Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Differential associations of adolescent versus young adult cannabis initiation with longitudinal brain change and behavior

Abstract

Leveraging ~10 years of prospective longitudinal data on 704 participants, we examined the effects of adolescent versus young adult cannabis initiation on MRI-assessed cortical thickness development and behavior. Data were obtained from the IMAGEN study conducted across eight European sites. We identified IMAGEN participants who reported being cannabis-naïve at baseline and had data available at baseline, 5-year, and 9-year follow-up visits. Cannabis use was assessed with the European School Survey Project on Alcohol and Drugs. T1-weighted MR images were processed through the CIVET pipeline. Cannabis initiation occurring during adolescence (14–19 years) and young adulthood (19–22 years) was associated with differing patterns of longitudinal cortical thickness change. Associations between adolescent cannabis initiation and cortical thickness change were observed primarily in dorso- and ventrolateral portions of the prefrontal cortex. In contrast, cannabis initiation occurring between 19 and 22 years of age was associated with thickness change in temporal and cortical midline areas. Follow-up analysis revealed that longitudinal brain change related to adolescent initiation persisted into young adulthood and partially mediated the association between adolescent cannabis use and past-month cocaine, ecstasy, and cannabis use at age 22. Extent of cannabis initiation during young adulthood (from 19 to 22 years) had an indirect effect on psychotic symptoms at age 22 through thickness change in temporal areas. Results suggest that developmental timing of cannabis exposure may have a marked effect on neuroanatomical correlates of cannabis use as well as associated behavioral sequelae. Critically, this work provides a foundation for neurodevelopmentally informed models of cannabis exposure in humans.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Adolescent cannabis use and cortical thickness in young adulthood.
Fig. 2: Longitudinal linear mixed-effects model results for group-level analysis.
Fig. 3: Cortical thickness trajectories from 14 to 22 years of age.
Fig. 4: Cannabis use and cortical thickness in young adulthood (19–22).
Fig. 5: Cannabis and age-related cortical thickness change.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. World drug report 2018. New York, NY: United Nations publication; 2018.

  2. Johnston LD,Miech RA, O’Malley PM, Bachman JG, Schulenberg JE, Patrick ME. Monitoring the future: national survey results on drug use 1975-2018: 2018 overview: key findings on adolescent drug use. Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan. 2019. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED594190.pdf. Accessed 10 May 2021.

  3. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Results from the 2013 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Summary of National Findings. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; 2014.

