Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Early treatment response in first episode psychosis: a 7-T magnetic resonance spectroscopic study of glutathione and glutamate


Early response to antipsychotic medications is one of the most important determinants of later symptomatic and functional outcomes in psychosis. Glutathione and glutamate have emerged as promising therapeutic targets for patients demonstrating inadequate response to dopamine-blocking antipsychotics. Nevertheless, the role of these neurochemicals in the mechanism of early antipsychotic response remains poorly understood. Using a longitudinal design and ultrahigh field 7-T magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) protocol in 53 subjects, we report the association between dorsal anterior cingulate cortex glutamate and glutathione, with time to treatment response in drug naive (34.6% of the sample) or minimally medicated first episode patients with schizophreniform disorder, schizophrenia, and schizoaffective disorder. Time to response was defined as the number of weeks required to reach a 50% reduction in the PANSS-8 scores. Higher glutathione was associated with shorter time to response (F = 4.86, P = 0.017), while higher glutamate was associated with more severe functional impairment (F = 5.33, P = 0.008). There were no significant differences between patients and controls on measures of glutamate or glutathione. For the first time, we have demonstrated an association between higher glutathione and favorable prognosis in FEP. We propose that interventions that increase brain glutathione levels may improve outcomes of early intervention in psychosis.


Early treatment response has been identified as one of the most robust predictors of longer-term clinical outcomes in schizophrenia [1]. In particular, lack of early response appears to be strongly indicative of subsequent nonresponse [2], failure to achieve remission [3], and higher rates of treatment discontinuation [4]. Approximately one third of patients with schizophrenia are considered to be treatment resistant [5], with the majority of these (23–34%) failing to respond appreciably to dopamine-blocking antipsychotic medications from their first episode of psychosis (FEP) [6, 7]. Nevertheless, the neurochemical mechanism of early response is poorly understood, precluding efforts to prevent or reduce the rates of treatment failure and persistent disability.

The FEP is characterized by a relative state of glutamatergic excess [8, 9]. Elevated anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) glutamate has been found to be inversely correlated with striatal dopamine synthesis in patients with FEP [10]. Given that the elevated striatal dopamine synthesis relates to better treatment response [11] in psychosis, the observed glutamatergic excess has been considered to be an index of reduced treatment responsiveness in psychosis [12]. Elevated ACC glutamate has been directly associated with lack of remission in certain samples of chronic [13,14,15] or first-episode schizophrenia [16, 17] [UK sample], but this has not been a consistent observation. For example, in a sample of patients with established schizophrenia, Iwata et al. [18] reported no difference in dorsal ACC glutamate levels between treatment responsive and resistant groups. Similarly, the samples in 2 out of 3 sites in another study showed no glutamate excess in patients with FEP who did not achieve remission by 1 month [17]. Nevertheless, relative glutamatergic excess appears to be specific to early stages of illness [8], and relates to more severe symptoms at presentation [17], as well as gray matter decline [19], cognitive [20], and functional [16, 17] impairments. The lack of dopamine elevation seen in some patients may explain their lack of response to dopamine blocking medications.

Glutathione (GSH), the brain’s most prominent intracellular antioxidant, has been suspected to play a key protective role in free-radical-mediated damage to neurons [21], giving rise to the redox dysregulation hypothesis of schizophrenia [22]. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) studies have found a small but significant GSH deficit in the ACC in patients with schizophrenia [23], indicating the presence of subgroups of patients with different redox profiles [24]. The most prominent reduction in GSH seems to occur particularly in patients with persistent residual symptoms, indicating that low levels of GSH may be associated with poor response to antipsychotics [25]. Furthermore, N-acetyl-cysteine (NAC), a precursor of GSH, appears to increase the rate of symptomatic response when used as an adjunct to antipsychotics [26].

Glutamate is a precursor of GSH while GSH acts as a neuronal reservoir for glutamate synthesis [27]. As a result, when neuroglial metabolic integrity is intact, glutamate and GSH levels remain tightly linked in the brain. Glutamatergic excess can result in neurotoxic oxidative stress [28], while a concomitant elevation of GSH may provide a neuroprotective “gate-keeping” effect [29], thus a strong covariance may be a marker of a healthy state. Nevertheless, repeated or prolonged exposure to excess glutamate can deplete GSH levels [30]. Furthermore, the GSH-glutamate homeostasis may also be disrupted in patients with schizophrenia due to deficiencies in GSH synthesis [31], leading to reduced GSH-glutamate covariance in patients with FEP.

In this study, we use ultrahigh field 7T MRS for the first time to test the relative contribution of ACC GSH deficiency and glutamatergic excess in predicting early treatment response in FEP. Given the gatekeeper role of GSH in tackling oxidative stress [31], we expected GSH to be a more critical determinant of early treatment response in FEP. We hypothesized that FEP patients with higher GSH levels would demonstrate faster symptom reduction upon starting antipsychotic treatment (hypothesis 1). As not all patients with FEP will be able to increase GSH in accordance with glutamate levels, we expected a reduction in the strength of correlation between the GSH and glutamate levels in patients compared with healthy controls (hypothesis 2). Furthermore, in light of the excitotoxic theory of acute schizophrenia [32], we expected both reduced GSH and increased glutamate levels to predict impaired Social and Occupational Functioning at the onset of illness (hypothesis 3).



