Abstract
Existing single-cell adhesion kinetics methods are performed under conditions highly unlike the physiological cell adhesion conditions. Now, researchers have developed a new optical technique for high-precision measurement of cell lateral adhesion kinetics in complex clinical samples.
Cell adhesion is highly involved in many biological processes, such as cell communication1, tissue development2,3, virus invasion4,5, and cancer metastasis6,7. A variety of single-cell adhesion methods have been developed based on atomic force microscopy (AFM)8,9,10, optical tweezers11,12,13, magnetic tweezers14,15,16, acoustic tweezers17,18,19, micro-needle manipulation20, and biomembrane force probes21. These methods all depend on repeatedly rupturing the adhesive contact in the normal direction of the cell interface so as to measure the normal tensile force22,23; however, different methods can still yield measurement results that differ by several orders of magnitude. These discrepancies stem from dynamic changes in sample interactions and a lack of consideration for lateral adhesion kinetics24.
Preliminary studies have shown that in vivo cell adhesion under physiological flow is more complex, and that lateral adhesion kinetics play a significant role in the dynamic modulation to withstand changing flow25,26,27,28. Currently, there exist microfluidic techniques for analyzing the lateral force along the tangential direction29,30,31; however, these methods face limitations in terms of time required for measurement, cell interaction distance, and measurement resolution. High-precision and high-speed in situ measurement of lateral adhesion kinetics remains an open challenge.
In this issue of eLight, Yuebing Zheng’s research team at the University of Texas at Austin in USA presents a new optical technique, termed the single-cell rotational adhesion frequency assay (scRAFA). This method integrates optical trapping, rotation, imaging, and spectroscopy on a single platform. ScRAFA exploits a microfluidic platform integrated with versatile optothermal manipulation and optical imaging capabilities to stably trap and rotate any specific single cell, continuously monitor the complete cell adhesion process from initiation of bonding with the substrate to formation of permanent attachment (response time <0.1 s), and precisely control the interaction distance between substrate ligands and cell receptors (resolution ±0.1 nm), which control cannot be achieved in a conventional flow chamber assay32. More specifically, a focused 785 nm laser beam was first applied to trap the cell with optical force, then the temperature gradient field produced by a focused 532 nm laser beam was used to rotate the cell. Subsequently, Zheng’s team retrieved the time-dependent light intensity signals from collected images to quantify the cell’s adhesion behaviors. By testing the lateral cellular interactions caused by flow-induced shear stress, they were able to successfully measure the adhesion strength of yeast cells in human urine and obtain more accurate dissociation constants, which is ~10 times more accurate than previous measurements.
Different from many of the existing adhesion measurement methods, the proposed light-driven scRAFA can reveal the shear-force-dependent adhesion behaviors of individual cells while in physiological fluids with various surface conditions. With its superior performance and general applicability, scRAFA will be a valuable tool in a wide range of fields, from cell biology to immunotherapy, biomedicine, and engineering.
References
Takeichi, M. The cadherins: cell-cell adhesion molecules controlling animal morphogenesis. Development 102, 639–655 (1988).
Vestweber, D. How leukocytes cross the vascular endothelium. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 15, 692–704 (2015).
Gumbiner, B. M. Cell adhesion: the molecular basis of tissue architecture and morphogenesis. Cell 84, 345–357 (1996).
Iwasaki, A. & Pillai, P. S. Innate immunity to influenza virus infection. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 14, 315–328 (2014).
Garrett, T. R., Bhakoo, M. & Zhang, Z. B. Bacterial adhesion and biofilms on surfaces. Prog. Nat. Sci. 18, 1049–1056 (2008).
Khalili, A. A. & Ahmad, M. R. A review of cell adhesion studies for biomedical and biological applications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 16, 18149–18184 (2015).
Wai Wong, C., Dye, D. E. & Coombe, D. R. The role of immunoglobulin superfamily cell adhesion molecules in cancer metastasis. Int. J. Cell Biol. 2012, 340296 (2012).
