Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Penetrating spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical features and treatment outcomes

Abstract

Objective

To systematically review the literature on penetrating spinal cord injury (PSCI) and evaluate current management strategies, their impact on patient functional outcomes, and treatment complications.

Methods

PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane were searched based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic-Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to include studies on penetrating spinal cord injury (PSCI).

Results

We included 10 articles comprising 1754 cases of PSCI. Mean age was 19.2 years (range, 16–70), and most patients were male (89.9%). Missile spinal cord injury (MSCI) was the most common type, affecting 1623 patients (92.6%), while non-missile spinal cord injury (NMSCI) accounted for only 131 cases (7.4%). Gunshots were the most common cause of MSCI, representing 87.2%, while knife stabs were the most common cause of NMSCI, representing 72.5%. A total of 425 patients (28.0%) underwent surgical intervention, and 1094 (72.0%) underwent conservative management. The conservative group had a higher rate of complete spine cord injury compared with the surgical group (61.5% vs. 49.2; p < 0.001). Although surgery yielded a higher score improvement rate compared with the conservative management (41.5% vs. 20.5%, p < 0.001), neither treatment strategy displayed superiority in improving neurological outcomes for neither complete SCIs (OR:0.7, 95% CI, 0.3–1.64; I2 = 44%, p = 0.13) nor for incomplete SCIs (OR:1.15, 95% CI, 0.64–2,06; I2 = 40%, p = 0.12).

Conclusion

Surgical and conservative management strategies proved to be equally effective on PSCI, irrespective of injury severity. Therefore, tailored treatment strategies for each patient and careful surgical selection is advised.

This is a preview of subscription content

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: PRISMA flowchart of the search strategy.
Fig. 2: Bar chart comparing ASIA score at admission and discharge between the treatment modalities.
Fig. 3

Data availability

Data were generated using the included articles’ reported data. Data are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Morrow KD, Podet AG, Spinelli CP, Lasseigne LM, Crutcher CL, Wilson JD, et al. A case series of penetrating spinal trauma: Comparisons to blunt trauma, surgical indications, and outcomes. Neurosurg Focus. 2019;46:E4. https://doi.org/10.3171/2018.12.FOCUS18577.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Pedram H, Reza ZM, Reza RM, Vaccaro AR, Vafa RM. Spinal fractures resulting from traumatic injuries. Chin J Traumatol. 2010;13:3–9. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1008-1275.2010.01.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Seroto PM, Harrington BM, Lombard C, Vlok AJ. The role of tertiary neurosurgical intervention in non-missile penetrating injuries of the spine. Eur Spine J. 2021;30:1397–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hurlbert RJ. Editorial. penetrating spinal trauma: snapshot of the American epidemic. Neurosurg Focus FOC. 2019;46:E5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Blair JA, Possley DR, Petfield JL, Schoenfeld AJ, Lehman RA, Hsu JR, et al. Military penetrating spine injuries compared with blunt. Spine J. 2012;12:762–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Iqbal N, Sharif S, Hafiz M, Ullah Khan A. Gunshot spinal injury: factors determining treatment and outcome. World Neurosurg. 2018;114:e706–e712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Roach MJ, Chen Y, Kelly ML. Comparing blunt and penetrating trauma in spinal cord injury: analysis of long-term functional and neurological outcomes. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2018;24:121–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Scientific, Educational Abstracts, and Case-of-the-Day Presented at the ASER 2014 Annual Scientific Meeting and Postgraduate Course September 10–13, Portland, Oregon. Emerg Radiol. 2014;21:431–71.

  9. Klimo PJ, Ragel BT, Rosner M, Gluf W, McCafferty R. Can surgery improve neurological function in penetrating spinal injury? a review of the military and civilian literature and treatment recommendations for military neurosurgeons. Neurosurg Focus. 2010;28:E4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gheban BA, Rosca IA, Crisan M. The morphological and functional characteristics of the pineal gland. Med Pharm Rep. 2019;92:226–34.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71.

  12. Joanna Briggs Institute Case Series. Checklist for Case Series. Joanna Briggs Inst. Crit. Apprais. tools use JBI Syst. Rev. 2017; 1–6.

  13. Howick J, Chalmers I, Glasziou P, Greenhalgh T, Heneghan C, Liberati A, et al. The Oxford 2011 Levels of Evidence. Oxford Centre Evidence-Based Medicine. 2011.