The sample consisted of 37 new referrals to the PEPP (Prevention and Early Intervention for Psychosis Program) at London Health Sciences Center between April, 2017 and January, 2018 (see Supplementary Fig. 1 for details on the representativeness of the sample). All potential participants provided written, informed consent prior to participation as per approval provided by the Western University Health Sciences Research Ethics Board, London, Ontario. Inclusion criteria for study participation were as follows: individuals experiencing FEP, and having received antipsychotic treatment for less than 14 days in their lifetime. A consensus diagnosis was established using the best estimate procedure [33] for all participants after ~6 months by 3 psychiatrists (KD/LP and the primary treatment provider) based on the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 [34]. Participants meeting criteria for bipolar disorder with psychotic features, major depressive disorder with psychotic features, or suspected drug-induced psychoses were excluded from further analyses. Antipsychotic medications were chosen by the treating psychiatrist and the patient and/or their substitute decision maker in a collaborative manner. There was no specific protocol in place regarding switching antipsychotic medications in this naturalistic sample. If an individual did switch medications, this was noted and the reasons for switching were recorded. Over the course of the follow-up period for this study, nine individuals switched antipsychotic medications, and in all cases, the reasons for switching were related to side effects. In accordance with current national guidelines for the treatment of FEP, all individuals were offered the option of treatment with a long acting injectable at the earliest opportunity [35].

Healthy control subjects were recruited through the use of posters advertising the opportunity to participate in a neuroimaging study involving tracking outcomes following FEP. Healthy control subjects had no personal history of mental illness, and no family history of psychotic disorders. Group matching with the FEP cohort for age, sex, and parental education was maintained. Exclusion criteria for both the FEP and healthy control groups involved meeting criteria for a substance use disorder in the past year according to DSM-5 [36] criteria (this was based on self-report for controls, and in addition clinical assessment and urine drug screening done at the point of clinical assessment in suspected cases for patients), having a history of a major head injury (leading to a significant period of unconsciousness or seizures), having a significant, uncontrolled medical illness, or having any contraindications to undergoing MRI.

Clinical measures

While the proportion of FEP patients in remission at any given time appears to be relatively consistent, it is often not the same individuals who remain in remission at each time point [37]. The use of absolute criteria in defining remission is highly dependent on initial illness severity, with individuals with a higher initial symptom burden being much less likely to achieve remission [38]. As a result, we studied the continuous measure of time to response as the primary clinical outcome of interest, and used the cross-sectional remission criterion as a secondary measure of interest.

The eight items of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale capturing the core symptoms critical in defining remission (PANSS-8 [39]) was administered at baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and at every clinical encounter thereafter on a 2–4 weekly basis. The PANSS-8 has acceptable internal consistency and comparable sensitivity to early improvement in psychotic symptoms [40] relative to the PANSS-30 [41]. The time to achieve a 50% PANSS-8 improvement from baseline [42], sustained for at least two consecutive visits 2 weeks apart, was used as a continuous measure of treatment response. A 50% symptom improvement from baseline roughly equates to a Clinical Global Impression-Schizophrenia [43] scale score of “much improved” thus, is clinically meaningful [44]. Relative PANSS8 improvement was calculated as (PANSS8baseline − PANSS8endpoint)/(PANSS8baseline − 8) in order to adjust for the minimal possible PANSS8 score [45]. All patients were observed clinically for a period of at least 6 months, and no patients failed to reach this milestone within this time frame.

We also assessed binary remission status after the first month of treatment (remission or not in remission). Symptomatic remission was allocated based on remission criteria proposed by Andreasen et al. [39] which categorize remission as achieving scores of mild (3) or less on all PANSS8 items, without any stipulation of a duration criteria, in line with Egerton et al. [16, 17]. Finally, social functioning was assessed at baseline using the Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS [46]).

Medication adherence

Individuals were treated with long-acting injectable (LAI) medications whenever clinically appropriate. Patients taking LAI’s received their injection from a nurse at the PEPP clinic and therefore, it was known if an individual had missed, or was late for their scheduled dose. Assessments of medication adherence were also recorded at each clinical encounter, taking into account information provided by the patient, their family, and/or case manager using a 5-point rating scale (ranging from 0 for individuals not taking medication to 4 for those being adherent 75–100% of the time). This measure has been found to correlate with pill counts [47]. We only included subjects who had >75% recorded adherence.


Metabolite concentrations (glutamate and GSH) were estimated using single-voxel 1H-MRS data acquired with a Siemens/Agilent MAGNETOM 7.0T head-only MRI (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany; Agilent, Walnut Creek, California, USA) using an 8-channel transmit/32-channel receive head coil at the Center for Functional and Metabolic Mapping of Western University in London, Ontario. A 2.0 × 2.0 × 2.0 cm (8 cm3) 1H-MRS voxel was placed in the bilateral dorsal ACC (see Fig. 1) using a two-dimensional anatomical imaging sequence in the sagittal direction (37 slices, TR = 8000 ms, TE = 70 ms, flip-angle (α) = 120°, thickness = 3.5 mm, field of view = 240 × 191 mm). The posterior end of the voxel was set to coincide with the precentral gyrus and the caudal face of the voxel coincided with the most caudal location not part of the corpus callosum. The angulation of the voxel was determined to be tangential to the corpus callosum (see Supplementary Figs. 2 and 3). A total of 32 channel-combined, water-suppressed spectra were acquired using a semi-LASER 1H-MRS pulse sequence (TR = 7500 ms, TE = 100 ms) during each scan session, while participants were at rest and asked to stare at a white cross on a black screen for 4 min. Water suppression was achieved using the VAPOR preparation sequence [48], and water-unsuppressed spectra were acquired for spectral quantification and line shape deconvolution reference. The 32 spectra were corrected for frequency and phase drifts as described in Near et al. [49] prior to averaging and lineshape deconvolution using QUECC [50]. Residual water peaks were removed from the averaged spectrum using HSVD [51] (see Supplementary Fig. 4). Metabolite quantification was acquired using Barstool [52] (see Supplementary Fig. 5). Water-subtracted spectra were modeled using the fitMAN, a-prior-knowledge based minimization algorithm, and a quantification template including 17 metabolite spectral signatures derived from simulation [52]. Our fitting template included 17 metabolites (alanine, aspartate, choline, creatine, GABA, glucose, glutamate, glutamine, GSH, glycine, lactate, myo-inositol, N-acetyl aspartate, N-acetyl aspartyl glutamate, phosphorylethanolamine, scyllo-inositol, and taurine). Importantly, at this long echo time, no macromolecules were included in the spectra as their signal had decayed below noise level. Metabolite concentrations were corrected for gray and white matter volumes using the anatomical MRI images and previously described methods [53]. All spectra and spectral fit were inspected visually for quality and Cramer-Rao lower bounds (CRLB) were assessed for each metabolite. The MRS metabolite estimates were not known at the time of clinical outcome characterization. See the Supplementary for further details on the MRS methods.

