Maintenance of antidepressant and antisuicidal effects by D-cycloserine among patients with treatment-resistant depression who responded to low-dose ketamine infusion: a double-blind randomized placebo–control study

Abstract

Increasing evidence supports a rapid antidepressant and antisuicidal effect of a single subanesthetic dose of ketamine infusion for treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Maintaining the initial clinical response after ketamine infusion in TRD is a crucial next-step challenge. D-cycloserine (DCS), a partial agonist of the glycine co-agonist of the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) glutamate receptor, is potentially effective as a depression augmentation treatment. However, whether DCS maintains the antidepressant and antisuicidal effects of ketamine infusion remains unknown. In all, 32 patients with TRD (17 with major depression and 15 with bipolar depression) who responded to ketamine infusion with an average 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) score of 9.47 ± 4.11 at baseline were randomly divided to 6-week DCS treatment (250 mg for 2 days, 500 mg for 2 days, 750 mg for 3 days, and 1000 mg for 5 weeks) and placebo groups. Depression symptoms were rated at timepoints of dose titration and weekly. During the 6-week treatment, the total scores of HAMD did not differ between the DCS and placebo groups. The results remained consistent when stratified by disorder. A mixed model analysis indicated that the DCS group exhibited lower scores of HAMD item 3 (suicide) compared with the placebo group throughout the follow-up period (p = 0.01). A superior maintenance of the antisuicidal effect of ketamine was observed in the DCS group than in the placebo group. DCS may be therapeutically beneficial for patients with TRD who responded to ketamine infusion but have a residual suicidal risk.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. 1.

    Howland RH. Sequenced treatment alternatives to relieve depression (STAR*D). Part 2: study outcomes. J Psychosoc Nurs Ment health Serv. 2008;46:21–4.

  2. 2.

    Gitlin M. Treatment-resistant bipolar disorder. Mol Psychiatry. 2006;11:227–40.

  3. 3.

    Schoeyen HK, Kessler U, Andreassen OA, Auestad BH, Bergsholm P, Malt UF, et al. Treatment-resistant bipolar depression: a randomized controlled trial of electroconvulsive therapy versus algorithm-based pharmacological treatment. Am J Psychiatry. 2015;172:41–51.

  4. 4.

    Poon SH, Sim K, Sum MY, Kuswanto CN, Baldessarini RJ. Evidence-based options for treatment-resistant adult bipolar disorder patients. Bipolar Disord. 2012;14:573–84.

  5. 5.

    Al-Harbi KS. Treatment-resistant depression: therapeutic trends, challenges, and future directions. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2012;6:369–88.

  6. 6.

    Kishimoto T, Chawla JM, Hagi K, Zarate CA, Kane JM, Bauer M, et al. Single-dose infusion ketamine and non-ketamine N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor antagonists for unipolar and bipolar depression: a meta-analysis of efficacy, safety and time trajectories. Psychol Med. 2016;46:1459–72.

  7. 7.

    Su TP, Chen MH, Li CT, Lin WC, Hong CJ, Gueorguieva R, et al. Dose-related effects of adjunctive ketamine in taiwanese patients with treatment-resistant depression. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2017;42:2482–92.

  8. 8.

    Murrough JW, Iosifescu DV, Chang LC, Al Jurdi RK, Green CE, Perez AM, et al. Antidepressant efficacy of ketamine in treatment-resistant major depression: a two-site randomized controlled trial. Am J Psychiatry. 2013;170:1134–42.

  9. 9.

    Wilkinson ST, Ballard ED, Bloch MH, Mathew SJ, Murrough JW, Feder A, et al. The effect of a single dose of intravenous ketamine on suicidal ideation: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis. Am J Psychiatry. 2018;175:150–8.

  10. 10.

    Iosifescu DV. Maintaining the initial clinical response after ketamine in bipolar and unipolar depression: an important next-step challenge. J Clin Psychiatry. 2015;76:738–40.

  11. 11.

    Krystal JH, Sanacora G, Duman RS. Rapid-acting glutamatergic antidepressants: the path to ketamine and beyond. Biol Psychiatry. 2013;73:1133–41.

  12. 12.

    Heresco-Levy U, Gelfin G, Bloch B, Levin R, Edelman S, Javitt DC, et al. A randomized add-on trial of high-dose D-cycloserine for treatment-resistant depression. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2013;16:501–6.

  13. 13.

    Henter ID, de Sousa RT, Zarate CA, Jr. Glutamatergic modulators in depression. Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2018;26:307–19. https://doi.org/10.1097/HRP.0000000000000183.

  14. 14.

    Heresco-Levy U, Javitt DC, Gelfin Y, Gorelik E, Bar M, Blanaru M, et al. Controlled trial of D-cycloserine adjuvant therapy for treatment-resistant major depressive disorder. J Affect Disord. 2006;93:239–43.

  15. 15.

    Kantrowitz JT, Halberstam B, Gangwisch J. Single-dose ketamine followed by daily D-Cycloserine in treatment-resistant bipolar depression. J Clin Psychiatry. 2015;76:737–8.

  16. 16.

    Teng CT, Demetrio FN. Memantine may acutely improve cognition and have a mood stabilizing effect in treatment-resistant bipolar disorder. Rev Bras Psiquiatr. 2006;28:252–4.

  17. 17.

