Nicotine dependence (trait) and acute nicotinic stimulation (state) modulate attention but not inhibitory control: converging fMRI evidence from Go–Nogo and Flanker tasks

Abstract

Cognitive deficits during nicotine withdrawal may contribute to smoking relapse. However, interacting effects of chronic nicotine dependence and acute nicotine withdrawal on cognitive control are poorly understood. Here we examine the effects of nicotine dependence (trait; smokers (n = 24) vs. non-smoking controls; n = 20) and acute nicotinic stimulation (state; administration of nicotine and varenicline, two FDA-approved smoking cessation aids, during abstinence), on two well-established tests of inhibitory control, the Go–Nogo task and the Flanker task, during fMRI scanning. We compared performance and neural responses between these four pharmacological manipulations in a double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover design. As expected, performance in both tasks was modulated by nicotine dependence, abstinence, and pharmacological manipulation. However, effects were driven entirely by conditions that required less inhibitory control. When demand for inhibitory control was high, abstinent smokers showed no deficits. By contrast, acutely abstinent smokers showed performance deficits in easier conditions and missed more trials. Go–Nogo fMRI results showed decreased inhibition-related neural activity in right anterior insula and right putamen in smokers and decreased dorsal anterior cingulate cortex activity on nicotine across groups. No effects were found on inhibition-related activity during the Flanker task or on error-related activity in either task. Given robust nicotinic effects on physiology and behavioral deficits in attention, we are confident that pharmacological manipulations were effective. Thus findings fit a recent proposal that abstinent smokers show decreased ability to divert cognitive resources at low or intermediate cognitive demand, while performance at high cognitive demand remains relatively unaffected, suggesting a primary attentional deficit during acute abstinence.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Study design.
Fig. 2: Go–Nogo task.
Fig. 3: Flanker task.
Fig. 4: Task maps for the Go–Nogo and Flanker contrasts.
Fig. 5: Group and Nicotine effects on neural activity during the Go-Nogo task.

References

  1. 1.

    Center for Disease Control. Quitting smoking among adults–United States, 2001–2010. MMWR Weekly. 2014;60:1513–19.

  2. 2.

    Powell J, Dawkins L, West R, Powell J, Pickering A. Relapse to smoking during unaided cessation: clinical, cognitive and motivational predictors. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2010;212:537–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-010-1975-8

  3. 3.

    Sutherland MT, Carroll AJ, Salmeron BJ, Ross TJ, Hong LE, Stein Ea. Down-regulation of amygdala and insula functional circuits by varenicline and nicotine in abstinent cigarette smokers. Biol Psychiatry. 2013;74:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2013.01.035

  4. 4.

    Fedota JR, Sutherland MT, Salmeron BJ, Ross TJ, Hong LE, Stein EA. Reward anticipation is differentially modulated by varenicline and nicotine in smokers. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2015;40:2038–46. https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2015.54

  5. 5.

    Rose EJ, et al. Acute nicotine differentially impacts anticipatory valence- and magnitude-related striatal activity. Biol Psychiatry. 2013;73:280–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.06.034

  6. 6.

    Rose EJ, et al. Chronic exposure to nicotine is associated with reduced reward-related activity in the striatum but not the midbrain. Biol Psychiatry. 2012;71:206–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.09.013

  7. 7.

    Ashare RL, Falcone M, Lerman C. Cognitive function during nicotine withdrawal: Implications for nicotine dependence treatment. Neuropharmacology. 2014;76:581–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2013.04.034

  8. 8.

    Ernst M, et al. Effect of nicotine on brain activation during performance of a working memory task. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:4728–33.

  9. 9.

    Goldstein RZ, Volkow ND. Drug addiction and its underlying neurobiological basis: neuroimaging evidence for the involvement of the frontal cortex. Am J Psychiatry. 2002;159:1642–52.

  10. 10.

    Volkow ND, Koob GF, McLellan AT. Neurobiologic advances from the brain disease model of addiction. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:363–71. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1511480

  11. 11.

    Benowitz NL. Nicotine addiction. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:2295–303. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra0809890

  12. 12.

    Lesage E, Stein EA. Networks associated with reward. In: Pfaff DW, ND Volkow ND, editors. Neuroscience in the 21st century. New York, NY: Springer New York; 2016. pp. 1–27.

  13. 13.

    Hahn B. Nicotinic receptors and attention. In: Balfour DJK, Munafò MR, editors. The neurobiology and genetics of nicotine and tobacco. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2015. pp. 103–35.

  14. 14.

    Kalivas PW. The glutamate homeostasis hypothesis of addiction. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009;10:561–72. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2515

  15. 15.

    Koob GF, Volkow ND. Neurocircuitry of addiction. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2010;35:217–38.

  16. 16.

    Rollema H, Coe JW, Chambers LK, Hurst RS, Stahl SM, Williams KE. Rationale, pharmacology and clinical efficacy of partial agonists of alpha4beta2 nACh receptors for smoking cessation. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2007;28:316–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tips.2007.05.003

  17. 17.