Fig. 1: Dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) voxel for MRS glutamate and glutathione estimation.

The coronal, sagittal and axial views of the MRS voxel (red square) are displayed on a single subject’s T1 structural image.

Statistical analyses

All statistical tests were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 24. Differences in demographic and baseline factors between patients and controls were calculated using t tests for continuous variables, and chi-square analyses for dichotomous variables. A linear regression analysis was used to assess the association between metabolites (glutamate and GSH), and both time to response, and social functioning (Hypotheses 1 and 3). Using ANOVA, we then compared glutamate and GSH measures among patients achieving remission at 1 month, no remission at 1 month, and healthy controls. Finally, Pearson correlation coefficients were used to assess the association between glutamate and GSH in patients and healthy controls. Differences in the magnitude of these correlations were then evaluated using Fisher’s r-to-Z transformation (Hypothesis 2).


Patient characteristics

Thirty seven patients completed baseline scanning. Of these, 27 met criteria for a schizophrenia spectrum disorder (SSD: schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or schizophreniform disorder). Follow-up outcome data were not available for one female patient who was transferred to a different hospital shortly after scanning. In one male patient, time to response was not available due to irregular follow-up however, remission status at 1 month was obtained. Therefore, the final sample consisted of 26 patients with SSD, with time to response measures available for 25 patients (Table 1). See Supplementary (SF1) for the representativeness of the sample. Based on Egerton et al. [17] (UK sample) reporting an effect size d = 2.6 for ACC glutamate difference between 1-month remitters and nonremitters, we required a sample of at least 22 patients to demonstrate 50% of the reported effect (d = 1.3), with 5% type 1 and 20% type 2 error rates.

Table 1 Sample demographic and clinical characteristics.

Nine patients (34.6%) were antipsychotic naive at the time of scanning, five patients were taking other psychotropic medications at the time of scanning as follows: two clonazepam, one lorazepam, one escitalopram, and one sertraline. Of those who had already started antipsychotic treatment, (17; 65.4%), the median days of treatment was 6 (range of 3–12 days). The mean total defined daily dose-days (DDD × days on medication) for antipsychotic use was 2.27 days. At 1 month, 12 patients (46.15%) were taking a long acting injectable medication. In terms of cross-sectional remission, we observed the rates of 42.31% (n = 11 of 26) a 1-month, 50% (n = 13 of 26) at 3-months, and 60% (n = 15 of 25) at 6 months. We did not stipulate cessation before scanning to avoid possible withdrawal effects and participants may have used nicotine on the day of scanning.

1H-MRS data quality

The mean glutamate CRLB percentages did not differ between healthy controls and patients (mean (SD) in % = 3.36 (1.02) in controls; 3.72 (1.19) in FEP; t = 1.16, p = 0.25). Mean GSH CRLBs were (mean (SD) in % = 10.46(3.88) in controls; 11.47 (4.92) in FEP; t = 0.81, p = 0.42). The percent coefficient of variation (%CV), calculated as the standard deviation divided by the mean of a sample, was 20.4% and 24.1% for healthy control and FEP glutamate measurements, respectively, and 24.8% and 22.6% for healthy control and FEP GSH measurements, respectively (control vs. FEP—p > 0.6 for both metabolites). The average line width of the water-unsuppressed spectra did not differ between the two groups (mean (SD) = 7.62 (1.17) in controls; 7.48 (1.42) in FEP; t = 0.39, p = 0.7). The NAA peak-area signal-to-noise ratio was also not different (mean (SD) = 109.88 (18.37) in controls (range = 79.52–142.06); 102.19 (24.53) in FEP (range = 60.11–145.72); t = 1.29, p = 0.20) (see Supplementary Table 1), where the NAA peak-area SNR is defined as the ratio of the time-domain amplitude of the NAA CH3 singlet divided by the standard deviation of the noise measured in the last 32 points of the time-domain signal.

GSH, glutamate, and time to response

Multiple regression analysis was used to test if GSH and glutamate significantly predicted the time taken by patients with FEP to respond to antipsychotic treatment. The results of the regression indicated the two predictors explained 31% of the variance (R2 = 0.0.31, F(2, 24) = 4.86, p = 0.018). Higher levels of GSH predicted a shorter time to response (β = −0.65, p = 0.017) while glutamate was not a significant predictor (β = 0.15, p = 0.563) (see Fig. 2a). A very low level of multicollinearity was present (VIF = 1.98 for both GSH and glutamate). Results remained unchanged after controlling for age, sex, and daily dose of antipsychotics.

Fig. 2: Association of dorsal anterior cingulate metabolites with outcome measures.

a Relationship between the estimated concentration of glutathione in millimolar units and the time taken to reach 50% reduction in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS-8 items) score among patients with first-episode psychosis. b Relationship between estimated concentration of glutamate in millimolar units and baseline functioning assessed using Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS) score among patients with first-episode psychosis.

