin (Sigma-Aldrich, United States) was added to kill extracellular bacteria followed by washing with 2M media to remove antibiotics. Intracellular bacteria were collected and resuspended in 2M medium before plating for enumeration. The percentage of intracellular survival was calculated for each of the isolates using the formula number of surviving bacteria at 4 h/number of surviving bacteria at 2 h.
Competition assays
In vitro and in vivo competition assays were conducted by mixing a ∆lacZ strain of A1552 with the amoeba-adapted isolates at a ratio of 1:1 (v/v). For in vitro competition assays, 100 µL of the mixed bacterial cells (~107 CFU ml−1) were inoculated into LB media and grown for 24 h. Serial dilutions of the cultures were plated on LB agar plates supplemented with 50 µg ml−1 X-gal (5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-D-galactopyranoside) which allowed enumeration of β-galactosidase-positive and negative V. cholerae colonies. For competition assays in amoeba, 100 µL (~107 CFU ml−1) of the mixed bacterial cells were incubated with amoeba (~105 cells ml−1) to a final amoeba-bacteria ratio of 1:100 for 24 h. Amoeba cells were lysed and intracellular bacteria were recovered as previously described. The competition index (CI) for each of the isolates were calculated by dividing the output ratio (adapted/∆lacZ) after incubation corrected by the input ratio.
Motility assays
Swimming motility assays were performed on LB plates containing 0.3% (w/v) agar. An overnight colony of the V. cholerae isolates was inoculated by stab and the plates were incubated at 30 °C for 24 h and imaged (Bio-Rad, USA). The diameters of the migration zone were measured using ImageJ.
Quantification of biofilm biomass
Biofilms were formed in microtiter plates and biomass was quantified by the crystal violet (CV) staining assay as described previously [27]. Briefly, V. cholerae clones were grown in LB to an OD600 of 0.6 (~106 cells ml−1). The normalised suspensions were diluted 100-fold and inoculated into fresh LB and grown for 36 h at room temperature. The aqueous phase was removed and the attached biomass washed with 50% NSS. The CV solution (0.1%) was added and incubated for 10 min at room temperature. The plate was washed to remove unbound CV and biofilm-associated CV was solubilized with 95% ethanol, and the OD600 was measured using a micro-plate reader (Tecan Spark, Switzerland). Values were corrected by deducting the baseline defined as LB medium. The experiment was performed in triplicate and run in three independent experiments.
Protease assay
Protease activity was determined by the azocasein assay as described previously [28]. Briefly, V. cholerae clones were grown overnight in LB at 37 °C with shaking at 200 rpm and adjusted to 109 cells ml−1 (OD600 = 1.0). The suspension was filtered and 100 µL of cell-free supernatant was mixed with 900 µL of azocasein solution (1% in 0.1 M Tris pH 8.0) for 4 h at 37 °C and the reaction stopped with the addition of equal volumes of 10 % trichloroacetic acid. Precipitated, undegraded protein was removed by centrifugation, the supernatant collected, and the absorbance determined by spectrophotometry (450 nm). The enzymatic activity unit was determined by the following formula U = Abs at 450 nm/conc. of substrate (g)/time (hour) and the activity unit standardised by OD600 of the culture prior to centrifugation.
Hemolysin assay
Hemolysin assays were performed using previously described methods with some modifications [29]. V. cholerae isolates grown in LB were centrifuged, washed and cell numbers adjusted to 109 cells ml−1 (OD600 = 1.0) in PBS (pH 7.4). Equal volumes of cells were mixed with 1% sheep erythrocyte suspensions and incubated at 37 °C for 2 h followed by incubation at 4 °C for 1 h. Unlysed RBCs were removed by centrifugation and haemolytic activity measured by spectrophotometry at 540 nm. Percentage of haemolysis was calculated using the formula (sample absorbance − blank absorbance)/(control absorbance − blank absorbance) × 100. As a positive control cells were lysed with 1% Triton X-100.
Sequencing and genomic analysis
Genomic DNA from three replicates (P1, P2, P3) of amoeba-adapted and non-adapted V. cholerae populations from days 3, 45 and 90 were subjected to genome sequencing and analysed for the presence of mutations (Supplementary Data 1 and Supplementary Data 2). In addition to whole population sequencing, 18 individual amoeba-adapted and non-adapted isolates were randomly selected (three from each population) for sequencing and analysis (Supplementary Data 3 and Supplementary Data 4).
Genomic DNA was extracted using the QIAamp DNA mini kit (Qiagen) according to manufacturer’s instructions. DNA concentration was measured using the Qubit dsDNA high sensitivity assay kit (Life Technologies). DNA libraries were prepared using TruSeq DNA sample preparation kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA), and sequenced on a MiSeq (Illumina, USA) to generate 2 × 150 bp paired-end reads at the Singapore Centre for Environmental Life Sciences Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. Sequenced reads were trimmed to remove adapter contamination and low-quality bases (≤Q20) using TrimGalore and were checked using FastQC before analysis (https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/trim_galore/. Accessed Nov 2019) [30].
