SCI & Exercise

Locomotor training in people with spinal cord injury: is this exercise?

Abstract

Locomotor training holds tremendous appeal to people with spinal cord injury who are wheelchair dependent, as the reacquisition of gait remains one of the most coveted goals in this population. For the last few decades this type of training has remained primarily in the clinical environment, as it requires the use of expensive treadmills with bodyweight support or complex overhead suspension tracks to facilitate overground walking. The development of powered exoskeletons has taken locomotor training out of the clinic, both improving accessibility and providing a potential option for community ambulation in people with lower limb paralysis. A question that has yet to be answered, however, is whether or not locomotor training offers a sufficiently intense stimulus to induce improvements in fitness or health. As inactivity-related secondary health complications are a major source of morbidity and mortality in people with SCI, it would be important to characterize the potential of locomotor training to not only improve functional walking ability, but also improve health-related fitness. This narrative review will summarize the key literature in this area to determine whether locomotor training challenges the cardiovascular, muscular or metabolic systems enough to be considered a viable form of exercise.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    Martin Ginis K, van der Scheer J, Latimer-Cheung AE, Barrow A, Bourne C, Carruthers P, et al. Evidence-based scientific exercise guidelines for adults with spinal cord injury: an update and a new guideline. Spinal Cord. 2018;56:308–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Caspersen CJ, Powell KE, Christenson GM. Physical activity, exercise, and physical fitness: definitions and distinctions for health-related research. Public Health Rep. 1985;100:126–31.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Martin Ginis KA, Arbour-Nicitopoulos KP, Latimer AE, Buchholz AC, Bray SR, Craven BC, et al. Leisure time physical activity in a population-based sample of people with spinal cord injury part II: activity types, intensities, and durations. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91:729–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Lai YJ, Lin CL, Chang YJ, et al. Spinal cord injury increases the risk of type 2 diabetes: a population-based cohort study. Spine J. 2014;14:1957–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Myers J, Lee M, Kiratli J. Cardiovascular disease in spinal cord injury: an overview of prevalence, risk, evaluation, and management. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;86:142–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Buchholz AC, Martin Ginis KA, Bray SR, Craven BC, Hicks AL, Hayes KC, et al. Greater daily leisure time physical activity is associated with lower chronic disease risk in adults with spinal cord injury. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2009;34:640–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Ditunno J, Scivoletto G. Clinical relevance of gait research applied to clinical trials in spinal cord injury. Brain Res Bull. 2009;78:35–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Dobkin BH, Duncan PW. Should body weight-supported treadmill training and robotic-assistive steppers for locomotor training trot back to the starting gate? Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012;26:308–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Morawietz C, Moffat F. Effects of locomotor training after incomplete spinal cord injury: a systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94:2297–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Chang SR, Kobetic R, Triolo RJ. Effect of exoskeletal joint constraint and passive resistance on metabolic energy expenditure: Implications for walking in paraplegia. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0183125. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183125.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Ferris DP, Sawicki GS, Daley MA. A physiologist’s perspective on robotic exoskeletons for human locomotion. Int J HR. 2007;4:507–28.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Garber C, Blissmer B, Deschenes M, et al. Quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, and neuromotor fitness in apparently healthy adults: guidance for prescribing exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43:1334–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Fenuta AM, Hicks AL. Metabolic demand and muscle activation during different forms of bodyweight supported locomotion in men with incomplete SCI. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:632765. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/632765.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Israel JF, Campbell DD, Kahn JH, Hornby GT. Metabolic costs and muscle activity patterns during robotic- and therapist-assisted treadmill walking in individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury. Phys Ther. 2006;86:1466–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Escalona MJ, Brosseau R, Vermette M, Comtois AS, Duclos C, Aubertin-Leheudre M, et al. Cardiorespiratory demand and rate of perceived exertion during overground walking with a robotic exoskeleton in long-term manual wheelchair users with chronic spinal cord injury: a cross-sectional study. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2018;61:215–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Evans N, Hartigan C, Kandilakis C, Pharo E, Clesson I. Responses during exoskeleton-assisted walking overground among persons with chronic spinal cord injury. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2015;21:122–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Asselin P, Knezevic S, Kornfeld S, Cirnigliaro C, Agronaova-Breyter PT, Bauman WA, et al. Heart rate and oxygen demand of powered exoskeleton-assisted walking in persons with paraplegia. JRRD. 2015;52:147–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Maher JL, Baunsgaard CB, van Gerven J, Palermo AE, Biering-Sorensen F, Mendez A, et al. Differences in acute metabolic responses to bionic and nonbionic ambulation in spinal cord injured humans and controls. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020;101:121–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Kressler J, Wymer T, Domingo A. Respiratory, cardiovascular and metabolic responses during different modes of overground bionic ambulation in persons with motor-incomplete spinal cord injury: a case series. J Rehabil Med. 2018;50:173–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Currie KD, West CR, Hubli M, Gee CM, Krassioukov AV. Peak heart rates and sympathetic function in tetraplegic nonathletes and athletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015;47:1259–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Borg G. A category scale with ratio properties for intermodal and interindividual comparisons. Psychophysical Judgement and the process of perception. In: Geissler G, Petzol P, editors. Proceedings of the 22nd International Congress of Psychology. Amsterdam: North Holland; 1980. p. 25–34.