    Sheehan DV, Lecrubier Y, Sheehan KH, Amorim P, Janavs J, Weiller E, et al. The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. J Clin Psychiatry. 1998;59(Suppl 20):22–33. quiz 34-57.

  18. 18.

    van Belkum SM, Geugies H, Lysen TS, Cleare AJ, Peeters F, Penninx B, et al. Validity of the maudsley staging method in predicting treatment-resistant depression outcome using the Netherlands study of depression and anxiety. J Clin Psychiatry. 2018;79. pii: 17m11475. https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.17m11475.

  19. 19.

    Hamilton M. A rating scale for depression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1960;23:56–62.

  20. 20.

    Girgenti MJ, Ghosal S, LoPresto D, Taylor JR, Duman RS. Ketamine accelerates fear extinction via mTORC1 signaling. Neurobiol Dis. 2017;100:1–8.

  21. 21.

    Danysz W, Parsons CG. Glycine and N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors: physiological significance and possible therapeutic applications. Pharm Rev. 1998;50:597–664.

  22. 22.

    Sheinin A, Shavit S, Benveniste M. Subunit specificity and mechanism of action of NMDA partial agonist D-cycloserine. Neuropharmacology. 2001;41:151–8.

  23. 23.

    Rouaud E, Billard JM. D-cycloserine facilitates synaptic plasticity but impairs glutamatergic neurotransmission in rat hippocampal slices. Br J Pharmacol. 2003;140:1051–6.

  24. 24.

    Billard JM, Rouaud E. Deficit of NMDA receptor activation in CA1 hippocampal area of aged rats is rescued by D-cycloserine. Eur J Neurosci. 2007;25:2260–8.

  25. 25.

    Gupta SC, Hillman BG, Prakash A, Ugale RR, Stairs DJ, Dravid SM. Effect of D-cycloserine in conjunction with fear extinction training on extracellular signal-regulated kinase activation in the medial prefrontal cortex and amygdala in rat. Eur J Neurosci. 2013;37:1811–22.

  26. 26.

    Baker KD, McNally GP, Richardson R. d-Cycloserine facilitates fear extinction in adolescent rats and differentially affects medial and lateral prefrontal cortex activation. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2018;86:262–9.

  27. 27.

    Cherry KM, Lenze EJ, Lang CE. Combining d-cycloserine with motor training does not result in improved general motor learning in neurologically intact people or in people with stroke. J Neurophysiol. 2014;111:2516–24.

  28. 28.

    Gunthner J, Scholl J, Favaron E, Harmer CJ, Johansen-Berg H, Reinecke A. The NMDA receptor partial agonist d-cycloserine does not enhance motor learning. J Psychopharmacol. 2016;30:994–9.

  29. 29.

    Gujral S, Dombrovski AY, Butters M, Clark L, Reynolds CF, 3rd, Szanto K. Impaired executive function in contemplated and attempted suicide in late life. Am J Geriatric Psychiatry. 2014;22:811–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jagp.2013.01.025.

  30. 30.

    Davis M, Ressler K, Rothbaum BO, Richardson R. Effects of D-cycloserine on extinction: translation from preclinical to clinical work. Biol Psychiatry. 2006;60:369–75.

  31. 31.

    Scheeringa MS, Weems CF. Randomized placebo-controlled D-cycloserine with cognitive behavior therapy for pediatric posttraumatic stress. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2014;24:69–77.

  32. 32.

    Andrade C. Ketamine for depression, 4: in what dose, at what rate, by what route, for how long, and at what frequency? J Clin Psychiatry. 2017;78:e852–7.

  33. 33.

    Murrough JW, Perez AM, Pillemer S, Stern J, Parides MK, aan het Rot M, et al. Rapid and longer-term antidepressant effects of repeated ketamine infusions in treatment-resistant major depression. Biol Psychiatry. 2013;74:250–6.

  34. 34.

    Rasmussen KG, Lineberry TW, Galardy CW, Kung S, Lapid MI, Palmer BA, et al. Serial infusions of low-dose ketamine for major depression. J Psychopharmacol. 2013;27:444–50.

  35. 35.

    Phillips JL, Norris S, Talbot J, Birmingham M, Hatchard T, Ortiz A, et al. Single, repeated, and maintenance ketamine infusions for treatment-resistant depression: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Psychiatry. 2019;176:401–9.

  36. 36.

    Shiroma PR, Johns B, Kuskowski M, Wels J, Thuras P, Albott CS, et al. Augmentation of response and remission to serial intravenous subanesthetic ketamine in treatment resistant depression. J Affect Disord. 2014;155:123–9.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We express our gratitude to all patients who kindly participated in this study. We thank all research assistants, physicians, pharmacists, and nursing staffs at D020 Unit of Taipei Veterans General Hospital for their assistance during the study process, without whom this work could not have been possible. We thank Mr I-Fan Hu for his support and friendship. The participation of Dr Krystal was supported by the US Department of Veterans Affairs via its support for the VA National Center for PTSD, the US National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (P50AA12870, M01RR00125), and the US National Center for Advancing Translational Science (UL1 RR024139). None of the aforementioned funding organizations had any role in the study design, data collection, analysis, interpretation of result, writing of the report, and the ultimate decision to submit the paper for publication.

Author information

Correspondence to John H. Krystal or Tung-Ping Su.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark