Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Clinical Research
  • Published:

Additional SNPs improve risk stratification of a polygenic hazard score for prostate cancer

Abstract

Background

Polygenic hazard scores (PHS) can identify individuals with increased risk of prostate cancer. We estimated the benefit of additional SNPs on performance of a previously validated PHS (PHS46).

Materials and method

180 SNPs, shown to be previously associated with prostate cancer, were used to develop a PHS model in men with European ancestry. A machine-learning approach, LASSO-regularized Cox regression, was used to select SNPs and to estimate their coefficients in the training set (75,596 men). Performance of the resulting model was evaluated in the testing/validation set (6,411 men) with two metrics: (1) hazard ratios (HRs) and (2) positive predictive value (PPV) of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing. HRs were estimated between individuals with PHS in the top 5% to those in the middle 40% (HR95/50), top 20% to bottom 20% (HR80/20), and bottom 20% to middle 40% (HR20/50). PPV was calculated for the top 20% (PPV80) and top 5% (PPV95) of PHS as the fraction of individuals with elevated PSA that were diagnosed with clinically significant prostate cancer on biopsy.

Results

166 SNPs had non-zero coefficients in the Cox model (PHS166). All HR metrics showed significant improvements for PHS166 compared to PHS46: HR95/50 increased from 3.72 to 5.09, HR80/20 increased from 6.12 to 9.45, and HR20/50 decreased from 0.41 to 0.34. By contrast, no significant differences were observed in PPV of PSA testing for clinically significant prostate cancer.

Conclusions

Incorporating 120 additional SNPs (PHS166 vs PHS46) significantly improved HRs for prostate cancer, while PPV of PSA testing remained the same.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Cumulative incidence curves for PHS166.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data used in this work were obtained from the Prostate Cancer Association Group to Investigate Cancer Associated Alterations in the Genome (PRACTICAL) consortium. Readers who are interested in accessing the data must first submit a proposal to the Data Access Committee. If the reader is not a member of the consortium, their concept form must be sponsored by a principal investigator (PI) of one of the PRACTICAL consortium member studies. If approved by the Data Access Committee, PIs within the consortium, each of whom retains ownership of their data submitted to the consortium, can then choose to participate in the specific proposal. In addition, portions of the data are available for request from dbGaP (database of Genotypes and Phenotypes) which is maintained by the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI): https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gap/?term=Icogs+prostatehttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gap/?term=Icogs+prostate. Anyone can apply to join the consortium. The eligibility requirements are listed here: http://practical.icr.ac.uk/blog/?page_id=9. Joining the consortium would not guarantee access, as a proposal for access would still be submitted to the Data Access Committee, but there would be no need for a separate member sponsor. Readers may find information about application by using the contact information below: Rosalind Eeles Principal Investigator for PRACTICAL Professor of Oncogenetics Institute of Cancer Research (ICR) Sutton, UK Email: PRACTICAL@icr.ac.uk URL: http://practical.icr.ac.uk Tel: ++44 (0)20 8722 4094.

References

  1. Seibert TM, Fan CC, Wang Y, Zuber V, Karunamuni R, Parsons JK, et al. Polygenic hazard score to guide screening for aggressive prostate cancer: Development and validation in large scale cohorts. BMJ. 2018;360:1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Huynh-Le MP, Myklebust TÅ, Feng CH, Karunamuni R, Johannesen TB, Dale AM, et al. Age dependence of modern clinical risk groups for localized prostate cancer—a population-based study. Cancer. 2020;126:1691–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Pashayan N, Duffy SW, Chowdhury S, Dent T, Burton H, Neal DE, et al. Polygenic susceptibility to prostate and breast cancer: Implications for personalised screening. Br J Cancer. 2011;104:1656–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Witte JS. Personalized prostate cancer screening: improving PSA tests with genomic information. Sci Transl Med. 2010;2:1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen H, Liu X, Brendler CB, Ankerst DP, Leach RJ, Goodman PJ, et al. Adding genetic risk score to family history identifies twice as many high-risk men for prostate cancer: Results from the prostate cancer prevention trial. Prostate. 2016;76:1120–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Huynh-Le M-P, Fan CC, Karunamuni R, Thompson WK, Martinez ME, Eeles RA, et al. Polygenic hazard score is associated with prostate cancer in multi-ethnic populations. medRxiv. 2020:1–34.