Filtered reads were mapped to the V. cholerae O1 El Tor strain A1552 (NCBI GenBank accession no CP025936 and CP025937 for chromosome I and II respectively) and genetic variants including single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and insertions and deletions (INDELS) were called along with the respective genotype information of samples using the polymorphism mode of breseq pipeline with a polymorphism frequency cut off of 0.1 [31]. Mutation calls were manually curated to remove false positives and only the mutations that arose during the co-incubation period were considered. Point mutations including synonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms (sSNPs), non-synonymous SNPs (nsSNPs), intergenic mutations and INDELs (<50 bp) were identified. The numbers and types of genetic alterations identified in adapted and non-adapted populations and single isolates are depicted in Supplementary Fig. 1A, B. Short paired-end reads from the single isolates were assembled into contigs using SPAdes 3.11.1 [32]. The assembled genomes were used to design primers to detect SNPs by ARMS-PCR and to analyse the mutations by alignment using BLASTn. Multiple sequence alignment was performed on the T-coffee server and annotated using the Expasy Box shade tool [33]. All the populations and single isolates sequences were deposited under NCBI bio project accession number PRJNA685017.
Structural modelling of the FlrA AAA+ domain
Comparative modelling of the AAA+ domain of FlrA was generated using MolStar on the Protein Data Bank web server [34]. The crystal structure of the AAA+ domain of FleQ from Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Protein Data Bank code 5EXP) was used as the modelling template [35]. The amino acid residues were manually denoted according to the nsSNPs in the AAA+ domain.
Amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS)-PCR
ARMS-PCR were used to detect the single point mutations in flrA. The online primer1 tool (http://primer1.soton.ac.uk/primer1.html) was used to design allele specific primers. Briefly, a mismatch at the −2 position of the 3′ end of the primer was introduced following wild type or mutant alleles using principles establish for ARMS-PCR [36]. In addition, a common primer located at the 5′ and 3′ terminus of flrA were designed. These four primer sets were used in a single PCR reaction to detect wild type and mutant alleles. The presence of an allele was confirmed by size differences of allele specific amplicons in agarose gel electrophoresis. Primers targeting the A213V (C638T) and V261G (T782G) mutations of flrA are listed in Supplementary Table 1.
Generation and complementation of flrA mutant
The V. cholerae ∆flrA mutant was constructed by splicing overlap extension PCR (SOE PCR) and natural transformation [37]. Briefly, primers were used to amplify two flanking regions of the flrA gene (VC2137) and fused with the chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (cat) gene amplified from pKD3 using SOE PCR. The construct was transformed into V. cholerae using chitin-mediated natural transformation [38]. The transformants were selected on LB agar plates supplemented with 5 µg ml−1 of chloramphenicol. The cat gene was removed from the resultant transformants using the TransFLP method to get an in-frame deletion mutant [39]. The absence of the gene was confirmed by PCR.
For complementation, flrA from wild type A1552 as well as the mutants (A213V and V261G) from amoeba-adapted isolates were amplified by PCR and cloned into pBAD24 using Gibson assembly [40]. The recombinant plasmids were transformed into E. coli using chemical transformation and recombinant transformants selected on LB agar plates containing 100 µg ml−1 of ampicillin. Recombinant plasmids were extracted from E. coli using a GeneJET plasmid miniprep kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The recombinant plasmids were transformed into the V. cholerae ∆flrA mutant using chitin-mediated transformation. The transformants were selected on LB agar plates supplemented with 100 µg ml−1 of ampicillin. Sequences of all genes were verified using PCR for the WT copy and ARMS-PCR for the mutated copy with primers in Supplementary Table 1.
Scanning electron microscopy
Bacterial cultures were fixed with 2 % glutaraldehyde in PBS and then stored in PBS at 4 °C until processing. Twenty microliters of undiluted bacteria samples were vacuum filtered onto polycarbonate filters (diameter 47 mm, pore size 0.4 μm). The preparation was subjected to a dehydration series with ethanol and milli-Q water (35, 50, 75, and 100% ethanol for 10 min each) followed by hexamethyldisilazane (HMDS) drying (50 and 100% for 10 min each). Filters were mounted onto SEM mounts with carbon tape and air dried for 24 h before sputter coating with 10 nm of gold/palladium. Samples were imaged via an SEM (Zeiss supra 55).
Fluorescent tagging
Green fluorescent protein (GFP) and red fluorescent protein (DsRedExpress)-tagged strains were generated using mini-Tn7 delivery plasmids and the helper plasmid pUX-BF13 containing the Tn7 transposase gene as described previously [41]. For zebrafish experiments, the test strains were tagged with GFP and the isogenic ΔlacZ strain was tagged with RFP. Swapping of the fluorescent markers was previously tested in isogenic strains and did not alter other phenotypic traits [5]. Plasmids were transformed using chitin-mediated natural transformation into bacterial strains and transconjugants were selected on LB agar medium containing 50 µg ml−1 gentamicin at 30 °C. Fluorescent tagged strains were verified by PCR analysis and fluorescence microscopy.
Adult zebrafish infection and histology
Adult zebrafish (Danio rerio) infection experiments were carried out with ethical approval from the Sydney Local Health District Animal Welfare Committee approval 19–031. Zebrafish were raised to 6–12 months of age in a recirculating aquarium system. Animals were transferred to a 28 °C incubator with a 14:10 h light:dark cycle in 1 L beakers for overnight acclimatisation. Zebrafish were exposed to 5 × 109 CFU of V. cholerae test and lacZ negative strains for 6 h in 200 ml of aquarium system water yielding a final concentration of 2.5 × 107 CFU ml−1 [42]. Zebrafish were washed in a clean water system and housed until 24 h post infection. Zebrafish were euthanised by tricaine (MS-222, Sigma) overdose and intestines were dissected. Dissected intestines were homogenised in PBS using a bead beater at 4 °C and homogenates plated on LB agar containing rifampicin (50 µg ml−1) and X-gal (80 µg ml−1) for enumeration. The CI was calculated by dividing the output ratio (test strain/∆lacZ) after infection corrected by the input ratio.