GSH, glutamate, and social functioning

Multiple regression analysis was used to test if GSH and glutamate significantly predicted the SOFAS scores in patients with FEP. The results of the regression indicated the two predictors explained 33% of the variance (R2 = 0.0.33, F(2, 24) = 5.33, p = 0.013). Higher levels of glutamate predicted lower SOFAS scores (β = −0.70, p = 0.008), while GSH was not a significant predictor (β = 0.22, p = 0.376) (see Fig. 2b). A very low level of multicollinearity was present (VIF = 1.89 for both GSH and glutamate). Results remained unchanged after controlling for age, sex, and daily dose of antipsychotics.

Correlations between metabolite levels

The association between glutamate and GSH was tested using Pearson correlation coefficients. There was a positive association between levels of ACC glutamate and GSH in both healthy control subjects (r = 0.91, p < 0.001), and in patients with FEP (r = 0.69, p < 0.001). We then used Fisher’s r-to-z transformation to test the significance of difference between the correlations, and found that the correlation between glutamate and GSH was significantly weaker in patients compared to the healthy control subjects (Z = 2.26, p = 0.023) (see Fig. 3).

Fig. 3: Correlation between glutamate and glutathione in patients and healthy controls.

Left panel (circles): Relationship between the estimated concentration of glutathione in millimolar units and glutamate in millimolar units among healthy control subjects. Right panel (diamonds): Relationship between the estimated concentration of glutathione in millimolar units and glutamate in millimolar units among patients with first-episode psychosis.

Group differences in GSH and glutamate

One-way ANOVAs were conducted to evaluate the differences in metabolite levels among patients in remission or nonremission at 1 month and healthy control subjects. There were no significant difference between groups for glutamate (F(2, 50) = 0.134, p = 0.875) or GSH (F(2, 50) = 0.712, p = 0.496) (see Table 2). There were no significant differences between patients (as a single group) and controls on measures of glutamate (t (51) = −0.266, p = 0.791) or GSH (t (51) = −0.412, p = 0.682.

Table 2 ACC glutamate and GSH levels in patients in remission, not in remission, and healthy controls.

The effects of recreational substance use and types of antipsychotics are presented in the Supplementary.


This is the first study to use ultrahigh-field 7T MRS to investigate the role of glutamate and GSH in early treatment response, and the first 7T MRS study on minimally medicated FEP subjects. A previous 7T MRS study included FEP subjects with an average of 55 weeks of antipsychotic exposure [54], compared with 6 days of median exposure in our sample. A more recent study [23] included FEP subjects with up to 2 years of illness duration, while we recruited all subjects during the acute first episode (mean SOFAS score of 38.1). We report three major findings: (1) patients with FEP with higher GSH levels in ACC show a rapid symptom reduction upon starting antipsychotic treatment, (2) when compared with healthy controls, GSH levels in patients are dissociated from glutamate levels, and (3) Glutamate excess predicts the degree of Social and Occupational dysfunction seen at the time of presentation with FEP. Taken together, these results indicate that markers of cortical redox integrity influence the putative glutamatergic toxicity and early treatment response in psychosis.

Neither glutamate nor GSH were associated with binary remission status at one month. The lack of association is in contrast with the overall results reported by another study [17], but consistent with the observation reported by 2 out of the 3 sites in that study. These differences can be attributed to methodological variations (the use of 7T spectra, more dorsal voxel placement in our study) as well as notable differences in the clinical samples (the use of injectables and the inclusion of both inpatients and outpatients, and the exclusion of patients with low adherence in our study). Egerton et al. [17] noted that higher glutamate levels correlated with greater symptom severity as well as poor functioning at baseline. Individuals, who are more severely ill, may be less likely to adhere to antipsychotic medications, with resulting ongoing symptom burden, and subsequent lack of remission. More recently, Iwata et al. [18] found no differences in glutamate levels in the dorsal ACC between treatment resistant vs. responsive patients. Despite the above clinical and methodological differences, we observed a significant relationship between higher glutamate levels and lower social/occupational functioning, in line with Egerton et al. [17] as well as prior observations from our center [19, 20]. A low level of social functioning at FEP is reported to be a robust and independent predictor of later treatment [55]. This finding adds strength to the prevailing notion that glutamatergic excess plays a critical role in shaping the poor outcome trajectory in psychosis.

We found no significant differences in GSH levels between patients and healthy controls. This is not surprising, given that meta-analytic pooling of ACC GSH studies in schizophrenia reveal a small overall effect size [24], suggesting the possibility of heterogeneity in the GSH levels and thus redox status among patients. Our results suggest that such heterogeneity may map onto antipsychotic responsiveness, resulting in the conflicting findings of GSH levels reported to date in schizophrenia [23].

We found evidence that despite their significant within-group correlation, when compared with healthy controls, glutamate and GSH levels were less tightly correlated among patients with FEP. A similar dissociation was also reported by Xin et al. [56], especially among patients with a GCLC-risk genotype affecting GSH synthesis. These results indicate that in a subset of patients with FEP, concomitant GSH response fails to occur when demands arise due to glutamatergic excess. Such patients are likely to be vulnerable to neurotoxic damage [57], poor treatment response, and greater functional decline as a result of unchecked neuronal/glial damage [58]. Interestingly in healthy controls, when glutamatergic synapses are active due a task demand, GSH levels appear to increase concomitantly with glutamate [59].

There are several strengths to the current study. First, the use of a 7T MR scanner, with higher specificity in identifying the glutamate resonance [60], is a considerable strength. Second, our increased use of LAI’s may have improved adherence rates in our sample. Third, patients were followed frequently (weekly) over the course of their early illness trajectory. Finally, our sample is unique in that we recruited patients before antipsychotic treatment was established.


