Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Molecular characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients with Neurofibromin 1-altered metastatic colorectal cancer

Abstract

Loss-of-function alterations of Neurofibromin 1 (NF1) activate RAS, a driver of colorectal cancer. However, the clinical implications of NF1 alterations are largely unknown. We performed a comprehensive molecular profiling of NF1-mutant colorectal cancer using data from 8150 patients included in a dataset of commercial CLIA-certified laboratory (Caris Life Sciences). In addition, NF1 expression levels were tested for associations with clinical outcomes using data from 431 patients in the CALGB/SWOG 80405 trial. In the Caris dataset, 2.2% of patients had pathogenic or presumed pathogenic NF1 mutations. NF1-mutant tumors more frequently harbored PIK3CA (25.0% vs. 16.7%) and PTEN mutations (24.0% vs. 4.2%) than wild type tumors. Gene set enrichment analysis revealed that MAPK and PI3K pathway signatures were enriched in NF1-mutant tumors. In the CALGB/SWOG 80405 cohort, low NF1 expression was associated with poor prognosis, and high NF1 expression was associated with better efficacy of cetuximab than bevacizumab. Together, we revealed concurrent genetic alterations in the PI3K pathways in NF1-mutant tumors, suggesting the need to simultaneously block MAPK and PI3K pathways in treatment. The potential of NF1 alteration as a novel biomarker for targeted therapy was highlighted, warranting further investigations in clinical settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Alterations of MAPK and PI3K pathways.
Fig. 2: Gene set enrichment analysis of specific gene sets in RAS-related signaling pathways.
Fig. 3: Kaplan–Meier curves stratified by gene expression and treatment regimen in the CALGB/SWOG 80405 trial.
Fig. 4: Kaplan–Meier curves comparing the Bev and Cet arms in patient subsets according to NF1 expression levels in the CALGB/SWOG 80405 trial.
Fig. 5: Distinct activities of the MAPK and PI3K pathways and suggestive treatment approaches in NF1-mutant (NF1-MT) colorectal cancer.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Markowitz SD, Bertagnolli MM. Molecular origins of cancer: molecular basis of colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:2449–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Moore AR, Rosenberg SC, McCormick F, Malek S. RAS-targeted therapies: is the undruggable drugged? Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2020;19:533–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Van Cutsem E, Cervantes A, Adam R, Sobrero A, Van Krieken JH, Aderka D, et al. ESMO consensus guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol. 2016;27:1386–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sepulveda AR, Hamilton SR, Allegra CJ, Grody W, Cushman-Vokoun AM, Funkhouser WK, et al. Molecular biomarkers for the evaluation of colorectal cancer: guideline from the American Society for Clinical Pathology, College of American Pathologists, Association for Molecular Pathology, and the American Society of Clinical Oncology. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35:1453–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Price TJ, Peeters M, Kim TW, Li J, Cascinu S, Ruff P, et al. Panitumumab versus cetuximab in patients with chemotherapy-refractory wild-type KRAS exon 2 metastatic colorectal cancer (ASPECCT): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, non-inferiority phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:569–79.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bertotti A, Papp E, Jones S, Adleff V, Anagnostou V, Lupo B, et al. The genomic landscape of response to EGFR blockade in colorectal cancer. Nature. 2015;526:263–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Woolston A, Khan K, Spain G, Barber LJ, Griffiths B, Gonzalez-Exposito R, et al. Genomic and transcriptomic determinants of therapy resistance and immune landscape evolution during anti-EGFR treatment in colorectal cancer. Cancer Cell. 2019;36:35–50.e39.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Diez D, Sanchez-Jimenez F, Ranea JA. Evolutionary expansion of the Ras switch regulatory module in eukaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39:5526–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Rad E, Tee AR. Neurofibromatosis type 1: Fundamental insights into cell signalling and cancer. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2016;52:39–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Post JB, Hami N, Mertens AEE, Elfrink S, Bos JL, Snippert HJG. CRISPR-induced RASGAP deficiencies in colorectal cancer organoids reveal that only loss of NF1 promotes resistance to EGFR inhibition. Oncotarget. 2019;10:1440–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Georgiou A, Stewart A, Cunningham D, Banerji U, Whittaker SR. Inactivation of NF1 promotes resistance to EGFR inhibition in KRAS/NRAS/BRAF(V600) -Wild-Type Colorectal Cancer. Mol Cancer Res MCR. 2020;18:835–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Venook AP, Niedzwiecki D, Lenz HJ, Innocenti F, Fruth B, Meyerhardt JA, et al. Effect of first-line chemotherapy combined with cetuximab or bevacizumab on overall survival in patients with KRAS wild-type advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2017;317:2392–401.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Vanderwalde A, Spetzler D, Xiao N, Gatalica Z, Marshall J. Microsatellite instability status determined by next-generation sequencing and compared with PD-L1 and tumor mutational burden in 11,348 patients. Cancer Med. 2018;7:746–56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Magnuson AM, Kiner E, Ergun A, Park JS, Asinovski N, Ortiz-Lopez A, et al. Identification and validation of a tumor-infiltrating Treg transcriptional signature conserved across species and tumor types. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2018;115:E10672–E10681.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wagle MC, Kirouac D, Klijn C, Liu B, Mahajan S, Junttila M, et al. A transcriptional MAPK Pathway Activity Score (MPAS) is a clinically relevant biomarker in multiple cancer types. NPJ Precis Oncol. 2018;2:7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Campbell BB, Light N, Fabrizio D, Zatzman M, Fuligni F, de Borja R, et al. Comprehensive analysis of hypermutation in human cancer. Cell. 2017;171:1042–56.e1010.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Mauri G, Arena S, Siena S, Bardelli A, Sartore-Bianchi A. The DNA damage response pathway as a land of therapeutic opportunities for colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol. 2020;31:1135–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Riaz N, Blecua P, Lim RS, Shen R, Higginson DS, Weinhold N, et al. Pan-cancer analysis of bi-allelic alterations in homologous recombination DNA repair genes. Nat Commun. 2017;8:857.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. de Bruin EC, Cowell C, Warne PH, Jiang M, Saunders RE, Melnick MA, et al. Reduced NF1 expression confers resistance to EGFR inhibition in lung cancer. Cancer Discov. 2014;4:606–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Maertens O, Cichowski K. Paths of resistance to EGFR inhibitors: is NF enough? Cancer Discov. 2014;4:519–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Akbay EA, Koyama S, Carretero J, Altabef A, Tchaicha JH, Christensen CL, et al. Activation of the PD-1 pathway contributes to immune escape in EGFR-driven lung tumors. Cancer Discov. 2013;3:1355–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kumagai S, Koyama S, Nishikawa H. Antitumour immunity regulated by aberrant ERBB family signalling. Nat Rev Cancer. 2021;21:181–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Loi S, Dushyanthen S, Beavis PA, Salgado R, Denkert C, Savas P, et al. RAS/MAPK activation is associated with reduced tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in triple-negative breast cancer: therapeutic cooperation between MEK and PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22:1499–509.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Arai H, Elliott A, Xiu J, Wang J, Battaglin F, Kawanishi N, et al. The landscape of alterations in DNA damage response pathways in colorectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2021;27:3234–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Vidotto T, Melo CM, Castelli E, Koti M, Dos Reis RB, Squire JA. Emerging role of PTEN loss in evasion of the immune response to tumours. Br J Cancer. 2020;122:1732–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all patients who contributed to this study. Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health under Award Numbers U10CA180821 and U10CA180882 (to the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology), UG1CA233163, P30CA 014089 [to H-JL], Gloria Borges WunderGlo Foundation, Dhont Family Foundation, Victoria and Philip Wilson Research Fund, San Pedro Peninsula Cancer Guild, and Daniel Butler Research Fund. Also supported in part by funds from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Genentech, and Pfizer. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