  4. Morin JG, Afzali MH, Bourque J, Stewart SH, Seguin JR, O’Leary-Barrett M, et al. A Population-Based Analysis of the Relationship Between Substance Use and Adolescent Cognitive Development. Am J Psychiatry. 2019;176:98–106.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chye Y, Christensen E, Yucel M. Cannabis Use in Adolescence: A Review of Neuroimaging Findings. J Dual Diagn. 2020;16:83–105.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lichenstein SD, Manco N, Cope LM, Egbo L, Garrison KA, Hardee J, et al. Systematic review of structural and functional neuroimaging studies of cannabis use in adolescence and emerging adulthood: evidence from 90 studies and 9441 participants. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2022;47:1000–28.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Buckner RL, Krienen FM. The evolution of distributed association networks in the human brain. Trends Cogn Sci. 2013;17:648–65.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ducharme S, Albaugh MD, Nguyen TV, Hudziak JJ, Mateos-Perez JM, Labbe A, et al. Trajectories of cortical surface area and cortical volume maturation in normal brain development. Data Brief. 2015;5:929–38.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Ducharme S, Albaugh MD, Nguyen TV, Hudziak JJ, Mateos-Perez JM, Labbe A, et al. Trajectories of cortical thickness maturation in normal brain development-The importance of quality control procedures. Neuroimage. 2016;125:267–79.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tamnes CK, Herting MM, Goddings AL, Meuwese R, Blakemore SJ, Dahl RE, et al. Development of the Cerebral Cortex across Adolescence: A Multisample Study of Inter-Related Longitudinal Changes in Cortical Volume, Surface Area, and Thickness. J Neurosci. 2017;37:3402–12.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Kolk SM, Rakic P. Development of prefrontal cortex. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2022;47:41–57.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Giedd JN, Rapoport JL. Structural MRI of pediatric brain development: what have we learned and where are we going? Neuron. 2010;67:728–34.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Shaw P, Gilliam M, Liverpool M, Weddle C, Malek M, Sharp W, et al. Cortical development in typically developing children with symptoms of hyperactivity and impulsivity: support for a dimensional view of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Am J Psychiatry. 2011;168:143–51.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Shaw P, Kabani NJ, Lerch JP, Eckstrand K, Lenroot R, Gogtay N, et al. Neurodevelopmental trajectories of the human cerebral cortex. J Neurosci. 2008;28:3586–94.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. O’Shea M, McGregor IS, Mallet PE. Repeated cannabinoid exposure during perinatal, adolescent or early adult ages produces similar longlasting deficits in object recognition and reduced social interaction in rats. J Psychopharmacol. 2006;20:611–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Leweke FM, Schneider M. Chronic pubertal cannabinoid treatment as a behavioural model for aspects of schizophrenia: effects of the atypical antipsychotic quetiapine. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2011;14:43–51.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rubino T, Realini N, Braida D, Alberio T, Capurro V, Vigano D, et al. The depressive phenotype induced in adult female rats by adolescent exposure to THC is associated with cognitive impairment and altered neuroplasticity in the prefrontal cortex. Neurotox Res. 2009;15:291–302.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rubino T, Vigano D, Realini N, Guidali C, Braida D, Capurro V, et al. Chronic delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol during adolescence provokes sex-dependent changes in the emotional profile in adult rats: behavioral and biochemical correlates. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2008;33:2760–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lee HL, Jung KM, Fotio Y, Squire E, Palese F, Lin L, et al. Frequent low-dose Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol in adolescence disrupts microglia homeostasis and disables responses to microbial infection and social stress in young adulthood. Biol Psychiatry. 2022;92:845–60.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Rubino T, Parolaro D. Long lasting consequences of cannabis exposure in adolescence. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2008;286:S108–13.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Albaugh MD, Ottino-Gonzalez J, Sidwell A, Lepage C, Juliano A, Owens MM, et al. Association of Cannabis Use During Adolescence With Neurodevelopment. JAMA Psychiatry. 2021;78:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2022.04.017. [Epub ahead of print].

  22. Owens MM, Albaugh MD, Allgaier N, Yuan D, Robert G, Cupertino RB, et al. Bayesian causal network modeling suggests adolescent cannabis use accelerates prefrontal cortical thinning. Transl Psychiatry. 2022;12:188.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Hibell B, Andersson B, Bjarnason T, Ahlström S, Balakireva O, Kokkevi A, et al. The ESPAD report 2003: alcohol and other drug use among students in 35 european countries. Swedish Council for Information on Alcohol and Other Drugs; 2004. http://www.espad.org/sites/espad.org/files/The_2003_ESPAD_report.pdf.

  24. Shevlin M, Smith GW. The factor structure and concurrent validity of the alcohol use disorder identification test based on a nationally representative UK sample. Alcohol Alcohol. 2007;42:582–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bradley KA, McDonell MB, Bush K, Kivlahan DR, Diehr P, Fihn SD. The AUDIT alcohol consumption questions: reliability, validity, and responsiveness to change in older male primary care patients. Alcoholism Clin Exp Res. 1998;22:1842–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Bush K, Kivlahan DR, McDonell MB, Fihn SD, Bradley KA. The AUDIT alcohol consumption questions (AUDIT-C): an effective brief screening test for problem drinking. Ambulatory Care Quality Improvement Project (ACQUIP). Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test. Arch Int Med. 1998;158:1789–95.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Sobell LC, Toneatto T, Sobell MB, Leo GI, Johnson L. Alcohol abusers’ perceptions of the accuracy of their self-reports of drinking: implications for treatment. Addict Behav. 1992;17:507–11.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Stefanis NC, Hanssen M, Smirnis NK, Avramopoulos DA, Evdokimidis IK, Stefanis CN, et al. Evidence that three dimensions of psychosis have a distribution in the general population. Psychol Med. 2002;32:347–58.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Goodman R. The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: a research note. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1997;38:581–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Goodman R. Psychometric properties of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2001;40:1337–45.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Sherif T, Rioux P, Rousseau ME, Kassis N, Beck N, Adalat R, et al. CBRAIN: a web-based, distributed computing platform for collaborative neuroimaging research. Front Neuroinform. 2014;8:54.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Diggle P. Analysis of longitudinal data. 2nd ed. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press; 2002. xv, p. 379.