Participants in our study were treated with various antipsychotics; we cannot rule out variations in response patterns based on differential medication treatment. Secondly, we could not recruit a completely antipsychotic-naive sample for obvious ethical reasons. While it is possible that metabolite levels were affected by antipsychotic medication, our sample is comprised of the least-treated subjects of all MRS glutamate and GSH studies in schizophrenia reported to date (median treatment duration = 2.27 DDD-days). Animal studies have shown that neuroleptic administration in rodents, even over 2 days, can affect D2-receptor occupancy [61]; such rapid effects in human striatum may indirectly affect prefrontal glutamate levels, given the relationship between striatal dopamine and prefrontal glutamate [10]. While the effect of antipsychotics on cerebral GSH is still unknown, Ivanova et al. [62] suggest that serum GSH is affected by typical but not atypical antipsychotics. None of our patients were exposed to typical antipsychotics at the time of scanning. Similarly, other psychotropic medications (although taken in small numbers, including three on benzodiazepines) may have influenced spectroscopic results. Henry et al. [63] found no acute effect on glutamate in healthy volunteers treated acutely with benzodiazepines, though glutamine levels increased. See the Supplementary for the statistical effect of adjustment for dose and type of antipsychotic medication.

A further limitation is that our spectroscopic analysis was limited to the dorsal ACC and did not include more anterior/ventral portions of the medial prefrontal cortex. We cannot completely rule out the effect of recreational substances on the observed results (see Supplementary). One study [64] found that ACC glutamate levels were decreased in individuals who used cannabis regularly, while these results were not replicated in another study [65]. To our knowledge, no studies have investigated the association of GSH with cannabis use and none have examined the effects of cannabis on metabolite levels specifically in a FEP sample. Finally, our patient sample consisted primarily of males, limiting generalization of the results.

A promising implication is that interventions that increase GSH levels early in FEP may have the potential to alter the prognostic trajectory of psychosis (See Supplementary—Translational Relevance for further details). A prospective sequential treatment trial [66] in first episode patients has indicated that merely switching antipsychotics may not boost treatment response in early nonresponders, and second level treatments such as clozapine may be warranted even before the conventional clinical threshold of Treatment Resistant Schizophrenia (i.e., two treatment failures) is met. While early nonresponse is considered to be an indicator of later nonresponse and subsequent treatment resistance in schizophrenia [67], to our knowledge, the association between early nonresponse in first-episode samples and later sequential treatment failures and the status of conventionally defined TRS is yet to be established. One of the challenges in this regard is the high degree of responsiveness to treatment seen in first-episode patients [68] (also observed in the current study), compared to those with acute exacerbation of chronic schizophrenia [67]. In this context, caution is warranted in extrapolating the physiological correlates of early treatment response as indicators of the emergence of categorical treatment resistance at later stages of schizophrenia. Given that GSH levels have a significant impact on the speed of response, we urge further experimental trials that manipulate GSH levels to observe the predicted gain in trajectory of treatment outcomes in FEP.

Preliminary results have demonstrated that NAC, a GSH precursor, may be beneficial in psychotic disorders [69]. NAC has been shown to be efficacious in reducing the symptom burden [70], especially negative [71] and cognitive symptoms [72], and has the potential to alleviate treatment resistance in schizophrenia [73]. Our results suggest that treatments such as NAC may be efficacious particularly in patients who demonstrate an early poor response to antipsychotic medication, as they are likely to have a lower ability to synthesize GSH in response to glutamatergic excess. While MRS indices are indirect measures of tissue metabolite concentrations [74], given the evidence that oral NAC administration in patients with schizophrenia increases GSH content in the ACC [69], we consider MRS as a viable tool for translational investigations into the redox abnormalities of schizophrenia. More speculatively, we suggest that the association of ACC GSH levels at baseline and eventual clozapine-eligibility would be worth investigating in the future, given the lack of objective predictors of clozapine requirement in schizophrenia.


  1. 1.

    Schennach-Wolff R, Seemuller FH, Mayr A, Maier W, Klingberg S, Heuser I, et al. An early improvement threshold to predict response and remission in first-episode schizophrenia. Br J Psychiatry. 2010;196:460–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Stauffer VL, Case M, Kinon BJ, Conley R, Ascher-Svanum H, Kollack-Walker S, et al. Early response to antipsychotic therapy as a clinical marker of subsequent response in the treatment of patients with first-episode psychosis. Psychiatry Res. 2011;187:42–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Emsley R, Osthulzen PP, Kidd M, Koen L, Niehaus DJ, Turner HJ. Remission in first-episode psychosis: predictor variables and symptom improvement patterns. J Clin Psychiatry. 2006;67:1707–12.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Kinon BJ, Chen L, Ascher-Svanum H, Stauffer VL, Kollack-Walker S, Sniadecki JL, et al. Predicting response to atypical antipsychotics based on early response in the treatment of schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2008;102:230–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Lindenmayer JP. Treatment refractory schizophrenia. Psychiatr Q. 2000;71:373–84.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Lally J, Ajnakina O, Di Forti M, Trotta A, Demjaha A, Kolliakou A, et al. Two distinct patterns of treatment resistance in first-episode schizophrenia-spectrum psychoses. Psychol Med. 2016;46:3231–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Demjaha A, Lappin JM, Stahl D, Patel MX, MacCabe JH, Howes OD, et al. Antipsychotic treatment resistance in first-episode psychosis: prevalence, subtypes and predictors. Psychol Med. 2017;47:1981–9.

  8. 8.