For the histology, dissected intestines were fixed in 10 % neutral buffered formalin overnight at 4 °C, rinsed in PBS, and then incubated in 30% (w/v) sucrose, 50:50 30 % sucrose:OCT (4583, Tissue-Tek), and OCT for ~4 h each [43]. Tissue was frozen in OCT and cryosectioned in 20 μm sections. Slides were rinsed in PBS, coverslips were mounted with DAPI fluoromount G (ProSciTech), and imaging was carried out on a Leica DM6000B microscope [43]. Fluorescent bacteria were quantified by fluorescent pixel count of sections in ImageJ [44]. Data are pooled from two animals per group.
Statistical analysis
GraphPad Prism software version 9 La Jolla California USA, (www.graphpad.com) was used for statistical analysis. Two-tailed student’s t tests (non-parametric Mann–Whitney tests) were used to compare means between WT and mutant bacteria. Statistical analysis for experiments with multiple samples were performed using either two-way ANOVA and Sidak’s multiple comparisons test or one-way ANOVA and Kruskal–Wallis test. Principal component analysis (PCA) was conducted in rstudio using the ‘ggfortify’ package (https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/ggfortify/index.html).
Results
We tested the effects of long-term co-adaptation of V. cholerae to the amoeba predator, A. castellanii. It has been suggested that long-term predation can result in genotypic and phenotypic changes in bacterial prey and that these changes can affect environmental persistence and colonisation of host organisms. Here, V. cholerae was co-incubated with amoeba for 90 days in triplicate and intracellular bacteria were collected from amoeba in each replicate every 3 days. Samples of V. cholerae incubated in 2M medium only were also taken every 3 days as controls. To identify phenotypic changes, we first obtained individual isolates from both the co-incubation and control samples taken on days 3, 45 and 90. To identify the underlying mechanisms driving these phenotypic changes, sequencing of both the populations and the individual isolates, from both the co-incubation and control samples obtained at the 3 times points were performed.
Increased intracellular survival and competitive fitness of amoeba-adapted isolates
Three biological replicates (P1, P2, and P3) of V. cholerae were grown in the presence and absence of amoeba for 90 days in marine minimal (2M) medium. In addition, individual V. cholerae isolates were collected every 3 days; adapted isolates were recovered from the co-cultures while non-adapted isolates were collected from 2M without amoeba. In total, 90 adapted and 90 non-adapted isolates were recovered, 30 from each treatment on days 3, 45 and 90. In order to assess differences in bacterial fitness, the intra-amoebal survival of the adapted isolates were assessed and compared to the non-adapted isolates using a gentamicin protection assay [45]. The gentamicin protection assay tests for the internalisation of bacterial cells as the antibiotic cannot penetrate eukaryotic cells, thus allowing for protection of intracellular bacteria against the antibiotic.
The intracellular survival of day 3 adapted and non-adapted isolates was not significantly different, while 45 and 90 day adapted isolates showed a fivefold increased survival compared to the non-adapted isolates (Fig. 1A). To further confirm the increased intracellular survival of the adapted isolates, an intracellular competition experiment was performed using a ∆lacZ isogenic strain. We calculated the competitive index (CI) from the competition experiment to assess the competitive fitness of the isolates in amoeba as the CI measures the fitness of bacteria in the condition tested [46]. After 24 h of incubation, day 3 adapted isolates showed a CI of ~1.0, while the CI of 45 and 90 day adapted isolates were 100.8 and 102.8, respectively, indicating approximately 100-fold increased fitness compared to the day 3 adapted isolates (p < 0.001) (Fig. 1B).
To determine if the increased fitness of the adapted isolates was due to a growth advantage, the in vitro CI in LB medium was investigated using the ∆lacZ isogenic strain. The CI for the day 3 adapted isolates was ~1.0, while the day 45 and 90 adapted isolates showed a tenfold increase in fitness (Fig. 1C) (p < 0.001). That the CI for intracellular survival of the adapted isolates was much greater compared to growth in LB, suggests there are additional adaptive traits allowing for the increased intracellular survival. Thus, long-term adaptation with amoeba results in V. cholerae isolates with increased fitness when cultured in LB and when incubated intracellularly in amoeba.
Altered phenotypes of amoeba-adapted isolates
To elucidate the factors contributing to the increased fitness of the adapted isolates, phenotypes such as motility, biofilm formation, hemolysin and protease production were evaluated. Results showed that the motility of the adapted and non-adapted isolates decreased over time. The motility of the day 3 adapted and non-adapted isolates did not differ significantly (p = 0.67; mean diameter ~14 mm), while the motility of 45 and 90 day adapted isolates were significantly decreased compared to the respective non-adapted isolates (p < 0.001; mean 2.4 and 2.7 mm, respectively) (Fig. 1D). There was no significant difference in biofilm formation for the day 3 adapted and non-adapted isolates (p = 0.37) (Fig. 1E). However, the biofilm biomass of adapted isolates from days 45 and 90 was significantly reduced to 40.8% (p < 0.001) and 54.9% (p < 0.001) respectively, compared to the non-adapted isolates.
