Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Population Study Article
  • Published:

Etiological subgroups of term small-for-gestational-age and childhood health outcomes

Abstract

Background

Small-for-gestational-age (SGA) has a heterogeneous etiology. Our study aimed to examine the childhood health outcomes of etiology-distinct term SGA subgroups.

Methods

Data from the Collaborative Perinatal Project were used. The etiological factors of SGA were categorized into five groups: maternal, fetal, placental, environmental and physiological factors. Primary child outcomes included low IQ and growth restriction. A total of 8417 term infants were eligible.

Results

Compared with AGA, SGA children due to fetal factors had the highest risk of low IQ (aOR = 1.94, 95% CI: 1.45–2.59). SGA infants due to physiological factors had the highest risk of growth restriction (aOR = 6.04, 95% CI: 3.93–9.27). SGA children had a higher risk of growth restriction with the aOR ranging from 3.05 (95% CI: 2.36–3.96) to 5.77 (95% CI: 4.29–7.75) for the number of risk factors that the SGA infants had from 1 to 5. SGA children with any risk factor were associated with a higher risk of lower IQ with the aOR ranging from 1.59 (95% CI: 1.31–1.94) to 1.96 (95% CI: 1.50–2.55). SGA without the five types of etiologies was not associated with adverse child outcomes except for growth restriction (aOR = 3.82, 95% CI: 2.62–5.55).

Conclusion

Term SGA of different etiologies may lead to different child health outcomes.

Impact

  • Our study found that SGA of different etiologies may lead to different child health outcomes.

  • Compared with AGA, SGA children due to fetal factors had the highest risk of low IQ. SGA infants due to physiological factors had the highest risk of growth restriction.

  • SGA babies should not be treated the same. In the era of precision medicine, our findings may help pediatricians and parents better manage SGA babies according to different etiologies and the number of risk factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Sample selection.
Fig. 2: Adjusted odds ratios of adverse childhood outcomes in term SGA infant subgroups by etiologic risk factor, compared with AGA children without risk factors in the Collaborative Perinatal Project, 1959–1976.
Fig. 3: Adjusted odds ratios of adverse childhood outcomes in term SGA infants by the number of etiologic risk factors relative to AGA infants without risk factors.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data of the National Collaborative Perinatal Project are available at the U.S. National Archives. Website: https://www.archives.gov/research/electronic-records/nih.html?_ga=2.166691642.504404601.1662257591–537933195.1662257591.

References

  1. Verkauskiene, R., Petraitiene, I. & Albertsson Wikland, K. Puberty in children born small for gestational age. Horm. Res. Paediatr. 80, 69–77 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kozuki, N. et al. Short maternal stature increases risk of small-for-gestational-age and preterm births in low- and middle-income countries: individual participant data meta-analysis and population attributable fraction. J. Nutr. 145, 2542–2550 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Khanam, R. et al. Maternal short stature and under-weight status are independent risk factors for preterm birth and small for gestational age in rural Bangladesh. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 73, 733–742 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. McCowan, L. & Horgan, R. Risk factors for small for gestational age infants. Best. Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 23, 779–793 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Okah, F., Cai, J., Dew, P. & Hoff, G. Risk factors for recurrent small-for-gestational-age birth. Am. J. Perinatol. 27, 1–7 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Betti, M. et al. Neonatal outcome in newborns from mothers with endocrinopathies. Gynecol. Endocrinol. 27, 248–250 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Berghella, V. Maternal-Fetal Evidence Based Guidelines 2nd edn (CRC Press, 2011).

  8. Xie, C. et al. Stunting at 5 years among SGA newborns. Pediatrics 137, e20152636 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hardy, J. B. The Collaborative Perinatal Project: lessons and legacy. Ann. Epidemiol. 13, 303–311 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Naeye, R. L. Effects of maternal cigarette smoking on the fetus and placenta. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 85, 732–737 (1978).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Klebanoff, M. A. The Collaborative Perinatal Project: a 50‐year retrospective. Paediatr. Perinat. Epidemiol. 23, 2–8 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Terry, M. B., Flom, J., Tehranifar, P. & Susser, E. The role of birth cohorts in studies of adult health: the New York Women’s Birth Cohort. Paediatr. Perinat. Epidemiol. 23, 431–445 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Finken, M. J. J. et al. Children born small for gestational age: differential diagnosis, molecular genetic evaluation, and implications. Endocr. Rev. 39, 851–894 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Linde, L. E., Rasmussen, S., Kessler, J. & Ebbing, C. Extreme umbilical cord lengths, cord knot and entanglement: risk factors and risk of adverse outcomes, a population-based study. PLoS One 13, e0194814 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Lei, X. et al. The optimal postnatal growth trajectory for term small for gestational age babies: a prospective cohort study. J. Pediatr. 166, 54–58 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kuczmarski, R. J. et al. CDC growth charts: United States. Adv. Data 1–27 (2000).

  17. Krebs, N. F. et al. Assessment of child and adolescent overweight and obesity. Pediatrics 120(Suppl 4), S193–S228 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gray, K. A. et al. In utero exposure to background levels of polychlorinated biphenyls and cognitive functioning among school-age children. Am. J. Epidemiol. 162, 17–26 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Myrianthopoulos, N. C. & French, K. S. An application of the US Bureau of the Census Socioeconomic Index to a large, diversified patient population. Soc. Sci. Med. (1967) 2, 283–299 (1968).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Saenger, P., Czernichow, P., Hughes, I. & Reiter, E. O. Small for gestational age: short stature and beyond. Endocr. Rev. 28, 219–251 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Willemsen, R., de Kort, S., van der Kaay, D. & Hokken-Koelega, A. Independent effects of prematurity on metabolic and cardiovascular risk factors in short small-for-gestational-age children. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 93, 452–458 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ibáñez, L. et al. Abdominal fat partitioning and high-molecular-weight adiponectin in short children born small for gestational age. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 94, 1049–1052 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kerkhof, G., Breukhoven, P., Leunissen, R., Willemsen, R. & Hokken-Koelega, A. Does preterm birth influence cardiovascular risk in early adulthood? J. Pediatr. 161, 390–396.e391 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lohaugen, G. C. et al. Small for gestational age and intrauterine growth restriction decreases cognitive function in young adults. J. Pediatr. 163, 447–453 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Li, X. et al. Etiological subgroups of small-for-gestational-age: differential neurodevelopmental outcomes. PLoS One 11, e0160677 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Gharib, H. et al. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists Medical Guidelines for clinical practice for growth hormone use in adults and children—2003 update. Endocr. Pract. 9, 64–76 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

All phases of this study were supported by research grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant number 81903323) and Shanghai Municipal Health Commission (Grant number 20194Y0157). All authors have indicated they have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

J.Z. conceptualized and designed the study. F.F. and Y.C. carried out the initial analyses and drafted the initial manuscript. Q.C., J.L., Z.-C.L., F.L., Y.Z. and F.J. critically reviewed the manuscript for important intellectual content. All authors approved the final manuscript as submitted and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jun Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Consent to participate

Anonymized data were used for this study, and the patient consent was not required.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fang, F., Chen, Y., Chen, Q. et al. Etiological subgroups of term small-for-gestational-age and childhood health outcomes. Pediatr Res 94, 378–384 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-022-02412-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-022-02412-1

Search

Quick links