Retrospective review of data from a prospective database of a Level 1 trauma center.
This project aims to identify factors collected during the acute and rehabilitative care following a traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) associated with success and failure to return home after inpatient intensive functional rehabilitation (IFR).
Level 1 trauma center specialized in TSCI care in Montreal, Canada.
All eligible patients from our prospective database were separated into two groups according to discharge destination following IFR. Clinical variables collected during the acute and rehabilitative care as well as demographic variables were compared between patients who managed to return home (Group 1) and those who were discharged elsewhere (Group 2). Multivariable regression analyses were conducted with variables that were significant at the univariate level.
Out of the 193 patients included, 22 (11%) failed to return home following IFR. Six variables were associated with failure to return home at the univariate level: longer acute length of stay (LOS), longer rehabilitation LOS, living alone, higher neurological level of injury, having comorbidities, and having a pressure injury (PI) during acute care. Three variables remained significant at the multivariate level: living alone, increasing acute LOS and presenting a high cervical (C1-C4) neurological level of injury.
It is important that acute care clinicians recognize the aforementioned factors early after TSCI in order to optimize patients for community reintegration.
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $24.92 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to the regulations defined by the ethics committee of the CIUSS Nord-de-l’Île-de-Montréal but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
DeVivo MJ, Richards JS. Community reintegration and quality of life following spinal cord injury. Paraplegia. 1992;30:108–12.
Putzke JD, Richards JS. Nursing home residence: quality of life among individuals with spinal cord injury. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;80:404–9.
Silver J, Ljungberg I, Libin A, Groah S. Barriers for individuals with spinal cord injury returning to the community: a preliminary classification. Disabil Health J. 2012;5:190–6.
Smith B, Caddick N. The impact of living in a care home on the health and wellbeing of spinal cord injured people. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015;12:4185–202.
Cheng CL, Plashkes T, Shen T, Fallah N, Humphreys S, O’Connell C, et al. Does specialized inpatient rehabilitation affect whether or not people with traumatic spinal cord injury return home? J Neurotrauma. 2017;34:2867–76.
Munce SE, Wodchis WP, Guilcher SJ, Couris CM, Verrier M, Fung K, et al. Direct costs of adult traumatic spinal cord injury in Ontario. Spinal Cord. 2013;51:64–9.
Whiteneck G, Gassaway J, Dijkers MP, Heinemann AW, Kreider SE. Relationship of patient characteristics and rehabilitation services to outcomes following spinal cord injury: the SCIRehab project. J Spinal Cord Med. 2012;35:484–502.
DeVivo MJ. Discharge disposition from model spinal cord injury care system rehabilitation programs. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80:785–90.
Anzai K, Young J, McCallum J, Miller B, Jongbloed L. Factors influencing discharge location following high lesion spinal cord injury rehabilitation in British Columbia, Canada. Spinal Cord. 2006;44:11–8.
Gour-Provencal G, Mac-Thiong JM, Feldman DE, Begin J, Richard-Denis A. Decreasing pressure injuries and acute care length of stay in patients with acute traumatic spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2020 [Published online ahead of print].
Membres de la Table de réadaptation fonctionnelle intensive de Montréal et du sous-comité sur les soins postaigus de la Table SAPA de Montréal. Programme de soins postaigus et services de rédaptation fonctionnelle intensive pour la clientèle montréalaise. 2017. p. 40.
Baker SP, O’Neill B, Haddon W Jr, Long WB. The injury severity score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care. J Trauma. 1974;14:187–96.
Quan H, Li B, Couris CM, Fushimi K, Graham P, Hider P, et al. Updating and validating the Charlson comorbidity index and score for risk adjustment in hospital discharge abstracts using data from 6 countries. Am J Epidemiol. 2011;173:676–82.
WHO. US National Institute of Aging. Global health and aging. 2011.
Kirshblum S, Waring W 3rd. Updates for the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2014;25:505–17.
Kang MG, Kim CH, Park E, Huh JW, Yang WJ, Nam TW, et al. Effect of family caregiving on depression in the first 3 months after spinal cord injury. Ann Rehabil Med. 2018;42:130–6.
Richard-Denis A, Beausejour M, Thompson C, Nguyen BH, Mac-Thiong JM. Early predictors of global functional outcome after traumatic spinal cord injury: a systematic review. J Neurotrauma. 2018;35:1705–25.
Gulati A, Yeo CJ, Cooney AD, McLean AN, Fraser MH, Allan DB. Functional outcome and discharge destination in elderly patients with spinal cord injuries. Spinal Cord. 2011;49:215–8.
Jain NB, Ayers GD, Peterson EN, Harris MB, Morse L, O’Connor KC, et al. Traumatic spinal cord injury in the United States, 1993-2012. JAMA. 2015;313:2236–43.
We acknowledge the contribution of all team members at the Orthopedics—Spine Research Unit of the Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal. We thank Louis-Félix Gravel (medical student at the University of Montreal) and Ms. Geneviève Leblanc who both assisted in the task of data extraction. We also recognize the important guidance of Dr. Jean Bégin, who provided us with crucial insight for the design of all statistical analyses. Finally, we thank the patients for their essential participation in all our research initiatives.
This research was funded by the Programme d’Excellence en Médecine pour l’Initiation En Recherche, the Fonds de recherche du Québec – Santé, the Praxis Spinal Cord Institute and the Medtronic Research Chair in Spinal Trauma at Université de Montréal.
Conflict of interest
AR-D has received a scholarship and research grants from the Fonds de recherche du Québec – Santé, an investigator-initiated research grant from Medline Industries, and a research grant from Praxis Spinal Cord Institute. J-MM-T is chairholder of the Medtronic research chair in spinal trauma at Université de Montréal, owns stocks and is a board member in Spinologics, and has received a scholarship and research grants from the Fonds de recherche du Québec – Santé, an investigator-initiated research grant from Medline Industries, educational grants from Medtronic and Depuy-Synthes, as well as research grants from the U.S. Department of Defense—Congressionally directed medical research programs, Craig H. Neilsen Foundation, from Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council, Praxis Spinal Cord Institute, and Vertex Pharmaceutical. AD and VL have nothing to disclose.
This study was approved by the “Comité d’éthique de la recherche du CIUSSS du Nord-de-l’Île-de-Montréal” at Hôpital Sacré-Cœur de Montréal. We certify that all applicable institutional and governmental regulations concerning the ethical use of human volunteers were followed during the course of this research.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Dionne, A., Richard-Denis, A., Lim, V. et al. Factors associated with discharge destination following inpatient functional rehabilitation in patients with traumatic spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-020-00542-z