Introduction

Serious environmental pollution and accelerated global warming are attributed to the rapid consumption of fossil fuels, the increasing population, and the rapid development of the economy. Thus, the development of innovative and renewable environmental remediation materials is becoming increasingly important1,2,3,4,5,6. Since mechanically exfoliated graphene was discovered, the development of two-dimensional (2D) materials consisting of atomically thin crystal layers bound by van der Waals forces has accelerated owing to the potential applications of these materials in optoelectronics, catalysis, new technologies, and electricity7,8,9. 2D-MoS2 nanosheets are excellent layered materials, having unique layered structures and large surface areas. It is important to investigate methods for improving the chemical properties of MoS2, which may affect its application in electronic devices, catalysis, and molecular sensing10. A popular method for improving the properties of MoS2 is the decoration of MoS2 with noble metal nanoparticles. For instance, a MoS2/noble metal nanoparticle composite can induce local surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) for activating the photoelectrocatalysis of H2 and enhancing the light absorption or emission of MoS2. Moreover, the LSPR can generate surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS), which can be used in biological and chemical sensing applications11,12,13. Among various traditional noble metal materials, Au nanomaterials are the most widely used SERS substrate material14,15,16. However, the high cost and specialized instruments required for Au substrates hinder their practical application. Due to its very high SERS activity, Ag is another widely studied substrate material17. Although the price of Ag is much lower than the price of Au, the main defect of Ag is its poor stability, which easily oxidizes in air. To address these problems, it is essential to exploit synergistic effects by incorporating inexpensive and stable semiconductors.

Thus far, a few MoS2-based heterostructures, such as CdS/MoS2, TiO2/MoS2, and MoO3/MoS2, have exhibited higher photocatalytic efficiencies than pristine MoS218,19,20. Investigations have been continuously conducted on the efficient separation of a nanocomposite (NC) from a treated effluent, along with the subsequent reusability of the NC. Several research groups have begun to focus on magnetically separable photocatalysts for wastewater treatment, demonstrating the value of the special properties of magnetic materials. Among these magnetic materials, Fe2O3 has a narrow bandgap, high chemical resistance, and high resistance to corrosion. Therefore, rationally designed MoS2/Fe2O3 NCs can serve as a reusable SERS substrate for detection and easily reclaimed photocatalyst. The recovery and economical reuse of MoS2/Fe2O3 NCs photocatalysts is easily achieved by adding an external magnetic field.

Bisphenol A (BPA) is believed to be an endocrine disruptor and widely exists in food containers and the environment. Even low levels of BPA entering the body can disrupt the endocrine system by binding to estrogen receptors, which may lead to cardiovascular diseases, immune function deficiencies, impaired reproductive capacity, and other diseases21,22,23. Thus, it is imperative to develop a facile, rapid, and inexpensive method for BPA detection and degradation.

In this study, MoS2/Fe2O3 NCs were prepared via a simple low-temperature hydrothermal method, and the advantages of the two materials were combined. For example, after 50 min of ultraviolet (UV) irradiation, the substrate completely degraded BPA, and upon recovery, demonstrated its detection capability. Compared with MoS2 NFs and Fe2O3 NPs, the rate of degradation of BPA and the SERS activity of MoS2/Fe2O3 NCs were significantly better. This new, easily recoverable SERS sensor with a high sensitivity will facilitate sensing harmful molecules. To the best of our knowledge, no MoS2/Fe2O3 composites that exhibit BPA detection and photocatalysis multifunctionality have been reported thus far. Photocatalytic and SERS mechanisms were also proposed.

Results and discussion

Characterization analysis of MoS2/Fe2O3 NCs

A growth flow diagram of the MoS2/Fe2O3 NCs is shown in Fig. 1. Figure 2a confirms that the MoS2 sample was pure hexagonal 2H-MoS2 (JCPDS card no. 37-1492). The peak with the highest intensity (at 2θ = 14.09°) indicated that MoS2 had excellent lamellar growth in the c-axis direction. In regard to MoS2/Fe2O3, some of the peaks corresponded to 2H-MoS2, while others corresponded to tetragonal γ-Fe2O3 (JCPDS card no. 39-1346) phase, indicating that the native structure of each constituent was well preserved during the reaction. The intensities of the MoS2 peaks for the MoS2/Fe2O3 NCs were lower than those for pure MoS2 because the Fe2O3 NPs attached to the MoS2 nanoflowers (NFs). Raman spectra confirmed the chemical composition of the MoS2/Fe2O3 NCs and MoS2. Two characteristic Raman peaks of MoS2 were observed at 337 and 377 cm−1, corresponding to the A1g and 1E2g vibration modes, respectively; additionally, their peak frequency difference was Δk = 40 cm−1 (Fig. 2b)24,25,26. However, after the incorporation of Fe2O3, the characteristic Raman peaks of MoS2 shifted to 338 and 379 cm−1, and the peak frequency difference was Δk = 41 cm−1. Δk represents the number of MoS2 layers27. As shown in Fig. 2c, the pristine MoS2 samples were flower-like nanospheres with diameters of ~1–2 μm. Wrinkles and scrolling were observed in the transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images (Fig. 2d), indicating the extremely small thickness of the 2D structure. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) (Fig. 2e) revealed the presence of Fe2O3 nanoparticles (well below 20 nm in size according to TEM, Fig. 2f). As shown in Fig. 2g, Fe2O3 nanoparticles were dispersed, and a few Fe2O3 nanoparticle aggregations were present on the MoS2 NF. The high-resolution TEM image in Fig. 2h provided further insight regarding the morphology and microstructure of MoS2/Fe2O3. The d-spacing of the lattice stripes of Fe2O3 was 0.252 nm, which corresponded to the (0 0 1) lattice plane of hexagonal Fe2O328. In regard to the MoS2/Fe2O3 NCs, the lattice spacing was 0.624 nm, corresponding to the hexagonal MoS2 (0 0 2) plane. In addition, the boundary between Fe2O3 and MoS2 was clearly observed, indicating that a heterojunction was formed between these two components. The regions with different colors in Fig. 2j–m correspond to S, Mo, Fe, and O, and the elemental distribution in MoS2/Fe2O3 was uniform.

Fig. 1: Preparation process and application of MoS2/Fe2O3Cs.
figure 1

Schematic showing the preparation process and application of MoS2/Fe2O3 NCs.

Fig. 2: Structural quality and morphology of MoS2/Fe2O3 NCs.
figure 2

a XRD patterns of MoS2 and MoS2/Fe2O3. b Raman spectra of MoS2 and MoS2/Fe2O3. c SEM images of MoS2 NFs. d TEM image of typical MoS2 NFs. e SEM image of Fe2O3 NPs. f TEM image of the Fe2O3 NPs. g SEM image of MoS2/Fe2O3 NCs. h HRTEM image of MoS2/Fe2O3 NCs. im Typical STEM image of MoS2/Fe2O3 and the corresponding elemental mapping images of Mo, S, Fe, and O.

X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was performed to analyze the electronic states and chemical composition of the MoS2/Fe2O3 NCs (Fig. 3). The survey scan spectra of pristine MoS2, Fe2O3, and MoS2/Fe2O3 NCs are presented in Fig. 3a, which confirmed the coexistence of Fe 2p, O 1s, Mo 3p, and S 2p in the hybrid. The Mo 3d spectra exhibited three peaks for pristine MoS2, but after forming the MoS2/Fe2O3 NCs, four peaks appeared in Fig. 3b. The peaks at 235.8, 232.6, 229.4, and 226.5 eV corresponded to Mo6+ 3d3/2, Mo4+ 3d3/2, Mo4+ 3d5/2, and S 2s, respectively. A small portion of Mo4+ was oxidized into Mo6+ during the reaction, confirming that Fe2O3 was successfully recombined with MoS2. In Fig. 3b, the two peaks at 163.3 and 162.2 eV could be assigned to the doublet S 2p1/2 and S 2p3/2 orbitals of divalent sulfide ions (S2), respectively, in agreement with the formation of the MoS2 nanostructure29. The Fe 2p spectrum exhibited two peaks at 710.4 and 723.7 eV (Fig. 3c), corresponding to the Fe 2p3/2 and Fe 2p1/2 components of γ-Fe2O330. XPS peak shifts were also observed in the MoS2/Fe2O3 composites compared with pristine Fe2O3, confirming the successful formation of an electronically coupled interface between MoS2 and Fe2O331,32. The high-resolution O 1s spectrum of the MoS2/Fe2O3 NCs is shown in Fig. 3d. The spectrum could be deconvoluted into two components: the peak at 529.3 eV was related to the binding energy of Fe-O in Fe2O3 caused by lattice O, and the peak at 530.7 eV was related to the O2− ions in the anoxic region33. Specifically, the C 1s spectrum (Fig. 3f) was deconvoluted into four peaks at 283.7, 284.1, 284.9, and 288.3 eV corresponding to the C-C/C = C, C-O, C-S, and O-C = O bonds, respectively34.