  33. Singer JD, Willett JB. Applied longitudinal data analysis: modeling change and event occurrence. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press; 2003. xx, p. 644.

  34. Ducharme S, Albaugh MD, Hudziak JJ, Botteron KN, Nguyen TV, Truong C, et al. Anxious/depressed symptoms are linked to right ventromedial prefrontal cortical thickness maturation in healthy children and young adults. Cereb Cortex. 2014;24:2941–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Vijayakumar N, Mills KL, Alexander-Bloch A, Tamnes CK, Whittle S. Structural brain development: A review of methodological approaches and best practices. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2018;33:129–48.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Walhovd KB, Fjell AM, Giedd J, Dale AM, Brown TT. Through Thick and Thin: a Need to Reconcile Contradictory Results on Trajectories in Human Cortical Development. Cereb Cortex. 2017;27:1472–81.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Worsley KJ, Taylor JE, Tomaiuolo F, Lerch J. Unified univariate and multivariate random field theory. Neuroimage. 2004;23:S189–95.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Andrews DS, Avino TA, Gudbrandsen M, Daly E, Marquand A, Murphy CM, et al. In Vivo Evidence of Reduced Integrity of the Gray-White Matter Boundary in Autism Spectrum Disorder. Cereb Cortex. 2017;27:877–87.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Ecker C, Ginestet C, Feng Y, Johnston P, Lombardo MV, Lai MC, et al. Brain surface anatomy in adults with autism: the relationship between surface area, cortical thickness, and autistic symptoms. JAMA Psychiatry. 2013;70:59–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Hong SJ, Bernhardt BC, Schrader DS, Bernasconi N, Bernasconi A. Whole-brain MRI phenotyping in dysplasia-related frontal lobe epilepsy. Neurology. 2016;86:643–50.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Valk SL, Bernhardt BC, Trautwein FM, Bockler A, Kanske P, Guizard N, et al. Structural plasticity of the social brain: Differential change after socio-affective and cognitive mental training. Sci Adv. 2017;3:e1700489.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. The jamovi project. jamovi 2021 [Version 1.6:[https://www.jamovi.org.

  43. Sahin MD, Aybek EC. Jamovi: An Easy to Use Statistical Software for the Social Scientists. Int J Assess Tools E. 2019;6:670–92.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Cheng J, Cheng NF, Guo Z, Gregorich S, Ismail AI, Gansky SA. Mediation analysis for count and zero-inflated count data. Stat Methods Med Res. 2018;27:2756–74.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. RStudio Team. RStudio: Integrated Development for R. Boston, MA: RStudio, PBC; 2020.

