Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Neurological recovery rate and predictive factors of incomplete AIS grade C spinal cord injury in the older aged population

Abstract

Study design

Retrospective cohort study.

Objectives

To define the prognosis and predictive factors for neurological improvement in older patients with incomplete spinal cord injury (SCI) of American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale grade C (AIS-C).

Settings

Multi-institutions in Japan.

Methods

We included patients aged ≥65 years with traumatic SCI of AIS-C who were treated conservatively or surgically with >3 follow-up months. To identify factors related to neurological improvement, patients were divided into three groups according to their neurological status at the final follow-up, with univariate among-group comparisons of demographics, radiographic, and therapeutic factors. Significant variables were included in the multivariate logistic regression analysis.

Results

Overall, 296 older patients with SCI of AIS-C on admission were identified (average age: 75.2 years, average follow-up: 18.7 months). Among them, 190 (64.2%) patients improved to AIS-D and 21 (7.1%) patients improved to AIS-E at final follow-up. There were significant among-group differences in age (p = 0.026), body mass index (p = 0.007), status of pre-traumatic activities of daily living (ADL) (p = 0.037), and serum albumin concentrations (p = 0.011). Logistic regression analysis showed no significant differences in variables in the stratified group of patients who improved to AIS-D. Meanwhile, serum albumin was a significant variable in patients who improved to AIS-E (p = 0.026; OR: 6.20, pre-traumatic ADL was omitted due to data skewness).

Conclusions

Most older patients with incomplete AIS-C SCI demonstrated at least 1 grade of neurological improvement. However, <10% of patients achieved complete recovery. Key predictors of complete recovery were high serum albumin levels on admission and independent pre-traumatic ADL.

Sponsorship

No funding was received for this study.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Final results of neurological improvement.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Biering-Sorensen F, Bickenbach JE, El Masry WS, Officer A, von Groote PM. ISCoS-WHO collaboration. International Perspectives of Spinal Cord Injury (IPSCI) report. Spinal Cord. 2011;49:679–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Singh A, Tetreault L, Kalsi-Ryan S, Nouri A, Fehlings MG. Global prevalence and incidence of traumatic spinal cord injury. Clin Epidemiol. 2014;6:309–31.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. World Health Organization, Ageing and Health. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ageing-and-health.

  4. Miyakoshi N, Suda K, Kudo D, Sakai H, Nakagawa Y, Mikami Y, et al. A nationwide survey on the incidence and characteristics of traumatic spinal cord injury in Japan in 2018. Spinal Cord. 2021;59:626–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fehlings MG, Pedro K, Hejrati N. Management of acute spinal cord injury: where have we been? Where are we now? Where are we going? J Neurotrauma. 2022;39:1591–602.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lenehan B, Street J, Kwon BK, Noonan V, Zhang H, Fisher CG, et al. The epidemiology of traumatic spinal cord injury in British Columbia, Canada. Spine (Philos Pa 1976). 2012;37:321–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. DeVivo MJ, Chen Y. Trends in new injuries, prevalent cases, and aging with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92:332–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Khorasanizadeh M, Yousefifard M, Eskian M, Lu Y, Chalangari M, Harrop JS, et al. Neurological recovery following traumatic spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurosurg Spine. 2019;1–17.

  9. Kirshblum S, Snider B, Eren F, Guest J. Characterizing natural recovery after traumatic spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma. 2021;38:1267–84.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Nakajima H, Yokogawa N, Sasagawa T, Ando K, Segi N, Watanabe K, et al. Prognostic factors for cervical spinal cord injury without major bone injury in elderly patients. J Neurotrauma. 2022;39:658–66.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Hendey GW, Wolfson AB, Mower WR, Hoffman JR, National Emergency XRUSG. Spinal cord injury without radiographic abnormality: results of the National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study in blunt cervical trauma. J Trauma. 2002;53:1–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bono CM, Schoenfeld A, Gupta G, Harrop JS, Anderson P, Patel AA, et al. Reliability and reproducibility of subaxial cervical injury description system: a standardized nomenclature schema. Spine (Philos Pa 1976). 2011;36:E1140–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fawcett JW, Curt A, Steeves JD, Coleman WP, Tuszynski MH, Lammertse D, et al. Guidelines for the conduct of clinical trials for spinal cord injury as developed by the ICCP panel: spontaneous recovery after spinal cord injury and statistical power needed for therapeutic clinical trials. Spinal Cord. 2007;45:190–205.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tsuji O, Suda K, Michikawa T, Takahata M, Ozaki M, Konomi T, et al. Risk factors of AIS C incomplete cervical spinal cord injury for poor prognosis-The significance of anorectal evaluation. J Orthop Sci. 2023;28:1227–33.