Fig. 3: The electronic states and chemical composition of the MoS2/Fe2O3 NCs.
figure 3

a XPS survey spectra for MoS2/Fe2O3 NCs, MoS2, and Fe2O3. XPS spectra of MoS2/Fe2O3 and MoS2: b Mo 3d, c S 2p, d Fe 2p, e O 1s, and f C 1s of the MoS2/Fe2O3 NCs.

SERS enhancement and reusability of MoS2/Fe2O3 NCs for BPA detection

Herein, p-aminobenzene sulfonic acid, NaNO3, and Na2CO3 as Pauly’s reagent were added in the BPA detection test to enhance the adhesion of BPA on the surface of the MoS2/Fe2O3 NCs. As shown in Fig. 4, p-aminobenzene sulfonic acid, NaNO3 and Na2CO3, were all low Raman scattering active molecules; therefore, their addition had almost no effect on BPA detection. To confirm that MoS2/Fe2O3 had excellent SERS properties, SERS spectra of BPA absorbed on MoS2/Fe2O3 at various concentrations ranging from 10−4 to 10−9 M were obtained, as shown in Fig. 5a. These results indicated that as the concentration of BPA decreased, the intensity of the Raman peaks decreased. The characteristic peak of BPA at 1124 cm−1 was observed at concentrations as low as 10−9 M, indicating that the MoS2/Fe2O3 NCs had a high sensitivity. The intensity of the peak at 1124 cm−1 was correlated with the BPA concentration; thus, we used it for further quantitative analysis. Figure 5b shows the direct proportionality between the BPA concentration, in the range of 10−4–10−9 M, and the normalized Raman signal intensity. The linear equation is as follows:

$${\mathrm{log}}(I_{1124}) = (1624 \pm 106){\mathrm{log}}\,C_{\mathrm{BPA}} + (17,076 \pm 746)$$
(1)

with a squared correlation coefficient of R2 = 0.97. The stability of the substrate is an important factor that must be considered. As shown in Fig. 5c, the SERS spectrum of the MoS2/Fe2O3 NCs substrate hardly changed over time; thus, the MoS2/Fe2O3 NCs could be stored for at least 3 months under ambient conditions.

Fig. 4: Detection of Pauly’s reagent.
figure 4

a SERS spectra of BPA, p-aminobenzene sulfonic acid, NaNO3, and Na2CO3 adsorbed on the MoS2/Fe2O3 NCs. b SERS spectrum of p-aminobenzene sulfonic acid adsorbed on the MoS2/Fe2O3 NCs. c SERS spectra of NaNO3 adsorbed on the MoS2/Fe2O3 NCs. d SERS spectrum of Na2CO3 adsorbed on the MoS2/Fe2O3 NCs.

Fig. 5: Sensitivity, stability, and reproducibility of MoS2/Fe2O3 NCs.
figure 5

a SERS spectra of MoS2/Fe2O3 NCs incubated with a BPA aqueous solution at various concentrations. b Calibration curve for BPA at 1124 cm−1. c SERS spectra of the 10−4 M BPA aqueous solution based on the MoS2/Fe2O3 substrate collected at different shelf times. d Room temperature magnetic hysteresis curves of the MoS2/Fe2O3 NCs and MoS2 NFs. The inset shows the water dispersibility and magnetic separability of the MoS2/Fe2O3 NCs. e SERS spectra of BPA after the self-cleaning test. f Corresponding normalized Raman intensities of 1385 cm−1 when the SERS substrate was recycled five times for the detection of 10−4 M BPA.

As shown in Fig. 5d, the hysteresis loop of the MoS2/Fe2O3 NCs indicated excellent superparamagnetic behavior. The saturation magnetization (Ms) value of the MoS2/Fe2O3 NCs (0.46 emu/g) was higher than that of Fe2O3 alone. This good magnetic property completely satisfied the requirements for magnetic separation. The uniformly dispersed MoS2/Fe2O3 NCs quickly separated from the solution and formed aggregates within 22 s when external magnets were used. Conversely, when the magnets were removed, the agglomerated MoS2/Fe2O3 quickly redistributed into the solution via slight shaking, as shown in the inset of Fig. 5d. In addition, we measured the magnetization of the MoS2/Fe2O3 NCs after 3 months and found that the Ms value hardly changed (from 0.46 to 0.52 emu/g). Hence, we concluded that MoS2/Fe2O3 NCs were highly stable at room temperature and atmospheric pressure. To test the reusability of the MoS2/Fe2O3 NCs, we repeated the SERS experiment five times with the same sample. After each experiment, the MoS2/Fe2O3 NCs were separated from the solution using a magnet. Figure 5e shows the SERS spectrum of a MoS2/Fe2O3 substrate that was reused after absorbing the same concentration of BPA; the results indicated that the substrate had good reproducibility. As shown in Fig. 5f, the MoS2/Fe2O3 NC substrate had excellent SERS activity even after five recycling runs. Although the average Raman intensity decreased slightly, it satisfied the qualitative testing requirements for BPA. These results indicate that the MoS2/Fe2O3 NCs were reproducible and show promise as reusable substrate materials.