  46. Tingley D, Yamamoto T, Hirose K, Keele L, Imai K. Mediation: R Package for Causal Mediation Analysis. J Stat Softw. 2014;59:1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Qiu L, Yan H, Zhu R, Yan J, Yuan H, Han Y, et al. Correlations between exploratory eye movement, hallucination, and cortical gray matter volume in people with schizophrenia. BMC Psychiatry. 2018;18:226.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. van Erp TGM, Walton E, Hibar DP, Schmaal L, Jiang W, Glahn DC, et al. Cortical Brain Abnormalities in 4474 Individuals With Schizophrenia and 5098 Control Subjects via the Enhancing Neuro Imaging Genetics Through Meta Analysis (ENIGMA) Consortium. Biol Psychiatry. 2018;84:644–54.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Wannan CMJ, Cropley VL, Chakravarty MM, Bousman C, Ganella EP, Bruggemann JM, et al. Evidence for Network-Based Cortical Thickness Reductions in Schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry. 2019;176:552–63.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Paus T, Keshavan M, Giedd JN. Why do many psychiatric disorders emerge during adolescence? Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008;9:947–57.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Albaugh MD, Owens MM, Garavan H. Association of Alcohol With Cortical Thickness in Adolescents-Reply. JAMA Psychiatry. 2021;78:1284–5.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Chung WW, Hudziak JJ. The Transitional Age Brain: “The Best of Times and the Worst of Times”. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2017;26:157–75.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Silins E, Horwood LJ, Patton GC, Fergusson DM, Olsson CA, Hutchinson DM, et al. Young adult sequelae of adolescent cannabis use: an integrative analysis. Lancet Psychiatry. 2014;1:286–93.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Fergusson DM, Boden JM, Horwood LJ. The developmental antecedents of illicit drug use: evidence from a 25-year longitudinal study. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2008;96:165–77.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Nkansah-Amankra S, Minelli M. “Gateway hypothesis” and early drug use: Additional findings from tracking a population-based sample of adolescents to adulthood. Prev Med Rep. 2016;4:134–41.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Grant JD, Lynskey MT, Scherrer JF, Agrawal A, Heath AC, Bucholz KK. A cotwin-control analysis of drug use and abuse/dependence risk associated with early-onset cannabis use. Addict Behav. 2010;35:35–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Castellanos-Ryan N, Pingault JB, Parent S, Vitaro F, Tremblay RE, Seguin JR. Adolescent cannabis use, change in neurocognitive function, and high-school graduation: A longitudinal study from early adolescence to young adulthood. Dev Psychopathol. 2017;29:1253–66.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Ferland JN, Ellis RJ, Betts G, Silveira MM, de Firmino JB, Winstanley CA, et al. Long-Term Outcomes of Adolescent THC Exposure on Translational Cognitive Measures in Adulthood in an Animal Model and Computational Assessment of Human Data. JAMA Psychiatry. 2023;80:66–76.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Sideli L, Quigley H, La Cascia C, Murray RM. Cannabis Use and the Risk for Psychosis and Affective Disorders. J Dual Diagn. 2020;16:22–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Livne O, Shmulewitz D, Sarvet AL, Wall MM, Hasin DS. Association of Cannabis Use-Related Predictor Variables and Self-Reported Psychotic Disorders: U.S. Adults, 2001-2002 and 2012-2013. Am J Psychiatry. 2022;179:36–45.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Di Forti M, Quattrone D, Freeman TP, Tripoli G, Gayer-Anderson C, Quigley H, et al. The contribution of cannabis use to variation in the incidence of psychotic disorder across Europe (EU-GEI): a multicentre case-control study. Lancet Psychiatry. 2019;6:427–36.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Murray RM, Hall W. Will Legalization and Commercialization of Cannabis Use Increase the Incidence and Prevalence of Psychosis? JAMA Psychiatry. 2020;77:777–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Raznahan A, Lerch JP, Lee N, Greenstein D, Wallace GL, Stockman M, et al. Patterns of coordinated anatomical change in human cortical development: a longitudinal neuroimaging study of maturational coupling. Neuron. 2011;72:873–84.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Lebel C, Gee M, Camicioli R, Wieler M, Martin W, Beaulieu C. Diffusion tensor imaging of white matter tract evolution over the lifespan. Neuroimage. 2012;60:340–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Bethlehem RAI, Seidlitz J, White SR, Vogel JW, Anderson KM, Adamson C, et al. Brain charts for the human lifespan. Nature. 