HA and HJL planned, designed, and administered this study. The original draft was written by HA, AE, and HJL. AE, JM, and JZ were responsible for the statistical analysis. JX, FSO and FI contributed to administrative, technical, or material support. JX, JW, FB, PJ, NK, SS, WZ, DS, RMG, MJH, AJS, MK, JJH, EL, BAW, ACL, AFS, JPA, DM, PS, made substantial contributions to data resource, investigations, and manuscript review and editing. APV, WMK, and HJL supervised this study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heinz-Josef Lenz.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

DS reports consulting role for Ability Pharmaceuticals, honoraria from Foundation Medicine, Speakers bureau from Incyte, and research funding at institution from Amgen, Apexigen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, FibroGen, Genentech, Medimmune, Merck, OncoMed, and Rafael. RMG reports consulting/advisory role for Merck, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Merck KGaA and Novartis, research funding from Bristol-Myers Squibb, and travel paid from Merck KGaA and Merck. WMK reports consulting role for Merck. HJL reports a role of advisory board for Merck KG, Merck, Bayer, Roche/Genentech, G1 Therapeutics, Oncocyte, Fulgent, Jazz Therapeutics, and Bicara. AE, JX, JPA, DM, PS, JZ, and WMK are Caris employee. All remaining authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Arai, H., Elliott, A., Millstein, J. et al. Molecular characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients with Neurofibromin 1-altered metastatic colorectal cancer. Oncogene 41, 260–267 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41388-021-02074-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41388-021-02074-z

Search

Quick links