Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Adding dopamine to the complexity of sex differences in opioid reinforcement

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    Han B, Compton WM, Blanco C, Crane E, Lee J, Jones CM. Prescription opioid use, misuse, and use disorders in U.S. adults: 2015 national survey on drug use and health. Ann Int Med. 2017;167:293–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Jones C, Logan J, Gladden R, Bohm M. Vital signs: demographic and substance ause trends among heroin users - United States, 2002-2013. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015;64:719–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Hser Y-I, Anglin MD, Booth MW. Sex differences in addict careers. 3. Addiction. Am J Drug Alcohol Abus. 1987;13:231–51.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Ellinwood EH, Smith WG, Vaillant GE. Narcotic addiction in males and females: a comparison1. Int J Addictions. 1966;1:33–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Lacy RT, Strickland JC, Feinstein MA, Robinson AM, Smith MA. The effects of sex, estrous cycle, and social contact on cocaine and heroin self-administration in rats. Psychopharmacology. 2016;233:3201–10.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Nicolas C, Zlebnik NE, Farokhnia M, Leggio L, Ikemoto S, Shaham Y. Sex differences in opioid and psychostimulant craving and relapse: a critical review. medRxiv. 2021. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.03.30.21254644v1.

  7. 7.

    Galaj E, Xi Z-X. Progress in opioid reward research: From a canonical two-neuron hypothesis to two neural circuits. Pharm Biochem Behav. 2021;200:173072.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Food and Drug Administration. Patient-Focused Drug Development Initiatve (ed Center for Drug Evaluation and Research). US Food and Drug Administration; 2018.

  9. 9.

    Townsend EA, Kim RK, Robinson HL, Marsh SA, Banks ML, Hamilton PJ. Opioid withdrawal produces sex-specific effects on fentanyl-vs.-food choice and mesolimbic transcription. Biol Psychiatry Global Open Science. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpsgos.2021.04.009.

  10. 10.

    Nader MA. Chapter 1 - Animal models for addiction medicine: From vulnerable phenotypes to addicted individuals. In: Hamed E, Martin PP, editors. Prog Brain Res. Elsevier; 2016. p. 3–24.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We appreciate the insightful comments from Drew Townsend on a previous manuscript version.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

HLR and MLB contributed equally to conceptualization, drafting, editing, and finalizing the manuscript. HLR and MLB approved the final manuscript version for publication.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew L. Banks.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Robinson, H.L., Banks, M.L. Adding dopamine to the complexity of sex differences in opioid reinforcement. Neuropsychopharmacol. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-021-01060-z

Download citation

Search

Quick links