2022;604:525–33.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Nelson CA 3rd, Gabard-Durnam LJ. Early Adversity and Critical Periods: Neurodevelopmental Consequences of Violating the Expectable Environment. Trends Neurosci. 2020;43:133–43.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Gee DG, Casey BJ. The Impact of Developmental Timing for Stress and Recovery. Neurobiol Stress. 2015;1:184–94.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work received support from the following sources: the European Union-funded FP6 Integrated Project IMAGEN (Reinforcement-related behavior in normal brain function and psychopathology) (LSHM-CT- 2007–037286), the Horizon 2020 funded ERC Advanced Grant ‘STRATIFY’ (Brain network based stratification of reinforcement-related disorders) (695313), Human Brain Project (HBP SGA 2, 785907, and HBP SGA 3, 945539), the Medical Research Council Grant ‘c-VEDA’ (Consortium on Vulnerability to Externalizing Disorders and Addictions) (MR/N000390/1), the National Institute of Health (NIH) (R01DA049238, A decentralized macro and micro gene-by-environment interaction analysis of substance use behavior and its brain biomarkers), the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King’s College London, the Bundesministeriumfür Bildung und Forschung (BMBF grants 01GS08152; 01EV0711; Forschungsnetz AERIAL 01EE1406A, 01EE1406B; Forschungsnetz IMAC-Mind 01GL1745B), the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG grants SM 80/7–2, SFB 940, TRR 265, NE 1383/14-1), the Medical Research Foundation and Medical Research Council (grants MR/R00465X/1 and MR/S020306/1), the National Institutes of Health (NIH) funded ENIGMA (grants 5U54EB020403-05 and 1R56AG058854-01). Further support was provided by grants from: – the ANR (ANR-12-SAMA-0004, AAPG2019 – GeBra), the Eranet Neuron (AF12-NEUR0008-01 – WM2NA; and ANR-18-NEUR00002-01 – ADORe), the Fondation de France (00081242), the Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale (DPA20140629802), the Mission Interministérielle de Lutte-contre-les-Drogues-et-les-Conduites-Addictives (MILDECA), the Assistance-Publique-Hôpitaux-de-Paris and INSERM (interface grant), Paris Sud University IDEX 2012, the Fondation de l’Avenir (grant AP-RM-17-013), the Fédération pour la Recherche sur le Cerveau; the National Institutes of Health, Science Foundation Ireland (16/ERCD/3797), U.S.A. (Axon, Testosterone and Mental Health during Adolescence; R01 MH085772-01A1), and by NIH Consortium grant U54 EB020403, supported by a cross-NIH alliance that funds Big Data to Knowledge Centres of Excellence. ImagenPathways “Understanding the Interplay between Cultural, Biological and Subjective Factors in Drug Use Pathways” is a collaborative project supported by the European Research Area Network on Illicit Drugs (ERANID). This paper is based on independent research commissioned and funded in England by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Policy Research Programme (project ref. PR-ST-0416-10001). The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the national funding agencies or ERANID. Dr Albaugh is supported by K08 MH121654-01A1 and a NARSAD Young Investigator Grant from the Brain & Behavior Research Foundation. Drs Albaugh and Garavan had full access to all the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the paper; and decision to submit the paper for publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Contributions

MA conceived and performed the analysis, interpreted the results, and wrote the paper. AP and HG supervised the project, interpreted the results, and edited the paper. CL and PR assisted in the storage and processing of neuroimaging data. The rest of the authors contributed to the data acquisition and sharing and edited the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew D. Albaugh.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Dr TB has served as an advisor or consultant to Bristol-Myers Squibb, Desitin Arzneimittel, Eli Lilly, Medice, Novartis, Pfizer, Shire, UCB, and Vifor Pharma; he has received conference attendance support, conference support, or speaking fees from Eli Lilly, Janssen McNeil, Medice, Novartis, Shire, and UCB; and he is involved in clinical trials conducted by Eli Lilly, Novartis, and Shire; the present work is unrelated to these relationships. The other authors report no biomedical financial interests or potential competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Albaugh, M.D., Owens, M.M., Juliano, A. et al. Differential associations of adolescent versus young adult cannabis initiation with longitudinal brain change and behavior. Mol Psychiatry 28, 5173–5182 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-023-02148-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-023-02148-2

Search

Quick links