  15. Sadeghi-Naini M, Yousefifard M, Ghodsi Z, Azarhomayoun A, Kermanian F, Golpayegani M, et al. In-hospital mortality rate in subaxial cervical spinal cord injury patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2023;165:2675–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yokogawa N, Kato S, Sasagawa T, Hayashi H, Tsuchiya H, Ando K, et al. Differences in clinical characteristics of cervical spine injuries in older adults by external causes: a multicenter study of 1512 cases. Sci Rep. 2022;12:15867.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Hirota R, Terashima Y, Ohnishi H, Yamashita T, Yokogawa N, Sasagawa T et al. Prognostic Factors for Respiratory Dysfunction for Cervical Spinal Cord Injury and/or Cervical Fractures in Elderly Patients: A Multicenter Survey. Global Spine J. 2024;14:101–12.

  18. Subramaniam S, Aalberg JJ, Soriano RP, Divino CM. New 5-factor modified frailty index using american college of surgeons NSQIP Data. J Am Coll Surg. 2018;226:173–181 e8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Segi N, Nakashima H, Machino M, Ito S, Yokogawa N, Sasagawa T et al. Prognosis of cervical diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis-related spine injuries in elderly patients: analyses of both fracture and spinal cord injury without fracture. Global Spine J. 21925682231186757. Online ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682231186757 (2023).

  20. Kirshblum SC, Burns SP, Biering-Sorensen F, Donovan W, Graves DE, Jha A, et al. International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury (revised 2011). J Spinal Cord Med. 2011;34:535–46.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Kompaniyets L, Freedman DS, Belay B, Pierce SL, Kraus EM, Blanck HM, et al. Probability of 5% or Greater Weight Loss or BMI Reduction to Healthy Weight Among Adults With Overweight or Obesity. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6:e2327358.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Kawano O, Ueta T, Shiba K, Iwamoto Y. Outcome of decompression surgery for cervical spinal cord injury without bone and disc injury in patients with spinal cord compression: a multicenter prospective study. Spinal Cord. 2010;48:548–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mazaki T, Ito Y, Sugimoto Y, Koshimune K, Tanaka M, Ozaki T. Does laminoplasty really improve neurological status in patients with cervical spinal cord injury without bone and disc injury? A prospective study about neurological recovery and early complications. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2013;133:1401–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hachem LD, Zhu M, Aarabi B, Davies B, DiGiorgio A, Evaniew N, et al. A Practical classification system for acute cervical spinal cord injury based on a three-phased modified delphi process from the AOSpine Spinal Cord Injury Knowledge Forum. Global Spine J 2024;14:535–45.

  25. Neal CJ, Ugiliweneza B, Toups EG, Abd-El-Barr M, Jimsheleishvili G, Kurpad SN, et al. Variability in early surgery for acute cervical spinal cord injury patients: an opportunity for enhanced care delivery. J Neurotrauma. 2023;40:1907–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Farkas GJ, Pitot MA, Berg AS, Gater DR. Nutritional status in chronic spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Spinal Cord. 2019;57:3–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Payne L, Harris P, Ghio D, Slodkowska-Barabasz J, Sutcliffe M, Kelly J, et al. Beliefs about inevitable decline among home-living older adults at risk of malnutrition: a qualitative study. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2020;33:841–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Darwono B, Tamai K, Cote P, Aleissa S, Rahim AH, Pereira P, et al. SPINE20 recommendations 2022: spine care-working together to recover stronger. Eur Spine J. 2022;31:3262–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Burgos R, Breton I, Cereda E, Desport JC, Dziewas R, Genton L, et al. ESPEN guideline clinical nutrition in neurology. Clin Nutr. 2018;37:354–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the collection of clinical data. KT and HT led the drafting of this manuscript in collaboration with other authors. SK, GI, KA, HN, TK, TF, and KW closely revised many sections. All authors contributed to all sections of the manuscript and edited it for key intellectual content. All other authors have read and provided substantive intellectual comments to the draft and have approved the final version of the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Koji Tamai.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethical approval

The institutional review board of the representative facility reviewed and approved this study (Institutional Review Board of Kanazawa University, No. 3352-1).

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tamai, K., Terai, H., Nakamura, H. et al. Neurological recovery rate and predictive factors of incomplete AIS grade C spinal cord injury in the older aged population. Spinal Cord 62, 149–155 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-024-00963-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-024-00963-0

Search

Quick links