    Atzori G, Lemmonds CA, Kotler ML, Durcan MJ, Boyle J. Efficacy of a nicotine (4 mg)-containing lozenge on the cognitive impairment of nicotine withdrawal. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2008;28:667–74. https://doi.org/10.1097/JCP.0b013e31818c9bb8

  18. 18.

    Cahill K, Lindson‐Hawley N, Thomas KH, Fanshawe TR, Lancaster T. Nicotine receptor partial agonists for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006103.pub7

  19. 19.

    Hartmann‐Boyce J, Chepkin SC, Ye W, Bullen C, Lancaster T. Nicotine replacement therapy versus control for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000146.pub5

  20. 20.

    Eriksen BA, Eriksen CW. Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Percept Psychophys. 1974;16:143–9. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203267

  21. 21.

    Luijten M, Machielsen M, Veltman D, Hester R, de Haan L, Franken I. Systematic review of ERP and fMRI studies investigating inhibitory control and error processing in people. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2014;39:149–69. https://doi.org/10.1503/jpn.130052

  22. 22.

    Smith JL, Mattick RP, Jamadar SD, Iredale JM. Deficits in behavioural inhibition in substance abuse and addiction: a meta-analysis. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014;145:1–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.08.009

  23. 23.

    Cieslik EC, Mueller VI, Eickhoff CR, Langner R, Eickhoff SB. Three key regions for supervisory attentional control: Evidence from neuroimaging meta-analyses. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2015;48:22–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.11.003

  24. 24.

    Simmonds DJ, Pekar JJ, Mostofsky SH. Meta-analysis of Go/No-go tasks demonstrating that fMRI activation associated with response inhibition is task-dependent. Neuropsychologia. 2008;46:224–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.07.015

  25. 25.

    Zhang R, Geng X, Lee TMC. Large-scale functional neural network correlates of response inhibition: an fMRI meta-analysis. Brain Struct Funct. 2017;222:3973–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-017-1443-x

  26. 26.

    Luijten M, et al. The role of dopamine in inhibitory control in smokers and non-smokers: a pharmacological fMRI study. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2013;23:1247–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroneuro.2012.10.017

  27. 27.

    Koob GF, Volkow ND. Neurobiology of addiction: a neurocircuitry analysis. Lancet Psychiatry. 2016;3:760–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(16)00104-8

  28. 28.

    Kaufman JN, Ross TJ, Stein EA, Garavan H. Cingulate hypoactivity in cocaine users during a GO-NOGO task as revealed by event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosci. 2003;23:7839–43.

  29. 29.

    Luijten M, Littel M, Franken IHA. Deficits in inhibitory control in smokers during a Go/NoGo task: an investigation using event-related brain potentials. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e18898. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018898

  30. 30.

    Nestor L, McCabe E, Jones J, Clancy L, Garavan H. Differences in ‘bottom-up’ and ‘top-down’ neural activity in current and former cigarette smokers: evidence for neural substrates which may promote nicotine abstinence through increased cognitive control. Neuroimage. 2011;56:2258–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.03.054

  31. 31.

    Buzzell GA, Fedota JR, Roberts DM, McDonald CG. The N2 ERP component as an index of impaired cognitive control in smokers. Neurosci Lett. 2014;563:61–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2014.01.030

  32. 32.

    Carim-Todd L, Mitchell SH, Oken BS. Impulsivity and stress response in nondependent smokers (tobacco chippers) in comparison to heavy smokers and nonsmokers. Nicotine Tob Res. 2016;18:547–56. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntv210

  33. 33.

    Barr RS, et al. The effects of transdermal nicotine on cognition in nonsmokers with schizophrenia and nonpsychiatric controls. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2008;33:480–90. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.npp.1301423

  34. 34.

    Valentine G, Sofuoglu M. Cognitive effects of nicotine: recent progress. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2018;16:403–14. https://doi.org/10.2174/1570159X15666171103152136

  35. 35.

    Foulds J, Stapleton J, Swettenham J, Bell N, McSorley K, Russell MAH. Cognitive performance effects of subcutaneous nicotine in smokers and never-smokers. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1996;127:31–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02805972

  36. 36.

    Heishman SJ, Kleykamp BA, Singleton EG. Meta-analysis of the acute effects of nicotine and smoking on human performance. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2010;210:453–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-010-1848-1

  37. 37.

    Ettinger U, et al. Effects of nicotine on response inhibition and interference control. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2017;234:1093–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-017-4542-8

  38. 38.

    Zelle SL, Gates KM, Fiez JA, Sayette MA, Wilson SJ. The first day is always the hardest: functional connectivity during cue exposure and the ability to resist smoking in the initial hours of a quit attempt. NeuroImage. 2017;151:24–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.03.015

  39. 39.

    Lesage E, Aronson SE, Sutherland MT, Ross TJ, Salmeron BJ, Stein EA. Neural signatures of cognitive flexibility and reward sensitivity following nicotinic receptor stimulation in dependent smokers: a randomized trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2017;74:632–40. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.0400

  40. 40.