    Poels EMP, Kegeles LS, Kantrowitz JT, Javitt DC, Lieberman JA, Abi-Dargham A, et al. Glutamatergic abnormalities in schizophrenia: a review of proton MRS findings. Schizophr Res. 2014;152:325–32.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Merritt K, Egerton A, Kempton MJ, Taylor MJ, McGuire PK. Nature of glutamate alterations in schizophrenia: a meta-analysis of proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy studies. JAMA Psychiatry. 2016;73:665–74.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Jauhar S, McCutcheon R, Borgan F, Veronese M, Nour M, Pepper F, et al. The relationship between cortical glutamate and striatal dopamine in first-episode psychosis: a cross-sectional multimodal PET and magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging study. Lancet Psychiatry. 2018;5:816–23.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Abi-Dargham A, Rodenhiser J, Printz D, Zea-Ponce Y, Gil R, Kegeles L, et al. Increased baseline occupancy of D2 receptors by dopamine in schizophrenia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97:8104–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Howes O, McCutcheon R, Stone J. Glutamate and dopamine in schizophrenia: an update for the 21st century. J Psychopharmacol. 2015;29:97–115.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Mouchlianitis E, Bloomfield MAP, Law V, Beck K, Selvaraj S, Naresh Rasquinha, et al. Treatment-resistant schizophrenia patients show elevated anterior cingulate cortex glutamate compared to treatment-responsive. Schizophr Bull. 2016;42:744–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Szulc A, Konarzewska B, Galinska-Skok B, Lazarczyk J, Waszkiewicz N, Tarasow E, et al. Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy measures related to short-term symptomatic outcome in chronic schizophrenia. Neurosci Lett. 2013;547:37–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Demjaha A, Egerton A, Murray RM, et al. Antipsychotic treatment resistance in schizophrenia associated with elevated glutamate levels but normal dopamine function. Biol Psychiatry. 2014;75:11–3.

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Egerton A, Brugger S, Raffin M, Barker GJ, Lythgoe GJ, McGuire PK, et al. Anterior cingulate glutamate levels related to clinical status following treatment in first-episode schizophrenia. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2012;37:2515–21.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Egerton A, Broberg BV, Van Haren N, Merrit K, Barker GJ, Lythcoe DJ, et al. Response to initial antipsychotic treatment in first episode psychosis is related to anterior cingulate glutamate levels: a multicenter 1H-MRS study (OPTiMiSE). Mol Psychiatry. 2018;23:2145–55.

  18. 18.

    Iwata Y, Nakajima S, Plitman E, Mihashi Y, Caravaggio F, Chung JK, et al. Neurometabolite levels in antipsychotic-naïve/free patients with schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 1H-MRS studies. Prog Neuro-Psychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2018;86:340–52.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Aoyoma N, Theberge J, Drost DJ, Manchanda R, Northcott S, Neufeld RW, et al. Grey matter and social functioning correlates of glutamatergic metabolite loss in schizophrenia. Br J Psychiatry. 2011;198:448–56.

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Dempster K, Norman R, Theberge J, Densmore M, Schaefer B, Williamson P. Glutamatergic metabolite correlations with neuropsychological tests in first episode schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging. 2015;233:180–5.

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Mahadik SP, Mukherjee S. Free radical pathology and antioxidant defense in schizophrenia: a review. Schizophr Res. 1996;19:1–17.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Do KQ, Cabungcal JH, Frank A, Steullet P, Cuenod M. Redox dysregulation, neurodevelopment, and schizophrenia. Curr Opin Neuobiol. 2009;19:220–30.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Wang AM, Pradhan S, Coughlin JM, Trivedi A, DubBois SL, Crawford JL, et al. Assessing brain metabolism with 7-T proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in patients with first-episode psychosis. JAMA Psychiatry. 2019;76:314–23.

  24. 24.

    Das TK, Javadzadeh A, Dey A, Sabesan P, Theberge J, Radua J, et al. Antioxidant defense in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: a meta-analysis of MRS studies of anterior cingulate glutathione. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2019;91:94–102.

  25. 25.

    Kumar J, Liddle EB, Fernandes CC, Palaniyappan L, Hall EL, Robson SE, et al. Glutathione and Glutamate in schizophrenia: a 7T MRS Study. Mol Psychiatry. 2018.

  26. 26.

    Klauser P, Xin L, Fournier M, Griffa A, Cleusix M, Jenni R, et al. N-acetyl-cysteine add-on treatment leads to an improvement of fornix white matter integrity in early psychosis. Schizophr Bull. 2018;44:5133–4.

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Sedlak TW, Paul BD, Parker GM, Hester LD, Snowman AM, Taniguchi Y, et al. The glutathione cycle shapes synaptic glutamate activity. PNAS 2019;116:2701–6

  28. 28.

    Volterra A, Trotti D, Tromba C, Floridi S, Racagni G. Glutamate uptake inhibition by oxygen free radicals in rat cortical astrocytes. J Neurosci. 1994;14:2924–32.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Frade J, Pope S, Schmidt M, Dringen R, Barbosa R, Pacock J, et al. Glutamate induces release of glutathione from cultured rat astrocytes- a possible neuroprotective mechanism. J Neurochem. 2008;105:1144–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Shih AY, Erb H, Sun X, Toda S, Kallivas PW, Murphy TH. Cystine/glutamate exchange modulates glutathione supply for neuroprotection from oxidative stress and cell proliferation. J Neurosci. 2006;26:10514–23.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Fournier M, Monin A, Ferrari C, Baumann PS, Conus P, Do K. Implication of the glutamate-cystine antiporter xCT in schizophrenia cases linked to impaired GSH synthesis. NPJ Schizophr. 2017;3:31.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Plitman E, Patel R, Chung JK, Pipitone J, Chavez S, Reyes-Madrigal F, et al. Glutamatergic metabolites, volume, and cortical thickness in antipsychotic-naïve patients with first episode psychosis: implications for excitotoxicity. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2016;41:2606–13.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Leckman JF, Sholomskas D, Thompson WD, Belanger A, Weissman MM. Best estimate of lifetime psychiatric diagnosis: a methodological study. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1982;39:879–83.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    First MB, Williams JBW, Karg RS, Spitzer RL. Structured clinical interview for DSM-5 disorders, clinician version (SCID-5-CV). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association; 2016.