Long-term adaptation also led to significant decreases in haemolytic activity of amoeba-adapted V. cholerae (Fig. 1F). The haemolytic activity of the day 3 adapted and non-adapted isolates did not differ significantly (p = 0.31). However, the haemolytic activity of adapted isolates from days 45 and 90 decreased to 30.4% (p < 0.001) and 43.1% (p < 0.001), respectively, compared to non-adapted isolates. In contrast to the results observed for haemolytic activity, long-term co-adaptation of V. cholerae with amoeba resulted in increased proteolytic activity (Fig. 1G). The protease activity of adapted and non-adapted isolates of V. cholerae from day 3 did not differ significantly (p = 0.33), while it significantly increased for adapted isolates from days 45 and 90 to 37.1% (p < 0.001) and 59.4% (p < 0.001), respectively. Thus, the amoeba-adapted isolates exhibit a temporal change in phenotypes with decreases in motility, biofilm formation and hemolysin activity while exhibiting increased protease activity.
Extended amoeba predation results in mutations in a conserved region of the master regulator flrA
Populations were sequenced to identify the range of variants (polymorphisms in genomes) that arose during the evolution experiment. Population sequencing at multiple time points allowed us to follow the trajectories of allelic diversity (mutations) to elucidate evolutionary dynamics. Single isolates were also sequenced to establish relationships between dominant alleles and to examine whether the single isolates carried the dominant mutations identified in the population data. We compared both datasets at corresponding time points and found correlation between them.
To identify underlying genetic changes that lead to the altered phenotypes, we analysed the genomic sequences of populations of adapted and non-adapted V. cholerae. A total of 144 and 146 different mutations (nsSNPs and sSNPs) and INDELs were observed in coding regions of adapted and non-adapted populations affecting 37 and 35 genes, respectively. Twenty-five mutated genes were common in both populations while 12 and 10 genes were unique to adapted and non-adapted populations, respectively (Supplementary Tables 2, 3). The flrA gene (VC2137) was the only gene that was consistently mutated in day 45 and 90 replicate adapted populations (6 nSNPs and 1 INDEL). The unique mutations that were detected in the coding regions in amoeba-adapted populations but not in non-adapted populations are presented in Fig. 2. Overall, most of the mutations fluctuate throughout the experiment and ultimately are lost in both adapted and non-adapted populations with very few of the mutations that appeared in the day 45 adapted populations persisting in day 90 adapted populations. Notably, four nsSNPs (L201W at 41.7%, S204R at 21.9%, A213V at 16.7% and V261G at 29.5% frequency) in the flagellar transcriptional master regulator, flrA, (VC2137) appeared in the day 45 adapted populations. The same four mutations also persisted in the day 90 adapted populations and the mutational frequencies increased to L201W at 74.3%, S204R at 46.6%, A213V at 29.2% and V261G at 63.3%.
Consistent with the population sequencing, analysis of genomes of single isolates revealed two nsSNPs (A213V and V261G) in flrA in the adapted isolates from days 45 and 90. These two mutations occurred at 100% frequency in the adapted isolates (Supplementary Data 3 and Supplementary Fig. 2). Unique and common genes that were mutated in adapted and non-adapted isolates are listed in Supplementary Tables 4, 5, respectively. Analysis of the mutations in flrA revealed that the central ATPase-associated domain with diverse cellular activities (AAA+) harbours all of the nsSNPs, while one deletion occurred in the flanking region of the central and C-terminal DNA binding helix turn helix (HTH) domain (Fig. 3A). FlrA protein sequences from different species of Vibrio and other Gram-negative bacteria were aligned (Fig. 3A) and show that all of the amino acids affected by the nsSNPs are highly conserved between species and in other Gram-negative bacteria (Supplementary Fig. 3). Structural modelling of the AAA+ domain with the FlrA homologue FleQ in P. aeruginosa revealed that all the observed nsSNPs lie in close proximity to each other (Fig. 3B). The sequence analysis of populations and single isolates showed that flrA is the only gene which was mutated in amoeba-adapted V. cholerae (days 45 and 90) but not in non-adapted V. cholerae.
Changes in virulence-associated phenotypes, increased intracellular survival and fitness are due to flrA mutations
To examine whether genetic mutations in flrA explain the observed changes in virulence factor production, increased intracellular survival and improved fitness of the 45 and 90 day adapted isolates, a flrA deletion mutant (∆flrA) in the ancestral background was generated. Interestingly, all of the phenotypic features that were observed in the adapted isolates were also observed in the ∆flrA mutant. The intracellular survival of the ∆flrA was approximately seven times greater than the WT and the mean survival rate of the non-adapted isolates (Fig. 4A). The CI of the ∆flrA was 100-fold greater compared to the WT in amoeba (Fig. 4B) and tenfold greater in LB (Fig. 4C). The ∆flrA had a 7.5-fold reduction in swimming motility (diameter of 2 mm) (Fig. 4D), a 55% reduction in biofilm biomass (Fig. 4E) and a 30% reduction in haemolysin activity compared to the WT (Fig. 4F). In contrast, the average protease activity for ∆flrA was 70% higher compared to WT (Fig. 4G). PCA of the changes in the four phenotypes (motility, biofilm, hemolysin and protease) reveals divergent patterns of the adapted isolates. The day 3 adapted isolates clustered with all the non-adapted isolates, while days 45 and 90 adapted isolates clustered with the ∆flrA (Fig. 4J).