  22. 22.

    Gossey-Tolfrey VL, Paulson TA, Tolfrey K, Easton RG. Prediction of peak oxygen uptake from differentiated ratings of perceived exertion during wheelchair propulstion in trained wheelchair sportspersons. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2014;114:1251–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Pelletier CA, Totosy de Zepetnek J, MacDonald M, Hicks A. A 16-week randomized controlled trial evaluating the physical activity guidelines for adults with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2015;53:363–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    van der Scheer JW, Hutchinson M, Paulson T, Martin Ginis KA, Goosey-Tolfrey VL. Reliability and validity of subjective measures of aerobic intensity in adults with spinal cord injury: a systematic review. PMR. 2018;10:194–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Kawashima N, Taguchi D, Nakazawa K, Akai M. Effect of lesion level on the orthotic gait performance in individuals with complete paraplegia. Spinal Cord. 2006;44:487–94.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Kressler J, Nash MS, Burns PA, Field-Fote EC. Metabolic responses to 4 different body weight-supported locomotor training approaches in persons with incomplete spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94:1436–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Gorman PH, Scott W, York H, Theyagaraj M, Price-Miller N, McQuaid J, et al. Robotically assisted treadmill exercise training for improving peak fitness in chronic motor incomplete spinal cord injury: a randomized controlled trial. JSCM. 2016;39:32–44.

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Faulkner J, Martinelli L, Cook K, Stoner L, Ryan-Stewart H, Paine E, et al. Effects of robotic-assisted gait training on the central vascular health of individuals with spinal cord injury: a pilot study. J Spinal Cord Med. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2019.1656849.

  29. 29.

    Gorgey AS, Wade R, Sumrell R, Villadelgado L, Khalil RE, Lavis T. Exoskeleton training may improve level of physical activity after spinal cord injury: a case series. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2017;23:245–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Shackleton C, Evans R, Shamley D, West S, Albertus Y. Effectiveness of over-ground robotic locomotor training in improving walking performance, cardiovascular demands, secondary complications and user satisfaction in individuals with spinal cord injuries: a systematic review. J Rehabil Med. 2019. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-2601.

  31. 31.

    Castro MJ, Apple DF Jr, Staron RS, Campos GE, Dudley GA. Influence of complete spinal cord injury on skeletal muscle within 6 mo of injury. J Appl Physiol. 1999;86:350–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Giangregorio LM, Webber CE, Phillips SM, Hicks AL, Craven BC, Bugaresti JM, et al. Can body weight supported treadmill training increase bone mass and reverse muscle atrophy in individuals with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury? Appl Physiol Nut Metab. 2006;31:283–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Jayaraman A, Shah P, Gregory C, Bowden M, Stevens J, Bishop M, et al. Locomotor training and muscle function after incomplete spinal cord injury: case series. J Spinal Cord Med. 2008;31:185–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Giangregorio LM, Hicks AL, Webber CE, Phillips SM, Craven BC, Bugaresti JM, et al. Body weight supported treadmill training in acute spinal cord injury: impact on muscle and bone. Spinal Cord. 2005;43:649–57.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Karelis AD, Carvalho LP, Escalona MJ, Gagnon DH, Aubertin-Leheudre M. Effect on body composition and bone mineral density of walking with a robotic exoskeleton in adults with chronic spinal cord injury. J Rehabil Med. 2017;49:84–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Stewart BG, Tarnopolsky MA, Hicks AL, McCartney N, Mahoney DJ, Staron RS, et al. Treadmill training-induced adaptations in muscle phenotype in persons with incomplete spinal cord injury. Muscle Nerve. 2004;30:61–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Adams MM, Ditor DS, Tarnopolsky MA, Phillips SM, McCartney N, Hicks AL. The effect of body weight-supported treadmill training on muscle morphology in an individual with chronic, motor-complete spinal cord injury: a case study. J Spinal Cord Med. 2006;29:167–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Piira A, Lannem AM, Sorensen M, Glott T, Knutsen R, Jorgensen L, et al. Robot-assisted locomotor training did not improve walking function in patients with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury: a randomized clinical trial. J Rehabil Med. 2019;51:385–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    van der Scheer JW, Martin Ginis KA, Ditor DS, Goosey-Tolfrey VL, Hicks AL, West CR, et al. Effects of exercise on fitness and health of adults with spinal cord injury. A systematic review. Neurology. 2017;89:736–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Phillips SM, Stewart BG, Mahoney DJ, Hicks AL, McCartney N, Tang JE, et al. Body-weight-support treadmill training improves blood glucose regulation in persons with incomplete spinal cord injury. J Appl Phsiol. 2004;97:716–24.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Jones ML, Evans N, Tefertiller C, Backus D, Sweatman M, Tansey K, et al. Activity-based therapy for recovery of walking in individuals with chronic spinal cord injury: results from a randomized clinical trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95:2239–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Audrey L. Hicks.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hicks, A.L. Locomotor training in people with spinal cord injury: is this exercise?. Spinal Cord (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-020-0502-y

Download citation

Search