  14. Abbas A, Aziz HF, Rizvi R, Rehaman L, Javeed F, Afzal A, et al. Gunshot acquired spinal cord injury in civilians. Turk Neurosurg. 2019;29:506–12.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kelly ML, Roach MJ, Nemunaitis G, Chen Y. Surgical and Nonsurgical Treatment of Penetrating Spinal Cord Injury: Analysis of Long-term Neurological and Functional Outcomes. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2019;25:186–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Waters RL, Sie I, Adkins RH, Yakura JS. Motor recovery following spinal cord injury caused by stab wounds: A multicenter study. Paraplegia. 1995;33:98–101.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Benzel EC, Hadden TA, Coleman JE. Civilian gunshot wounds to the spinal cord and cauda equina. Neurosurgery. 1987;20:281–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Robertson DP, Simpson RK. Penetrating injuries restricted to the cauda equina: a retrospective review. Neurosurgery. 1992;31:265–70.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Aarabi B, Alibaii E, Taghipur M, Kamgarpur A. Comparative study of functional recovery for surgically explored and conservatively managed spinal cord missile injuries. Neurosurgery. 1996;39:1133–40.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kahraman S, Gonul E, Kayali H, Sirin S, Duz B, Beduk A, et al. Retrospective analysis of spinal missile injuries. Neurosurg Rev. 2004;27:42–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bhatoe HS, Singh P. Missile injuries of the spine. Neurol India. 2003;51:507–11.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Rathore FA, Ayub A, Farooq S, New PW. Suicide bombing as an unusual cause of spinal cord injury: a case series from Pakistan. Spinal Cord. 2011;49:851–4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Crutcher CL II, Wilson JM, DiGiorgio AM, Fannin ES, Shields JA, Morrow KD, et al. Minimally invasive management of civilian gunshot wounds to the lumbar spine: A case series and technical report. Oper Neurosurg. 2020;19:219–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Heary RF, Vaccaro AR, Mesa JJ, Balderston RA. Thoracolumbar infections in penetrating injuries to the spine. Orthop Clin North Am. 1996;27:69–81.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Platt A, Dafrawy MH EL, Lee MJ, H Herman M, Ramos E, et al. Gunshot Wounds to the Lumbosacral Spine: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Glob spine J. 2021;21925682211030870. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34275384/

  26. Khorasanizadeh M, Yousefifard M, Eskian M, Lu Y, Chalangari M, Harrop JS, et al. Neurological recovery following traumatic spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurosurg Spine 2019;30:683–99.

  27. Bumpass DB, Buchowski JM, Park A, Gray BL, Agarwal R, Baty J, et al. An Update on Civilian Spinal Gunshot Wounds: Treatment, Neurological Recovery, and Complications. Spine. 2015;40:450–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Bono CM, Heary RF. Gunshot wounds to the spine. Spine J. 2004;4:230–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lawless MH, Lytle EJ, McGlynn AF, Engler JA. Surgical management of penetrating spinal cord injury primarily due to shrapnel and its effect on neurological outcome: a literature review and meta-analysis. J Neurosurg Spine. 2018;28:63–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ahuja CS, Wilson JR, Nori S, Kotter MRN, Druschel C, Curt A, et al. Traumatic spinal cord injury. Nat Rev Dis Prim. 2017;3:17018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Schwartz G, Fehlings MG. Secondary injury mechanisms of spinal cord trauma: a novel therapeutic approach for the management of secondary pathophysiology with the sodium channel blocker riluzole. Prog Brain Res. 2002;137:177–90.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Badhiwala JH, Ahuja CS, Fehlings MG. Time is spine: a review of translational advances in spinal cord injury. J Neurosurg Spine. 2018;30:1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Choo AM, Liu J, Lam CK, Dvorak M, Tetzlaff W, Oxland TR, et al. Contusion, dislocation, and distraction: primary hemorrhage and membrane permeability in distinct mechanisms of spinal cord injury. J Neurosurg Spine. 2007;6:255–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. LaPlaca MC, Simon CM, Prado GR, Cullen DK. CNS injury biomechanics and experimental models. Prog Brain Res. 2007;161:13–26.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Li S, Mealing GA, Morley P, Stys PK. Novel injury mechanism in anoxia and trauma of spinal cord white matter: glutamate release via reverse Na+-dependent glutamate transport. J Neurosci. 1999;19:RC16.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Kwon BK, Tetzlaff W, Grauer JN, Beiner J, Vaccaro AR. Pathophysiology and pharmacologic treatment of acute spinal cord injury. Spine J. 2004;4:451–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Cafferty WBJ, Duffy P, Huebner E, Strittmatter SM. MAG and OMgp synergize with Nogo-A to restrict axonal growth and neurological recovery after spinal cord trauma. J Neurosci. 2010;30:6825–37.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Chen MS, Huber AB, van der Haar ME, Frank M, Schnell L, Spillmann AA, et al. Nogo-A is a myelin-associated neurite outgrowth inhibitor and an antigen for monoclonal antibody IN-1. Nature. 2000;403:434–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Stefanopoulos PK, Soupiou OT, Pazarakiotis VC, Filippakis K. Wound ballistics of firearm-related injuries—part 2: mechanisms of skeletal injury and characteristics of maxillofacial ballistic trauma. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015;44:67–78.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. The study idea was proposed by [Othman Bin Alamer, MBBS] and [Ali S. Haider, BS]. The literature search, articles screen, and data extraction were perfumed by [Caren Stuebe, MSc], [Paolo Palmisciano, MD], [Lokeshwar S. Bhenderu, BS], [Navraj S. Sagoo, MD], [Maryam Haider, MD], and [Ali S. Haider, BS]. Data analysis was performed by [Othman Bin Alamer, MBBS]. The manuscript was drafted by [Othman Bin Alamer, MBBS]. All authors critically revised and edited the first draft and commented on all versions of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Othman Bin-Alamer.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bin-Alamer, O., Bhenderu, L.S., Stuebe, C. et al. Penetrating spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical features and treatment outcomes. Spinal Cord (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-022-00813-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-022-00813-x

Search

Quick links