  35. 35.

    Remington G, Addington D, Honer W, Ismail Z, Raedler T, Teehan M. Guidelines for the pharmacotherapy of schizophrenia in adults. Can J Psychiatry. 2017;62:604–16.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5th ed. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing; 2013.

  37. 37.

    Norman R, Anderson K, MacDougall A, Manchanda R, Harricharan R, Subramanian P, et al. Stability of outcomes after 5 years of treatment in an early intervention program. Early Interv Psychiatry. 2018;12:720–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Harvey PD, Bellack AS. Toward a terminology of functional recovery in schizophrenia: is functional remission a viable concept? Schizophr Bull. 2009;35:300–6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Andreasen NC, Carpenter WT Jr, Kane JM, Lasser RA, Marder SR, Weinberger DR. Remission in schizophrenia: proposed criteria and rationale for consensus. Am J Psychiatry. 2005;162:441–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Lin CH, Lin HS, Kuo CC, Wang FC, Huang YH. Early Improvement in PANSS-30, PANSS-8 and PANSS-6 scores predicts ultimate response and remission during acute treatment of schizophrenia. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2018;137:98–108.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Kay SR, Fiszbein A, Opler LA. The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 1987;13:261–76.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Leucht Stefan, Beitinger Romain, Kissling Werner. On the concept of remission in schizophrenia. Psychopharmacology. 2007;194:453–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Haro JM, Kamath SA, Ochoa S, Novick D, Rele K, Fargas A, et al. The clinical global impression-schizophrenia scale: a simple instrument to measure the diversity of symptoms present in schizophrenia. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl. 2003;416:16–23.

    Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Correll C, Kishimoto T, Nielsen J, Kane J. Quantifying clinical relevance in the treatment of schizophrenia. Clin Ther. 2011;33:B16–39.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Obermeier M, Mayr A, Schennach-Wolff R, Seamuller F, Moller H-J, Riedel M. Should the PANSS be rescaled? Schizophr Bull. 2010;36:455–60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Goldman HH, Skodol AE, Lave TR. Revising axis V for DSM-IV: a review of measures of social functioning. Am J Psychiatry. 1992;149:1148–56.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Cassidy CM, Rabinovitch M, Schmitz N, Joober R, Malla A. A comparison study of multiple measures of adherence to antipsychotic medication in first-episode psychosis. J Clin Pharmacol. 2010;30:64–7.

    Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Tkáć I, Gruetter R. Methodology of 1 H NMR spectroscopy of the human brain at very high magnetic fields. Appl Magn Reson. 2005;29:139–57.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Near J, Edden R, Evans CJ, Paquin R, Harris A, Jezzard P. Frequency and phase drift correction of magnetic resonance spectroscopy data by spectral registration in the time domain. Magn Reson Med. 2015;73:44–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Bartha R, Drost DJ, Menon RS, Williamson PC. Spectroscopic lineshape correction by QUECC: combined QUALITY deconvolution and Eddy current correction. Magn Reson Med. 2000;44:641–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Bartha R, Drost DJ, Williamson PC. Factors affecting the quantification of short echo in vivo 1H MR spectra: prior knowledge, peak elimination, and filtering. NMR Biomed. 1999;12:205–16.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Wong D, Schranz A, Bartha R. Optimized in vivo brain glutamate measurement using long-echo time semi-LASER at 7 T. NMR in Biomed. 2018:e4002.

  53. 53.

    Stanley JA, Drost DJ, Williamson PC, Thompson RT. The use of a priori knowledge to quantify short echo in vivo 1H MR spectra. Magn Reson Med. 1995;34:17–24.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Reid MA, Salibi N, White DM, Gawne TJ, Denney TS, Lahti AC. 7T Proton Magnetic Spectroscopy of the Anterior Cingulate Cortex in First Episode Schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 2019;45:180–9.

  55. 55.