To further confirm the mutations that arose during amoeba predation in flrA leads to all of the observed phenotypes, we targeted two nsSNPs in the flrA gene, A213V and V261G. These two mutations appeared in single isolates from the adapted populations. The WT copy of flrA as well as the mutated copies (A213V and V261G) were expressed in a ∆flrA background under the control of the arabinose inducible promoter of the expression vector pBAD24. To compare the motility of the complemented clones of the ∆flrA, an empty vector control was also tested. As expected, flrA complementation and induction with arabinose restores motility of the ∆flrA to WT levels while the expression of the mutated flrA alleles does not (Fig. 4H) To determine the effect of the point mutations in flrA on flagellum formation, adapted isolates harbouring A213V and V261G mutations in flrA were analysed under scanning electron microscopy. Image analysis confirmed a lack of flagellum on adapted isolates with the flrA point mutations (Fig. 4I). Hence, the alanine at 213 and valine at 261 are two essential residues in FlrA required for flagella production in V. cholerae.
Adaptation leads to enhanced colonisation of an aquatic host
Since the adapted isolates showed differences in production of multiple virulence-related traits, we hypothesised that they were primed for colonisation of higher eukaryotic organisms. To test this, the adult zebrafish model was used as this model supports a natural route of transmission and has been a suitable model for studies of colonisation and transmission of V. cholerae [47,48,49]. To measure the colonisation of the adapted isolates harbouring mutations in the flrA (A213V and V261G) relative to the ∆lacZ strain competition assays were performed. The CI was calculated from the cells recovered from each fish intestine after 24 h of infection. The results indicated that the ∆flrA colonised adult zebrafish 10-fold better than the ∆lacZ strain. The strains harbouring point mutations (A213V and V261G) in flrA colonised similarly to the ∆flrA (Fig. 5A). Zebrafish were infected with GFP-tagged test strains (Wild type, ∆flrA, flrA A213V, flrA V261G) and an RFP-tagged ∆lacZ strain. Imaging revealed greater binding to fish intestinal epithelial cells of V. cholerae flrA mutants compared to the ∆lacZ strain (Fig. 5B, C). The proportion of GFP and RFP fluorescence associated with fish intestinal epithelium cells recapitulated the trends seen in the CFU recovery assay. Hence, adaptation in amoeba increases the potential of V. cholerae to colonise higher eukaryotic organisms in the natural environment and contributes to the persistence and dissemination of the bacterium.
Discussion
The results described here have important implications for understanding the molecular mechanisms of bacterial adaptation and persistence in the environment. During intense predation pressure by free-living protozoa, V. cholerae is able to survive inside protozoan hosts. The results presented here show that this is achieved through a trade-off among multiple virulence traits that ultimately lead to increased fitness. The loss of motility may protect V. cholerae by reducing the frequency of contact with predators. It has been previously reported that motile bacteria experience increased rates of contact with raptorial feeding protists and hence are more susceptible to being ingested than non-motile cells [22, 23]. In addition, the flagellin protein functions as a pathogen-associated molecular pattern that binds to pattern-recognition receptors on a variety of defence cells, including macrophage and amoeba, thereby activating phagocytosis [50, 51].
Other reports suggest that the production of protease is critical for neutralisation of the HlyA haemolysin [52]. The haemolysin (HlyA) causes lysis of amoeba and by degrading the haemolysin, premature lysis of the amoeba host is prevented, hence ensuring a successful replication niche [19]. Here, we report that co-adaptation with amoeba led to an increase in protease activity and a concomitant decrease in haemolysin activity, further supporting the hypothesis that expression of haemolysin in amoeba is not advantageous for V. cholerae. The loss of motility has been shown to have a negative impact on biofilm formation, and it is likely that the decrease in immunogenic impacts of flagella outweigh the benefits during long-term co-adaptation, and is thus the result of a trade-off to ensure successful replication within the amoeba host. Further, as amoeba selectively graze on biofilm cells the long-term adaptation leads to less biofilm, further reducing predation pressure. The increase in intracellular survival and competitive fitness of adapted isolates in amoeba are the effect of synergistic actions of multiple traits in the adapted isolates.
Genome analysis of the amoeba-adapted V. cholerae populations and isolates revealed that the mutations in flrA were responsible for the increased fitness and changes in phenotypic traits. FlrA is the main regulator of the flagellar regulon and its inactivation leads to loss of flagellar synthesis [53, 54]. The regulator is widespread in bacteria and regulates diverse functions including motility, biofilm formation, virulence factor expression and sensing of small molecules [55,56,57]. The absence of a flagellum hampers early stages of biofilm formation in V. cholerae [58]. Consistent with our study, Syed et al. showed that absence of flrA increases the expression of the secreted proteases, HapA and PrtV, and the hemolysin HlyA [54]. It is likely that increased protease production in V. cholerae degrades the secreted haemolysin explaining our observations in the late-stage amoeba-adapted isolates [52]. The phenotypes observed in the late-stage amoeba-adapted isolates are an indication of increased HapR activity. HapR is the quorum-sensing master regulator in V. cholerae which positively regulates production of protease while negatively regulates biofilm formation [59]. Future studies will be needed to identify the putative link between flrA and hapR. However, it has been previously shown that FliA, a downstream target of FlrA, represses hapR expression [60]. Hence, in absence of FlrA the repression of hapR is likely be relieved thus increased proteases expression and decreased biofilm formation in late-stage adapted isolates might be due to the increased HapR activity.