  7. Schumacher FR, Al Olama AA, Berndt SI, Benlloch S, Ahmed M, Saunders EJ, et al. Association analyses of more than 140,000 men identify 63 new prostate cancer susceptibility loci. Nat Genet. 2018;50:928–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kote-Jarai Z, Easton DF, Stanford JL, Ostrander EA, Schleutker J, Ingles SA, et al. Multiple novel prostate cancer predisposition loci confirmed by an international study: The PRACTICAL consortium. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2008;17:2052–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Eeles RA, Olama AAAl, Benlloch S, Saunders EJ, Leongamornlert DA, Tymrakiewicz M, et al. Identification of 23 new prostate cancer susceptibility loci using the iCOGS custom genotyping array. Nat Genet. 2013;45:385–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Tibshiranit BR. Regression shrinkage and selection via the Lasso. J R Stat Soc B. 1996:267–88.

  11. Tibshirani R. The lasso method for variable selection in the cox model. Stat Med. 1997;16:385–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Mavaddat N, Michailidou K, Dennis J, Lush M, Fachal L, Lee A, et al. Polygenic risk scores for prediction of breast cancer and breast cancer subtypes. Am J Hum Genet. 2019;104:21–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Amos CI, Dennis J, Wang Z, Byun J, Schumacher FR, Gayther SA, et al. The oncoarray consortium: a network for understanding the genetic architecture of common cancers. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2017;26:126–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Eeles R. Prostate cancer genome-wide association study from 89,000 men using the OncoArray chip to identify novel prostate cancer susceptibility loci. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:1525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Karunamuni RA, Huynh-Le MP, Fan CC, Eeles RA, Easton DF, Kote-Jarai ZsS, et al. The effect of sample size on polygenic hazard models for prostate cancer. Eur J Hum Genet. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-020-0664-2.

  16. Li Y, Byun J, Cai G, Xiao X, Han Y, Cornelis O, et al. FastPop: a rapid principal component derived method to infer intercontinental ancestry using genetic data. BMC Bioinforma. 2016;17:1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Heller G. A measure of explained risk in the proportional hazards model. Biostatistics. 2012;13:315–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Prostate Cancer. Version 1.2019.

  19. Therneau TM, Li H. Computing the Cox model for case cohort designs. Lifetime Data Anal. 1999;5:99–112.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Huynh-Le M-P, Fan CC, Karunamuni R, Walsh EI, Turner EL, Lane JA, et al. A genetic risk score to personalize prostate cancer screening, applied to population data. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2020;29:1731–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Prostate Cancer Incidence Statistics Cancer Research UK. https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-statistics/statistics-by-cancer-type/prostate-cancer/incidence#heading-one. Accessed 23 Jul 2020.