    Carroll AJ, Sutherland MT, Salmeron BJ, Ross TJ, Stein EA. Greater externalizing personality traits predict less error-related insula and anterior cingulate cortex activity in acutely abstinent cigarette smokers. Addict Biol. 2015;20:377–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/adb.12118

  41. 41.

    Cox RW. AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. Comput Biomed Res Int J. 1996;29:162–73.

  42. 42.

    Afyouni S, Nichols TE. Insight and inference for DVARS. Neuroimage. 172:291–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.12.098

  43. 43.

    Seeley WW, et al. Dissociable intrinsic connectivity networks for salience processing and executive control. J Neurosci. 2007;27:2349–56. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5587-06.2007

  44. 44.

    Xu M, Xu G, Yang Y. Neural systems underlying emotional and non-emotional interference processing: an ALE meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies. Front Behav Neurosci. 2016. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2016.00220

  45. 45.

    Hahn B, Ross TJ, Wolkenberg FA, Shakleya DM, Huestis MA, Stein EA. Performance effects of nicotine during selective attention, divided attention, and simple stimulus detection: an fMRI study. Cereb Cortex. 2009;19:1990–2000. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhn226

  46. 46.

    Fedota JR, et al. Nicotine abstinence influences the calculation of salience in discrete insular circuits. Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2018;3:150–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpsc.2017.09.010

  47. 47.

    Grundey J, Amu R, Ambrus GG, Batsikadze G, Paulus W, Nitsche MA. “Double dissociation of working memory and attentional processes in smokers and non-smokers with and without nicotine,”. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2015;232:2491–501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-015-3880-7

  48. 48.

    Lawrence NS, Ross TJ, Stein EA. Cognitive mechanisms of nicotine on visual attention. Neuron. 2002;36:539–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(02)01004-8

  49. 49.

    Sutherland MT, Carroll AJ, Salmeron BJ, Ross TJ, Hong LE, Stein EA. Individual differences in amygdala reactivity following nicotinic receptor stimulation in abstinent smokers. Neuroimage. 2013;66:585–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.10.043

  50. 50.

    Kozink RV, Kollins SH, McClernon FJ. Smoking withdrawal modulates right inferior frontal cortex but not presupplementary motor area activation during inhibitory control. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2010;35:2600–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2010.154

  51. 51.

    Weywadt CR, Kiehl KA, Claus ED. Neural correlates of response inhibition in current and former smokers. Behav Brain Res. 2017;319:207–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2016.11.030

  52. 52.

    Rass O, Fridberg DJ, O’Donnell BF. Neural correlates of performance monitoring in daily and intermittent smokers. Clin Neurophysiol. 2014;125:1417–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2013.12.001

  53. 53.

    Fedota JR, Matous AL, Salmeron BJ, Gu H, Ross TJ, Stein EA. Insula demonstrates a non-linear response to varying demand for cognitive control and weaker resting connectivity with the executive control network in smokers. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2016;41:2557–65. https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2016.62

  54. 54.

    Evans DE, Craig C, Oliver JA, Drobes DJ. The smoking N-back: a measure of biased cue processing at varying levels of cognitive load. Nicotine Tob Res. 2011;13:88–93. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntq214

  55. 55.

    Dosenbach NUF, et al. Distinct brain networks for adaptive and stable task control in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:11073–8. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0704320104

  56. 56.

    Eckert MA, et al. At the heart of the ventral attention system: the right anterior insula. Hum Brain Mapp. 2009;30:2530–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20688

  57. 57.

    Yuan K, et al. Striato-cortical tracts predict 12-h abstinence-induced lapse in smokers. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2018;43:2452–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-018-0182-x

  58. 58.

    Bi Y, et al. Altered resting state functional connectivity of anterior insula in young smokers. Brain Imaging Behav. 2017;11:155–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11682-016-9511-z

  59. 59.

    Azizian A, Nestor LJ, Payer D, Monterosso JR, Brody AL, London ED. Smoking reduces conflict-related anterior cingulate activity in abstinent cigarette smokers performing a stroop task. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2010;35:775–82. https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2009.186

  60. 60.

    Nestor L, McCabe E, Jones J, Clancy L, Garavan H. Differences in ‘bottom-up’ and ‘top-down’ neural activity in current and former cigarette smokers: evidence for neural substrates which may promote nicotine abstinence through increased cognitive control. NeuroImage. 2011;56:2258–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.03.054

  61. 61.

    Hester R, Fassbender C, Garavan H. Individual differences in error processing: a review and reanalysis of three event-related fMRI studies using the GO/NOGO task. Cereb Cortex. 2004;14:986–94. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhh059

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. A. Stein.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lesage, E., Sutherland, M.T., Ross, T.J. et al. Nicotine dependence (trait) and acute nicotinic stimulation (state) modulate attention but not inhibitory control: converging fMRI evidence from Go–Nogo and Flanker tasks. Neuropsychopharmacol. 45, 857–865 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-020-0623-1

Download citation