Detection in “real-world” samples

To evaluate the application of the MoS2/Fe2O3 NCs, “real-world” samples (lake water and milk) were chosen for detection. As shown in Fig. 6, the characteristic CH wagging peak of BPA at 1124 cm−1 was observed at concentrations as low as 10−7 M for these samples, indicating that the MoS2/Fe2O3 NCs could be used for the practical and rapid detection of BPA.

Fig. 6: Detection of “real-world” samples.
figure 6

Detection of BPA using the MoS2/Fe2O3 NCs substrates in “real-world” samples.

Photocatalytic activity of MoS2/Fe2O3 NCs

The catalytic properties of the pristine MoS2 NFs, Fe2O3 NPs, and MoS2/Fe2O3 NCs were evaluated by performing BPA degradation experiments under UV irradiation. The BPA degradation results for the MoS2 NFs, Fe2O3 NPs, and MoS2/Fe2O3 NCs samples under UV light are presented in Fig. 7a–c, respectively. For all catalysts, the intensity of the main absorption peak decreased with increasing irradiation time. After 50 min of UV irradiation, the degradation rates of the two pristine photocatalysts (MoS2 NFs and Fe2O3 NPs) were only ~40% and 48%, respectively. Surprisingly, the photocatalytic activity was significantly increased in the presence of the MoS2/Fe2O3 NCs catalyst; in this case, >92% of the present BPA was decomposed after 50 min of irradiation, as shown in Fig. 7c. This degradation rate is significantly higher than those observed with the MoS2 NFs and Fe2O3 NPs.

Fig. 7: Photocatalytic activity of MoS2/Fe2O3 NCs.
figure 7

UV–vis absorption spectra of a BPA solution in the presence of a MoS2 NFs, b Fe2O3 NPs, and c MoS2/Fe2O3 NCs.

A related graph showing the dependence of the BPA degradation efficiencies of the MoS2/Fe2O3 NCs and other catalysts on the UV irradiation time is presented in Fig. 8a. We define the degradation efficiency as C/C0, where C0 represents the initial BPA concentration (mg/L) and C represents the BPA concentration after the reaction (mg/L). As shown in Fig. 8a, the MoS2/Fe2O3 NCs had better photocatalytic activity than the other catalysts. The photocatalytic efficiency of MoS2/Fe2O3 NCs was as high as 0.02, which was higher than that of pure MoS2 (0.01) and Fe2O3 (0.008). Thus, the MoS2/Fe2O3 NCs has great potential for use in wastewater treatments. Before light irradiation, the photocatalyst and BPA solution were stirred under dark conditions for 10 min to attain an adsorption equilibrium. During this period, the concentration of BPA decreased because of the adsorption of BPA molecules on the photocatalysts. We used the pseudo-first-order mode to investigate the reaction kinetics of BPA degradation. The simplified equation is:

$$- {\mathrm{ln}}(C/C_0) + kt$$
(2)

where k represents the apparent first-order reaction rate constant35. Figure 8b shows the relationship between −ln(C/C0) and the irradiation time for different photocatalysts. The curves could be fitted with a linear relationship, indicating that the degradation kinetics followed a typical first-order reaction. Using Eq. (1), we determined the apparent pseudo-first-order rate constants for the different photocatalysts. The k values of the pristine Fe2O3 NPs, MoS2 NFs, and MoS2/Fe2O3 NCs were calculated to be 0.69, 0.53, and 2.41, respectively. Stable photoactivity under UV light is critical for practical water treatment applications, particularly for composite materials that may lose their coating. We examined the loss of the BPA degradation activity of the MoS2/Fe2O3 NCs by utilizing it for five consecutive cycles under UV light irradiation. No loss of activity was observed (Fig. 8c). As shown in Fig. 8d, the structure of the catalyst was not significantly changed after five consecutive photocatalytic degradation cycles, also suggesting that the Fe2O3 nanoparticles could slow down the photocorrosion of MoS2, thereby efficiently protecting MoS2. Generally, MoS2 is prone to photocorrosion due to oxidation of surface sulfions to sulfurs by photoexcited holes. Therefore, the MoS2/Fe2O3 NCs exhibited high stability and excellent anti-photocorrosion properties, showing that this material has promise for use in environmental restoration applications.