Hinterdorfer, P. & Dufrêne, Y. F. Detection and localization of single molecular recognition events using atomic force microscopy. Nat. Methods 3, 347–355 (2006).
Zlatanova, J., Lindsay, S. M. & Leuba, S. H. Single molecule force spectroscopy in biology using the atomic force microscope. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 74, 37–61 (2000).
Lee, C. K. et al. Atomic force microscopy: determination of unbinding force, off rate and energy barrier for protein-ligand interaction. Micron 38, 446–461 (2007).
Lang, M. J. et al. An automated two-dimensional optical force clamp for single molecule studies. Biophysical J. 83, 491–501 (2002).
Neuman, K. C. & Block, S. M. Optical trapping. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 75, 2787–2809 (2004).
Neuman, K. C. & Nagy, A. Single-molecule force spectroscopy: optical tweezers, magnetic tweezers and atomic force microscopy. Nat. Methods 5, 491–505 (2008).
Tanase, M., Biais, N. & Sheetz, M. Magnetic tweezers in cell biology. Methods Cell Biol. 83, 473–493 (2007).
Strick, T. et al. Twisting and stretching single DNA molecules. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 74, 115–140 (2000).
Gore, J. et al. Mechanochemical analysis of DNA gyrase using rotor bead tracking. Nature 439, 100–104 (2006).
Sorkin, R. et al. Probing cellular mechanics with acoustic force spectroscopy. Mol. Biol. Cell 29, 2005–2011 (2018).
Guo, X. Y. et al. Controllable cell deformation using acoustic streaming for membrane permeability modulation. Adv. Sci. 8, 2002489 (2021).
Hwang, J. Y. et al. Cell deformation by single-beam acoustic trapping: a promising tool for measurements of cell mechanics. Sci. Rep. 6, 27238 (2016).
Chesla, S. E., Selvaraj, P. & Zhu, C. Measuring two-dimensional receptor-ligand binding kinetics by micropipette. Biophys. J. 75, 1553–1572 (1998).
Evans, E., Ritchie, K. & Merkel, R. Sensitive force technique to probe molecular adhesion and structural linkages at biological interfaces. Biophys. J. 68, 2580–2587 (1995).
Zhang, Y. et al. Low spring constant regulates P-selectin-PSGL-1 bond rupture. Biophys. J. 95, 5439–5448 (2008).
Yang, J. S. et al. Molecular interaction and inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 binding to the ACE2 receptor. Nat. Commun. 11, 4541 (2020).
Wrapp, D. et al. Cryo-EM structure of the 2019-nCoV spike in the prefusion conformation. Science 367, 1260–1263 (2020).
Daniels, B. R., Masi, B. C. & Wirtz, D. Probing single-cell micromechanics in vivo: the microrheology of C. elegans developing embryos. Biophys. J. 90, 4712–4719 (2006).
McEver, R. P. & Zhu, C. Rolling cell adhesion. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 26, 363–396 (2010).
Zhu, C. et al. Mechanosensing through immunoreceptors. Nat. Immunol. 20, 1269–1278 (2019).
Katsumi, A. et al. Integrins in mechanotransduction. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 12001–12004 (2004).
Zhu, C. et al. Mechanisms for flow-enhanced cell adhesion. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 36, 604–621 (2008).
Chang, K. C., Tees, D. F. J. & Hammer, D. A. The state diagram for cell adhesion under flow: leukocyte rolling and firm adhesion. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 11262–11267 (2000).
Alon, R., Hammer, D. A. & Springer, T. A. Lifetime of the P-selectin-carbohydrate bond and its response to tensile force in hydrodynamic flow. Nature 377, 86 (1995).
Liu, Y. et al. Light-driven single-cell rotational adhesion frequency assay. eLight 2, 13 (2022).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, Z., Ahmed, D. Light-driven high-precision cell adhesion kinetics. Light Sci Appl 11, 266 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41377-022-00963-w
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41377-022-00963-w
This article is cited by
-
Acoustic tweezers for high-throughput single-cell analysis
Nature Protocols (2023)