Significantly, this study demonstrated that selection of multiple virulence-related traits in V. cholerae during adaptation with an amoebal host leads to increased colonisation in the zebrafish model of infection. As fish are potential reservoirs of V. cholerae, the increased colonisation may further contribute to their persistence in the environment and may play an important role in dissemination [61,62,63]. Our results support the hypothesis that adaptation to amoeba drives selection of multiple phenotypic traits which improved fitness and increased colonisation in a higher eukaryotic host. Surprisingly, point mutations in a single gene, flrA, associated with regulation of flagella, recapitulated the changes in phenotypes observed in adapted isolates as well as in colonisation of zebrafish. This highlights how predation can select for strains with enhanced capacity to colonise other hosts, which may be the result of only one or two nucleotide changes. Future studies will be needed to identify similar mutations in natural isolates of V. cholerae. However, this study provides a predictive model where increased microbial interaction due to global warming may lead to such outcomes as rises in temperature drives increased microbial abundance and thus Vibrio spp. in the marine environment [64].
A previous study showed that the absence of flrA in V. cholerae leads to colonisation defects in the infant mouse colonisation model, which is the gold standard model for cholera infection [53]. There are also reports showing that virulence factors that are involved in colonisation of zebrafish differ from those that are important in the infant mouse model [48]. Thus, the varied factors important for colonisation in these two model systems might indicate that a trade-off in colonisation factors would lead to increased colonisation of zebrafish while decreasing colonisation in the infant mouse model. This would result in the variants being less successful in the human context while increasing the potential for transmission and dissemination in the environment. Indeed, there have been reports showing predation can lead to decreased virulence [10, 65]. Together these phenotypic and genotypic changes contribute to our understanding of defensive and adaptive mechanisms of V. cholerae exhibits in the environment under predatory pressure.
Data availability
Sequence data generated in this study are available from the NCBI Sequence Read Archive with accession number PRJNA685017.
References
Jürgens K, Matz C. Predation as a shaping force for the phenotypic and genotypic composition of planktonic bacteria. Anton Van Leeuwen. 2002;81:413–34.
Brüssow H. Bacteria between protists and phages: from antipredation strategies to the evolution of pathogenicity. Mol Microbiol. 2007;65:583–9.
Pernthaler J. Predation on prokaryotes in the water column and its ecological implications. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2005;3:537–46.
Matz C, Kjelleberg S. Off the hook–how bacteria survive protozoan grazing. Trends Microbiol. 2005;13:302–7.
Espinoza-Vergara G, Noorian P, Silva-Valenzuela CA, Raymond BBA, Allen C, Hoque MM, et al. Vibrio cholerae residing in food vacuoles expelled by protozoa are more infectious in vivo. Nat Microbiol. 2019;4:2466–74.
Cirillo JD, Falkow S, Tompkins LS. Growth of Legionella pneumophila in Acanthamoeba castellanii enhances invasion. Infect Immun. 1994;62:3254–61.
Rasmussen MA, Carlson SA, Franklin SK, McCuddin ZP, Wu MT, Sharma VK. Exposure to rumen protozoa leads to enhancement of pathogenicity of and invasion by multiple-antibiotic-resistant Salmonella enterica bearing SGI1. Infect Immun. 2005;73:4668–75.
Azumah BK, Addo PG, Dodoo A, Awandare G, Mosi L, Boakye DA, et al. Experimental demonstration of the possible role of Acanthamoeba polyphaga in the infection and disease progression in Buruli Ulcer (BU) using ICR mice. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0172843.
Jansen G, Crummenerl LL, Gilbert F, Mohr T, Pfefferkorn R, Thänert R, et al. Evolutionary transition from pathogenicity to commensalism: global regulator mutations mediate fitness gains through virulence attenuation. Mol Biol Evol. 2015;32:2883–96.
Zhang J, Ketola T, Örmälä-Odegrip A-M, Mappes J, Laakso J. Coincidental loss of bacterial virulence in multi-enemy microbial communities. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e111871.
Ensminger AW, Yassin Y, Miron A, Isberg RR. Experimental evolution of Legionella pneumophila in mouse macrophages leads to strains with altered determinants of environmental survival. PLoS Pathog. 2012;8:e1002731.
Espinoza-Vergara G, Hoque MM, McDougald D, Noorian P. The impact of protozoan predation on the pathogenicity of Vibrio cholerae. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:17.
Faruque SM, Naser IB, Islam MJ, Faruque ASG, Ghosh AN, Nair GB, et al. Seasonal epidemics of cholera inversely correlate with the prevalence of environmental cholera phages. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:1702–7.
Erken M, Lutz C, McDougald D. The rise of pathogens: predation as a factor driving the evolution of human pathogens in the environment. Microb Ecol. 2013;65:860–8.
Abd H, Saeed A, Weintraub A, Nair GB, Sandström G. Vibrio cholerae O1 strains are facultative intracellular bacteria, able to survive and multiply symbiotically inside the aquatic free-living amoeba Acanthamoeba castellanii. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2007;60:33–9.
Van der Henst C, Scrignari T, Maclachlan C, Blokesch M. An intracellular replication niche for Vibrio cholerae in the amoeba Acanthamoeba castellanii. ISME J. 2016;10:897–910.
Vaitkevicius K, Lindmark B, Ou G, Song T, Toma C, Iwanaga M, et al. A Vibrio cholerae protease needed for killing of Caenorhabditis elegans has a role in protection from natural predator grazing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:9280–5.