  22. Martin RM, Donovan JL, Turner EL, Metcalfe C, Young GJ, Walsh EI, et al. Effect of a low-intensity PSA-based screening intervention on prostate cancer mortality: the CAP randomized clinical trial. J Am Med Assoc. 2018;319:883–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Landrum MJ, Lee JM, Riley GR, Jang W, Rubinstein WS, Church DM, et al. ClinVar: Public archive of relationships among sequence variation and human phenotype. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:980–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Torkamani A, Wineinger NE, Topol EJ. The personal and clinical utility of polygenic risk scores. Nat Rev Genet. 2018;19:581–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Pashayan N, Duffy SW, Neal DE, Hamdy FC, Donovan JL, Martin RM, et al. Implications of polygenic risk-stratified screening for prostate cancer on overdiagnosis. Genet Med. 2015;17:789–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Pashayan N, Pharoah PDP, Schleutker J, Talala K, Tammela TLJ, Määttänen L, et al. Reducing overdiagnosis by polygenic risk-stratified screening: findings from the Finnish section of the ERSPC. Br J Cancer. 2015;113:1086–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang TJ, Larson MG, Levy D, Benjamin EJ, Leip EP, Omland T, et al. Plasma natriuretic peptide levels and the risk of cardiovascular events and death. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:655–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Yang X, Leslie G, Gentry-Maharaj A, Ryan A, Intermaggio M, Lee A, et al. Evaluation of polygenic risk scores for ovarian cancer risk prediction in a prospective cohort study. J Med Genet. 2018;55:546–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Yeh HC, Duncan BB, Schmidt MI, Wang NY, Brancati FL. Smoking, smoking cessation, and risk for type 2 diabetes mellitus: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2010;152:10–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ren S, Xu J, Zhou T, Jiang H, Chen H, Liu F, et al. Plateau effect of prostate cancer risk-associated SNPs in discriminating prostate biopsy outcomes. Prostate. 2013;73:1824–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Forgetta V, Keller-baruch J, Forest M, Durand A, Bhatnagar S, Kemp JP, et al. Development of a polygenic risk score to improve screening for fracture risk: a genetic risk prediction study. PLoS Med. 2020;17:1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Chen T-H, Chatterjee N, Landi MT, Shi J. A penalized regression framework for building polygenic risk models based on summary statistics from genome-wide association studies and incorporating external information. J Am Stat Assoc. 2020;1459:1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Karunamuni R, Huynh-Le M-P, Fan CC, Thompson W, Eeles RA, Kote-Jarai Z, et al. African-specific improvement of a polygenic hazard score for age at diagnosis of prostate cancer. International Journal of Cancer. 2021;148:99–105.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. McNeish DM. Using Lasso for predictor selection and to assuage overfitting: a method long overlooked in behavioral sciences. Multivar Behav Res. 2015;50:471–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was funded in part by a grant from the United States National Institute of Health/National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (#K08EB026503), the University of California Cancer Research Coordinating Committee (#C21CR2060), the Research Council of Norway (#223273), KG Jebsen Stiftelsen, and South East Norway Health Authority.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Roshan A. Karunamuni or Tyler M. Seibert.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare no personal or financial conflicts of interest for the submitted work except as follows. CCF is a scientific consultant for CorTechs Labs, Inc. RE reports honorarium as a speaker for GU-ASCO meeting in San Francisco Jan 2016, support from Janssen, and honorarium as speaker for RMH-FR meeting Nov 2017. She reports honorarium as a speaker at the University of Chicago invited talk May 2018, and an educational honorarium by Bayer & Ipsen to attend GU Connect “Treatment sequencing for mCRPC patients within the changing landscape of mHSPC” at ESMO Barcelona, Sep 2019. She reports member of external Expert Committee on the Prostate Dx Advisory Panel. OAA received speaker’s honorarium from Lundbeck, and is a consultant for Healthlytix. AMD reports that he was a founder and holds equity in CorTechs Labs Inc., and serves on its Scientific Advisory Board. He is a member of the Scientific Advisory Board of Human Longevity, Inc., and the Mohn Medical Imaging and Visualization Centre. He received funding through research grants from GE Healthcare to UCSD. The terms of these arrangements have been reviewed by and approved by UCSD in accordance with its conflict of interest policies. TMS reports honoraria, outside of the present work, from: University of Rochester, Varian Medical Systems, Multimodal Imaging Servcies Corporation; and WebMD. He reports research funding from NIH/NBIB, U.S. Department of Defense, Radiological Society of North America, American Society for Radiation Oncology, and Varian Medical Systems.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Karunamuni, R.A., Huynh-Le, MP., Fan, C.C. et al. Additional SNPs improve risk stratification of a polygenic hazard score for prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 24, 532–541 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41391-020-00311-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41391-020-00311-2

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links