    Horsdal HT, Wimberley T, Kohler-Forsberg O, Baandrup L, Gasse C. Association between global functioning at first schizophrenia diagnosis and treatment resistance. Early Interv Psychiatry. 2018;12:1198–202.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Xin L, Mekle R, Fournier M, Baumann PS, Ferrari C, Alameda L, et al. Genetic polymorphism associated prefrontal glutathione and its coupling with brain glutamate and peripheral redox status in early psychosis. Schizophr Bull. 2016;42:1185–96.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Hulshoff Pol HE, Kahn RS. What happens after the first episode? A review of progressive brain changes in chronically ill patients with schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 2008;34:354–66.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Kantrowitz JT, Javitt DC. N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor dysfunction or dysregulation: the final common pathway on the road to schizophrenia? Brain Res Bull. 2010;83:108–21.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Lin Y, Stephenson MC, Xin L, Napolitano A, Morris PG. Investigating the metabolic changes due to visual stimulation using functional proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy at 7T. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2012;32:1484–95.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Pradhan S, Bonekamp S, Gillen JS, Rowland LM, Wijtenburg SA, Edden RAE, et al. Comparison of single voxel brain MRS AT 3 T and 7 T using 32-channel head coils. Magn Reson Imaging. 2015;33:1013–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Samaha AN, Seeman P, Stewart J, Rajabi H, Kapur S. “Breakthrough” dopamine supersensitivity during ongoing antipsychotic treatment leads to treatment failure overtime. J Neurosci. 2007;27:2979–86.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Ivanova SA, Smirnova LP, Shchigoreva YG, Semke AV, Bokhan NV. Serum glutathione in patients with schizophrenia in dynamics of antipsychotic therapy. Bull Exp Biol Med. 2015;160:283–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Henry ME, Jensen JE, Licata SC, Ravichandran C, Butman ML, Shanahan M, et al. The acute and late CNS glutamine response to benzodiazepine challenge: a pilot pharmacokinetic study using proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Psychiatry Res. 2010;184:171–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Prescot AP, Renshaw PF, Yurgelun-Todd DA. γ-Amino butyric acid and glutamate abnormalities in adolescent chronic marijuana smokers. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2013;129:232–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Sung Y-H, Carey PD, Stein DJ, Ferrett HL, Spottiswoode BS, Renshaw PF, et al. Decreased frontal N-acetylaspartate levels in adolescents concurrently using both methamphetamine and marijuana. Behav Brain Res. 2013;246:154–61.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Kahn RS, Rossum Inge Wintervan, Leucht S, McGuire P, Lewis SW, Leboyer M, et al. Amisulpride and olanzapine followed by open-label treatment with clozapine in first-episode schizophrenia and schizophreniform disorder (OPTiMiSE): a three-phase switching study. Lancet Psychiatry. 2018;5:797–807.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Carbon M, Correll CU. Clinical predictors of therapeutic response to antipsychotics in schizophrenia. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2014;16:505–24.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Robinson DG, Woerner MG, Alvir J, Ma J, Geisler S, Koreen A, et al. Predictors of treatment response from a first episode of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. Am J Psychiatry. 1999;156:544–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Conus P, Seidman LJ, Fournier M, Xin L, Cleusix M, Baumann PS, et al. N- acetylcysteine in a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial: toward biomarker-guided treatment in early psychosis. Schizophr Bull. 2018;44:317–27.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Zheng W, Zhang Q-E, Cai D-B, Yang X-H, Qiu Y, Ungvari GS, et al. N-acetylcysteine for major mental disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2018;137:391–400.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Breier A, Leffick E, Hummer TA, Vohs JL, Yang Z, Mehdiyoun NF, et al. Effects of 12-month double-blind N-acetyl cysteine on symptoms, cognition and brain morphology in early phase schizophrenia-spectrum disorders. Schizophr Res. 2018;199:395–492.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Rapado-Castro M, Dod S, Bush AI, Skvarc DR, On ZX, Berk M, Dean OM, et al. Cognitive effects of adjunctive N-acetyl cysteine in psychosis. Psychol Med. 2017;47:866–76.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Bulut M, Savas HA, Altindag A, Virit O, Dalkilic A. Beneficial effects of N-acetylcysteine in treatment resistant schizophrenia. World J Biol Psychiatry. 2009;10:626–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Schwerk A, Alves FDS, Pouwels PJW, van Amelsvoort T. Metabolic alterations associated with schizophrenia: a critical evaluation of proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy studies. J Neurochem. 2014;128:1–87.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank Dr Joe Gati, Mr Trevor Szekeres, Dr Tushar Das, and Dr Ali Khan for their assistance in data acquisition and archiving. We thank Dr William Pavlovsky for consultations on clinical radiological queries. We thank Drs Raj Harricharan, Julie Richard, Priya Subramaniam, and Hooman Ganjavi and all staff members of the PEPP London team for their assistance in patient recruitment and supporting clinical care. We gratefully acknowledge the participants and their family members for their contributions. The MRS pulse sequence package used was developed from a source code provided by Uzay E. Emir, PhD, and Dinesh K. Deelchand, PhD, Center for Magnetic Resonance Research (CMRR), Minneapolis, MN. It is based on original work by Gülin Öz and Ivan Tkáč [Öz G, Tkáč I. Short-echo, single-shot, full-intensity 1H MRS for neurochemical profiling at 4T: validation in the cerebellum and brainstem. Magn Reson Med. 2011;65(4):901–10]. Our special thanks to Uzay E. Emir, PhD, Dinesh K. Deelchand, PhD, Gülin Öz, PhD, Ivan Tkáč, PhD, and Edward Auerbach, PhD, for their help with sequence testing and for valuable technical discussions and to Dennis W. J. Klomp, PhD, and Vincent O. Boer, PhD, for providing the asymmetric excitation pulse used in the 7T version of the sequence. We also acknowledge CFREF BrainsCAN funding that we received providing a reduced hourly rate for the MRI scans.


This study was funded by CIHR Foundation Grant (375104/2017) to LP; Schulich School of Medicine Clinical Investigator Fellowship to KD; AMOSO Opportunities fund to LP; Bucke Family Fund to LP; Grad student salary support of PJ by NSERC Discovery Grant (No. RGPIN-2016-05055) to JT; Canada Graduate Scholarship to KD and support from the Chrysalis Foundation to LP. Data acquisition was supported by the Canada First Excellence Research Fund to BrainSCAN, Western University (Imaging Core).

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lena Palaniyappan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

LP receives book royalties from Oxford University Press and income from the SPMM MRCPsych course. In the last 5 years, his or his spousal pension funds held shares of Shire Inc., and GlaxoSmithKline. LP has received investigator initiated educational grants from Otsuka, Janssen and Sunovion Canada and speaker fee from Otsuka and Janssen Canada, and Canadian Psychiatric Association. LP, MM, and KD received support from Boehringer Ingelheim to attend an investigator meeting in 2017. JT received speaker honoraria from Siemens Healthcare Canada. All other authors report no potential conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dempster, K., Jeon, P., MacKinley, M. et al. Early treatment response in first episode psychosis: a 7-T magnetic resonance spectroscopic study of glutathione and glutamate. Mol Psychiatry 25, 1640–1650 (2020).

Download citation

Further reading


Quick links