Fig. 8: Photocatalytic activity and stable photoactivity of MoS2/Fe2O3 NCs.
figure 8

a Evolution of the relative concentrations (C/C0) of BPA with several photocatalysts as a function of irradiation time. b Corresponding kinetic plots of the photocatalytic degradation of BPA with the selected photocatalysts. c Reusability and stable activity of the MoS2/Fe2O3 NCs after being used for five cycles of the photocatalytic degradation of BPA. d XRD pattern of the MoS2/Fe2O3 NCs before and after the fifth cycle.

Mechanisms of SERS detection and photocatalysis

When the MoS2/Fe2O3 heterojunction system was irradiated with UV light, MoS2 was excited, generating electron–hole pairs because of its narrow bandgap. The photoinduced electrons moved rapidly from the conduction band (CB) of MoS2 to that of Fe2O3, as shown in Fig. 9. In the MoS2/Fe2O3 NCs, the spatial separation of photoexcited holes and electrons extended the charge-carrier lifetime and hindered the recombination of electron–hole pairs, thereby enhancing the photocatalytic activity. Moreover, the selected transfer of holes from the valence band (VB) of MoS2 to Fe2O3 remarkably weakened the photocorrosion activity. After the carriers of MoS2 and Fe2O3 were generated, the free electrons accumulated in the CB of Fe2O3, while photoinduced holes were present in the VB of MoS2; thus, a high photocatalytic activity was obtained. Effective Z-type electron–hole pair separation and an effective transfer path were achieved, and a strong redox capacity of the photoexcited electron and holes was obtained in the CB and VB, respectively, significantly improving the photocatalytic and SERS activity of the MoS2/Fe2O3 NC heterojunction. Therefore, Fe2O3 not only acted as a protective shell for the MoS2 core by preventing the loss of sulfur but also constructed Z-type junctions that prolonged the lives of photogenerated electrons and holes, which would significantly enhance the photocatalytic activity and stability. Another reason for the SERS enhancement was the semiconducting nature of MoS2. Because its surface had S atoms and polar covalent bonds (Mo-S) perpendicular to the surface, this dipole–dipole coupling significantly increased the intensity of the Raman peaks36. In addition, because of the large surface-to-volume ratio, there was an abundance of active adsorption sites for gas molecules. The reactions involved in the photocatalytic process are summarized as follows:

$${\mathrm{Mo}}/{\mathrm{Fe}}_2{\mathrm{O}}_3 + h\nu \to {\mathrm{MoS}}_{\mathrm{2}}\left( {h^ + } \right) + {\mathrm{Fe}}_2{\mathrm{O}}_3\left( {{\mathrm{e}}^ - } \right)$$
(3)
$${\mathrm{O}}_{\mathrm{2}} + {\mathrm{e}}^ - \to {\dot{\mathrm O}}_2^ -$$
(4)
$${\dot{\mathrm O}}_2^ - + {\dot{\mathrm O}}_2^ - + 2{\mathrm{H}}^ + \to {\mathrm{H}}_2{\mathrm{O}}_2 + {\mathrm{O}}_2$$
(5)
$${\mathrm{H}}_{\mathrm{2}}{\mathrm{O}}_{\mathrm{2}} + {\mathrm{e}}^ - + h\nu \to {\dot{\mathrm{O}}{\mathrm {H}}} + {\mathrm{OH}}^ -$$
(6)
$${\mathrm{BPA}} + {\dot{\mathrm O}{\mathrm{H}}} \to {\mathrm{CO}}_2 + {\mathrm{H}}_2{\mathrm{O}} + {\mathrm{degraded}}\,{\mathrm{BPA}}$$
(7)
Fig. 9: SERS and photocatalytic mechanisms of MoS2/Fe2O3NCs.
figure 9

Schematic illustration showing the proposed SERS and photocatalytic mechanisms of MoS2/Fe2O3 NCs.