Noorian P, Hu J, Chen Z, Kjelleberg S, Wilkins MR, Sun S, et al. Pyomelanin produced by Vibrio cholerae confers resistance to predation by Acanthamoeba castellanii. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2017;93:fix147.
Van der Henst C, Vanhove AS, Drebes Dörr NC, Stutzmann S, Stoudmann C, Clerc S, et al. Molecular insights into Vibrio cholerae’s intra-amoebal host-pathogen interactions. Nat Commun. 2018;9:3460.
Matz C, McDougald D, Moreno AM, Yung PY, Yildiz FH, Kjelleberg S. Biofilm formation and phenotypic variation enhance predation-driven persistence of Vibrio cholerae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:16819–24.
Matz C, Jürgens K. High motility reduces grazing mortality of planktonic bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005;71:921–9.
Gonzalez JM, Sherr E, Sherr BF. Differential feeding by marine flagellates on growing versus starving, and on motile versus nonmotile, bacterial prey. Marine Ecol Prog Series. 1993;102:257–67.
Matz C, Boenigk J, Arndt H, Jürgens K. Role of bacterial phenotypic traits in selective feeding of the heterotrophic nanoflagellate Spumella sp. Aquat Microb Ecol. 2002;27:137–48.
Seiler C, van Velzen E, Neu TR, Gaedke U, Berendonk TU, Weitere M. Grazing resistance of bacterial biofilms: a matter of predators feeding trait. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2017;93:fix112.
Paludan-Müller C, Weichart D, McDougald D, Kjelleberg S. Analysis of starvation conditions that allow for prolonged culturability of Vibrio vulnificus at low temperature. Microbiology. 1996;142:1675–84.
Neidhardt FC, Bloch PL, Smith DF. Culture medium for enterobacteria. J Bacteriol. 1974;119:736–47.
O’Toole GA, Pratt LA, Watnick PI, Newman DK, Weaver VB, Kolter R. Genetic approaches to study of biofilms. Methods Enzymol. 1999;310:91–109.
Petersen LM, Tisa LS. Molecular characterization of protease activity in Serratia sp. strain SCBI and its importance in cytotoxicity and virulence. J Bacteriol. 2014;196:3923–36.
Gardel CL, Mekalanos JJ. Alterations in Vibrio cholerae motility phenotypes correlate with changes in virulence factor expression. Infect Immun. 1996;64:2246–55.
Andrews S FastQC: A quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. 2010. http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/.
Deatherage DE, Barrick, JE. Identification of mutations in laboratory-evolved microbes from next-generation sequencing data using breseq. Methods Mol Biol. 2014:165–88.
Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, et al. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol. 2012;1151:165–88.
Di Tommaso P, Moretti S, Xenarios I, Orobitg M, Montanyola A, Chang J-M, et al. T-Coffee: a web server for the multiple sequence alignment of protein and RNA sequences using structural information and homology extension. Nucl Acids Res. 2011;39:W13–7.
Sehnal D, Bittrich S, Deshpande M, Svobodová R, Berka K, Bazgier V, et al. Mol* Viewer: modern web app for 3D visualization and analysis of large biomolecular structures. Nucl Acids Res. 2021;49:W431–7.
Matsuyama BY, Krasteva PV, Baraquet C, Harwood CS, Sondermann H, Navarro MVAS. Mechanistic insights into c-di-GMP–dependent control of the biofilm regulator FleQ from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016;113:E209–18.
Medrano RF, de Oliveira CA. Guidelines for the tetra-primer ARMS-PCR technique development. Mol Biotechnol. 2014;56:599–608.
Horton RM, Hunt HD, Ho SN, Pullen JK, Pease LR. Engineering hybrid genes without the use of restriction enzymes: gene splicing by overlap extension. Gene. 1989;77:61–8.
Meibom KL, Blokesch M, Dolganov NA, Wu CY, Schoolnik GK. Chitin induces natural competence in Vibrio cholerae. Science. 2005;310:1824–7.
Silva ODS, Blokesch M. Genetic manipulation of Vibrio cholerae by combining natural transformation with FLP recombination. Plasmid. 2010;64:186–95.
Gibson DG, Young L, Chuang RY, Venter JC, Hutchison CA 3rd, Smith HO. Enzymatic assembly of DNA molecules up to several hundred kilobases. Nat Methods. 2009;6:343–5.
Lambertsen L, Sternberg C, Molin S. Mini-Tn7 transposons for site-specific tagging of bacteria with fluorescent proteins. Environ Microbiol. 2004;6:726–32.
Mitchell KC, Withey JH. Danio rerio as a native host model for understanding pathophysiology of Vibrio cholerae. Methods Mol Biol. 2018;1839:97–102.
Cheng T, Kam JY, Johansen MD, Oehlers SH. High content analysis of granuloma histology and neutrophilic inflammation in adult zebrafish infected with Mycobacterium marinum. Micron. 2020;129:102782.
Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012;9:676–82.
Vaudaux P, Waldvogel FA. Gentamicin antibacterial activity in the presence of human polymorphonuclear leukocytes. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1979;16:743–9.
Monk IR, Casey PG, Cronin M, Gahan CGM, Hill C. Development of multiple strain competitive index assays for Listeria monocytogenes using pIMC; a new site-specific integrative vector. BMC Microbiol. 2008;8:96.