Conclusion

In summary, a multifunctional material was fabricated by simply depositing Fe2O3 NPs onto MoS2 NFs, which significantly improved its photocatalytic properties and ability to be used as a SERS substrate. In addition, the MoS2/Fe2O3 NCs were successfully recycled. This study is the first to report MoS2/Fe2O3 NCs used as SERS substrates for BPA detection. The MoS2/Fe2O3 NCs had a detection limit of 1 × 10−9 M, along with exhibiting excellent stability. The prepared MoS2/Fe2O3 NCs had higher photocatalytic activity than the MoS2 NFs and Fe2O3 NPs alone. The enhanced photocatalytic activity and SERS activity were attributed to the efficient separation and transfer of electron–hole pairs by the Z-scheme heterojunction system. Therefore, as efficient multifunctional catalysts, MoS2/Fe2O3 NCs are expected to not only replace metal catalysts for removing organic matter from water and the environment but also pave the way for SERS applications, thereby introducing new methods for chemical and medical detection and for environmental monitoring.

Materials and methods

MoS2 NF preparation

First, 0.5 g H4MoNa2O6 and 0.7 g CH4N2S were mixed and stirred in 70 mL of ultrapure water. Then, 0.5 g C6H8O7·H2O was added until complete dissolution was achieved. The sample was transferred into an 80 mL Teflon-lined hydrothermal autoclave reactor and then placed in a drying box at 240 °C for 24 h. Next, the reaction products were centrifuged with alcohol and ultrapure water and dried at 70 °C.

MoS2/Fe2O3 NC preparation

First, 0.2 g of MoS2 powder, 0.5 g of H18FeN3O18, and 0.7 g of H2NCONH2 were mixed in 70 mL of ultrapure water. Then, 0.02 g of C18H29NaO3S were well dispersed in the liquid mixture, stirred in a 60 °C water bath for 35 min, transferred to an 80 mL reactor, and finally placed in a drying box at 90 °C for 12 h. The MoS2/Fe2O3 NCs were washed with absolute ethanol and water to remove possible residuals. The solid powder solid was placed in a drying box and kept dry at 80 °C.

Characterizations

XPS (ESCALAB250X, Thermo Scientific) and X-ray diffraction (XRD, D/Max 3C, Rigaku) were used to study the structural quality. TEM (JEM-2100HR, JEOL) and SEM (JSM-7800F, JEOL) were used to characterize the morphology of the samples. UV–visible absorption spectroscopy (UV-3600, Shimadzu Corporation) and a vibrating sample magnetometer (7407, Lake Shore) were used to characterize the optical and magnetic properties of the samples. Raman spectra were obtained with an Ar+-ion laser (inVia Raman, Renishaw).

SERS experiments of BPA

We used the coupling reaction of BPA with Pauly’s reagents (p-aminobenzene sulfonic acid, HCl, NaNO3, and Na2CO3) to enhance the adhesion of BPA onto the surface of the SERS substrate materials. Please refer to our previous report for the detailed process37.

SERS experiments of BPA in milk and lake water

Real milk contains fat, protein, vitamins, and other organic ingredients that can interfere with the detection of BPA. Therefore, it is necessary to pretreat the milk sample with BPA. The process is as follows. First, methanol (7 mL) and water (3 mL) were mixed and added to the milk sample (containing 10−7 M BPA, 4 mL), and then the mixture was sonicated and centrifuged at 10,000 r.p.m. for 3 min. The upper supernatant was extracted and then dried. This extract was collected in another centrifuge tube and mixed with methanol and water, with the above sonication and centrifugation process being repeated. Finally, the extract was filtered by membrane filters (0.45 and 0.22 µm) for the SERS test. The procedures for the detection and data analysis were the same as those for detecting BPA in water.

We collected lake water from a local source (South Lake in Changchun City). Lake water samples with BPA added were filtered by membrane filters (0.45 and 0.22 µm) before the detection test to avoid interference from other impurities. The test process was consistent with that described above.

Photodegradation experiments

In the degradation process, circulating water was used to ensure that all the tests were performed at room temperature. The photodegradation of BPA under UV light was performed to assess the activity of photocatalysts. One hundred milliliters of an aqueous solution was prepared with 0.001 g of BPA and 0.05 g of Fe2O3/MoS2, MoS2, or Fe2O3 NCs. The test solution was stirred magnetically in a 100-mL beaker. The sample was kept in a dark room for 10 min for the adsorption of BPA molecules on the photocatalysts before being subjected to UV irradiation. During the experiment, the samples were taken at specified times. After each sampling, the catalyst was separated via centrifugation for testing.