Manneh-Roussel J, Haycocks JRJ, Magán A, Perez-Soto N, Voelz K, Camilli A, et al. cAMP receptor protein controls Vibrio cholerae gene expression in response to host colonization. mBio. 2018;9:e00966–18.
Runft DL, Mitchell KC, Abuaita BH, Allen JP, Bajer S, Ginsburg K, et al. Zebrafish as a natural host model for Vibrio cholerae colonization and transmission. App Environ Microbiol. 2014;80:1710–7.
Logan SL, Thomas J, Yan J, Baker RP, Shields DS, Xavier JB, et al. The Vibrio cholerae type VI secretion system can modulate host intestinal mechanics to displace gut bacterial symbionts. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2018;115:E3779–E3787.
Hayashi F, Smith KD, Ozinsky A, Hawn TR, Yi EC, Goodlett DR, et al. The innate immune response to bacterial flagellin is mediated by Toll-like receptor 5. Nature. 2001;410:1099–103.
Lovewell RR, Collins RM, Acker JL, O’Toole GA, Wargo MJ, Berwin B. Step-wise loss of bacterial flagellar torsion confers progressive phagocytic evasion. PLoS Pathog. 2011;7:e1002253.
Tsou AM, Zhu J. Quorum sensing negatively regulates hemolysin transcriptionally and posttranslationally in Vibrio cholerae. Infect Immun. 2010;78:461.
Klose KE, Mekalanos JJ. Distinct roles of an alternative sigma factor during both free-swimming and colonizing phases of the Vibrio cholerae pathogenic cycle. Mol Microb. 1998;28:501–20.
Syed KA, Beyhan S, Correa N, Queen J, Liu J, Peng F, et al. The Vibrio cholerae flagellar regulatory hierarchy controls expression of virulence factors. J Bacteriol. 2009;191:6555–70.
Francke C, Groot Kormelink T, Hagemeijer Y, Overmars L, Sluijter V, Moezelaar R, et al. Comparative analyses imply that the enigmatic sigma factor 54 is a central controller of the bacterial exterior. BMC Genom. 2011;12:385.
Bush M, Dixon R. The role of bacterial enhancer binding proteins as specialized activators of σ54-dependent transcription. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2012;76:497–529.
Srivastava D, Hsieh M-L, Khataokar A, Neiditch MB, Waters CM. Cyclic di-GMP inhibits Vibrio cholerae motility by repressing induction of transcription and inducing extracellular polysaccharide production. Mol Microbiol. 2013;90:1262–76.
Watnick PI, Lauriano CM, Klose KE, Croal L, Kolter R. The absence of a flagellum leads to altered colony morphology, biofilm development and virulence in Vibrio cholerae O139. Mol Microbiol. 2001;39:223–35.
Zhu J, Miller MB, Vance RE, Dziejman M, Bassler BL, Mekalanos JJ. Quorum-sensing regulators control virulence gene expression in Vibrio cholerae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:3129–34.
Liu Z, Miyashiro T, Tsou A, Hsiao A, Goulian M, Zhu J. Mucosal penetration primes Vibrio cholerae for host colonization by repressing quorum sensing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:9769.
Halpern M, Izhaki I. Fish as hosts of Vibrio cholerae. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:282.
Hossain ZZ, Farhana I, Tulsiani SM, Begum A, Jensen PKM. Transmission and toxigenic potential of Vibrio cholerae in Hilsha fish (Tenualosa ilisha) for human consumption in Bangladesh. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:222.
Hounmanou YMG, Mdegela RH, Dougnon TV, Madsen H, Withey JH, Olsen JE, et al. Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) as a putative reservoir host for survival and transmission of Vibrio cholerae O1 biotype El Tor in the aquatic environment. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:1215.
Turner JW, Malayil L, Guadagnoli D, Cole D, Lipp EK. Detection of Vibrio parahaemolyticus, Vibrio vulnificus and Vibrio cholerae with respect to seasonal fluctuations in temperature and plankton abundance. Environ Microbiol. 2014;16:1019–28.
Friman VP, Buckling A. Phages can constrain protist predation-driven attenuation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa virulence in multienemy communities. ISME J. 2014;8:1820–30.
Acknowledgements
We thank Prof. Garry Myers, A/Prof. Iain Duggin and Dr. Shuyang Sun for their valuable suggestions. We also thank the Centenary imaging facility core staff Dr. Angela Kurz for maintenance of the Leica DM6000B microscope. This work was supported by Australian Research Council Discovery Project DP170100453. This project was also funded by the University of Technology Sydney and by the National Research Foundation and Ministry of Education Singapore under its Research Centre of Excellence Programme to the Singapore Centre for Environmental Life Sciences Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, The University of Sydney Fellowship G197581 and the NSW Ministry of Health under the NSW Health Early-Mid Career Fellowships Scheme H18/31086 to SHO. We are thankful to UTS high performance computing facility iHPC for data analysis.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
MMH, PN, GEV, MHR, ML, SAR, SHO and DM designed the study, analysed and interpreted the data. MMH performed the experiments. MK and MP assisted with SEM imaging, MMH, PMC and SHO carried out the fish infection assay. MMH and DM wrote the paper. SAR, SHO and DM provided funding. All authors reviewed and provided critical feedback of the paper.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Hoque, M.M., Noorian, P., Espinoza-Vergara, G. et al. Adaptation to an amoeba host drives selection of virulence-associated traits in Vibrio cholerae. ISME J 16, 856–867 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-021-01134-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-021-01134-2